Jaishankar Hedges on India’s Engagement with Pakistan Amid SCO Summit Invitation

Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed that India has received an invitation to attend the Heads of Government Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which is being hosted by Pakistan.
However, the MEA spokesperson indicated that no decision has been made yet regarding India’s participation.

New Delhi: Even as India confirmed that Pakistan has invited India for the heads of government meeting of SCO, external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Friday (August 30) hedged on whether India would like to continue the current level of engagement with the South Asian state.

Speaking at a book launch function on Friday, he said, “Rajiv [Sikri] suggests [in his book] that perhaps India is content to continue at the current level of relationship. Maybe yes, maybe no… We are not passive. And whether events take a positive or a negative direction, either way, we will react to it”.

He had prefaced his response on Pakistan by noting that the “era of uninterrupted dialogue with Pakistan is over”, adding that “Article 370 is done”.

Noting that the issue was the kind of “relationship can we possibly contemplate with Pakistan”, he referred to the assessment of the author, a former Indian foreign service officer, but didn’t endorse it nor reject it.

Later in the day, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed that India has received an invitation to attend the Heads of Government Summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which is being hosted by Pakistan.

However, the MEA spokesperson indicated that no decision has been made yet regarding India’s participation. “Yes, India has received the invitation for attending the Heads of Government Summit of SCO hosted by Pakistan. As and when we have an update, we will share it with you,” the spokesperson said.

Relations between India and Pakistan have been at a standstill, with no official high-level contacts for several years.

However, as both India and Pakistan are members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari visited Goa last year when India held the chairmanship of the SCO. The visit was marked by tension, culminating in a sharp exchange of words between Bilawal and Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar.

The SCO heads of state summit, however, was converted into a virtual event, thereby avoiding the need to invite Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif to India.

Traditionally, the Indian Prime Minister has always attended the SCO’s annual heads of state summit. In the past, India has been represented at the SCO heads of government summit by a senior minister or the vice president. For instance, when India hosted the SCO Council of Heads of Government (CHG) meeting in November 2020, it was chaired by Vice President Venkaiah Naidu.

Saudi-Pakistan Statement Calls for ‘Dialogue’ Between New Delhi, Islamabad, Silent on Terrorism

The joint statement, which mentions India and Kashmir, was issued during the visit of Pakistan prime minister Shahbaz Sharif. This was Sharif’s first foreign trip after becoming the prime minister following the controversial general elections.

New Delhi: Saudi Arabia and Pakistan on Monday, April 8, jointly endorsed a call for “dialogue” between New Delhi and Islamabad to resolve the strained ties, as well as the Kashmir dispute.

India’s stance on talks with Pakistan is that it is willing to restart dialogue with Pakistan, only after cross-border terrorism ends.

The joint statement, which mentions India and Kashmir, was issued during the visit of Pakistan prime minister Shahbaz Sharif. This was Sharif’s first foreign trip after becoming the prime minister following the controversial general elections.

“The two sides stressed the importance of dialogue between Pakistan and India to resolve the outstanding issues between the two countries, especially the Jammu and Kashmir dispute to ensure peace and stability in the region,” said the Saudi-Pakistan joint statement.

India has always asserted that it will only hold restart talks with Pakistan in a “terror-free” atmosphere. This position was reinforced by Indian external affairs minister S Jaishankar who said last year that “Victims of terrorism do not sit together with perpetrators of terrorism to discuss terrorism”.

The joint statement released by Saudi Arabia and Pakistan notably omits any reference to addressing terrorism, particularly concerning efforts to resume talks with India.

In contrast, the India-Saudi Arabia joint statement, issued during the visit of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, had no mention of Kashmir or Pakistan. Rather, it had a substantive paragraph on countering terrorism, “in all its forms”.

According to India’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Talmiz Ahmad, Saudi Arabia had started to treat Kashmir as a bilateral dispute from 2001, during the visit of then external affairs Jaswant Singh to Riyadh. However, it took the 26/11 Mumbai attacks for Saudi Arabia to begin reaching out to India for cooperation in counter-terrorism.

Pakistan’s National Assembly Adopts Bill to Curtail Powers of Chief Justice

The Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, presented by federal minister for law and justice Azam Nazeer Tarar, was passed hours after the Standing Committee on Law and Justice approved the cabinet’s proposed amendments.

New Delhi: Pakistan’s National Assembly on Wednesday, March 29, adopted a bill aimed at curtailing the discretionary powers of the chief justice, a day after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said that “history would not forgive us” if parliament did not enact laws to curtail the powers of the country’s top judge.

The Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, presented by federal minister for law and justice Azam Nazeer Tarar, was passed hours after the Standing Committee on Law and Justice approved the cabinet’s proposed amendments, Dawn reported.

These developments occurred in light of two Supreme Court judges questioning the suo motu powers of the country’s top judge.

The bill will now be presented in the Senate on Thursday, March 30 (tomorrow), The News International reported.

Sharif addressed the joint session of parliament earlier on the dissenting judgment by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail of the apex court. They had vehemently spoken against the unlimited authority of the chief justice to take suo motu (on its own) action on any issue and constitute benches of choice to hear different cases.

Their judgment focused on the case of suo motu notice taken by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial on February 22 about elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces. The suo motu power is based on the original jurisdiction of the court under Article 184 of Pakistan’s Constitution. However, its usage over the years has created an impression of partiality on the Chief Justices’ part.

Additionally, Justices Shah and Mandokhail rejected the 3-2 judgment in the suo motu case, saying that it was a 4-3 judgment to reject the maintainability of the case. They also scorned the Chief Justice’s power to form a bench for important cases.

According to Tarar, the bill ensures that “every cause, appeal or matter before the Supreme Court shall be heard and disposed of by a bench constituted by the Committee comprising the Chief Justice of Pakistan and two senior-most judges, in order of seniority”. The decisions of such a committee shall be by the majority.

On suo motu powers, the draft states that any matter invoking exercise of original jurisdiction under Article 184 (3) shall be first placed before the committee of three senior-most judges. 

The legislation also allows appeals. “An appeal shall lie within thirty days from a final order of a bench of the Supreme Court who exercised jurisdiction under clause (3) of Article 184 of the Constitution to a larger bench of the Supreme Court and such appeal shall, for hearing, be fixed within a period not exceeding fourteen days,” according to the proposed bill.

All of this is taking shape as the top court is hearing the decision of the Election Commission of Pakistan to postpone the provincial election until October 8, which exceeds the 90 days deadline by the constitution to hold elections after the dissolution of an assembly.

Thus, some have argued that the coalition government under Prime Minister Sharif, which supports the ECP’s decision to delay the election in the two provinces until October 8, seems to be using parliament to curtail the powers of the Chief Justice.

Post-presentation, members demanded that the bill be sent to a committee to discuss it and report back before voting. As the law minister did not oppose the demand, the speaker announced sending the bill to a committee, anticipating a report soon. The proceedings were prorogued until Wednesday. 

This story, which was published on March 29 at 10:45 am, has been republished on the same date at 6:58 pm with an update on Pakistan’s National Assembly adopting a bill to curtail powers of the Chief Justice.

Watch | Sharif’s Talks Offer Serious But Poorly Phrased; J&K Biggest Hurdle to India’s Rise—Mushahid Hussain

“Kashmir is blocking India’s natural rise as an Asian country,” Hussain alleged.

The chairman of the Pakistan National Assembly’s Defence Committee, a former minister of information and broadcasting and a former minister of communications, has said Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s offer of “serious and sincere talks to resolve burning issues like Kashmir” is serious and reflects a nationwide feeling in Pakistan that there is a need for a change in the relationship between India and Pakistan. Senator Mushahid Hussain says this is why the Pakistani prime minister has “taken the initiative”.

However, asked what Sharif meant when in his interview to Al Arabiya he said “we have learnt our lesson”, Hussain said this was “poor choice of words” and re-interpreted his prime minister to be speaking not just about Pakistan but the sub-continent as a whole. As the senator (mistakenly but humorously) put it, his prime minister was using “the royal we”.

In an to The Wire, Hussain was asked whether a series of tweets issued by the Pakistan Prime Minister’s Office, after the interview was broadcast, asserting that the reversal of the revocation of Article 370 is a necessary condition for talks (“without India’s revocation of this step, negotiations are not possible”) effectively negated the earlier offer of talks because this condition would be unacceptable to the Modi government. Hussain first maintained that “wrongs can be corrected” adding that the revocation of Article 370 had “upset the regional applecart”.

However, when it was pointed out to Hussain that the reversal of the revocation of Article 370 would be impossible, because not only is the Modi government proud of the revocation but would be embarrassed to reverse it, but the government has repeatedly said that restoration of statehood will happen and it could be as soon as elections are held, possibly later this year, Hussain gave an answer which deliberately avoided saying restoration of statehood would not be sufficient for negotiations to start.

Hussain spoke at length about how, as he put it, “Kashmir is the biggest impediment to India’s rise”. Elaborating on this point, he said: “Kashmir is blocking India’s natural rise as an Asian country.” He argued that this is why Modi and his government should respond to Sharif’s offer of talks and remove the obstacle of Kashmir. As Hussain put it, once the Kashmir issue is resolved India could easily be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and a full member of Nuclear Suppliers Group.

Hussain clarified why in his Al Arabiya interview, Sharif had called upon Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan of the UAE to play a role bringing India-Pakistan “to the talking table”. He said the idea was to seek facilitation, not mediation. He made a point of clarifying that Pakistan was not looking for a role similar to that of the Abrahamic Accords. Instead, Hussain said Pakistan was hoping UAE could play a role similar to what it played in 2021, when the UAE facilitated the renewal of the 2003 ceasefire between India and Pakistan. This is something the UAE’s Ambassador in the US confirmed at the time.

Because the UAE is close to both India and Pakistan, Hussain said it can be “an honest broker”.

Finally, Hussain drew a distinction between Gen. Bajwa’s attitude to India and that of the new Army Chief, Gen. Munir. He said Gen. Bajwa was keen to improve trade relations without any corresponding movement in terms of Kashmir. Gen. Munir would link the two.

Hussain also clarified that reports by Pakistani journalists, Javed Chaudhry and Hamid Mir, apparently based upon a conversation with Gen. Bajwa (presumably after his retirement), that India and Pakistan had discussed on the back channel the idea of “freezing the Kashmir issue” for 20 years was not and could never be the official policy of any party or government in Pakistan. This could be Gen. Bajwa’s personal opinion after retirement. No serving Army Chief can hold this view, the senator said.

Pakistan PM Sharif Asks for Talks With India, Govt Later Adds ‘Only if 370 Action Revoked’

“My message to the Indian leadership and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is that let us sit down on the table and have serious and sincere talks to resolve our burning issues like Kashmir,” Shahbaz Sharif said.

New Delhi: The Pakistani prime minister, Shahbaz Sharif, on Monday (January 16) asked Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to hold serious talks about issues that remained unresolved between the two countries, including Kashmir. He also said that United Arab Emirates could play a diplomatic role in encouraging and mediating these talks.

Speaking to Al Arabiya news channel, Sharif said, “My message to the Indian leadership and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is that let us sit down on the table and have serious and sincere talks to resolve our burning issues like Kashmir. In Kashmir, flagrant human rights violations are taking place day in and day out.”

In Jammu and Kashmir, Sharif claimed, the reading down of Article 370 has led to a breakdown of the region’s autonomy. He also added that minorities are being persecuted in India, and this must stop if the country wants to prove to the world that it is serious about the issue, Dawn reported.

“It is up to us [India and Pakistan] to live peacefully and make progress or quarrel with each other, and waste time and resources. We have three wars with India and it only brought more misery, poverty and unemployment to the people. We have learnt our lesson and we want to live in peace provided we are able to resolve our genuine problems. We want to alleviate poverty, achieve prosperity, and provide education and health facilities and employment to our people and not waste our resources on bombs and ammunition, that is the message I want to give to PM Modi,” Sharif said.

“We are nuclear powers, armed to the teeth and if God forbid a war breaks out who will live to tell what happened,” he continued.

After the interview, however, the Pakistan Prime Minister’s Office issued a statement saying that while Sharif had consistently called for talks, his offer came with a rider. “…the [Pakistani] Prime Minister has repeatedly stated on record that talks can only take place after India had reversed its illegal action of August 5, 2019; without India’s revocation of this step, negotiations are not possible. The settlement of the Kashmir dispute must be in accordance with the UN resolutions and the aspirations of the people of Jammu & Kashmir,” the statement said.

India has not responded to Sharif’s remarks.

In an editorial on Wednesday, Hindustan Times noted that Sharif’s statements could be read as a “trial ballon”, to see how New Delhi responds. “Mr Sharif’s comments could be seen as a trial balloon to gauge the thinking in Delhi. While the Indian government has spoken of restoring Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood, it is unlikely the status of the region will be changed. Thus, if Mr Sharif were to cling to the plank of revoking the decision of August 2019, talks will be a non-starter. The window for any engagement too appears extremely narrow, with Pakistan set to hold elections this year and India in 2024. If a beginning is to be made, the two sides should focus on the resumption of trade and upgrading of diplomatic ties,” the newspaper said.

The Times of India too spoke of Sharif’s offer in its editorial, saying that the prime minister was trying to turn attention away from the many crises in Pakistan by focusing on Kashmir. “Sharif should concentrate on trying to fix Pakistan’s own, deepening problems rather than chase grand talks with New Delhi. Pakistan’s economy is a basket case. As of January 6, forex reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan plunged to $4.34 billion, just enough to cover three weeks of imports. Things have been further exacerbated by the devastating floods last year that drenched one-third of the country, displaced 8 million people, and dealt a body-blow to its agriculture sector. Meanwhile, inflation is forecast to stay between a whopping 21-23% with severe shortages of essentials like flour and fuel,” the ToI editorial says.

‘Pakistan PM Shebaz Sharif, Other Leaders Involved in Assassination Attempt’: Imran Khan

PTI leader Asad Umar told reporters that Khan believes that Prime Minister Sharif, interior minister Sanaullah and major general Faisal were behind the attack on his life and that he has called for their immediate ouster.

New Delhi: Following the failed “assassination attempt” on him, former Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan has alleged that three people, including current Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, were involved in the attack.

Khan’s allegations were shared by a senior leader of his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, Asad Umar, in a video statement late on Thursday. Apart from Sharif, Khan holds interior minister Rana Sanaullah and top ISI Genral Faisal Naseer responsible for the attack.

Khan was shot in the shin earlier on Thursday when his anti-government protest convoy came under attack in Allahwala Chowk in Wazirabad, a city in eastern Pakistan. 

Faisal Sultan, the former assistant to the prime minister on health, told media persons outside the Shaukat Khanum Hospital in Lahore that Khan’s condition was stable but that x-rays revealed bullet fragments in his leg and a “chip” on his shin bone.

Since being ousted in April this year through a parliamentary vote, Khan has been rallying the opposition around the country through such protests, demanding snap elections.

Also read: Pakistan: Led by Imran Khan, Hundreds Set Out on March to Islamabad to Demand Snap Elections

In a statement, the Punjab police said that seven people were injured in the attack and one killed. Others injured in the attack included senator Faisal Javed and PTI leader Ahmad Chattha. One suspect has been arrested in connection with the incident.

“Imran Khan called us and told us to convey this message to the nation on his behalf…He said that he believes three people – Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Interior Minister Sanaullah and Major General Faisal (Naseer) – were involved in the attack on him,” news agency PTI quoted Umar as saying.

He added that the former prime minister has sought for these three individuals to be immediately removed from their positions, warning of protests “across the country” if this is not done, according to Umar.

Further, Sheikh Rashid, former interior minister and Khan’s close aide, blamed the Shehbaz Sharif administration for allegedly hatching a conspiracy to kill the former premier.

“The federal government hatched a conspiracy to kill Imran Khan. Hired assassin Rana Sanaullah and the federal government has brought the country at the brink of civil war. It can’t stand before the sea of people as it has to go home,” Rashid said.

Sanaullah, however, rejected the allegations, saying the federal government was ready to provide every kind of support in the investigation.

Addressing a press conference, Sanaullah rejected the allegations made by Khan and said not only Prime Minister Sharif but also PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif and other leaders have condemned this attack and this kind of thinking.

He said that the federal government was ready to provide every kind of support for the investigation of this attack and also demanded that the Punjab government should set up a joint investigation team of senior officers to probe the incident.

Pakistan President Arif Alvi also condemned the attack, describing it as “shocking, alarming, disgraceful, deceitful & cowardly”.

Khan’s attacker was arrested by the police on Thursday and in a video statement, he said that he was trying to kill the former premier because he was “misleading the public”.

The suspect also noted that he only wanted to kill Khan and not any of the other PTI leaders.

However, Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, chief minister of Pakistan’s Punjab province, said police officers and other officials were suspended for leaking the suspected attacker’s confessional video statement.

Elahi directed the inspector general (IG) of the Punjab police to take disciplinary action against the police officers responsible and as such, the station house officer (SHO) of the concerned police station, as well as other officials, were suspended.

The chief minister said in a statement that all mobile phones of the police station’s staffers were confiscated and they will be sent for a forensic audit.

Elahi issued directives to hold an inquiry into the incident of the video leak of the suspected attacker. He directed IG, Punjab to begin a probe to ascertain the motives of the gun attack.

Widespread condemnation of attack

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has said that the attack on Khan must be unequivocally condemned. “All political parties have the right to hold peaceful assemblies and to expect security from the state when doing so,” it said in a statement.

The attack on Khan’s life was condemned by US secretary of state Anthony Blinken on Thursday, noting that “violence has no place in politics” and averring his commitment to a “democratic and peaceful Pakistan”.

“The United States strongly condemns the shooting of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan and others at a political rally. We wish Imran Khan and all others who were injured a quick and thorough recovery, and we offer our condolences to the family of the individual who was killed,” Blinken said.

The White House echoed Blinken’s sentiments, with press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre telling reporters aboard Air Force One, “The United States strongly condemns the attack on Imran Khan and his supporters and hopes for the swift recovery of all who were injured.”

“Violence has no place in politics. We call on all parties to remain peaceful and refrain from violence,” she said.

(With PTI inputs)

Pakistan: Ousted PM Imran Khan Seeks to Turn Provincial By-Elections Win Into a National Comeback

Running a super-charged campaign, Khan was able to turn what otherwise would have been a mundane provincial electoral affair into a referendum of sorts over his ouster from the high office.

Just over three months after his ouster through a no-confidence as Pakistan’s prime minister, Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) has scored a thumping victory in by-elections in the country’s most populous province, Punjab.

The coalition ruling at the centre and in Punjab was routed in 15 out of 20 provincial assembly seats that had fallen vacant after the courts – literally rewriting the constitution – disqualified the PTI members for defecting.

While the PTI was defending the seats it had either won originally or those in which the winning independent candidates had joined the party, the polls were widely seen as a political stress test for the Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who rules through a flimsy majority in the National Assembly (NA), and his son, Hamza Shehbaz Sharif, whose provincial government also hangs by a thread.

The ruling coalition is comprised of the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM), which includes Shehbaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and the smaller Baloch and Pashtun nationalist parties, and is supported by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). However, the by-polls were truly a face-off between the PTI and the PML-N in its traditional bastion. And as goes Punjab – with more than half the general seats in the NA – so goes the nation.

Running a super-charged campaign, Khan was able to turn what otherwise would have been a mundane provincial electoral affair into a referendum of sorts over his ouster from the high office. Proving pundits and his detractors – myself included – wrong, Khan instantly went on a dogged offensive after the no-confidence move against him, which also had a nod from the powerful Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Qamar Javed Bajwa, succeeded in April.

Khan detested that his former benefactor, General Bajwa, had decided to change the horses midstream when the traditionalists in the brass felt that their hybrid regime project had turned into an economic disaster. The PTI chief trained his political guns on the COAS, alluding to him and the generals siding with him as the present-day Mir Jafar and Mir Sadiq, the generals who had betrayed Siraj-ud-Daula and Tipu Sultan, respectively, and colluded with the British colonial armies.

He later denied it, but the point had gone across. Khan weaved a fanciful theory that the US had sought his ouster and commissioned these generals to do the hatchet job. He lied through his teeth but did it with a relentless consistency, and his followers bought it hook, line and sinker.

Khan castigated the judiciary which had, for once, adjudicated a case on merits and declared his and his partisan NA speaker’s action as unconstitutional and allowed the no-confidence vote against him to go through. He assailed – even after the by-polls win – the country’s Election Commission, which for the past several years has been hearing a foreign funding case against the PTI, an unfavourable decision in which could lead to severe censure.

Also read: Pakistan: Imran Khan Warns of Civil War if Elections Not Called

Fond of cricket analogies from his prime as a devastating pacer, Khan seemed to be tactically following a political version of the 1933 Bodyline Series, when the English fast bowlers had targeted the corpus of their Australian opponents, instead of stumps, with ruthless deliveries. Khan has made Shehbaz Sharif look almost irrelevant. He seemed to have rightly concluded that the incumbent Prime Minister was relying more on the goodwill of the army establishment to hold his coalition together than will of the people, and therefore, planned his offensive to undermine that support.

The PTI’s social media teams and common partisans have been consistently dragging General Bajwa over the coals. But what’s really incredible is that Khan and his followers have gotten away with all of that without as much as a rap on the knuckles. The more he attacked the military and judicial establishment, the more defensive they became.

Khan has known all along that the army’s thuggery is carefully calibrated; it hounds the weak, tolerates the strong and caves in to the powerful, especially if they are from the Punjab province. But in this instance, there is a lot more at play than meets the eye. Khan has powerful backers within the junta who weren’t terribly pleased with the traditionalists ditching him. 

This adventurist lot comprises of both true believers suffering a self-inflicted, modern-day caliphate-seeking complex, as well as opportunists like the former Director General Inter-Services Intelligence (DG ISI), Lieutenant General Faiz Hameed Chaudhry, who seeks to become the army chief when General Bajwa steps down this November.

The army quite literally became the prisoner of its own narrative. It has been peddling for decades that the conventional politicians are crooks who plunder Pakistan and stash the loot abroad, and only a charismatic and ostensibly honest and patriotic strongman like Khan could put an end to it.

The smearing of politicians and depoliticisation of the masses which had started under General Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq and went on in earnest during General Pervez Musharraf, had developed deep roots within the army. The officer class’s disdain for the politicians and, in fact, universal suffrage, is shared by the army families and also many middle-class civilians, including the judicial establishment.

General Bajwa’s decision to can Khan has been a hard sell within the army, and he faced criticism from the officers at several forums. He simply could not tell the officers and cadres that the potion they had been consistently fed is poison. The groundswell support that Khan enjoys within the army has made him virtually untouchable; against whom the top brass could not retaliate.

Pakistan Chief of Army Staff Qamar Javed Bajwa at a ceremony in Rawalpindi. Photo: Reuters.

Those of us who had forecasted that after his ouster, Khan would wail and flail but may not be able to mount a cohesive campaign, had counted on the Pakistan army acting in unison and general staff standing firmly behind the chief. But clearly, there are more moving parts than one had accounted for.

Also read: Here’s How Every Former Pakistan PM Was Shunted Out of Power

Pakistan army, historically being a highly disciplined outfit, has not tolerated insubordination in the past, but there’s clearly a hesitancy now to restrain the dissent within, lest the lid blows. While the serving generals are usually not heard from, many retired ones wear their love for Khan on their sleeve. One such man is the former DG ISI, Lieutenant General (R) Zaheer-ul-Islam, who not only actively campaigned for a PTI candidate in his home constituency, but also didn’t mince any words and described PTI for what it is – the army’s project to upend the PPP and PML-N politics.

The PML-N leadership has charged General Islam with orchestrating Khan’s 2014 dharna sit-in agitation to topple the then PM Nawaz Sharif’s government. 

In this go round though, Khan relied not just on the tacit support from the serving and retired officers, but played shrewd constituency-level politics as well. He picked candidates who have a strong personal/family vote bank, personally rallied his cadres, skillfully used the conventional and social media to drive his message home, and eventually mobilised the voters on the election day.

An almost 50% turnout in by-elections, where voters traditionally don’t exactly show up in droves, and the convincing victory margins, point to the robust electoral machine Khan had set in motion. He thrashed the incumbent government for skyrocketing inflation, especially food and oil prices, and a rupee plunging against the US dollar, eroding the purchasing power of the people. Never mind that it was Khan who, sensing his imminent ouster, had kept the gasoline prices artificially low by reneging a on commitment made to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), thus booby-trapping the incoming Shehbaz Sharif government.

Khan also tied Shehbaz Sharif to General Bajwa and the imaginary US conspiracy to oust him, thereby portraying him as a pawn of the Pakistani and international establishments. He was careful though to target only some generals by using euphemisms like “neutrals” and “Mr. X and Y”. Khan has carefully avoided criticising the near-complete control that army as an enterprise has exercised over the country’s politics, leaving himself with a lot of wiggle room to make up.

In fact, his whole campaign has been all about his own restoration as the army’s chosen man and to enable him to hound and destroy his political opponents on unproven allegations of corruption. The irony, however, is that his strategy and tactics seem to be working and his narrative, gelling together. 

Shehbaz Sharif, on the other hand, is clearly out of his political depth, as was suspected at the time of his inauguration. Unlike his elder brother, Nawaz Sharif, and his daughter, Maryam Nawaz Sharif, he is neither a crowd-puller in Punjab nor has any appeal as a national leader outside his home province.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Photo: Facebook

Shehbaz Sharif had built his brand as an able administrator and go-getter chief minister of Punjab. But he not only has nothing to show for his performance so early in his tenure, but also hasn’t spelled out any great plans for the future. If he thought that Khan would let him rule and deliver without throwing a wrench in the system at every chance he can, Shehbaz Sharif was mistaken. He seems to have miscalculated that Khan would unleash a political uncertainty that would make the already herculean task of economic recovery, nearly impossible.

Pakistan remains at the brink of an economic default and the rupee is in freefall despite the Shehbaz Sharif government securing a staff-level agreement with the IMF. One of the factors at play is the IMF seeking to ensure that Pakistan will be able to bridge a $4 billion funding gap by securing funds from Saudi Arabia. Saudis, on their part, had set strict conditions, including Pakistan securing and complying with an IMF deal.

Historically, the funding gap has been closed by securing funds from the UAE and China, in addition to Saudi Arabia but none of that now comes readily or on easy terms, thanks to political chaos in Pakistan. When a country is looking at finding $42 billion in a year for debt servicing and foreign exchange payments on oil, food essentials and medicine, delays in the IMF tranche and Saudi funding don’t exactly inspire confidence in the local markets or foreign investors. And this is a predicament that Shehbaz Sharif walked into knowingly.

His elder brother and three-time former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, was stone cold to the idea of ousting Khan through a vote of no-confidence and then cleaning up the economic mess left behind by him and his army benefactors. Shehbaz Sharif, on the other hand, was desperate and saw it as his only chance to get into the high office.

Nawaz Sharif and his daughter had also built, at great personal peril, a robust pro-democracy narrative, calling for the army to honour the people’s mandate and stay out of politics. But owing to the party and perhaps family dynamics, and against his better political judgement, the elder Sharif acquiesced. The net result so far has been that the PML-N has squandered most, if not all, of the political capital by hobnobbing with and relying on General Bajwa.

Also read: Is There a Pakistan Beyond the Hybrid Regime?

Shehbaz Sharif has virtually nothing to show for an economic recovery at the 100-day mark of his government and will likely have little in the near future. His government’s record on the resurgence of terrorism in Pashtun regions and the army’s dirty war in Balochistan remains abysmal and rightly drew flak from his allies from those areas, in a recent meeting. While he along with his main allies, the PPP and JUI, struck a defiant note and pledged to complete the term of the current NA, he is beholden to the army for keeping the coalition afloat through groups like the MQM. 

On the flip side, Khan has amassed a ton of political capital that he rightly intends to use in the contest for the Punjab government, slotted for July 22. The election for the chief minister of the largest province has already been tainted by allegations and counter-allegations of both sides trying to buy off members. If the coalition gets to retain the government in Lahore, it might get a few weeks reprieve. But in that case, Khan is likely to take the matter to the courts, where he has been already received a slew of favourable judgements.

If the PTI prevails, Imran Khan is likely to use the government there, along with his already stable dispensation in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province, to apply a pincer to the coalition’s neck in Islamabad to extract fresh general elections. He would not hesitate to mobilise the street in a replay of his previous long marches on the federal capital. But whether or not he actually gets his wish to have the snap polls depends a lot on what kind of assurances General Bajwa gets or gives.

The bad blood between the former benefactor-protégé is not exactly hidden anymore. The army, however, has stood even by the chiefs who exited the office in ignominy, like Generals Yahya Khan and Pervez Musharraf. Even the adventurists would have a difficult time letting General Bajwa be put on the chopping block before or after his tenure ends.

An unrelenting Khan, however, has merged his bogus national narrative into the local politics with great success and clearly intends to use the local victories thus secured to propel his national campaign. In general, energising the base and eliciting strong turnouts would be considered conducive to democracy. But imbued with a messiah complex, Khan seeks one-man rule for himself, where anyone and everyone disagreeing with him is ostracised.

When a narcissist politician is able to pull that off on a flawed and false premise, it actually bodes ill for pluralism and democratic values. Whether the PML-N is able to stymie the rising Imran Khan tide would depend on how and from where Nawaz Sharif plans to lead his party.

Shehbaz Sharif, no matter how able an administrator he may have been, is not cut out for national politics and is clearly no match for an opponent baying for political blood. For now, however, political chaos and economic turmoil is the name of the game in Pakistan. 

Mohammad Taqi is a Pakistani-American columnist. He tweets at @mazdaki.

Pakistan: Imran Khan Warns of Civil War if Elections Not Called

These comments were met with sharp criticism from Shehbaz Sharif, who asked the PTI chief not to “exceed the limits” defined by the law and constitution.

New Delhi: Ousted Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan on Wednesday admitted that his government was a “weak one” which was “blackmailed from everywhere” as the power was not with him and “everyone knows where that is”.

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman was ousted from power in April after losing a no-confidence vote in his leadership, which he alleged was part of a US-led conspiracy targeting him because of his independent foreign policy decisions on Russia, China and Afghanistan. He has been calling for fresh elections.

In an interview to Bol News on Wednesday, Khan said he is waiting for the Supreme Court to decide on his party’s plea to provide protection to protestors from his party, after which he said he would issue the date for the next march demanding general elections.

“We will see if they allow us to go towards elections through legal and constitutional means otherwise this country will go towards (a) civil war,” he warned.

These comments were met with sharp criticism from incumbent Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and other government representatives.

Khan was also asked to recall the events of the night of the no-confidence vote against him, who was issuing orders and who had impeded the cases against the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders.

Khan said his government had been “weak” when it came to power and had to seek coalition partners, adding that if the same situation were to arise again, he would opt for re-elections and seek a majority government or none at all.

“Our hands were tied. We were blackmailed from everywhere. Power wasn’t with us. Everyone knows where the power lies in Pakistan so we had to rely on them,” the 69-year-old cricketer-turned-politician said, without elaborating any further who he was referring to.

Khan, who came to power in 2018, reportedly with the backing of the military, is the only Pakistani prime minister to be ousted in a no-confidence vote in Parliament.

He said it was imperative for the country to have a “strong army” due to the threat posed by the enemies but said there was also the need to strike a “balance” between having a strong army and a strong government.

“We relied on them all the time. They did a lot of good things too but they didn’t do many things that should’ve been done. They have the power because they control institutions such as NAB (National Accountability Bureau), which wasn’t in our control,” he said.

The former prime minister said while his government had the responsibility, it did not have all the power and the authority.

The Pakistan Army, which has ruled the coup-prone country for more than half of its 73 plus years of existence, has hitherto wielded considerable power in the matters of security and foreign policy. However, the army has continuously denied its involvement in politics.

The PTI chief said the current political situation was a problem for the country as well as the establishment. “If the establishment doesn’t make the right decisions then I can assure in writing that (before everyone else) they and the army will be destroyed because of what will become of the country if it goes bankrupt,” he said.

“Pakistan is going towards a default. If that happens then which institution will be (the worst) hit? The army. After it is hit, what concession will be taken from us? Denuclearisation,” Khan said.

Khan said that if Pakistan were to lose its nuclear deterrent capability, it would be fragmented into three pieces. “If the right decisions aren’t made at this time then the country is going towards suicide,” he warned.

Prodded further to share his thoughts on the night of the no-confidence vote, Imran declined to go into details and said: “History never forgives anyone. Things come out. If you ask me, I won’t go into details, but when history will be written then it’ll be counted as such a night in which Pakistan and its institutions were damaged a lot.

“Those same institutions weakened Pakistan which gave it its foundation and strengthened it,” he said.

Khan warned that the country would descend into a civil war if fresh elections were not announced. He said there was “no question” of returning to the National Assembly as that would “mean accepting the conspiracy” that had removed his government.

The PTI chairman has been protesting ever since and calling for fresh elections because, in his words, the incumbent coalition government led by Shehbaz Sharif of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party was imported and not a true representative of the Pakistani people.

Khan led thousands of PTI supporters to Islamabad last Wednesday in a protest and had planned to stage a sit-in until new elections were announced but abruptly called off the sit-in at the last minute after making it to the capital. However, he had threatened to return after six days if the government failed to give a date for snap polls in the country.

Sharif bites back

Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif slammed Khan’s comments, accusing him of crossing limits.

According to Dawn newspaper, in a separate statement shared on the PML-N’s Twitter, Sharif said Khan’s remarks were proof that the PTI chief was “involved in a conspiracy, not politics”. He accused Khan of spreading “chaos” due to his “frustration and sick mentality”.

“This is not a statement but a conspiracy to spark the fire of anarchy and division in the country,” the statement says, according to the newspaper.

“Losing power does not mean that you wage a war against Pakistan, its unity and its institutions,” he said, warning Imran not to “attack” the federation and country’s institutions. “Don’t exceed the limits [defined] by the law and Constitution.”

The prime minister said the nation would not accept such “nefarious” plans at any cost and would not let them succeed. He vowed to defeat such “impure” aims.

(With PTI inputs)

Lahore HC Grants Bail to PML-N Leader Shahbaz Sharif in Two Corruption Cases

The court granted bail to him against furnishing two bail bonds worth Rs 50 lakh each.

Lahore: Pakistan’s opposition leader in parliament and Pakistani Muslim League (Nawaz) (PML-N) president Shahbaz Sharif walked out of jail on Friday after spending about eight months behind bars in two corruption cases filed against him by the country’s anti-graft body.

Shahbaz, the younger brother of three-time former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, was released from Lahore’s Kot Lakhpat jail on Friday afternoon, a day after a full bench of the Lahore high court granted bail to him against furnishing two bail bonds worth Rs 50 lakh each.

Many supporters of the PML-N had gathered outside the jail and showered the car of the 69-year-old former chief minister of Punjab province with rose petals and chanted slogans against Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Shahbaz was arrested in September 2020 in money laundering and assets beyond means cases by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) after a court here had rejected his bail application in the money laundering case.

The NAB had alleged that Shahbaz’s family had assets of around Rs 16.5 crore till 1990, which increased to over Rs 700 crore in 2018 that were disproportionate to his known sources of income.

Shahbaz’s counsel told the court since no investigation was pending against his client in these cases as the NAB had already filed a case against him, he should be granted bail.

Also read: For Indian Diplomats in Pakistan, The Run up to the 1971 War Was a Very Tense Time

Declaring Shahbaz’s release from jail ‘death of selected Prime Minister Imran Khan’s fake accountability narrative’, PML-N spokesperson Marriyum Aurangzeb said: “Lahore high court judges had not only stamped Shahbaz Sharif’s innocence but also exposed the malicious intent behind the government’s fictitious cases.”

She said the release of the opposition leader in the national assembly is the death of Khan’s “fake narrative” on corruption.

The court specifically asked NAB if it had any evidence or proof to back its allegations to prove that Shahbaz had in any way committed corruption in public money. But the government, like all other cases, had nothing to say.

It had nothing to say because Shahbaz had served not only the people of Punjab but of entire Pakistan religiously with devotion, diligence and transparency day in and day out. He had always taken his position as the chief minister as a sacred trust of the people of Pakistan, she said.

Aurangzeb said this bail in the assets beyond means case filed against Shahbaz was a blow to adviser to the premier Shehzad Akbar.

This bail is a medal of honour for Shahbaz Sharif and PML-N and is a resounding slap on Imran Khan’s face. The court had trashed all these allegations by the NAB-Niazi alliance purely on merit, she said, adding that Khan in his obsession to inflict damage on Shahbaz ended up damaging Pakistan at home and abroad.

Pakistan: Nawaz Sharif’s Brother, Nephew Indicted in Money Laundering Case

Shahbaz Sharif is Pakistan’s opposition leader and president of the PLM-N.

Lahore: Pakistan’s Opposition leader and PML-N President Shahbaz Sharif and his son Hamza were indicted in a money laundering case by an accountability court here on Wednesday.

The country’s anti-graft body, National Accountability Bureau (NAB), framed the charges against Shahbaz, who is the younger brother of deposed prime minister Nawaz Sharif, and Opposition leader in Punjab Assembly Hamza in the accountability court of Judge Jawadul Hasan.

Both the father and son have denied the charges and pleaded for innocence.

Shahbaz told the court that his political opponents, referring Prime Minister Imran Khan, had instituted false cases against him and his family members.

“I had saved only Rupees 81 billion from the Lahore metro train project and in 10 years as chief minister of Punjab I saved trillions of rupees in different development projects. If a single rupee corruption is proved against me even after my death, take me out of the grave and hang me, he said.

He said the NAB was being used for political engineering against the Opposition.

“NAB has yet to bring forth any evidence against me and my family members, Shahbaz said and informed the court that he had severe backache, but the jail authorities ignored this and brought him to the court in an armoured car.

“They enjoy giving me pain,” he said.

The court asked the NAB to produce prosecution witnesses in the next hearing on November 26. The NAB had arrested Shahbaz in the last week of September. He is lodged at the Kot Lakhpat jail in Lahore along with his son.

The NAB said that Shahbaz’s assets between 2008-2018 had grown multifold. It said Shahbaz could not explain to the NAB as to how he was able to buy four apartments in London and had not shared when his business had started and its income.

Shahbaz is a beneficiary of assets held in the name of his family members and benamidars (unknown persons) who had no sources to acquire such assets, it said.

“Shahbaz and his family members committed offences of corruption and corrupt practices as envisaged under the provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 and money laundering as delineated in the Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010,” the NAB said.

A total of 20 people have been named in the money laundering case. The main suspects are Shahbaz’s wife Nusrat, his sons Hamza and Suleman (absconder), and his daughters Rabia Imran and Javeria Ali.

According to the NAB, Shahbaz accumulated assets worth Rs 7,328 million in connivance with his co-accused family members, benamidars, front persons and close associates and developed an organised system of money laundering.

Shahbaz was arrested a few days after an alliance of 11 Opposition parties was formed to oust the “fake” government of Imran Khan.

Maryam Nawaz, daughter of Nawaz Sharif, had said Shahbaz was arrested only because he stood with his elder brother’s narrative.

Give respect to the ballot, she said, adding that there should be no interference of the Army in politics.

“If there were accountability and justice in this country, it’s not Shahbaz Sharif who would have been arrested but Lt Gen (R) Asim Bajwa and his family that made billions through corruption,” she said.

Nawaz, who has been in London for the last one year for his medical treatment recently launched a tirade against the Pakistan Army and ISI chiefs for ending his government and imposing “puppet” Imran Khan on the nation through a massively rigged 2018 polls.

(PTI)