This move can lead to the entry of many manufacturers of bedaquiline, thereby reducing the exorbitant price which many governments currently find difficult to afford for all of their patients, say activists.
New Delhi: In what can be termed a huge development for drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) patients across large parts of the world, bedaquiline maker Johnson and Johnson said on September 30 (Saturday) that it would drop its patent over the drug in 134 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Bedaquiline is one of the most important components of the drug regimen prescribed for DR-TB patients. These are those patients on whom the first line of TB drugs fail to produce the desired result, and so they require an advanced level of treatment regimen.
Globally, there are 4,50,000 DR-TB patients, a vast majority of whom are in the LMICs, including India.
In a press release issued on September 30, the American drugmaker said, “The decision is intended to assure current and future generic manufacturers that they may manufacture and sell high quality generic versions of Sirturo [brand name of bedaquiline] without a concern that the Company will enforce its bedaquiline patents.”
This development comes after decades of public pressure and efforts of TB advocates who have been demanding that the company must give up its call for what is called a ‘secondary patent’ – or the extension of its primary patent. J&J’s patent over the base compound of the drug was set to expire in most countries in 2023. However, it had applied for a secondary patent to extend what the activists termed a ‘monopoly’ over the drug.
India’s patent office had rejected J&J’s application for a secondary patent in April 2023. This was hailed as a major victory as far as access to this key drug was concerned. India has the largest number of DR-TB patients across the world.
Recently, the South African Competition Commission had announced an ‘unprecedented’ investigation into exorbitant prices of bedaquiline that the country’s government had to pay to buy the drug for its patients.
Reacting to J&J’s move, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) said, “While India was saved from granting unmerited secondary patents [another patent after expiry of primary patent] due to provisions such as PreGrant Opposition filed by patients/ patient groups, this non enforcement [of patent] in all other countries will mean that Indian generic [makers] can now enter all these markets without the fear of litigation.”
The entry of more manufacturers would ensure competition, which may help in bringing down the prices of this very important drug in TB management, explained Ganesh Acharya, a Mumbai-based TB activist, to The Wire.
He added, “I expect the cost of the six-month course [180 tablets over 180 days per patient] to come down to $80, and [this] can come as a huge relief to the governments [who procure the drug for patients].” Till 2020, it was $400 for the six-month regimen for every patient, which the company kept further reducing over the period of time. However, it was still considered unaffordable for many governments.
In August this year, the drugmaker had entered a deal with ‘Stop TB Partnership’, a UN-hosted coalition of TB advocates, to reduce the price of its drug by half, and to sell the six-month course [per person] at the price of $130, to it.
The ‘Stop TB Partnership’, through its ‘Global Drug Facility (GDF)’, supplies DR-TB drugs to several countries, or fulfils a part of their requirements.
Two days ago, Unitaid, a WHO-hosted agency, wrote an open letter to J&J terming the company’s deal with ‘Stop TB partnership’ an “incomplete solution”. It demanded that the firm must drop its secondary patent.
“Unitaid is calling on J&J to remove secondary patents or provide a comprehensive license to generics and allow all countries to purchase bedaquiline at the negotiated rates, including those excluded from the agreement or not procuring through GDF,” it wrote.
Blessina Kumar of the Global Coalition of TB Activists sounded a more cautionary note. “The drug going off patent now is a big cause for celebration but we have to see that the results of this development don’t remain confined to paper but translate into actual relief for patients,” she told The Wire.
“There is a lot for the governments to do hereon,” she said, adding, “The governments will have to properly map their needs, give assistance to manufacturers, if necessary, and most importantly, work on their supply chains.”
She explained that supply chains were one of the most important parts of the pyramid, referring to India’s current crisis of stock-outs of DR-TB drugs. “Even if there are doses manufactured at affordable prices for the governments, if they are not able to forecast their needs properly, we would again see a crisis…leaving patients running from pillar to post [to get access to drugs].”
Ministry of health claims the required drugs of TB patients are available for six months. Civil Society groups calculations show they are not there even for three months.
New Delhi: Reacting to the Union health ministry’s statement on Tuesday, September 26, denying any shortage of medicines for patients suffering from drug-resistant TB, civil society groups working in the area of TB management slammed the Union government for disregarding the “very real struggles and suffering” of people on the ground.
Calling media reports ‘vague’, ‘ill–informed’ and ‘misleading’, the health ministry said in a statement, “All these drugs are available with sufficient stocks ranging six months and above.” The full statement can be found here.
The Wire published a pieceon September 22, 2023, that cited family members of TB patients and people working to manage the disease in six states as saying that the acute shortage of drugs had hit patients suffering from drug-resistant TB very hard. The WHO’s TB programme head told The Wire that the UN agency was aware of and concerned about the situation in India. Two doctors The Wire spoke to also expressed concern – saying the shortage could have irreversible consequences for patients. The Union health ministry had not replied to the queries sent by The Wire.
Responding to the ministry’s denial, a joint statement from five civil society groups said:
“The TB community in India consisting of TB survivors, TB Advocates, CCM members representing the TB affected community, Clinicians treating TB Patients and TB Champions are very concerned with the notice from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW)today saying that the TB Drugs stock out situation is a myth and a media hype.”
The organisations said that they were “up until today” inundated with “distressing appeals from patients, relatives and doctors alike who are grappling with difficulties in obtaining TB medications”.
The statement was endorsed by TB Mukth Vahini [Bihar]; ARK Foundation [Nagaland]; Global Coalition of TB Advocates, a global body of civil society groups; Rainbow TB Forum [Tamil Nadu]; and Touched by TB, a national coalition of people affected by TB in India.
The ministry released information about stocks of various drugs available in Maharashtra and at the national level, claiming that they would last six months.
However, a calculation done by a civil society group member, Vaishnavi Jayakumar, using the data from the tenders available online, shows that one drug is available just for a month, another one for less than one month, and so on and so forth. Jayakumar looked at the tenders to understand the yearly requirement of these drugs and thus deduced the monthly requirement. The tenders are available on the Central Medical Services Society (CMSS)’s website. CMSS is a government of India undertaking that is tasked with procuring drugs.
“Our calculation clearly shows that not one drug’s stock will last for six months. It is less than three for most of them – and for some, it is even less than one month,” Jayakumar told The Wire. She added, “To be in a comfortable position, the government knows that the states must have a stock for three months at the very least.”
The health ministry’s statement said that data on drug availability was sourced from the Nikhsay Aushadhi digital platform for TB patients. The civil society groups said that there was no way to cross-check the Nikhsay Aushadhi figures and asked if the government’s claims were true, why then was there such a critical stockout situation across the country.
“It is disheartening to see the recent communication from the MoHFW, which seems to disregard the very real struggles and suffering endured by the people on the ground. Such a disconnect between the statement by the MoHFW and the lived experiences of TB patients is concerning and counterproductive to our achieving the Honorable Prime Minister’s goal of eliminating TB by 2025,” the statement concludes.
India had 2.69 million patients in 2018, a drop of 50,000 from the previous year.
New Delhi: New data released by the World Health Organisation shows a decrease of TB cases in India by 50,000 since 2017. However, the country is still the world leader in TB cases, with an enormous 2.69 million patients, which amounts to 27% of the world’s patients.
The small decline in TB cases between 2017 and 2018 in India is in line with the global trend. The notification of TB cases in India has also increased, which is a positive development. However, while the decrease in TB cases and its rate in India is small and slow, deaths because of the disease have increased.
According to the WHO’s Global TB Report 2019, India had 2.69 million patients in 2018. In 2017, the number was 2.74 million cases. The drop of 50,000 patients is a 1.8% decline. The incidence of TB cases also dropped from 204 per 100,000 people in 2017 to 199 in 2018. The number of drug-resistant TB cases has also fallen, but by a mere 5,000 people. The current number of people with drug-resistant TB in India is still large at 1.3 lakh in 2018.
While the decline itself is good, the percentage of decline in comparison with the enormousness of India’s actual TB burden of 2.69 million people, indicates that India’s project of TB control is slow and the task at hand is large.
The notification of TB cases in India has increased. This is good news considering that figures for India’s TB burden were revised and increased a few years ago due to the phenomenon of India’s “missing millions,” where TB patients were being treated in the private sector or not receiving treatment at all. These cases were not being tracked by the Indian government.
But even then, at least 5.3 lakh TB patients could be missing from the government’s surveillance. While 2.69 million people are estimated to have TB as per the new report, only 2.1 million are notified.
On the issue of notification, the WHO notes: “Most of the increase in global notifications of TB cases since 2013 is explained by trends in India and Indonesia, the two countries that rank first and third worldwide in terms of estimated incident cases per year. In India, notifications of new cases rose from 1.2 million to 2.0 million between 2013 and 2018 (+60%).”
India is among the eight countries which account for two-thirds of the global TB burden. But India is the only country where TB cases are in two-digit percentage points of the global count. While India is responsible for 27% of world’s TB cases, the other seven countries (China, Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh and South Africa) all contribute between 3% to 9%. In total, 30 countries, including these eight, account for 87% of the world’s TB cases.
Deaths from TB increase
While the number of TB cases fell by 50,000 between 2017 and 2018, the number of deaths from TB increased by 30,000. In 2018, 4.4 lakh people died from TB and the corresponding number was 4.1 lakh in 2017.
A reason for the rising number could be that a large number of TB patients in India don’t get treatment. The Global TB Report says only 74% of Indian TB patients are able to get treatment. Many TB patients are not notified and thus are not being tracked by the government’s TB programme. This also means they could be getting incorrect treatment or maybe no treatment at all. This also could be a reason for the deaths.
The global report says that among the 30 countries with a high burden of multi drug-resistant TB patients, the success rate of treatment was 50% or lower in India. In India, two reasons for the low success rates were high rates of death and loss to follow-up (19% and 19%), says the WHO.
India’s health ministry wanted to distribute a life saving TB drug only to patients in big cities. A girl from Patna fought the government and won, but it was too late for her.
Shreya Tripathi loved to read. And it should come as no surprise that the 19-year-old, who died needlessly from a drug-resistant strain of tuberculosis (TB), felt a particular connection to the 2012 novel The Fault in Our Stars.
The story is, after all, focused on teenagers locked in a mortal battle with cancer as their biologic foe. Shreya’s sister had given her the novel after Shreya became too breathless to leave her bed, the result not only of an infectious TB pathogen but of a society’s unwillingness to help her survive.
Shreya was one of the 10 million people who become sick with TB each year and one of the almost 1.6 million who die annually from this curable infectious disease. Unfortunately for the young woman from Patna, she was also one of the 580,000 people who are stricken with a type of TB known as “drug-resistant TB.”
Scientifically, having this type of TB means that the most powerful anti-TB medications available no longer work against the strain and thus treatment must instead consist of five-seven “second choice” drugs that need to be given for a minimum of 9-24 months. Colloquially, this type of TB is often known as “killer TB” because fewer than 50% of those who receive treatment are cured of their disease.”
But the numbers – as shocking as they are – can be sterile and distance us from the profound individual suffering that seems to hide in the multitudes. And this is a story about the valiant struggle of a very specific young woman.
Her name was Shreya. She loved the color pink. Her favorite fruits were litchis whose cool juiciness made the hot summer days in India a thing to look forward to. That is, until her lungs became so scarred and clogged with the TB bacteria, that even the most minimal efforts left her gasping for air.
The bedaquiline drug
When bedaquiline, the first new drug developed for the treatment of TB in almost fifty years and the only medication for DR-TB that had ever been tested in a randomised, controlled clinical trial, hit the market, clever Shreya – who had been fighting drug-resistant TB for almost two years – heard about the medication and correctly thought “this is what my body needs.”
Although the phase III study result are not expected until 2020, results from thousands of patients assessed by the WHO show that early use of bedaquiline was associated with remarkably high rates of treatment success. In most settings, above 80% were successful, even when it was given to the most critically ill people living with the disease.
Why did the doctors, people who Shreya trusted and went to looking for help, not offer her bedaquiline? There may never be a satisfactory answer to this question – certainly not for Shreya’s family, who gave up everything to search for a cure for their beloved daughter.
Chemical structure of bedaquiline. Credit: Wikimedia Commons
The RNTCP’s hindrances
India’s Revised National TB Control Program (RNTCP) frequently tries to explain away the great injustice they perpetrated against this young woman. Sometimes, they hide behind a meaningless scientific facade, claiming there was not enough medical evidence to give Shreya the drug.
Most often, they cloak themselves in the respected mantle of public health responsibility and talk about preventing the development of resistance to this precious medication and how they need to “protect” bedaquiline in case people need it in the future. They almost never mention how they failed to protect Shreya, whose life depended on receiving bedaquiline as soon as possible.
No. Instead of protecting her, the RNTCP forced Shreya – who was fighting for her life – to have to spend some of her last days on earth fighting against the formidable bureaucracy. Because even though she should have been preparing for university, she instead asked her father to prepare for court, telling him that even if it was too late for her, she wanted her suffering to have meaning.
She was blessed by a family that listened to her. Her court case asserting her right to be treated with bedaquiline was taken up by human rights champions, Anand Grover and his colleagues at the Lawyers Collective. They filed a suit against the RNTCP in the Delhi high court, where over the course of several weeks, Shreya’s fate hung in the balance.
The court case
The RNTCP put up quite a fight to keep bedaquiline out of the hands of this dying girl. First, they claimed Shreya did not live in one of the cities where bedaquiline was approved for use.
When Shreya’s family moved to one of those cities, they then claimed that Shreya needed to prove she actually had highly drug-resistant TB, even though they themselves had the medical test results documenting such resistance from their own laboratories.
They then claimed she did not have a chance of being cured because there were not enough drugs with which to pair the bedaquiline to stop her TB. They did not want to “waste” the bedaquiline trying to save her life.
Advocating for Shreya was one of the best – and also the bravest – TB physicians in India, Dr Zarir Udwadia. He was backed by a team of international experts who could not help but be moved to action when they heard about Shreya’s fight.
Although Shreya eventually prevailed, with the judge ruling that the RNTCP must provide access to bedaquiline for her, the victory was hollow. Because of the months it took to overcome the endless barriers erected by the RNTCP, Shreya’s lungs were destroyed. Bedaquiline, along with other medications, was able to kill the TB germ. But nothing could be done to make the lung cells healthy again: only scars remained, leaving her breathless.
Delhi high court. Credit: PTI
Not much has changed
And perhaps what would be most troubling to Shreya: access to bedaquiline for people in India has not improved. Since 2015, only about 2,000 people in the country have received bedaquiline, a mere 3% of those in need of the drug using conservative estimates.
This is the case even though the drug is free. Even though it has been recommended for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis since 2013. Even though, almost 65,000 people in India develop drug-resistant TB each year and a mere 46% of them will be cured.
Shreya Tripathi did not need to die, and there is nothing more devastating than the senseless death of a child. In spite of having better lifesaving drugs like bedaquiline, every day, the list grows with the names and suffering of the young, who, like Shreya, officially die of multidrug-resistant TB but whose cause of death is far more insidious.
Taken alone, they are single points of heartbreak. But when viewed all together, they form something that should ravage our collective consciousness, not only because they did not need to die but because, in essence, we helped kill them.
Dr Jennifer Furin is an infectious diseases clinician and medical antrhopologist. She is currently a lecturer at Harvard Medical School. She was one of the experts who had filed an opinion in the Delhi high court in Shreya’s case, regarding giving her access to bedaquiline.
Experts believe counselling for patients to start their treatment, to keep taking their medicines, to deal with any side effects and to combat shame is the only way the country will eliminate TB.
Manoj Kumar sat, emaciated, on a hospital bed, with a black scarf over his mouth. His legs were nearly as thin as his arms and he could no longer walk. “Everyone used to come close to me,” he said. “They loved me. But now no one cares about me. I feel so helpless.”
Last year, Manoj, who is 36, came down with a persistent fever and cough. Then blood started appearing when he went to the toilet. He was diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB), a bacterial disease which slowly devastates the lungs and other parts of the body, killing the patient unless they receive treatment.
Manoj is one of many Indian citizens coping with this terrible disease. India has the highest burden of both TB and drug-resistant TB in the world, with 2.7 million of the world’s ten million people diagnosed with the disease in 2017. Some 135,000 had the drug-resistant form, a quarter of the world’s total. India and other poorer countries are struggling to cope as the drug-resistant forms of TB create new challenges.
In Victorian times, authors such as Charles Dickens wrote movingly about what they then called consumption which was a major killer in the West until the invention of antibiotics 70 years ago. It is still rife in India in both its traditional and now drug-resistant forms.
Manoj was told he had the multi-drug-resistant (MDR) form of the disease, meaning it would not respond to two of the most powerful anti-TB medications. It would take two years to treat, using drugs with potential side effects including deafness, psychosis and seizures. He came to the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (NITRD) in Delhi, one of the top government TB hospitals in India, to be put on treatment. He received antibiotics for four months but saw no improvement. He has been back at the hospital for two months receiving a different mix of drugs: ten tablets and one injection every day.
Manoj is originally from Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh. He lives there with his wife and 11-year-old son in a single room, close to his mother and two brothers. Since he was diagnosed with TB, most family members have refused to visit him, and he has become depressed. “I feel so lonely now…I feel like committing suicide at times,” he said. He has suicidal thoughts a lot, especially when he calls his family members to ask them to visit him and most don’t come. Negative thoughts are a known side-effect of MDR TB medication but Manoj has not received any counselling.
His family fears they will catch TB from him if they visit. He said this is why TB patients often keep their disease a secret from their community. “They are not comfortable because everyone else starts discriminating against them,” he said. “Other people feel scared that they might get TB from the TB patient.”
The exterior of the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (NITRD) in Delhi. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
Tackling TB in India
The fear of infection is not unfounded – while there are only around 5,000 cases of TB in the UK a year, around the world it is the single biggest infectious killer, outranking HIV. This is despite the fact that it is completely curable with timely diagnosis and treatment.
Within the country, more than 420,000 TB patients – some also with HIV – died in 2017, a figure higher than the population of Cardiff. It is thought there are between one and five million ‘missing’ patients going unreported. Those who are undiagnosed or receiving lower-quality treatment are more likely to transmit the killer disease to other people.
Despite these multiple challenges, the Indian government has ambitious plans to eliminate TB by 2025, ten years earlier than the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) global deadline. However, doctors, NGOs, survivors and advocates warn that India almost certainly will not meet the target because of a lack of disease prevention, delays in correctly diagnosing patients, inadequate treatment and the growing epidemic of drug-resistant TB.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism travelled to India to learn about the devastating issues faced by MDR TB patients and to witness in practice how the national TB control programme is working to eliminate the disease within seven years. We visited hospitals, treatment centres, patient support groups and patients living in the slums of Delhi.
“India has done a lot of politicking and they know the right words to say but they haven’t been brave enough, I think, to look their epidemic in the face and try to do the things we know work,” said Dr Jennifer Furin, Lecturer on Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School and practicing doctor.
The Bureau asked the Indian government’s TB control programme for a comment but it did not respond by the time of publication.
What is TB?
TB is an infectious airborne disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Typically, it affects the lungs but it can also affect other parts of the body like the gut and spine. Symptoms include coughing (sometimes with blood), high fever, fatigue, weakness, weight loss and infertility in women.
It is spread through infection coughing, sneezing, breathing or speaking, especially in crowded or poorly-ventilated areas like hospitals, prisons and slums. Around 40% of people in India, a higher proportion than elsewhere in the world, carry the bacteria. This is known as having latent TB, and only one in ten will go on to develop the disease. People with HIV are much more vulnerable to TB: there are 86,000 people in India who have both HIV and TB. India’s high rate of diabetes also exacerbates the problem as diabetics are also more prone to TB. Breathing in pollution, and heavy smoking or alcohol habits also increase the risk of the disease.
There are currently no vaccines to prevent TB in adults, though there are 12 currently in clinical trials. The bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is administered to children in India, but only prevents severe forms of TB. It is less effective against respiratory TB, the most common form of TB in adults.
A disease of poverty
While TB affects everyone, it is widely known as a disease of poverty. The poorer the community, the greater the likelihood of people becoming infected and developing the disease. More than 13% of people in India live in poverty, according to the World Bank’s latest figures, from 2015.
East of Delhi, beyond an abandoned coal power station, is an urban slum known as Burari. There, 1.5 million people live in just 11 square kilometres. The buildings there are unauthorised and, as such, the government does not provide basic services like electricity.
There are open drains, which flood the narrow roads with sewage when it rains. Children run through the foul-smelling water barefoot. The drinking water comes from hand pumped boreholes. There are crumbled buildings, bogs covered in green slime and rubbish piles everywhere, with children scavenging or flying kites on them. Dogs line the streets. In some areas, there are outbreaks of dengue, malaria and chikungunya. TB is also rife, as the bacteria proliferate in the dank, dark conditions.
Children play on waste ground on the outskirts of Delhi. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
The people living here are poor; many are migrant workers and labourers, eking out an existence on a daily wage. People living in such areas tend to be malnourished which lowers their immune system and makes them more susceptible to TB. Many live in crowded houses, with whole families living in one room, so families are more likely to catch the disease from an infected member.
In one part of the slum two or three members of every family are being treated for TB, said Jyoti Gupta, a counsellor with a non-governmental organisation (NGO), TB Alert, which runs TB services in this area as the government does not run clinics here. Instead, healthcare is provided by nine qualified private doctors, 130 informal providers (called quack doctors by critics) and NGOs.
There can be a lack of education around symptoms of illness in poor communities like Burari. Factors such as the cost of travel, fear they will lose out on their daily income or the perception doctors might look down on them all mean that people in poor communities can be less likely to seek healthcare. Without access to good quality healthcare there are longer delays between diagnosis and cure. This, in turn, perpetuates the spread of TB.
TB Alert stepped in to provide TB services in the Burari slum in 2008 and diagnosed 300 patients within the first year. Now, some 11,500 patients a year are found and diagnosed. The NGO runs five clinics where people are screened for TB, tested for HIV and diabetes, and where diagnosed patients pick up their medicines daily.
A large expanse of polluted waste-water on the outskirts of Delhi. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
There are thousands of slums like Burari in poor and densely-populated areas of cities all across India where TB is rife. In a city like Mumbai, 3% of the population has TB and it is one of the leading causes of death, disability and unemployment. “We can’t just address TB as a disease with drugs, but also [have to address] other social issues: housing, food, out of pocket expenses,” said Blessina Kumar, CEO of the Global Coalition of TB Activists and a TB survivor herself. She added: “The populations that get TB are the most vulnerable and the most marginalised.”
The NGO faces many logistical problems common in TB clinics. Staff report delays in patients receiving their diagnosis from the local hospital and delays in obtaining key lab equipment. The government does provide free TB drugs, but they often arrive late, sometimes with only a few weeks before they are due to expire. Sometimes only drugs for TB patients, not those with drug-resistant strains, arrive.
“The delay in medicine supply creates a problem for the patients,” said Shobha, a lab technician at TB Alert. “The patient has to make do with half their dose. Sometimes they are told to make do without any medicines.” Missed or half doses are a primary cause of the development of more resistant forms of the disease.
Curing TB – a long, hard haul
The cure for TB is long and difficult, involving six months of taking a cocktail of four drugs with undesirable side effects, and a 20% chance of the disease returning. But whereas combating TB is well-understood, new strains are challenging overburdened health systems in poorer countries.
Now, drug-resistant strains have become common in India, and the country is struggling to cope. These strains can take between nine months and two years to treat. The drugs for these carry even more severe side effects. Only one in two Indians recover from multi-drug resistant TB and only one in three make it if they have extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB. “It’s absolutely unacceptable,” said Dr Furin.
Drug resistance develops when patients with TB are mismanaged. People with TB are given a strict six-month regimen of four drugs and attend a clinic every day so a health worker can check that they have taken their medicines. If people with TB are given inappropriate or ineffective drugs, resistance can evolve. Patients might be treated with a single antibiotic rather than the recommended cocktail, or the drugs might be of poor quality or kept in bad storage conditions.
A teenager with drug-resistant TB spends most of his time inside his home. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
If the patient doesn’t take their medicine every day for the full course, they can develop drug resistance. Drug-resistant TB can then be transmitted in the same way as classic TB, from person to person, especially in crowded places like prisons, hospitals and slums.
The drugs used to treat drug-resistant TB can trigger severe side effects. For example, between 40% and 60% of people put on them go deaf. Dr Furin said she has to tell her patients: “It’s better to lose your hearing than to die”.
The main TB antibiotic, rifampicin, turns the body’s secretions red. Other side effects of TB drugs include gastrointestinal problems, dizziness, vomiting, skin discolouration, hepatitis, nerve damage (causing weakness, numbness and pain), under-active thyroid and epileptic seizures. One of the medications, cycloserine, can also trigger depression, anxiety and psychosis.
Patients are often not told about these side effects because doctors in government hospitals are overburdened and don’t have the time to counsel patients. Nandita Venkatesan, 26, survived an eight-year battle with a rare form of intestinal TB. She has since become a TB advocate and mentor. She was given kanamycin injections to treat her TB and lost her hearing as a result.
She was not told about this side effect, so the experience was all the more traumatic. “The hearing loss was catastrophic to say the least,” she said. She was not forewarned, she added. “So I slipped into a very long period of depression.”
A combination of many factors, including the awful side effects of medications, the inconvenience of treatment, lack of education and people migrating to different parts of the country for work or family commitments means many patients stop taking their medicine. Others die before completing treatment.
The system is so disruptive for patients that many stop taking their medicines once they feel better, said Dr Batra. Government healthcare facilities are only open from 8 am-4 pm. She added: “If a man is a daily wage labourer, is he going to work or is he going to go for his TB treatment? He might go for one, two days a week, he can’t go for six months. Typically, when patients start feeling better they drop out, and that’s how drug-resistant TB sets in.”
The NGO, Operation Asha, has devised systems to keep patients taking their medications, Dr Batra said. It has started running clinics in places more convenient for patients: temples and mosques, as well as community centres. It also uses eye scanners and fingerprint scanners to identify patients when they come to take their medicines, so the staff is absolutely sure that patients have taken their pills. Notifications are sent back to the office in real time.
If a patient doesn’t turn up, an Operation Asha health worker visits their house that day to support them, give them medication and find out why they have not attended.
However, there is currently little to no follow up of patients in government hospitals or community clinics once they are discharged, or if they stop turning up to take their medicine. Patients drop out at every level. Some 18% of drug-resistant TB patients are lost after diagnosis. “Nobody knows and nobody cares,” Dr Batra said.
Cursed – how TB still carries stigma
One of the biggest barriers to elimination in India is that the condition is still seen as shameful, according to Dr Batra. “TB has been regarded as a curse from the gods, or for your past karma, anything except a curable infectious disease,” she said. “Stigma is a very big issue. [Patients say] ‘my husband will know, my neighbours will know, my landlord will know and I’ll be thrown off my patch of land where I’ve made my hut.’”
Women who suffer TB are regularly divorced or fear for their future marriage prospects. Around 100,000 women a year are abandoned by their families to die of disease and starvation because they have TB, according to a 2008 government report. Venketasan said she was recently contacted by a man whose family was pressuring him to leave his wife as she had TB. “I was telling him ‘don’t do this. This is the time your wife needs you and she needs your support,’” she said.
The same report said 300,000 children are forced to leave school every year because of TB. “Either they are too sick, the school authorities don’t want them, or the wage-earning parent is sick and they have to take up a job,” Dr Batra said.
Relatives sleep outside a hospital in Delhi. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
Manoj Kumar, for his part, claims his son has been thrown out of school due to his father’s TB diagnosis. “His name was struck off from the school roll by the principal,” Manoj said. “They feel that since I have this disease my son might be a carrier, and through him, other children might get the disease…it makes me feel very helpless to think about how I am able to do nothing for my son and how he is suffering because of my disease,” he added.
Both Dr Batra and Venketasan believe counselling for patients to start their treatment, to keep taking their medicines, to deal with any side effects and to combat shame is the only way India will eliminate TB. Having people go to patients’ homes and explain to their whole families the importance of taking the medications, of good nutrition and to talk about any side effects they might be experiencing is very effective and means fewer patients stop treatment, they said. “If I had been given proper counselling, I would have faced fewer problems than I had to face,” Venketasan said. Currently, the government relies on NGOs like Operation Asha and TB Alert to counsel patients.
Some people believe the word ‘stigma’ in itself is problematic. “We use the word stigma but what these people face is frank discrimination,” said Dr Jennifer Furin. “If you’re going to be beaten up and kicked out of your house, that’s not stigma, it’s violence and discrimination. If you’re fired from your job because you have MDR TB, that’s discrimination,” she said.
Patients also put pressure on themselves. Venketasan talks of what she calls ‘self-stigma’, where patients begin to feel ashamed of themselves, that it is their own fault they have the disease. “There is a deep silence about this illness,” she said. “All this compounds into self-stigma, which is very high. You start thinking, ‘Is it my crime that I got this illness?’”
As a result, suicidal tendencies are very common, though there is a paucity of research on this. One small study looking at suicide in TB patients in South Africa found 9% of patients had suicidal thoughts, and 3% had a history of suicide attempts. “That was the case with me myself,” said Venketasan. “I was in a very late phase of depression, I had all the wrong thoughts of giving up more than once.”
Diagnosing TB
One of the most important pillars of eliminating TB is a timely diagnosis, as each undiagnosed patient can transmit the disease to others. A study by the Global Coalition of TB Activists found it took between a month and more than two years for patients to get a proper diagnosis. “That’s the most dangerous time in terms of transmission,” said Blessina Kumar, CEO of the Global Coalition of TB Activists.
Here, too, doctors think that the stigma of TB has led to some patients being reluctant to be screened. “First of all, a patient would be in denial. ‘I don’t have TB, I can’t have TB, my son can’t have TB. We are a better class than the neighbours so how can we get TB.’ All these things will be there in their minds.” said Dr Batra.
Some 70% of people in India also visit private doctors or people practicing alternative systems of medicine, called quack doctors by critics, for their treatment. Not all are attuned to diagnosing TB, or know the correct cocktail of drugs to prescribe to patients.
Private doctors should notify the government when a TB diagnosis is made, and now receive an incentive of Rs 500 when they do so. But it is still not always done. In 2017, just over 400,000 notifications were made from the private sector, compared to more than 1.5 m from the public sector.
Diagnosing TB through examining sputum under a microscope. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
Varun Kumar, 22, told the Bureau that it took two months for him to be diagnosed with MDR TB at a private hospital. During that time he received hospital visits from his two brothers. His younger brother Shivam also became infected and then died, also in a private hospital. “They did not provide proper treatment,” Varun said. “By the time my brother was brought to the government hospital for treatment it was too late. He was admitted for six to seven days after which he passed away.”
Even if patients reach a competent doctor, TB is difficult to diagnose as the symptoms can be similar to viral illnesses, pneumonia or bronchitis. The method most commonly used to diagnose TB in India is sputum smear microscopy, where a patient’s phlegm is smeared on a glass slide and examined under a microscope. It is widely used because it is inexpensive and straightforward. It doesn’t require a laboratory so it can be done in community centres. But it is insensitive: it misses up to half of the cases. “We are using sputum smear tests, a test that is over 100 years old. Why are people being given tests that are not accurate?” asked Blessina Kumar.
She and others believe sputum smear tests should be replaced by a faster and more accurate molecular test, called GeneXpert or CBNAAT. CBNAAT is highly sensitive, takes only two hours to produce a result, and tells doctors the patient has a drug-resistant form of the disease. However, in reality, obtaining results takes longer in busy hospitals, being dependent on staffing. TB Alert staff in the Burari centre said tests could take ten days to come back. The machines are expensive, with units costing $17,000 and each individual test costing nearly $10. It also requires a constant electricity supply and air conditioning, which is not always easy to obtain in poor or rural areas.
There are currently 1,135 CBNAAT machines across the whole of India, which is divided into 644 districts. However, there are many remote areas too far from a CBNAAT machine for it to be used routinely. Blessina pointed to better practice elsewhere. “In South Africa, the moment the CBNAAT machines came out, the prime minister ordered thousands.”
After a CBNAAT test, in order to tell which strain of MDR or XDR TB the patient has and which customised cocktail of drugs will work best to cure their infection, further tests called ‘drug susceptibility tests’ need to be done in a laboratory, which can take several weeks. This is crucial as without it the patients can be put on the wrong regimen of drugs, which means their disease is not being cured and fuels resistance.
While the 2017 Indian government guidelines advise carrying them out, they are not always done. In 2015, only a quarter of patients were offered the tests, according to the government’s own report. Drug susceptibility testing “is just not happening today,” Venkatesan said. “Even if the government claims it is happening, it is not. I know of people who have been diagnosed almost six months to a year late, and a year is too long a time to be lost and you’ll end up becoming resistant to more drugs in this time. And that’s because the drug susceptibility tests were not done.”
XDR TB: Shakuntala’s story
Along her neck, 26-year-old Shakuntala has a series of puckered scars where her brown skin is twisted and shiny. In 2015, she was working as a nursery school teacher, but she soon became so ill that she couldn’t work.
She had a fever, and lost her appetite. Then she got swellings and knots in her throat that were very painful. She went to the doctor but blood tests carried out came back normal. It was only after they tested the fluid from the swellings that they diagnosed her with TB in May. Her brother had previously suffered the disease and she may have caught it from him.
After six months of treatment with four antibiotics, it was found she had MDR TB – and in multiple organs, including her abdomen lymph nodes, which is why there was swelling on her neck. She had her lymph nodes removed, which left her with a series of scars.
From 2016 to 2017, she began treatment with a different regimen of drugs. The injections she had to take caused headaches and dizziness. “My entire body temperature used to rise and that would make my temper very sour,” she said.
As the end of her treatment was near, she began to look for a job. People asked her about the marks on her neck, asking her if she had a disease, or if she had been burnt. She told them about her TB and was rejected from several jobs. “I did not feel bad when people would ask me about it,” she said. “But I was really hurt when people started declining jobs to me because of these marks as I know that I was capable of doing those jobs.”
Shakuntala, who has extensively drug-resistant TB, speaks about her experience. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
When she did eventually find a job, she fell ill again. She was admitted to a hospital and it was found that pus had accumulated in her liver. Just when she thought she was going to be cured, tests showed she had XDR TB, which has such a bad prognosis many consider it a death sentence. She had heard XDR TB can lead to blindness and felt worried. She said she cried a lot that day.
This time the medicines turned her complexion dark red, and she felt a strange sensation in her legs. Last November she was admitted to a hospital again as she was vomiting and couldn’t digest anything she ate. She was so weak she could barely walk. “I wanted to die,” she said. “That was a very low point for me.” At the hospital, they gave her a blood transfusion. Since then her health has improved.
Her father, who sells lemons at a market in Azadpur Mandi, Asia’s biggest fruit and vegetable market in Delhi, has been supporting her throughout her treatment. “Come what may, he always finds a way to bear the financial responsibilities of my treatment and health,” she said.
Most of her friends are now married, so they no longer live in Burari. Shakuntulah said she hopes to get married when she becomes healthy again. “I wish for a boy who does not stop me from doing anything. And who accepts me despite my having suffered from this disease.”
The poorest shoulder the heavy costs of TB
Back in Ghaziabad, Manoj had a job selling momos from a cart. When he was diagnosed with TB, he had to quit his job, and his family is now suffering financially. His wife has taken out loans to support Manoj’s stay in Delhi for treatment. “I want to work but I am so weak that I cannot,” he said. The family is unable to give their son everything that he needs.
This story is common; families, where a member has TB, will lose 30-60% of their income. “People are thrown out of jobs, entire families sink into poverty,” said Dr Batra. “The loss of wages alone in the country is up to $300m [£230m] annually.”
The government’s elimination strategy for TB does focus on reducing the catastrophic costs of TB, as does WHO’s End TB strategy. In April 2018, the Indian government introduced a subsidy of Rs 500 a month for every TB patient so they can buy the food they need, as nutrition is so important in fighting the disease. However, only newly-diagnosed patients can currently claim the subsidy. Patients also need a bank account and an Aadhaar number.
The Bureau asked the Central TB Division in India how many people had received the subsidy since April but it did not respond. Reports said only 12% of eligible patients had received it, two months after it was announced.
A busy street in the Burari district of Delhi. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
Searching for the missing cases
Currently, if a patient has TB or MDR TB, their family should be tested for the disease, according to WHO guidelines. In slum areas where TB is rife, there should be health workers going into the slums to find families with TB, a process known as ‘active case finding’.
The Indian government says it is ramping up active case finding in order to find more missing cases, though it did not respond to the Bureau’s request for how many patients it had found already through this process. In Delhi state, Dr K.K. Chopra carried out programmes to find patients in vulnerable groups: sex workers in brothels and drug addicts. They discreetly found and treated around 70 people. Next, he plans to test prisoners in the Tihar jail, which houses 15,000 inmates in cramped conditions. “Their nutritional conditions and their general behaviour are like that they are vulnerable to TB. So we will be doing daily investigations there,” he said.
Children whose family members have TB, especially drug-resistant forms, should be given antibiotics to prevent them from getting the disease. However, only 11% of eligible children receive this preventative therapy, according to WHO.
Dr Furin fears that without measures, such as these being urgently scaled up in India, the government’s promises of elimination are simply rhetoric. “MDR TB is largely driven by person-to-person transmission,” she said. “We have to find people quickly, they need drug susceptibility testing quickly and they need to be started on the best regimens possible, as quickly as possible, along with preventative therapy for people who have been exposed. That’s the only way it’s going to stop. But nobody’s going to do that under the current Indian administration.”
Rationing new drugs
At the National Institute of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases (NITRD), Dr Rohit Sarin, the hospital’s director, adjusted his glasses and read out a letter from a patient who received bedaquiline, one of the first drugs for MDR TB to be developed in 50 years.
“Honourable sir, it is indeed a big day for me and my family,” Dr Sarin read. “You have not just given me a new life, instead you have given me a new hope, a new beginning, a new vision for my life.”
This patient was one of less than 2,000 who have received bedaquiline, an oral drug which has been recommended by the WHO to replace the injectable antibiotics taken by MDR sufferers. There was initial caution over the antibiotic because trials showed higher mortality in groups that received it (though this was not found to be attributable to the drug). The WHO recommended it in August 2018 after new research was published, including a South African study which found treatment regimens which included bedaquiline reduced MDR TB deaths by two thirds.
In South Africa, where there are 14,000 people with MDR TB, around a tenth of the number of such patients in India, the drug has already been given to 11,000 people. Less than 2,000 have received it in India, despite it being donated by its manufacturer. The government restricted its use to six government hospitals, fearing if it was more widely available, it would be overused and resistance would develop.
The drug is now only given as a last resort in a few hospitals such as NITRD where it is available, and a lengthy process must be followed to receive it, including a long ‘informed consent’ form. Campaigners say this rules out uneducated, illiterate people who might need it. “There’s all kinds of barriers put up,” explained Dr Furin. “And desperate people go to those hospitals but they still don’t get the drug.” In 2017, 18-year-old Shreya Tripathi, who has XDR TB, successfully won a court case in order to access bedaquiline at a private hospital in Mumbai, paving the way for similar legal actions from other patients.
There are many who agree with the government’s view. Dr Jay Desai said those who think the use of bedaquiline will solve the TB crisis are “barking up the wrong tree”. “How does resistance develop?” he said. “Because of lack of compliance. What makes us think people are going to be compliant with bedaquiline?”
Dr Furin believes fears of future resistance should not trump saving dying patient’s lives. “Here you have a country standing up and claiming they are going to eliminate TB by 2025, that’s seven years from now. Yet they ration access to one of the best drugs we have,” said Dr Furin. “TB elimination doesn’t look like that, it’s not what it looks like.”
TB patients wait for medication at a clinic in the Burari district. Credit: Madlen Davies/The Bureau
Missing India’s target
In order to eliminate TB, the number of new cases will need to be reduced by more than 10-15% every year, the government admits. It is currently decreasing at around 2% a year – but the cases of MDR and XDR TB continue to rise.
In 2018, the Indian government increased the budget for TB to $580 million, funding 79% of this itself. But experts question if this is enough when the country spends less than 4% of its GDP on public health, including the private sector, one of the lowest proportions in the world, and a quarter of its urban population still lives in slums.
Experts disagree on whether preventing the disease in the first place, improving housing, improving nutrition, reducing the shame of the condition, facilitating better diagnosis, convincing patients to keep taking their medicines, better access to new drugs or developing a TB vaccine are the most important factors to achieve the target.
If India can challenge the spread of the disease, more Indians will not have to suffer years of painful treatment, like that suffered by Manoj Kumar. He has lost hope in the future. “I am not even sure whether they will be able to treat me successfully or not,” he said. “I do not feel sure whether I will survive or not. I feel very weak even now.” He said if he does recover he would like his son to return to school, and he would like to go back to work to secure a future for his family.
He remembers what life was like before the condition took hold. “I was healthy and could work then,” he said. “All my family and friends were close to me at that time. Now no one likes to come near me.”
Madlen Davies is an award-winning health journalist. Previously she worked for MailOnline, BBC Wales and Pulse magazine.
This article originally appeared on The Bureau of Investigative Journalism website.
Narendra Modi recently reaffirmed India’s commitment to eliminating TB by 2025, five years before the rest of the world. The executive director of the ‘Stop TB Partnership’ spoke to The Wire about the road ahead.
Last week,India hosted the ‘Delhi End TB Summit‘, with a host of world leaders including the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. India has the world’s highest population of people living with tuberculosis (TB), including aboutone million who are estimated to not yet be diagnosed.At the summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, “I am confident that India can be free of TB by 2025.”
The Wire’s Anoo Bhuyan interviewedLucica Ditiu, the executive director of the ‘Stop TB Partnership’, a global network of organisations working to eliminate TB while consolidating political support for it. The partnership cohosted the summit along with WHO and the Indian government. Ditiu discussed India’s plan to eliminate TB by 2025, which is five years sooner than the global target of 2030. She also discussed issues around access to drugs for drug-resistant TB and civil society’s demands for the Indian government to force cheaper production of these drugs.
As someone who has been tracking TB for a long time, where do you see India- What are we doing right and wrong on TB at this moment?
LD: I see India doing very good things, now. They have not covered the entire country and the scale is obviously not there- we’re speaking of a country with the largest scale of TB patients that one can think of. But in terms of policy and theNational Strategic Plan, most of the things that should be done, are there. I think finances for the plan are increasing. So in terms of what should be done, the mindset, the political and financial commitment, things are not bad. Not perfect. But it’s a very good beginning.
I’ll tell you what needs to be worked on. There are two things in my opinion. Firstly, India plans to end TB by 2025. Ending it doesn’t mean it will go to 0 people with TB. There is a definition at the global level. Currently, India’s level is more than 200 per 1,00,000 people. The definition of zero TB, is 10 per 100,000. It’s a long way to go, as you know. But the important thing is, now we’re in 2018, so, to eliminate TB by 2025, we need to make an intensive effort. The country and its leaders should know that the same level of enthusiasm and energy that we see now needs to persist for the next 7 years. This is the biggest challenge because it’s very difficult to maintain the engagement, political commitment, effort and funding. For me this is a huge threat because if something else becomes more important than TB, India will not achieve its goal of eliminating TB.
My second worry is about the implementation arrangements. This is related to the fact that you can have the best decision and the funding, but there are many steps from the capital in Delhi to the smallest village in Delhi. The real distance is also in the mind. At this huge scale, the systems should be constructed and put to work so that this becomes possible.
Lucica Ditiu, executive director of the Stop TB Partnership. Credit: StopTB Partnership
This is what I want to say to the government, that it will be extremely important to have the mind to think this for India. At this scale, you’re going into a battle with TB, and you need to have an army. The worst thing can be that all of these things are available, but because of bureaucracy, legislation and complications, things don’t get implemented. It’s not just India, this has happened in many other places as well.
India’s goal is to eliminate TB by 2025, which is 5 years sooner than the rest of the world. But we also have the largest TB population in the world. After these days of deliberations with the Indian government, what is in place and what is not in place?
LD: This is very much linked to the first question. What is in place as I said, is an incredible political commitment. I have to tell you that Prime Minister Modi is the only head of state currently of such a large nation that came out there and set up a very bold target, asked for a strategic plan and personally monitors what’s going on. Funding is increasing, I understand. I understand the government has plans for nutritional support of TB patients very soon.
What I think needs to be worked on, as I said and everyone is aware of, implementation arrangements need to be done. How do you expand? You need to have a very large management team beyond the technical capacity, at the central level and state levels. That’s why the ministries of state are very important and they came as well for the summit.
But specifically, what is not in place? What can you prescribe to India, on the biggest, most gaping holes?
LD: The plan is there. I don’t think there are things that are hugely missing. If we want to make the impact of ending TB by 2025 which is proposed in the national strategic plan, then good. The plan just needs to be implemented.
We also realised recently that India has been under-reporting TB. That’s because of the complicated architecture of the health systems. There are a lot of cases that come to the private sector but they haven’t been tabulated in Indian records. What do you make of the scale of TB in India and what needs to be done to get a more accurate picture of the scale?
LD: This is very correct. It is estimated that maybe a million people with TB are consulting the private sector every year and little is known about what is going on with them- so, regulating the private sector is an important part of ending TB and is a part of the national strategic plan. The scale is large here, in terms of the private sector. There are many types of private hospitals, like your big private networks. But also there are very small cabinet type providers all over, which are the first entry points for many patients. So, there is an entire component in there to bring them on board in different ways.
For a long time, WHO promoted public-private mixes. But at that time, in their perspective, they were sort of obliging the private sector to play ball. That does not work with the private sector. There needs to be thoughts about models that work in other places- to give a carrot to the private sector for them to report TB, but also to continue to provide care to those with TB. This is part of the national strategic plan. It’s not a new thing coming from me. It is there. As I said, implementing it and going with it beyond big cities, to every single state, that is the challenge.
What is your stand on the TB drugs Bedaquiline and Delamanid for drug resistant TB? I have seen your tweets on this. Where do you stand and what do you think India should do on this?
LD: Bedaquiline and Delamanid are two good drugs, but not the drugs that will cure TB on their own. They are drugs to be added to another regimen. According to WHO, its not for everybody. It’s for a subset of a subset of patients. There are about 40000 people who might need it in India but not more than that. But for more than 2 million people with TB in India, this is very small number. And WHO and international recommendations are saying that it should be given under certain conditions. So it’s a very good drug. They are two very good drugs to make life of people with certain types of TB much easier.
We take note & serious discussions will take place in #DelhiEndTB. People with TB in India to have access to new drugs and regimens as recommended by WHO guidelines – when & whom can use. Currently, not for all – check @WHO recommendations. @TerezaKasaeva@StopTB@BrendaWaning
India has access to Bedaquiline as part of a donation between USAID and Janssen currently. I understand, that the Government of India entered into a discussion to see what they can do from 2020 onwards. By then we may get new regimens that include these drugs but will be shorter. So hopefully, many things for India and the world will change by then.
But what I want to say, as I told our colleagues in civil society, is that India should accelerate diagnosing people with drug resistant TB this year. Because Bedaquiline and Delamanid are for these people. In order to give the drug, you need to have people diagnosed. This part of the strategic plan needs to be implemented. To diagnose people and put them on treatment.
These two drugs have some side effects. Any drug will have side effects. However, the side effects of these drugs are linked to cardiovascular systems, so you need to have proper systems to monitor these drugs. You cannot give it to me and say “Lucica, go and be somewhere in a village and I’ll see you in three months,” because in the meantime if I get side effects, I need to see a doctor and have a conversation about it. To really scale up Bedaquiline and Delamanid, you need to ensure you have the ability to diagnose these people, and the right system in place to monitor them.
So I think this is a good opportunity to build all this while this donation programme still exists. And then go to 2020 on a bigger scale. I think this is the plan of the government.
On the issue of Bedaquiline and Delamanid, phase 3 trial data has not come in from anywhere in the world. Phase 3 trials have not even been conducted in India. In light of this, what is keeping you confident about Bedaquiline and Delamanid, and their safety and efficacy?
LD: South Africa is using Bedaquiline and Delamanid a lot in their clinics, but under the conditions I told you about, because WHO has issued clear standards. Under those WHO standards, evidence from the field, like South Africa, is very encouraging for people who have a very bad prognosis. People with several months of multi-drug resistant treatment, who were not doing well, did very very well after treatment with Bedaquiline. But indeed, we need more evidence to go at the huge scale and that’s what WHO is preparing itself very soon for, looking into whatever data is coming in.
Even in the US when [Bedaquiline] was given an accelerated approval, Janssen was told to come back with the data. That was in 2012. Does it worry you that the data hasn’t come out so far? Why don’t we have this data yet?
LD: My focus now is very much on the scale of the programme. I don’t know the real answer to this.
The Indian government does waive off phase 3 trials, but that is when phase 3 has been done somewhere else.
LD: We spend a lot of energy on Bedaquiline and Delamanid. I don’t think that pays back. I think that’s a very good discussion but there are many questions to be answered on this and they have to go in parallel. To properly treat multi-drug resistant TB, you need a cocktail of drugs. These two drugs, the research phase in South Africa, show good results, for small groups of people. You know what I mean? But speaking of treating two million people in India, and finding one million in the private sector, is a huge undertaking. And I’ll be very happy for India to find more people in need of Bedaquiline and Delamanid. They can have as much as they want next year. That’s what I’m focused on. I don’t think I’m the right person to comment on the pure research of Janssen and what they’re doing on the trials.
Confidence usually it comes from data, but the data has not yet come in. A letter has been signed by 60 individuals and organisations worldwide asking India to make this drug accessible. I’m trying to understand what this is based on. Where do you stand on this letter asking India to issue a compulsory license on the drugs? This would allow generic companies to make the drug at a cheaper price. Is this what India needs to do?
LD: To be honest, I think the letter was very limited. I was very disappointed. Civil society in India should ask, where is the missing million? They should ask the government to work with the private sector and find those. Making all that effort in a letter only on Bedaquiline and Delamanid, I don’t think will move the needle. If I was in civil society, I would want to ask for every single person in India to have quality care and treatment. That’s what they should ask. By going piecemeal and speaking only about Bedaquiline and Delamanid now in 2018, when we don’t know how it works, when we don’t know how many people need it, for me was a missed opportunity. It was a bold letter. But new tools, new drugs, new regimens, more money for research, should have been part of it. That should have been something in it.
If the focus is trained on Bedaquiline and Delamanid, are we missing something else?
LD: They just need to implement the national strategic plan. If India can do that, it will be kilometres ahead. The attention should be on finding everyone with TB, diagnosing them and putting them on treatment. And I think if the civil society wants to move, and interact with the government, then they should ask to be part of not only developing the implementation plan, but also monitoring it. Civil society should be watching and asking if the money for nutrition reaching people, if the diagnostic technology accessible, etc. That’s what I think civil society should do- organise themselves to be a part of the solution and also a part of the monitoring.
India is being criticised for being slow on the access to these drugs. Given what we know – that the drugs are showing good results, but we don’t have all the data. That there are other issues which India also needs to simultaneously attend to. That infrastructure for monitoring needs to be in place, but India is challenged on that… Given all this, is it wise for India to continue on a conservative conditional access programme as it is currently doing? Or open the flood gates?
LD: I don’t know. As I keep saying, I’m looking at this from a different perspective. More data is needed for these two drugs, to understand how they work, how they interact with each other, with HIV drugs, with children. We need to know more. South Africa is providing more evidence. A time might come – in fact, it already has come – when we will put these two drugs together and see, what if we put other innovative ideas and obtain a regimen that can be just four or five months in length…
So we cannot afford to throw these drugs into a population, create resistance to them and lose them. In terms of whether India will scale or not, I don’t know. But the need for more data is very great.
A lack of innovation in diagnostics is making Indians more prone to drug-resistant TB, which is difficult to treat and could be fatal.
A lack of innovation in diagnostics is making Indians more prone to drug-resistant TB, which is difficult to treat and could be fatal.
Janki Patil spends most of her time at home. Patil suffers from Extensively Drug-Resistant TB. Credit: Ankur Paliwal
The end of an otherwise typical day in the winter of 2013 would mark the beginning of a hard and lonely battle for 18-year-old Janki Patil (name changed). She woke up in her 100 square foot poorly ventilated one-room house. Her brother and mother – both sick with tuberculosis – were still asleep, on the floor, next to her father, younger sister and grandmother.
As they woke up one by one, Patil re-filled water in big plastic cans, made breakfast, got dressed, packed her lunch and stepped out of the house at around 8 am. She walked lanes so narrow that if she stretched her hands sideways, her fingers would touch the houses on either side.
Patil walked past those tiny houses, women washing clothes along the lanes, open sewers, colourful water pipes, strong fragrance of spices, low-hanging power cables, lots of kids and lots of cats. Coming out of this slum near Asalpha in western Mumbai, she walked for 30 more minutes to reach her workplace, where she printed wedding cards. Patil had left her studies before completing high school. She liked work more than she did books.
Late evening, when Patil was home watching TV, sudden acute pain hit the left side of her chest. She rushed to a family physician who prescribed a few medicines and an X-ray. A day later, when the physician – who was aware of the Patil family medical history – saw her test report, he suspected TB.
He referred her to a chest specialist who diagnosed that Patil had a traditional, easily treatable kind of TB. Little did Patil know that she would soon be sucked into a health system where delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis and use of inefficient diagnostics can make patients like her prone to fatal drug-resistant forms of TB.
Three years later, and even after thousands of medicines and over a hundred injections, Patil suffers from extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, XDR-TB, in which the notorious tuberculosis bacteria in her body are unaffected against most available anti-TB drugs. Only 28% of XDR patients who begin treatment get cured.
While India houses the largest number – 27% – of the world’s 10.4 million new TB patients, Mumbai is the epicentre of the disease in the country. The metropolis has many overcrowded slums where about five people share a house like that of Patil’s. Such spaces are ideal for the TB bacteria to spread.
At 79,000, India also has the highest number of multi-drug resistant, or MDR-TB, patients who don’t respond to the two most powerful TB drugs. Drug-resistant TB has a range from less severe to more severe forms – all fatal if untreated – depending on how resistant the TB bacteria are against the 13 anti-TB drugs.
Even traditional TB is fatal if left untreated. Drug-resistant TB mostly results from indiscriminate use of anti-TB medicines. It is costlier and harder to treat than the traditional form. Patients have to undergo a two-year long treatment with drugs so toxic that several even end up dropping out.
What’s more troubling is that the number of severe drug-resistant forms is rising. A 2015 study that looked at drug-resistance pattern in patients in Mumbai between 2005 and 2013, found that while multi-drug resistant TB cases were dropping, the worse forms, like pre-XDR TB and XDR-TB, were increasing. As many as 57% patients in the sample had pre-XDR TB. “That was worrying,” said Alpa Dalal, a TB and chest physician in Mumbai, who was part of the study. The trend continues.
Vikas Oswal, a TB physician who attends to patients at three different centres in the most TB-affected areas of Mumbai, points to something even more worrisome. People who never had TB are directly getting drug-resistant strains from their affected family or community. The youngest among such cases that Oswal has is an 11-month-old who will have to endure drugs for two years.
One effective way of controlling TB is early and correct diagnosis, which increases the likelihood of a patient getting timely and correct treatment. A recent study co-authored by Nerges Mistry of The Foundation for Medical Research in Mumbai, shows that there is an average delay of 60 days before a patient gets diagnosed, with both patients and doctors responsible for the delay. Patients waste about three weeks ignoring symptoms and trying to self-medicate before approaching a doctor. The doctor then wastes about five weeks in diagnosing a patient. In case of MDR-TB, the delay in diagnosis is close to three months from the time a patient first approaches a doctor. “Doctors keep giving symptomatic treatment using antibiotics without asking for a test,” said Oswal.
Another 2016 study, in which researchers interviewed over 100 general physicians of varying qualification in Mumbai and Patna, confirms Oswal’s point. Most doctors continued to treat their patients by changing antibiotics because they believed that their patients needed treatment more than testing. “I will not think about TB before my regimen fails,” said a doctor in the study. Patients also switch doctors if their condition doesn’t improve. The new doctor might start the same treatment again. Meanwhile, patients roam around infecting people in their family, neighbourhood, workplace and in the mass transport until they are diagnosed and put on the right treatment.
“Unfortunately, the trend in our medical community is more towards treatment and less towards diagnosis,” said Dalal. The practice is rampant in the unregulated private sector where about 50% TB patients seek care. In Mumbai, PATH, an international non-profit, is working with city administration to educate private physicians about correct TB diagnosis and treatment.
§
Patil’s physician had referred her to Tejal Shah, a chest physician who runs a private clinic in Mumbai’s Ghatkopar area. At that time, Shah had already been treating Patil’s brother and mother for about a year. Patil recalls that Shah started her treatment after checking her X-ray report. “She didn’t ask for any sputum based test,” said Patil.
According to Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program guidelines, a patient suspected of having TB should undergo a sputum smear test to confirm whether or not the patient has the disease. The X-ray test can be used to further confirm TB but not as an upfront test. Diseases like bacterial pneumonia and bronchitis can look like TB on an X-ray report.
A lane of the slum where Patil lived when she first contracted TB. Credit: Ankur Paliwal
Shah said that although sputum tests help, many patients, especially children, cannot produce sputum, even after assistance. “She [Patil] could have been that case,” said Shah. Some of such patients cannot afford expensive techniques like bronchoscopy, used to scoop sputum from lungs, which is done in the private sector. “They don’t want to queue up in front of government hospitals for free tests either,” added Shah. She diagnoses such patients based on X-ray test and family medical history. “I find it criminal to start treatment based on X-ray test but sometimes there is no option,” she said. Shah claims to monitor such patients by getting X-ray tests every month.
Patil recalls her monthly X-ray tests and that she has always had problem in coughing out sputum. Shah thinks that the government relies too heavily on sputum tests. “Patients are unnecessarily pressured to give sample even if they cannot.”
Some TB experts believe that it is high time that India scraps sputum smear test, especially in cities like Mumbai, and follows countries like South Africa, which uses a sophisticated tool, GeneXpert, as an upfront test. GeneXpert, with 80% sensitivity, not only tests for TB but also tells whether a patient is multi-drug resistant. “That [sputum smears] is a stone age test in the molecular age,” said Zarir Udwadia, chest physician with P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Center in Mumbai. “When we know the extent of MDR TB, GeneXpert should be made as frequently available as your damn ATM machines,” said Udwadia, perhaps the most vocal doctor against the TB menace in the country.
“The test misses about half of the TB cases,” said Madhukar Pai, the director at Global Health Programs at McGill University in Canada. “India is in a great need to upgrade its diagnostics.” Even in 2016, sputum smear microscopy was the most widely used diagnostic tool in low and middle income countries. A study that used GeneXpert as an upfront test found that TB case detection increased by about 40% and MDR notification increased five fold. “You will save a lot of time and thereby save transmission,” said Udwadia.
Pai said that it will be difficult for India to meet its end TB goalif it continues to rely on sputum smears. Sunil Khaparde, the deputy director general of TB division in the health ministry, thinks otherwise. “Sputum smear tests are easily accessible to patients,” he said. “If a test report is negative and the patient still has symptoms, the sample can directly be sent for GeneXpert testing.” Upfront GeneXpert is done only for patients with extrapulmonary TB, HIV patients who also have TB and children. Sputum sample from patients with traditional pulmonary TB is tested for GeneXpert only if their sputum smear report is positive even after two months of TB treatment. “You also have to see the cost effectiveness of putting GeneXpert everywhere,” said Kharparde. Government of India spends about 1% of its GDP on health, which is among the lowest in the world.
Moreover, access to sputum smear tests isn’t as easy as Khaparde thinks. Consider this – Udgir village, where about 1,200 people live, sits atop a mountain and beyond a forest in Kolhapur district that is about 400 kms south of Mumbai. Kolhapur has over 200 cases of MDR-TB and ten cases of XDR-TB.
Udgir is 40 kms away from the nearest lab where sputum smear test is done. The road between the lab and Udgir is so terrible that it took me two hours to reach there. During that time, only one motorbike passed by me in the name of traffic. Ashwini Ramesh, a frontline health worker in Udgir, said that she cannot travel to the lab even if she collects the sputum sample. “There is no public transport and I don’t have a personal vehicle,” Ramesh said. At the lab, the technician Jayashree Gawli receives about 50 sputum samples a months. Half of them are just saliva that tests negative. Sometimes the sample reaches Gawli so late that it spoils on the way. “I often ask for repeat samples. Sometimes I get, sometimes I don’t,” said Gawli. The distance between Gawli’s lab and the district hospital where the GeneXpert machine is kept is another 70 kms. “It would work really well if we could test the patients where they are,” said Ganesh Patil, Kolhapur district coordinator with Population Survey International, a non-profit headquartered in Washington DC.
Although GeneXpert has revolutionised TB diagnosis, it has its limitations. The machine requires consistent power supply and an air conditioner, which is a remote thought in far-flung electricity starved areas of India. As a result, the penetration of all the 628 GeneXpert machines in the public sector is only till the district hospitals. To overcome this challenge, Cepheid, the company that made GeneXpert, will soon pilot GeneXpert Omni, which is portable, rugged and can run on battery the whole day. Its performance, however, is yet to be seen.
Cost is another barrier. Government hospitals where the test is conducted for free are overloaded with samples. In the private sector, the test costs at least Rs 2,000. And, the problems associated with quality sputum sample persist even in the case of GeneXpert. “Almost all of the innovation in TB diagnosis has been around the tests that are done after a sputum sample is submitted,” said Jennifer Furin, lecturer on Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. “Lot of work is going on looking at serum and urine “biomarkers” but so far nothing is anywhere near clinical testing.” Furin continues, “It is a real shame that the diagnostics lag so far behind in case of TB. “Look at HIV or Ebola where effective, point of care tests were developed so quickly. We should be capable of doing the same thing with TB. But I think a great deal of this lack of innovation is caused by the traditionalist approach.”
Agreeing with Furin, Pai said “We need simpler, non-sputum based, point-of-care test.” But till then, India should implement the best we have today, said Pai. GeneXpert works best as a screening tool to separate drug-resistant TB patients. Shah agrees that Patil should have undergone GeneXpert when she first approached her. “I am learning from my mistakes. Now I try my best to prove TB before relying on X-ray reports.”
§
During the year Patil was undergoing treatment at Shah’s clinic, her mother succumbed to TB, and her father and grandmother passed away. She moved to the house of her maternal grandmother, Bharati Solapurkar (name changed), with her sister. Patil had started to feel better. A few months after the end of her year-long treatment, just when she began to think about going back to work, the pain struck the left side of her chest again.
Worried, she rushed back to Shah who wrote a bunch of tests including GeneXpert, which confirmed that Patil had MDR-TB. It is unclear how Patil got MDR-TB. Realising that she will not be able to afford the treatment, which cost around Rs 2.5 lakhs, Shah referred Patil to Sewri TB hospital, a government hospital in Mumbai, to avail free treatment.
Patil doesn’t have good memories of that hospital. After waiting for several hours at the hospital, when her turn came, she didn’t like how doctors behaved with her. “They were rude and kept telling me stay away, stay away, sit here, sit there,” she recalls. But the doctors started her MDR-TB treatment. Although this treatment lasts for about two years, Patil dropped out after nine months because she didn’t feel any better. “Her treatment regimen was not exactly the one that she probably required,” said Sarthak Rastogi, chest physician with Medicines Sans Frontiers’s (MSF) TB clinic in Mumbai where Patil is currently undergoing XDR-TB treatment. “Probably her resistant pattern was worse than MDR at that time,” said Rastogi. Drug susceptibility testing(DST) at that time would have helped Patil’s case, but it was not done. The DST tells which drugs will work on the patient and which won’t, in other words, the severity of TB. This information helps a doctor customise a treatment regimen. Ideally, a patient’s sputum sample should be sent for DST when she or he is diagnosed with MDR-TB.
Patil’s health kept deteriorating. She felt too exhausted to speak, spent all her time in bed and needed assistance to use the washroom. By this time Patil and Solapurkar had started to feel frustrated because there was no improvement despite taking so many medicines. “One day naani [grandmother] lashed out saying that we better not go anywhere, if you have to die, you will die here only,” Patil recalls. “I also thought that I will die.”
Four such cartridges containing sputum samples can be put in a Gene Xpert machine in one time to test Multi-Drug Resistant TB. The result comes in just two hours. Credit: Ankur Paliwal
Patil recalls fighting this battle alone. “I ran from hospital to hospital, doctor to doctor, taking test after test, all alone,” she said. “I hated it.” Solapurkar, almost 70 years old, was mostly out earning her daily wage and Patil’s sister was busy with school. Patil missed her parents most whenever she saw patients her age accompanied by their parents in hospitals.
Patil’s condition made Solapurkar borrow money in order to admit her to Disha Hospital, a private hospital in Mumbai, for a week. It was here, in November 2015, that Patil’s sample was sent for DST for the first time. “Her DST was ordered very late,” said Rastogi. Patil’s DST report confirmed that she had XDR-TB.
“An important test like DST is severely underutilised in India,” said Pai. There aren’t too many DST labs, with just 67 across India. If a patient is diagnosed with MDR-TB in Kolhapur district, which doesn’t have DST facility, the patient’s sample has to be sent 250 kms away to Pune. TB officials in Kolhapur order the DST test only if the sputum test report is positive despite three months of MDR-TB treatment. It can take up to three months for the DST test report to arrive in Kolhapur. Till then, the patient keeps taking MDR-TB treatment, while she or he might actually have XDR-TB. “The process of universal DST will take time,” said Khaparde.
Patil’s DST report showed that only two out of 13 available drugs worked for her. She needed customised treatment using one or both of the new drugs, Bedaquiline and Delamanid. An effective regime contains at least four working drugs. Both the new drugs are hard to access. While Bedaquiline, strictly regulated by the government, is available in just six cities, including Mumbai, Delamanid is not even registered in India. It can only be accessed through a lengthy process called compassionate use, in which a doctor has to write to the drug maker, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals in this case, requesting it to make the drug available because the patient has no other option left but to take that drug. It is up to the drug maker to provide the drug or not. Bedaquiline can also be accessed through compassionate use. Recently, health activists wrote to the government to direct Otsuka Pharmaceutical to register the drug in India. Currently, about 60 XDR-TB patients have access to Delamanid. There are over 3000 XDR-TB patients in India.
Bedaquiline was yet to be rolled out by the government when Patil was at Disha Hospital. Realising that the available treatments were ineffective and costly for Patil, doctors referred her to MSF’s TB clinic in Mumbai that provides free treatment to patients like Patil. However, given the limited resources, the non-profit can only treat a few patients. Currently, 72 patients are enrolled at the clinic. It is a miniscule number given the size of the problem.
Patil visited MSF’s clinic in January 2016. “She could barely walk or talk,” recalls Rastogi. “Her lungs were extensively damaged.” MSF applied for Delamanid, which arrived in June. Meanwhile, she took drugs that helped her get by. After June, Patil’s health started to improve. Her recent sputum test report was negative, but her treatment must continue till two years for a complete recovery. “Even after her treatment ends she might not be able to recover her lung functions fully,” said Rastogi. “Like she might not be able to run and catch a train like us.”
Patil says that she feels much better. She is gaining weight. She often visits her relatives in the city. At home, her favourite way to pass time is to stand near the window of her house and watch the boys play cricket outside. “I like it when they make noise,” she said.
Patil has a long road ahead. The Delamanid, which was sent to her in a six-month dose, is about to run out soon. Doctors at the MSF clinic were weighing different options, including reapplying to Otsuka Pharmaceuticals for compassionate use, when I last spoke to them.
After her two-year-long treatment gets over, Patil would like to go back to school. “Earlier I didn’t like to study. Now I feel good education will get me a good job,” said Patil. “I will be able to take the burden off my grandmother.”
The reporting of this story was supported by the MSF Media Fellowship.
Ankur Paliwal is a freelance science and health journalist based in New Delhi.