US Launches Airstrikes Against Iran-Backed Militia in Iraq

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper has said that President Trump had given him the “authority to do what we need to do consistent with his guidance if that becomes the case.”


The US on Thursday launched airstrikes in Iraq on five weapons storage facilities connected to the Iran-backed Shia militia Kataib Hezbollah. The group is believed to be responsible for the attacks on the Taji military base in Iraq a day earlier, the Pentagon said.

“The United States conducted defensive precision strikes against Kataib Hezbollah facilities across Iraq,” the Pentagon said in a statement. “These weapons storage facilities include facilities that housed weapons used to target the US and coalition troops.”

Three personnel from the US-led coalition in the country were killed in the rocket attacks on Wednesday.

According to an Iraqi military statement, the strikes hit four different locations of the country’s paramilitary forces, police and army around 1:15 am local time.

Also read: Three to Tango: With the US Looming Large, India-Iran Ties Over the Years

The areas hit included Jurf al-Sakher, Al-Musayib, Najaf and Alexandria, where the paramilitary Popular Mobilization Units, as well as emergency regiments and commandos of the Iraqi army, are stationed.

An airstrike also hit an airport that was under construction in Karbala, an airport official told Reuters.

Earlier on Thursday, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said that President Donald Trump had given him the “authority to do what we need to do consistent with his guidance if that becomes the case.”

“The United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests, or our allies,” Esper said. “As we have demonstrated in recent months, we will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region.”

The article first appeared on DW. Read the original here.

Pentagon: 34 US Troops Suffered Brain Injuries in Iran’s Retaliatory Strike

The statement belies initial claims made by US President Trump that no Americans were hurt.


The Pentagon on Friday said 34 US troops suffered traumatic brain injuries during Iran’s missile strike on an airbase in Iraq earlier this month. President Donald Trump had initially claimed that no Americans were harmed.

Trump later revised his statement to say the injuries were “not very serious.”

Last week the US military said 11 military personnel had been treated for concussion symptoms after the attack on the Ain al-Asad airbase in western Iraq, before adding this week that additional troops had been moved out of the country for potential injuries. Eight of the injured arrived in the US on Friday from US installations in Germany.

The exact nature of the injuries, or the service and unit affiliations of the casualties, were not disclosed, though it was understood that half of the original 34 injured have returned to work.

Also read: Iran: Echoes of Iraqi WMD Claims as European-3 Line up Behind US Pressure Strategy

Seventeen remain under medical observation or receiving treatment.

Retaliation strike

Iran carried out the rocket attack on January 3 in retaliation for a US drone strike in Baghdad that killed Iran’s most powerful general, Qassem Soleimani.

Many US personnel were in bunkers before nearly a dozen Iranian missiles exploded. Tensions have since eased between the US and Iran after Trump said he chose not to retaliate.

The question of American casualties was considered important, as it was seen as influencing a US decision on whether to launch a counterattack.

The article was originally published on DWYou can read it here

Iran Not ‘Drawing Back’ Militarily After Saudi Attack, Says US Admiral

The Iran-aligned Houthi militant group in Yemen has claimed responsibility for the September 14 attack.

Washington: Iran has not drawn back to a less threatening military posture in the region following the September 14 attack on Saudi Arabia, the top US admiral in the Middle East told Reuters, suggesting persistent concern despite a lull in violence.

“I don’t believe that they’re drawing back at all,” Vice Admiral Jim Malloy, commander of the US Navy’s Bahrain-based Fifth Fleet, said in an interview.

The United States, Saudi Arabia, Britain, France and Germany have publicly blamed the attack on Iran, which denies involvement in the strike on the world’s biggest crude oil-processing facility. The Iran-aligned Houthi militant group in Yemen has claimed responsibility.

Malloy did not comment on any US intelligence guiding his assessment. But he acknowledged that he monitored Iranian activities closely, when asked if he had seen any concerning movements of Iranian missiles in recent weeks.

Malloy said that he regularly tracks Iranian cruise and ballistic missile movements – “whether they’re moving to storage, away from storage.” He also monitors whether Iran’s mine laying capabilities head to distribution sites or away from them.

“I get a briefing of movements on a daily basis and then assessments as to what that could mean,” he said.

Relations between the United States and Iran have deteriorated sharply since President Donald Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear accord last year and reimposed sanctions on its oil exports.

For months, Iranian officials issued veiled threats, saying that if Tehran was blocked from exporting oil, other countries would not be able to do so either.

However, Iran has denied any role in a series of attacks that have followed, including against tankers in the Gulf using limpet mines earlier this year.

“Deny It If You Can”

Asked what the latest attack in Saudi Arabia showed him, Malloy said, “From my perspective, it is a land-based version of what they did with the mines … quick, clandestine — deny it if you can.”

“Send a signal and harass and provoke,” he said.

His remarks came a week after the Pentagon announced it was sending four radar systems, a battery of Patriot missiles and about 200 support personnel to bolster Saudi defences – the latest in a series of US deployments to the region this year amid escalating tensions.

Still, the latest deployment was more limited than had been initially under consideration.

Also read: FATF Arm Finds ‘Critical Gaps’ in Pakistan’s Actions Against Terror Groups

Reuters has previously reported, for example, that the Pentagon eyed keeping an aircraft carrier in the Gulf region indefinitely, amid speculation that the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group will soon need to wind up its deployment.

Malloy declined to speculate about future carrier deployments. But he acknowledged the tremendous value of aircraft carriers — as well as the ships in the strike groups that accompany an aircraft carrier.

That includes the contribution of destroyers now accompanying the USS Abraham Lincoln to a U.S.-led, multinational maritime effort known as Operation Sentinel.

It is meant to deter Iranian attacks at sea – and expose them if they occur.

Shining a Flash-point

“What Sentinel seeks to do is shine a flashlight across that and make sure that if anything happens in the maritime, they will be exposed for that activity,” he said.

This includes by providing a surveillance and communication backbone to share intelligence with nations that have agreed to participate, which include Britain, Australia, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

“We’ve created essentially a zone defence,” he said.

Washington first proposed the effort in the Gulf in June after accusing Iran of attacking oil tankers around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime choke point. But the proposal was met with concern in some European capitals, already at odds with Washington over its withdrawal from the nuclear deal.

Malloy met Saudi Arabia’s naval commander on Sunday, assuring him of US support following the September 14th attack, which rattled global oil markets. He said US support included intelligence sharing. “We are constantly in the process of tightening that information flow with them,” Malloy said.

(Reuters)

Pentagon Seeks Sustained US Engagement With Sri Lanka

Despite the political upheaval, it is in the US’s interests to continue military collaboration and cooperation with Sri Lankan Forces.

Washington: Amid the increasing Chinese influence over the strategically important Indo-Pacific region, a top Pentagon commander has advocated a sustained US engagement with Sri Lanka, despite the political and ethnic turmoil in the island nation, posing a challenge to their ties.

“Sri Lanka remains a significant strategic opportunity in the Indian Ocean, and our military-to-military relationship continues to strengthen,” US Indo-Pacific Command chief Adm Philip S. Davidson told the Senate’s Armed Services Committee during a Congressional hearing.

“The political turmoil and ethnic tension between the Tamil and Sinhalese population, however, remain drivers of instability and potential obstacles to continued growth in our partnership”, he deposed.

Moreover, Sri Lanka has handed over the deep water port of Hambantota to China on a 99-year lease due to its mounting debts to China, which has caused international concern, he said.

Despite the political upheaval, it is in America’s interests to continue military collaboration and cooperation with Sri Lankan Forces, he added.

The United States Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM) cooperation with the Sri Lankan military centers on building capacity in maritime security and maritime domain awareness, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief as well as humanitarian de-mining, medical assistance, and peacekeeping operations, he said.

Increasing navy-to-navy engagement with Sri Lanka will be a USINDOPACOM focus in 2019, he added.

Davidson said the Sri Lankan navy is a well-trained and professional force with the potential to contribute to multi-lateral maritime interoperability in the Indian Ocean.

The recent transfer of an excess US coast guard cutter to Sri Lanka in August 2018, along with additional platforms from Japan and India, provide the Sri Lankan navy greater capabilities to contribute to regional maritime domain awareness initiatives, he said.

Going forward, it is necessary to sustain engagement with Sri Lanka, particularly the navy, and construct a multi-lateral approach to capacity building with like-minded partners to rapidly enhance the Sri Lankan navy’s capabilities, Davidson said.

According to the top Pentagon commander, Beijing is exploiting growing debt burdens to access strategic infrastructure in the region.

In December 2017, Sri Lanka handed over control of the newly-built Hambantota seaport to Beijing with a 99-year lease because Sri Lanka could no longer afford its debt payments to China, he added.