ISRO SpaDeX Mission: India Becomes Fourth Country To Complete Docking Experiment

ISRO said that after docking and control of two satellites as a single object is successful, undocking and power transfer checks will follow.

New Delhi: India became the fourth country, after the US, Russia and China, to successfully execute the SpaDeX docking experiment on Thursday (January 16). ISRO announced the success in a post on X. 

“Spacecraft docking successfully completed! A historic moment. Let’s walk through the SpaDeX docking process: Manoeuvre from 15m to 3m hold point completed. Docking initiated with precision, leading to successful spacecraft capture. Retraction completed smoothly, followed by rigidisation for stability. Docking successfully completed. India became the 4th country to achieve successful Space Docking. Congratulations to the entire team! Congratulations to India!” the post read.

The two satellites SDX01 (Chaser) and SDX02 (Target) – launched by the PSLV C60 on December 30, 2024 – executed the manoeuvre under the watch of officials from the Mission Operations Complex (MOX) at ISRO Telemetry, Tracking, and Command Network (ISTRAC).

The space research organisation also said that after docking and control of two satellites as a single object is successful, undocking and power transfer checks will follow in the coming days.

On January 12, ISRO had moved the satellites within 15 metres and then 3 metres of each other in a trial attempt. It had then moved the spacecraft back to safe distance.

Docking is a complex process, designed to develop and demonstrate the technology needed for spacecraft rendezvous, docking and undocking using two small satellites.

The demonstration of this technology is essential for future missions such as sending an Indian astronaut on the Moon, sample return from the Moon, the building and operation of the Indian Space Station, the Hindu reported.

“After successful docking and rigidisation, electrical power transfer between the two satellites will be demonstrated before undocking and separation of the two satellites to start the operation of their respective payloads for the expected mission life of up to two years,” ISRO said.

The SpaDeX docking was originally scheduled on January 7 but was postponed to January 9. It was postponed a second time when the drift between the two satellites was found to be more than expected. 

A Silk Road in Space: China’s Space Plan for 2050

The program outlines five key themes and three phases highlighting China’s priorities for the space sector over the next 25 years.

Space exploration is a vital field of scientific and technological progress, serving as a powerful symbol of a nation’s scientific and technological prowess. This has been a central feature of President Xi Jinping’s vision for China’s future in space.

In 2013, Xi emphasized on developing a robust space program and transforming China into a space power. In September 2024, Xi reiterated the importance of this vision by calling for an accelerated push in China’s space sector. 

His remarks marked a growing recognition of the importance of both the public and private sectors in advancing China’s space ambitions. Xi’s emphasis on the role of the private aerospace sector indicates that this sector could play a crucial role in propelling China’s space exploration, which otherwise has been mostly a People’s Liberation Army-controlled activity. 

China’s successes in space

Xi’s 2013 pronouncement came a decade after China’s successful crewed spacecraft mission in 2003. Over the past two decades, China has taken notable steps in space exploration. 

To date, China has launched around 14 human space missions and their astronauts (taikonauts) have successfully carried out spacewalks. Another major achievement by China is the assembly of the Tiangong space station (November 2022) which is now fully operational, with taikonauts continuously living and working over there. 

China’s lunar exploration efforts have been equally notable. Their first lunar mission (Chang’e 1) was launched in October 2007. By December 2013, during its third mission (Chang’e 3), China successfully landed a rover and lander system on the Moon. 

In May 2024, China’s Chang’e 6 mission (a sample return mission) delivered approximately 2 kg of lunar soil to Earth. China’s exploration of Mars began with the Tianwen-1 mission in 2020. During this first mission itself China has successfully put a lander and rover system on the Martian surface. 

Also read: When Everything in the Universe Changed

Plan for the future

With such significant achievements in space over the past few decades, China has recently (October 2024) articulated its agenda for space exploration from 2024 to 2050. 

This progressive plan shows that China first ensured the establishment of a solid foundation for its space program. Today, the country has reached a certain level of technological growth, where key innovations are happening. The US space agency NASA is not allowed to collaborate with China however they have some important other foreign collaborations are in place. 

Moreover, China has addressed challenges related to supply chains, ensuring minimal disruption to its space missions. Only after securing these critical elements has China embarked on defining the future trajectory of its space activities. It is important to critically look at these ambitious goals declared by China and understand its rationale. 

China unveiled a national mid- and long-term development program for space science in mid-October 2024. The program outlines five key themes and three distinct phases highlighting their priorities for the space sector over the next 25 years.

The five key scientific themes include 

  1. The extreme universe 
  2. Space-time ripples
  3. Panoramic view of Sun-Earth system
  4. Habitable planets
  5. Biological and Physical sciences in space

Some specifics about these five themes as explained by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) are as follows:

Extreme universe: The focus is on exploring the origin and evolution of the universe, revealing the physical laws under extreme cosmic conditions. Efforts would also be made towards the detection of cosmic baryonic matter.

Space-time ripples: Here, the idea is to detect medium to low-frequency gravitational waves and primordial gravitational waves, with the goal of uncovering the nature of gravity and space-time. The priority area is space-based gravitational wave detection.

Sun-Earth panoramic view: This refers to the exploration of the Sun, the Earth, and the heliosphere. The purpose would be to unravel the physical processes and laws governing the complex interactions within the Sun-Earth system. Importance would be given towards understating Earth’s cycle systems. There would be efforts towards developing comprehensive observations of the Earth-Moon system, space weather, three-dimensional solar exploration and heliosphere exploration. 

Habitability of celestial bodies: Scientists will explore the solar system and exoplanets to assess their feasibility for human habitation. A search for extraterrestrial life, the origin and evolution of the solar system, characterization of planetary atmospheres and exoplanet detection would also be an important query under this phase. 

Biological and physical sciences in space:  Here, the idea is to interrogate the laws of matter movement and life activities under space conditions to deepen the understanding of fundamental physics. Important priority areas include microgravity science, quantum mechanics and general relativity, and space life sciences.

The program also outlines a roadmap for the development of space under three different phases:

  1. First phase (2024-2027): Focus on space station operations and implementation of the manned lunar exploration project alongside planetary exploration. Some important projects are expected to be presented and around five to eight space science satellite missions are likely to get approved during the period:
  2. Second phase (2028 -2035): Construction of the international lunar research station. This seven-year phase is expected to see the launch of around 15 scientific satellite missions. 
  3. Third phase (2036-2050): Over 30 space science missions are likely to be launched.

Assessment 

The 2024-2050 program was jointly released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the China National Space Administration (CNSA) and the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA).  These are the primary institutions responsible for executing China’s space science and exploration initiatives.  

From deep space exploration to understanding other planets, China is proposing to study almost every area of space science. The financial investments towards undertaking such studies is going to be significant. At the same time, there would be a lot of research related uncertainties involved. This indicates that China is not looking for any immediate economic benefits and can play the waiting game. They understand the long-term importance of such research investments. They seem keen to emerge as leaders in space science.

Also read: A Look at China’s Ambitious Spaceplane Missions

China’s space program has strong commercial underpinnings and its future agenda appears to align closely with its broader space vision. Beyond routine commercial activities such as satellite development and launches, and associated applications like communication, Earth observation and navigation, China is likely looking to engage industry in planetary resource exploration. 

After collecting samples from the Moon with the Tianwen-3 mission, China is planning to collect Martian samples. Currently, there is no global consensus on how to regulate space mining, and China seems eager to position itself as an early player, leveraging geopolitical dynamics to gain a strategic advantage in this emerging area.

For China, space is a key tool in its foreign policy. China’s ambitious project called the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) extends beyond traditional infrastructure and includes a Space Silk Road. China is keen on increasing its space assistance and collaboration with BRI member states. For them, space is also about strengthening their geopolitical influence. 

In collaboration with Russia, China announced the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) project in 2021, which now has more than 10 partner countries. This project is a rival to the US led Artemis program, as both projects aim to establish long-term human presence on the Moon and beyond.

Broadly, China’s agenda for the future looks to be very closely connected to space science and economics.  It is not the purpose over here to view China’s space agenda through a narrow militaristic lens. However, the true fountainhead of China’s space program lies with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Therefore, the PLA’s central role – particularly that of the PLA Strategic Support Force (PLASSF) – is expected to persist while the CAS, CNSA and CMSA become the front-end agencies implementing the overall space agenda.

Space technologies are inherently dual-use technologies. Despite China’s space development plan being primarily focused on scientific exploration, there always would be strategic angles associated with it. 

A simple example of this could be the Chinese proposal to study space weather. For any space situational awareness (SSA) mechanism, space weather is a subpart. The military relevance of SSA is well-known. Space weather would have an impact on satellite communications and satellite-based navigation accuracy. Such investments would help China towards keeping its military satellite network safe. Various technological innovations and technological developments which may take place during the next 25 years could find some direct or indirect utility for the PLA’s space agenda. 

It is important to recognise that China has announced an ambitious roadmap for space sciences extending to 2050. However, this does not imply a narrow focus on space sciences alone for the next two to three decades. It is unlikely that China would openly articulate its military space plans.

The strategic underpinning of China’s space program is to enhance national security through military space capabilities and assert global leadership in space exploration and technology. China understands that ‘optics’ are very important to demonstrate their technologies and the first phase of this program involves sending humans to the Moon before 2030, to surpass the United States in the space race.

Ajey Lele researches space issues and is the author of the book Institutions That Shaped Modern India: ISRO.

ISRO and SpaceX: India Needs to Realise There’s No Such Thing as a Free Launch

The key question now is whether ISRO has its priorities in order.

On November 18, 2024, India‘s most advanced communications satellite was launched by Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The rocket used for the launch of this satellite was the Falcon-9. This satellite – GSAT-N2 (or GSAT 20) – was put in geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO).  This communications satellite will provide broadband services in remote areas and in-flight Internet in passenger aircraft. Now the satellite is on its way towards geostationary orbit (36,000 km about the Earth’s surface).  This satellite is a project of New Space India Limited, which is the Indian Space Research Organisation’s commercial arm.

GSAT-20’s mission life is 14 years. It has been reported that this is for the first time ISRO has built a satellite that only uses the advanced Ka band frequency, a range of radio frequencies between 27 and 40 gigahertz (GHz), which enables the satellite to have higher bandwidth.

This is the first time ISRO has used SpaceX’s services for launching a heavy satellite into GTO. For many years, ISRO used the services of Ariane Space for launching such satellites. This is a French company founded in March 1980 as the world’s first commercial launch service provider.

ISRO has an old connection with Ariane Space. Its Apple satellite was launched by the Ariane-1 launch vehicle in 1981. Subsequently, Ariane-3 and Ariane-4 vehicles were used for launching around six to seven Indian satellites during the 1980s-1990s. Since 2000, ISRO has been using the Ariane-5 for launching its heavy satellites. The notable launches were the launch of the 5854 kg GSAT-11 satellite in December 2018 and the 4181.3 kg GSAT-24 satellite in June 2022. Now, with the arrival of the Ariane-6 rocket, perhaps ISRO was not able to avail the services of this new vehicle when the requirement arose and thus opted for SpaceX.

The Falcon-9 is a partially reusable rocket and can lift up to 8,300 kg to GTO. The first launch of the Falcon-9 was in June 2010. Till date, this rocket has undertaken around 400 launches, with a 99.26% success rate.   On average, the costs of a launch are about $70 million. Ariane-5 cost about $178 million per launch. But, interestingly Ariane-6’s costs are less, around $80 million per launch.

Recently, ISRO had asked a European space consulting firm, Novaspace, to undertake a ‘Socio-Economic Impact Analysis of the Indian Space Programme’. As per this report the investment made in the space programme has immensely benefited society and the economic impact of money spent in space in India has been 2.5 times the investment. The report indicates that cumulatively over the last decade the Indian space sector has stimulated the national economy to the tune of $60 billion, supported 4.7 million jobs, and boosted public funds to the tune of $24 billion in tax revenues. From ISRO’s point of view, there would have been additional savings during the last few decades, if it did not have to depend on outside agencies for launching their heavy satellites.

ISRO’s inability to develop a heavy satellite launch vehicle is actually impacting the progress of India’s space programme. Money saving is only one aspect, but what is more concerning is that the inability to carry heavy payloads in higher orbits limits ISRO’s capabilities in various fields. For example, they can undertake missions to the Moon and Mars, but such missions mostly remain as technology demonstration missions. ISRO did carry a few scientific payloads during these missions and during the first mission to the Moon (2008) was able to identify the presence of water on the Moon. However, they had major limitations in regards to payload carrying capability and hence could undertake very limited scientific experimentation.  The Mars and Chandrayaan-3 missions cost around $75 million each. However, the total weight of the payload for the Mars mission was 15 kg and the rover which operated on the lunar surface was 26 kg in weight. This has restricted much of our scientific experimentation.

Development of heavy satellite launch vehicles is one arena where ISRO has been struggling for many years. ISRO has had a Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) program in place for more than two decades. Since 2001, ISRO has undertaken few launches by using the GSLV Mk I system. GSLV Mk II has been used for undertaking space launches to GTO since 2010. This vehicle can carry up to 2,250 kg payload to GTO and till date more than 10 launches have taken place.  However, the process to develop the next version of this vehicle has been very slow.  GSLV-Mk III which is also known as LMV Mk-III is known to be capable of launching 4-ton (4000 kg) class satellites to GTO. In June 2017, GSLV-Mk III-D1, the first developmental flight of this vehicle, launched a 3136 kg GSAT-19 satellite and in November 2018, the 3,423 kg GSAT 29 was launched. All this indicates that for launching modern commutations (and weather) satellites – which are mostly in the 4 to 6-ton class – ISRO still has to depend on other agencies.


India requires a heavy satellite launcher for scientific, commercial and strategic reasons. For long, ISRO faced challenges due to sanctions, particularly from the US, which prevented the transfer of critical cryogenic engine technology for launchers from Russia. It took ISRO a significant amount of time to indigenously operationalise this technology. Another crucial area for enhancing the GSLV (Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle) system is semi-cryogenic technology, which ISRO has been working on for several years.

The key question now is whether ISRO has its priorities in order. Over the years, ISRO has achieved significant success by innovating and making efficient use of available resources. However, there is a limit to what can be achieved by merely modifying and refining existing technologies. The US, Russia, China, the European Space Agency, and even private players like SpaceX remain dominant in the space arena due to significant investment in the development of a wide range of launch vehicles.

While ambitious goals such as sending an Indian astronaut to the Moon, establishing an Indian space station, and planning a mission to Venus are commendable, these missions are likely to remain technology demonstrations rather than breakthroughs in space science. The global community will undoubtedly celebrate ISRO’s achievements, and there will be a sense of national pride. However, one must ask: how much substantial contribution to science (technology) can these missions make on a global scale? India’s first mission to the Moon in 2008 was followed by the second mission in 2019, with a gap of more than 10 years. We have conducted just one mission to Mars in 2014. India wants to become the third nation to land on Mars and undertake helicopter flying there as was done by NASA. However, there is not much clarity about when this mission would take place. Now, ISRO is planning a sample return mission from the Moon, which is indeed a positive step forward. But the ability to plan such missions is constrained by the limitations of our launcher systems. The age of only demonstrating capabilities is over. What is important is the value addition an agency can make to existing knowledge about the Moon and Mars.

The question arises: has ISRO spread itself too thin? Are they doing too many things together? Shouldn’t the organization first focus on mastering the fundamentals before venturing into highly ambitious goals?

Many years ago, India’s former president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam argued that the country’s innovations were suffering from a “fifth-nation syndrome”. He pointed out that India has often been seen as the fourth or fifth nation to contribute new ideas, whether in space exploration or nuclear technology. If ISRO aims to be a true global leader, it must move beyond this syndrome and aim for the top. This is only possible if ISRO develops the capacity to undertake heavy satellite launches.

Ajey Lele researches space issues and is the author of the book Institutions That Shaped Modern India: ISRO. He is Deputy Director General at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi.

This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.

Former Bureaucrat Urges Caution Over Govt’s Satellite Spectrum Allocation to Elon Musk’s Starlink

“Once allotted satellite spectrum, a foreign player like Starlink can have unlimited access to personal and public data systems in India, with no bar on the company using the same across geographic borders,” E.A.S. Sarma noted.

New Delhi: E.A.S. Sarma, former secretary to the Union government, has raised concerns in an open letter addressed to Neeraj Mittal, secretary of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), regarding the department’s recent steps toward administratively allotting satellite spectrum to foreign companies, specifically Elon Musk’s Starlink.

In his letter, Sarma highlighted the public interest risks of permitting foreign companies like Starlink to access satellite spectrum without a competitive process, noting the security implications tied to the company’s alleged connections with the US military. According to Sarma, Starlink’s satellite technology, branded as Starshield, possesses advanced capabilities for accommodating diverse payloads which include military-grade radar, infrared missile detection and optical surveillance systems. Given these capabilities, Sarma cautioned that any spectrum allocation to Starlink could risk exposing Indian data systems and sensitive communications infrastructure to foreign surveillance.

“It is important to understand that Starlink is not so much a means of satellite communication, but a time-tested reliable satellite bus technology that can accommodate various payloads as needed, including radars, optical cameras, and infrared (IR) missile launch signaling systems. It is obvious that the Pentagon is interested in getting the most it can out of the functionality provided by Starshield satellites,” he noted, referencing reports about the US defence department’s involvement with SpaceX’s Starlink. “Once allotted satellite spectrum, a foreign player like Starlink can have unlimited access to personal and public data systems in India, with no bar on the company using the same across geographic borders.”

Sarma refers to an earlier letter he wrote on the “illegality involved in the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) administratively allotting strategic satellite spectrum to telecom service providers, especially the public interest implications of allotting it to foreign players.”

He argues that the DoT’s actions bypass the auction-based allocation procedure, which was mandated by the Supreme Court to ensure transparency and fair market value in the allocation of spectrum, a highly valuable national resource. Sarma warned that circumventing this procedure could amount to contempt of court, undermining the transparency that the Supreme Court called for in its landmark 2G spectrum judgment.

Also read: Russia-Ukraine War: Starlink Row Offers a Cautionary Tale on Role of Private Space Industry in Wars

“I am surprised that the DOT should obstinately go ahead allowing Elon Musk’s Starlink to have access to satellite spectrum without going through the apex-court-prescribed transparent auction procedure… It defies all economic logic of discovering the price of a valuable natural resource like spectrum through competitive means,” wrote Sarma.

Union telecom minister Jyotiraditya Scindia announced on Tuesday, November 12, that the decision to launch Starlink would depend on recommendations from the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), which was conducting a consultation process, according to a report in the Hindu.

Sarma’s letter also emphasised that allocating spectrum to foreign players, particularly those tied to foreign powers, could open doors to security vulnerabilities and misuse of data. “It will be prudent for DOT to reserve satellite spectrum for purely strategic purposes that subserve the national interest, such as use by ISRO, the Indian defence forces and CPSEs involved in strategic communications activity for such organisations,” he added.

Sarma appealed to the government to exercise caution and reserve this spectrum for strategic, nation-serving purposes.

 

Chandrayaan-3 Finds Evidence of Global Lunar Surface Magma Ocean

Meteorites dug up the layers that cooled from this magma ocean and mixed up the rocks in them.

The moon’s surface used to be covered in an ocean of magma before it cooled. Afterwards, it was constantly bombarded by meteorites, which dug up heavier minerals that had sunk to the layers below, according to a study published by a team of Indian researchers in the journal Nature on August 21.

It settles earlier debates about whether the magma ocean covered all of the moon’s surface.

The theory of a magma ocean

According to one theory, the top 1,000 kilometres of the moon’s surface was covered in molten magma immediately after its birth about 4.5 billion years ago.

In the next hundreds of millions of years, heavier minerals like pyroxene and olivine (which are rock-forming mineral groups that are also present in the earth’s mantle) settled below lighter elements like plagioclase (a mineral belonging to what is called the feldspar group, which contain both alumina and silica). As the moon cooled, these elements settled in layers.

Rock samples from the Apollo and Luna missions from near the equator and Chinese missions from the mid-latitudes supported this theory, and the present study using Chandrayaan-3 data from near its poles provides more evidence in its favour.

A team of Indian researchers studied the elements on the lunar soil at about 70 degrees latitude of the moon. They made 23 observations using the Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer (APXS) on the Pragyan rover, dispatched by the Vikram lander of Chandrayaan-3 last August.

The team was based in the Physical Research Laboratory (PRL) and Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad, the Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna University in Uttarakhand’s Srinagar, and the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), Bengaluru.

Like the previous missions that studied rocks from the lower and mid-latitudes, the study found rocks of the type ferroan anorthosite, rich in plagioclase.

“The southern region being dominated by these rocks gives strong evidence that these rocks are spread all over the moon, which could only happen because of the magma ocean,” said Santosh V. Vadawale from the PRL, one of the authors of the study.

However, the study found that this type of rock was not the only kind in these latitudes: about one-fourth of rocks contained lighter magnesium minerals, pyroxene and olivine.

These lighter elements were later dug over billions of years by meteorites, which formed craters of various sizes inside bigger craters called basins. Each meteorite carried bits and pieces of these lighter rocks to the top layers, giving rise to a mixture of rock types at these latitudes.

“All the pieces are coming together,” said Vadawale.

Senthil Kumar Perumal, a scientist at the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, who is not associated with the study, supported the findings. He explained that the location of the Chandrayaan-3 landing site exposed it to a large amount of lighter minerals from the lower layers due to a larger possibility of meteorites’ impact.

“The South Pole Aitken basin is the largest impact basin on the Moon, and the Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located on top of the debris materials that were produced from the … basin,” he said.

But could there be more to the layers?

But not all experts agree with this interpretation of the measurements.

A planetary geologist who did not wish to be named for fear of retaliation said that the results could be explained without the mixing caused by meteorites. They said the mixing was advanced by measurements from low latitudes by the Apollo missions, but the reality could be a more complicated mixture of magnesium-rich rocks near the poles.

The mixing hypothesis rests on the fact that there is a lower fraction of magnesium-heavy minerals in the top layers. However, if there were more pyroxene and olivine-heavy rocks near the poles as the moon cooled, then mixing is not required at all.

There is some evidence for this claim. Lunar meteorites are pieces of moon rock launched from various parts of the moon by meteorites that eventually land on Earth. Since 1979, close to 400 lunar meteorites have been discovered. Scientists studying these rocks have proposed a complicated mixture of magnesium rocks at high latitudes, which could naturally explain the present observations, said the expert.

Vadawale agreed that the interpretation of their Nature study is debatable, but that their measurements of the fractions of the different minerals in the high-altitude rocks are robust. All experts The Wire spoke to agreed.

Debdutta Paul is a freelance science journalist.

Ram Rajya’s Dalliance With Science Is a Lesson for Us

To allow religious heads or corporates to intervene in the organic path of scientific exercises and regular data collection is to invite chaos and hostilities.

“I imagined myself sitting on the end of a beam of light and imagined what I would see.”

– Albert Einstein

I remembered the words when a photo on the front page of one of the highest selling Hindi dailies caught my eye this morning. It showed our Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, sitting huddled over a tablet inside a plane after an election rally in Assam’s Nalbari. The photo shows him gravely looking at a sunbeam anointing the forehead of the newly installed statue of Ram Lalla on Ram Navami.

If only Einstein were here to see the image! 

Mrinal Pande

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

This year a few days before India began the democratic exercise of voting in a government, the rays of the noon time sun were cleverly directed to fall directly on the idol’s forehead on his birthday. The media was told by the chairman of the temple building trust that the idea came from the PM himself. He wanted a merging of tradition and high science to create a memorable image within the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. It was duly done and the moment was described by an excited agency reporter as though the sun himself was applying a ‘raj tilak’ upon the newly installed idol of Ram. It was hugely symbolic since Ram’s Ikshwaku clan is said to have descended from the sun god and is called Suryavanshi. The caption beneath the photo also underscored that even though he was in Assam, the PM watched the holy ritual live, feet bare out of reverence. 

Later the PM himself posted the photo on the popular social media platform X saying he was supremely lucky to have witnessed the magical moment. It had made him feel sentimental (“bhavuk”) and newly energised. He was sure millions of Indians watching the holy ritual must also have experienced similar joy and excitement.

Posts on X (earlier called tweets) from usually reliable sources explained how the feat was achieved. After the PM desired that the celebrations showcase both the ancient and the modern, the Indian Institute of Astrophysics in Bengaluru (an autonomous body under the Department of Science and Technology) was tasked to do a special ‘Surya Tilak Project’. It consisted of steering a beam of the sun from the third floor of the yet to be completed temple, straight into the Garbha Griha and ensuring it fell directly on the forehead of the deity. The scientists swung into motion. A device was manufactured in Bengaluru and the installation at the site was mentored by another apex institute of engineering, the Central Building Research Institute (CBRI) in Roorkee. Together they, through a scientific positioning of four mirrors and two lenses that guided the sun rays at the auspicious hour decided by the priests, did it. We were also told that once the top (‘shikhara’) is in place, a permanent aperture will be created so the feat can be recreated year after year! This feat would be executed with four mirrors and four lenses. And since the Roman calendar repeats the position of the sun only once in 19 years on this auspicious day, care has been taken to tweak the system astronomically to follow the sun’s position according to the Hindu lunar calendar and direct its rays at the hour set by the priests.

Also read: The Ruling Elite Can Create Ram Rajya. Will They?

Whoever scrutinises the photograph of the honourable PM sitting reverentially hunched over his tablet with bare feet, eminent Hindi papers and anchors told us, will understand that the PM has an acute sense of mission – bringing in Ram Rajya to India ASAP. Once he wins a third term, and he is sure he will, he has declared his intent to introduce a barrage of reforms for the next decade. It will be revolutionary and galvanise not only the techies, corporates and SMEs in metro cities but also the laidback, somnolent youth in the ancient cities of Ayodhya, Kashi , Ujjain, Haridwar and Kashi to get going and turn these small pilgrim towns into smart tourist hubs that will generate jobs and big money. According to reports, bands of committed bureaucrats are already hard at work on blueprints. Thus Bharat, the mother of democracy, is Vishwa Guru.

Many more roads, railways, schools of medicine and high-tech airports and grand new (Bhavya-Nvya) residential quarters will be required for Bharat (no longer referred to as India) to take the big leap into Ram Rajya.

It doesn’t matter if completion of the dream takes five years or 10 or 25, the important fact is that the archetype spelt out by the ritual – and the leader watching the ritual within his aircraft – occupies the collective conscience of Bharat that was India. 

The question arises, are we the people of this vast nation, ready to take a somewhat strange pendulous big leap that takes us backwards and then forward at the same time against the known laws of physics? This is where the scientists and event managers and priests may step on to the stage and dazzle us once again with mirrors and lenses placed just so.

In 2014 Europe and the US and their media after the new PM’s visits abroad, expected a furthering of Gandhi and Nehru’s ideals for India’s development as a vast, modern and market friendly democratic state led by the rightwing. The leadership no doubt exuded charismatic vibes and made sure during the visits to attend events that  showcased  NRIs’ vast admiration for him. He also continued to pay homage to the Buddha and Gandhi and our ancient and principled stand on world peace, encapsulated in the phrase Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam. But post COVID-19, things began to change. Even now when touring within the country the leader certainly creates a passionate atmosphere with speeches about ‘achhe din’, women’s empowerment and our great and rich intellectual traditions. But voices from the margin, especially in the east and down south, are raising question marks over a Ram Rajya that would be basically rooted in Brahmanical codes set by Manu, in Sanskrit. 

Also read | Interview: The BJP May Defend ‘Sanatan Dharma’, But Can’t Define What it Means

Hindi of the north becoming the Rashtra Bhasha, along with Brahminism, touch a certain painful nerve south of the Vindhyas.  That the leader works hard and is very well informed, of that there is no doubt. Also, most would agree there is no corruption in him. But by now several verified reports reveal there is corruption in the state and many regulatory bodies, and huge amounts of black money are being used to buy up elected representatives. Frequent defections have brought down popular governments in several states. Then there is the prolonged incarceration of several naysayers and opposition leaders under yet-to-be-proven charges. All that seems contrary to the  common image of Ram’s Rajya where all lived equally happy lives, “Jasu raj sub praja sukhari”. Even the shot inside the aircraft cannot dispel a certain edginess in the face, proof that here is an intelligent man who is aware of the situation where unemployment and inflation will continue to generate huge pressures even after the battle is won. 

As  the Surya Tilak ritual has revealed, there are thousands of temples and 33 crore deities but the ultimate secret divinity of our century is science. Algorithms are our ultimate go-to solution when it comes to everything from preparing blueprints for a grand temple to building roads and homes. We need science more than almanacs, algos more than Sanskrit for building a modern democracy. We need to go from directing the sun’s rays on Ram Navami, to landing on the moon. To allow religious heads or corporates to intervene in the organic path of scientific exercises and regular data collection is to invite chaos and hostilities.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I am not sure about the universe,” Einstein had said.

Saakhi is a Sunday column from Mrinal Pande, in which she writes of what she sees and also participates in. That has been her burden to bear ever since she embarked on a life as a journalist, writer, editor, author and as chairperson of Prasar Bharti. Her journey of being a witness-participant continues.

Space Colonisation Vs Earth’s Liveability, What Should Be Our Priority?

Sending humans to space without an overarching vision to save our future will end up as a mere flag-waving show. The space surrounding the Earth is now becoming a junkyard with defunct satellites and metal debris posing a threat to newly launched space vehicles.

Former US President Barack Obama had a message for the likes of Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, the super-rich of the world. Speaking at a renewable energy conference during the recent 2024 POwR.Earth Summit in Paris, Obama criticised Silicon Valley tycoons who are building spaceships for engaging in costly and ambitious plans to colonise the solar system while we are staring at a bleak future for the Earth due to degrading living space.

Elon Musk, for example, is reported to have launched his aerospace company, SpaceX with an investment of around $100 million. And Jeff Bezos may have invested between $7.5 billion and $20 billion in his aerospace company, Blue Origin. Unlike Elon Musk, who is targeting the human colonisation of Mars, Bezos wants to explore the potential of space stations that can be converted into large space stations near Earth. He visualise “a trillion humans living in the solar system”, who could opt to visit the Earth on holiday.

The former US president in the Paris meeting said, “But when I hear some of the people talk about the plan to colonise Mars because the earth’s environment may become so degraded that it becomes unlivable, I look at them like, what are you talking about?” He continued, “I would rather us invest in taking care of this planet here”. He said that space exploration should be pursued for gathering knowledge and discovery rather than creating new living space for humanity.  “We were designed for this place, and it would be good if we kept this place in a way that’s liveable,” he concluded.

It is also appropriate here to point out that Barack Obama should also have been critical of the political class to which he belongs. The fact is that many rich countries’ political leadership is equally megalomaniacal in promoting human spaceflight programmes. Politicians who typically baulk when asked to invest in climate-change mitigation or fundamental research jump at the chance to release the purse strings for spaceflight – even if they are of dubious relevance.

A case in point: the ‘space command’, which the US, China, and India, are currently engaged in setting up. As a result of such showmanship, we are militarising space in earnest. If taken to its logical conclusion, this will further damage a world already divided along religious, racial, class and caste lines. Remembering that India has been an active votary of the peaceful use of outer space is beneficial. Back in 1968, Vikram Sarabhai, then chairman of The Indian National Committee of Space Research, was the scientific chairman of the first UN Conference on the peaceful use of outer space.

The Government of India invested more than Rs 10,000 crore for the country’s first human spaceflight programme, to be possibly fulfilled in July 2024. Called Gaganyaan, the project is part of India’s efforts to portray itself as a global space power or at least place itself on par with China. Under this project, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) plans to send three Indian astronauts to low-Earth orbit for a little less than a week and return them safely. When such space initiatives are announced, the fundamental question should revolve around their overall rationale and expected scientific outcome.  One such question is of priorities: is it worth investing in a programme that may not be able to produce any concrete scientific benefits?

Like the Mars Orbital and Chandrayaan missions, besides the technology development, what do we hope to achieve in terms of new insights other than being a flag-waving exercise? As pointed out by Arup Dasgupta, former deputy director of the Space Applications Centre, ISRO, in an article in The Wire of March 2019, it is moot as to why India did not join the International Space Station programme if it was also committed to an ‘Indian in space’ programme.

Also read: ISRO Doesn’t Have a Satisfactory Answer to Why It Wants to Put Indians in Space

The debates in the West mainly revolve around the point that the survival of humanity depends on expanding beyond the confines of our planet, which Jeff Bezos repeats in response to Obama’s critique. The celebrated physicist the late Steven Weinberg, also a well-known science communicator in his book, Third Thoughts (2018), is dismissive of such arguments.

He says, “Manned spaceflight is a spectator sport, which can be exciting for spectators, but this is not the sort of excitement that seems to lead to anything serious.” Rather than from human space flights. Much of the breakthroughs on the origin and evolution of the universe have all been derived from data generated by space-based observatories like the Cosmic Background Explorer and the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. The newly constructed Simons Observatory in the Atacama desert in Chile will now add more observations on the early universe.

The Hubble space telescope belongs in this league, as the most significant space-based observatory, now succeeded by the James Webb Space Telescope. Robotic missions – like the Curiosity rover on Mars, the Yutu rover on the Moon, JUNO around Jupiter, and the Hayabusa 2 probe at the Ryugu asteroid – are expanding our horizons. After a seven-year round trip, NASA’s OSIRIS-REx brought rock samples to Earth on 24 September 2023 from an asteroid named Bennu—billions of kilometres from Earth.

Lori Garver, a former deputy administrator of NASA, wrote a piece titled “Forget New Crewed Missions in Space. NASA Should Focus on Saving Earth” in The Washington Post dated 18 July 2019: “NASA remains one of the most revered and valuable brands in the world, and the agency is at its best when given a purpose. But the public doesn’t understand the purpose of spending massive amounts of money to send a few astronauts to the moon or Mars. Are we in another race, and if so, is this the most valuable display of our scientific and technological leadership? If science is the rationale, we can send robots for pennies on the dollar”.

Consider the US National Academy of Sciences’ decadal strategy for Earth Science and Applications from Space (ESAS). For example, ESAS 2017 declared that NASA should prioritise the study of the global hydrological cycle; the distribution and movement of mass between oceans, ice sheets, groundwater and the atmosphere; and changes in surface biology and geology.

Since its humble beginnings in Thumba, a small hamlet near Thiruvananthapuram, in 1963, ISRO has also made commendable contributions, including achievements in communications and remote sensing. We must also ask what the future priorities of our publicly funded space science and technology initiatives are and the science thereof. The wish list can include targets to develop comprehensive Earth observation systems and build linkages to higher education centres in the country that could then conduct research based on the data obtained from Earth and planetary observation systems.

Sending humans to space without an overarching vision to save our future will end up as a mere flag-waving show. The space surrounding the Earth is now becoming a junkyard with defunct satellites and metal debris posing a threat to newly launched space vehicles.

Barack Obama’s caveat needs to be discussed at a global level in the backdrop of the failure to manage outer space as a commons. ‘Cosmonaut Rakesh Sharma, the first Indian to make a trip to space said in a recent interview, “Let us not build hell on far-off planet”.

C.P. Rajendran is an adjunct professor at the National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bengaluru.  

As Space Security Scares Mount, India Works on Military Space Capabilities

India is taking steps towards its defence space efforts through the Defence Space Agency, which was formed in 2019 to create a tri-service integrated Aerospace Command led by the Indian Air Force.

New Delhi: Recent US intelligence suggesting Russia may be proposing to locate a nuclear weapon in space to target satellites, resulted in panic not just in the US, but the rest of the world, not geared to counter the new threat. The reality of China with colossal budgets, being far ahead in the race, is bringing attention to India’s steps towards its defence space efforts led by the Defence Space Agency (DSA) formed in 2019 to create a tri-service integrated Aerospace Command led by the Indian Air Force.

Serious discussions on the strategy and blueprint of the much-needed command are underway. Being a complex technological challenge, the Aerospace Command will become fully operational in a decade or more. Not having a command does not imply India has no defence space assets or no activity in progress.

There is no cause for concern, (Retd) Air Vice Marshal D.V. Khot, former Director General DSA, told The Wire. “This is not a sudden activity kicking off. It is more of a rolling evolution of capability.”

“The defence space command will be a nodal agency in a wholesome fashion that will look after the requirements of space for the military. It will be an upgradation of DSA. Our mandate is to upscale capabilities,” he added.

“Space being space requires a gestation period and budgets,” he explained. The road is complex as next-gen technology upgrade needs of the military for Command, Control, Positioning Navigation and Timing System, Communications, Intelligence, Information, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance will change along the way. “It is better to have some information than no information at all,” a military space-related official said.

The Aerospace Command is likely to pick up learnings from the US Space Command that has been morphed according to changing requirements of world events. It recently released its updated strategic vision affirming the need to “ensure a safe, secure, and sustainable domain amid increasing threats”. “By 2027, USSPACECOM (will) enable Joint Force lethality …. protecting it from space-enabled attack.”

As space gets crowded, the risk of collision among satellites and debris increases. India, like many other nations, may also have to deal with hostile counterspace attacks.

“We want more (money)” is the constant refrain of those involved. Recently, Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan announced at the DefSat conference held in New Delhi: “Indian armed forces have earmarked funds of Rs 25,000 crore to meet defence space requirements, ranging from building a constellation of surveillance satellites to secure communications networks.”

Chauhan welcomed the participation of the private sector to help fasten the process of launching and constructing defence satellites. While this is a generous start, it is a tedious journey as the military moves towards a fully operationalised Aerospace Command. The Space Policy 2023, for instance, will need to be enacted as an act for the private sector to participate and invest in space-based applications and services in defence.

A beginning has been made. Tata Advanced Systems Ltd (TASL) and US-based Satellogic will collaborate on the development of a new satellite design and work together to integrate multiple payloads on a single satellite that will generate a diverse range of data over India – the first of which is planned to be launched as TSAT-1A, according to a joint statement. “The focus will be on manufacturing satellites and developing imagery in India for national defence and commercial applications,” it added.

The emergent need is apparent. China has at least 140 military satellites and a space program that is miles ahead, having conducted an Anti-satellite weapon (ASAT) test 12 years before India did in March 2019. According to NBC News, the most worrisome development has been China’s advances in hypersonic manoeuvre missiles. Launched from a rocket, hypersonic missiles pose a risk to satellites, fly at least 20 times the speed of sound, can circle the Earth and strike a target while evading most ground-based air defences.

India has around 15 military-application satellites but only two dedicated ones. The Indian Navy GSAT-7R, an Indian Navy communications satellite, delayed by two years already, is expected to be launched later in the year to replace the aged GSAT-7, called Rukmini that gives the Navy real time communication link between its land stations, surface ships, submarines, and aircraft. GSAT-7A (Angry Bird) is used by the Air Force. GSAT 7B, first in the five-tonne category, for advanced communication needs of the army cleared last year for acquisition to be developed by ISRO, has yet to take off.

Price Waterhouse Coopers in a recent report reiterated: “India has made good progress in the space domain…… with good capabilities in civilian satellite applications. However, due to the changing nature of space use and a concerted move towards non-kinetic warfare, there is a need to increase focus on the military applications of space technologies.”

India has been slow to utilise space for military benefit as the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) through the decades insisted it was only a civil space organisation. This was due to US sanctions. It was only in 2016 that India became a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), a multilateral export control body with an informal political understanding to limit proliferation of missiles and missile technology. But the mindset of ISRO through time, remains till date.

Given the slow progress of military satellites being launched and the need for large volumes of nano satellites in low earth orbit that have a shorter shelf life and require faster replacement, the military has said it would like the private sector to enter the field. For this it has suggested a launch – on-demand – that would be overseen by the Aerospace Command, The Wire has learnt.

Only time will tell whether, and when, this fructifies.

Neelam Mathews is a defence reporter based in Delhi

This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.

 

A Young Boy’s Journey From Remote Rajasthan to Space Scientist at ISRO

From learning English and graduating from his bachelor’s programme to winning a Chevening scholarship, Nitish Shrimal has done it all. Now, he wants to make this knowledge accessible to those from humble backgrounds like his.

In an interview, Anna Szolucha, a distinguished researcher and faculty member at the Institute of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Jagiellonian University, speaks with Nitish Shrimal, a scientist at ISRO, about his career path and much more.

Throughout his academic and professional journey, Nitish encountered challenges that tested his resilience, from overcoming language barriers to adapting to unexpected career paths within ISRO. Yet, each obstacle served as a stepping stone, shaping his perspective on hard work and determination.

Attributing the success of Chandrayaan 3, he remarked that the event has instilled a sense of “we can do it” within ISRO and the nation.

Below are excerpts from a conversation between Szolucha and Shrimal, who is also a Chevening scholar. They have been lightly edited for style and clarity.

Anna Szolucha [AS]: Could you tell me how your passion for space exploration began? What sparked your interest?

Nitish Shrimal [NS]: I grew up in a village in a remote part of Rajasthan. My family didn’t have many resources and, even in 2007, electricity wasn’t always available. Recognising these challenges, I knew I had to step up to improve my family’s life. It was during my 10th grade that I read about renowned scientists like APJ Abdul Kalam, who later became the President of India, and Vikram Sarabhai, the father of the Indian space program. Their stories were deeply inspiring. Around the same time, I began reading about the Columbia accident and the tragic loss of Kalpana Chawla, further igniting my fascination with space. This eventually led me to learn about the formal paths to join space organisations like the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO).

However, I wasn’t sure if I could ever get into ISRO. Back then, it was considered as prestigious and competitive as NASA or the European Space Agency, with extremely challenging entrance exams. I diligently prepared for the IIT-JEE entrance exam. Unfortunately, I missed the qualifying mark by a single point. 

I had also applied to a college called the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, which was a new college at that time. It wasn’t as prestigious then, but it was the only college in India dedicated to space studies. I chose Aerospace Engineering and graduated in 2016.

However, when I was in college, I faced a challenge because my primary language was Hindi, which is mostly spoken in the northern part of India. But B.Tech and bachelor’s degrees in Engineering are usually taught in English, so I had to learn and interpret engineering concepts in English and that was a significant challenge. I overcame that challenge and am fluent in it now. That was a personal achievement for me at that time, being able to learn a foreign language and excel at it.

Then in my final year of the B.Tech program, I met Professor R.V. Ramanan, who became my mentor. He taught spaceflight mechanics and he was also a deputy project director in Chandrayaan-1, which was India’s first Moon mission. I was very fortunate to learn the subject from such an expert. He was very humble and interactive, and he made sure that everyone in the class understood the material. He wouldn’t move on to the next topic until even the student in the last row understood the problem and could solve it. I was very impressed with him so I requested him to be my supervisor and he agreed.

I did my first internship on Sun synchronous polar orbit design at ISTRAC Bangalore, which is a tracking station for ISRO. The project that I also did was under Professor Ramanan’s guidance and it was on Earth re-entry trajectory optimisation using angle of attack modulation for a shift in landing site. So, suppose a spacecraft has to land on a particular landing site, but due to some reason, it needs to land on a different site, right? What changes would the spacecraft need to make in orbit at entry conditions? This was a fascinating project, and it sparked my interest in orbital mechanics. I wanted to pursue my career in orbital mechanics. I was very passionate about it.

However, when it came to recruitment in ISRO, the centre is allocated randomly. So, I was allocated to the Liquid Propulsion System Centre, where all the work is about propulsion. I was a little disappointed at that time that I didn’t get the field I wanted to work in, but it was also a good time to reflect. As I started working, my interest in propulsion grew. I’ve been working in this area for about eight years now. This experience taught me that whatever happens in life, happens for a reason, and in the long run, it doesn’t matter whether you get the subject you were initially interested in or not. We always adapt. It’s human nature to always adapt, even though it takes time, and you only realise it later.

I started my journey as a propulsion engineer at ISRO in 2016. After five years, I was looking for a change and new career opportunities. That’s when I saw a post from one of my colleagues that said, “I can’t keep calm, I was chosen for Chevening!” That’s the motto of the Chevening scholarship, and it sparked my curiosity. I wanted to know more about it. When I found out that the Chevening scholarship was a fully funded scholarship for all Commonwealth country professionals, I decided to apply for it, and I got it! It was a lot of hard work. The application process is a year long, and if you’re not at your best at any stage, you won’t get it. If I hadn’t gotten it, I wouldn’t have been able to pursue a Master’s degree at the University of Surrey on my own financial resources, so this was a much-needed scholarship. Once I secured it, I was over the moon, and I told myself that I had to make the most of this one year.

I participated in all sorts of activities, including volunteering. I participated in many university activities and even received the Employability award because I spent over 100 hours in workshops and volunteering activities. I also enrolled in an additional module, the Global Graduate Award: Introduction to Sustainability. In addition to my courses, I volunteered for One Young World, which was held in Manchester that year. I wanted to make the most of this year because it was a hard-earned opportunity, and I wanted to excel in it. I also knew this incredible opportunity allowed me to travel. I came to the UK to immerse myself in the culture, particularly the space culture. I visited Glasgow and, towards the end of my stay, ventured into Europe, visiting Pisa and Milan before returning to re-join ISRO. After my return, I was awarded the opportunity to work on Chandrayaan 3.

AS: The Chevening scholarship application process coincided with recruitment for New Space India Limited (NSIL). You were offered a position at NSIL but declined, even before knowing the scholarship outcome. This suggests it held great importance. Why was traveling to the UK and gaining that experience so crucial for you?

NS: I saw the New Space India Limited (NSIL) interview as a practice run. My primary goal was Chevening. Success at NSIL would boost my confidence for Chevening. However, once I got an offer letter from NSIL Deputy Manager post, I became interested in NSIL’s mission to privatise India’s space sector. The position as a deputy manager, one of the organisation’s initial members, was very appealing. However, I had to decline as it wouldn’t allow further studies within the first four to five years, and pursuing studies was a strong personal desire.

While my background is in aerospace engineering, with five years of propulsion experience, I lacked a holistic understanding of spacecraft operations. Other subsystems like thermal, AGNC, AOCS and Spacecraft Structures remained unfamiliar. Acquiring this knowledge would be advantageous in the long run, especially for future leadership roles in ISRO, where understanding how all subsystems interact is crucial.

Thankfully, the one-year Master’s degree program allowed the organisation to grant me leave. While a two-year program, more common in India and other countries, would have been challenging to pursue, the one-year format aligned with my availability perfectly.

Additionally, I harboured personal interests. As a cricket enthusiast, the scholarship presented an opportunity to visit Lord’s, the Mecca of cricket, and participate in related activities. Visiting filming locations for the Harry Potter series and Game of Thrones brought me immense personal pleasure.

While I packed a lot into my trip, I never compromised my studies. In fact, I received the Cable & Wireless Award for Best Overall Performance in my cohort at the University of Surrey. Balancing it all required discipline and dedication but it was crucial to satisfy my cultural curiosity and experience this new world while still excelling in my studies. 

AS: You juggle a lot, balancing your current work at ISRO, your education and even a scholarship. Could you tell me about your concept of hard work? What role does it play in your life and how do you define it?

NS: In college, I came across the idea that with AI and other advancements, “smart hard work” would replace hard work as the key to success in the future. I embraced that notion and believed it for a while. However, joining ISRO made me realise that smart hard work can sometimes lead to skipping crucial steps in the process. You jump from point A to point B, but miss out on the valuable learning in between. True success, I’ve discovered, lies in embracing the “real hard work” that involves going through the entire process. This approach has yielded far more knowledge than shortcuts ever could. So, for me, hard work means fully engaging with the process, not finding ways to circumvent it.

AS: What motivates you in your current work as a space propulsion engineer? Who or what are you working for? What is your mission?

NS: While I enjoy my current position, I have a strong desire to share the knowledge I’ve gained. Coming from a humble background, I understand how unaware many people, especially in my village, are about space technology and its potential benefits for humanity. Just as I once struggled to navigate the path to ISRO, I see a gap in knowledge and accessibility that needs bridging. On a personal level, I try to connect with college students by offering career guidance, participating in podcasts and webinars (including some introductory sessions on rocket propulsion), and starting with basic principles like how a balloon flies, to spark curiosity in young minds.

During my search for a scholarship, I came across various options like the Chevening Fulbright and DAAD. Inspired to help others, I created a YouTube channel called ‘Your Scholar Guide’ to offer insights and guidance on scholarship opportunities. The channel received positive feedback and gained over 1,500 subscribers within six months.

One challenge I faced was obtaining an Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) certificate for studying in the UK. This certificate, required for certain courses with potential misuse of sensitive technology, delayed my progress due to processing time and restrictions on specific keywords. Originally applying for Space Engineering at the University of Surrey, I had to switch to Satellite Communication Engineering within a short timeframe. Convincing both the Chevening scholarship committee and the University of Surrey required additional effort.

It highlighted a common issue faced by international students seeking ATAS certificates, which often leads to delays and confusion. To address this, I created a video explaining the application process, which gained significant views. While currently inactive, I plan to resume this initiative once I have more time from my professional commitments.

AS: As an alumnus of both the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology and the Chevening scholarship program, you have access to some impressive alumni networks. Many in the Indian space industry have spoken about the crucial role these networks play in their careers. Could you share your experience and highlight their importance to you?

NS: Absolutely. Networking undeniably plays a major role in shaping career trajectories. In fact, my professional network began with Professor Ramanan, who generously provided crucial reference letters for my Chevening application. His support made a significant difference. He also connected me with Meg Bhatnagar, a senior alumnus with coding expertise, who helped me overcome a challenge with my Earth re-entry trajectory optimization problem.

Furthermore, within my first batch at IIST, Vasu, a senior I met during an interaction at Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, shared his experience as the first Chevening scholar there. He graciously explained the application process and guided me through it. This reinforced an important lesson: having someone available to answer questions and offer support makes reaching any goal, be it a scholarship, job or another aspiration, considerably smoother. It’s like having a lifeline in a challenging sea.

Mentorship is equally vital, regardless of career stage. Networking provided me with invaluable mentorship at various points in my journey: securing employment at ISRO, embarking on the Chevening scholarship, and now exploring opportunities in Europe with the support of Professor Andrea Lucca, my former supervisor at Surrey, who will be a referee for me based on his familiarity with my work. Essentially, networking offers continuous support and opens doors throughout your career.

Even currently, I actively engage with the CEO of Skyroot, India’s first private Space Company, demonstrating the ongoing benefits of networking.

AS: After graduating, you interned at ISRO. Reflecting on your first interactions there, what were your initial impressions of the organization?

NS: As a student, I perceived ISRO as heavily guarded, which is understandable for any institute of its kind. While you’re inside, you don’t feel it, but as an outsider, the security measures are evident. However, the people were friendly. During my bachelors internship, my guide at ISTRAC, Padma Dev Mishra, guided my friend and me throughout the project. He explained everything clearly and, being enthusiastic students, we completed the work that was supposed to take us six months in just a month. 

Years later, when I worked on the Chandrayaan 3 project and had to visit ISTRAC, the same centre for tracking propulsion performance of spacecraft, I met Mr. Mishra again. He had grown into a leadership position by then. Despite the seven-year gap, he recognised me and fondly recalled our collaboration. In fact, on the day Chandrayaan 3 landed on the Moon, I saw him commentating on the mission live on television. It was surreal to remember him as my guide and witness his professional journey. I captured a screenshot of him on TV and shared it on my WhatsApp status, highlighting how the person I once worked with was now a prominent figure in the mission. Such serendipitous connections bring little joys to life.

AS: You’ve likely encountered the American perspective on space as the “final frontier,” implying a need for conquest. Some contend this view is ethnocentric. Could you share your perspective on this metaphor and how you envision outer space?

NS: Unlike conquering, I see space exploration as a shared endeavour for the betterment of humanity. India’s space program has primarily focused on development and growth, providing crucial telecommunication infrastructure that has significantly boosted our education and IT sectors. Space activities also support disaster management, minimizing losses during cyclones, for example. These are valuable by-products of exploration.

From an Indian perspective, I believe in harmony and collective well-being. Space exploration should serve these values. Of course, understanding our place in the universe, searching for potential life elsewhere, and pursuing lunar and Martian missions are all important endeavours. However, I stand against a competitive space race.

AS: How do you envision India’s role in the international space sector? What are its strengths and how can it contribute more significantly?

NS: Recent surveys indicate that India’s contribution to the global space economy stands at merely 3%, highlighting our immense potential in this arena. Our young population, with 60-70% falling between 30 and 40 years old, represents a significant strength. However, proper guidance and a well-defined path are crucial. The success of Chandrayaan 3 has instilled a sense of “we can do it” within ISRO and the nation. While the Chandrayaan 2 setback raised doubts, Chandrayaan 3’s achievement has bolstered my personal confidence in ISRO’s capabilities as well. As an expert in my specific subsystem, witnessing such collective success strengthens my trust in the team. The ongoing lunar and Aditya missions further fuel our aspirations for space exploration.

India has the potential to be a leading force in space programs, as evidenced by the planned Chandrayaan 4 sample return mission. Additionally, the XPoSat mission, a collaborative effort between NASA and ISRO, launched on January 1, 2024, demonstrates our growing international partnerships.

AS: Your long-term ambition was to establish your own space company in India. Does this aspiration remain your ultimate goal?

NS: Absolutely, I still harbour that ambition, but my timeline has shifted. While two years ago I envisioned starting the company within six or seven years, I now believe that additional expertise and knowledge are key before embarking on this venture. My current goal is to gain further experience in the European or UK space sectors, potentially accompanied by a Master’s degree in business. I also have specific interests in demonstrating green propulsion technology and its potential role in spacecraft reusability. Establishing my own company remains a long-term objective, and although the timeframe has adjusted, the fundamental goal endures as my career path unfolds.

AS: What sparked your interest in green propulsion? What drives you to pursue this particular ambition?

NS: Earth’s resources are rapidly depleting. Conventional space and launch vehicle propellants like monomethyl hydrazine and N2O4 pose significant health and environmental risks. They’re carcinogenic, require extensive safety measures, and raise launch costs. My goal is to develop “green” propellants that are safer to handle, have no adverse health effects, and minimize environmental impact. Achieving these three goals would benefit people’s health, protect the environment, and potentially reduce costs.

AS: Some prominent ISRO leaders, like APJ Abdul Kalam, were known for their spiritual inclinations and philosophical views on space exploration. The current chairman has also been seen visiting temples before crucial launches. How do you view the relationship between spirituality and space exploration?

NS: I see them as distinct realms. One pertains to inner peace and mental well-being, the other to one’s professional domain. Good mental health can undoubtedly enhance performance in any profession, including space exploration. However, I believe they remain separate aspects. Inner peace can benefit various aspects of life, from personal relationships and finances to hobbies and networking. While someone might be spiritual and not interested in space, or vice versa, I don’t see an inherent connection between the two.

AS: Some perceive a contradiction between being a scientist and having spiritual beliefs in a higher power. You, however, view them as complementary. Is that accurate?

NS: Absolutely. They can be complementary, and managing them effectively is crucial. In trajectory design, we model potential errors caused by lunar gravity, solar perturbations, and atmospheric drag. However, for low-altitude targets, pinpointing these errors with absolute accuracy is impossible. There will always be some margin of error. In those instances, I believe in a higher power that minimizes these uncontrollable factors. While our current technology doesn’t offer a fully accurate model of Earth’s gravity, we do our job diligently, acknowledging that there’s a higher dimension at play that ultimately guides things towards the right outcome.

AS: To conclude, would you personally cherish the opportunity to travel to space, perhaps to the Moon or Mars?

NS: Absolutely! Witnessing astronauts perform spacewalks or journey to space stations always sparks wonder in me. The sheer thrill of observing Earth from outer space, appreciating its beauty and acknowledging it as our sole home in this vast universe, would be unparalleled. If possible, I wouldn’t limit myself to the Moon – both Mars and beyond beckon me.

 

UN Rights Experts Welcome Start of ICJ Genocide Hearings, Reiterate Call for Ceasefire

‘South Africa’s case has broader implications for all States – not only those that have ratified the Convention – as all are obligated both to refrain from committing genocide, and to prevent and punish it wherever it occurs.’

South Africa has taken Israel to the UN’s highest court and told the International Court of Justice that Israel was perpetrating genocide in Gaza, backing up its claim with instances of how top Israelis had spoken and how its army was acting in the Palestinian region.

While the proceedings have made news – as have their lack of airtime – UN human rights experts have welcomed the move. The full press release of this is produced below.

UN human rights experts* today welcomed the start of hearings before the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) of a case brought by South Africa concerning allegations that Israel is committing acts of genocide against the Palestinian people. The experts emphasized that any decision the Court reaches on provisional measures must be respected and implemented by the parties to the dispute, as required by the ICJ Statute.

South Africa on 29 December 2023 asked the ICJ to urgently issue provisional measures ordering Israel to immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza and to protect residents from acts of genocide, alleging breaches by Israel of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (the “Genocide Convention”). The Genocide Convention defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”. The hearings concerning the request for provisional measures will be held on 11 and 12 January at The Hague, in The Netherlands. South Africa’s filing also alleges that Israel is inciting genocide and has failed to prevent genocide.

“ICJ decisions are final, binding, and not subject to appeal. Adherence to any order the Court may make by the parties involved is imperative for protecting the rights of Palestinians and reinforcing the primacy of international law,” the experts said.

“We commend South Africa for bringing this case to the ICJ at a time when the rights of Palestinians in Gaza are being violated with impunity. We call on all States to cooperate with the Court as it interprets the Genocide Convention and to respect the role of the ICJ as an independent court of law.”

The experts also welcomed the statements of support by many States for South Africa’s action in bringing the case to the Court, as well as the principled stand taken by individuals and organizations worldwide that have expressed support for the submission of the case by South Africa.

The experts noted that this is not the first such case. In 2019, for example, The Gambia brought a case against Myanmar under the Genocide Convention to the ICJ, and asked for the Court to issue provisional measures calling for a halt to atrocities against the Rohingya people. The Court issued provisional measures in that case, which is still pending determination before the ICJ.

Both South Africa and Israel have ratified the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, as have 151 other States.

“South Africa’s case has broader implications for all States – not only those that have ratified the Convention – as all are obligated both to refrain from committing genocide, and to prevent and punish it wherever it occurs. All States must act together to prevent, halt, and punish genocide,” the experts said.

“The ICJ has in the past made clear that obligations under the Genocide Convention are of an erga omnes nature, meaning that any and all countries have a stake in preventing genocide wherever it is at risk of occurring. This plainly means that uninvolved countries have standing to bring a case like South Africa’s to the ICJ,” the experts explained.

In its application to the Court, South Africa cited numerous statements by UN Special Procedures mandate holders, including the experts’ repeated calls for international action to prevent genocide in Gaza. The mandate holders’ statements reference evidence of genocidal incitement by Israeli Government officials, including a stated intent to “destroy the Palestinian people under occupation”, and calls for a “second Nakba” in Gaza and the rest of the occupied Palestinian territory. These comments by Israeli officials have been made amidst the extensive use by Israel of powerful, often unguided weaponry in Gaza with inherently indiscriminate impacts, severe restrictions on the entry of lifesaving humanitarian aid, and attacks on health care services, all of which have resulted in a devastating death toll, including large numbers of women and children, the forcible transfer of more than half of Gaza’s population, and extensive destruction of life-sustaining infrastructure.

Recalling the alarming magnitude and intensity of the bombardments, the experts also reiterated their demand, issued in December 2023 along with other Special Procedure mandate holders, for an immediate ceasefire and a halt to displacement, domicide, and attacks on health infrastructure. The experts further called for immediate action to ensure the unimpeded delivery of desperately needed humanitarian aid to people in Gaza, especially for the sick or injured, persons with disabilities, older persons, pregnant women, and children.

*The experts: Ms. Margaret Satterthwaite, Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Ms. Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, Ms. Siobhán Mullally, Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and childrenTomoya Obokata, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences, Mr. Livingstone Sewanyana, Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, Mr. Ben Saul, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Ms. Farida Shaheed, Special Rapporteur on the right to education, Mr. Balakrishnan Rajagopal, Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, Ms Mary Lawlor, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Ms Tlaleng Mofokeng, Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, Ms Cecilia M. Bailliet, Independent Expert on human rights and international solidarity, Mr. Javaid Rehman, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mr. Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation, Ms Irene Khan, Special Rapporteur on the protection and promotion of freedom of opinion and expression, Mr. Jose Francisco Calí Tzay, Special Rapporteur on the rights of Indigenous Peoples., Mr. Surya Deva, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Development, Ms. Dorothy Estrada Tanck (Chair), Ms. Claudia Flores, Ms. Ivana Krstić, Ms. Haina Lu, and Ms. Laura Nyirinkindi, Working Group on discrimination against women and girls, Mr. Carlos Salazar Couto (Chair-Rapporteur), Ms. Sorcha MacLeod, Ms. Jovana Jezdimirovic Ranito, Mr. Chris M. A. Kwaja, Mr. Ravindran Daniel, Working Group on the use of mercenaries, Mr. Michael Fakhri, Special Rapporteur on the right to food, Ms Ashwini K.P. Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, Ms. Paula Gaviria Betancur, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons, Mr. Clément Nyaletsossi Voule, Special Rapporteur on the rights of freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, Ms. Reem Alsalem, Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, Ms. Claudia Mahler, Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, Mr. David Boyd, Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment; Ms. Mama Fatima Singhateh, Special Rapporteur on the sale, sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children.

The Experts are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent of any government or organisation and serve in their individual capacity.