An official quoted by ‘Economic Times’ said Apple’s 2021 move to begin iPad production in India suffered due a lack of approval from Indian authorities because the vendor was a wholly owned Chinese firm.
New Delhi: Tech giant Apple “has no plans to start manufacturing” iPads and Mac computers in India, Economic Times has reported, quoting insiders, who also said that its move to begin iPad production suffered due a lack of approval from Indian authorities because the vendor was a wholly owned Chinese firm.
Apple, however, is looking to making AirPods – popular listening devices – in the country.
The report comes amidst growing talk on Apple possibly making India its next production hub, although a Financial Times report in February this year had noted how the company is hitting stumbling blocks in India.
During his highly publicised visit to India in April, Apple Inc Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and committed to growth and investment across India.
He also inaugurated Apple’s first retail store in the country in Mumbai.
The insider ET spoke to said that during the visit, Cook did not particularly discuss the finer aspects of Apple’s manufacturing hopes in India, but said that so far making Mac computers has not been discussed.
The official did not speak about iPhones.
The outlook is negative for iPads too, in which Apple had made efforts to shift manufacturing to India in 2021, another official said. But since the vendor was a wholly owned Chinese firm, Apple failed to get Indian government approvals and moved to Vietnam instead last year, the official said. India does not allow participation of Chinese firms who are not in a joint venture with Indian entities.
The market share of iPhones has hovered in the low single digits in India for years, but now there is finally hope for Indian Apple aficionados.
The market share of iPhones has hovered in the low single digits in India for years, but now there is finally hope for Indian Apple aficionados and the company to fill more Indian pockets with the smartphone. Apple reports its quarterly figures Wednesday, and they are expected to have shown a nice increase in India sales. According to analysts Counterpoint Research, Apple has shipped 3.2 million iPhones in India in the past year, majorly growing its distribution from just 1.7 million in 2018.
Apple made the 60% jump between 2019 and 2020 with the help of its first Indian online store opened last year. Physical stores are to follow, according to the company. Previously, Apple could not sell directly in India, but has gained that privilege by opening up its own production in the country in late 2019. The move also enabled Apple to circumvent India’s hefty import fees, making the iPhone more affordable.
Still, price will stay a prohibiting factor for the iPhone’s success in India. More affordable Chinese brands like Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo are hugely popular in the country. Chinese premium brands like OnePlus also managed to divert buyers from the iPhone, partly explaining the 2018 drop in iPhone sales. As iPhones are getting more expensive in general, barriers to the Indian market will remain.
The report from the antitrust panel of the House Judiciary Committee laid out a roadmap for the Democratic Party to put the brakes on the dominance of
Google, Apple, Amazon and Facebook.
Washington: A scathing report detailing abuses of market power by four top technology companies suggests a tough road ahead of new rules and stricter enforcement for Big Tech should Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden win the White House.
Antitrust experts and congressional aides said the 449-page report from the antitrust panel of the House Judiciary Committee, released on Tuesday, lays out a roadmap for the Democratic Party to put the brakes on the dominance of Alphabet Inc’s Google, Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook Inc.
The election on November 3, 2020, approaching fast and a new Congress scheduled to be sworn in in January, action on the report‘s recommendations this year is unlikely and no new legislative changes are imminent. However, the findings boost the chances for new laws in the future and will inform existing investigations against large technology companies by state attorneys general and agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission.
The report reflects the views of Democrats on the antitrust subcommittee in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives. Republicans on the panel released two separate reports on the investigation.
US Representative David Cicilline, chairman of the House antitrust panel, told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday he thinks a Biden administration would be receptive to the report. “He (Biden) has talked about how Big Tech platforms abuse their power,” said Cicilline, a Rhode Island Democrat. “He recognizes that this sort of economic concentration undermines democracy.”
Sarah Miller, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, a Washington-based group focused on monopoly power, said the report “lays out the Democratic Party’s position on tech platforms and how antitrust laws need to be refined and strengthened.”
“The report has done a lot of work to set up where and why a Biden administration should act and how it should prioritize the recommendations in the report,” she added. Miller is one of the hundreds of members of the Biden campaign’s tech policy committee.
William Kovacic, a former chair of the Federal Trade Commission, warned that the companies will “pull out all the stops” in lobbying against the changes.
Earlier this month, Reutersreported how large tech companies including Amazon were cozying up to the Biden campaign with cash and connections.
Biden has previously said antitrust enforcement has not been strong and that tech firms deserve a hard look from the federal agencies that oversee the competition. He has stayed away from calling for the breakup of large technology companies, saying it would be premature to do so without a formal investigation.
The House report on Tuesday broadly recommended that companies should not both control and compete in related businesses, but stopped short of naming a specific company. Anti-monopoly experts and congressional aides said the report, which details Big Tech‘s abuses, has the potential to influence the thinking of Biden on the issue.
A spokesman for the Biden campaign did not immediately comment.
The antitrust panel will take up the majority report after the October recess for formal adoption and will have a vote on it, counsels for the committee said. The next step will be coming up with legislation to put the report‘s recommendations into action.
House panel chairman Cicilline also said in the interview he expects legislation tackling Big Tech‘s market power to be introduced in the current Congress and more bills to be introduced next year.
Apple now accounts for close to 7% of the S&P 500’s total market value. Its market capitalisation is about equal to the combined values of the S&P 500’s 200 smallest companies.
Just two years after Apple became the first publicly listed US company with a $1 trillion stock market value, the iPhone maker has now topped $2 trillion.
The Cupertino, California-based company’s shares briefly rose to as high as $468.65 on Wednesday, equivalent to a market capitalisation of $2.004 trillion. The stock was last up 1.2% at $467.62, giving Apple a market capitalisation of $1.999 trillion.
Apple’s market cap breaches $2 trillion. Photo: Reuters
Buoyed by bets on the long-term success of the country’s biggest tech names in a post-coronavirus world, Apple’s shares have surged since blowout quarterly results in July that saw the iPhone maker eclipse Saudi Aramco as the world’s most valuable listed company. Apple’s stock is up about 57% so far in 2020.
The rally reflects growing investor confidence in Apple’s shift toward relying less on sales of iPhones and more on services for its users, including video, music and games.
Apple now accounts for close to 7% of the S&P 500’s total market value. Its market capitalisation is about equal to the combined values of the S&P 500’s 200 smallest companies.
However, Apple’s recent stock rally has left it potentially overvalued, according to a widely used metric. The stock is trading at over 30 times analysts’ expected earnings, its highest level in more than a decade, according to Refinitiv.
Microsoft and Amazon follow Apple as the most valuable publicly traded U.S. companies, each at about $1.6 trillion. They are followed by Google-owner Alphabet, at just over $1 trillion.
Those and other heavyweight technology companies have surged to record highs during the coronavirus pandemic as consumers rely more on e-commerce, video streaming and other services they provide. Investors are betting these companies will emerge from the pandemic stronger than smaller competitors, with some even viewing their volatile shares as safe havens.
Apple’s revenue grew across every category and all of its geographical regions in the June quarter, even as the coronavirus crisis caused the U.S. economy to contract at its worst rate since the Great Depression.
Apple surprised Wall Street as it was able to get loyal shoppers to buy iPhones, iPads and Macs online even as several brick-and-mortar stores remained closed due to the coronavirus lockdowns.
Started in the garage of co-founder Steve Jobs in 1976, Apple has pushed its revenue beyond the economic outputs of Portugal, Peru and other countries.
Chief executive officer incumbent Tim Cook took over from Jobs in 2011 and has more than doubled Apple’s revenue and profits under his leadership.
The iPhone maker is slated to split its stock four-for-one when trading opens on Aug. 31, with the company saying it aims to make its shares more accessible to individual investors.
Bezos escaped questioning for about an hour in what may have been a tech issue and was caught on screen reaching for what appeared to be a snack.
Washington: Google and Facebook took the sharpest jabs for alleged abuse of their market power from Democrats and Republicans on Wednesday in a much-anticipated congressional hearing that put four of the US’s most prominent tech CEOs in the hot seat.
Facebook Inc’s Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon.com Inc’s Jeff Bezos, Google owner Alphabet Inc’s Sundar Pichai and Apple Inc’s Tim Cook – whose companies have a combined market value of about $5 trillion – parried a range of accusations from lawmakers that they crippled smaller rivals in the quest for market share, via a videoconference hearing.
Though it was Bezos’ first congressional testimony, he appeared the least fazed. Cook drew fewer barbed questions than Bezos and handled them efficiently. Zuckerberg took the most damage, stumbling at times when confronted with internal emails.
Pichai, CEO of both Alphabet and Google, took the most heat from conservatives on the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel and looked the worse for it, as he repeatedly told lawmakers he would be happy to look into various situations and get back to them.
Unfortunately, the Big Tech hearing was decidedly low-tech. Bezos escaped questioning for about an hour in what may have been a tech issue and was caught on screen reaching for what appeared to be a snack.
Poor audio, flat-screen televisions switching off and chief executives appearing together as thumbnails on a large screen frustrated viewers and led to mockery of the virtual set-up on Twitter.
Lawmakers descended into shouting at points, with a pandemic twist. One lawmaker shouted: “Put your mask on!”
Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos testifies as U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook listen during a U.S. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law hearing on “Online Platforms and Market Power” in this screengrab as the committee meets on Capitol Hill, in Washington, U.S. on July 29, 2020. U.S. House Judiciary Committee via Reuters
Representative David Cicilline, a Democrat and chair of the antitrust subcommittee, set the tone when he began by accusing Google of theft.
“Why does Google steal content from honest businesses?” he asked.
Cicilline alleged Google stole reviews from Yelp Inc and said Google threatened to delist Yelp from search results if it objected.
Pichai responded mildly that he would want to know the specifics of the accusation. “We conduct ourselves to the highest standards,” he added, disagreeing with the characterization that Google steals content to win users.
Facebook’s Zuckerberg took a series of questions about the company’s purchase of Instagram in 2012 and whether it was acquired because it was a threat.
Zuckerberg responded that the deal had been reviewed by the Federal Trade Commission and that Instagram at the time was a tiny photo-sharing app rather than a social-media phenomenon. “People didn’t think of them competing with us in that space,” he said.
In one of the more notable exchanges, Representative Pramila Jayapal pushed Zuckerberg on whether Facebook had ever copied its competitors.
“We’ve certainly adapted features that others have led in,” he said.
“How many companies did Facebook end up copying?” she asked. “Is it less than five? Less than 50?”
“Congresswoman, I don’t know,” Zuckerberg said.
The hearing was the first time the four CEOs have appeared together before lawmakers.
Jayapal pressed Amazon’s Bezos on whether the company used data from third-party sellers in making sales decisions. An Amazon executive previously had denied the practice under oath and was contradicted by a news report.
Bezos answered cautiously that the company had a policy against such actions. “If we found that somebody violated it, we would take action against them,” he said.
On the Republican side, Representative Jim Jordan accused the companies of taking a long list of actions that he said showed they try to hamper conservatives from reaching their supporters.
“Big Tech is out to get conservatives,” he said.
Jordan’s allegations come after President Donald Trump, who has clashed with several of the biggest tech companies, on Wednesday threatened to take action against them with executive orders.
Jordan also pressed Pichai on whether Google would help former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, win in November.
“We support both campaigns. We approach our work in a nonpartisan fashion,” Pichai responded.
Republican Representative Matt Gaetz pressed Facebook’s Zuckerberg on whether content moderators disadvantaged conservative content.
Zuckerberg said they were trained to be neutral. “We aim to be a platform for all ideas,” he said. “I certainly don’t want our platform to be run in such a way to have a … bias.”
‘Street fight’
Apple’s Cook rejected the notion there is nothing to stop his company from raising the commissions it charges in the App Store.
“I disagree strongly with that,” he said. “The competition for developers – they can write their apps for Android or Windows or Xbox or PlayStation. We have fierce competition at the developer side and the customer side, which is essentially so competitive I would describe it as a street fight.”
A detailed report with antitrust allegations against the four tech platforms and recommendations on how to tame their market power could be released by late summer or early fall by the committee, senior committee aides said.
Software developed by two of the world’s biggest tech giants will allow users to log other phones they have been physically close to.
Tech giants Apple and Google said on Friday that they will be collaborating to work on contact tracing technology, to slow down the spread of the coronavirus. This will allow users to opt in to logging other phones they have been in proximity to.
To help public health officials slow the spread of #COVID19, Google & @Apple are working on a contact tracing approach designed with strong controls and protections for user privacy. @tim_cook and I are committed to working together on these efforts.https://t.co/T0j88YBcFu
Contact tracing can help slow the spread of COVID-19 and can be done without compromising user privacy. We’re working with @sundarpichai & @Google to help health officials harness Bluetooth technology in a way that also respects transparency & consent. https://t.co/94XlbmaGZV
Apple and Google operating systems are used in 99% of the world’s smartphones. The contact tracing tool will help people with their smartphones to determine whether they have been close to anyone who has the virus.
“It’s very interesting, but a lot of people worry about it in terms of a person’s freedom. We’re going to take a look at that, a very strong look at that,” said US President Donald Trump about the initiative, in a press briefing.
This would help public health authorities get potentially exposed individuals tested and quarantined in a faster and more reliable manner than currently possible.
Users’ phones with the technology enabled would emit Bluetooth signals. Phones within about six feet can record anonymous information about encounters. Both the companies said that the personal data or GPS location of infected individuals would not be tracked by them.
Stanford University lecturer and former external counsel to Google, Al Gidari told Reuters: “This isn’t a substitute for testing — you need to know who has it — but it produces actionable results so people can act responsibly, self-isolate and reduce anxiety in the community as a whole.”
The software is expected to be rolled out in May. It is unclear whether the technology would be internationally available. Google will launch it through their Play Store, whereas Apple will release it as a software update.
Privacy concerns
Similar apps, rolled out in different countries have attracted the attention of privacy advocates.
However, Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum, told the Associated Press she had been reassured by Apple that it would protect people’s privacy.
“I think they’ve taken care of some of the really big problems,” Dixon said, noting the companies say they can turn off the system
when it’s no longer needed. “The government is not going to have identity information of those testing positive.”
Sensitive information will reportedly stay on individual phones in encrypted form, no personally identifiable data will be collected, and
alerts would be handled by public health agencies, not the tech companies, according to briefing paper seen by The Associated Press.
The article first appeared on DW. Read the original here.
Narendra Modi is expected to meet with US President Donald Trump to discuss “strategically important issues”, and hold interactions with the Indian-American community and 20 leading US CEOs.
Prime Minister Modi is expected to meet with US President Donald Trump to discuss “strategically important issues”, and hold interactions with the Indian-American community and 20 leading US CEOs.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the International Economic Forum earlier this month. Credit: Reuters/Mikhail Metzel
Washington: Prime Minister Narendra Modi today arrived at Washington on the second leg of his three-nation tour after a day-long working visit to Portugal in the first ever bilateral visit by an Indian PM to the European nation. He will have his first bilateral meeting with US President Donald Trump, as the two leaders are set to hold discussions on a set of “strategically important” issues.
Just hours before Modi landed in Washington, Trump tweeted from his official Twitter handle POTUS, an acronym for President of the US, that he is looking forward to welcome the Indian leader to the White House, during which he will discus “important strategic issues” with a “true friend”.
US Senator Kamala Harris also tweeted that she welcomes “Indian PM @NarendraModi to the United States and reaffirm the unbreakable bonds between our two nations.”
The Trump administration said it is rolling out the “red carpet” for Modi, to emphasise that the US is ignoring or not focusing on India.
“President Trump realises that India is a force for good and that will come through in the visit on Monday,” a senior official said.
Trump will host Modi at the White House on Monday afternoon and the two leaders would spend about five hours together in various settings beginning with their bilateral discussion, delegation level talks, a reception and a working dinner, the first of its kind hosted by this administration.
The two leaders will not address a press conference but will issue individual press statements.
A host of strategic issues are expected to be discussed during the bilateral talks between the two leaders of the world’s largest democracies, including defence cooperation, boosting economic ties, discussions on the civil nuclear deal, cooperation on combating terrorism, security cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region and India’s concerns over the H-1B work visa.
Earlier, a senior administration official said the visit is an opportunity to strengthen the US-India strategic partnership, which Trump very much views as a critical partnership in promoting stability and security in the Asia Pacific region and globally.
“We anticipate that their discussions will be broad- ranging, hitting on a variety of regional and global issues that would seek to advance our common priorities, including fighting terrorism, promoting economic growth and prosperity,” the official said, briefing reporters at the White House.
The PM will also interact with about 20 leading American CEOs followed by an Indian-American community event in the DC suburb of Virginia. The programme is likely to be attended by about 600 members of the community.
American CEOs expected to meet Modi include Apple’s Tim Cook, Walmart’s Doug McMillon, Caterpillar’s Jim Umpleby, Google’s Sundar Pichai and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella.
Insisting on the glamour and fun of coding plants the pernicious notion in the heads of children that they do not need discipline in order to progress.
Insisting on the glamour and fun of coding plants the pernicious notion in the heads of children that they do not need discipline in order to progress.
Credit: Michael/Flickr
Programming computers is a piece of cake. Or so the world’s digital-skills gurus would have us believe. From the non-profit Code.org’s promise that ‘Anybody can learn!’ to Apple chief executive Tim Cook’s comment that writing code is ‘fun and interactive’, the art and science of making software is now as accessible as the alphabet.
Unfortunately, this rosy portrait bears no relation to reality. For starters, the profile of a programmer’s mind is pretty uncommon. As well as being highly analytical and creative, software developers need almost superhuman focus to manage the complexity of their tasks. Manic attention to detail is a must; slovenliness is verboten. Attaining this level of concentration requires a state of mind called being ‘in the flow’, a quasi-symbiotic relationship between human and machine that improves performance and motivation.
Coding isn’t the only job that demands intense focus. But you’d never hear someone say that brain surgery is ‘fun’ or that structural engineering is ‘easy’. When it comes to programming, why do policymakers and technologists pretend otherwise? For one, it helps lure people to the field at a time when software (in the words of the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen) is ‘eating the world’ – and so, by expanding the labour pool, keeps industry ticking over and wages under control. Another reason is that the very word ‘coding’ sounds routine and repetitive, as though there’s some sort of key that developers apply by rote to crack any given problem. It doesn’t help that Hollywood has cast the ‘coder’ as a socially challenged, type-first-think-later hacker, inevitably white and male, with the power to thwart the Nazis or penetrate the CIA.
Coding by a web developer. Credit: Pixabay
Insisting on the glamour and fun of coding is the wrong way to acquaint kids with computer science. It insults their intelligence and plants the pernicious notion in their heads that you don’t need discipline in order to progress. As anyone with even minimal exposure to making software knows, behind a minute of typing lies an hour of study.
It’s better to admit that coding is complicated, technically and ethically. Computers, at the moment, can only execute orders, to varying degrees of sophistication. So it’s up to the developer to be clear: the machine does what you say, not what you mean. More and more ‘decisions’ are being entrusted to software, including life-or-death ones: think self-driving cars; think semi-autonomous weapons; think Facebook and Google making inferences about your marital, psychological or physical status, before selling it to the highest bidder. Yet it’s rarely in the interests of companies and governments to encourage us to probe what’s going on beneath these processes.
All of these scenarios are built on exquisitely technical foundations. But we can’t respond to them by answering exclusively technical questions. Programming is not a detail that can be left to ‘technicians’ under the false pretence that their choices will be ‘scientifically neutral’. Societies are too complex: the algorithmic is political. Automation has already dealt a blow to the job security of low-skilled workers in factories and warehouses around the world. White-collar workers are next in line. The digital giants of today run on a fraction of the employees of the industrial giants of yesterday, so the irony of encouraging more people to work as programmers is that they are slowly mobilising themselves out of jobs.
In an ever-more intricate and connected world, where software plays a larger and larger role in everyday life, it’s irresponsible to speak of coding as a lightweight activity. Software is not simply lines of code, nor is it blandly technical. In just a few years, understanding programming will be an indispensable part of active citizenship. The idea that coding offers an non-problematic path to social progress and personal enhancement works to the advantage of the growing techno-plutocracy that’s insulating itself behind its own technology.
Walter Vannini is a digital consultant and researcher. He is interested in IT culture against technocrats and data governance, and is based in Milan, Italy.
The Apple CEO’s goal could also be about demystifying the company while making it more accessible to the government, the country’s tech ecosystem and Indian consumers.
The Apple CEO’s goal could also be about demystifying the company while making it more accessible to the government, the country’s tech ecosystem and Indian consumers.
Apple CEO Tim Cook. Credit: Mike Deerkowski/Flick CC 2.0
New Delhi: If one goes by the media blitz surrounding Tim Cook’s India visit, the Apple CEO is a man on a mission.
The company reportedly plans on clinching a deal with the Maharashtra government to set up a massive iPhone manufacturing plant, laying the ground-work for three new Apple stores in various metros, grappling with government officials over the setback to its iPhone refurbishment strategy, inaugurating a new development centre in Hyderabad, launching a start-up accelerator and nudging India’s telecom titans into speeding up their 4G-LTE rollout plans.
And oh, he’s probably going to want to squeeze in a little time for sightseeing too.
Apple’s focus on India, which has always been explicitly referred to in the company’s quarterly earnings conference calls over the last five years but never followed up seriously in terms of action until now, has been a topic of debate over the past few months. The general consensus is that with the China region slowly hitting a saturation point (especially when it comes to upgrade cycles), Apple is hoping that India will naturally become its next biggest source of growth. Unfortunately for Apple, not only does India look a bit like how China did in 2005 in terms of GDP per capita, it also currently has a lot fewer people who can afford an iPhone when compared to China.
Which brings us back to Cook’s visit to India. Let’s address the company’s objectives one by one. Firstly, Apple’s run-ins with the government (both positive and negative), which are solid aspects of the company’s India charm offensive, and which desperately require resolution and Cook’s attention.
Government run-ins
The company’s refurbishment strategy was its way of retaining high margins while selling more iPhones to Indian consumers. The plan was simple: Take the iPhones that American consumers trade-in every year as they upgrade to newer models, refurbish those phones, and then ship them off to developing markets where they can be sold at a cheaper place.
Unfortunately for Apple, the telecom ministry threw a wrench in these plans. There are two possible reasons for the rejection of Apple’s proposal, both of which are not overly convincing. The first, which has been put forth by the Android smartphone maker lobby, is that it would lead to a growing amount of electronic waste. The second is that it would undermine Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Make-in-India’ campaign.
Nevertheless, if Apple wants to start making serious inroads, its refurbished iPhone strategy is a strong pillar. How does Cook plan on convincing Modi? What may tip the scales in that conversation will almost certainly involve Apple’s other issue with the Indian government.
There have been a number of indicators that Apple is planning on opening a manufacturing plant in Maharashtra. How much sense does a Make-in-India iPhone plant make? It’s certainly a little puzzling when one considers that the company was allowed to open its retail stores without having to adhere to the 30% sourcing norm rule – after all, if Apple is planning on making its phones in India, wouldn’t it be able to easily satisfy that rule? Especially when one considers that apart from accessories, Apple sells only four major products (iPhones, iPads, Macbooks and the Apple Watch)?
Leaving that aside for a moment, how much business sense does it make for Apple to set up an iPhone assembly plant in India? Local manufacturing set-ups help in bringing down product costs, increasing product localisation and in catering to huge demand more efficiently. While India’s import duties on electronic items are definitely high, which could be reduced by manufacturing locally, the expensiveness of an iPhone mostly stems from the company’ appetite for sky-high margins. On similar lines, product localisation isn’t how Apple operates and the demand for iPhones in India doesn’t nearly justify a plant by itself.
An export strategy is an option, and perhaps a combined manufacturing-Apple Store retail plan is what will make it work if the plant is set up in 2017.
Ambani, Mittal and Cook
There are some who doubt Cook’s visit to India is about ‘Make-in-India’, most notably the Economic Times, which ran a curiously un-bylined story titled ‘The Real Reason Why Tim Cook is Heading Here and it Has Nothing To Do with Make-In-India’.
The story primarily addresses why Cook plans on meeting India’s top telecom industrialists – Airtel’s Sunil Bharti Mittal and Reliance Jio’s Mukesh Ambani. The angle here is one that was first brought up by Cook during the company’s most recent earnings call with analysts and investors. Simply put, Cook apparently believes that the slow 2.5G and 3G networks of India don’t “unleash the power and capability of the iPhone.” With 4G-LTE mobile internet speeds being rolled out by Reliance and Airtel, Indians will realise what an iPhone can do and then presumably head to the nearest Apple Store and purchase one.
Cook’s argument has been repeated ad nauseam by a number of commentators and analysts. Unfortunately, this argument isn’t airtight: many of the more popular applications that Indian smartphone users use (Facebook/Social Networking, Uber/Ola) work just fine with lower internet speeds. But more importantly, Apple’s secret sauce rests on its impeccable hardware and the way it gels with the company’s iOS software; not the difference between a 3G and 4G connection. While 4G-LTE is a small piece of the puzzle, the price of an iPhone is by far the biggest factor affecting purchase decisions.
Development centres, start-up accelerators and more
From business strategies and wireless infrastructure, Apple has moved on to tapping India’s intellectual talent. The company plans on opening up a development centre in Hyderabad that will focus on “digital maps development”. Apple Maps, while getting better, was an unmitigated disaster when it first launched. It was part of a series of fumbles that underscored the concerns surrounding the company’s software development capabilities.
The Hyderabad development centre, however, is a curious development. Unlike other Silicon Valley companies like Google and Microsoft, Apple has largely kept its white-collar and software development workforce limited to the US (California primarily, with a few teams in Austin and Boston). Does Apple plan on hiring a new team or relocating a part of its existing Apple Maps team from the US to India? Or is it about providing space to a potential acqui-hire?
Its other plan is a little more puzzling and is very similar to its position on 4G-LTE. According to multiple reports, Apple will open a start-up accelerator which will presumably encourage developers to create India-specific apps.
In order to realise just how surprising this sounds, it’s important to understand that Apple very rarely involves itself with start-ups. It doesn’t acquire them; the company by and large does very few acquisitions when compared to Google and Microsoft. It doesn’t operate a separate venture capital arm that looks out for its parent company’s interests. It doesn’t even partner and work with other companies in the pursuit of mutual goals.
Like the 4G-LTE argument, does Apple believe that India-specific smartphone applications will boost iPhone sales? Or that the Android-first development strategy that most Indian app developers take is truly hurting its ecosystem?
Whither Apple?
It is certainly possible that each of these individual steps – the new Apple Stores, the iPhone plant, the Hyderabad development centre, the 4G-LTE rollout and the start-up accelerator – will help in moving the sales and profit needle for Apple. What also seems plausible is that Apple’s charm offensive is just that – an attempt at having the company engage more closely with the government, with India’s start-up and software development ecosystem and with the country’s consumers.
Google and Microsoft have over the last two decades done the same, helped of course by the general ubiquity of their products and software. These two companies have set up massive development centres that tap into India’s talent. They engage regularly with various state governments and Central government departments (even if it isn’t always under the best of circumstances). They, both as a corporate presence and through specific employees like Rajan Anandan, also play influential roles in India’s start-up ecosystem as venture capitalists and mentors.
While Apple may have had the most well-known human face in the form of its former CEO Steve Jobs, in India the company doesn’t register a very human presence. This isn’t to say that Apple is planning on dropping its well-documented shroud of secrecy in India. The company’s India head is unlikely to start giving media interviews or commenting on developments in India the way Microsoft’s senior management does. But engaging a little more with the Indian market is unlikely to hurt. Looked through this perspective, the meetings with Reliance/Airtel, the Hyderabad development centre and the start-up accelerator programme make more sense.
While some of the more significant parts of Apple’s strategy – the retail stores, the refurbishment strategy and the Apple plant – will position the company more aggressively in the smartphone market, Cook’s visit may ultimately be about establishing its corporate presence in India.
After largely ignoring the country for many years, why is Apple currently bullish on India? What does it have up its sleeve?
After largely ignoring the country for many years, why is Apple currently bullish on India? What does it have up its sleeve?
Apple and India have had for the longest time a singularly peculiar relationship.
The company’s founder Steve Jobs had a famous connection with the country, taking a trip to the Himalayas in search of spirituality, even though he did publicly state that after visiting India he realised that “maybe Thomas Edison did a lot more to improve the world than Karl Marx and Neem Kairolie Baba [a Hindu guru]”.
India’s consumers have historically loved Apple – perhaps not as much as the Chinese – but certainly as much as our wallets have allowed us to.
Apple the company, though, hasn’t always loved India back: Jobs shut the company’s only India office, a software development and support centre in Bangalore, in 2006, just two months after it opened with much fanfare; reports at the time suggested that the mercurial CEO found the quality of the company’s Indian operations lacking.
The iPhone-and-Macintosh-maker has also never taken the Indian market very seriously, with current CEO Tim Cook saying in 2012 that “he loves India but the multi-layer retail distribution structure present in the country” (brought on by the Indian government’s strict regulation surrounding FDI in single-brand retail) meant that in the intermediate-term there are larger opportunities outside India.
Apple <3 India
The last few months, however, have seen the pendulum swing the other way. Apple can’t get enough of India now. Last month, theEconomic Times reported that the company had filed an application with the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion to finally open its much-vaunted and inimitable range of Apple retail stores in India.
A week later, during a conference call with analysts, Cook sang paeans to the potential of the Indian market and noted that Apple had redoubled efforts to crack the Indian market. In the most recent quarter, revenue in India surged 38%, surpassing the 11% growth seen in a majority of developing markets. Forbes compared Cook’s overtures and the company’s recent advertising campaigns to that of a groom trying to woo a bashful Indian bride.
And last week, news broke that Apple had signed a number of MoUs with the Telangana government for the opening of a new Rs. 150-crore software development centre in Hyderabad; a centre that will employ over 4,500 people.
A largely hopeless cause
Apple has had good cause to ignore the Indian market for so long: the company’s method of making money runs diametrically opposite to the nature of the Indian smartphone market and the average income level of the Indian consumer.
The company’s product proposition is bafflingly simple: ‘We offer you arguably the best smartphone in the market and you will pay as much as we ask you to’. Arrogant as it may seem, this business model works.
As tech analyst Horace Dediu put it, “Apple’s lack of market monopoly coupled with a near monopoly in profits can only be explained by disproportionate value creation.” What has aided this unprecedented increase in value creation is that the prices of Apple smartphones have been historically masked in Europe and United States by carrier subsidies.
None of this works in India though. IDC figures from the end of 2015 show that while a little less than 20% of all smartphones sold in China were priced less than $100, in India close to 50% of all smartphones shipped during the same period were in the sub-$100 price segment. Indian consumers simply can’t shell out that much money and Apple’s market share in the country reflects that.
The market share of smartphone companies in 2015. Credit: IDC
The chart above shows the market share for different smartphone companies in India in 2015 and the one below for 2013.
Smartphone market share in 2013. Credit: IDC
Take a look at the pie charts above. There are a few minor shifts – the fortunes of companies such as Nokia, Sony and Karbonn have shifted in favour of Intex, Lava and Lenovo. But the broad structural characteristics of the Indian market remain the same. Samsung and Micromax remain the leaders; new competitors such as Intex, Lenovo and a host of Chinese companies fight over low margins and churn out phones that are of high-quality but come with a relatively cheap price tag.
While there are new (some would say innovative, others would say empty attempts at raising hype) forms of retail channels such as online flash sales, the crucial criterion that drives sales – price – hasn’t changed.
To its credit, Apple has managed to nearly double its market share in the country over the past two years. In the process, however, it has had to really reach into the bottom of the barrel with EMI schemes, buyback programmes and partnering with bigger retail partners. The company has slashed prices on older phones with the hope of boosting market-share. These attempts, however, have had a quick and adverse effect on its high-margins strategy.
Age-old pundit advice would demand of course that Apple produce a cheaper iPhone, one specifically meant for developing countries, but that would only drag the company down to the level of its perennially profitless Android brethren.
Apple’s next phase
What gives then? Why is Apple so bullish on India? The simplest explanation is that with China’s smartphone market slowly heading for saturation, Apple has no choice but to look at India, regardless of whether the company has a fool-proof plan to crack the market while retaining its appetite for high profits.
A more nuanced perspective is that Apple is banking on a number of factors. Whether this will amount to anything if Indian income levels don’t tick up, and they start spending more on their smartphone purchases, remains to be seen.
1) The Apple Store: The pièce de résistance of Apple’s retail strategy; a corporate retail outlet that has the highest sales per square footof any commercial real estate space. More importantly, the Apple Store is the first step in establishing Apple as a luxury brand. If you’re shelling out over Rs. 60,000 on a smartphone, you need to be able to buy into the experience; to flaunt your purchase and more importantly to do it in style.
As tech analyst Om Malik puts it, the Apple Store is “the gateway drug to the Apple experience”. India has no Apple Stores: sales are done through through a whole range of stores from the common, where iPhones are placed next to Samsung phones like a vegetable cart vendor, to Apple’s “authorised resellers” which are better but still a pale imitation of the real Apple Store.
Does Apple believe that opening Apple Stores in India, as it plans on doing, will raise sales? A few commentators and analysts believe so. If this is to be accepted, however, one has to buy into two main assumptions.
The first goes something like this: Apple isn’t considered a luxury product right now but with the Apple Store coming to India, it will be. This is a difficult premise to swallow: India’s elite flaunt their iPhones, journalists are given iPads as Diwali gifts, and India’s youth stick Apple stickers on their normal PCs. iPhones are more of a Veblen good in India than the US; Apple is the very definition of luxury in India.
The second assumption, which makes more sense, is as follows: Apple products are luxury items, but the process of purchasing an Apple productin India is anything but luxurious. Apple’s authorised resellers in India don’t do a very good job of letting consumers hold, touch and ultimately fall in love with an iPhone or iPad. If one is to accept that there is a certain magic present in the Apple Store, it’s safe to say that there’s no magic currently in the stores that sell Apple’s products in India.
While the primary premise here is still weak – that the opening of Apple Stores will result in more footfalls and sales than the current stores selling Apple products – it’s a plausible outcome.
2) The Refurbished iPhone Plan: Come September, India and other developing countries will be flooded with refurbished versions of the relatively latest iPhone. Last year, the company introduced an ‘iPhone upgrade scheme’ in the US that puts its customers on a slightly more expensive permanent rolling contract in exchange for a new phone every year. As part of this deal, consumers are required to hand in their one-year old iPhones to Apple every year.
What this means is that Apple is explicitly entering the second-hand market for iPhones: the company plans on taking these old iPhones, putting them through a strict examination of quality testing, give them a new serial and IMEI number and package it along with a one year warranty. These phones can then be sold in developing countries for anywhere between $260-$350 (the current going price in Western markets for a year-old iPhone).
As it happens, Apple has currently applied for permission from the government to import and sell these type of phones in India. In order for it to receive permission it has to prove to the environment ministry’s Technical Review Committee that it isn’t trying to move e-waste from the US to India.
If this does come through -what could happen is that when the iPhone 7 comes out later this year, a one-year old, refurbished iPhone 6S could be sold for approximately Rs. 25,000 in India. It would normally take the company three years to be able to drop prices to that extent; the iPhone 5S is currently sold online in India for Rs. 25,000. If the refurbishing plan goes through, the company could shorten this time period to one year.
The question then becomes: Will Indians be willing to buy refurbished phones? What is worse: Buying a brand-new, albeit two-year old model? Or a year-old model that has been used by another person for one year? Or will Indians simply reject both options?
How will Apple market and advertise these phones? It’s difficult to imagine how one would put a positive spin on a used iPhone, but if anyone is capable of doing it, it’s Apple.
Ultimately, both these factors that Apple may be banking on to improve its market share here in India aren’t product or technological innovations. They are clever ways of pumping up sales numbers. That doesn’t mean that Apple should rush to offer more discounts or bring out cheaper iPhones; that’s a rush to the bottom that every player should avoid.
It’s a waiting game: the Indian consumer and market isn’t a shy animal that needs to be carefully coaxed into eating food out of a person’s hands. The average Indian consumer simply needs to have more discretionary income to spend, like the average Chinese consumer, and until that happens Apple may need to look elsewhere for growth.
Featured image credit: Aasif Iqbal J/Flickr, CC BY 2.0.
Edited: This piece has been corrected for a factual inaccuracy (Telangana government and not government of Andhra Pradesh)