Delhi Riots: ‘Police Covering Flaw’, Court Drops Arson Charges Against 10

The ASJ said arson charges cannot be invoked merely on the basis of statements of police witnesses who were posted as beat officers in the area on the date of the incident.

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Wednesday, September 22, dropped charges of arson against 10 people that the Delhi Police had accused of looting shops during the February 2020 riots, saying the police was trying to cover up a flaw and clubbing incidents of two different dates.

The case was registered on the basis of three complaints – one Birjpal had stated that his rented shop was looted by a riotous mob at Brijpuri road on February 25, while Diwan Singh claimed that two of his shops were looted on February 24.

Revoking arson charges, Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav noted the complainants did not state a single word regarding the riotous mob committing “mischief by fire or explosive substance” in their initial statements.

Diwan Singh, in his supplementary statement, stated however that the riotous mob put his shop on fire, to which the court said that the investigating agency cannot cover up the flaw by recording the supplementary statements if the offence of arson was not there in initial complaints made to the police.

Also read: ‘Casual, Callous, Farcical’: Delhi Court Fines, Raps Police Over Handling of Riots Case

The judge further said that arson charges cannot be invoked merely on the basis of statements of police witnesses who were posted as beat officers in the area on the date of the incident.

ASJ Yadav said that he is unable to comprehend how an incident that took place on February 24 can be clubbed with the incident which occurred on February 25 unless and until there is clear evidence that the same rioters were operating on both dates.

“In view of the aforesaid discussion, I am of the considered view that ingredients of Section 436 IPC [mischief by fire or explosive substance] are not at all made out from the material produced on record by the investigating agency,” the judge said.

The ten accused are Mohd Shahnawaz, Mohd Shoaib, Shahrukh, Rashid, Azad, Ashraf Ali, Parvez, Mohd Faizal, Rashid, Mohd Tahir.

The other sections invoked in the chargesheet such as Sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 188 (disobedience to order by public servant), 354 (assault), 392 (robbery), 427 (mischief), 452 (house trespass), 153-A (promoting disharmony on grounds of religion), 506 (criminal intimidation) are exclusively triable by a Magistrate, ASJ Yadav said.

He ordered for the case to be transferred to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.

This is not the first time that the Delhi Police has been hauled up by the courts for its investigation into the riots.

The Delhi high court in July had stayed the imposition of Rs 25,000 costs on the police in a case where a lower court had noted that investigation in case FIR No.64/2020 “has been done in a most casual, callous and farcical manner.” While the high court had stayed the fine, it had refused to interfere with the trial court’s strictures against its investigation.

The same ASJ Yadav had earlier observed that the Delhi Police’s senior officers have displayed a “complete lack of supervision” in investigation.

A Delhi court had also pointed to the Delhi Police’s laxity in investigating the burning of the Madina Mosque mosque during the riots. Earlier, ASJ Yadav had expressed dissatisfaction with Delhi Police for not having maintained files in connection with the probe into the desecration of the Masjid.

Delhi Riots: HC Stays Rs 25,000 Costs on Police, Refuses to Interfere With Trial Court Order

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav had pulled up the police and said that its investigation had been casual, callous, and farcical.

New Delhi: The Delhi high court on Wednesday, July 28, stayed the imposition of Rs 25,000 costs on the police in a case related to north-east Delhi riots but refused to interfere with the trial court’s strictures against its investigation at this stage.

“We can’t expunge the remarks without hearing you (Police). Costs may not be deposited till the next date of hearing,” said Justice Subramonium Prasad who was hearing Delhi Police’s challenge to a trial court order calling its investigation into the case callous and farcical, and imposing Rs 25,000 costs.

The trial court order was passed in a challenge to the magisterial court order that had directed Delhi Police to register an FIR on the complaint of one Mohammad Nasir, who has lost his left eye after suffering a gunshot injury during the riots.

On October 27, 2020, Metropolitan Magistrate Richa Manchanda had directed the Bhajanpura Police Station SHO to lodge a case against Nasir’s complaint – which he had pleaded that police were ignoring – within 24 hours of receiving the order.

This was challenged by the Delhi Police.

In his order on July 14, Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav had pulled up the police for lack of efficacy and fairness in the investigation in the case and said that it had been done in a most casual, callous, and farcical manner.

“Police have miserably failed in their statutory duties” in the case, he said, also noting that police had sought to create a “defence for the accused persons named in Nasir’s complaint”.

In his complaint, Nasir had mentioned that a mob led by Naresh Tyagi, Shubhash Tyagi, Uttam Tyagi and Sushil had perpetrated the injuries on him during the riots. A report by The Quint had established close links between the named and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

The high court on Wednesday issued notice on Delhi Police’s plea against the trial court order and sought response of the complainant, Nasir, in 10 days.

Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the police, said that at present, the main grievance was against the costs and the strictures. He also submitted that an FIR pertaining to the alleged incident had already been “thoroughly investigated and the accused was found to be not present at the spot at the relevant time.”

Also read: ‘Casual, Callous, Farcical’: Delhi Court Fines, Raps Police Over Handling of Riots Case

“All investigation will lead to one conclusion,” Raju said.

Advocate Mehmood Pracha, representing the complainant, claimed that the police’s stand was misleading and his client was under tremendous pressure to withdraw his pleas before court.

The matter will be heard next on September 13.

In its challenge to the trial court order, police said the imposition of fine, which was to be recovered from the station house officer (SHO) of Bhajanpura police station and his supervising officers, was unwarranted and uncalled for.

Filed through advocates Amit Mahajan and Rajat Nair, the plea argues that the July 13 order was in “violation of principles of natural justice as it was passed without giving any opportunity to the DCP to make his submissions, and that very serious remarks were made against the investigation even prior to the commencement of trial.”

Police had said there was no need to register a separate FIR on the basis of the complaint as it had already registered one earlier and there was no evidence against the persons who allegedly shot him as they were not present in Delhi at the time of the incident.

Judge Yadav had, significantly, noted how Section 307 of IPC (shooting with an intention to kill) and Section 25 of Arms Act had not been invoked while registering the FIR even though several people had received – in a fact acknowledged by the police – gunshot wounds.

The judge had also said that Mohammad Nasir was free to exhaust his remedies available to him in accordance with the law to get a separate FIR registered in respect of his complaint.

(With PTI inputs)

‘Casual, Callous, Farcical’: Delhi Court Fines, Raps Police Over Handling of Riots Case

The court said police had, in fact, sought to protect the accused while looking into a complaint lodged by a Muslim man who had been shot in his eye.

New Delhi: Not for the first time, a Delhi court has chastised Delhi Police over its handling of the February 2020 communal violence in the northeastern part of the city.

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav dismissed the Delhi Police’s revision petition against an October 2020 order of the court in which police had been directed to register an FIR based on one Mohammad Nasir’s complaint. Nasir had alleged that he had suffered a gunshot injury in his eye when rioters attacked him.

Judge Yadav has also imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on the Bhajanpura police station’s station house officer and his supervising officers and noted that “police have miserably failed in their statutory duties” in the case, reported Indian Express.

The Delhi court also says that police has sought to create a “defence for the accused persons named in Nasir’s complaint”.

The investigation in case FIR No.64/2020 “has been done in a most casual, callous and farcical manner,” the order, quoted by The Quint, reads.

The judge has also sent the order to the Delhi Commissioner of Police in order for him to note the lacunae in investigation and supervision on the matter and so that he can take remedial action.

The Delhi Police have faced several accusations of bias and complicity in the riots.

The complaint

In his complaint, Nasir had mentioned that a mob led by Naresh Tyagi, Shubhash Tyagi, Uttam Tyagi and Sushil had perpetrated the injuries on him during the riots. A report by The Quint had established close links between the named and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

“All the members of the mob were raising slogans of ‘Jai Shree Ram’ and were lighting fire on houses/shops of Muslims and were also attacking them with pistols and petrol bombs… After being shot when the complainant (Nasir) reached near his home, his father and brother saw him and got worried and called 100 number thrice in order to call for PCR (police control room) but the police department did not help them,” Nasir’s complaint, submitted on March 19, 2020, had alleged.

Also watch: Delhi 2020 | The Real Conspiracy, Episode 1: What the Delhi Police Chose Not to See

He had also informed the police that he was allegedly receiving death threats from Naresh over the complaint. On July 3, Nasir had sent a letter to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (north east) for protection under the Delhi Witness Protection Scheme, but alleged in court that he had received no help.

On October 27, 2020, Metropolitan Magistrate Richa Manchanda directed the Bhajanpura Police Station SHO to lodge the case within 24 hours of receiving the order and file a status report by November 25.

In court, police claimed that an FIR had already been filed noting that Nasir and six more people had suffered gunshot injuries and that no “evidence was found against the persons named by Nasir,” according to Indian Express. 

“The police also said Naresh and Uttam were not even present in Delhi at the relevant time and Sushil was present in his office,” the report notes.

Nasir, represented by advocate Mehmood Pracha, said that several offences spanning two days, February 24 and 25, had been clubbed in that FIR. The court, in its July 13, 2021, order also recognised this and noted that the alleged assault on Nasir took place on February 24 in North Ghonda while the other attacks took place on February 25 at Maujpur, and these could not be clubbed in the same FIR.

In April 2021, the same judge had observed that the Delhi Police’s senior officers have displayed a “complete lack of supervision” and that the practice of clubbing several FIRs into one has been used to “protect the accused” in the riots.

Judge Yadav also noted how Section 307 of IPC (shooting with an intention to kill) and Section 25 of Arms Act had not been invoked while registering the FIR even though several people had received – in a fact acknowledged by the police – gunshot wounds.

Judge Yadav also made note of the fact that the case diary mentions a lack of eye witness in Nasir’s case, even though the medico-legal case file clearly showed his address.

The court, according to The Quint, also said that Nasir, was ‘free to exhaust his remedies available to him in accordance with law” to get a separate FIR registered in respect to his complaint.

(With PTI inputs)

For Delhi’s Riot Victims, Ayodhya Event Saw Saffron Flags, Crackers – and Threats

Communal tensions are still high in the area that witnessed riots this February, the ‘bhoomi pujan’ has added to the fear and Muslim residents says the police has threatened them rather than been helpful.

New Delhi: It’s been a tense five months in North East Delhi. Residents are still trying to cope with the damage caused by the communal riots in February. Fifty-three people were killed, more than two-thirds of whom were Muslim. Given their behaviour during the violence and the manner in which they have conducted investigations since, there is little trust in the police, locally.

On August 5, the much-touted ‘bhoomi pujan‘ for the Ayodhya temple was held, attended by Bharatiya Janata Party and Sangh parivar leaders including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, governor Anandiben Patel, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat, Baba Ramdev, BJP national vice-president Uma Bharti and Ram temple trust president Nritya Gopal Das. The last two are facing trial for their role in the 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid.

The media hype ensured that the event led to celebrations in different parts of the country, as Sangh parivar activists and, in some places, ordinary Hindus lit diyas and burst crackers. A section of Hindus living in north-east Delhi’s Ghonda – an area with a mixed population of both Hindus and Muslims – also did the same, with many Hindu houses hoisting a saffron flag to celebrate the construction of a temple where the Babri Masjid once stood.

But once the day was over and night fell, saffron flags also cropped up at the entrances of the lane which has a mosque. Along with the flag, lane number 2 in Subhash Mohalla also witnessed “indecent” and “communally-charged” sloganeering, according to residents of the area. The lane, which was open before the Delhi riots in February, now has metal gates on either side for security. At least one person from Subhash Mohalla was killed during the riots, and several were injured.

“I was going to sleep when I heard some noise outside the house,” Anam*, a middle-aged homemaker who lives in lane number 2, told The Wire. When she went to her balcony, a cramped space which has been converted into storage for useless, broken items, she heard slogans being raised. “At around 1 am, a group of men were standing in our lane and shouting ‘Jai Shree Ram‘, ‘Mullon, bahar niklo (Mullahs – a derogatory word for Muslims – come out)’, ‘Desh ke gaddaron (Traitors of the nation)’.”

Also read: Why the HC Judgment Refusing to Quash ‘Pro Hindu’ Delhi Police Order is Flawed

That’s when she woke up her husband, Shahid*. “My husband was already scared of the violence; he had a narrow escape during Delhi riots. So he suggested that we should close our doors and go to sleep quietly. ‘Awaaz uthane ka koi faida nahin (There is no point raising our voice now),’ [Shahid said].”

Days later, Anam realised that what her husband said that night was, after all, true. This realisation came when she heard about an incident in north-east Delhi’s Bhajanpura police station on Saturday night.

‘They refused to register an FIR, beat us instead’

After deliberating with locals in the area about the incident, about seven women from Subhash Mohalla came together and decided to file a complaint on Saturday night. Among them were Shanno and her 17-year-old daughter. Shanno lives in lane number 1 of Subhash Mohalla with her husband, five daughters, two sons, two daughters-in-law and four grandsons. They have been living here for the past 32 years.

Shanno began to cry and she told The Wire about the incident on Sunday. She pointed at both her cheeks, alleging that she was slapped multiple times that night by policemen at Bhajanpura police station when she went to file an FIR. She also points to her left ear, which has been injured. “I don’t feel well. Those police officers beat us a lot,” she said. She alleged that male police officers mistreated the women, including her 17-year-old daughter. “Chaante-chaante barsaaye hum pe. Chhaati pe haath maar ke meri kameez phaadh di (They slapped me repeatedly. They put their hands on my chest and tore my kurta).”

Bringing up the saffron flags being put up in “Muslim” lanes, she says that communal tensions have built up in the area again. “Today, they have tied saffron flags near the mosque and burst crackers outside its gates, tomorrow they will do it inside the mosque if they go unpunished,” said Shanno.

A ‘conspiracy’ to force withdrawal of riot cases?

The irony of Shanno’s fate is that the Delhi high court had actually directed the police to ensure her safety.

On July 17, the high court directed the DCP of North East Delhi to protect Shanno and her family from any external threat. The order read, “This court considers it apposite to direct the petitioner (Shanno) to appear before respondent no. 3 (DCP, northeast Delhi) on 18.07.2020 at 10.30 am. The respondent no. 3 shall evaluate the threat perception and provide such security to the petitioner and her family as he considers warranted.”

Also read: How Delhi Police Turned Anti-CAA WhatsApp Group Chats Into Riots ‘Conspiracy’

A team of policemen was deployed for the family’s security and CCTV cameras were installed to keep an eye on any odd activity near Shanno’s house. The CCTV camera footage from the night of August 5, seen by The Wire, shows two young men tying a saffron flag on the gate of lane number 1.

Shanno and her husband Saleem are both eyewitnesses in cases pertaining to the Delhi riots, and recorded several videos on their phone of the violence. About two months after the riots, on April 18, Shanno lodged a complaint at Bhajanpura police station identifying several people from her own neighbourhood who had participated in the violence. The videos show people looting and burning shops, assaulting Muslims, pelting stones and making local bombs. She named several people including Chander, Daya Ram, Pappu, Bablu Goswami and others in her complaint.

Shanno after meeting the DCP, following the high court orders for protection to her family. Photo: Prabhjit Singh/Files

“We have been getting threats ever since we filed the complaint to withdraw it. I had made many videos in which rioters can be clearly seen committing acts of violence,” Shanno said. She especially recalls June 12, when her husband’s phone, on which the videos were shot, was stolen from him at gunpoint.

Saleem, Shanno’s husband, works in a shop that deals with old spare parts for vehicles. He and his elder son, who drives an e-rickshaw nearby, are the breadwinners for a family of 15. Saleem is undergoing treatment for heart disease.

Talking about how his phone was stolen, Saleem said, “I was going to Meena Bazar to buy some things for a wedding on June 12 on my scooter. When I was about to reach ISBT, I was suddenly stopped by a motorcycle. There were two people on it. One of them took out a pistol and touched it to my stomach and the other one asked me to take out my phone, the one which had videos of the riots, and give it to them. I lost my phone and some Rs 6,000 kept inside the phone cover. They also warned me and told me to keep my wife in check. ‘Bina wajah maare jaoge (You will be killed for no reason),’ they told me.”

On June 13, Saleem’s younger son and two grandsons met with an accident at around 11 pm, while coming back home. “It is not mere doubt, I know for sure that my son’s vehicle was targeted,” Saleem said. All three were injured and the youngest among them, Saleem’s grandson, was injured so badly that the doctors initially thought he might not make it. The three were first admitted to Holy Family Hospital near Okhla and then taken to AIIMS for further treatment.

“We are very scared, we cannot explain. We have to think twice before going out of the house, the entire family is under risk,” Saleem said.

On Sunday, Shanno went to Mohan Nursing Home and Hospital to get her ears checked.

‘Putting up saffron flags is not a crime’: SHO Bhajanpura

Ashok Sharma, who has recently taken over the post of station house officer (SHO), Bhajanpura said, “They had been given security from the high court, we have been following up on that. On August 5, the day of the bhoomi pujan, some people put up saffron flags in their lanes. Hindus and Muslims both live in this locality. They also burst crackers. Now they are asking us to take action against those people. This was a non-issue. When everybody in the nation is celebrating, lighting diyas and bursting crackers, what’s the issue?”

“It would have been a problem had it been done at their doorstep,” Sharma continued. “However, doing it in the lane is not a crime. Still, we asked them to file a complaint with us and they had come last night for the same at around 9 pm. Now, they started demanding an FIR and refused to leave the police station without it. I told them, this is not how an FIR is filed, we will conduct an investigation soon. Lighting diyas and putting up saffron flags is not a crime, is it?”

He also denied allegations of the station’s policemen mistreating the women.

Also read: Delhi Riots: Police Arrest 5 Based on One Confession, Register 4 Identical FIRs on One Incident

When The Wire reminded the SHO of the communally sensitive environment in north-east Delhi after the riots, he said, “That I agree with. But what is the point of seven-eight women coming to the police station at 11 pm? They are the ones instigating locals. I told Shannoji that the environment of the area will get spoiled because of this, you don’t have to fight elections, do you? Then why bring a group of women and push for an FIR?”

The SHO said that he is trying to solve the matter amicably between locals. “If there is an internal issue, we should sit with them and try to solve it then and there. We have to take care of all religions. On top of it, there is the coronavirus and all our attention is on it, 2020 is very sensitive for us. The police station is for all. We are taking care of the area [North East Delhi] but they should not create an issue out of every little thing, they should also not instigate others.”

Fired on in Delhi’s Communal Violence, Four Young Men Are Now the ‘Boys With the Bullets’

The youngest is 14. The oldest, 19. Between them, the four had dreams of running, playing cricket and earning enough for their families.

New Delhi: “You must be the trying to find the house of the boy with the bullet?”

We are standing behind the Aqsa Masjid in Mustafabad, one of north-east Delhi’s riot torn neighbourhoods, where the signs of the February violence are still visible in the rubble and the half-burnt exteriors of shops.

An elderly man asks us this question.

It is Eid and I had promised Sameer I would visit. After more than three months in hospital beds, he was returning home.  

On February 22, two days before the violence broke out, Sameer, barely 15, had given his math exam.

“I had dreams,” he recalls, “I would become an important man, an engineer, I would work abroad to earn.” On February 24, he was returning home for lunch from an ‘ijtema’ (religious gathering) at the Badi Masjid in Sadar Bazaar when he was hit by a bullet. 

Sameer was very close to his house when he saw “huge crowds” descend from the other side. “Before I knew what had happened, my knees buckled, I couldn’t breathe, my body just crumpled and fell.” He does not have to spell out that the ‘other side’ was where the Hindus were in a majority. 

He was carried by some bystanders to a small clinic nearby, “There was a lady doctor who tried to stop the blood but each bandage she applied would be soaked.” An odd detail still sticks to his memory, “I think I spoilt the clothes she was wearing.”

Also read: A Hindu-Owned Parking Garage, a Muslim-Owned Footwear Shop and a 2 km Stretch of Riot Hell

Now he is home. “No one thought I would survive, but here I am sitting up,” he says, greeting me with a radiant smile.

Sameer lies on a bed pushed against one side of the wall, in a white kurta, surrounded by his family – parents, two younger brothers and four sisters, all dressed for the festival. Zeba, at five the youngest, will not let go of his hands and wants to be photographed with her brother. His mother is ecstatic, “Eid is always festive but the joy I feel today, only Allah knows its extent.”

Sameer’s homecoming, three months after he was shot. With his mother and sisters on Eid. Photo: Radhika Bordia

And then a thought for a benefactor, “We are so grateful to Dr Mathew for allowing us to go home today.”

Dr Mathew Verghese is the Head of Department of Orthopaedics at St Stephen’s hospital in Old Delhi, where Sameer spent a month. 

For the first several days after being shot, Sameer was at the Guru Teg Bahadur hospital, the one closest to his home. He reached there with great difficulty after his father, Mohammad Zakir, was able to arrange an ambulance for him hours after he was shot.

He was rushed into surgery, which took a few hours. The bullet was removed but it had pierced his spine and paralysed him waist down. For thirty-six days he was on a ventilator. “There were tubes in my mouth, nose, throat and neck,” he recalls, “And specially in the early days I felt I could see my Abu’s face and my Ammi with tears in her eyes, but it all felt so hazy.”

Sameer was finally shifted to the general ward, “There was no life in my spine, my legs were numb but everything else hurt. It was only after an injection began being administered daily that the pain eased. Each injection cost Rs 3,000.”

The family had come to Delhi five years ago, from Bijnore in western Uttar Pradesh, in search of work and better education for the children. Living on meagre daily wages, each rupee was carefully tabulated and remembered, but they were determined to do all they could for Sameer. 

Also read: Delhi Violence: An Eyewitness Account From Jaffrabad

The parents took turns, spending a week each in hospital to ensure Sameer was not left unattended for a moment. “We don’t have much, just each other,” Sameer’s eldest sister says, as she feeds sewain to her brother. 

Lying in bed Sameer says he would often be despondent, “We had never harmed anyone, never complained of the little we had, so why did fate not let me reach home safely that day?” The smile on his face flickers off for a moment but returns as he adds, “I suppose I’m complaining now.”

Sameer with his mother and sisters. Photo: Radhika Bordia

In those long days of being totally bedridden, Sameer says he felt “angry even at my feet, I would look at them and try to will them to walk. I read the Quran, it gave me strength.”

Health volunteers and a disability rights activist who got to know him at the hospital felt Sameer needed more focused attention, and had him shifted to St Stephen’s hospital in Old Delhi. The physiotherapy there helped him. “Earlier all I could do was lie straight and stare at the ceiling for days on end,” he says, sitting up to show me how that’s changed.

According to Dr Mathew Verghese, an institution unto himself, the road ahead is still a tough one for Sameer. “I’m happy we’ve been able to get him standing, he can even take a few steps but as some groups of muscles still have paralysis, it’s too early to predict how normally he’ll walk,” he says.

What is of greater immediate concern for Dr Mathew is the loss of bladder functions, “Ideally I would not have liked to discharge Sameer with a catheter but ultimately weighing the cost benefits of the treatments this was the best option.”

So far, Dr Mathew had covered the cost of treatment but the expenses for what lies ahead on the road to recovery are still huge. A meagre Rs 20,000 is all the Delhi government has given as compensation. His father Mohammed Zakir, expressing gratitude for all those such as Dr Matthew who had already helped so much, says “First the violence, then the weeks at the hospital, now the lockdown, I haven’t been able to earn.”

Sameer with his five-year-old sister, Zeba. Photo: Radhika Bordia

In the midst of such concerns, the family has little room to worry about justice. The certificate from doctors at GTB would allow him to pursue a legal case but Irshad says, “I’m a daily wage labourer, my elder daughter and wife earn a little from tailoring, we work hard, the thana, kacheri (police station, court) is not for us.”

 When I do bring the conversation around to the violence they have experienced, there’s a long pause before Sameer’s mother answers, “We do not want to get into this Hindu-Muslim issue.”

Also read: Delhi Riots: Now, Only One Community Feels Safe Around Security Forces

His eldest sister interrupts her mother to say that the family avoids discussing the violence, “We will never forget it, how can we? I remember it each time I have to help my brother move even a little, the same person who would run up the steps, climbing them two at a time.”

Sameer turns to her and responds, “Don’t worry, give me a few days and I’ll outpace you again.”

The pensive mood is broken and the family returns to their festive cheer as I’m made to eat another bowl of sewain before I am allowed to leave.

Just five kilometres away in Maujpur, the Eid festivities are more subdued at Adnan’s home.

Adnan is 19, and he was the main earning member in the family, working at a small welding unit where Christmas decorations were manufactured. His story echoes what Sameer had related.

On the same day, a few hours after Sameer was hit, Adnan stepped out to fetch some medicines for his sister. He only realised he’d been hit by a bullet after his legs gave way and he fell in a pool of his own blood. 

“Most shops near us were closed so I walked to a market further away. There I saw large groups of men with tilaks and saffron gamchas, which is when I realised there was something amiss. I was about to enter a lane adjacent to a mosque when I heard people shouting, bricks flying around and gunshots.”

While every detail is vivid till this point, Adnan still struggles to remember what happened after he was shot. “I thought I’d stumbled and fallen. It was when I tried to get up, I realised I had lost control over my legs, then I saw the blood. A few men from my community picked me up.”

The bullet had pierced his thigh, shattering his femur, leaving a gaping flesh wound where it exited.

His younger brother, Vicky, was at home when a neighbour called to tell him his brother had been shot. “It seemed so far-fetched. I would have dismissed it as a joke but by then the news of the violence had spread.”

Adnan with his mother. Photo: Radhika Bordia

He recounts how he took his brother on his scooty, weaving his way through the bloody chaos of that night, pleading with the unrelenting police to let him take his dying brother to the hospital.

“GTB hospital is closest to us so we went there but they turned us away, told us to go to Safdarjung.” It took four hours at Safdarjung before Adnan was taken into surgery. He had lost a lot of blood and was coming in and out of consciousness. 

Vicky was alone with his brother through most of that night. Their father, after years of hard labour, was incapacitated by a hernia, their mother and their 18-year-old elder sister, were unable to step out of their homes. It was some hours before some friends and neighbours could arrive to help

“They told us we had to donate blood before any surgery or treatment could be done. We told them our friends and family were stuck in the violence, that we would donate blood later, but they wouldn’t listen,” says Vicky.

After a long surgery Adnan was discharged from Safdarjung but asked to return every three days to get his bandages changed. It was tough and expensive to follow this routine. Adnan, as he points to a large wound on one leg with skin grafted on it, says, “Initially a doctor handled it and he was meticulous but I feel the nurses would just rush through it, maybe that’s what gave me the infection.”

The past two months have been a battle against life-threatening infections, and the strong doses of antibiotics that have their own side-effects. Acute nausea and a total loss of appetite have left Adnan so weak that it’s an effort for him to sit up. He still has an external device holding his leg in place and it’s a constant struggle to fight off bed sores.

Also read: The Ideological Strategy Behind the Delhi Riots

At Safdarjung, doctors had told the family Adnan would be well and walking in six months but it seemed he was getting worse. Help came from a medical volunteer who took the family to Al-Shifa, a hospital in South Delhi that’s been treating many victims of the violence. The family had to relocate to an aunt’s house to be closer to the hospital.

In the 25 days, Adnan spent at Al-Shifa he had begun to recover from the infection and was doing well when the hospital discharged him due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Adnan needs to recover from the infection before he can have more surgeries but the lockdown has come in the way of his treatment. The thought that he may have trouble walking terrifies Adnan, “If I never walk again people will not know that it’s just sheer hatred and violence that’s done this to me.”

This is a fear all the boys I met share. The thought of a permanent disability is doubly debilitating in a country with little support for the disabled. Prime Minister Modi’s insistence on using the term ‘divyaang’ (divine body) for the disabled translates into little of practical value. 

For Adnan, the nights still bring terrifying nightmares, “I keep thinking if I had not taken those extra steps towards the crowds, I would have escaped the bullet, my family would not be suffering on my account.” He is tormented by what has happened, “We’re old enough to understand that relations between Hindus and Muslim have been damaged. Muslims are taunted in this country but we never thought it would come to this. If I thought Hindus would be violent, I would have never gone towards the Hindu mohallas to get the medicines.”

Neither of the brothers has been able to earn in the past three months. The family is yet to receive any compensation, surviving on donations from people. Gufran, a member of the Aman Biradari Trust which has been working in the riot areas, has been helping the family with rations and some monetary relief. 

Under  the circumstances, like Sameer’s family, they do not want to pursue the legal case, “Mahaul insaaf ka nahee hai (the climate is not right for justice).” All they want is for Adnan to be back on his legs.

Justice is too distant an idea for these families. Hoor Bano, the mother of 16-year-old Saif tells me over the phone, “Ever since Saif was hit by a bullet three months ago I have not been able to breathe properly, now when I see him alive, standing, walking I tell myself nothing else matters.”

In his neighbourhood, Saif is not just known as the boy hit by a bullet but the boy who carried a bullet in his body for two months. “Sometimes my friends seem so fascinated by the bullet,” he tells me, “They ask me questions as if I was some target board. Where did it hit you, what did it break? They forget that the bullet could have killed me.”

Also read: ‘Scared for Our Brothers’: Aali Village’s Hindus and Muslims Stand Shoulder to Shoulder

On February 25, Saif had accompanied his father Mohammad Irshad to their small tailoring shop in Kabir Nagar, less than a kilometre away from the spot where Adnan was shot. It wasn’t part of his usual routine but as there was no school that day – students were on exam leave – he went along.

When they reached Kabir Nagar, they realised the violence that they’d been hearing about had reached there. Saif, rushing ahead of his father, got swept up by the crowds, “I called out his name, a few minutes later I saw four men carrying a boy whose body was dripping blood at each step.”

Saif had been shot in the stomach by a bullet, which eye-witnesses say came from where a Hindu mob had assembled. In the midst of the violence, Saif’s father and uncle found their way to GTB hospital.

Saif, before the shooting. Photo: By special arrangement

“I could feel intense pain in my stomach and head, but I could not feel my legs. They were numb,” recalls Saif who had to wait from midday till six in the evening before being taken to the operation theatre. The surgery took five hours, the doctors said they’d managed to repair some of the nerve damage, Saif was out of immediate danger, but the bullet had not been taken out.

After 10 days Saif, quite inexplicably, was discharged with the bullet still lodged in his abdomen. The same doctors who said any sudden movement could endanger his life, also asked him to attend the orthopaedic OPD, which required a daily journey in an auto-rickshaw. 

Bringing Saif, still in pain, regularly to the hospital was difficult. Gufran, from Aman Biradri Trust who had also helped Adnan’s family, directed them to Al-Shifa hospital.

Saif was admitted there on March 16. A CT scan revealed the bullet had damaged the nerves and it had to be removed. Four days later he underwent a seven-hour surgery. “When Dr Nadeem emerged from the OT he told us the bullet was out. Saif would need to rest but after a while he would walk again. It was as if my own life forces had been restored,” says Hoor Bano. 

For Saif, it felt like a new lease of life, “I could not imagine life without walking, without playing cricket and had plunged into deep depression – at least that’s what people called it. It was a feeling I had not known.”

Also read: ‘We Burnt the Mazar Down’: Hindutva Men Talk About the Violence They Unleashed

Each of the boys had battled this fear, this depression and in each case the support of the family and the larger community had proved crucial, “I was angry, upset,” says Saif, “I had just given my Math’s board exams three days earlier and it had gone well. Questions rushed to my mind, why did the bullet find me, who was shooting, what was their aim, but my family would ask me not to think on those lines.”

The road to recovery was interrupted once again by the lockdown. On March 27, Saif was discharged from Al-Shifa, the family was told that, except for emergencies, hospitals were sending all other patients home. The regular physiotherapy so critical in his rehabilitation process came to an end.

The family tries to ensure Saif does some daily exercises. “Ammi does oil massage, Abbu makes him use the walker and I make him do some catching so that his cricket skills remain,” says Ashraf, Saif’s older brother. Saif still has a weakness in his leg and is unable to walk properly. But he dreams again, of wanting to become an engineer, of wanting to meet Virat Kohli, his cricketing hero. 

Saif, after he was shot. Photo: By special arrangement

His father, though, still battles his memories, “I wake up with a start in the middle of the night, rush to see if Saif is still breathing. Sometimes, I want to hit my head on the wall for taking Saif to the shop that day.”

His anxieties are worsened by what lies ahead. His shop has been shut since the day Saif was injured, “First it was the hadsa, the violence, then I was in hospital with Saif and now the lockdown, there has been simply no earning in three months.”

Apart from the initial Rs 20,000 that came as compensation, the family has been forced to live off donations. “I may not have secured large savings but I was always able to take care of the needs of my family, educate my boys. Now we have to take alms. And I still haven’t paid rent for four months,” says Zakir.

There is an FIR lodged at the Welcome police station but the family does not want to pursue the legal case, “People ask us if we want justice for what has happened to us and I tell them ‘insaaf kee nahee sochtey, karobar ki’ (I don’t dream of justice, I think of my livelihood).”

 “Insaaf  is a big word,” I remember 14-year-old Faizan telling me when I visited him at his home in Kardampuri, in the immediate aftermath of the violence, at the end of February. 

As I had enter the lane his house was on, a young girl, possibly in her early twenties, came to me and says:

“Are you looking for the Faizan who was killed or the Faizan who was shot?”

The Faizan who was killed lived two lanes away. A video shows him and four others being beaten by men in police uniforms. He died two days later.  The Faizan I was going to meet was also caught in the same violence. 

A steep flight of stairs led to Faizan’s one room house, where he lives with his older brother and his grandmother. Unaware of the violence that had reached his colony, Faizan had stepped out on February 24 to buy some rusks for his grandmother, when he was hit by a bullet fired by a Hindu mob. 

Also read: Delhi Riots: 14-Year-Old Boy Shot at in Kardam Puri in Stable Condition

Journalists from The Wire found him slumped over on the roadside, bleeding. 

Residents here claim ambulances were being blocked from reaching the injured. Faizan was rushed to the only option available that day, Dr Khaliq’s clinic. It was already packed with dozens of injured and seriously wounded people, “When Faizan was brought to my clinic there was blood pouring out of his stomach. I realised the bullet had hit close to his spine. All I could do was pressure bandage the wound to stop the bleeding.”

A bedridden Faizan with his grandmother, two weeks after he was shot. Photo: Radhika Bordia

Six hours later, Faizan made it to GTB hospital and is fortunate to have survived. The bullet was removed but it left Faizan unable to move. Bedridden in his house, Faizan’s deepest fear was of a life-long paralysis. The doctors had given him no information on what the future held for him, “All I pray for is to be able to stand and walk again so I can help my grandmother. My brother won’t be able to manage on his own.”

Faizan’s mother died when he was born. His father abandoned his two sons, remarried and moved to Rampur, leaving them in their widowed grandmother’s care.The two boys, the elder one just 16, help their grandmother in cutting threads from jeans which earned them up to Rs 100 a piece but the work stopped with the outbreak of the violence. And then there was the lockdown.

Almost three months later, when I returned to meet Faizan, he was sitting up. He smiled as he recognised me. He wanted to see the video I had taken of him that day. “Can you see I am better, I can sit up,” and pointed to a walker that a health activist had left for him, indicating he can walk a few steps.

Faizan’s grandmother wasn’t home that day, she’d gone out to try and see if she could avail of her pension. Money has been tight. 

Donations from people wanting to help and the Rs 20,000 compensation from the SDM is what they have managed on but there is little work now. The community has pitched in to help, the landlord has waived the rent but Faizan still needs regular physiotherapy, medical monitoring.

Also read: A Despatch From a Lifetime Reduced to Nought

The incident has made him quieter, says his brother. Faizan smiles when he hears this but doesn’t say much.

What he does tell me is that his fears have heightened – not just about his own condition but everything around him. He fears the police each time they come around to question him of the incident – the family again, like all the others I met does not want to pursue a legal case. 

Some of his other fears are even more constricting, “If I could get shot in the middle of large crowds just by chance, I feel if I step out I could get the coronavirus.”

Faizan, three months after the shooting, finally able to sit up. Photo: Radhika Bordia

It’s a fear that’s spread to his grandmother. “Everyone feels Faizan is safer at home.” It is what has made them reluctant to seek medical advice outside their neighbourhood, relying on Dr Khalil, the man who had first attended to Faizan for treatment. 

‘My dadi and my brother have attended to my every need. I want to be well to do something for them as well. That’s my only prayer. If I had a larger family, if Ammi was alive, there would be more people maybe to share the burden of looking after me,’ Faizan says, his voice trailing off.  

Faizan, Saif, Adnan and Sameer, four boys – young men – who have never met each other but whose lives have been linked by a tragedy they are trying to move beyond.

Each known in their neighbourhood by the same description, ‘the boy with the bullet’.

Muslim Youth Assaulted, Injured in Maujpur, NE Delhi, ITBP Deployed

The incident happened in the early hours of Sunday, when two brothers, both wearing skullcaps, were assaulted by a group of unidentified men shouting communal slurs.

New Delhi: Early on Sunday morning, Mohammed Adil and Mohammed Kamil from Shahadra’s Vijay Park had gone to buy medicine for Adil’s one month child, who has been unwell for the past few days. While returning, the petrol in their scooter got over and they found themselves stranded in north-east Delhi’s Maujpur. Adil, the younger of the two brothers, started dragging the scooter home while Kamil was walking some distance behind. 

“All the chemists here were closed, so we had to go to Jafrabad to get medicine,” Kamil told The Wire. “After buying the medicine, we were returning home when the scooty suddenly stopped because it had run out of petrol.”

When they reached the Maujpur-Babarpur Metro station, Kamil saw some people emerge from the “parking” area of a building.

“Suddenly, a group of men started attacking my brother. They were around 12-13 of them. This happened just under the Maujpur metro station. All of them seemed to be drunk. Our mistake was that we were both wearing skull-caps, due to Ramzan.” 

The men started abusing Adil, he alleged. “They were calling him Mulla, Katua (slangs used for Muslims), and asked him to say Jai Shri Ram. When he refused, they started beating him up.”  

The two brothers are daily wage earners whose work has stopped since the lockdown. While Kamil is a mechanic, Adil is an auto driver. 

The Indo-Tibetan Border Police was deployed in the area to defuse any tension, as north -east Delhi is a communally charged locality which saw nearly 60 people killed in violence only three months before. 

Since the February violence,  life has yet to come to normal for those who were affected. 

Adil is currently admitted in GTB hospital in Delhi. “He was not able to even walk. His ears and head were bleeding. Some passerby saw us in that condition and dropped us to the hospital,” he said. 

Their mother, Shehnaz, is a single parent and suffers from hypertension. Crying, she said, “I don’t know why this happened to my son. He is the most harmless person. He never wronged anybody. We want peace in this area. Even during Ramzan, such things are happening. It’s not right.” 

Kamil added, “First, we want peace in the area, and secondly, we want the culprits to get punished so that next time anybody thinks ten times before committing such a heinous crime.” 

A police official present in the area said, “The police force as well as ITBP has been deployed outside their residence. We want to assure them that there is nothing to worry about, and that they are safe. We will check the CCTV footage and identify the culprits.” 

However, there is still a sense of fear among his family members. 

Nasir, the victim’s younger brother broke down as he said, “We have been living in this locality for the past 20-25 years. I feel so scared suddenly. The area has not yet even recovered from Delhi riots, and now this has happened. My brother did nothing to be in the hospital at midnight. I don’t know what will happen to him. Were they animals?” 

Vijay Park, where the family lives, comes under the Bhajanpura police station. However, the locality where they were attacked comes under the jurisdiction of Jafrabad PS. 

Ved Prakash Surya, DCP (Northeast), has denied a communal angle in this. He said nobody was forced to chant anything, and this is a fight between two groups. “Since the Delhi riots, our forces have already been deployed in the area to maintain calm and peace,” he told The Wire. Right now, we are verifying the facts of the case. This is a fight between two groups. We will take legal action in the case as soon as we know more.”

This is a developing story.

Fix Blame on the Neros Who Fiddled While Delhi Burnt

Muscular governments never want to even re-examine their muscularity, lest it shows they are getting weak in the firmness of their purpose.

Whether Nero fiddled while Rome burnt is lost to controversy.

But two Neros can easily be identified in the Delhi incidents. They were Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump, who continued their optics and dined at a banquet in Rashtrapati Bhawan while Delhi burned.

I will return later to whether Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal was also a Nero.

Donald Trump and Narendra Modi. Photo: Reuters

These were the most formidable riots since the massacre of the Sikhs in 1984, the Bombay riots of the 1990s – and the Gujarat killings of 2002, for which many fingers were pointed at Modi who was then chief minister. Since then, we have had cow lynching cases, the murder of Muslims and Dalits and others, rape, and other heinous cases.

There was an all-India protest against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA).

One of the defining features of the Modi government has been to never relent, never engage on issues raised by its critics. Here, the Modi government had the option, given to it by parliament, to defer the date on which the Act would come into effect. But they did not do so even as a large part of India was in strong protest mode.

State legislatures have passed resolutions disagreeing with the CAA.

Also read: What Is Article 131, Under Which Kerala Has Challenged CAA?

This was a case where the Central government needed to engage the state governments and the protesters. But there was no dialogue, in keeping with the Modi government’s general aversion to this sort of engagement. Muscular governments never want to even re-examine their muscularity, lest it shows they are getting weak in the firmness of their purpose.

Whatever the reason, the Centre, over these long months, has abdicated its democratic duty to explain, listen, respond and engage with either the people or the concerns raised. If BJP leaders claim that they did so, it was only to make proud, declaratory statements to their supporters – as if to underline their view that they are never in the wrong. 

When an earlier warning was given in Jamia and New Friends Colony and buses and cars were burnt, it was also a time to engage and discuss. Instead, over several days, the burnt vehicles were left as monuments to the protesters’ folly.

A burning bus is seen after it was set on fire near Jamia on December 15, 2019. Photo: Reuters/Adnan Abidi

I am not defending the torching that took place. Protests should be non-violent but effective. 

Anger is a legitimate emotion in life and politics. It should not get out of hand. But if it does, was it also because of the obstinacy of the government to direct the blame away from them? A policy of ‘we are right and will not listen to you’ in times when democracy asserts itself is foolish.

Modi had a thumping majority in parliament till 2024 and could have continued his foreign travels as the Maharaja of India. But there were elections in the states through which his political conquest in India would be complete.

He and his colleagues felt that if the muscular policy of ‘no explanation and no compromise’ won them the 2019 general election, such a policy would take them to victory elsewhere too. If you feel that you are an elected dictator, your posture changes but not the rigidity of the mind.

It is important to remember that when the Anna movement took place, the Congress engaged with it as a result of which parliament passed a ‘sense of the house’ resolution. This was not compromise but part of democracy.

When British Prime Minister Boris Johnson suspended parliament, he was rapped on his knuckles by the populace and the apex court. In the present case, it was the Supreme Court – partly to blame for not hearing the CAA case immediatelythat sent interlocutors to Shaheen Bagh.

After the Delhi riots, when national security advisor Ajit Doval was sent to the field, he did not go there to hear the grievances of people against whom violent goons had been unleashed but to assess the security position, which was clearly a derivative problem.

The Delhi Police has much to answer for.

It is one of the best resourced police forces in India. Thousands of calls were made including those by Akali Dal MP Naresh Gujral. The SOS calls were ignored and few FIRs were filed.

Also watch | I Would’ve Arrested Anurag Thakur, Kapil Mishra: Ex Delhi Top Cop Ajay Raj Sharma on Riots

Former police commissioner Ajay Raj Sharma and other retired officers have openly said that the police moved too late, too ineffectively. One policeman died and many were injured. On the civil, side there were at least 50 dead and hundreds injured. The number of those forced to flee their homes and seek refuge elsewhere is in four figures.

One grieves for all of those who died.

Delhi’s police is run by a commissioner system with greater power to the commissioner. The police come under the Union home ministry, headed by Amit Shah.

Even if we accept the untruth that the home minister does not interfere except in policy matters, surely there were policy issues that were involved. What was lieutenant governor Anil Baijal doing? After the Aam Aadmi Party government won its case of 2016, the LG had enough space to move the Centre towards an even handed policy. But he did nothing.

Kejriwal, who won a great victory in the recent assembly elections, also has much to answer for.

By going to Rajghat, did he think Gandhi would descend to help? Kejriwal did not provide for dialogue, proper shelters, treatment and immediacy.

We need a Justice Srikrishna inquiry now.

Rajeev Dhavan is a senior advocate.

Media Collective Expresses Concern Over Attacks on Journalists Since Passing of CAA

In the days since the protests began against the CAA to the Delhi riots, media persons have been shot, beaten, heckled, arrested and harassed.

New Delhi: A collective of independent media and civil society groups has raised concerns over the recent attacks on journalists while reporting on the widespread protests and citizens’ movements that took place since the passing of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). 

The report titled ‘Republic in Peril’ details accounts of 32 journalists who were attacked while they were reporting between December 2019 when the anti-CAA protests began and February when the Delhi riots took place. 

The report divides the attacks into three phases – the first when the anti-CAA protests began in December, followed by the phase in January beginning with the attack on journalists around the JNU campus and the third phase, during the Delhi riots. 

“The report observes these three phases in continuity. The first spate of attacks by the state and non-state actors was a testing ground that builds up into a full-fledged consolidated attack on Press during Delhi violence in the last week of February,” the report said. 

Also read: Delhi Riots: Proactive Policy Needed to Protect Journalists, Media Rights Body Says

It lists accounts of seven journalists in the first phase in which journalists from Zee News, BBC and Asianet News and others were attacked when they were covering the anti CAA protests. 

Bushra Sheikh, a journalist with the BBC, was attacked by the police in South Delhi. “A male cop pulled her hair, hurled abuses and hit her with a baton,” the report said. 

In the second phase which the report evaluates, there were cases of seven attacks on journalists. Most of them were attacked either inside or outside JNU when they were covering protests or the violence that broke out in the campus. 

Ayush Tiwari of Newslaundry was confronted by a mob outside the JNU campus on January 5 and asked to chant ‘Bharat mata ki jai’. 

Also read: ‘Watched Crowds Swell Around Him Live on TV,’ Says Father of Journalist Who Was Shot

In the third phase, during the Delhi riots, the report details 14 cases of attacks. All the attacks took place on February 24 and 25 when the violence in north east Delhi, in which at least 53 people lost their lives, was at its peak. A journalist, Akash Napa, who works with JKx24 was shot by a mob. 

In a separate list of journalists attacked in places other than Delhi, the report details 15 cases including cases where security personnel attacked journalists clicking pictures in Srinagar. 

Delhi Minorities Commission: Violence ‘One-Sided’, Thousands Fled to Native Villages

The report is based on the visit of Delhi Minorities Commission (DMC) chairman Zafarul Islam Khan and member Kartar Singh Kochhar to the violence-affected areas.

New Delhi: A report of the Delhi Minorities Commission on the riots in northeast Delhi has claimed that thousands of people have fled the city to their native villages in Uttar Pradesh and Haryana, and that the violence was “one-sided and well planned”.

The report is based on the visit of Delhi Minorities Commission (DMC) chairman Zafarul Islam Khan and member Kartar Singh Kochhar to the violence-affected areas.

Riots broke out between pro and anti-Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) groups in the northeastern part of the city last week. The violence then spread to nearby localities of Maujpur, Chand Bagh and Yamuna Vihar. The protesters roamed in streets brandishing swords and pistols and even torched vehicles and houses.

Forty-four people have died and more than 200 injured in the violence.

The report by the Delhi Minorities Commission claimed that the violence was “one-sided and well planned” in which “maximum” damage was inflicted on houses and shops of Muslims.

“Moreover, thousands of people have fled from the area and gone to their villages in Uttar Pradesh and Haryana or were living with relatives elsewhere in Delhi. Hundreds are still living in camps run by the community. Some are also living in camps run by the Delhi government,” it said.

Also Read: ‘They Took Down Their Pants, Pointed Their Genitals at Us, and Said, ‘Yeh Lo Azaadi”

Khan said the DMC team visited many areas in northeast Delhi and witnessed extensive damage to houses, shops, schools and vehicles.

“It is our assessment that the violence in the northeast district of Delhi was one-sided and well planned in which maximum damage was inflicted on Muslim houses and shops with local support,” read the report.

“Without massive help, these people will not be able to rebuild their lives. We feel that the compensation announced by Delhi government is not adequate for the purpose,” it said.

The Delhi Minorities Commission is a statutory body set up under the Delhi Minorities Commission Act, 1999.

Khan said the team visited various localities, including Chand Bagh, Jafrabad, Brijpuri, Gokalpuri, Mustafabad, Shiv Vihar, Yamuna Vihar, Bhajanpura and Khajuri Khas.

“We found extensive damage to Muslim houses, shops and workshops everywhere we went,” the report added.

The DMC team also met senior police officers who told the Commission that hundreds of people stranded in the violence were rescued by the police.

Delhi Riots: After Videos of Mobs Attacking Cops Surface, Police to Identify Those Involved

The police claim the videos were recorded on February 24.

New Delhi: After videos surfaced on social media showing DCP Shahdara and his team being attacked in Chand Bagh area during the recent communal violence in northeast Delhi, the police on Thursday said they are trying to identify those involved in the incident.

The videos were recorded on February 24, they said.

In one of the videos, a mob could be seen attacking DCP Shahdara Amit Sharma and his team on the main road in Chand Bagh area. The mob was seen indulging in heavy stone-pelting at the police team as it moved towards them.

The DCP sustained severe injuries during the attack and fell unconscious after he was attacked by the mob, while his personnel tried to rescue him, the video showed.

Also read: Delhi Riots: Mosques and Huts Burned, Children Attacked, at Least 2 Dead in Mustafabad

In another video that surfaced on social media, a few police personnel including ACP Gokulpuri Anuj Sharma can be seen dragging the severely injured DCP Amit Sharma towards the side lane as he fell unconscious. However, a few men who were part of the mob continued to pelt stones at the police personnel who were trying to rescue Sharma through another lane.

The DCP was admitted to Max Hospital, Patparganj, where he underwent a surgery. He was discharged from hospital on Wednesday.

ACP Gokulpuri was also injured in the same incident while Head Constable Ratan Lal was killed.

A senior police officer said they have taken note of the videos and are trying to identify those who were part of the mob.