AI Does Not Have the Answers to India’s ‘Aspirational’ and Frustrated Economy

2025 has dawned with existential problems humanity must solve in a hurry. Climate change. Inequity. Injustice. Wars amongst countries. Wars within them.

Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be everywhere in 2025. Are we in an AI wonderland now? Will AI be a magic solution to make the world better for everyone? Many, enchanted with it, think so. Others are skeptical of its magic. The time has come for humanity to reflect before it is too late, on where the world is headed and whether we want to go where AI is taking us. We must ask some fundamental questions about who we are, whether artificial intelligence is real intelligence, and what we aspire for.

“India has become an aspirational society” is a popular description of the outcome of India’s ‘liberal economic’ reforms in 1991, under pressure, it must be remembered, of the liberal markets’ ideology of the Washington Consensus.

A report in the Times of India on January 3, 2025 says:

Rich live in different times, luxe watches fly off shelves.”

“Sales of smart watches may be struggling, but luxury watches are seeing record demand, not just in the metro markets but also in tier-2 and tier-3 cities.

Most luxury watch brands, whose prices start from a few lakhs of rupees and top the crore mark, have seen sales in India grow substantially in 2024..”

“The growth reflects a broader trend of aspirational consumption in India, with more people keen to experience luxury brands”, says the CEO of a chain of luxury watch boutiques.”

Are policymakers hallucinating when they imagine India has become an aspirational society? Are all Indians keen to experience luxury? And, if all want it, can they afford it? Who has become aspirational? What are they aspiring for? Are their aspirations being fulfilled?

Artificial intelligence is not the solution. Since powerful and autonomous AI agents will not need instructions from human beings, let us imagine what problems they will be inclined to use their power to solve.

A fear is that AI will reduce the need for human work, and reduce the numbers of jobs and reduce incomes. Tech enthusiasts and economists say, don’t worry. There will be new jobs in the green economy; also, jobs to provide for increasing needs for care as populations age. They have hopes that since humans have not found good solutions for complex problems of economic inequity, climate change, and societal dystrophy, artificial intelligence is our saviour. But let’s pause and think before we outsource our future to AI.

Some questions economic reformers must find answers to are:

  • How will the economy grow if citizens earn less and have less incomes to pay for services?
  • Who will pay the businesses who provide the new AI-powered solutions?

More technology and more AI alone cannot provide answers to these questions. There are ethical questions too about the purpose of business institutions and the uses of technology.

Will AI agents care about climate change? Biological life on Earth is sustained by simple molecules: H2O (water) to nourish; O2 (oxygen) to breathe. AI agents are biologically disembodied beings. They do not need water and oxygen to live. Why would they care if the Earth is running out of water and the atmosphere is becoming choked with carbon?

Needs for caregiving are growing in rich and poor countries, with ageing populations, distress caused by war and disease, and mental health problems caused by an increasing societal dystrophy. Economists and technologists say these needs are an opportunity to increase the size of the caregiving economy.

In addition to the problem of who will pay for the solutions provided to citizens, there are other questions: Can AI agents with no human feelings care about the feelings of human beings? What will be the quality of the relationship between AI caregivers and human beings they assist?

2024 was a low point in global governance. Institutions for global cooperation have broken down. COPs for arresting climate change are ineffectual. The WTO is on its deathbed. The UN is in limbo. Forecasters predict that the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which were to be achieved by 2030, will not be attainable even by 2087 if we carry on solving problems the way we are.

Perhaps the only hope for humanity, some hallucinate, is that AI will take over global governance before too late and solve problems we are unwilling to cooperate and solve. But consider, who is developing these intelligent agents, and who controls them: Alphabet/Google, Meta/Facebook, Microsoft/Open AI, Apple in the US; Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, Ping An in China. Large, privately owned, tech empires.

Yanis Varoufakis calls them ‘cloudalist conglomerates’ in his book, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, his insightful analysis of the global political economy. Look behind the screen, who controls these conglomerates that have made us data-serfs, providing them the data they need, voluntarily and for free, to train their intelligent agents that control our minds?

Boundary between private and public

Systems for collective governance of economic, social, and political systems are being torn by political power conflicts to establish the inviolable boundary between the private and the public; between ‘socialism’ and ‘capitalism’; between what belongs to an individual and what must belong to the public; between what is permissible to be used for selfish, personal gain and what must be used for the general, public good.

Two levels of technology controllers are manipulating humans in the 21stcentury, making us into willing puppets. At one level are autonomous agents who now take decisions for us in various domains of our lives – shopping, education, health, finance, etc. Controlling them are investors and owners of the tech platforms and AI applications they deploy that are pervading our lives. These feudal, technology empires compete for more profit and more power, and become more powerful. Common citizens are becoming powerless.

India’s, and the world’s, 21st century existential problems need political consensus, not technological fixes. Let’s listen with empathy to other humans in 2025. Let our minds not be manipulated by AI algorithms.

Arun Maira is a former member of the Planning Commission and former chairman of BCG India. He is the author of Transforming Systems: Why the World Needs a New, Ethical Tool-kit and Listening for Well-Being: Conversations with People Not Like Us.

This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.

Western Ghats Among World’s 4 Regions Where Freshwater Species Are at Highest Risk of Extinction

The study recommends targeted action to prevent further extinctions and calls for governments and industry to use this data in water management and policy measures.

New Delhi: The Western Ghats mountain range, one of India’s four biodiversity hotspots, is among the four regions in the world where freshwater species are most threatened with extinction, as per a recent study published in the journal Nature on January 8.

The study, which is the largest global assessment of freshwater animals on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN’s) Red List of Threatened Species so far, shows that 24% of the world’s freshwater fish, dragonfly, damselfly, crab, crayfish and shrimp species are at high risk of extinction. Established in 1964, the IUCN Red List assesses the global conservation status of animal, fungus and plant species and lists them into nine categories based on their assessment levels and how threatened by extinction they are, based on criteria such as population declines, restricted ranges and more. These are “Extinct,” “Extinct in the Wild,” “Critically Endangered,” “Endangered,” “Vulnerable,” (the latter three list species threatened with global extinction in decreasing order of threats) “Near Threatened,” (which comprises species that will be threatened without ongoing conservation measures), “Least Concern,” (species that have a lower risk of extinction) “Data Deficient” (species whose conservation status cannot be assessed because of insufficient data) and “Not Evaluated.”

Key findings: Regions and species most threatened

The recent study found that at least 4,294 species out of 23,496 freshwater animals on the IUCN Red List are at high risk of extinction. Crabs, crayfishes and shrimps are at the highest risk of extinction of the groups studied, with 30% of all these species being threatened, followed by 26% of freshwater fishes and 16% of dragonflies and damselflies. And the greatest number of threatened species dwell in Lake Victoria (distributed across the African countries of Tanzania and Uganda, and on the border of Kenya), Lake Titicaca (in the Andes mountain range bordering Peru and Bolivia), Sri Lanka’s Wet Zone (in the central and southwestern region of the island nation) and the Western Ghats of India. The threatened species in the Western Ghats include the Saffron reedtail (Indosticta deccanensis), a dragonfly that is found only in some localities in the mountain range and is considered “Vulnerable” by the Red List, and the Dwarf Malabar Puffer (Carinotetraodon travancoricus), a species of freshwater puffer fish found in some streams of the Ghats and is “Data Deficient.” However, species like the Kani maranjandu, a spider-like tree crab discovered from the southern Western Ghats in Kerala in 2017, are not even currently assessed in the Red List – there is no data on its conservation status at all.

The reasons for freshwater species being the most threatened in these regions including the Western Ghats are not ones we are unfamiliar with – pollution, mainly from agriculture and forestry, impacts over half of all threatened freshwater animals, according to the study. Add to this land conversion for agricultural use, water extraction and the construction of dams, which also block fish migration routes. Other reasons also include overfishing and the introduction of invasive alien species.

Case study: The hump-backed mahseer

The study also found that although the threatened freshwater animals studied tend to live in the same areas as threatened amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles, they face different threats due to their specific habitats. Conservation action must therefore be targeted to these species, the study recommends. Take the case of the “Critically Endangered” hump-backed mahseer (Tor remadevii) that is found only in the river system of the Cauvery and its tributaries in south India, for instance. The fish, once thought to be widespread across the entire river (as per historical records dating back to the late 19th century), is now found in just five fragmented river and tributary stretches of the Cauvery, which is a shocking decline of around 90% in its distribution range, according to the IUCN Red List assessment.

“Although they live side by side in the Western Ghats, conservation action for tigers and elephants will not help the ‘Critically Endangered’ hump-backed mahseer, which is threatened by habitat loss due to river engineering projects and sand and boulder mining, poaching and invasive alien species. Active protection of the river and tributaries where the hump-backed mahseer lives is essential to its survival, in addition to fishing regulations and banning the introduction of further invasive alien species,” noted Rajeev Raghavan, South Asia chair of the IUCN Species Survival Commission Freshwater Fish Specialist Group and one of the co-authors of the study, in a press release.

The study also found that water stress and eutrophication are poor “surrogates,” or indicators, to be used in conservation planning for threatened freshwater species; areas with high water stress, where there is high demand and low supply, and areas with more eutrophication, where an excess of nutrients in the water leads to overgrowth of algae and plants, are home to fewer numbers of threatened species than areas with lower water stress and less eutrophication.

The study recommends targeted action to prevent further extinctions and calls for governments and industry to use this data in water management and policy measures. “Lack of data on the status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity can no longer be used as an excuse for inaction,” the study read.

The hump-backed mahseer, for example, badly needs a systematic conservation plan, Raghavan told The Wire. Despite being a “Critically Endangered” species (tigers across the world, in comparison, are only “Endangered” as per the IUCN Red List) and one of India’s mega fish as well as a transboundary species (found in tributaries of the Cauvery in Kerala, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu), there have been no efforts to develop a conservation plan for the species yet, Raghavan said.

“Protection of critical habitats is the most important strategy. There is also need for some more research, as very little information is available on the ecology, movement and early life history of the species,” he added. “This could be a nice example of a flagship species that can bring all three states together (especially as a positive side to the Cauvery water dispute)… securing the future of this species requires an effort from all three states.”

Global implications and call to action

“Freshwater landscapes are home to 10% of all known species on Earth and key for billions of people’s safe drinking water, livelihoods, flood control and climate change mitigation, and must be protected for nature and people alike,” stated Catherine Sayer, IUCN’s freshwater biodiversity lead and lead author of the paper, in a press release. “The IUCN World Conservation Congress this October will guide conservation for the next four years, as the world works to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets by 2030. This information will enable policy makers and actors on the ground to plan freshwater conservation measures where they are most needed,” she added.

“This report really drives home just how under threat freshwater species are globally as a result of human activities,” noted co-author Matthew Gollock, Zoological Society of London’s programme lead for aquatic species and policy and chair of the IUCN Anguillid Eel Specialist Group, in a press release. “The good news is, it’s not too late for us to tackle threats such as habitat loss, pollution and invasive species, to ensure our rivers and lakes are in good condition for the species that call them home.”

Note: This article, first published at 9.32 am on January 13, 2025, was republished at 8.20 am on January 14, 2025.

Chandrima Shaha: The Indian Scientist Who Shatters Stereotypes

The book ‘Chandrima Shaha: A Lifelong Journey of Scientific Inquiry’ presents some less-known aspects of Chandrima’s life. It reveals that her entry into professional cricket was linked to her passion for photography.

Sometimes scientists dabble with music and art, and many excel. Homi Jehangir Bhabha was a painter and a great connoisseur of art, while Satyendra Nath Bose played the esraj (a violin-like instrument) and Raja Ramanna was a pianist. K. Radhakrishnan, former chief of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), is a trained Kathakali dancer and vocalist. 

But can you think of an Indian scientist who has played professional cricket, been a radio commentator, a science writer, and a photographer, along with making pathbreaking scientific discoveries and becoming the head of one of the highest academic bodies in the country? That’s Chandrima Shaha for you. Her diverse personality and career has few parallels in the contemporary Indian scientific community, and this is what a new biography of hers captures beautifully.

A cover photo o Chandrani Shaha's biography.

Chandrima Shaha: A Lifelong Journey of Scientific Inquiry, Rajinder Singh and Suprakash C. Roy, Shaker Verlag, Düren, Germany, 2024.

Written by Rajinder Singh – a leading historian of science based in Oldenburg, Germany – along with Calcutta-based physicist Suprakash C Roy – the biography is titled Chandrima Shaha: A Lifelong Journey of Scientific Inquiry. Singh has made a mark with his biographies of Indian scientists – not just the likes of C.V. Raman and D.M. Bose but those of lesser-known figures of Indian science.

In recent years, he has brought to the public gaze many unsung scientists such as Bibha Chowdhury, Snehamoy Datta, Bal Mukund Anand and Purnima Sinha. Several scientists whose lives Singh has documented happen to be women, correcting the unsaid bias in conventional history telling. Chandrima’s biography is in the same series. 

In 2020, Chandrima was elected as the president of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA), the first woman to lead the academy which is celebrating 90 years of its founding this month. She is currently the J.C. Bose Chair distinguished professor (Infectious Diseases and Immunology) at CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata.

Chandrima was born in Calcutta (now Kolkata) to accomplished parents – her father Shambhu Shaha was a creative photographer and her mother Karuna was a painter and singer. Shambhu Shaha is known for the perceptive pictures he shot of Rabindranath Tagore at Santiniketan during Tagore’s twilight years.

Tagore appreciated his work as he captured important cultural happenings at Santiniketan. The book contains a picture of young Chandrima with Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru when he inaugurated an exhibition of Tagore’s pictures shot by Shambhu Shaha. In 2001, Chandrima wrote a book on her father. 

The atmosphere at the Shaha household was eclectic and creative, with frequent visits from artists, art lovers and contemporary intellectuals of the city including eminent scientific figure, Satyendra Nath Bose. The book contains a picture of Chandrima and her mother with famous painter M.F. Hussain. Chandrima shot a candid portrait of Hussain with her camera and it was later published in the Illustrated Weekly of India in 1973.

Chandrima’s interest in science was kindled in her childhood when her father gifted her a small telescope and encouraged her to look at stars and planets. Soon, she thought of becoming an astronomer. The aspiration changed when her father brought a monocular microscope from an auction house.

“A drop from a puddle formed by rainwater, examined under the microscope, opened an amazing world not visible to the naked eye. Moving creatures of various shapes and sizes visible under the microscope intrigued Chandrima. This was very different from the static view of the sky,” the book points out.

The young Chandrima would often wander into neighbours’ gardens to collect insects. Such visits opened her eyes to the beautiful phenomenon of metamorphosis – the transformation of a caterpillar to a butterfly and so on. Such exploration of the natural phenomena led her to dream of becoming a biologist – possibly the kind who wanders through jungles gathering insects to learn more about their existence. To further encourage her interest, her father gifted her the book on the origin of life by Charles Darwin on her fifteenth birthday.

A young Chandrima Shaha at an exhibition of her father Shambhu Shaha’s photographs of Rabindra Nath Tagore (1961) in Delhi with Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who inaugurated the show. Anil Chanda, former secretary of Tagore and then deputy home minister is standing with Nehru. Photo: Special Arrangement

As a student of Zoology at Calcutta University where she did her graduation and post-graduation, Chandrima would often go on field trips to coastal Bengal to collect and study specimens. This allowed her to pursue her interest in photography as well as study marine animals in their habitat.

Then Chandrima joined the PhD programme at the Indian Institute of Experimental Medicine (later renamed CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology) which is known for its work on plant-based products. She worked in the laboratory of Anita Pakrashi who was engaged in research in reproductive sciences, experimenting with compounds from the plant Aristolochia indica Linn for their medicinal properties as described in folk medicine.

For postdoctoral work, Chandrima joined the laboratory of Gilbert S. Greenwald, a reproductive biologist at the University of Kansas Medical Center, as a Ford Foundation Fellow in 1980. Here, she worked on various aspects of ovarian cellular functions. She joined the biomedical laboratory of the Population Council in the spring of 1982 and started working on peptides that regulate the ovary and the testis. 

While at the Population Council, she happened to meet G.P. Talwar who was building the laboratories of the National Institute of Immunology (NII) and was recruiting scientists under a scheme to bring back Indian scientists from the United States. Chandrima was invited to join NII to build an independent laboratory addressing pressing problems in the country. After a long spell of 28 years at the laboratory, she was appointed director of NII in 2012. 

Also read: Reproductive Futures: The Promises and Pitfalls of In-Vitro Gametogenesis

At NII, her work focused on hunting for possible candidates for a sperm vaccine, building upon her work on testicular physiology and germ cells. For designing a sperm vaccine, the idea was to find a protein in human sperm that is essential for sperm function and would be able to block the interaction with the egg when necessary.

The work established the role of glutathione S-transferase (GST) in testicular cells. GST M1 found in germ cells could bind to sex steroids and is secreted by the seminiferous tubules, making it an important protein for the functioning of the testis. Her research provided important leads for the development of an anti-fertility vaccine.

Chandrima Shaha

Chandrima Shaha. Photo: Karthiguy, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Her laboratory also addressed problems associated with cell survival and death in unicellular and multicellular organisms and made significant contributions to Leishmania biology. The Leishmania parasite is the causative agent for leishmaniasis or Kala-Azar. The original contribution of the laboratory was the demonstration of apoptosis-like death in the parasite, much like metazoan apoptosis.

This opened an opportunity for intervention of parasite survival through the manipulation of apoptotic proteins. Studies relating to the mechanisms by which the parasite deals with anti-leishmanial drugs showed how parasites respond to drugs, become resistant or die.

While providing details of her scientific work and its impact, the book also presents some less-known aspects of Chandrima’s life. For instance, it reveals that her entry into professional cricket was linked to her passion for photography. She accidentally saw an advertisement of the newly formed Women’s Cricket Association, while visiting a publisher’s office, and decided to rush to the stadium to take pictures of the cricket team. There, she found that the selection process for the team was in progress and decided to enrol herself and to her surprise, she got selected.

Chandrima represented West Bengal in the National Women’s Cricket Championships in 1973 and 1974 and was included in the East Zone team as the vice-captain. Her first major assignment as a radio commentator for first-class cricket was the match between East Zone and the visiting Sri Lanka team in November 1975. 

The authors have presented a well-researched account of the life of an eminent scientific personality of contemporary times. It is an important addition to the literature on women in STEM and the modern history of science in India.

Dinesh C Sharma is a journalist and author based in New Delhi. His latest book is Beyond Biryani – The Making of a Globalised Hyderabad.

2024 Hottest Recorded Year, Crossed Global Warming Limit: World Meteorological Organization

The last two years saw average global temperatures exceed a critical warming limit for the first time, Europe’s climate monitor said Friday, as the UN demanded ‘trail-blazing’ climate action.

The last two years saw average global temperatures exceed a critical warming limit for the first time, Europe’s climate monitor said Friday, as the UN demanded “trail-blazing” climate action.

While this does not mean the internationally-agreed 1.5°C warming threshold has been permanently breached, the United Nations warned it was in “grave danger”.

“Today’s assessment from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is clear,” UN chief Antonio Guterres said. “Global heating is a cold, hard fact.”

He added: “Blazing temperatures in 2024 require trail-blazing climate action in 2025. There’s still time to avoid the worst of climate catastrophe. But leaders must act – now.”

The WMO said six international datasets all confirmed that 2024 was the hottest year on record, extending a decade-long “extraordinary streak of record-breaking temperatures”.

The United States became the latest country to report its heat record had been shattered, capping a year marked by devastating tornadoes and hurricanes.

The announcement came just days before President-elect Donald Trump, who has pledged to double down on fossil fuel production, was set to take office.

Excess heat is supercharging extreme weather, and 2024 saw countries from Spain to Kenya, the United States and Nepal suffer disasters that cost more than $300 billion by some estimates.

Los Angeles is currently battling deadly wildfires that have destroyed thousands of buildings and forced tens of thousands to flee their homes.

‘Stark warning’

Another record-breaking year is not anticipated in 2025, as a UN deadline looms for nations to commit to curbing greenhouse gas emissions.

“My prediction is it will be the third-warmest year,” said NASA’s top climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, citing the US determination that the year has begun with a weak La Nina, a global weather pattern that is expected to bring slight cooling.

The WMO’s analysis of the six datasets showed global average surface temperatures were 1.55°C above pre-industrial levels.

“This means that we have likely just experienced the first calendar year with a global mean temperature of more than 1.5°C above the 1850-1900 average,” it said.

Europe’s climate monitor Copernicus, which provided one of the datasets, found that both of the past two years had exceeded the warming limit set out in the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Global temperatures had soared “beyond what modern humans have ever experienced”, it said.

Scientists stressed that the 1.5°C threshold in the Paris Agreement refers to a sustained rise over decades, offering a glimmer of hope.

Still, Johan Rockstrom of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research called the milestone a “stark warning sign.”

“We have now experienced the first taste of a 1.5°C world, which has cost people and the global economy unprecedented suffering and economic costs,” he told AFP.

On the edge

Nearly 200 nations agreed in Paris in 2015 that meeting 1.5C offered the best chance of preventing the most catastrophic repercussions of climate change.

But the world remains far off track.

While Copernicus records date back to 1940, other climate data from ice cores and tree rings suggest Earth is now likely the warmest it has been in tens of thousands of years.

Scientists say every fraction of a degree above 1.5°C matters – and that beyond a certain point the climate could shift in unpredictable ways.

Human-driven climate change is already making droughts, storms, floods and heat waves more frequent and intense.

The death of 1,300 pilgrims in Saudi Arabia during extreme heat, a barrage of powerful tropical storms in Asia and North America, and historic flooding in Europe and Africa marked grim milestones in 2024.

‘Stark warning’

The oceans, which absorb 90% of excess heat from greenhouse gases, warmed to record levels in 2024, straining coral reefs and marine life and stirring violent weather.

Warmer seas drive higher evaporation and atmospheric moisture, leading to heavier rainfall and energising cyclones.

Water vapour in the atmosphere hit fresh highs in 2024, combining with elevated temperatures to trigger floods, heatwaves and “misery for millions of people”, Copernicus climate deputy director Samantha Burgess said.

Scientists attribute some of the record heat to the onset of a warming El Nino in 2023.

But El Nino ended in early 2024, leaving them puzzled by persistently high global temperatures.

“The future is in our hands – swift and decisive action can still alter the trajectory of our future climate,” said Copernicus climate director Carlo Buontempo.

Sudha Murthy, Abhay Bang and Krishna Ella Among INSA’s 2025 India Fellowship Awardees

N.R. Narayana Murthy, Nandan Nilekani and Dr Neerja Bhatla are also among the 61 individuals who have been bestowed with the India Fellowship of INSA for 2025.

New Delhi: Rajya Sabha MP Sudha Murthy, health researcher and activist Abhay Bang and scientist and entrepreneur Krishna Ella are among 61 individuals who have been awarded the esteemed India Fellowship of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA) for 2025.

The India Fellowship is a prestigious honour bestowed by the INSA to distinguished individuals who have made notable contributions to new knowledge and discoveries.

Sudha Murthy, the former chairperson of Infosys Foundation, is known for her philanthropy and her contribution to Kannada and English literature. She is the first female engineer hired at TATA Engineering and Locomotive Company. Over the years, Murthy has written several books which include novels, non-fiction, travelogues, technical books, and memoirs and they have been translated into all major Indian languages.

“Bang’s journey is deeply rooted in the ethos of Mahatma Gandhi’s Sevagram ashram, where he found inspiration. In 1985, he established SEARCH (Society for Education, Action and Research in Community Health) in Maharashtra’s underdeveloped Gadchiroli district. Operating across 150 villages, SEARCH delivers community-based healthcare and conducts ground-breaking research, influencing health policies globally,” INSA mentioned in its website.

Ella, co-founder and executive chairman of Bharat Biotech International Limited (BBIL), has been recognised for his contributions to the field of science, including the development of new vaccine technologies and significant improvements to existing ones.

Ella, who specialises in molecular biology, founded BBIL in 1996. He holds a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and was a gold medallist at the university. Prior to his entrepreneurial endeavours, he worked as a research faculty member at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. He has been conferred with the Padma Bhushan. Ella is a part of several committees, including the scientific advisory committee to the Union cabinet.

Infosys founder N.R. Narayana Murthy, co-founder and chairman of Infosys Nandan Nilekani, Biocon India executive chairperson Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, Indian Institute of Science professor Ambarish Ghosh and All India Institute of Medical Sciences’s head of Obstetrics & Gynaecology department Dr Neerja Bhatla have also been bestowed with the India Fellowship of INSA for 2025.

How to Make Electric Car Batteries Without Overwhelming Reliance on China

Building indigenous capacities to produce raw materials for lithium-ion batteries will be crucial for achieving energy transition goals.

The global transition to green technologies has increased the demand for lithium dramatically.

This critical mineral, abundant but distributed unevenly, is essential for energy storage and transport electrification.

According to the International Energy Agency, by 2040, the demand for lithium could be up to 42 times its 2020 levels.

Lithium-ion batteries are used to power electric vehicles and store renewable energy such as wind and solar.

In 2023, the demand for batteries crossed 750 GWh, up 40 percent from 2022

Owing to their high energy density, long cycle life and efficient discharge capacities, these batteries have become crucial in the field of energy storage and electric mobility.

By 2040, over two-thirds of passenger vehicles will be electric. Lithium-ion batteries are also crucial for grid storage systems, ensuring grid reliability by balancing energy inputs and outputs.

Their efficiency and lightweight nature also make them vital for portable electronics.

They are also used in smartphones – in 2022 alone, around 1.39 billion smartphones, mostly powered by lithium-ion batteries, were sold globally.

However, a demand-supply mismatch, particularly in the components used to manufacture these batteries, poses several challenges for these exponentially growing markets.

Major markets for electric vehicles – and thus, lithium-ion batteries – include the US, Europe and China.

India is one of the largest importers of lithium-ion batteries and its lithium-ion battery market size is estimated to be at $US4.71 billion in 2024. By 2029, it is expected to reach $US 13.11 billion.

The problem lies in an overwhelming reliance on China for refining and producing lithium and lithium-ion batteries, which poses a significant challenge for the sustainability goals of several countries.

Challenges in the lithium supply chain 

The production of lithium-ion batteries relies on a complex global supply chain.

This begins with mining companies extracting the mineral, and refining them on site to produce battery-grade raw materials. Raw materials typically contain lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel and graphite.

Manufacturers buy these raw materials and use them to produce cathode and anode active battery materials.

These active materials are then bought by traders and sold to firms that produce battery cells.

Battery manufacturers assemble the battery cells into modules and then pack and sell them to buyers such as automakers, who place the finished batteries in electric vehicles.

The problem starts with the availability of the prime raw material – lithium – its processing and refining, and finally, the production of active materials.

Nearly 80 percent of the known deposits of lithium are in four countries – the South American lithium triangle of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, and Australia.

The market, however, is dominated by China – a country with meagre reserves.

Despite holding less than 7 percent of reserves, China is the world’s largest importer, refiner and consumer of lithium.

Sixty percent of the world’s lithium products and 75 percent of all lithium-ion batteries are produced in China. This is primarily fuelling China’s electric vehicle market, which is 60 percent of the world’s total. 

Though the US, Europe and India have begun producing lithium ion battery packs, the production of the most critical components of the lithium-ion battery value chain – cathode and anode active materials – remains concentrated in China.

Depending on the chemistry of the lithium-ion cells, cathode active material would comprise 35-55 percent of the cell, and anode active material would  be 14- 20 percent.

Countries aiming to ramp up lithium-ion battery supply would need to focus on the production of these components.

Today, China represents nearly 90 percent of global cathode active material manufacturing capacity, and over 97 percent of anode active material manufacturing capacity.

The remaining gaps in manufacturing capacity are being filled up by Korea and Japan.

Efforts are underway to zero in on a more sustainable, cost-effective and energy-dense chemistry of the lithium-ion cell.

For instance, there’s the NMC battery cell, where the cathode active material is made from a combination of nickel, manganese, and cobalt. Nickel increases the energy density, and manganese and cobalt are used to improve thermal stability and safety.

Then there’s the NCA cell, or the Nickel Cobalt Aluminium Oxide Cell, where the manganese is replaced with aluminium to increase stability.

One of the more coveted cell chemistry technologies is Lithium Cobalt Oxide. With its high specific energy and long runtimes, it is considered ideal for smartphones, tablets, laptops and cameras.

The star of cell chemistries, however, is LFP — Lithium Iron Phosphate battery.

With their thermal stability, LFP batteries are safer and have a longer cycle life, suitable particularly for off-grid solar systems and electric vehicles. They also perform well in high-temperature conditions and are environment friendly due to the absence of cobalt.

Today, LFP has graduated from a minor share in battery manufacture  to the rising star of the battery industry.

LFP battery cells are powering over 40 percent of electric vehicle demand globally in 2023. This is more than double its share recorded in 2020.

Efforts to increase the manganese content of both NMC and LFP are also underway. This is being done to boost energy density while keeping costs low for LFP batteries, and reduce cost while maintaining high energy density for NMC cells.

Ramping up domestic production

An alternative to making energy storage cost-effective and decreasing reliance on critical minerals such as lithium is sodium-ion batteries. 

Though these batteries still require some critical minerals such as nickel and manganese, they do reduce reliance on lithium.

Sodium-ion batteries, just like LFP, were also initially developed in the US and Europe.

But China has taken the lead here too –  its manufacturing capacity is estimated to be about ten times higher than the rest of the world combined.

Pricing of raw materials is a big factor in sodium-ion batteries replacing lithium ones; currently, prices are low and discouraging investments and delaying expansion plans. 

Then there are supply chain bottlenecks such as for high-quality cathode and anode materials required to manufacture sodium-ion batteries.

Until these issues are resolved, countries will have to build indigenous capacities to ramp up their lithium-ion battery production.

A few companies in India have started their manufacturing projects with support from the government, and many others are planning to do so.

The success of these, and others across the world, however, will depend on the localisation of lithium-ion value chain components such as the cathode and anode active materials, separator and electrolytes.

Separators work by separating the anode and cathode active materials to  prevent a short circuit; they also contribute to the overall working of the cell including its thermal stability and safety.

A few Indian companies are now gearing up to produce lithium-ion cathode and anode active materials as well as separators for the domestic as well as global lithium-ion battery supply chain.

They have also developed the technology for production of active raw materials for sodium-ion and aluminium-based batteries.

Such innovations will be crucial for the energy transition goals of countries such as India which are currently heavily dependent on importing raw materials for batteries.

Abhimanyu Singh Rana is an associate professor and the Director of Research & Development at BML Munjal University, where he  heads research on advanced materials and devices for clean energy and sustainability. BML Munjal University is working with Haryana-based Dawson group of companies for testing of raw materials for Lithium-ion batteries.

Amlan Ajay, director, Dawson Group, contributed significant technical content for this article.

Originally published under Creative Commons by 360info™.

Rajagopala Chidambaram Was the Last Flag Bearer of Homi J. Bhabha’s Vision and Legacy

The nation has lost a highly capable and versatile scientist who had country’s development foremost in his mind.

Rajagopala Chidambaram, the former director of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), the former chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission and the former principal scientific advisor (PSA) to the government of India, passed away in the morning of January 4, 2025.

He was 88, and had served in the above capacities during the years 1990-93, 1993-2000 and 2001-2018 respectively.

Given the key roles that he played in India’s nuclear explosion tests ‘Smiling Buddha’ on May 18, 1974 (Pokhran-I) and the ‘Shakti’ series of five explosions, which included a thermonuclear device (hydrogen bomb) test, on May 11 and 13, 1998 (Pokhran-II), he has been widely described as one of the key architects of the Indian nuclear weapons programme. No doubt, he was definitely that, but a lot more. It is probably fitting to describe him as the last of the flag bearers of the legacy and holistic vision of Homi Jehangir Bhabha, the founder of the Indian nuclear programme.

Anil Kakodkar. Photo: Public domain/Wikipedia.

Some time in 1995, this writer had gone to meet him at the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) guest house in Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi. As Chidambaram walked into the meeting room, in tow was a certain well-built younger person. He introduced him to me as ‘Dr. Anil Kakodkar, a brilliant nuclear engineer’, and added “You will see and hear more of him in the years to come”. And that has indeed been borne out to be very true.

Brahm Prakash. Photo: IISc official website.

Clearly he had acquired the same knack from Bhabha of identifying the right people just as the latter had first picked the great metallurgist Brahm Prakash to be his right hand man and later Chidambaram, a materials scientist at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), to work with Brahm Prakash to address the various metallurgical issues involved in the early growing phase of the country’s nuclear programme.

Indeed, Brahm Prakash’s mentorship stood Chidambaram in good stead when he was faced with the metallurgical problems for carrying out India’s first nuclear test, the Peaceful Nuclear Explosion (PNE) at Pokhran in 1974. 

This acute ability of Chidambaram was also in evidence when the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) was faced with a quandary in the selection of a new director after Virendra Singh completed his two-term tenure as the director in 1997. Chidambaram, as the Chairman of the three-man selection committee, wanted someone who knew Bhabha, understood his way of administering the institution and had the capability to strive to keep Bhabha’s legacy alive.

But, to maintain the tradition, there was no one meeting Chidambaram’s requirements under the age of 55 who could serve as director for two terms. The senior most at the TIFR then was Sudhanshu S. Jha, a condensed matter theorist, whom Bhabha had spotted as a highly promising theorist and had sent him to Stanford University to work with Felix Bloch in 1960 when he was barely 20. But in 1997 Jha was already 57. Chidambaram, after taking the faculty, researchers and students into confidence, decided to break tradition and appoint Jha, who then served for one five-year term as the TIFR director.

The PNE of May 18, 1974, was a watershed moment in the Indian nuclear programme and Chidambaram had a very important role in its execution. Sometime around 1967, when Chidambaram was 31, his senior colleague at the BARC, Raja Ramanna, tasked him with the derivation of the ‘equation of state (EOS)’ of plutonium, a physico-metallurgical problem that is critical to the design of a nuclear explosive device. But information about EOS of weapons materials was closely guarded by the nuclear weapon states (NWSs) of the time. The EOS is a thermodynamic equation relating state variables of materials under a given set of physical conditions, such as pressure, volume, temperature, or internal energy. In a nuclear device fissile material such as plutonium is brought under very high pressure for the fissile core to attain a critical density and sustain a chain reaction releasing enormous amounts of energy.

Though in his recent biographical book India Rising: Memoir of a Scientist he says, “I was surprised when he asked me to take up this work because this was a completely different field from what I was working on”, the reasons for the choice are abundantly clear. He was already a known expert in materials science, given his outstanding work in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for his doctoral thesis followed by work in crystallography and condensed matter physics, and with the knowledge in metallurgy gained from his association with Brahm Prakash in the nuclear establishment, he was the best person who could have a go at the problem. His success in deriving the EOS ab initio formed the basis of the design of India’s first nuclear device in 1971, the one that was finally used in the Pokhran-I PNE.

APSARA reactor and plutonium reprocessing facility at BARC as photographed by a US satellite on February 19, 1966. Photo: GODL India/Public Domain/Wikipedia.

Following the Pokhran-I nuclear test, Chidambaram got interested in the field of high-pressure physics and initiated broad ‘open research’ in the field, with its obvious strategic implications as well. A whole range of instrumentation to carry out research in the field was developed and built indigenously under his guidance. He also laid the foundation of theoretical high-pressure research for calculation of EOS and phase stability of materials from first principles and the high-pressure physics group attained international recognition as well. The paper on ‘Omega Phase in Materials’ by Chidambaram and colleagues is now regarded as textbook material in materials science.

The characteristics of the 1974 test, which used a 12-kt plutonium device emplaced in a shale medium at a depth of 107 m in a chamber at the end of a L-shaped hole, “helped understanding of the explosion phenomenology, fracturing effects in rocks, ground motion, containment of radioactivity etc.”, Chidambaram wrote. He and his colleagues had written a one-dimensional computer code for the numerical simulation of the mechanical effects of underground nuclear explosions in rock called OCENER and had developed a computer simulation model based on that.

“An important aspect of this computer simulation is to delineate the fracture system in the rock medium and to select a depth of emplacement to prevent connection of the ground surface with the cavity containing the hot radioactive gases. In the PNE test of 1974 and the five tests carried out in May 1998, such simulation calculations ensured that there is no residual radioactivity on the surface at the test sites,” Chidambaram (and Surinder Sharma) wrote later in the journal Bulletin of Materials Sciences of the Indian Academy of Sciences.    

Though, technically, it had all the design features of a PNE, and indeed Chidambaram had presented implications of the 1974 nuclear test (Pokhean-I) for peaceful applications of nuclear explosions at the International Atomic Energy (IAEA) in 1975, it had been planned as a technology demonstrator and the first step in the development of a strategic nuclear weapons programme.

Given that the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) was an ‘inherently unfair treaty’, Chidambaram did not believe in keeping the nuclear option open. Criticising the arbitrary cut-off date of January 1, 1967, set in the treaty for  a country to be designated as a Nuclear Weapon State (NWS), he wrote “This is equivalent to saying ‘you may have a post-graduate degree but if you got it after January 1, 1967, you will be still be presumed to be uneducated’.” Like his senior colleague Raja Ramanna, he was clear on the strategic importance of the country having a demonstrated nuclear weapons capability as long as others had it. 

Chidambaram as the AEC chairman and A.P.J. Abdul Kalam as the scientific adviser to the defence minister and the head of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) were the project coordinators for the Shakti series of tests in May 1998 (Pokhran-II). Unlike the Pokhran-I test, these were openly proclaimed as successful nuclear weapon tests and projected as part of an overt Indian nuclear weapons programme. Following Pokhran-II India declared itself to be a Nuclear Weapon State (NWS).

Chidambaram had then also stated that the data from the Pokhran-II tests were sufficient for building a stockpile of nuclear weapons and no further tests were necessary. He reiterated this in August 1999 when he said that India now had the capability to manufacture a nuclear device “of any size”. An unfortunate and immediate fall-out of his involvement in the Pokhran-II tests was that, even though he was the vice-president of the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr), Chidambaram was denied a visa to attend the executive committee meeting of the IUCr in July 1998. 

Former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visiting Pokhran after the 1998 nuclear tests. Photo: File photo

Despite the good deal of scientific details that were put out following Pokhran-II tests, there were doubts being expressed about the yields of the tests, the thermonuclear test in particular, not only by Western observers but by no less a person than his predecessor AEC chairman, P. K. Iyengar. Iyengar’s remarks of 2000 and those of Western commentators were picked up as late as 2009 by others like Ashok Parthasarathi and K. Santhanam to dispute the claims made by Chidambaram and Kakodkar and said that India would need to conduct further tests for establishing a credible minimum nuclear deterrence. Perhaps due to political pressure, it was left to Chidambaram to come out defending the tests on September 24, 2009, through a public point-by-point rebuttal of the doubts being expressed.

Notwithstanding his key contributions to the strategic aspects of the Indian nuclear programme, he was more concerned about India’s energy security, especially in the wake of global warming and climate change, and the important role of nuclear power in improving India’s per capita electricity consumption and sustainable development. He criticised the IAEA at its General Conference in 2000 for its increasing proliferation misconceptions and its undue emphasis on nuclear safeguards (and the consequent increasing expenditures towards that) rather than putting its efforts in promoting nuclear power in underdeveloped and developing countries though well planned international technical collaboration and cooperation programmes. 

In his address at the IAEA GC of 2000 he said:

“I would like to emphasise that the IAEA was created with the main objective of accelerating and enlarging the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world. This is the central pillar on which the Agency should rest while giving due consideration to safeguards measures to prevent the use of Agency assistance for military proposes, and establish safety standards for protection of health and minimisation of danger to life and property. Safety and safeguards are indeed important and necessary supporting activities to enlarging and accelerating the contribution of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. However, they cannot become activities of the IAEA overshadowing the peaceful uses of atomic energy. Primacy must be accorded to technology. This is the only way we can faithfully interpret the time-tested Statute of the Agency…Our delegation…would like to reiterate that IAEA with its comprehensive in-house expertise, as well as its access to globally available expertise, would do well to pool all resources to facilitate the role of nuclear energy in sustainable development. This is the need of the hour…” 

During his time at the helm of the Indian nuclear establishment between 1993 and 2000, the Indian nuclear power programme too achieved several milestones. In June 1994, India won its first commercial heavy water export deal, with the DAE supplying 100 MT of heavy water to South Korea. Another consignment of 100 MT was exported to South Korea later in 1998 as well. The same year, after France stopped supllying low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel for the Tarapur plant, the DAE succeeded in negotiating an agreement with China for its supply under IAEA safeguards, the first consignment of which was received in January 1995. Later in 2000, Russia replaced China in the supply of LEU for Tarapur.

The year 1995 also saw the new Narwapahar uranium mine in Jharkhand begin its operations. In March 1996, the second reprocessing plant at Kalpakkam was cold commissioned. Later in the year, India’s first U-233 fuelled research reactor Kamini of 30 kW capacity attained criticality, thus proving DAE’s capability in handling the artificial U-233 isotope, derived by burning thorium in nuclear reactors, as a fissile material for the third stage of the Indian nuclear programme. In 1997 India refused to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) which, India argued, being discriminatory, hampered the growth of India’s nuclear programme.

Chidambaram’s contributions in the multifarious aspects of the Indian nuclear programme are truly noteworthy. But, at the end of it all, he was basically a scientist deeply interested in material sciences, particularly the subject of quasicrystals (crystals with ordered, but aperiodic, structure). His hallmark achievement in the field was the first ever positron annihilation studies that he carried out with colleagues in 1989 to investigate the gaps and defects in a quasicrystalline aluminum-manganese alloy. Indeed, after the period of his intense involvement in the country’s strategic programmes during the mid- to the late-1990s, he returned to doing research in the area which he continued with younger colleagues till 2004. 

He was equally concerned with the Indian higher education system and the Indian research and development. A little known fact is that Chidambaram (and separately Kalam), heading different committees during the Vajpayee regime, were the earliest to moot the idea of setting up IIT-like institutions dedicated to basic sciences. Their recommendations were later taken up by the then Science Advisory Council to the PM (SAC-PM) headed by C.N.R. Rao, whose presentation of the concept to prime minister Manmohan Singh during the UPA-1 regime resulted in the setting up of a chain of institutions called the Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISERs). 

As the PSA to the government of India – in which position Chidambaram served for a long tenure of 17 years working with three different prime ministers – he launched initiatives such as Rural Technology Action Group (RuTAG), which empowered rural communities through innovative technologies, Society for Electronic Transactions and Security (SETS), to contribute towards advancing India’s cybersecurity and hardware security infrastructure, and National Knowledge Network (NKN) to connect educational and research institutions across the country.

Around 2005, concerned with the inappropriate publications-centric quantitative measure of basic research activity in the country that was being used by analysts to compare India with other countries, particularly China, Chidambaram as the PSA initiated projects for evolving other metrics for progress of S&T in the country which would also include quantitative measures of activities in patenting, mission- and industry-oriented research, agricultural and rural development, country-specific innovations, research and high-technology development. 

In Chidambaram the nation has lost a highly capable and versatile scientist who had country’s development foremost in his mind. He kept science and politics (including that within the S&T apparatus of the country) apart and was thus acceptable to politicians of different hues. It is because of this non-controversial nature of his that he could easily serve under different prime ministers and succeeded in doing his bit for the development of the country. 

R. Ramachandran is a science writer.

Note: The article was edited to correct the name of the treaty that India refused to sign in 1997. It was the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and not the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty.

2024: A Year in Scientific Researches and Discoveries

This record-setting year for heat saw stunning auroras, a map of a brain, a Dengue epidemic, the first look at rocks from the far side of the Moon, an AI energy scramble and more.

As nearly half of the world’s population headed to the polls this year, politics grabbed many of the headlines. But scientists and the natural world also managed to attract the public’s attention. Here, Knowable Magazine takes a look at some of the most notable research-related events and discoveries of 2024, as well as a few studies and policy moves that we are eager to watch play out in the coming year.

Sky show

Celestial events encouraged many people to look skyward this year, with the Sun taking centre stage.

In April, millions of people stopped to watch the “Great North American Eclipse.” Total solar eclipses happen every year or two, but this one provided the longest period of totality visible from land in over a decade, casting its shadow on a path smack over North America. The show was mostly of interest as a public spectacle, but citizen science projects also helped to collect data that should, for example, help to refine models of solar activity.

Sky gazers were also stunned by auroras this year, thanks to a natural peak in solar activity caused by the 11-year cycle of the flipping of the Sun’s magnetic poles. While this solar maximum doesn’t look particularly strong in terms of the number of sunspots, “there were many more big flares than we would expect compared to the last cycle,” says solar physicist Lyndsay Fletcher of the University of Glasgow. “It’s quite exciting.” Big flares in May created the biggest solar storm to reach the Earth in just over two decades, and more big flares brought bright lights to the skies in October.

The last dramatic year for auroras was two cycles ago, in 2003. Back then, we didn’t have pervasive cell phone cameras that could easily capture aurora colors, or social media sites like Facebook to spread the news. The show will continue: Forecasts show the solar maximum lasting into early 2025.

Alongside these solar fireworks, heliophysicists have some fresh data to look forward to: This Christmas Eve, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe mission will get closer to the Sun than ever before, zooming by at 3.8 million miles from the surface. Such studies help astronomers to better understand the solar activity that leads to both auroras and space weather that can foul up electrical equipment.

Total map of a brain

In October, scientists published the first complete map of a complex (though tiny) brain: that of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, one of the most-studied animals in biological research. The new “connectome” charts the wiring between 140,000 neurons, giving new insights into the roles of different brain regions.

The human brain presents a far bigger challenge, with more than 80 billion neurons. But scientists have made a start. In May, researchers at Google revealed a 3D image of a tiny piece of human brain the size of half a grain of rice, containing about 16,000 neurons. That adds to a high-resolution atlas of brain architecture created by the European Union’s Human Brain Project, which concluded last year.

Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are helping to tackle these data-heavy tasks. Along with seeking to better understand fundamentals of how the brain works, such projects aim to solve mysteries of human mental illnesses or chart better paths to recovery after brain injury — and, along the way, might also help to improve AI.

Hot Earth

It will come as no surprise that 2024 once again broke heat records, with the global average temperature topping 1.5 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average for the first time. High summer temperatures brought the planet’s fourth and most widespread global coral bleaching event, affecting around 75 percent of global corals.

A warmer planet comes with extreme weather: Unusual heat in the Gulf of Mexico fed supercharged hurricanes, and Valencia, Spain, received more than a year’s worth of rain in eight hours in October, causing deadly flooding. “The urgency is very tangible,” says Andrew Satchwell, an energy economist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who works on climate policy.

Also read: COP29 in Crisis: Populism, Geopolitics and the Fragility of Climate Diplomacy

Global carbon dioxide emissions looked like they were starting to level off in 2023, but 2024 saw emissions bump upward again. The world is not on track to hit Paris Agreement targets that aim to limit warming. Instead, current policies and actions look set to see a world that’s perhaps 2.7 degrees C warmer by 2100. Still, a few policy moves are starting to see traction. In the United States, for example, substantial pots of cash from the Inflation Reduction Act to decarbonise the country’s energy started to flow in 2024. “I think we have seen a turn,” says Satchwell.

Efforts to track emissions of methane — an even more powerful though shorter-lived greenhouse gas — have revealed some nasty surprises. The largest inventory of methane emissions from US oil and gas production, for example, found them to be around three times the government estimate. A 2024 report highlighted a worrying bump up in large methane leaks detected, including a record-breaking blowout in Kazakhstan that lasted more than 6 months.

Dealing with dementia

This year, several researcher groups took big steps toward a simple and cheap blood test for Alzheimer’s disease, which accounts for around two-thirds of the world’s 55 million cases of dementia; the UK’s Blood Biomarker Challenge hopes to add a routine blood test for dementia to the British public health care system within five years.

More extensive diagnosis is key to tackling Alzheimer’s, says Joshua Grill, director of the Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders at the University of California, Irvine. “We have to catch people early.”

The disease has no cure, but early-stage patients may benefit from new drugs that aim to slow its progression: Monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid protein, which builds up in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, have made waves after a 20-year gap with no new drugs for the disease. “These positive trials were a big deal and very welcome,” says Grill. Donanemab was approved in the United States this year, following lecanemab’s approval in 2023.

Such drugs might even prove effective at preventing the disease in high-risk people who haven’t yet shown memory symptoms; trials are underway and the results should be out in four years, says Grill. Meanwhile, a 2024 Lancet report by a panel of dementia experts listed more than a dozen simple actions that research has shown can help to prevent or delay dementia, from using hearing aids to keeping cholesterol in check and exercising.

Work on conditions that plague our later years is welcome as the global population ages dramatically. Between 2015 and 2050, the percentage of people over 60 years old is expected to nearly double, to 22 percent.

Plastic pollution panic

Plastics hit the spotlight this year as delegates to the United Nations tried to thrash out an international treaty to end plastic pollution. Although they failed to come to an agreement by December as originally planned, their work will continue next year

There are now an estimated eight gigatons of accumulated plastic on Earth — twice as much as the weight of all animal life. Plastic has leached into every corner of our lives, including our oceans, air, food, blood and mothers’ milk. To support the treaty process, researchers modeled various plastic control policiesand cataloged more than 16,000 plastic chemicals. More than 4,200 of these were found to be of concern because they were “persistent, bioaccumulative, mobile and/or toxic.”

“I would far rather we take the time needed to agree upon a strong treaty rather than settle for something of little substance,” says Richard Thompson, a marine biologist at the University of Plymouth in England who studies plastics and is coleader of the Scientists’ Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty. “Personally, I remain hopeful; there are answers to this problem.” The key, he says, is to dramatically reduce overall production, and make the remaining essential plastics “better by design” — with more recycled content, for example, and fewer toxic additives.

Researchers also continue to seek out better ways to recycle or dispose of plastics (including finding fungi or bacteria to do the job), or to create more biodegradable versions.

A vehicle sorts through trash, much of it plastic. Photo: Rawpixel. CC0 public domain dedication.

AI gets supercharged

Artificial intelligence programs improved dramatically this year. The large language models that power chatbots like ChatGPT have now surpassed people in many areas; some can achieve medal-worthy performance in the Math Olympiad and beat science PhDs in “Google-proof” tests of their own fields. The wave of developments caught the eye of the Nobel committee, with 2024 prizes in both physics and chemistry going to AI-related discoveries.

As the technology advances, the electricity and water demand for the computing that powers AI has ballooned worryingly. “We’re starting to see industrial-scale challenges for power supply,” says data scientist Jakub Kraus from the Center for AI Policy in Washington, DC, who notes that big tech companies are now turning to nuclear power to fill their voracious energy needs.

Despite their cleverness, chatbots continue to make serious mistakes, hallucinate false facts and perpetuate bias. Misuse can cause serious problems. AI-generated deepfakes made waves in this year’s elections, for example when Joe Biden’s voice was cloned to send out fake telemarketing calls urging Democrats not to vote in the primaries.

The European Union’s AI Act, which went into force in August, will begin to regulate AI providers and ensure good practices, such as transparency about how the systems work. “This is a good step forward,” says Kraus. “Overall, there has not been a major AI policy package in the US. That might change.”

Votes cast for change

2024 was a year of both communal action and global divides. Around the world, a record-setting number of voters headed to the polls: More than 75 nations, holding roughly half of the world’s population, held national elections. The prevailing trend was for change: An ABC News analysis showed that in over 80 percent of democracies, the incumbent party lost seats or voter share.

In this banner “super year” for elections, the entire concept of democracy is facing challenges. Voter turnout is going down, riots have become more common, election results are often disputed in courts and there are deep and troubling social divides, including in the United States.

American democracy is in crisis,” writes legal scholar Bertrall Ross of the University of Virginia in the 2024 Annual Review of Law and Social Science. “Both sides perceive every election as an existential threat to their ways of life.”

A river runs through it

The Paris Summer Olympics threw a spotlight on water pollution when athletes complained bitterly about the poor condition of the Seine, which was meant to be clean for the games. Paris is not alone. Rivers the world over increasingly face troubles from pollution, decreased water supply and more. An August series of reports from the UN Environment Program found worrying changes to the distribution, quantity and quality of river water globally: River flow, for example, has decreased in 402 basins worldwide.

That may be a small fraction of the total 12,572 basins, but it’s a fivefold increase over the number of dwindling rivers documented 15 years ago. And pollution makes things worse. A 2024 research paper concluded that out of 10,000 global river basins, around 1,000 face problems because of water scarcity, and that number more than doubles, to 2,500, when taking into account nitrogen pollution, mainly from agricultural runoff.

Also read: Grief, Hope, and the Future of Coral Reefs

Disease dangers spreading

The mosquito-spread dengue virus raised alarms this year as cases hit record numbers. The Americas have been hardest hit, with more than 12 million cases — double the number from 2023 and three to four times the average over the past five years.

In October, the World Health Organization launched a plan to tackle the disease globally. Dengue is rarely fatal, says Scott Weaver, director of the Institute for Human Infections and Immunity at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. But the meteoric rise in cases has infectious disease specialists scratching their heads. “I’m worried that we don’t understand what’s going on,” Weaver says. Climate change might be part of the answer. Other mosquito-borne diseases like West Nile virus are on the rise in more temperate climes like Europe as the world warms.

Meanwhile, mpox is also a pressing concern. The disease — previously known as monkey pox — was considered a disease largely spread to humans from other animals and endemic to central and west Africa. Then in 2022, cases spread by close person-to-person contact began popping up globally. In August 2024, an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was declared a public health emergency of international concern as a more virulent and deadly form of the virus — called clade 1 — started to spread, with the first known case appearing in the US in November. “This is pretty concerning,” says Weaver.

Five years after the outbreak of Covid-19, better plans for coping with pandemics remain elusive: Delegates to the World Health Organization disappointingly failed to come to an agreement for a treaty on pandemic responses this year. “I’m not very optimistic that international cooperation is going to improve a lot,” says Weaver.

Moon matters

Several craft are sent to the Moon every year, but 2024 brought a few special successes: Texas-based Intuitive Machines became the first company to put a lander on the Moon, and Japan became the fifth nation to do so. Excitingly, China’s Chang’e-6 mission brought back the first rocks ever collected from the “far side” of the Moon, with signs of surprisingly young volcanism.

“After the Apollo missions, it was thought that the Moon was homogenous, and there was a feeling we’d ‘been there done that.’ We now know that’s not true; it’s much more rich and varied,” says planetary geologist John Spray of the University of New Brunswick in Canada. “There’s renewed excitement about what we can learn from the Moon.” NASA is planning to send people back to explore, starting with an orbital mission in 2025.

Aliens ahoy

There’s no proof of alien life as yet, but researchers keep looking. In July, NASA’s Perseverance rover took photos of an intriguing rock on Mars with leopard-pattern spots that could be evidence of ancient microbes. “These spots are a big surprise,” said David Flannery, an astrobiologist on the Perseverance science team, in a statement from NASA. “On Earth, these types of features in rocks are often associated with the fossilised record of microbes living in the subsurface.”

In May, astronomers spotted a planet, Gliese 12 b, that’s only slightly larger and warmer than Earth and could be habitable — one of a handful of Earth-like worlds among the more than 5,000 exoplanets spotted over the past 30 years, and among the closest such finds to date at just 40 light-years away.

Aliens may be top of mind for those captivated earlier this year by Netflix’s mind-bending 2024 sci-fi hit “3 Body Problem,” about an alien civilisation threatened by chaotic climate caused by unpredictable orbits of its three suns. The story is kicked off by a real-life event: a mysterious radio signal picked up in 1977 that is often conjectured to be a sign of intelligent communication. Sadly, this August the Planetary Habitability Laboratory at the University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo published a report proposing a natural origin for the so-called WOW! signal: the sudden brightening of a cold hydrogen cloud.

The show’s 3 Body Problem, by the way, is also a real-life puzzle in physics: how to predict the interaction of three large objects like stars in which none dominates the orbits of the others. Mathematicians made progress this year in finding a less computationally intensive way of calculating the outcomes of these chaotic systems.

This article was originally published on Knowable Magazine

From ChatGPT to o3: Revolutionary AI Model Achieves Human-Level General Intelligence

For many, the prospect of artificial general intelligence or AGI now seems more real, urgent and closer than anticipated.

A new artificial intelligence (AI) model has just achieved human-level results on a test designed to measure “general intelligence”.

On December 20, OpenAI’s o3 system scored 85% on the ARC-AGI benchmark, well above the previous AI best score of 55% and on par with the average human score. It also scored well on a very difficult mathematics test.

Creating artificial general intelligence, or AGI, is the stated goal of all the major AI research labs. At first glance, OpenAI appears to have at least made a significant step towards this goal.

While scepticism remains, many AI researchers and developers feel something just changed. For many, the prospect of AGI now seems more real, urgent and closer than anticipated. Are they right?

Generalisation and intelligence

To understand what the o3 result means, you need to understand what the ARC-AGI test is all about. In technical terms, it’s a test of an AI system’s “sample efficiency” in adapting to something new – how many examples of a novel situation the system needs to see to figure out how it works.

An AI system like ChatGPT (GPT-4) is not very sample efficient. It was “trained” on millions of examples of human text, constructing probabilistic “rules” about which combinations of words are most likely.

The result is pretty good at common tasks. It is bad at uncommon tasks, because it has less data (fewer samples) about those tasks.

Until AI systems can learn from small numbers of examples and adapt with more sample efficiency, they will only be used for very repetitive jobs and ones where the occasional failure is tolerable.

The ability to accurately solve previously unknown or novel problems from limited samples of data is known as the capacity to generalise. It is widely considered a necessary, even fundamental, element of intelligence.

Grids and patterns

The ARC-AGI benchmark tests for sample efficient adaptation using little grid square problems. The AI needs to figure out the pattern that turns the grid on the left into the grid on the right.

Each question gives three examples to learn from. The AI system then needs to figure out the rules that “generalise” from the three examples to the fourth.

These are a lot like the IQ tests sometimes you might remember from school.

Weak rules and adaptation

We don’t know exactly how OpenAI has done it, but the results suggest the o3 model is highly adaptable. From just a few examples, it finds rules that can be generalised.

To figure out a pattern, we shouldn’t make any unnecessary assumptions, or be more specific than we really have to be. In theory, if you can identify the “weakest” rules that do what you want, then you have maximised your ability to adapt to new situations.

What do we mean by the weakest rules? The technical definition is complicated, but weaker rules are usually ones that can be described in simpler statements.

In the example above, a plain English expression of the rule might be something like: “Any shape with a protruding line will move to the end of that line and ‘cover up’ any other shapes it overlaps with.”

Searching chains of thought?

While we don’t know how OpenAI achieved this result just yet, it seems unlikely they deliberately optimised the o3 system to find weak rules. However, to succeed at the ARC-AGI tasks it must be finding them.

We do know that OpenAI started with a general-purpose version of the o3 model (which differs from most other models, because it can spend more time “thinking” about difficult questions) and then trained it specifically for the ARC-AGI test.

French AI researcher Francois Chollet, who designed the benchmark, believes o3 searches through different “chains of thought” describing steps to solve the task. It would then choose the “best” according to some loosely defined rule, or “heuristic”.

Also read: Google’s Willow: A Quantum Leap (But With Baby Steps)

This would be “not dissimilar” to how Google’s AlphaGo system searched through different possible sequences of moves to beat the world Go champion.

You can think of these chains of thought like programs that fit the examples. Of course, if it is like the Go-playing AI, then it needs a heuristic, or loose rule, to decide which program is best.

There could be thousands of different seemingly equally valid programs generated. That heuristic could be “choose the weakest” or “choose the simplest”.

However, if it is like AlphaGo then they simply had an AI create a heuristic. This was the process for AlphaGo. Google trained a model to rate different sequences of moves as better or worse than others.

What we still don’t know

The question then is, is this really closer to AGI? If that is how o3 works, then the underlying model might not be much better than previous models.

The concepts the model learns from language might not be any more suitable for generalisation than before. Instead, we may just be seeing a more generalisable “chain of thought” found through the extra steps of training a heuristic specialised to this test. The proof, as always, will be in the pudding.

Almost everything about o3 remains unknown. OpenAI has limited disclosure to a few media presentations and early testing to a handful of researchers, laboratories and AI safety institutions.

Truly understanding the potential of o3 will require extensive work, including evaluations, an understanding of the distribution of its capacities, how often it fails and how often it succeeds.

When o3 is finally released, we’ll have a much better idea of whether it is approximately as adaptable as an average human.

If so, it could have a huge, revolutionary, economic impact, ushering in a new era of self-improving accelerated intelligence. We will require new benchmarks for AGI itself and serious consideration of how it ought to be governed.

If not, then this will still be an impressive result. However, everyday life will remain much the same.The Conversation

Michael Timothy Bennett is a PhD Student in School of Computing, Australian National University and Elija Perrier is a research fellow in Stanford Center for Responsible Quantum Technology, Stanford University. 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.

J&K Has 11 ‘High-Risk’ Alpine Lakes at Risk of Catastrophic GLOFs, Finds Study

Three teams of researchers from the University of Kashmir, the Central University of Jammu and the Geological Survey of India have conducted a first-of-its-kind study.

Srinagar: Jammu and Kashmir has 67 ‘potentially dangerous’ alpine lakes, 11 of which are ‘high-risk’ and require immediate intervention to mitigate the catastrophic glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) that could have an impact on hundreds of thousands of people living downstream, according to a new study.

The first of its kind study by three teams of researchers from the University of Kashmir, the Central University of Jammu and the Geological Survey of India (GSI) has warned that the stability of some alpine lakes could be “severely compromised” by external factors such as cloudbursts, mass movements, avalanches or earthquakes.

“These triggers could lead to rapid destabilisation, causing catastrophic outflows with potentially devastating impacts on downstream areas,” the study, which was commissioned by J&K administration through the Department of Disaster Management, Relief, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (DDMRRR) earlier this year to formulate risk mitigation strategies for tackling the looming threat of GLOF events in the Union territory (UT).

Global warming causes number of alpine lakes to increase

The UT of Jammu and Kashmir, which falls in the high risk seismic zone V, is home to more than 300 alpine lakes. In recent years, these lakes have attracted a high number of alpinists and trekking enthusiasts, raising concerns over the impact of growing human footprint in the eco-fragile Himalayan region.

Due to rapid melting of glaciers amid global warming, the number of alpine lakes and the size of some of the existing alpine lakes in Jammu and Kashmir has grown in the last two decades, according to experts.

A group of tourists from Mumbai on the trail to Greater Lakes of Pir Panjal region taking a break at Sandook Sar. Photo: Jehangir Ali.

The latest study, using advanced remote sensing tools and GIS-based analysis, noted that some alpine lakes in Jammu and Kashmir are dammed by rocks, a phenomenon that occurs when meltwater from retreating glaciers collects in depressions, giving these water bodies ‘a higher degree of stability’.

However, taking Sheshnag Lake in Anantnag as an example, the study found that some lakes have steep slopes that are prone to falling debris, which ‘adds to their vulnerability’. In some cases, such as Sona Sar lake, the researchers said that these lakes are vulnerable because of their ‘steep downstream slopes and deformed glacial feeder tongues’.

Tourist favourites at glacial retreat risk

The study has also warned that some alpine lakes, like Gangabal on ‘Kashmir Great Lakes’ trail which attracts the highest number of professional mountain climbers and trekking enthusiasts every year during summers, pose risk due to glacial retreat which has resulted in “expanding water volume and unstable terrains nearby”.

Professor Pervez Ahmed, who heads the Department of Geography and Disaster Management at the University of Kashmir, said that an inventory of all glacial lakes in Jammu and Kashmir has been prepared after studying their geological structure, volume of water, risk factors, among other parameters approved by the National Disaster Management Authority and the Central Water Commission.

While the University of Kashmir led the study in Kashmir Valley, the alpine lakes in Jammu region were studied by a team led by Prof Sunil Dhar of the Department of Environmental Sciences, Central University of Jammu.

Bram Sar lake, which is located in the higher reaches of south Kashmir’s Kulgam district, was studied by a team of the Geological Survey of India.

The researchers have classified the lakes into four categories – from mildly dangerous to high risk.

“The findings are based on preliminary field studies backed by scientific data. We need to get funding and proper instrumentation, even if through collaborative projects, to devise effective mitigation strategies,” professor Ahmed said.

A cloud of fog floating above Bhag Sar, the third largest alpine lake in Kashmir Valley. Photo: Jehangir Ali.

The preliminary findings of these studies, accessed by The Wire, noted that there are three high-risk lakes – Mundikeswar, Hangu Lake and an unnamed lake in the Kishtwar district of Jammu – that are ‘highly hazardous’, while the remaining eight such alpine lakes are located in the Kashmir valley.

Kishtwar risk greatest

The study has identified Kishtwar in Chenab valley of Jammu division as the “most vulnerable” district of the Union territory.

“These lakes exhibit characteristics such as unstable moraines, steep downstream gradients, and proximity to unstable glacier tongues, making them critical for targeted mitigation measures,” the study, which is being coordinated by Dr Binay Kumar, Associate Director at the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing Ahmedabad, noted.

According to a 2023 study by the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, more than 70% of the 700 GLOFs in the world since 1833 have taken place in the past 50 years with the year 1980 witnessing the highest number (15) of GLOF events followed by 13 in 2015.

A GLOF event struck Chorabari Lake in Uttarakhand’s Kedarnath in June 2013, killing thousands of residents, pilgrims and tourists, some of whom were never found, in what became known as the country’s worst natural disaster since the 2004 tsunami.

In April this year, the J&K administration set up a ‘Focused Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Monitoring Committee’ to study the increasing risk of glacial lake overflows which pose a grave risk to lives and livelihoods in the Union territory.

An official said that the research has thrown up “valuable data on the lake conditions, surrounding environmental factors and potential risks of GLOF events” that will be used to formulate “risk mitigation strategy”, including the deployment of early warning systems.

An official spokesperson of DDMRRR said that the strategy, which has not yet been made public, would be implemented in two phases and a Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Early Warning System (EWS) is also proposed to be established to “enhance preparedness”.