Bangladeshi Citizens Are Being Strangulated by the Digital Security Act

A person can be put away in prison on a completely baseless case. The accused will be jailed for several months, taking them out of circulation. This is how the DSA has been weaponised.

The smart young woman on the other side of the peephole called me ‘Shahidul Uncle’. Ours is somewhat of an open house, with my partner Rahnuma’s students, my students, and our activist friends, arriving and leaving at all hours. As burly men rushed in when I opened the door, I realised what was going on. My immediate strategy was to delay my abduction and to raise as much noise as I possibly could. That strategy is probably what saved my life.

I had been whisked away, blindfolded, and handcuffed. Had my family and friends, alerted by my screams, not immediately swung into action, informing local and international media, and setting up a vigil outside the place where I was being tortured, I might well have ended up like the many others who are ‘disappeared’ and ‘crossfired’ in Bangladesh on a regular basis.

Civil society had been campaigning for reforms to the Information and Communication Technology Act, 2006 (ICT Act), under which I had been arrested. But while I was in jail, rather than reforming the ICT Act, they had replaced it with the even more draconian Digital Security Act, 2018 (DSA).

Surprisingly, those implying that the Bangladeshi prime minister is “a woman who, according to the customs and manners of the country, ought not to be compelled to appear in public, or where such person is under the age of 18 years or is an idiot or lunatic, or is from sickness or infirmity” are mostly ruling party politicians seeking to curry favour with their leader. Section 29 of the DSA, governed by Bangladesh’s Code of Criminal Procedure, says that “no court shall take cognisance of an offence unless the complaint is filed by the defamed person”, except in such cases.

Overzealous party faithful have filed numerous defamation cases on behalf of the prime minister and benefitted from such acts of fealty. The courts have played ball, and the accused have been promptly jailed, sometimes tortured. Many have spent months in jail, without charges ever having been framed. Some have lost their lives.

The party faithful have also been quick to file defamation cases for each other, with the DSA as the weapon of choice. Those arrested include Mohammad Emon, a 14-year-old high school student, accused of having shared a Facebook post; Abu Zaman, a farmer who can neither read nor write, let alone use the Internet, accused of having defamed on Facebook; and writer Mushtaq Ahmed, who died in prison after being held for more than 10 months without trial. Cartoonist Kabir Kishore Ahmed, who like Mushtaq had been denied bail six times, was released on bail a week after Mushtaq died. He is currently being treated for what he says are torture-related injuries. Kishore maintains Mushtaq had electric shocks applied to his genitals. Mushtaq’s father passed away months after burying his son.

Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina arrives to address the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 27, 2018. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo

Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Photo: Reuters/Eduardo Munoz

Denial is the government’s default response. Then comes a series of unrelated new cases that keeps the accused and its defence team busy, while the government comes up with other diversionary tactics. Photojournalist Shafiqul Islam Kajol reportedly had knowledge of a sex scandal where ruling party members were implicated. He ‘disappeared’. The government publicly denied all knowledge of his whereabouts. He was ‘discovered’ 53 days later, 100 yards from the Indian border, where many disappeared people regularly ‘reappear’. He was held in pre-trial detention for seven months. His bail was denied at least 13 times before being granted.

Also read: Arrest of a 15-Year-Old under UAPA in J&K Shows the Govt’s Insecurity

It was touted as a law enacted to protect the people. But rather than protecting people in imminent danger with the arrest resulting in the population being protected, almost all the cases were about protecting ruling party politicians or people close to them. Journalists were arrested for having reported on government corruption. Cartoonists arrested for pointing out the nexus between corrupt businesspeople and lawmakers. Businesspeople arrested for commenting on unpopular visiting state guests. A student arrested for sharing a popular post, which questioned the prime minister’s motives. A Sufi singer arrested for veering from religious dogma. A labour leader arrested for campaigning for workers’ rights.

Laws need to be precise and specific. The DSA is quite the opposite. A vague rambling catch-all law, open to all sorts of interpretation, gives the police virtually unlimited powers to arrest people without a warrant on suspicion they might be intending to commit a crime. No evidence needed.

There is a motive behind assuming police have telepathic powers. A person can be put away in prison on a completely baseless case. The accused will be jailed for several months, taking them out of circulation. This is the perfect strategy prior to an election, or a business contract being signed, or some crucial deal being made. This is how the DSA has been weaponised.

Also read: It’s Time for the Government to Redeem Itself and Repeal the UAPA

The criminalisation of what would normally be a civil offence allows the law to be used to entrap people into accepting an offer ‘they cannot refuse’. The criminalisation of legitimate forms of expression goes against the core principles of the constitution of Bangladesh and the recommendations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Bangladesh is a party. It goes against the core aspirations of the war of liberation and the directives of the father of the nation that the DSA purports to protect.

Freedom is the oxygen that democracy breathes. A police force turned into a private army, a rubber-stamp judiciary, a rent-seeking bureaucracy and a pet election commission foretell a death by strangulation. A blatantly rigged election is the final nail in the coffin. A nation born out of genocide and rape camps, of poets and thinkers and farmers turned freedom fighters. Of brave women and men who fought and died for the love of a free nation, surely deserve better.

I hope the DSA is not applied to the party members for their aspersions on the prime minister.

Shahidul Alam is a Bangladeshi photojournalist, teacher and social activist. 

Shahidul Alam Granted Bail After 102 Days in Custody, Countless Petitions

A vocal critic of the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh, the 63-year-old photojournalist had been arrested on August 5.

New Delhi: A court in Bangladesh has granted bail to 63-year-old Shahidul Alam, the award-winning photojournalist, teacher and activist  who was arrested on suspicion of spreading “propaganda and false information” during widespread student protests, in a case widely seen as a test for freedom of speech ahead of a general election next month.

“The high court granted his permanent bail considering his age and the time he spent behind bars,” the the Daily Star reported.

According to the Dhaka Tribune, “A bench of Justice Sheikh Abdul Awal and Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty passed the order on Thursday. Deputy attorney general Bashir Ullah appeared for the state while Sara Hossain and Jyotirmoy Barua appeared for Shahidul Alam during the court session.”

There is no legal bar for Shahidul to get released from jail following the high court verdict, Barua told the Daily Star.

Also read: ‘The Tide Will Turn’: Read Arundhati Roy’s Letter to Jailed Bangladeshi Photographer Shahidul Alam

“We’re delighted that ultimately the court has granted him bail,” Hossain said, adding she expected her client to be out soon.

The government’s top lawyer said it would appeal the high court decision. “We will soon appeal to the Supreme Court against this bail decision,” attorney general Mahbubey Alam said, adding Shahidul Alam had lowered the government’s image through his propaganda.

Also read: Why the Bangladesh Government Is Scared of Shahidul Alam

Alam was picked up from his home by plainclothes policemen without a warrant, hours after conducting two Facebook Live sessions and giving an interview to television channel Al Jazeera, in which he accused the government of extrajudicial killings and corruption – accusations the government dismissed.

(With inputs from Reuters)

On Day 100, 34 Eminent South Asians Write to Bangladesh PM for Shahidul Alam’s Release

“His arrest and continued detention appear to be manifestation of an intolerant political atmosphere, an attempt to threaten and silence the voice of Bangladeshi citizens.”

New Delhi: Exactly one hundred days ago on August 5, internationally recognised and award-winning photojournalist, teacher and activist Shahidul Alam was picked up from his home in Dhaka by plainclothes policemen without a warrant, just hours after he went live on Facebook to describe the student protests in the city and how he was attacked by members of the ruling party while covering a demonstration.

A vocal critic of the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh, Alam has been in custody since despite many pleas from across the world to have him released. In the latest petition to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, 34 eminent South Asians have written to her, demanding that he be released.

Also read: Why the Bangladesh Government Is Scared of Shahidul Alam

The signatories, who include Arundhati Roy, Aparna Sen, Romila Thapar, Amitav Ghosh, Ramachandra Guha, Vrinda Grover, Vikram Seth and Raghu Rai, said: “It is clear to us that the case of Shahidul Alam is being used as a means to suppress criticism by others in civil society. His arrest and continued detention appear to be manifestation of an intolerant political atmosphere, an attempt to threaten and silence the voice of Bangladeshi citizens.”

The letter notes: “Shahidul Alam is a Bangladeshi citizen, but the rest of us in South Asia are also proud to call him our own, for the values of truth, justice and social equality he promotes.”

Accused of violating section 57 of Bangladesh’s Information and Communication Technology Act and ‘hurting the image of the nation’, Alam has been denied bail five times. Just a week after being arrested, The Wire carried a note written by his partner Rahnuma Ahmed which spoke of how Alam, when produced before the magistrate, told of how he had been tortured in custody.

Also read: Petition Demanding Release of Dr. Shahidul Alam Signed by Global Group of Intellectuals

“He was unable to walk by himself when he appeared in court in August, and he told friends that he had been beaten up by the authorities,” Amnesty had reported.

“As believers in the rule of law, we are shocked to learn that government lawyers continue to oppose Shahidul Alam’s release on bail using various stratagems and delays intended to deprive him of his fundamental rights to liberty and due process,” the letter reads. 

§

The full text of the letter has been reproduced below:

Subject: Appeal for release of Shahidul Alam on 100th day in custody

Your Excellency:

As well-wishers of Bangladesh and supporters of its 166 million citizens’ struggle for dignity, social justice and prosperity, we are distressed by the continued imprisonment of photographer and cultural activist Shahidul Alam.

Since the founding of the nation in 1971, the people of Bangladesh have led by example, fighting poverty, ending social injustices and being standard-bearers of participatory development. This advance has been made possible by the democratic spirit of the people, who have challenged military rulers and autocrats alike. As well-wishers of Bangladesh, we fear that these gains are in danger due to the rising political intolerance and denial of fundamental freedoms.

Shahidul Alam is a Bangladeshi citizen, but the rest of us in South Asia are also proud to call him our own, for the values of truth, justice and social equality he promotes. His work and activism are respected all over our region and beyond, with innumerable friends who admire his concern for the voiceless and marginalised. One example is his latest work highlighting the tragedy of the Rohingya people, who have been given refuge in Bangladesh by your Government.

Since Shahidul Alam was forcefully taken from his home on the 5th of August, he was remanded first in Detective Branch custody for seven days and, then held at Dhaka Central Jail at Keraniganj. He is accused of ‘hurting the image of the nation’ while reporting on protests by young students demanding road safety.

It is clear to us that the case of Shahidul Alam is being used as a means to suppress criticism by others in civil society. His arrest and continued detention appear to be manifestation of an intolerant political atmosphere, an attempt to threaten and silence the voice of Bangladeshi citizens. With the country preparing for general elections, this is a time when there should be more space for debate and discussion, not less.

As believers in the rule of law, we are shocked to learn that government lawyers continue to oppose Shahidul Alam’s release on bail using various stratagems and delays intended to deprive him of his fundamental rights to liberty and due process. Across South Asia, politicians and citizens have fought for the right to speak, and to write, and it is astonishing to us that a government today, especially one which seeks to harness technology for progress, should choose to use a law to proscribe online speech to jail a citizen.

Prime Minister, we the undersigned urge you to ensure the release of Shahidul Alam on this, the 100th  day of his detention. We look forward to Bangladesh retaining its place as an exemplar of participatory democracy in South Asia.

Sincerely,

1.   Akram Khan, London

2.   Amar Kanwar, New Delhi

3.   Amitav Ghosh, Goa

4.   Anish Kapoor, London

5.   Aparna Sen, Kolkata

6.   Arundhati Roy, New Delhi

7.   Ashok Vajpeyi, New Delhi

8.   Buddhadeb Dasgupta, Kolkata

9.   Dayanita Singh, New Delhi

10. Ina Puri, Kolkata

11. Jayadeva Uyangoda, Colombo

12. Kanak Mani Dixit, Kathmandu

13. Laila Tyabji, New Delhi;

14. Manjushree Thapa, Toronto

15. Mohammed Hanif, Karachi

16. Moushumi Bhowmik, Kolkata

17. Nandita Das, Kolkata

18. Nimalka Fernando, Colombo

19. Patricia Mukhim, Shillong

20. Pooja Sood, New Delhi

21. Rachana Singh, New Delhi

22. Raghu Rai, New Delhi

23. Rajdeep Sardesai, New Delhi

24. Ramchandra Guha, Bangalore

25. Romila Thapar, New Delhi

26. Salima Hashmi, Lahore

27. Sanjay Kak, New Delhi

28. Sanjoy Hazarika, Shillong

29. Sankha Ghosh, Kolkata

30. Shabana Azmi, Mumbai

31. Sushila Karki, Kathmandu

32. Vijay Prashad, New Delhi

33. Vikram Seth

34. Vrinda Grover, New Delhi

Note: An earlier version of the article said there are 33 signatories to the petition; Vikram Seth’s name was missing.

Petition Demanding Release of Dr. Shahidul Alam Signed by Global Group of Intellectuals

Alam’s arrest came in the wake of student protests in Bangladesh after a speeding bus killed two teenagers on July 29.

New Delhi: After the unceremonious arrest of prominent Bangladeshi photographer Dr. Shahidul Alam, triggered by an interview with Al Jazeera, a group of scholars and lawyers has released a petition demanding his immediate release. Alam was arrested on August 5, hours after the video went up. The next day, he was charged under Section 57 of Bangladesh’s Information Communications Technology Act, a comprehensive law against electronic communication that “tends to deprave or corrupt” the state.

Also Read: Bangladesh: Concerns Over Free Speech Continue With Opposition-Linked Lawyer’s Arrest

Alam’s arrest came in the wake of student protests in Bangladesh after a speeding bus killed two teenagers on July 29. Protestors took to the streets to demand road safety in a country where, according to Al Jazeera, over 7000 people are killed in traffic accidents each year. In the interview, Alam argued that the protests were fueled by “larger” factors than simply road safety. Among the issues he highlighted were  “the looting of the banks and the gaggling of the media”, “extrajudicial killings, disappearings, bribery and corruption”. Perhaps most contentiously, he discussed the declining credibility of PM Sheikh Hasina Wazed, an unacceptable criticism in the eyes of the government.

The petition addressed to PM Wazed is reprinted below.

§

To: Sheikh Hasina Wazed,

Hon’ble Prime Minister of Bangladesh

14, October 2018

PETITION DEMANDING RELEASE OF DR. SHAHIDUL ALAM

Madam Prime Minister,

We, the undersigned strongly condemn the detention of Dr. Shahidul Alam, Managing Director, Drik, since 5th August 2018. He was arrested after being interviewed on the Al-Jazeera English news channel, where he had criticized the Bangladeshi government’s response to student protests calling for safer roads after two students were killed and 13 others injured by a speeding bus while waiting at a bus stop. The student protests have been met by disproportionate police force, including the use of tear-gas and rubber bullets, resulting in more than two hundred students being injured.

Global protests on Dr. Alam’s incarceration continue unabated and have included statements made by 12 Nobel Laureates, many eminent citizens and journalists across the globe. We add our voices to theirs.

Dr. Alam has worked tirelessly for decades to promote the welfare of Bangladeshi citizens through his photography and journalism, and to bring national and international attention to their resilience in the face of adversity and oppression. His photographs echo the voices of the people. Dr. Alam’s continued detention is counter to the principles of democracy and freedom of opinion.

Continued detention of Dr. Alam is contrary to the foundational values of rule of law and fundamental rights embodied the Constitution of Bangladesh and its commitments under international law to uphold human rights, fundamental freedoms and civil liberties of its citizens. It is also gravely tarnishing Bangladesh’s image and reputation.

We call for the immediate release of Dr. Shahidul Alam and that all charges are dropped against him in this connection. We also condemn and call for a stop to all other human rights violations in Bangladesh including repression and/or arbitrary detention and to ensure freedom of expression, assembly and association for all.

Signatories:

1. Romila Thapar Professor Emerita, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. Romila.thapar@gmail.com

2. Mark Sidel Professor, Law and Public Affairs University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA mark.sidel@wisc.edu

3. Rajeev Dhavan Advocate, Supreme Court of India rdhavan@gmail.com

4. Osama Siddique Executive Director, Law and Policy Network, Pakistan. dr.osamasiddique@gmail.com

5. Mitra Sharafi Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law School, USA mitra.sharafi@wisc.edu

6. David Lewis Professor of Social Policy and Development, Department of Social Policy lewisd100@gmail.com

7. Ali Riaz Professor of Political Science, Illinois State University, USA ariaz@ilstu.edu

8. Maya Jasanoff Professor of History and Harvard College Professor Center for European Studies Harvard University, USA. mjasanof@fas.harvard.edu

9. Aziz Rana Professor of Law, Cornell Law School, USA

10. Cyra Choudhury Professor of Law, Florida International University Law School, USA choudhuq@fiu.edu

11. Rohit De Assistant Professor, Department of History, Yale University, USA rohit.de@yale.edu

12. Surabhi Chopra Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Chinese University of Hong Kong surabhic@cuhk.edu.hk

13. Chaumtoli Huq Associate Professor, CUNY Law School, USA

14. Prabhakar Singh Associate Professor of Law, Jindal Global Law School, India prabhakarsingh.adv@gmail.com

15. Usha Natarajan Usha Natarajan, Associate Professor, Department of Law and Associate Director of the Center for Migration and Refugee Studies, American University in Cairo, Egypt. unatarajan@aucegypt.edu

16. Narendra Subramanian Professor & Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Political Science, McGill University, Canada narendra.subramanian@mcgill.ca

17. Rituparna De Advocate, Calcutta High Court, India derituparna@yahoo.co.in

18. Sumudu Atapattu Director of UW Law School Research Centers, University of Wisconsin Law School, USA sumudu.atapattu@wisc.edu

19. Tariq Omar Ali Assistant Professor, History, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA toali@illinois.edu

20. Neeti Nair, Associate Professor of History, University of Virginia, Global Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center, 2018-20,USA nn2v@virginia.edu

21. Rachel Sturman, Associate Professor Department of History & Asian Studies Program, Bowdoin College, USA rsturman@bowdoin.edu

22. Amarta Ghose Advocate, Calcutta High Court, India. amarta_ghose@yahoo.co.in

23. Toby Goldbach Associate Professor, School of Law, University of British Columbia, Canada goldbach@allard.ubc.ca

24. Dina Siddiqi Clinical Associate Professor, Liberal Studies, New York University dms17@nyu.edu

25. Matthew Corrigan General Counsel, Australian Law Reform Commission, Australia Matt_corrigan@yahoo.com

26. Nusrat Chowdhury Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Amherst College, USA nchowdhury@amherst.edu

27. Shanthi Senthe Assistant Professor, University of Windsor Faculty of Law, Canada shanthisenthe@hotmail.com

28. Maryam Khan Institute of Development and Economic Alternatives (IDEAS), Pakistan Maryam.paro@gmail.com

29. Samiya Ahmed Selim Associate Professor and Director Center for Sustainable Development, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh samiya@gmail.com

30. Srimati Basu Professor of Gender and Women’s Studies and Anthropology, University of Kentucky, USA Srimati.basu@uky.edu

31. Shahnaz Rouse Professor, Sarah Lawrence College, USA srouse@sarahlawrence.edu

32. Sanele Sibanda Senior Lecturer, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Sanele.sibanda@gmail.com

33. Mostofa Haider Lecturer, Law, Curtin University, Australia Mhaider2@gmail.com

34. Cristina Blanco Sío-López Global Young Academy Cristina.Blanco.Sio-Lopez@EUI.eu

35. Dr Kalpouzos Lecturer in Law, City University, U.K. ioannis.kalpouzos.1@city.ac.uk

36. Mircea Raianu Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of Maryland, U.S.A. mraianu@umd.edu

37. Subho Basu Associate Professor, Department of History and Classical Studies, McGill University, Canada subho.basu@mcgill.ca

38. Rishad Choudhury Assistant Professor, History, Oberlin College, USA Rishad.Choudhury@oberlin.edu

39. Melissa Crouch Senior Lecturer, University of New South Wales, Australia melissa.crouch@unsw.edu.au

40. Daud Ali Associate Professor, South Asian Studies, University of Pennsylvania, USA. daudali@sas.upenn.edu

41. Svati Shah Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst svatipshah@wost.umass.edu

42. Auritro Majumder Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of Houston amajumder@uh.edu

43. Tania Saeed Assistant Professor, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan Tania.saeed@lums.edu.pk

44. Summaiya Zaidi Advocate, Sindh High Court, Pakistan Zaidi.summaiya@gmail.com

45. Nida Kirmani Associate Professor, Sociology, nidakirmani@gmail.com

School of Humanities and Social Sciences Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan.

46. Waqas Butt Assistant Professor, Anthropology, University of Toronto, Canada waqas.butt@utoronto.ca

47. Hana Shams Ahmed Graduate Student, York University, Canada Hana.s.ahmed@gmail.com

48. Utpal Sandesara Graduate Student, Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania utpals@mail.med.upenn.edu

49. Natasha Raheja Postdoctoral Associate, Cornell University, USA nraheja@cornell.edu

50. Max Stille Research Scientist, Max Planck Institute, Germany. stille@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

51. Saad Quasem Graduate Student, Anthropology, University of Virginia, USA sqsnw@virginia.edu

52. Mizanur Rahman Graduate Student, Political Science, University of Illinois State University, USA mrahman@ilstu.edu

53. Cynthia Farid Graduate Student, University of Wisconsin Law School, USA farid@wisc.e

As Part of Wider Crackdown, Bangladesh’s Sheikh Hasina Takes Aim at Photographer Shahidul Alam

Hasina, who was returned unopposed in 2014 after the opposition boycotted the poll, is seeking a third term in an election at the end of December against a backdrop of growing dissent at what critics believe is her increasingly authoritarian government.

New York/Dhaka: Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina says she is convinced that jailed photographer Shahidul Alam instigated trouble by spreading what she describes as “false news” about protests against her rule in August.

In an exclusive interview with Reuters, Hasina described Alam, who is known as one of South Asia’s preeminent photographers, as “mentally sick” and blamed his behaviour on his family background – Alam’s great uncle was on the opposing side to Hasina’s father in Bangladesh‘s war of independence from Pakistan.

She offered no evidence for her accusations, which Alam’s family and lawyer reject.

Alam was arrested in August, hours after criticizing the government’s response to widespread student protests.

His detention has been widely seen as a test for freedom of speech in the country and has sparked worldwide demands for his release.

Hasina, who was returned unopposed in 2014 after the opposition boycotted the poll, is seeking a third term in an election at the end of December against a backdrop of growing dissent at what critics believe is her increasingly authoritarian government.

“You are now guilty until proven innocent – we have a reverse system,” said Ataur Rahman, a professor of political science at Dhaka University. “People don’t want to be engaged in debates in case they end up like Shahidul.”

Told of Hasina’s comments, Alam’s family said the government had already decided on his guilt before a trial can be held. “It shows they have already made their judgment,” said Alam’s niece, Dilruba Karim. She added that Hasina’s comments “are hugely cruel and don’t befit the leader of a so-called democracy”.

Anisul Huq, a cabinet minister who handles legal affairs in Hasina’s government, said the country’s judicial system has “full independence and freedom”.

Also read: Bangladesh Enacts Digital Security Law in Its Latest Assault on Free Speech

Alam, a long-term critic of Hasina’s Awami League, is being investigated under a controversial section of the Information and Communication Technology Act, which Human Rights Watch says has been used by Hasina’s government in a number of arbitrary detentions of government critics and is one of several laws that have been used to stifle free speech.

The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists has called the case “rife with due process violations”, an accusation that Huq denied.

Alam’s lawyer, Shahdeen Malik, said his comments during the protests did not constitute a criminal offence, and that Hasina’s remarks regarding Alam’s uncle suggested a “feudal” justice system.

Hasina’s government has also introduced laws that prescribe jail time for those spreading “propaganda” against the country, while her main political rival, Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Khaleda Zia, is in jail on corruption charges she claims were part of a plot to prevent her from challenging Hasina.

The government firmly denies it has interfered with freedom of speech. “No government has safeguarded and upheld principles of freedom of expression, freedom of speech and freedom of press as much as this government of Hasina has done,” Huq said.

“Goons” wielding rods

Alam was detained for what the government says was misleading reporting on the demonstrations, that began because of the deaths of two school students in a traffic accident before escalating into the widest anti-government protests in years. Alam says he was covering the demonstrations as a photojournalist.

In one of a dozen Facebook videos he posted from the protest site, Alam said he had been attacked and had his camera smashed by “goons” wielding metal rods and sticks from the Chhatra League, a student movement affiliated with the ruling Awami League. He later posted a photograph he said showed men from the movement wearing masks and being allowed to disrupt the protests in full view of police officers.

Biplob Barua, a senior leader in the Awami League, said the allegations made by Alam in the Facebook videos about attacks on students and the failure of the police to act were “totally false” and had provoked additional violence.

Photographs of protesters being attacked by young men are widely available online but Reuters could not verify what group the assailants belonged to.

Alam was picked up hours after giving an interview to Al Jazeera in which he accused the government of involvement in extrajudicial killings in the past.

The government has denied allegations of sanctioning extrajudicial killings in its controversial anti-drugs campaign.

“Save the children”

Hasina said in the interview with Reuters in New York late last month that Alam had spread false news as authorities were trying to calm the students.

“He tried to use this situation, to instigate it,” she said. “We tried to save the children but he tried to use these children. All the false news he started… how can you accept it?”

In the interview, she also sharply criticised Alam’s deceased great uncle, Abdus Sabur Khan, a former government minister who opposed Bangladesh‘s independence and allied with Pakistan.

Also read: India Is Backing Sheikh Hasina’s Autocratic Govt for Own Interest: Ex Bangladesh Chief Justice

“He opposed our liberation war, he joined Pakistan, he didn’t accept Bangladesh. In 1971 he was with the Pakistani occupation army,” Hasina said. “Sometimes blood speaks, you understand that.”

The war for independence is still a sensitive topic in the country.

A new law, called the Digital Security Act, signed into law by the nation’s president on Monday despite protests from local journalists and the US, stipulates a maximum jail sentence of 14 years for several offences, including secretly recording inside government buildings and spreading “propaganda” against Bangladesh‘s 1971 war for independence.

Hasina told Reuters that reporters had nothing to fear from the Digital Security Act.

“If they have confidence that they will not do anything wrong then why should they worry,” she said.

(Reuters)