Tensions Brew on Eve of Bhima Koregaon Violence Anniversary

It is exactly a year since a mob, allegedly from the Maratha community and followers of Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote, attacked Ambedkarite pilgrims.

Bhima Koregaon (Maharashtra): Tension is still palpable in the air as police vans zip through the streets of Bhima Koregaon, 30 kilometres north-east of Pune. Huge numbers of personnel, both from Pune and the state reserve force, have been deployed along the nine-kilometer stretch on both sides of the Vijay Stambh (obelisk), just outside the Koregaon Bhima village. The police administration says the situation is “peaceful” but the underlying tension is evident.

Every year, lakhs of Dalits gather here on January 1, the anniversary of a historic battle won by the British Army in 1818 – largely comprised of soldiers from the Dalit community – against the Peshwa regime ruled by the Brahmin King Baji Rao II.

The Third Anglo-Maratha war, of which the Battle of Bhima Koregaon was a part, helped the British establish their rule in large parts of Western India. For the Dalit community, however, this history is crucial to their struggle against untouchability.

Vijay Stambh (memorial pillar) inside the Bhima Koregaon Memorial site. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

Exactly a year ago a mob, allegedly belonging to the Maratha community and staunch followers of Hindutva leaders – Manohar alias Sambhaji Bhide and Milind Ekbote – attacked the Ambedkarite pilgrims (followers of Dr B.R. Ambedkar) near the Vijay Stambh. Several vehicles were burnt, people were assaulted and houses in the five villages around the Vijay Stambh were set on fire. The attack triggered protests and shut-downs across the state, causing arrests of over 10,000 Bahujan youths.

The community, like every year, is expected to gather here in a large number this year too. For the first time, however, locals say the zeal that was felt each year has now changed into unnecessary stress.

“The five- six villages around Bhima Koregaon are a part of the long-standing Bahujan history. From what used to be a matter of immense pride and fervour has transformed into a burden,” says Latabai Shirsat, a local Dalit-rights activist belonging to the Jogendra Kawade-led ‘Peoples Republican Party’.

Shirsat is also a member of the district Mahila Dakshata Samiti (women vigil committee) and is required to closely participate in legal cases pertaining to women. But since the January 1 incident, she says, she and other political activists in the region are looked at with suspicion. “Police have been surveilling each of our moves; our conversations, travels, meetings… everything is tracked. Our people (people belonging to Dalit communities) were targets of the riot on January 1, but if you ask around, it is only our people who were criminalised and stigmatised,” she adds.

The police, this year, has taken “preventive action” and have restricted several political fronts from entering the space. Among them are the Samasta Hindu Agha President and Hindutva leader Milind Ekbote, Shiv Prathistan Hindustan leader Sambhaji Bhide and members of Kabir Kala Manch. Several local youths, who were externed from the village after the riots on January 1, have been warned against entering the village this year.

Pune police, over the past few months, has claimed to have unearthed a “Maoist conspiracy” to kill Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Ten human rights lawyers and activists, branded as “urban Naxals” by the Pune police, were arrested early this year, and have since been charged with sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for criminal conspiracy and terror activities.

Caste tension continues

As The Wire travelled across the six villages – Bhima Koregaon, Sanaswadi, Shikrapur, Perne gaon, Vadhu Budruk and Loni Kand village – on December 30, villagers shared stories of animosity and caste tension.  There is a clear difference in the narratives set by the Dalit and the rest of the villagers, especially the Marathas. The Dalit community insists that although violent attacks have not occurred since the January 1 riot, the village is no longer a safe place for them. Marathas and other OBC community people say a lot has been done to “improve bhaichara (brotherhood)” among different communities.

Latabai Shirsat (right) and other political activists of Peoples Republican Party at Perne Goan. Shrisat says Dalit rights activists have been unfairly targeted by the police. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

The “police action” is the main highlight of every conversation in the villages and newspaper coverage. Local papers have carried detailed reports about the arrangements made by the police this year – drone cameras, metal detectors, CCTV along the entire Pune-Ahmednagar highway where these villages fall, and prior permission for stalls and hoardings to be set up at the Vijay Stambh.

In Sanaswadi village, a few elderly men from the Dalit community – all Buddhists – gather at the Nalanda Buddha Vihara in the afternoon. A few moments later, some policemen and men from other communities also join the gathering. Such meetings have been common in the past month. One villager says even the district Superintendent of Police, Sandip Patil, had visited village twice to appeal to the villagers to maintain peace.

“The police have been keeping vigil and ensuring no untoward incident happens in the village again. The situation was terrible last year. Several houses of Dalits were set on fire. One Maratha boy and two Dalit men were killed too,” says Sudhamrao Pawar, an elderly man in his 90s. Pawar carries the legacy of having met Ambedkar when he visited the Vijay Stambh in 1927 – the first notable commemoration at the Vijay Stambh.

Sudhamrao Pawar (second from left) along with his sons at Nalanda Buddha Vihara on Sanaswadi. This village was the worse affected in January 1 riots. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

The Maratha boy, Pawar mentions, is 28-year-old Rahul Fathangale, who was killed by a mob. While his mother continues to live in the village, other members of his family have already moved to Pune. When this reporter was visiting the village, Pathangale’s mother too had gone to Pune. “She was afraid reporters would come looking for her. So, her elder son took her away to Pune,” a local said.

Pawar’s son Nitin, who lives in Mumbai but travels to the village every year during this time, says: “It is not so much about the possible attack but the animosity and the brimming hatred towards our people that worries us.” Small skirmishes and disputes over land, water and other basic amenities continue to happen and they have only increased over the past year, he elaborates. “Each time a Dalit makes even negligible progress, they (Marathas) find ways to pull him down. They can’t see us flourish,” he claims, further adding that there have been regular disputes at the village Panchayat level.

‘External forces’ provoked the Marathas

Niwrutti Yadav, a Maratha man from the village, however, says “Those were external forces who influenced the Maratha men and who caused riots in the village last year. Every community co-existed without any tension and since that unfortunate incident, people have become wiser. We are trying to not let people from the outside meddle with out village peace,” Yadav said.

Yadav was hinting at the intrusion, felt by most other villagers, by Bhide and Ekbote. The riots, as most independent fact finding teams and locals have claimed, were “well- planned” and allegedly orchestrated by men belonging to Dharmaveer Sambhaji Maharaj Smruti Samiti – an organisation floated by Hindutva activist Milind Ekbote in 2004 – which has been accused of provoking Hindus, especially the Maratha youth, against the Dalit community. Most activities were carried under the banner of this organisation or the Hindu Janjagran Samiti – the parent organisation also headed by Ekbote.

Also read: A Reporter Saw the Bhima Koregaon Violence Coming. Now, He Fears For His Life.

While Ekbote has been named in three FIRs, in two of them, Manohar alias Sambhaji Bhide, president of the Shiv Pratishthan and an influential Hindutva leader, has been named as a “co-conspirator of the violence” which led to the death of at least three youths, left scores injured and caused an estimated loss of Rs 1.5 crore to public property. Ekbote was arrested and let off on bail, but Bhide was not.

Both Ekbote and Bhide have been restricted from entering the region. But at Vadhu Budruk, the place where the actual tension began, villagers says Ekbote has visited the village on several occasions, discreetly.

New police chowkies have been built outside Bhima Koregaon and neighbouring villages which saw severe violence on January 1, 2018. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

Vadhu Budruk, around 3.5 kilometres from Bhima Koregaon, is well-known for its 17th-century history of King Sambhaji’s final rites being carried out by a Dalit man – Baba Govind Gopal Gaikwad – when others failed to come forward fearing a backlash from Mughal emperor Aurangazeb.

The villagers later built Gaikwad’s tomb next to  King Sambhaji’s and it has been a pilgrimage site since. It is alleged this spot belongs to Gaikwads but has been illegally occupied by Ekbote’s organisation.

On December 29 last year, a group of men belonging to Ekbote’s organisation had allegedly desecrated Gaikwad’s tomb. While a case has been registered, and the police filed a charge-sheet following a shoddy investigation, Sushma Ohol – the complainant in the case – says her family is living under constant threat. “I have been pressurised to take the case back. All those men who attached the tomb and hurled casteist abuses at us roam around freely. They try to provoke us. But we have been trying to stay calm. We really hoped the police carries out an investigation in the case, but it never bothered,” Ohol says.

Also read: Bhima Koregaon Has Become a Pretext to Arrest Innocent Workers

Ohol’s brother, Pandurang Gaikwad, has been actively following up with developments at the state, which set up a two-member judicial commission to inquire into the riots. Pandurang says the violence was not so much to hurt his community physically, but “take over their history.” “Vadhu Budruk, over past years, has been slowly undergoing ‘saffronisation’. It is more evident now. You will see more saffron flags on Maratha houses, at Sambhaji Maharaj’s tomb, and even a clear change in the body language of the Hindus of the village.”

Burnt remains of Pooja Sakat’s house that was attacked by an unruly crowd belonging to the Maratha community. A few days after the attack, 19- year-old Sakat committed suicide. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

As villages talk of the changes they have seen in the past year and the efforts undertaken to “normalise the situation,” one can’t miss the charred, tin-shed house of Puja Sakat on the main road leading to the Vijay Stambh. Sakat’s house is a grim reminder of the attack and the loses borne by the Dalit community.

Following the attack, 19-year-old Pooja had allegedly committed suicide. The family has since moved to Pune – to a rehabilitation project set up by the state administration. Nine persons, all belonging to the Brahmin and Maratha communities, have been charged with abetment of suicide.

UAE Court Upholds 10-Year Jail Sentence of Activist Ahmed Mansoor

Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have urged the UAE to release Mansoor, calling his detention a violation of freedom of expression and opinion.

Dubai: A United Arab Emirates (UAE) appeals court upheld a ten-year jail sentence against pro-democracy campaigner Ahmed Mansoor for criticising the government on social media, two sources familiar with the case said on Monday.

A trade and tourism hub, the UAE is an absolute monarchy which tolerates little public criticism. Mansoor, an electrical engineer and poet, was among five activists convicted and later pardoned for insulting the UAE’s rulers in 2011. He was arrested again in March 2017 at his home in Ajman on charges of publishing false information and rumours, and of promoting a sectarian and hate-incited agenda.

Also Read: Academic Freedom: I Spent Months at UAE’s National University – Here’s What I Found

Mansoor was also charged with using social media to “harm national unity and social harmony and damage the country’s reputation.”

In May 2018 he was sentenced to 10 years in prison and handed a fine of 1 million dirhams ($270,000). An appeals court in Abu Dhabi upheld both the jail sentence and fine on Monday, the two sources said on condition of anonymity.

Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (HRW), have urged the UAE to release Mansoor, calling his detention a violation of freedom of expression and opinion.

HRW in March 2018 said Mansoor is believed to have been held in solitary confinement.

(Reuters)

BJP Pushes AgustaWestland as a Counter to Rafale, Congress Doubles Down

The Congress has alleged that the Modi government is using investigative agencies to throw muck at it after middleman Christian Michel claimed in a recent interview that he was being forced by the ED to depose that he had met Sonia Gandhi regarding the deal.

New Delhi: The controversial 2010 AgustaWestland chopper deal has come back to haunt the Congress, as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) interrogates Christian Michel – the alleged middleman in the scam – and the BJP seized an opportunity to attack Rahul Gandhi’s party.

The BJP has made it clear that it aims to use the chopper deal as an answer to the Congress’s allegations against it on the Rafale aircraft purchase.

Immediately after a Delhi court restricted Michel’s legal assistance, the BJP jumped in with all guns firing. The ED had informed the judges that the British national had discreetly slipped in a note to his lawyer; ED officials claimed that the note listed a set of questions that were yet to be posed to Michel on “Mrs. Gandhi”.

Also read: As ED Takes Name of ‘Mrs Gandhi’, BJP, Congress Spar Over AgustaWestland Probe

BJP spokesperson Prakash Javadekar and union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said Congress has been “exposed”, and that Rahul and Sonia Gandhi have a lot to explain.

Background

In 2010, the UPA government agreed to buy 12 AgustaWestland helicopters built by Italian defence manufacturer Finmeccanica (now known as the Leonardo group) for around Rs 3,600 crore. The helicopters were to replace older Mi-8 choppers for VVIP use.

In 2013, however, Italian police arrested AgustaWestland CEO Bruno Spagnolini and Guiseppe Orsi, chairman of Finmeccanica, for allegedly paying bribes to secure the deal.

Subsequently, the CBI alleged that Michel was paid Rs 295 crore to swing the deal in favour of the Italian manufacturer, and that Michel had convinced Indian Air Force (IAF) chief S.P. Tyagi to modify the technical specifications to make AgustaWestland the front-runner. Tyagi was later arrested by the CBI.

The UPA government cancelled the deal and ordered an inquiry. Three helicopters had by then already been delivered to the IAF.

Reviving the old debates

In December 2018, after Michel was extradited from a Dubai prison, BJP has been raking up the issue to target the Congress and the Gandhi family.

The AgustaWestland scam presents a fresh opportunity to revive the issue of Sonia Gandhi’s Italian descent and drive home the Gandhi family’s dominance over Indian politics – an criticism that Narendra Modi used to great effect in his prime ministerial campaign in 2014.

With only a few months left before the 2019 General Election, there is no better time for the BJP to place the Gandhi family back in the firing line; especially as the ruling party has been struggling to mount a convincing answer to growing rural distress and rising unemployment.

Also read: Christian Michel Passing Chits to Lawyers Asking How to Tackle Questions on Sonia Gandhi

At the same time, Rahul Gandhi has emerged as a successful political agenda-setter. His constant focus on cronyism within the Modi government and a national agrarian crisis has had the BJP cornered electorally. Rahul is also credited for rejuvenating a wilted Congress after he took over from his mother as party president earlier this year.

In this context, the BJP will look to encash the AgustaWestland case to deflect attention from its own failures.

The other side of the story

So what is “Mrs. Gandhi’s” role in the controversial deal? For an answer, we have to revisit a 2016 Italian court order, which noted that there was sufficient evidence to prove corruption in the chopper deal.

While the court notes Air Marshal Tyagi and his family may have been bribed by the Italian company, it says nothing concrete about the involvement of Sonia Gandhi or anyone in the UPA government.  

The court’s order mentions Sonia Gandhi, former prime minister Manmohan Singh and senior Congress leader Ahmed Patel, but as The Wire had reported at the time “not with association to them receiving bribes or kick-backs.”

The order refers to Michel’s letter to AgustaWestland’s India sales head, saying that “Sonia is the driving force” and her advisers should be targeted to clinch the deal.

Christian Michel. Credit: Reuters

The letter is indicative of the effect of corporate lobbying with the government, but it does not in any way implicate leaders in a crime.  

However, a handwritten letter from Guiseppe Orsi, the chairman of Finmeccanica, also came up in the court order. In the letter, Orsi asked his staff to use Italian diplomats to ask Manmohan Singh to “scuttle the probe” by not cooperating with the Italian authorities.

The challenge for the Congress is to prove that it did enough to facilitate the probe.

This is what the Congress is currently doing. It is also questioning the Modi government’s decision to allow AgustaWestland do business in India despite the UPA government having blacklisted the company back in February 2013.

Ever since India Today published a story in which Michel claimed that he was being forced by the ED to depose that he met Sonia Gandhi (Muchel also said that he was told he would be let off the hook if he did), Congress has turned the heat up on the BJP.

The grand old party has four principal questions for the BJP.

  1. AgustaWestland and Finmeccanica were blacklisted in India. Modi’s defence ministry removed this ban on 22 August, 2014. The government effectively permitted the company to participate in its “Make In India” programme on 3 March, 2015.
  2. Subsequently, in October 2015, the Foreign Investment Promotion Board allowed AgustaWestland to invest in the country. As a result, it is manufacturing 100 AW119 fighter helicopters for India.
  3. In 2017, AgustaWestland got a new contract to build 100 navy choppers for India.
  4. Why did the Modi government not appeal against AgustaWestland/ Finmeccanica in higher courts of Italy, after it lost a few cases on the issue in lower courts?

Randeep Surjewala, the national spokesperson of the Congress, said, “After the UPA government cancelled the deal with AgustaWestland, we lodged an FIR and ordered a CBI probe. Then defence minister A K Antony also proposed to constituted a joint parliamentary committee but the BJP rejected the offer.”

“As far as the payments to AgustaWestland is concerned, we recovered much more. At the time the deal was cancelled, we had already paid Rs 1620 crore to the company. Three helicopters had come by that time. But we took immediate corrective steps and recovered Rs 2,068 crore,” he said.

He claimed that the UPA government seized Rs 240 crore that belonged to AgustaWestland, which was deposited as security in Indian banks. It also moved the Italian courts to claim damage worth 228 million euros and won the case.

Also read: AgustaWestland Middleman Christian Michel Brought to Dubai for Flight to India

“If we add the price of the three helicopters (Rs 886.50 crore) that are still with us, the UPA government recovered almost double the amount we had spent on the deal,” Surjewala said.

He added that the Milan court that initiated the probe gave a new, 322-page judgement on 17 September, 2018 – and exonerated all Indian officials.

“It found no evidence against any Indian official. The Modi government was a party in this case, which it lost. Again, it did not appeal the higher court,” said Surjewala.  

A tough battle

The BJP’s public statements have skipped over the details of the scam. Instead, they have focussed on Congress’s alleged indulgence of middlemen in defence contracts, and projected the Modi government as the first to initiate an inter-governmental deal – like the Rafale fighter jet purchase.

Meanwhile, the Congress has alleged that the Modi government is using investigative agencies to throw muck at its leaders, though there is no way to corroborate that. It is doubling down on its attack on the Modi government on the Rafale deal, rural distress and unemployment.

Writers on Epics Should Remember the Communal Forces Are Always Looking for an Opening

Hindutva groups want to force one version of the Ramayana down our throats. Our response must be based on scholarship – not provocation.

Thinukidanu phaniraya ramayanada kavigala bharadali.”

Kumara Vyasa – one of the greatest Kannada poets – says that the great snake Adishesha, who carried the entire burden of planet Earth upon his head, was having trouble bearing the weight of the poets who wrote the Ramayana.

Numerous people have written multiple versions of the Ramayana. In his paper published in Many Ramayanas, A.K. Ramanujan places the count at nearly 300. His paper inevitably courted controversy when the Hindutva camp couldn’t tolerate it being listed, even in the suggested readings for a course at Delhi University. In 2008, the ABVP trashed the office of the Dean of History; the essay was ultimately removed from the list.

In Karnataka, a new controversy is brewing over statements made by K.S Bhagwan, a professor of English, about Lord Rama in his new book Ramamandira Eke Beda (Why a Temple for Rama is Not Necessary). In his book, Bhagwan says that Rama and Sita had the habit of drinking liquor together, and used to enjoy dancing with the other women in his palace. Relying on such examples, he concludes that Lord Rama was no God, and hence there is no need to build a temple for him.

The right-wing media pounced on such statements, and in a series of panel discussions, moderators and TV anchors vociferously attacked Bhagwan. Yet this is not the first time K.S. Bhagwan has courted controversy. Many progressive thinkers are also skeptical about the manner in which he has made provocative statements, stoking controversy over not only Lord Rama, but a few other gods and goddesses as well – and reliably making headlines.

Their main objection is that one should study and critique the epics in a scholarly way, not make provocative statements out of context. Conclusions should be premised on research, or they fall prey to those who take every advantage to stoke communal passions.

Also read: The Many Criticisms of Rama and the ‘Anger’ of the Hindu Right

How stories of the Ramayana evolved

I personally concur. I have engaged in a studying a wide variety of Ramayanas over the last five decades, and I detail this in my recent book, Nija Ramayanada Anveshane (A Research Into the True Ramayana), as well as on social media platforms in Karnataka.

The question of how to approach our epics and religious texts is one of the most vexed question of this moment. Communal forces are making unreserved efforts to force a single version of the Ramayana down our throats that is acceptable to them, part of the project of creating a monolithic Hindu Rashtra.

Any response to such attempts must be based on in-depth study and analysis, which should be able to convince the reader through the soundness of facts and arguments.

The Ramayana is widely popular in India, and thousands of villages boast of some mark of Rama or  Sita or Hanuman’s visit in the past. Each of these villages has its own sthala purana. Stories from the Ramayana are also frequently performed as folk-dramas  – yakshagana, bayalata – or heard in the form of harikathas,  etc.

In many festivals, ritual folk songs or bhajans venerating Rama are frequently sung. The Ramayana – Rama, Sita and Hanuman – are etched in the minds of the Indian masses, in spite of them having Siva or other Gods and Goddesses as their prime kuladevatha or mane devru (family god).

Professor K.S. Bhagwan

Every region and language in India has its own version. Poets of many languages have placed the Ramayana in their own context, adapting it to suit their regional culture and times. The Rama Katha has also been  adopted by poets of different religions, like Jainism and Buddhism, to propagate the principles of their religion.

The Ramayana did not remain – as it is widely believed today – a Hindu religious text. Even A.K. Ramanujan was unable to count the folk versions of this epic which existed in thousands of languages across the country.

The fact that these versions were repeated from generation to generation, usually orally, has attached such fantasy to such stories, that it is difficult to determine their historicity. In most folk versions, Sita’s tribulations attract the attention of the poets. In a few folk renditions, she is the daughter of Ravana – not given birth to by his wife, Madodari, but by Ravana himself; birthed out of Ravana’s nose.

Jain poets tell the story differently. They follow Vimala Suri’s Pa uma charia in Prakrit rather than the Sanskrit versions. For them, Lord Rama has attained such a high stage in life that he cannot commit any act of violence – so the act of killing is left to Lakshmana. Hanuman also is no Vanara or ape. He is Ravana’s nephew and a married man, unlike his depiction in Valmiki as a great bachelor.

Also read: Order to Introduce Bhagavad Gita, Ramayana in J&K Schools Withdrawn in 20 Hours

Ravana is not a kamuka – a sex-obsessed man – but a noble person who has taken a vow of parangana virathi (not getting attracted to any woman other than wife). He had evaded many women who desire to have sex with him, but falls victim to a moment of weakness. During the war waged against him by Lord Rama, he tries to win to establish his prowess and then hand over Sita to Rama.

This is the Jaina version that has influenced many a poet like Kuvempu – who was awarded Jnanpith for his Ramayana Darshanam. Even today, this mahakavya  attracts house-full audiences across Karnataka when it is performed dramatically.

In Buddhist Jātaka stories, Sita is sister and also wife of Rama.

Different versions of the Ramayana 

Thus, India has three major groups with distinct versions of the Ramayana. The first group derives from what is presented in Valmiki’s version. The second is an amalgamation of innumerable versions told by folk-poets. The last one is the Jaina versions derived from Prakrit traditions. It is ahistorical to assert that there is a single telling of the Ramayana.

The Ramayana’s percolation down from the ages through its retelling from diverse religious and cultural traditions makes it near impossible to trace the actual source of the epic. What we have today is largely an admixture of versions which have undergone cultural permutations throughout the course of history. In any statement made which is derived from these versions, a thorough process of corroboration between multiple sources requires to be done.

G.N. Nagaraj is a scholar of the Ramayana, and an officer in the Department of Agriculture who resigned to join the progressive cultural movement. His book is Nija Ramayanada Anveshane, published by Bahuroopi.

What I Learnt From Mrinal Sen About Filmmaking, and Being a Good Human

Suhasini Mulay, who played the female lead in ‘Bhuvan Shome’, Mrinal Sen’s first Hindi film, recounts her experience of working with the renowned director.

Mrinal Sen, the renowned film director, passed away on Sunday at 95, a year after his wife Geeta Sen died in 2017. For me, both Mrinal and Geeta are inseparable – I have not seen a couple so much in love for such a long time. The last time I met them, in October 2016, both of them were unwell, lying in adjoining beds. Geetadi more ill than Mrinalda, but still managing the house, managing the show. Mrinalda met me with a smile and said, “Ay Geeta utho, dekho ke eshechhe (Geeta wake up. See who has come)”. Geetadi had her eyes closed and said, “Jaani Suhas eshchhe or awaaj chinte pere chhi (I know it’s Suhas, I can recognise her voice).” I was meeting them after eight years.

Their home in Calcutta – as it was known then – was a haven when I was working there as an assistant director in 1975-76. At that time, Calcutta was not a friendly place for a young woman trying to make it on her own; and Geetadi and Mrinalda’s house was one place I could run for cover and moral support – and also a free meal.

Geetadi was an actor of some caliber. She had made her mark in Utpalda’s plays Angar, Kallol amongst many others. She has also acted in Mrinalda’s Calcutta 71 and Akaler Sandhane. Her work in Khandhar as the bed-ridden woman was superb.

Mrinalda loved to gossip and indulge in the famous Calcutta institution of adda. His rule for gossiping was, “Everybody who is sitting in this room right now is good. No guarantee what will be said once your back is turned.” Mrinalda was a wonderful, warm human being, with strong convictions, strong views and a stronger sense of fun.

I was in the last year of school, preparing to take my Class 11 finals, when my mother phoned to tell me the well-known film director, Mrinal Sen is coming to meet me. ‘Would I please wear a clean frock and look presentable?’ she asked. As my mother seldom made requests like this, I knew it had to be important. It was 1968.

Mrinalda came and described a film he wanted to make on a Bengali story and asked whether I was interested in acting in it. I asked what my mother had said. When he said she was alright with it, I agreed, only wanting to know the role he wanted me to play. Mrinalda looked surprised and said, “Gauri, the main role.” I told him I had never acted in a film before, so he could try me for a day or two and if I did not work out, he should find someone else – I was unfamiliar with what happens behind the scenes, the size of the crew etc.

Mrinal Sen. Credit: YouTube

I later learnt that Uma Krupanidhi (now Uma Da Cunha), who at that time worked for Lintas, had recommended my name. I had done a successful Pears soap campaign and acted in an ad film for them. Mrinalda had seen the photographs and the ad film, and thought that I might fit the bill.

Thus, during the two-month preparatory leave before my exams, I was shooting. I took a train to Bombay. My first memorable memory of Bhuvan Shome is the first flight from Bombay to Bhuj, where I met my co-actors Utpal Dutt and Shekhar Chatterjee.

Till then, it had not occurred to me to ask who my co-actors were. That is when the nerves set in. I had seen and admired Dutt’s and Chatterjee’s plays, Angar, Kallol and Manusher Adhkare. Both were stalwarts in their field. I had even stood outside Dutt’s green room to get an autograph.

I met Mrinalda that night and asked him if he was sure if I could do the job. He told Utpalda what I had said. Utpalda gave his booming laugh and told me to just be myself.

The first day of the shoot was terrible. I kept forgetting my dialogues and Mrinalda kept reassuring: “Very good, excellent. One more take.” When I asked Utpalda what Mrinalda meant by “one more take,” he explained that everybody had to do the same thing again from the beginning. I soon got the hang of it.

The rest of the shoot turned out easy, but I still had trouble learning dialogues. One time there was a particularly long dialogue, and I kept stumbling on one line. Utpalda asked me what the matter was. As I started speaking, he took away my dialogue sheet and asked me to remember what my lines were supposed to convey. I tried to explain what it was, and found myself saying the dialogue verbatim except for the one line I stumbled over, which to me made no sense. “Aha! That is not for you. It’s for me. That line is the cue for my dialogue. That’s why it does not make sense, because you are mugging your lines and won’t read the full scene.” Lesson learnt.

It was Mrinalda and Dutt’s first Hindi film, and the first as a cinematographer for K.K. Mahajan, who had then just passed out of FTII. Mrinalda insisted on speaking Hindi to all of us, but particularly to Mahajan (KK).

A still from Bhuvan Shome

Mrinalda to KK while framing a shot of Utpalda shooting with a 303 rifle. “KK iska ped kaatna.” Translation: “KK frame the shot till the waistline, and cut above the legs”. Translating Mrinalda’s Hindi instructions became a game, as did correcting Utpalda’s grammar and syntax.

Most of the film turned out to be an easy shoot. Largely because I was blissfully unaware/ignorant about the camera, and also because everybody was highly tolerant of me. One scene, however, was particularly challenging – one where I sit on a buffalo and move away into the sunset.

Also read: Mrinal Sen: Always on the Edge

The buffalo, however, refused to move unless bribed. So I sat on the buffalo and asked it to move – but no such luck. Then I sat on the buffalo again and hit it with a stick. No luck once again. Ultimately, since the light was fading, KK warned Mrinalda that we would not get the shot unless the buffalo moved for this last take. So again I sat on the buffalo, hit it with a stick and the owner of the buffalo held a pan with its feed, only then did it move.

Mrinalda was so thrilled with the shot that he decided to take another one, much closer to the buffalo this time. So again I sat on the buffalo, hit it with a stick, the owner pulled the pan with the feed. The camera came on, spooking the buffalo with its noise, which then dived into the bushes and ran away.

I was studying in Canada when Bhuvan Shome released, and when I returned to India, I got a job working as the fourth assistant director to Satyajit Ray in his film Jana Aranya in 1974-75. At that time, Mrinalda was editing his film Mrigayaa. His Hindi-speaking assistant director, Soumendra Batra, was not well and had to go back to Bombay. I worked on the film in the postproduction stage. That is where I again met Mrinalda and Geetadi. By then I had done a course in filmmaking and had a completely different perspective of Mrinalda as a filmmaker. I was re-introduced to him as a person.

It was the Emergency. Calcutta was in a turmoil and many of Mrinalda’s friends were in jail. I met a man deeply disturbed by the political situation around him. Mrinalda was more disturbed by seeing many stalwart people bend down and compromise with the powers that be. He was stunned that so many people bent their knees and so few stood up to be counted. Later when these people made ideological statements, Mrinalda would listen politely, smile and move on. He decided to make what he called “political films”. The problem was that when he consciously made ‘political films,’ they did not work. He was a political animal and his work sang his politics in every film.

Mrigayaa was a veiled film about the Emergency, where people had to revisit their roots in Adivasi India and the bones of their ancestors to find freedom. I learnt a lot from him, then. Learnt a lot about filmmaking and learnt of how to be a good human. Geetadi was always there to bring Mrinalda to ground. His anchor.

I will miss Mrinalda a lot and Geetadi even more. As I said, to me they are inseparable. Hope they found each other again.

Suhasini Mulay is an actor and a documentary filmmaker. 

Why Education Should Not Be a Barrier for Contesting Elections

If you erect entry barriers to contesting, you are effectively curtailing the right to vote, by pre-emptively selecting the pool of people from whom the voters can decide.

After YouTuber Dhruv Rathee took to Twitter to slam the Rajasthan government’s decision to scrap the minimum education criteria for civic poll candidates, Delhi-based lawyer Gautam Bhatia wrote a thread to break down why the move is actually in the spirit of democracy. 

A thread on why this view is not correct:

There is no evidence to demonstrate that people with a formal education can do a better job as elected representatives than those without. In fact, anecdotal evidence at the time the law was passed suggested the contrary.

See, for instance, Radha Devi. There were many such examples – especially – of women panchayat leaders who drew upon their own experiences of deprivation and lack of opportunity, to ensure that that did not continue.

That, alone, is a good enough reason for why this law was wrong. Formal education has no necessary connection with the qualities required for good and competent political and administrative leadership.

But actually, this framing is itself suspect.

It is suspect because we live in a democracy, and at the heart of our democracy is the concept of representation: voters decide who will best represent their interests, and elect them to legislative bodies accordingly.

Also read: New Rajasthan Cabinet Scraps Education Criteria for Civic Poll Candidates

Therefore, when you say that formally uneducated should be barred from contesting elections, what you are effectively saying is that you don’t trust the voters to decide who will best represent their interests. This is arrogant and presumptuous.

Now you may argue that there is a distinction between the right to vote and the right to stand for election, and that nobody is taking away the right to vote. But they are two sides of the same coin. If you erect entry barriers to contesting, you are effectively curtailing the right to vote, by pre-emptively selecting the pool of people from whom the voters can decide. It is, effectively, a restriction on voting, just that it’s done indirectly.

Third reason: such laws are discriminatory. They discriminate on lines of gender and caste, because those who have been deprived of access/opportunities to education, are inevitably the most vulnerable members of society. This is documented.

So, the Haryana law disenfranchised 68% of Dalit women and 50% of all women from contesting. It’s not these peoples’ fault that they were unable to get a formal education. Deprivation is function of social discrimination, not individual character flaws.

For these three reasons – that it has no tangible effect on the quality of decision-making, that it is counter to the fundamental logic of democracy, and that it is discriminatory – this law was bad.

Now, to some objections.

Objection A: Will you also get rid of age-based restrictions?

Answer: No, because the logic of an age restriction is entirely different. We agree that participation in democratic politics requires a degree of *mental maturity* that is a function of age.

And, more importantly, everybody reaches that age. I address this in a more detailed fashion here.

Objection B: What about convicted criminals?

Answer: Again, the logic is different. Somebody who has broken the law and *is undergoing his sentence* is in the process of paying back a debt to society. It is a legitimate argument to say that the integrity of the electoral process requires them to be kept out while they serve their sentence. After they have finished serving their sentence, and have technically rejoined society on equal terms, I see no reason why they should continue to be kept out.

Objection C: How will they perform tasks that require a formal education, such as, for e.g., signing documents?

Answer: The Panchayati Raj Acts have detailed provisions for providing legislative and technical assistance to people who are elected.

Final point: remember, there is a long history of denying, curtailing and interfering with the democratic process because the people in power believe that other people are incapable of using the vote in a “fitting manner”. This was the logic of the British regime that imposed property qualifications on the vote, tried to impose a “wifehood” qualification, and all kinds of restrictions. For a magisterial treatment of this phenomenon, see Alexander Keyssar’s book, The History of the Right to Vote.

Also read: From Restoring Right to Contest, to Education, Rajasthan Congress Reverses BJP Decisions

When our constitution was being framed, some of the members of the Assembly wanted to restrict the franchise, because they feared giving it to a vast number of “illiterate Indians”. Fortunately, they were overruled, and a great leap of faith was taken.

This leap of faith was to transform India into a full-blooded democracy, and not a hollow shell of a democracy. This means that, at the end of the day, to respect the autonomy and decision-making capacity of the voter.

I think that covers all aspects. For those interested, each of these arguments are developed in a much more detailed fashion on the Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy Blog, from back in 2015.

This article is a compilation of tweets published by Gautam Bhatia, a Delhi-based lawyer. They have been reproduced here with permission.

The ‘Unholy Alliance’ Against Modi, and the Election He Wants Us to Forget

Long before a ‘mahagathbandhan’ began to form up to challenge the ruling party in 2019, the BJP itself came to power through a grand alliance of desperate measures.

A prediction for 2019 – we will be hearing a lot about an “unholy alliance”. There have been a few of them already, but the big one is still coming.

The phrase was warmed up over the past year, by BJP leaders and government-friendly officials accusing the opposition of cynical politics. Across the country, bitter rivals have been burying their differences, as they gravitate toward one grand alliance – a mahagathbandhan – against the ruling party in the election next year.

In March, an ‘unholy alliance’ formed in Uttar Pradesh. In May, in Karnataka. In November, Andhra Pradesh – and then in Jammu and Kashmir.

Finally, last week, Prime Minister Narendra Modi described it to party workers in Tamil Nadu:

Do you know, several of these parties and their leaders claim to be deeply inspired by Dr Ram Manohar Lohia, who was deeply opposed to the Congress… What sort of a tribute are they paying to Dr Lohia by forming an unholy and opportunist alliance with the Congress?  

It is true that these alliances are very pragmatic arrangements – requiring serious compromises, both personal and ideological.

It is also true that it is a strategy of last resort, as cabinet minister Nitin Gadkari gloatingly said at a media summit in December: “Durbal logon ke unity ka naam hai mahagathbandhan (the unity of the weak is called a mahagathbandhan).”

Yet, if BJP leaders today call the strategy of opposition unity ‘unholy’, it’s because they are hoping we don’t remember how their own party first came to power – and how India elected its first ever, non-Congress national government in the summer of 1977.

How to end an Emergency

By January of 1977, prime minister Indira Gandhi had held the country in a State of Emergency for nineteen months. It was a surprise to nearly everybody when on January 18 she announced that it was over, and India would be able to elect its new government – in less than two months.

The timing was thought to favour her party’s prospects at the polls – and especially her own, and those of her son, Sanjay. Almost every observer believed that Indira would win a renewed, if reduced, majority.

For the preceding nineteen months, the Congress had controlled the news media. In his book A People Betrayed, L.K. Advani would later describe the situation in words that could have been written about 2018: “The entire network of mass media… was harnessed for the purpose of brainwashing people into believing that liberty, civil rights and democracy were elitist concepts.”

Indira thus remained a towering presence in the country’s imagination, and she believed that the country needed her – more perhaps than she believed in democracy. Her cousin, the writer Nayantara Sahgal, said about her: “She firmly believed in her own indispensability.”

Also read: Ten Reasons Modi is Just Like Indira Gandhi. And That’s Not a Good Thing.

A race against time

Meanwhile, most opposition leaders, from the Left and the Right, had been sitting in jail for at least a year: out of public sight, unable to campaign or to raise funds. Now they were free, but they had barely six weeks to organise against the Congress Party, which had never yet lost a national election.

Yet something interesting had happened – the common experience of being in jail, sometimes in the same jail block, had built bonds between very different leaders with very different ideologies. The leading light of the anti-Indira movement, Jayaprakash Narayan, or ‘JP’, also declared that he would not take part in the campaign unless the opposition unified itself.

On January 23, just five days after Indira’s announcement, the leaders of four parties from across the political spectrum banded together:

  • the Socialists, led by George Fernandes and Raj Narain, from the left;
  • the Congress (O), a conservative break-away faction, led by Morarji Desai;
  • the Bharatiya Lok Dal, further on the right, led by Charan Singh, an icon for many middle-caste peasant groups in Uttar Pradesh;
  • the Jana Sangh, led by L.K. Advani and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, which would later become the BJP.

They didn’t just form an alliance but merged into a new party – the Janata Party.

It was just the beginning. A week later, the country’s most prominent Dalit leader, Jagjivan Ram, led a faction out of Indira’s Congress – he called it the Congress For Democracy – and it quickly allied with the Janata Party as well.

In his column at that time, journalist S. Nihal Singh wrote that, ‘Mr Jagjivan Ram’s departure… and the Janata Party’s single-minded resolve to give the Congress a good fight despite handicaps, have sent ideology on a holiday’.

George Fernandes had to contest the election of 1977 from jail. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

From the outset, there was deep mistrust between the former rivals, and hard bargaining for power within the alliance. Morarji Desai was appointed the chairman, and Charan Singh settled for vice-chairman, but only in return for the final say on allocating tickets across most of north India. That compromise, Advani later wrote, was a bitter one for Jana Sangh members, who complained to Vajpayee, ‘Aap ne gardan kaat kar unke haath me de di.

How to unite the Left and Right

Two other major parties – the Akali Dal, and the communists of the CPI(M) – were not going to officially join an alliance that was heavily influenced by the RSS. But the CPI(M) had suffered the worst of the Emergency, and they too entered practical arrangements to avoid splitting the anti-Congress vote.

The alliance did not attempt to select its candidate for prime minister. Charan Singh badly wanted it, as did Jagjivan Ram. But JP, the moral voice of the movement, personally favoured the 81-year-old Morarji Desai.

By the end of six weeks, the “Unholy Alliance” of 1977 included Marxists as well as members of the RSS. It pulled together Brahminical parties, middle-caste leaders and Dalits. Nayantara Sahgal, Indira’s dissident cousin, wrote about JP that “though he had been long regarded as an impractical idealist… it was his supremely practical accomplishment to unite the Opposition and guide it to victory.”

As he did.

The Janata Party won the election of 1977 by a landslide. For the Congress, it was rout – plunging from 350 seats to 153. Both Indira and Sanjay Gandhi lost their seats. The Congress did not win a single race in UP, Bihar, Delhi, Punjab or Haryana.

It was only after this astonishing coup that Janata Alliance turned to choosing a prime minister, in a process mostly managed by JP and JB Kripalani. The result was that Morarji Desai became India’s first non-Congress prime minister.

And the tables have turned

Forty years later, it is the BJP that has a suffocating grip on power, backed by huge corporate donors and a pliant media. Once again, opposition parties have realised that their only chance is to pull off what seems like a political miracle – a successful grand alliance.

Is today’s mahagathbandhan also an Unholy Alliance? Not as much as in 1977. In that year, the opposite ends of the spectrum had to come together against a Congress dominating in the centre. Today, an alliance is banding together against a ruling party that is moving out, on its own, to the far right of the spectrum.

The election of 1977 has lessons for the opposition today. The first is simple: A dominant party that is determined to hang onto power can be unseated by consolidating opposition votes, instead of splitting them.

Also watch: Is India Moving to the Right, Regardless of Who Won?

However, the Janata Party had JP to hold their allies together. Today’s opposition has no one similar. The question of whether Rahul Gandhi deserves to lead the Congress party cannot wait for the results of the 2019 election to be decided. It will be decided before the voting, based on his success holding together a band of parties – many of which, as Modi pointed out, regarded the Congress as their main nemesis a decade ago.

A more resonant lesson is that the idea of TINA – that ‘There is No Alternative’ – is a myth. Rather, there is a necessary alternative. No leader is indispensable. Sitting in jail in Bangalore in 1976, Advani warned, “The concept of a person’s indispensability and democracy go ill together.”

And exactly a year later, as Nayantara Sahgal concluded: “The myth of indispensability was quietly disposed of at the polls… a vindication of Nehru’s own passionate conviction that his countrymen must live, and grow, in freedom.”

Modi Congratulates Bangladesh’s Sheikh Hasina on ‘Decisive’ Poll Victory

Hasina’s Awami League has won 259 seats in the 300-seat parliament.

New Delhi: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated his Bangladesh counterpart Sheikh Hasina for her “decisive” victory in the parliamentary elections, with New Delhi terming the polls as a reaffirmation of the “vision of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman”.

According to the latest results, the ruling party, Hasina’s Awami League has won 259 seats – 80% – in the 300-seat parliament. This is more than the 234 seats the Awami League obtained in the 2014 elections, which was boycotted by the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).

Over 66% of voters turned out for the elections on Sunday, which was marked by a string of violent incidents which left around 18 dead.

The Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement here that Modi called Hasina on Monday morning to convey “his heartiest congratulations on the decisive results of the election”.

Modi expressed confidence that relations between India and Bangladesh would continue to flourish under Hasina’s “far-sighted leadership”, the press note stated.

“PM also reiterated the priority India attaches to Bangladesh as a neighbour, a close partner for regional development, security and cooperation, and a central pillar in India’s “Neighbourhood First” policy,” it added.

Welcoming the “successful completion” of the poll, India also congratulated Bangladeshis for “reaffirming their faith in democracy, development and the vision of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman”.

Also read: Interview | When It Comes to Human Rights, Awami League and BNP are no Different

Acknowledging that Modi was the first foreign leader to convey congratulations, Hasina appreciated his reiteration of India’s commitment to support Bangladesh’s development, as per the MEA press release.

“The conversation was very cordial, fully reflecting the close and traditionally friendly relations between India and Bangladesh,” said the communique.

India’s Election Commission had sent a three-member observer delegation to the polls. According to the Bangla Tribune, the head of the Indian delegation, West Bengal chief electoral officer Ariz Aftab gave a clean-chit on the fairness of the elections.

There was a similar green light from the international observer missions from SAARC and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.

While international observers were satisfied with the arrangements, local media reported on the widespread absence of polling agents from opposition parties at the polling centres.

The Daily Star reported that “Polling agents of neither the BNP nor its allies were seen in 196 polling centres visited by our correspondents in Dhaka city and 250 centres in 25 districts.”

Another newspaper, Dhaka Tribune claimed that several polling centres had individuals who were ‘posing’ as polling agents of the BNP-led Oikya Front.

The opposition alliance rejected the results of the 11th parliamentary elections and called for fresh polls.

Meghalaya Mine Accident: Navy, NDRF Divers Fail to Reach Bottom of Pit

The joint operation was launched after the naval team leader, Lieutenant Commander Santosh Khetwal, went down the vertical shaft of the mine till the surface of the water, where he assessed the situation before sending in the divers, the officials said.

Lumthari: The multi-agency operation launched on Sunday to rescue the 15 miners trapped in a 370-foot-deep coal mine here did not yield much results as the divers from the Indian Navy and National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) could not reach the bottom of the pit, officials said. The joint operation was launched after the naval team leader, Lieutenant Commander Santosh Khetwal, went down the vertical shaft of the mine till the surface of the water, where he assessed the situation before sending in the divers, the officials said.

“Six divers from the Indian Navy and the NDRF went down the shaft of the mine and reached a depth of about 80 feet from the surface of the water. They spent over two hours searching for traces of the miners in the shaft,” East Jaintia Hills district Superintendent of Police (SP) Sylvester Nongtynger mentioned.

Also Read: Trapped Meghalaya Miners Are the Latest Victims of Years of Labour Exploitation

According to Navy officials, the depth of water from the surface till the bottom of the pit was expected to be over 150 feet, he said. Assistant Commandant of the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), Santosh Kumar, who is heading two teams of his force in the search-and-rescue operation, said they managed to place an inflated boat in the flooded water which could serve the purpose of a platform for the divers to keep their equipment. He added that the divers would go down the shaft of the mine again on Monday in a bid to reach the bottom of the pit.

The SP said the divers could not detect anything on Sunday and on Monday, they would be using hi-tech equipment, including a remotely operated vehicle, to search for the miners. He added that the horizontal holes, where the miners were stuck, were suspected to be at the bottom of the shaft. The officer said pumps were expected to be pressed into service on Monday, in an attempt to lower the water level at the mine shaft. At least 10 high-powered pumps from the Odisha Fire service, along with 21 personnel, had reached the accident site and a submersible pump from the Coal India Limited (CIL) was expected to arrive anytime Sunday night, he added.

The CIL had promised to send at least six pumps from their various bases across the country, the SP said. Asked about the pumps promised by the Pune-based Kirloskar Brothers Limited, he said he was yet to get any information about those even as a team from the company had visited the site earlier.

(PTI)

Snowfall in Darjeeling, Gangtok After 10 Years, Army Rescues Tourists From Nathu-La

Those who drove up to Nathu-la to enjoy the snow were stranded as the roads till Changu Lake got covered with layers of snow, making it inaccessible to vehicles.

New Delhi: After a decade-long break, the West Bengal’s Darjeeling town Sikkim’s capital Gangtok received snowfall.

Local media reported that following a round of hailstorm on the afternoon of December 28, the Darjeeling town, Singamari, Ghoom, Jorbungalow and Sukhapokhari areas recorded about 15 minutes of snowfall. Snowing, which began around 4.30 pm, was a first after February 14, 2008. Reports quoting eyewitnesses said the town, however, didn’t turn white as a bout of rain followed the snowfall soon after.

Darjeeling town is situated about 6,400 feet above sea level. Kalimpong town, situated about 8,000 feet above sea level, is another West Bengal town that recorded snowfall on December 28.

Snowfall was also recorded in neighbouring Sikkim, particularly in Gangtok and Ravangla. While the capital city received snowfall after a gap of a decade, Ravangla, according to state government sources, snowed after 15 years.

Tourists rescued by Indian army personnel. Credit: Twitter/Kuldeep Dhatwalia

The news about snowfall in Darjeeling and Gangtok led to a rush of tourists from the plains nearby to the snowbound areas. Many tourists who drove up to Nathu-la, which also received heavy snowfall on December 28, however, got stranded as the roads till Changu Lake got covered with layers of snow, making it inaccessible to the vehicles. News reports put the number of stranded tourists at “nearly 2800” and vehicles at “300 to 400”.

The army and the civil administration came to their rescue, providing shelter and food in the night. East Sikkim district collector Kapil Meena was quoted in news reports, stating, “Half of these people will return to Gangtok with the help from police, army and civil administration while the rest will be taken to army bases in and around Nathula.”

On December 29 and 30, social media sites abounded with photos of grateful tourists leaving behind thank you notes for the army.