The Prisoner’s Wife in a Jailed Republic

Chronicle of a woman’s life after her husband was arrested by Delhi Police.

New Delhi: The morning is a bit rushed: waking up three children, making them sit for online classes, especially the seven-year-old, designating a spot for each of them and making sure that they don’t start playing video games, doze off to sleep or get into a brawl with each other during the classes. It can be a bit much when you have been parenting solo for the last 17 months.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

§

It’s her 14th year of being married. When the marriage proposal came in 2007, both she and him wanted to meet at least once privately, something still a rarity in most traditional arranged marriage situations.

They were to meet at a newly opened Pizza Hut outlet in Connaught Place in central Delhi. She was 20, a first-year undergraduate student of Delhi University. Him, 25 and a postgraduate from Symbiosis Institute, Pune.

She took the metro, and he drove. “Unlike other men I had seen, he was neither reckless nor stuck up.  Sensible and mature, but also had a sense of humour,” she says.

“He collected chillies from both our pizzas and made me eat them. Imagine!” she recounts.

He even made her foot the bill for the meeting. She grew up with men around her paying for things. This was entirely unexpected from a man who you are supposed to marry. “But I liked it. I felt equal, in control,” she says.

They got married in a few months. It was a conventional life, but a happy one.

The next few years were spent taking care of her three children, the youngest came much later because they both wanted a daughter desperately.

He initially worked with his father in his furniture business. “But he was not very inspired in his work,” she says. He later started a travel company that organised pilgrimages.

But he always had interests beyond his work.

If the drains would get clogged, if the sewer line would overflow, he would start running from pillar to post to get them cleaned, sorted, she says.

“I used to get hassled. We live on the third floor. It is not even affecting us. Why do you need to do this?”

He got involved in the anti-corruption protests of the India Against Corruption movement in 2011-2012.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

When Aam Aadmi Party was formed in 2012, he genuinely believed in the possibilities of this new party.

“Every election, busy netajis would come and tell us to vote for elephant, kite, spoon, and what not. But they had no time to get the drain cleaned,” she recalls.

Fed up with unemployment, failing infrastructure and useless election campaigns, he worked for the party for a few years.

They had a deal at home. He wouldn’t be asked what he does the entire week. He came late at night, sometimes at 1 am-2 am. They didn’t even have a meal together on days at a stretch. But one day in the week was sacrosanct. The children still call it #FridayMasti and their social media is full of their time together – mall, waterpark, public park or just a drive.

§

On June 22, 2017, a 15-year-old boy, Junaid Khan was on his way back home to Faridabad in a Mathura-bound train. Eid was just days away. He had bought new clothes, shoes, etc. He was stabbed to death by a group of men after an argument over seats turned ugly. The men allegedly mocked the boys, tugged at their beards and accused them of being beef eaters. They threw him out of the train at Asaoti station in Faridabad where he bled to death.

By now India had already witnessed two bloody years of hate crimes and lynchings targeted at the Muslim minorities in the garb of cow protection. Fundamentalists had been emboldened by state support and enjoyed complete impunity.

Also read: Junaid’s Lynching and the Making of a ‘New India’ Beyond Recognition

But Junaid’s lynching brought everyone’s nightmare alive – you may be killed just because you being from a particular community offends fundamentalists.

Five days later, on June 28, 2017, a protest called ‘Not in My name’ was organised all over the country to condemn targeted killings in the name of safeguarding the majority community’s interests.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

He was disturbed too and went to Jantar Mantar, the ‘Not in my Name’ protest site in Delhi.

That is the first time he was detained by the police. “I panicked at the thought of him being arrested.”

That’s when she learnt the difference between detention and arrest.

A couple of people were detained along with him that day. A few days later, they formed an advocacy group called United Against Hate (UAH).

UAH would hold frequent protests for Muslims, tribal Christians, even for Sri Lankan Christians. They organised solidarity events for the Kerala floods and for people in Palestine. They condemned the attack on Nankana saheb and also held public tribunals for fake encounter cases.

They collaborated with journalists, researchers, activists to send out fact-finding missions across India – on the National Register of Citizens in Assam; to Kasganj, Bahraich and Bulandshahar in Uttar Pradesh for the spate of violence. They would even protest for press freedom and even stepped in when journalists like Prashant Kanojia were jailed. A new world had opened up that was beyond the clogged drains and potholes on the road. “It seemed like he had found his calling, finally,” she says.

Within a year and a half, on July 15, 2019, UAH launched a helpline against hate crimes. The helpline was supposed to provide rapid response, legal help and advocacy to people facing hate crimes.

The UAH team was small and they had started taking more work than ever. He would sometimes leave the phone with the helpline number at home and ask her to attend to each and every call.

He did give her the contact numbers of local people in various areas to activate emergency help. But what happened to logic and humanity, she thought.

One day a caller from a remote part of Jharkhand said that a man had been tied to a tree and they were suspecting a lynching.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

She chided the callers. “Great that you are calling but can you actually see someone being lynched in front of your eyes and do nothing but make a phone call? Collect some people and make them stop. We will send some local help immediately but till then go and save them.”

And that day, that person was saved indeed.

People also called up to ask, “Do you only save Muslims?”

I asked one of them, “Do you remember who was killed in Bulandshahr in December 2018?”

In December 2018, two persons – inspector Subodh Kumar Singh and a protester Sumit – were shot dead in the incident, which involved the use of firearms, heavy stone-pelting, brick-batting and arson at a police post in Bulandshahr district of Uttar Pradesh. Members of the Hindu right-wing alleged that cows were being slaughtered in one part of the city and derided police officers as anti-Hindu.

One of the police officers, Subodh Kumar Singh, was also investigating a Dadri lynching case where Akhlaq a 50-something man was lynched in September 2015, on the suspicion of consuming beef. Subodh’s family alleged that he was killed because of that link.

UAH had taken a delegation to Bulandshahr to express solidarity with the family of the deceased.

“But I also told them that it is indeed true that the minorities and the Dalits are more vulnerable to hate crimes in present India. There should not be any false equivalence.”

All this while, her social life was limited to the kitchen, making chai, snacks for a large number of guests he had started receiving. “I didn’t know most people and did not even bother to know,” she says.

Women speaking to strangers on the phone has been long been demonised in India. But it is the anonymity that helped her build confidence to argue, advise, help, listen and navigate territories that she thought were not hers – the public, the social and the political.

§

By now, he had stopped spending time at home. He would go for long hours, not even stay at home on a Sunday. She was being taken for granted, ‘like it always happens,’ she adds.

After women get married, they can hardly maintain old friendships, they move places, get out of touch with their friends. “He is the only friend I have since I got married. We can chat for hours. I had started to miss that.”

When the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was passed on December 12, 2019, he was upset. He became a regular at protest sites, facing the police barricades and pushbacks along with fellow protestors.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

“Honestly, I accompanied him to protests all of next week to be able to spend more time with him. Oblivious that it was prep for what is to follow,” she says.

The Citizenship Amendment Act specifically excluded Muslims from taking refuge in India. The National Register of Citizens (NRC) that was supposed to follow was meant to filter out people who could not present written, documented proof that their ancestors lived in India.

“I told him, you were born in Delhi. I was born in Delhi. Even our kids were born in Delhi. Why are you getting into all this?” she recounts.

He explained to her the ramifications of CAA and NRC for the marginalised, for the poor. He cited the UAH Assam fact-finding report that revealed how several hundred thousand people were declared ‘illegal citizens’ and sent to detention centres.

Also read: We Are Seeing, for the First Time, a Sustained Countrywide Movement Led by Women

Then on December 19, 2019, for the first time, she was detained by the police from a protest site. That day, she received several calls from her extended family members reprimanding her for being an irresponsible mother.

“I told them that I am protesting for my children’s rights too,” she says. “And for the rights of homeless people, my domestic worker and anyone who has no documents because they are too caught up in their struggles to stay alive every day.”

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

She had transitioned from speaking her mind on the phone to strangers to speaking her mind to family – a difficult task in the world she inhabits.

He became one of the co-organisers of an anti-CAA protest site in Khureji in East Delhi, launched in January 2020, a month after the CAA was passed.

It was inspired by a similar demonstration at Shaheen Bagh in South Delhi which had gained national attention. The Khureji protesters sat opposite a pump on Patparganj road, sheltered by canopies and tents. The women would come in the evening after finishing housework. It soon became a popular protest site visited by people from far and wide to show solidarity. She was also a regular participant, often leading marches from the main road to the protest site.

A month later, on February 23, 2020, riots broke out in northeast Delhi near another anti-CAA protest site in Jaffrabad.

That day, he came and he slept off after praying. He looked visibly upset.

“In our world, men are not trained to share their challenges, struggles, problems, emotions with their families. There is role-playing all the time,” she says.

She was not aware that he was not just upset because so many lives were lost in the riots, so close to home. He was also worried because of the police pressure to empty the protest site.

Three days later, on February 26, 2020, the police came and started breaking the protest site and scattered away protesters. They put barricades to stop the protesters from coming back.

She heard that he was picked up from the site. Someone sent her a video that showed him walking peacefully towards the police.

“Must have been detained. He will be back by evening,” she dismissed.

He did not. That day, seven more people were sent into judicial custody including a former municipal councillor from Congress, Ishrat Jahan.

They were charged under various sections of the Arms Act and the Indian Penal Code dealing with rioting armed with a deadly weapon; unlawful assembly; obstruction of a public servant in the discharge of their duty; use of assault or criminal force to deter public servant; attempt to murder. He was also charged with the draconian UAPA, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

Fourteen days later, on March 11, when she saw him next, he was in a wheelchair, with bandages on his legs and fingers of his right hand. He had been beaten in custody.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

He has been in jail for 17 months.

§

Thirteen days after she saw him with broken legs, on March 24, 2020, a nationwide lockdown was imposed following the outbreak of COVID-19. Several international bodies including the UN appealed to various states to release political prisoners.

Also read: India: The New ‘Republic of Fear’

As he is diabetic and prisons are crowded, they were worried for him. He was still not released.

That’s when online classes for children started.

“My English is weak and so he had to step in to help the children with their homework. And here I was navigating online classes simultaneously for three school-going children,” she says.

They didn’t even have a device each for the longest time. It took some time to arrange that slowly and find a rhythm, she says.

She is now a self-taught social media manager for his release campaign. She used the lockdown to train herself. “I didn’t even have a social media account before his arrest,” she recalls.

In the present day, some part of her day is devoted to making posters, videos using graphics and music as part of her advocacy work for his release.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty.

Children do understand why their father is not around, but there is only as much they will. She says she is glad that they are not physically attending school.

Children don’t understand complexities so well. “They would have been bullied for not being able to explain to their schoolmates why their father is in prison,” she says.

During the pandemic, the children, confined at home, would ask for their father. “You can’t have an atmosphere of mourning all the time with such young children at home.”

His memories pepper the day. Throwback vacation videos and pictures, the last one from Goa in 2019 are revisited often. Insta reels – because their favorite Tik Tok was banned – imitating dialogues, dances are frequent too. Computer games – where she learnt that grinding means ‘level up’– are allowed once in a while. That day, the children were eating dal-gosht, his favourite. The youngest stopped eating. She asked, “Why does father get only parwal – pointed gourd – to eat inside the jail?”

He has mohabbat with this country and its people, she says. “Deep love.”

She says that he has never been partisan. If he arrnaged an Eid party, he did Diwali party too. “Since his arrest, so many women came to collect fees for their children. He used to fund them, regardless of which religion they were from. I didn’t even know he was doing this,” she adds.

In the last year and a half, she has become a regular at protests. Whether it is in Hathras’s rape case where a 19-year-old Dalit woman was raped by upper caste men or the ongoing farmers’ protest.

“I have learnt that all those who want a better country need to stick around,” she says.

In the last year and a half, she has had to learn a lot of legal terminologies and to know what to say when in public. She can express solidarity and also deal with the hurt when neighbours or extended families question her demeanour.

She didn’t ask for help, didn’t play the victim, something not appreciated in a woman. And so her stepping out of the house – to pay electricity bill, fill gas cylinder, taking her child to a dentist or taking herself to a physiotherapist to treat her leg – something that she did not do on her own before – invite derision, segregation.

When she takes the children to the market, they ask, “Mummy, it’s not expensive no?” before wanting to buy anything. Something they never thought about when their father was around.

Like all travel businesses, his company has been shut for over a year due to the pandemic. The savings are depleting. “I have learnt a bit since he has been away.  Slowly, I will try to learn to put his company back on track too,” she says.

What she is still learning is to be more creative with the excuses that she gives her children.

They endlessly ask, “Mummy, when will father come home?”

She cites the date of one of their birthdays. It comes and goes, but he doesn’t come. She cites the date of the next upcoming birthday in the family. Six such birthdays have passed.

Children should not lose hope. And so everyday plans are made on how they will welcome Khalid Saifi, their father, home.

“I will stand with chicken tikka in one hand, Chinese food in the other in front of him, when he is released,” says Yessa, the oldest.

“Crackers, lots of them, rockets and sparklers,” says Taha, the middle one.

“Flowers in every corner of the house and loud music,” says Mariyam, the youngest.

“And we will chat a lot and never let him go,” adds Nargis Saifi, their mother.

Neha Dixit is an independent journalist based out of New Delhi. She covers politics, gender and social justice in South Asia.

No, the Shameful Attack on Sikhs in Kabul Still Doesn’t Justify the CAA

If India genuinely wants to protect vulnerable people in its neighbourhood, it needs to enact a wholesome asylum policy that doesn’t privilege one group of people over others, takes into account non-religious forms of persecution.

On March 25, three gunmen stormed the Guru Har Rai Gurudwara in the Shor Bazar area of Kabul, capital of Afghanistan, killing at least 25 and injuring 15. Most of the victims belonged the Sikh minority of Afghanistan. The Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), which is the Islamic State’s arm in Afghanistan and Pakistan, claimed the attack not long after the mindless bloodshed. The Indian government condemned Wednesday’s heinous attack in strong words, calling it “cowardly”.

While Sikhs have been targeted by Afghan militant groups in the past, this was certainly one of the biggest attacks on the minority in recent times.

Immediately after the attack, certain commentators and media houses began to push the importance of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) to protect the Sikh and Hindu communities in Afghanistan. The CAA, which came into force earlier this year, eases Indian citizenship requirements for asylum seekers from six religious denominations from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh who came to India on or before 31 December 2014. Sikhs are amongst those six beneficiary communities.

Also read: Islamic State Attack on Gurudwara in Kabul Leaves 25 Dead; India, US Condemn Strike

The CAA has come under intense criticism from domestic and international quarters for expressly leaving out Muslim refugees and thus, negating the constitutional principles of secularism and equality before law. Since it was tabled in parliament late last year, India has seen fierce street protests and civil unrest. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government has so far refused to recall the amendment.

After the attack, BJP leader from Delhi, Kapil Mishra, tweeted: “What would those who were distributing langar in Shaheen Bagh be thinking today?”

Mishra, who was banned by the Election Commission during the Delhi election campaign for a communally-loaded tweet, was not-so-subtly referring to the anti-CAA protestors who had been on a sit-in protest in East Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh area since 14 December. Sikh groups had set up langars (community kitchens) near the protest site to distribute free food, an act that received much praise. Mishra seemed to be suggesting that the Shaheen Bagh protestors, many of whom are Muslims, were responsible for the dastardly attack against Sikhs in Kabul.

Another pro-BJP commentator, Abhinav Prakash, who is also an assistant professor at Delhi University, tweeted that “all those opposing CAA are supporters & cheerleaders of such routine massacres.” Several other pro-Hindutva pages and voices argued how Wednesday’s attack proves that the CAA is much-needed. An editorial in the Free Press Journal argued that anti-CAA protestors “would not cry themselves hoarse against a law which neither directly nor indirectly seeks to hurt them” if they understood that “attacks on non-Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan are routine”.

These are highly misleading narratives that conceal not just the anti-constitutional nature of the CAA, but also the sociopolitical reality of Afghanistan. There is absolutely no doubt that the Sikh and Hindu minorities in Afghanistan are under constant threat of attacks by Islamist groups, such as the Taliban, ISKP and Haqqani Network.

Islamist extremism in Afghanistan

Only two years ago, a deadly suicide bombing in Jalalabad, capital of Nangarhar Province, killed Avtar Singh Khalsa, the only Sikh candidate running in the country’s parliamentary elections that year. They were no better off during the oppressive Taliban regime during 1996-2001. According to a recent report by the Afghan news agency, TOLO News, 99% of Hindus and Sikhs in Afghanistan left the country over the last three decades.

But Hindus and Sikhs are not the only religious minorities living in fear of extremist aggression in Afghanistan, a Sunni Muslim majority country. Muslim minority sects, such as the Shias, too are under constant threat of attacks by Islamist militants. According to informal third-party estimates, Shias make up about 10-15% of the population of Afghanistan. The bulk of Afghan Shias belong to the Hazara ethnic group.

An Afghan Sikh woman mourns for her relatives near the site of an attack in Kabul, Afghanistan March 25, 2020. Photo: Reuters/Mohammad Ismail

Only two weeks back, on March 6, ISKP claimed an attack on a Hazara ceremony in the Shi’ite-dominated Dasht-e-Barchi neighbourhood of Kabul, which killed 32 people. In September 2018, at least 22 people, mostly Hazaras, were killed in an ISKP-linked twin explosion in the same area. Two people were killed and forty injured in July 2019 when ISKP militants attacked a Shi’ite mosque in the central province of Ghazni. At least 143 people were killed in four separate ISKP-linked attacks on Shi’ite areas and mosques in the 2016-17 period.

According to Javed Kohistani, a retired Afghan general and political expert, Daesh “was formed mainly based on anti-Shiite agendas for taking over Shiite governments in Syria and Iraq”. Sectarian tensions between Afghan Sunnis and Shias started emerging around 2011, fuelled by a complex mix of external and internal factors. Since then, particularly after the ISKP’s entry, Shias have faced the full brunt of Islamist extremism in the country.

Also read: #NotInMyName, Say Kashmiris After ISIS Claims Kabul Attack Was Revenge for Kashmir

According to Rustam Ali Seerat, an Afghan research scholar in South Asian University, an “unholy alliance” between the Taliban and Daesh has put Afghan Shias and Hazaras in a high risk of “massacres and even annihilation”. The Shi’ite Hazaras aren’t just much-favoured targets for Islamist militants, but also subjects of systematic discrimination by the Afghan government.

“On the one hand, the terrorist groups target Hazaras with deadly attacks and, on the other hand, the Afghan government removes Hazaras from the government [posts] and tries to prevent Hazara areas from prosperity in development and economic policies,” says Ahmad Behzad, a Hazara in the Wolesi Jirga (lower house of the Afghan Parliament).

There is also evidence of Hazaras facing social discrimination within Sunni-majority Afghan society. Melissa Chiovenda, an anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Connecticut, told Al Jazeera in June 2016 that “even open-minded non-Hazaras with a high degree of education” admit that “they feel a certain discomfort when they encounter Hazaras in certain positions of authority in Afghanistan.”

Besides the Shi’ite minorities, the ISKP and Taliban are also accused of targeting Afghan Sunnis, both through targeted bombing of religious gatherings and politico-strategic attacks against government targets. Fair to say that the Afghan political-security landscape is far more complex than the straightforward ‘Muslims vs non-Muslims’ binary that pro-Hindutva groups in India routinely project.

Therefore, the fact that the CAA leaves out endangered Muslims, especially vulnerable sectarian minorities like the Shia Hazaras, is deeply problematic. India is already host to a significant population of Afghan Muslim refugees, including Shia Hazaras. Out of the 15,559 Afghan refugees registered with UNHCR India (according to the August 2019 factsheet), around 10% are Muslims, which includes Hazaras and other Shi’ite groups. The CAA won’t ease their pathway to Indian citizenship.

The current UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Michele Bachelet, also noted that the CAA discriminates against the Afghan Hazaras and Shia refugees in an intervention plea filed at the Supreme Court of India on March 4. Worse, the CAA also excludes under-threat Muslim sectarian minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh, such as Ahmadiyas and Bohras.

Also read: The World Has a Long Battle Ahead With the Idea of ISIS

Besides, contrary to what pro-Hindutva groups argue, the CAA’s retrospective cut-off date means that Hindus and Sikhs who are currently living in Afghanistan (such as those targeted in Wednesday’s attack) and would want to seek asylum in India in the future won’t be able to avail its exclusive benefits. It’ll only protect those who have already fled Afghanistan and are no more under Islamist threat.

The CAA is ultimately bad in law, as argued by top constitutional experts. Sure, it is some sort of an asylum law, but a grossly discriminatory one. If India genuinely wants to protect vulnerable people in its neighbourhood, it needs to enact a wholesome asylum policy that doesn’t privilege one group of people over others, takes into account non-religious forms of persecution (like ethnic and political) and doesn’t put a hard cut-off date.

The CAA doesn’t achieve that. It is nothing more than a sloppy, half-hearted and prejudicial piece of legislation that doesn’t have any place in a secular country like India.

Angshuman Choudhury is a Senior Researcher at the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi, and former GIBSA Visiting Fellow (Oct-Dec 2019) at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin.

NIA to Probe Afghanistan Gurudwara Terror Attack in First Overseas Case

This is the first case of its kind which the agency has registered after the recent amendments in the NIA Act which empower it to investigate terror cases that are committed at any place outside the country against Indian citizens.

New Delhi: Registering its first overseas case, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Wednesday filed an FIR to probe the terror attack on a gurudwara in Afghanistan”s capital Kabul last month that left 27 people including an Indian citizen dead.

This is the first case of its kind which the agency has registered after the recent amendments in the NIA Act which empower it to investigate terror cases that are committed at any place outside the country against Indian citizens or affecting the interest of India, the agency said in a statement.

The case was registered under various provisions of Indian Penal Code and anti-terror law.

Banned terror group Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), an offshoot of ISIS, claimed responsibility for the attack on March 25.

A Day After Gurudwara Terror Attack, Blast Near Cremation Site in Kabul

External affairs minister S. Jaishankar has said that he is “deeply concerned”.

New Delhi: A day after 25 persons were killed in a terror attack on a gurudwara in Kabul, a blast near the crematorium where the last rites of the victims were being held led the Indian government to express concern about the safety of the families.

On Wednesday morning, four terrorists burst into Gurudwara Guru Har Rai in Kabul and indiscriminately killed men, women and children at the complex. It took Afghan security forces six hours to kill the four men. In total, 25 persons died and eight were injured.

While the Islamic State took responsibility for the attack, but as per some media reports, the Afghan government is pointing the finger at Haqqani Network.

Also read: #NotInMyName, Say Kashmiris After ISIS Claims Kabul Attack Was Revenge for Kashmir

Even after a day after the tragedy, the tiny minority in Afghanistan was apparently again a target. As per Afghan media, there was a blast in a house near the Sikh crematorium. One girl was reportedly injured in the blast.


External affairs minister S. Jaishankar tweeted that he was “deeply concerned” at the instance of the blasts near the cremation site. “Our embassy has been in touch with Kabul security authorities. Have asked them to ensure adequate security onsite as well as safe return of families to their homes thereafter,” he posted.

Earlier, Jaishankar had said the Indian embassy was working to bring back the mortal remains of Indian national, Tian Singh, killed in the attack.

“Medical opinion is against moving the injured at this stage. The embassy is working on the return of mortal remains of Tian Singh. Will keep you updated,” he tweeted.

Tian Singh’s family, wife and son, had appealed to the prime minister to facilitate the return of his body to India to perform his last rites.

Meanwhile, India’s ambassador to Afghanistan Vinay Kumar had visited the gurudwara on Thursday and met with next of kin, who have been left devastated in the attack.

“Amb @vkumar1969 visited the gurudwara and met community leaders, elders and families of the victims of terrorist attack. He shared their grief and offered condolences. He was told that the injured are receiving satisfactory treatment,” the Indian embassy in Afghanistan said in a tweet.

India, US, Afghanistan and Pakistan have already condemned the attack in the strongest terms.

#NotInMyName, Say Kashmiris After ISIS Claims Kabul Attack Was Revenge for Kashmir

ISIS has been trying to raise its profile in Kashmir for a while now, but with limited success.

Srinagar: Hundreds of Kashmiri users took to social media on Thursday to condemn the carnage that unfolded in Kabul, Afghanistan where terrorists stormed a gurdwara, packed with worshippers, and killed 25 of them. The attackers also took worshippers hostage before Afghan forces killed them and ended the siege. At least one of the victims is a child.

The attack has been claimed by Islamic State’s Khorasan Province. Mina al Lami, a specialist on jihadist media at BBC Monitoring, tweeted about the group’s claim.

This was followed by the fresh tweet detailing the ISIS claim that the Kabul attack was retaliatory in nature, in response the situation in Kashmir.

Previously, Taliban had denied its involvement in the attack.

But minutes after the news appeared, hundreds of Kashmiri users flooded the internet with strong denunciations. “We Kashmiris strongly condemn such atrocities. Killing innocents in no way supports our struggle for existence,” wrote Munir Mufti, a Kashmiri user. “High time such people are identified and neutralised for centuries to come.”

Another user noted: “It was Sikhs who stood for the Kashmiri Muslims after Pulwama attack,” referring to the instances where Sikh volunteers had come to the aid of Kashmiri Muslims last year, when they faced evictions from landlords across the country and were also subjected to violence. As a means to reciprocate the generosity, Kashmiri Muslims had responded with offers of free bike rides, free medical check-ups, free hostel accommodations and even free admission in tuition centres.

By Thursday afternoon, Kashmiri users were seen trending #NotInMyName on Twitter.

ISIS has been trying to raise its profile in Kashmir and also across many parts of the world, in the wake of the depletion of territories under its control in the Middle East. Its formal presence ended in Syria and Iraq, where the group first reared its head in 2014, last year.

In May last year, ISIS introduced a separate branch dedicated to its operations in Kashmir named Wilayat-al-Hind. The announcement happened on the same day that one of the groups’ last surviving militants, Ishfaq Ahmad Sofi of Sopore, was killed by security forces.

ISIS flags have frequently surfaced at the funeral of slain militants. In November 2017, Mugees Mir who belongs to the outskirts of Srinagar city became the first militant whose body was draped with the ISIS flag. Mir was a deserter from Tehreek ul Mujahideen (TuM), a group from which numerous cadres changed affiliation to boost ISIS presence in Kashmir.

Also read: The World Has a Long Battle Ahead With the Idea of ISIS

The emergence of ISIS in Kashmir had surprisingly been timed with the reappearance of the TuM – whose role had declined during the early 2000s after many of its commanders were killed. Incidentally, many members of the ISJK killed so far during different gunfights in Kashmir have been at one point of time associated with the TuM. This also led the police to speculate whether the TuM was a shadow front designed to gradually introduce ISIS in Kashmir.

On June 22, 2018, security forces killed four ISIS militants during a gunfight at Srigufwara village in south Kashmir. They were Dawood Sofi from Zainakoot, Srinagar, Maajid Manzoor from Talangam, Pulwama, Ashraf Itoo and Aadil Hasan Mir from Srigufwara. Dawood, like Mugees Mir, had first joined TuM before he switched to the ISJK.

Recently, Delhi police raided on a house in Okhla, rounding up a Kashmiri married couple on allegations that they were affiliated ISIS’s Khorasan group – a charge their families have vehemently denied.

Kashmiri separatists have blasted ISIS in the past, saying it has no role to play in Kashmir dispute. In January last year, Mirwaiz Umer Farooq declared a day of mourning ‘Youm – e – Taqadus’ when purported ISIS supporters ‘desecrated’ the pulpit of mosque at Jama Masjid in Srinagar.

Kashmiri scholars and academics believe that even while Islam has remained an idiom of political mobilisation in Kashmir, it does not naturally translate into global jihadist ambitions. “Daesh [ISIS] has global ambitions, and by its very nature it is a perpetual war machine, which needs causes to latch on to and expand it footprints through local recruitment,” explains Muhammad Tahir, who teaches at the School of Law and Government, Dublin City University, Ireland and specialises in the Kashmir conflict.

“But, while it has had some success in a few African countries, and volatile Middle East (where it originated), Kashmir is not susceptible to its ideology because of peculiar social dynamics of Kashmir and the history and political orientation of the Kashmiri self-determination movement, which started in the early 20th century as a civil and political rights campaign under the slogan of “Responsible Government”, turned into a secular national liberation movement in the 1940s under the banner of Naya Kashmir manifesto, and after 1947 become a popular struggle for plebiscite,” he continues.

Islamist groups made inroads into Kashmir during the 1990s and attempted to blend in with the regional political movement which predates Partition. Yet, taking the religion-politics dichotomy for granted might be a slippery slope here.

“Muslims were lacking political consciousness in Kashmir and could not have been mobilised on complex political-economic grounds,” explained Altaf Hussian, a Kashmiri historian who authored the book The Making of Modern Kashmir. “Hence religion was effective instrument here. Also the Dogra state not only drew on the symbols of the Hindu religion to bolster its right to rule but also categorised its subjects on the basis of their religious affiliation. Naturally, as Muslims came to challenge it, they defined themselves on oppositional terms to it, emphasising their ‘Islamic identity.’ It continues to this day.”

Kashmir’s slide towards more radical Islamic vocabulary came as a consequence of the 1975 accord that Sheikh Abdullah signed with Indira Gandhi, which constrained his powers and bound up the former state more tightly with the Indian Union, complicating its resolution as per the UN-backed referendum.

Also read: Deleting IS’s Digital Caliphate

The decision sent shockwaves across Kashmir and Sheikh, who once epitomised the politics of self-determination, became a reviled figure. His contemporaries were the Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) that had no political capital at the time. They won only one seat in the 1977 elections. Yet, the JeI slowly filled this political vacuum and its armed wing Hizbul Mujahideen later managed to decimate the non-sectarian Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) from the armed arena during the 1990s when the insurgency erupted.

During the 1920s, when the Khilafat movement emerged in India, there was little to no reaction in Kashmir to the Ottoman caliphate’s abrogation, let alone attempts to restore it. As scholar Chitralekha Zutshi has noted in Languages of Belonging, “Despite the preponderantly Muslim population, the Khilafat slogan did not seem to arouse the passions it did in the other parts of British India.”

But today, smalltime groups are placing Khilafat at the centre of their political appeal. There is a more complex interplay of politics involved here than just ‘religious radicalisation.’

When this reporter inquired at the house of Ishfaq Sofi as to the reasons for his enrolment into militancy, his family alleged that the Special Operations Group (SOG) has tortured him once due to which his arm never healed. His mother also died of a heart attack in 2007, when the forces came to pick him off. In the case of Dawood Sofi, the TuM deserter-turned-IS militant, observers suspect he might have been angry over the killing of his cousin Gowhar Nazir, who was hit by bullet during a protest in 2016.

“Idiom of religion allowed political expression in the absence of political space, which was tightly controlled by the state,” Tahir says. “Even when the idiom of jihad was employed by the Kashmiri insurgency, it was a localised phenomenon, whose objectives remained confined to the framework of Kashmiri self-determination.”

Why Congress Should Tie up With JAYS, the Adivasi Movement in MP That Began on Facebook

A socio-political movement, Jai Adivasi Yuva Shakti is creating a ripple in the districts of west Madhya Pradesh ahead of the state’s assembly elections, and has spurred the dream of creating a leadership of adivasis – for adivasis.

Dr Hiralal Alawa represents the contrarian trend among the beneficiaries of reservation who secure government jobs, join the teeming urban middle class, and sunder their links with the marginal community to which they belong. Few take the trajectory Alawa took – he chose to leave the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Science, Delhi, to return to his home village of Bheslai, in Kukshi tehsil of Dhar district, Madhya Pradesh.

Kukshi has become the epicentre of the Jai Adivasi Yuva Shakti, a socio-political movement, which Alawa spearheads. Popularly known by its acronym JAYS, it began as a Facebook page that Alawa created in 2012. His was an attempt to instill self-respect and pride in tribal youths. It is evident from his explanation to affix Jai to Adivasi Yuva Shakti: “We are treated as animals, yet we do jai-jai [hail] of others. It is time we began praising ourselves.”

His pitch found an instant echo among the educated, either already beneficiaries of reservation or studying to take competitive examinations for entering professional colleges or securing government jobs. Discussions on Facebook gradually widened to include issues such as the skewed nature of development and the pressing need to build a leadership owing allegiance to adivasis than to the national parties.

JAYS acquired ample traction in social media to leap out from the virtual world to land in Madhya Pradesh’s tribal heartland. On May 16, 2013, Alawa convened a panchayat of his Facebook followers in Barwani. Over 3,000 people attended. “The consensus was that our current leaders are failing us – they are not taking up the issues of unemployment, malnutrition, the absence of educational infrastructure, or question the manipulation of our cultural identity,” Alawa recalled. 

The success at Barwani inspired Alawa to summon yet another panchayat in October in Indore. The 2013 assembly elections were a month away, and JAYS asked students staying in hostels to turn down politicians whose wont it was to offer them money to campaign for them. “These are the politicians who supply daru [alcohol], murga [chicken], and paisa (money) to adivasis to get their votes. We gave a call to make videos of these illegitimate activities,” Alawa said with a chuckle.

Five years later, JAYS is creating a ripple in the districts of west Madhya Pradesh, where adivasis account for roughly 45% of its population. For instance, adivasis comprise 87% of Jhabua’s population; in Barwani nearly 70%. No wonder its rallies have been quite a draw – for instance, the kisan panchayat it held in Kukshi on October 2 pulled in an estimated lakh of people. The support that JAYS has elicited has spurred the dream of creating a leadership of adivasis – for adivasis. It has prepared a list of 80 constituencies from where it plans to contest in the forthcoming November assembly elections.

Also read: Why Failure to Form an Alliance With BSP in MP Shouldn’t Worry Congress

Simultaneously, JAYS is in parleys with the Congress for forging an electoral alliance. It has demanded 40 seats for itself, but is willing to settle for less than one-fourth of it – and also contest these on the Congress symbol. It’s a case of tempering exuberance with reality.

JAYS will want to enter the assembly to demonstrate that its representatives are made of different mettle. Yet it hasn’t developed sinews to take on the national parties on its own. But fight it will, either as part of an electoral alliance or alone.

Dr Anand Rai, the prominent whistleblower in the Vyapam scam who has joined JAYS and is counted among its principal strategists, said, “We want to align with the Congress because we too want to fight for secularism and battle corruption, of which the Bharatiya Janata Party is guilty in Madhya Pradesh. Also, we do not have the funds required to fight elections nor are our party structures firmly in place. Yet there is tremendous pressure from our supporters to fight the Assembly elections. Our experience will train us for the future.”

But what is mere experience for JAYS could well turn out ominous for the BJP and the Congress. Political scientist APS Chauhan, of Jiwaji University, Gwalior, pointed out, “JAYS and Gondwana Ganatantra Party [another tribal outfit] are like unguided missiles – you just can’t tell which party they might hit.” Likewise, Yatindra Singh Sisodia, director, Madhya Pradesh Institute of Social Science Research, Ujjain, said, “JAYS could well play a decisive role in determining who wins and who doesn’t in as many as 28 assemblies constituencies.”

JAYS has harnessed the virtual world’s tools to bring together an articulate segment among adivasis to froth and fume at the incessant exploitation by those in whom they reposed their faith and hope.

In a way then, JAYS is the adivasi version of #MeToo and last year’s Not In My Name, both of which the middle class elite in metros initiated as social media campaigns that eventually spilled out in the real world.  JAYS represents the imagination of the adivasi middle class that reservation has spawned. Like the better known social media campaigners, JAYS has harnessed the virtual world’s tools to bring together an articulate segment among adivasis to froth and fume at the incessant exploitation by those in whom they reposed their faith and hope.

Unlike #MeToo and Not In My Name campaigners, though, JAYS’ appeal is far wider because it quickly created structures to bring under its umbrella the aspiring adivasi youth wishing to become middle class. It is these students who go to their villages to explain to the elderly why they should support JAYS. There is also a cultural perspective to their rage and activism. “Education and jobs through reservation do lead to assimilation. But it can also lead to an acute awareness of threats to a group’s cultural identity and the need to preserve it,” Sisodia said.

The search for identity

Anxieties over identity are triggered through a complicated process. Born to a school teacher and anganwadi worker, Alawa experienced the stings of stigmatisation when he left home to join a high school in Susari village, where he stayed in hostel. He and other tribal children were derided for their inability to speak Hindi flawlessly. “They used to call us adibasis, not adivasis. The word adivasi means dwellers from ancient times. On the other hand, basi means stale as in basi food,” Alawa reminisced.

In 2001, Alawa shifted to Indore to join one of its coaching shops. The glitz and shine of urban India provided him a frame of reference to feel anguished at the deplorable, exploitative conditions in which his community languished in. After completing his MBBS in Rewa and MD from Gwalior, which was where he adopted the identity of Jai Adivasi Yuva Shakti for his Facebook posts, Alawa shifted to Delhi, where he did three years of senior residency in AIIMS. He was contracted for a year as assistant professor in rheumatology. “Though the contract ended in December 2016, it could have been extended. But I decided to return to Madhya Pradesh.”

The decision to leave Delhi was largely because the city only deepened his anguish at the plight of his people. Alawa evoked the imagery of speed to explain the difference between the India he had come out from to reside in the India where he worked. “In Delhi, life is hellishly hectic; people don’t have time to spare. In adivasi villages, life is slow; people play cards to kill time,” Alawa said.

The slowness of life back home was symptomatic of a deeper malaise – the lack of agency advisasis have in determining the kind of existence they should have. It was to win back for his people the right to imagine their own world that Alawa began to organise panchayats far more frequently on his return to Madhya Pradesh than what he used to from distant Delhi.

One such panchayat impressed Rai to no end. Having already met Alawa after reading a media account of him, Rai decided to join JAYS, which embraced him enthusiastically because of the fame he had acquired for blowing the lid off the Vyapam scam. An OBC, Rai symbolises the attempt of JAYS to widen its adivasi base to include other subaltern groups. 

About the panchayat he first attended, Rai said, “There were speakers from outside. There were motivational speeches. The audience was explained the importance of the Fifth Schedule, the provisions of PESA or the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, the Forest Rights Act and such like. I felt JAYS could well be the vehicle for change.”

Also read: Is Congress Worried About a Rejuvenated BSP?

Alawa feels most of these Acts, designed for the welfare of Scheduled Tribes, have not been implemented or are infringed with impunity. For instance, the Fifth Schedule provides for a 20-member Tribal Advisory Council to advise the government in states having scheduled areas. Tribal MLAs are to constitute 15 of the 20 members of the Council; the remaining five from civil society representatives.

“The tendency is to appoint all 20 members from the ruling party,” said Alawa. “They agree to whatever the government wants.” The consequence is that the government imposes its own idea of development and welfare on adivasis. For instance, the Madhya Pradesh government constructed pucca houses under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna. These remain unduly hot until late night, compelling people to sleep outside. Toilets have been built in front of dwelling units, leading to these not being used at all.

“Our idea of development is different. It does not mean having ACs and cars,” said Alawa. “Simultaneously, in the name of development, the BJP government has appropriated more land of adivasis in 15 years than what had been done in the previous decades by the Congress.”

Credit: PTI/Ravi Choudhary

Communal temperatures

A uniform development model for the entire country homogenises the diversity of lifestyles. This is compounded in tribal areas because of cultural interventions that seek to transform their very being and create the new adivasi. Imitating the strategy of Christian missionaries who are said to have brought education and healthcare to tribal areas for evangelical purposes, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has sought to Hinduise the adivasi. “We are opposed to all attempts to change our identity. Without identity, our wajud [presence] will end.”

The attempts to Hinduise adivasis is not confined to the ideational level alone. It is also through the strategy of creating conflicts between Hindus and Muslims. According to Alawa, RSS affiliates trigger communal tension and skirmishes and instigate adivasis to engage in violence. “I have been asking people what harm Muslims have done to them that they want to fight them… Our biggest foe, anyway, is the RSS.”

JAYS gets a thumbs up from Ishrat Ali, who heads the Qazi Council of Madhya Pradesh. “JAYS has re-established the idea of brotherhood in the area. This is a consequence of having an educated leadership. Alawa understands why there is an attempt to replace the flowers of many colours that comprise India’s cultural bouquet with that of one colour.”

There is a structural reason why there is a lowering of communal temperature in west Madhya Pradesh’s tribal belt. “Fact is a lot of adivasis have deserted RSS affiliates to join JAYS. At many places, RSS is unable to hold its shakhas,” Rai said.

In many ways then, JAYS is waging a battle that the Congress should have fought. That alone should be a reason for India’s grand old party to grant a handful of seats to JAYS. It is not just about notching a significant electoral victory before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, but also about rallying small groups sharing ideological similarities to fight for India’s soul.

Ajaz Ashraf is a journalist based in Delhi.

‘Those Who Spread Hatred Cannot Win’: Hundreds Protest Handling of Kathua, Unnao Rape Cases

“Silence is no longer an option.”

New Delhi: Hundreds of people took to the streets in multiple cities across India to protest against the Modi government’s lack of action against the accused in the gang rape of an eight-year-old girl in Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir and of a minor girl in Unnao, Uttar Pradesh.

A young woman holds up a sign at Sunday’s ‘Not in My Name’ protest against the Kathua and Unnao rapes. Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

Despite the level of brutality in both cases, BJP leaders either unambiguously stood in defence of the accused or went out of their way to evade questions.

“Silence is no longer an option. If we do not speak today, those who spread hatred, those who want to break the country, those who want to destroy the Constitution, will win.”, the appeal for Sunday’s protest said. Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

After facing flak for his silence, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday said, “The incidents of the recent days are a challenge to social justice. The incidents which have been in public discussion the past two days would be considered shameful by any civilised society. As a society and as a country we should feel ashamed.”

A view of Sunday’s protest. Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

Curiously, Modi refrained from referring to Kathua or Unnao by name, adding that such incidents are an attack on human values regardless of the state or area they have occurred. In Kathua, policemen that were supposed to be investigating the case stand implicated, while a politician from the ruling BJP is the main accused in Unnao.

“Now that all the accused in the Kathua case have been arrested and a detailed charge sheet filed, and it is up to courts to judge the matter, what does he mean by saying that none of the guilty in the crime would be spared? They have already been arrested and put in jail,” a former IAS officer wrote on social media. Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

“The incidents of the recent days are a challenge to social justice. The incidents which have been in public discussion the past two days would be considered shameful by any civilised society. As a society and as a country we should feel ashamed,” Modi added.

“The horses returned home, unable to tell/ How the gods died in a poisoned temple.” – from ‘The Nomad’s Daughter’, a poem by Manash Firaq Bhattacharjee. Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

The protests in Delhi were organised under the ‘Not in My Name’ banner.

The organisers held similar countrywide protests in 2017 to raise their voice against increasing incidents of communal violence against minorities.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

“Silence is no longer an option. If we do not speak today, those who spread hatred, those who want to break the country, those who want to destroy the Constitution, will win. We cannot let them win. For if they win, we lose our country. If they win, we lose our dream of an India that promised equality, liberty and fraternity to all its citizens,” reads the pamphlet circulated by the ‘Not in My Name’ organisers.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

“Muslims live in fear of the shape of the next round of attacks, even as the rights of Dalits and adivasis enshrined in the Constitution are being questioned. And today, the impunity of those in power makes them defend the rape of women and even of an 8-year-old girl. Those in power shield raposts and take out marches to defend the brutal rape and killing of a child who was targeted simply because she was a Muslim,” it added.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

In Delhi, the protestors had four demands:

One, the immediate dismissal of the Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh for protecting a rapist and for abetting the death in police custody of the father of the rape victim in Unnao.

Two, the immediate arrest of two BJP ministers who led rallies of the Hindu Ekta Manch in Kathua, for hate speech and creating enmity between people.

Three, the immediete arrest of all Hindu Ekta Manch office bearers and leaders for hate speech.

And four, immediete security arrangements for all the families of the victims, and state support for arranging a competent prosecution team.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

Protestors from different age groups thronged Parliament Street in Delhi, Bandra in Mumbai, Chandigarh, Bengaluru and Ajmer as many gave rousing speeches, recited poems and sang ‘Hum honge kamiyab (we shall overcome)’.

Meanwhile, the CBI made a second arrest in the Unnao rape case on Saturday as it detained the woman who allegedly took the victim to BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar on the day of crime.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

Modi’s Handling of Kathua, Unnao Rape Cases an ‘Existential Crisis’

Holding him responsible for the “terrifying state of affairs”, 49 retired civil servants, in an open letter on Sunday, urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to reach out to families of Kathua and Unnao rape victims to “seek their forgiveness”.

Credit: Karnika Kohli/The Wire

“Given your supremacy within the party and the centralised control you and your party president exercise, you more than anyone else have to be held responsible for this terrifying state of affairs … We have had enough of these belated remonstrations and promises to bring justice when the communal cauldron is forever kept boiling by forces nested within the Sangh Parivar,” they added.

‘Credit goes to people of India, not Modi’

In a message on social media, another former IAS officer wrote that he was “stunned” by the news headlines, “PM Modi Silences Critics On Rape Cases, 2 Ministers Quit Soon After”. In fact, credit for the resignations of J&K Industries Minister Chandra Prakash Ganga and Forest Minister Lal Singh, and the arrest of Kuldeep Singh Sengar, the main accused in the Unnao rape case, “goes to the people of India, not PM Modi.”

Had PM Modi taken cognisance of the Kathua case when it occurred in January and the two ministers participated in the Hindu Ekta March in favour of accused, and acted against them, I would have saluted him. Had he taken action when BJP Ministers were continuously interfering in the investigations and investigations team changed several times, I would have saluted him. It was because of their ministers’ continued interference in investigations that advocate Deepika Singh Rajawat had to file a PIL in the Jammu High Court to request a court monitored investigation… Had he intervened at that stage, I would have saluted him. In that case Deepika wouldn’t have to file the PIL. Then the Jammu Bar Association started threatening Deepika from contesting the case… The leading members of the Jammu Bar Association are affiliated with the BJP. Had [Modi] asked them to stop and let Deepika do her job without interference, I would have saluted him…

Now that all the accused in the Kathua case have been arrested and a detailed charge sheet filed, and it is up to courts to judge the matter, what does he mean by saying that none of the guilty in the crime would be spared? They have already been arrested and put in jail. I would have still given him some credit if those ministers had been “dismissed” from the cabinet. But no, they were given a respectful exit through their “resignations”.

In the Unnao case … even the attempt of suicide by the rape victim in front of the chief minister’s residence didn’t wake up the PM. He maintained a studied silence in the hope that this too shall pass. But some enlightened citizens and lawyers filed a PIL in the Allahabad High Court which ordered Sengar’s arrest.

The Call From Gujarat: BJP Can Be Undone in 2019

Will the opposition take up the big challenge facing India’s cultural and social fabric?

Will the opposition take up the big challenge facing India’s cultural and social fabric?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah flash victory sign at a felicitation function before the party’s parliamentary board meeting in New Delhi on Monday, after the party’s win in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh Assembly elections. Credit: PTI/Shahbaz Khan

Besides handing out a formal victory to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for the sixth consecutive term, emulating the Left Front’s record in West Bengal, the assembly elections in Gujarat have sent out some other calls as well. Two of these inter-related ones are the announcement of Rahul Gandhi’s arrival as a serious challenger and the vulnerability of the BJP in free and fair elections of 2019.

Gandhi has finally shed his reluctance to take on the task of reviving his party and has thrown himself full time into it with all his energy. Far more significant is the fact that during his extensive Gujarat campaign, he refused to react to the agenda set by the BJP, spearheaded by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which had nearly become the norm since around 2012-13. He was constantly setting his own agenda and forcing Modi to respond to it. Modi did so by jumping from one wild allegation to another inconsistently, in a characteristic attempt to divert attention from the sharp attacks on the disaster brought about by his “reformist” measures. Gandhi had obviously given considerable thought to setting his own agenda: focus on the economy on behalf of those who had suffered most over the past three years and a half and to sidestep the question of his religious identity as irrelevant to the electoral battle by visiting temples, if a bit clumsily. His constant refrain was the favours given by the Modi government to “five or six” corporate houses and the wilful neglect of the poor farmers, the small businesses, the tribals and the daily wage earners, i.e. the “masses”. Even as he mocked Modi and the government, his language was never below par, unlike on the other side. This too may have earned him some approval rating. By aligning the Congress with three angry though raw young men venting pent up social anger against the present dispensation, Gandhi also showed the maturity of a seasoned politician in forging alliances for electoral victories so far taken as an exclusive Modi-Amit Shah preserve. All in all, he stood up with his feet firmly on the ground. And he landed up with respectable results for it. He has demonstrated that he is his own man. Victory and defeat are after all relative terms.


Also read: The Modi Juggernaut Has Been Halted


The Modi-Shah triumphant march to claim 150 seats out of 182 on the other hand was given a short shrift by confining their party to 99, just above the half way mark. Of course 150 would be dismissed by Shah as a “chunavi jumla” much like the promise of 15 lakhs, i.e. not to be taken seriously. The dividing line between a serious electoral promise of the BJP and a non-serious “chunavi jumla” is getting harder to detect. Problem of credibility? At any rate, the Gujarat elections did show that alternative agendas have replaced a single agenda.

Rahul Gandhi. Credit: Facebook/Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi. Credit: Facebook/Rahul Gandhi

Where do Congress and Gandhi go from here? Not being a committed Congress supporter, I could fairly announce “none of my concern”; but as citizens it does concern us all whether we are being led in one direction or another by our political class. We would thus expect that Gandhi, besides sharpening his focus on the economy, would also take up another, perhaps even graver, challenge to the integrity of the Indian nation posed by the Sangh parivar: the assault of Hindutva on bharatiyata. The BJP did raise its hackles during the elections over Gandhi’s religious identity and he sought to respond to it by overly demonstrating his Hindu, even janeu wearing, self, the conventional soft Hindutva response to hard Hindutva. A very defensive soft Hindutva at best, much like attempting to win over the hardcore Mullahs by quoting the Quran and the hadees to them. Even at a personal level, at least three strands of religious identity mark Gandhi’s being: the Kashmiri Pandit, the Parsi and the Catholic, and to foreground one of the three is not the most honest or even endearing act. But far more important is the identity of Indian-ness, bharatiyata, which is by its nature inclusive and antithetical to a single exclusive religious identity. When asked by the Sangh Parivar to prove his religious identity in Gujarat, if he had responded with “My religion is bharatiyata”, the questioner would have probably run for cover. But unfortunately that chance was missed.

With as much energy as Gandhi put into his Gujarat campaign, highlighting the economic distress unleashed by the Modi government, he needs to now pick up on the other equally major disaster being wreaked upon India by the same forces. The economy can perhaps recover in a short or medium span but the damage to India’s cultural and social fabric would be far more durable and deadening.


Also read: Gujarat’s Voters Are BJP’s Greatest Strength – and Its Biggest Weakness


This needs to be taken up as an urgent campaign around the country, a campaign that is inclusive of all whose hearts beat for the nation. And one cannot wait until the dates of the next elections are announced to start this campaign. It is not hard to imagine that the electoral process and this campaign are intimately intertwined. The BJP’s Hindutva card is its chosen pathway to electoral victory; the bharatiyata campaign should be a counterpoint, a breaking of the link between religious identity and the political process. A bharatiyata that is not partisan to any segment, not weighted for or against any group of citizens. A campaign to proclaim: proud to be Indian.

Civil society has already initiated some baby steps in this direction by launching campaigns like Not in My Name and Say No to Hatred which evoked massive response across the country, even as the initiatives were taken through spontaneous rather than organised action. The ground support for an organised and sustained campaign is ready. Will Gandhi, the Congress, and others take up this bigger challenge? This, among other actions, will be an important step towards rejuvenating the 132-year-old party.

Harbans Mukhia taught history at Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Not in My Name: Delhi Gathers to Condemn Rajasthan Hacking

Poets, academics and others gathered to protest the rising tide of hatred and violence across the country.

Poets, academics and others gathered to protest the rising tide of hatred and violence across the country.

The stage on Parliament Street. Credit: The Wire

New Delhi: Delhi on Wednesday evening witnessed another citizen’s protest under the ‘Not in My Name’ campaign, titled ‘Nafrat ke khilaf hum sab ki awaaz’ against the murder of Afrazul Khan in Rajasthan and the rising tide of hatred in the country.

“I am Muslim, I am India,” was the protestors’ clear message, urging citizens to stand up against the spate of violence erupting in different parts of the country.

The protest started with an address by Saba Dewan, founder of the Not in My Name campaign, demanding the immediate dismissal of the Vasundhara Raje government in Rajasthan. Expressing shock at the at the culture of impunity, the documentary filmmaker said that it is the administration’s abstinence from taking steps that has encouraged the perpetrators to continue their violence. “Today, what is at stake is not the unity and integrity of the country, which it is, but it is our humanity that is on the verge of being lost,” she said, speaking to The Wire. 

The gathering holding placards of ‘Say no to violence’. Credit: The Wire

Journalist Pankaj Srivastava, who has also been associated with the campaign from its start, said the promises we made to ourselves when the constitution was created have been lost. “These are troubling times that reflect the state of our society. These times are a wake-up call for Hindus to rescue their ‘sanatan Hindu dharma’ from the attack of the Hindutva, which is in fact nothing but a political ideology,” he said.

The gathering holding placards of ‘Say no to violence’. Credit: The Wire

Venu, who heads a non-profit organisation for communities to raise voices in rural areas, said, “We have become a people of social media, I don’t understand why everyday conversations about such brutality are not happening. I am here because I’m afraid that the consequences could be worse,” she told The Wire.

Urdu poet Gulzar Dhelvi, speaking at the protest, talked of Indian culture that has always accepted people of all castes, religions, faith, creed and gender, and how far we have come from it. He asked the hate mongers to “Go back and read what your religion preaches.”

The silent protest saw about a hundred people from all walks of life. Falak, a documentary film-maker, said that she wishes to contribute in the struggle by reaching out to as many people as possible and ask them to not spread hatred.

Protestors holding placards of ‘Nafrat ke khilaf hum sab ki awaaz‘ (left), Urdu poet Gulzar Dhelvi during his speech. Credit: The Wire

Mohammad Aamir Khan, co-author of Framed As a Terrorist: My 14-Year Struggle to Prove My Innocence, said that he fears the kind of India his three-and-a-half-year-old daughter will grow up to see.

Similar protests were also held in Bhopal and Bengaluru yesterday.

Under the Not In My Name banner, protests had earlier been organised against the killing of teenager Junaid and of journalist Gauri Lankesh.

Shreya Valiramani is a final year student at Jindal Global Law School, Sonepat, Haryana, and an intern with The Wire.

Delhi Gathers Once Again For #NotInMyName Vigil Against Amarnath Yatra Killings

“The seven killed in Kashmir were only bystanders in the conflict, and we must stand up and demand an end to this politics of hatred.”

“The seven killed in Kashmir were only bystanders in the conflict, and we must stand up and demand an end to this politics of hatred.”

Not in my name

#NotInMyName vigil on July 11 in Delhi’s Jantar Mantar against the Amarnath Killings in Kashmir. Credit: The Wire

New Delhi: Following the killing of the seven Hindu pilgrims on the Amarnath yatra in Kashmir yesterday, citizens today came together once again in Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, in solidarity and against hatred, with placards saying ‘I condemn #AmarnathYatraKilling #NotInMyName’ and ‘Peace is the only way’.

Not in my name

Placards at the Jantar Mantar vigil. Credit: The Wire

The statement issued on behalf of the #NotInMyName campaign was as follows:

“We are saddened by the news that seven pilgrims on their way back from the Amarnath yatra in Kashmir have been killed in an armed attack last night. The Jammu and Kashmir police has issued a statement that the attack was on a police van and the yatris in a bus following, died while the fleeing attackers fired indiscriminately. The Amarnath yatris have never feared an attack even when the situation in the Valley was at its worst. People in Kashmir have always taken pride in the fact that the yatra was always safe. It is tragic that this faith and trust today stands vitiated by elements who clearly want to kick-start a chain of incidents that will bring more tragedies, more deaths and more hatred.

Not in my name

Protesters who came together at Jantar Mantar. Credit: The Wire

“As citizens, we must intervene in this situation. We mourn the death of those civilians who were killed and we also take a firm stand against political violence, no matter who the perpetrator. Kashmiris in the Valley have been caught in a vortex of violence and it was only last year that we were faced with hundreds of disturbing images of young people carrying pellet wounds over with bodies. All lives matters. And the dead bodies should not become a part of the politics that divides people on the basis of religion. The seven killed in Kashmir were only bystanders in the conflict, and only when we stand up and demand an end to this politics of hatred, that we can prevent the deaths of innocents, whether on a pilgrimage, or returning from Eid shopping.

We call upon all citizens to ensure peace and resist any call to further violence.”

Watch: The Wire‘s video coverage of the vigil:

Watch: The Wire’s video coverage of the vigil in Hindi: