Chandrababu Naidu, 13 Other TDP Legislators Suspended From AP Assembly for a Day

They were suspended for staging a sit-in near the speaker’s podium.

Amaravati: Fourteen members of the main opposition Telugu Desam Party, including its leader N. Chandrababu Naidu, were suspended from the Andhra Pradesh assembly for a day for staging a sit-in near the speaker’s podium in the house on the first day of the winter session.

For the first time, even Chandrababu Naidu sat on the floor near the podium along with his party colleagues, prompting an angry reaction from chief minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, who pointed out that no leader of opposition had ever behaved like this in the house.

The TDP members were protesting against the ruling of YSR Congress for not allowing them to speak on important issues, including the relief payment to distressed farmers. Andhra farmers have suffered heavily due to floods and cyclones in recent months.

This happened during a short discussion on agriculture in the house after agriculture minister K. Kanna Babu made a statement.

TDP deputy leader Nimmala Ramanaidu was allowed to speak later but faced constant counter-attack from the treasury benches. Reacting to Ramanaidu’s criticism, the chief minister lashed out saying the TDP members were resorting to “rowdyism” in the house. He claimed the TDP legislators were speaking without any comprehension of issues.

Jagan said the government was determined to distribute input subsidy to affected farmers by the end of December.

Chandrababu Naidu sought to counter the chief minister but was denied any opportunity. The YSRC members prevented the TDP chief from talking, following which the opposition legislators protesting in front of the Speakers podium.

Speaker Tammineni Seetaram requested the opposition members to return to their seats but to no avail.

As the din continued, legislative affairs minister Buggana Rajendranath moved a motion for the suspension of the TDP MLAs from the house for a day and the motion was carried by voice vote.

Chandrababu Naidu then led his legislators on a sit-in near the assembly entrance.

Andhra Pradesh: A Year On, No Headway in High Profile Vivekananda Reddy Murder Case

The politician, who was chief minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy’s uncle, was hacked to death in his own house.

Vijayawada: It has been exactly one year since the brutal killing of Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy, Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy’s uncle, on March 15. Jagan’s mother Vijayamma and his cousin, Kadapa MP Avinash Reddy, paid tributes to Vivekananda Reddy at his Samadhi at Pulivendula on Sunday.

At 68, Vivekananda Reddy, the younger brother of former chief minister Y.S. Rajasekhar Reddy, was hacked to death by unidentified assailants inside his house in March 2019, ahead of the assembly and parliamentary elections. He had served as a former minister, two-time MLA and a two-time MP.

Initially, his family members said it was a “natural death caused by cardiac arrest”. Later, it was revealed that Reddy was found murdered with multiple gashes on his head and body, purportedly inflicted with lethal weapons. Bloodstains on the floor had been washed to erase evidence, which gave rise to the suspicion that it was a planned murder hatched by persons who knew him.

Also read: For RS Polls, Jagan Reddy Nominates Associate of His Father’s Old Enemy – Ambani

The murder created wide-spread uproar and Jagan, who was then the leader of opposition, suspected the hand of chief minister N. Chandrababu Naidu and his cabinet colleague C. Adinarayana Reddy. Jagan demanded a CBI probe, saying that he had no faith in the state police. The YSR Congress leader also accused Naidu of playing a role in the killing of his grandfather Y.S. Raja Reddy, which took place during the TDP regime in May 1998.

Naidu and Adinarayana Reddy, Jagan’s rival in Kadapa district, suspected that there was an inside angle involving the YS family in Vivekananda’s murder.

Ten months after Jagan became the CM, there appears to be no headway made in the high-profile case of his uncle’s death.

On March 11, the Andhra Pradesh high court directed the state police to hand over the case to the CBI. The order was given in a petition filed by the Vivekananda Reddy’s wife Soubhagyamma and daughter Sunitha

Earlier, Sunitha had met the chief minister, also her cousin, and expressed anguish over the lack of progress in the case even after he came to power. In the petition, she said that she feared the real culprits would go scot-free and innocent people would be made scapegoats. In the petition, she named suspects, including those from within the YS family, and asked as to why her father’s murder was fabricated as “natural death” when it was a clear case of murder.

Speaking to The Wire, Gadikota Srikanth Reddy, government whip and a senior YSR Congress leader, brushed aside the charge that YS family members may have been involved in Vivekananda Reddy’s murder. Regarding the court’s order for a CBI probe, he said, “What we have asked for at the time of the murder has become a reality now. We gave a free hand to the police and we did our best in investigating the case.”

Vivekananda’s daughter also expressed suspicions over the frequent changing of the heads of the speical investigation team (SIT) that was formed to oversee the case. The team, which was constituted by the TDP government, was initially headed by the then-Kadapa SP Rahul Dev Sharma. After the change of government, Abhishek Mohanty was asked to head the SIT. Later, Mohanty too was removed and replaced by K.K.N. Anbhurajan.

N. Chandrababu Naidu and Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy. Photos: PTI Illustration: The Wire

Attack on Jagan: No breakthrough

In October 2018, when he was waiting to catch a flight to Hyderabad, an attempt was made on Jagan Reddy’s life at the Visakhapatnam airport. YSR Congress party leaders suspected Chandrababu Naidu to be behind the “murder conspiracy”. But the TDP claimed that the entire episode was “stage-managed” for “image-building” by Jagan.

Before the SIT constituted by the Naidu government for probing the case got down to its job, the then-director general of police R.P. Thakur presented an eleven-page letter, allegedly recovered from the accused Srinivasa Rao, which said that Rao attacked Jagan to generate sympathy for his “leader”, which he thought would help him become the chief minister.

The police failed to uncover the mystery revolving around the attack, even after Jagan became the chief minister. In the two cases – the attack on him and his uncle’s murder – Jagan expressed a lack of faith in the state police under the TDP regime and demanded a probe by central agencies. Subsequently, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) was entrusted with the probe into the attack on Jagan, after he petitioned the then-Union home minister Rajnath Singh.

T. Lakshminarayana, an analyst from Kadapa district, said that it was not that the police lacked the professional competency to carry out their job, but were failing to do it in true spirit because of excessive political interference. Driving his point home, he cited the way the police had been playing into the hands of the ruling party in the current local bodies elections and had unleashed a “reign of terror” on opposition leaders under the YSR Congress rule as an example.

Also read: Industry Caught in Jagan-Naidu’s One-Upmanship in Andhra Pradesh

Cops caught in a political slugfest

The manner in which former chief minister Naidu was arrested and forcibly sent back to Hyderabad under section 151 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) after a six-hour drama at the Visakhapatnam airport on February 27 exposed how the police’s functioning has been overshadowed by the party in power. The police remained a silent spectator when Naidu was attacked with eggs, tomatoes and footwear by belligerent YSR Congress workers during his aborted Praja Chaitanya Yatra in Visakhapatnam.

The high court, responding to a petition filed by a former TDP legislator, found fault with the police detaining Naidu under the section 151 of the CRPC and directed DGP Gautam Sawang to take action against the officers responsible for the incident. Naidu, as Jagan had once alleged as an opposition leader, said that the police had been reduced to ‘stooges’ of the ruling party and had resorted to employing ‘khaki terror’ on opposition parties.

For RS Polls, Jagan Reddy Nominates Associate of His Father’s Old Enemy – Ambani

Reddy’s decision to select a candidate from the very corporate powerhouse that his father, late Y.S. Rajasekhar Reddy, waged a spirited battle against is surprising, to say the least.

Vijayawada: Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy’s gift – a Rajya Sabha membership – for Parimal Nathwani, the face of Reliance Group, springs little surprise.

It was pretty much expected when the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) chairman Mukesh Ambani personally escorted the aspirant and his friend Natwal to Jagan Reddy’s residence in Amaravati in the last week of February for a closed-door meeting.

Elections are scheduled to be held all over the country on March 26 for 57 seats in the Upper House, including four from Andhra Pradesh. Chandrababu’s Telugu Desam Party, with 21 seats in the 175-member state assembly, has fielded a Scheduled Caste candidate while Reddy with 151 seats has staked a claim for all the four seats.

It’s a sure win for Jagan’s party given his numerical strength.

Two of the four YSRCP candidates – Pilli Subhashchandra Bose and Mopidevi Venkata Ramana, ministers in his cabinet from the backward classes (BC) – are loyal to the YSR family. The two ministers lost their membership in the legislative council after the government’s decision to abolish it. Venkataramana, who was the excise minister during the previous Congress regime, was arrested by the CBI in 2012 as a co-accused along with Jagan Reddy in the disproportionate assets case.

The third candidate, Alla Ayodya Rami Reddy, is the founder of Ramky Infrastructure Limited with a presence in design-build-own-operate projects, real estate and infrastructure. Nathwani, a two-time Rajya Sabha member from Jharkhand, is aspiring to go to the Upper House for the third time from Andhra Pradesh on a YSRCP ticket.

Mukesh Ambani with Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. Photo: ANI/Twitter

YSR’s spirited battle with Ambani group

What is surprising is Reddy’s decision to select a candidate from the very corporate powerhouse that his father late Y.S. Rajasekhar Reddy had waged a spirited battle against.

At a time when his own Congress-led UPA government at the Centre and the opposition NDA maintained silence on the tussle between Mukesh Ambani’s RIL and his brother Anil’s Reliance Natural Resources Limited (RNRL) over the exploration of natural gas and oil in the KG (Krishna Godavari) basin, YSR or Rajasekhar Reddy raised his voice, defending the role of the government in settling the dispute.

Also read: Andhra Pradesh: What Explains Jagan’s Decision to Have Three Capitals

When the Ambani brothers left the dispute resolution to their mother Kokila Ben, YSR shot off a letter to the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, saying “Gas is a natural resource, a property of the nation, not of a private company.”

YSR, as the chief minister of undivided Andhra Pradesh, demanded allocation of 10% of gas explored by the Reliance group at a preferential price for his home state.

YSR’s war with the Ambani-led RIL was visibly public. The state government headed by him had even set up the Andhra Pradesh Gas Infrastructure Corporation to bid for the NELP (new exploration licensing policy) blocks in the KG basin in competition with the Reliance group. However, he could not take his anti-Reliance crusade forward due to his untimely death in a chopper crash in the Nallamala forests in 2009. Jagan Reddy’s followers subsequently vandalised Reliance showrooms, filling stations across the state, suspecting a conspiracy allegedly hatched by Mukesh Ambani in the killing of YSR.

Jagan Reddy, leading his party’s election campaign last year, promised to follow his father’s legacy as his heir apparent. But his decision favouring Reliance group’s Nathwani is not in tandem with the ideals of the late YSR, commented an analyst Ch.V.M. Krishna Rao.

Andhra Pradesh chief minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy with the YSRC Rajya Sabha candidates. Photo: YSRCParty/Twitter

Jagan’s compromise with his father’s rival?

Political expediency evidently took precedence over the legacy of Jagan’s father when it came to the selection of Nathwani for the Rajya Sabha ticket.

Soon after his candidature was announced by the YSRC spokesperson Ummareddy Venkateswarlu, Nathwani took to Twitter to express his gratitude to chief minister Jagan Reddy. Interestingly, the tweet also tagged Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, indicating the fact that he had been handpicked by Reddy for the Rajya Sabha at the behest of the top guns in the NDA.

Also read: Industry Caught in Jagan-Naidu’s One-Upmanship in Andhra Pradesh

The NDA considers Jagan to be a friend in need and his YSRC continues to aid in the passage of most key bills in the Rajya Sabha when the NDA falls short of required strength. The tag sparked a debate about which party Nathwani belonged to – YSRC or BJP. The chief minister is understood to have obliged at the request of the NDA leaders in favour of Nathwani, hoping to receive the Centre’s help in getting relief from cases with the Enforcement Directorate in which he is a prime accused.

In addition, Reddy needs cooperation from the Centre in executing his government’s agenda which includes distributive capitals, abolition of Andhra Pradesh’s legislative council and containing his arch-rival Chandrababu Naidu, analysts feel. A YSRC leader, on the condition of anonymity, told The Wire that the gesture favouring Nathwani for the Rajya Sabha ticket would surely help Jagan recast his image as a pro-industry leader after the confusion ensued about the plans by Kia Motors to move its plant away from Andhra Pradesh.

Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy and Chandrababu Naidu. Photo: PTI

For Ambani, it’s shooting two birds with one shot—sending his confidante to the Rajya Sabha and finding a friend in chief minister Jagan Reddy, who heads a state where Ambani’s Reliance group has heavy business stakes which faced uncertainty after his relations with YSR were strained. The group obviously could not work alongside the Jagan Reddy government, due to the state’s reservation policy asking private industry players to mandatorily employ 75% of the workforce from his home state.

Naidu’s game plan

Knowing, with a level of certitude, that his party could not win any of the four seats with its insufficient strength in the assembly, TDP’s Chandrababu Naidu wisely fielded a candidate that would keep his flock together. The TDP won 23 seats but at least three of its members pledged allegiance to YSRC. With its strength having plummeted to 20, the TDP is unlikely to win any seat.

Also read: Why Andhra Pradesh’s Jaganmohan Reddy Has Taken a U-Turn on NPR

Any candidate requires not less than 41 MLAs to get elected to the Rajya Sabha. The TDP aims to fix its defectors and press for their disqualification if they indulge in cross-voting in violation of the whip. But the Jagan’s party doesn’t require MLAs from the opposition camp since it can win all the four seats with its existing strength.

Andhra Pradesh: Unemployment Drives Construction Worker to Suicide

Unemployment is being attributed to the slump in the construction sector in the state following the cancellation of the free sand policy by the YSRCP government.

New Delhi: A plumber allegedly died by suicide after hanging himself at his house in the Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh after blaming his woes on the state of unemployment in the construction sector in the state.

According to a report in the Indian Express, P. Venkateswarlu shot a video on his mobile phone where he said that he had been prompted into taking the extreme step after he was unable to look after his family due to lack of work.

“For the past few months, there is no work and it is becoming difficult to sustain the family. Hence, I am ending my life,” he said in a video clip shared by Telugu Desam Party chief and former Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu.

In the video, Venkateswarlu said that he hoped that his elder brother and sister-in-law would look after his son and that he wanted his wife to re-marry and live a happy life.

Expressing anguish over Venkateswarlu’s death, Naidu said that “it is heart-wrenching to see workers commit suicide due to lack of work in the last five months and unable to see their families starve”.

The state government should wake up at least now and pay compensation to families that have lost work, the former chief minister said.

TDP MLC D.M.V. Prasad, MLA M. Giri and other leaders visited Venkateswarlu’s house at Gorantla and offered his family relief of Rs 2 lakh from the party.

Venkateswarlu’s family has also alleged that the police remained indifferent when they sought to file a complaint after his death.

Also read: Is Jaganmohan Reddy Serious About Ending Sand Mining in Andhra Pradesh?

TDP leaders have claimed that a mason too died by suicide in the Guntur district a couple of days ago due to unemployment. “Construction activity has come to a standstill due to non-availability of sand. Lakhs of workers in the construction sector are suffering due to lack of work…,” TDP leaders said.

Jana Sena president Pawan Kalyan said that suicides by construction workers had shaken his conscience and appealed to all political parties to come together to support the 3.5 million construction workers. Kalyan also sought intervention from the Centre to resolve the crisis.

Unemployment is being attributed to the slump in the construction sector in the state following the cancellation of the free sand policy by the YSRCP government.

Last month, the YSRCP government, which came to power in Andhra Pradesh in May this year, cancelled the old sand policy, after alleging the existence of a sand mafia headed by TDP members. The new policy aims at addressing the issues of indiscriminate mining of sand, black marketing, hoarding, skyrocketing sand prices, artificial supply shortage and cross-border transportation. In April this year, the NGT had also slapped an interim penalty of Rs 100 crore for the state’s ‘inaction’ in preventing mining, which was later suspended by the Supreme Court.

At least three construction workers are reported to have died by suicide in a month following the state’s new sand mining policy, according to the Indian Express report.

Last Friday, TDP workers had held a protest in front of the Krishna district collectorate, demanding compensation for construction workers who were without work for the last five months,

(With inputs from PTI)

Andra Pradesh: TDP Workers Demand Compensation for Construction Workers

The construction workers were without work for the last five months, allegedly due to the delay by the YSR Congress government in rolling out its new sand policy.

Machilipatnam: TDP workers held a protest in front of the Krishna district collectorate on Friday, demanding compensation for construction workers who were without work for the last five months, allegedly due to the delay by the YSR Congress government in rolling out its new sand policy.

Former minister Kollu Ravindra, former MP Narayana, and Krishna party chief Bachula Arjunudu and other TDP leaders also participated in it.

Ravindra and other leaders said that under the state government a tractor of sand which earlier cost Rs 2000, now costs Rs 8,000.

They said sand quarries in Andhra Pradesh have been closed for the past few months due to which construction works in the region have almost come to a standstill.

They said nearly 2.5 lakh construction workers have been left without an income for five months in the district alone. They demanded that the government help them by paying a compensation of Rs 50,000, they added.

Later, they submitted a memorandum to the district revenue officer at the collectorate here.

TDP Pulls Out of Modi Government at Centre, Naidu Says Decision on Alliance With BJP Will Come Later

The Andhra Pradesh chief minister said he tried to speak to the prime minister on the phone, but Modi “did not come on the line”.

The Andhra Pradesh chief minister said he tried to speak to the prime minister on the phone, but Modi “did not come on the line”.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI/Files

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI/Files

Amaravati/New Delhi: The Telugu Desam Party (TDP) on Wednesday night decided to pull out of the NDA government at the Centre and asked two of its ministers in the Narendra Modi government to tender their resignation today, but kept the door for ties with the BJP ajar.

The TDP took the painful decision in the interest of the state as it was left with no other option, party chief and Andhra Pradesh chief minister N. Chandrababu Naidu said at an emergency press briefing.

The two ministers in the Modi government are civil aviation minister Ashok Gajapathi Raju and minister of state for science and technology Y.S. Chowdary.

In a tit-for-tat action, the two BJP ministers in the Naidu government – K. Srinivasa Rao and T. Manikyala Rao – too announced their decision to quit.

“When the intended purpose (of joining the Union cabinet) has not been served, there is no point in continuing. For me the sole agenda is to safeguard the interests of the state,” he said.

The TDP has 16 MPs in the Lok Sabha.

Naidu’s announcement came barely hours after Union finance minister Arun Jaitley told a press conference in New Delhi this evening that funds equivalent to what a special category state receives would be extended to Andhra Pradesh, but drew a line saying politics cannot increase the quantum of money.

“We have now come out of the NDA. Party-to-party (TDP-BJP ties) issue will be decided later,” he added, hinting that their alliance may continue in the future.

Jaitley said giving special category status, as demanded by Naidu, to any state apart from those in the northeast and three hill provinces was not constitutionally possible after the implementation of the 14th Finance Commission recommendations.

For special category status states, the Centre meets 90% of the funds required in a centrally-sponsored scheme as against 60% in case of normal category states. The remaining funds are provided by the state governments.

Naidu said Jaitley’s announcement was the “last straw” for the TDP. Naidu had repeatedly insisted on special category state status for Andhra Pradesh following mounting pressure from the opposition.

Jaitley’s statement was nothing but insulting us, he maintained.

“I made every effort to get our issues resolved by the Centre in the last four years. I told them about the people’s sentiment and tried to convince them in every manner but to no avail,” he said.

“They (Centre) are with a predetermination there appears to be no way they will help us. Under such inevitable circumstances, we have decided to come out of the NDA,” Naidu said, after a three-hour teleconference with party MPs and state ministers following Jaitley’s assertions.

He said the TDP joined the NDA government only to protect the state’s interests following its bifurcation but claimed the Centre was taking unilateral decisions without thinking about the solutions to the state’s problems.

The chief minister said he tried to speak to Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the phone as a courtesy to inform him about the decision to pull out of the NDA government. “It is my responsibility as a coalition partner to inform the prime minister about our party decision. My OSD spoke to his OSD but the prime minister did not come on line,” he said.

Naidu hoped the Centre would at least now respect the sentiments of people of Andhra Pradesh.

Decision on Whether to Break Alliance With BJP Will Be Taken Soon: TDP MP

“The issue between both the parties has come to a climax as they have expressed what they can do and we have expressed what we want.”

“The issue between both the parties has come to a climax as they have expressed what they can do and we have expressed what we want.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI/Files

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and TDP chief Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI/Files

New Delhi: Telugu Desam Party MP Naramalli Sivaprasad, who has been protesting inside the parliament demanding special-category status for Andhra Pradesh, today said the issue between the BJP and his party has come to a “climax” and chief minister Chandrababu Naidu would soon take a call on the alliance.

“Most probably, there will be a conference with our leader (Naidu) today or tomorrow and a decision will be taken. The issue between both the parties has come to a climax as they have expressed what they can do and we have expressed what we want,” Sivaprasad told PTI.

Another TDP leader, Rajya Sabha MP C.M. Ramesh, hit out at the BJP for not fulfilling provisions mentioned in Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, asking if his party was demanding anything else other than those mentioned in the act.

“Till now, nothing pertaining to special status has been done by the NDA government. We do not have any other option than disrupting the Parliament sessions,” Ramesh told PTI.

Ramesh, however, refused to answer a query on the status of alliance between the parties.

Osmania University Centenary Celebrations Worsen Feud Between Students and KCR

KCR appears to have reneged on key promises made to Osmania students, who played a key role in the Telangana movement.

KCR appears to have reneged on key promises made to Osmania students, who played a key role in the Telangana movement.

On April 26, Osmania University celebrated its centenary. Credit: Twitter

Hyderabad: The much awaited and publicised centenary celebrations of Osmania University ended in controversy on Wednesday, April 26, without the customary speeches by the hosts, chancellor and governor E.S.L. Narasimhan and Telangana chief minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR).

The chief guest, President Pranab Mukherjee, finished his speech hurriedly. The entire occasion was tense and lacked the usual revelry. The event wrapped up in a matter of 40 minutes. The vice chancellor welcomed the gathering. The president delivered his speech. The registrar proposed a vote of thanks. And that was that. Instead of being a grand affair, the function ended as a damp squib.

The reason for KCR’s silence at the event is said to be reports that suggested the Osmania student community would raise slogans and disturb his speech at the event, unhappy with his government’s education and employment policy.

When asked about KCR and Narasimhan’s silence, Osmania vice chancellor S. Ramachandram said, “There is absolutely no politics. The celebrations have been a grand success and students have also cooperated fully. I don’t know why they did not speak. We rescheduled the program on instructions from state government and also the Rashtrapati Bhavan.”

Tight security to prevent dissent

In perhaps a first at any educational institution across the country, fingerprint scanning linked with Aadhaar data was used as an entry mechanism for the inauguration of the centenary celebrations of the university.

The varsity, expecting close to 20,000 participants, including alumni, had made online registration mandatory and Aadhaar number was needed for this. The move, whetted by the state intelligence, was aimed at keeping known activists from the BJP, Left parties and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) away. The move was to prevent protests and sloganeering against KCR. City police also said they had rounded up over 100 student activists and had restrained them in their hostel rooms until the VVIPs left campus. Of the 20,000 invitees, only about 4,000 turned up as the entire campus was blocked by the police with barricades everywhere.

A majority of the students were confined to their hostel rooms and a two-tier security cordon was mounted with a deployment of 3,500 police personnel, 150 CCTV cameras and around 500 policemen in mufti in anticipation of top CPI (Maoists) activists, who are also alumni, arriving for the event.

Helmets, mobile phones, bags, bottles, black flags, umbrellas, lighters, matchboxes, weapons and hazardous materials were banned at the venue. Invitees were required to carry their invitation card and a valid ID proof. “It appeared as if I was entering parliament or the CM’s residence and not a university,” said Bharat Kumar, a senior advocate and alumni of the university.

The electronic media was not allowed inside and the news feed of the inaugural event was supplied to channels by the state government’s information and public relations department. Only the print media was allowed inside the venue, but was kept at a distance from the dais so that they could not record any protests. “We were instructed not to bring any video journalists and also avoid photographers,” confirmed an official of the Telangana publicity cell.

“It was unprecedented security, unlike during the Telangana movement or even the visit of the American president in 2005,” said student leader K. Prabhakar Reddy of the ABVP. Not only students, but politicians and locals were aghast at the happenings around Osmania University campus. “What a shame, there is no portrait of the benefactor of Osmania – Nizam VII, Osman Ali Pasha or any Urdu banners at the university event,” said the leader of opposition in the Telangana legislative council, Mohammed Ali Shabbir. The Muslim community was also sore that the university and the Telegu Rashtra Samiti (TRS) government had neglected to invite a member of the royal family, though many were available, with Prince Mukkaram Jah even arriving in Hyderabad hoping to make an appearance.

Osmania University, India’s seventh oldest educational institution, was named after its founder, Nawab Osman Ali Khan, the seventh Nizam of Hyderabad, and established in 1918. Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore had thought the university was a patriotic symbol against the supremacy of a foreign language, since the medium of instruction was Urdu. “What a tragedy that Urdu was forgotten at the inaugural event itself,” said a senior Urdu journalist.

President Pranab Mukherjee and Telangana Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao at the centenary celebrations. Credit: Twitter

Why is KCR miffed with Osmania students?

As an alumnus of the university, KCR had supported the student campaign against Congress leaders and landlords of Medak and Rangareddy districts when he was in the Youth Congress in the 1970s and 1980s. However, KCR has been upset with Osmania University ever since students protested against him and burnt his effigy for withdrawing from his fast in November 2009. He was forced to continue his fast in the hospital. Following this, was his battle with the Telangana Joint Action Committee leader and his mentor Kodandaram.

After Telangana was created, KCR and Kodandaram parted ways. KCR had even refused to give him an appointment when the latter wanted to discuss university and employment policy. In early February this year, when Kodandaram wanted to lead a rally for unemployed youth, the government refused him permission. The inaugural of the centenary celebrations was KCR’s first visit to the campus since 2014.

Students of Osmania were the bulwark of the Telangana movement and for months between 2011 to 2013, they kept the police on edge with their protests. The police, under Congress chief minister Kiran Kumar Reddy of the united Andhra Pradesh, had refused to allow the students to come out of the campus and foiled their designs to gherao the assembly, the chief minister’s home and the secretariat. KCR had then spoken against the police and the Congress for curtailing the freedom of students.

“After bifurcation of the state, KCR and even TRS leaders had kept away from the university and not invited them to share power. They only used us to hit at Congress and other political players,” said Ramesh Reddy, another student leader of Osmania who was among those detained at their hostel rooms during the inaugural event.

Sources in Raj Bhavan say that KCR also influenced governor Narasimhan to not address the historic session. Narasimhan reportedly struck down the proposal of university authorities not just once, but twice citing ‘protocol’. “What protocol compelled Narasimhan to address the students? Probably Narasimhan wanted another smooth term in Raj Bhavan and therefore wanted to please KCR,” charged TDP leader A. Revanth Reddy.

Why Osmania students are angry

Since the formation of Telangana, students had expected a lot from the TRS and KCR. TRS leaders had assured the students at least five assembly seats and up to three MP tickets in recognition of their contribution to the Telangana movement. But KCR reneged on this promise. He gave the chairmanship of the Telangana State Public Service Commission to Ganta Chakrapani and one parliament seat to Balka Suman, a student leader. But he ignored other university leaders, including Kodandaram.

The student community also wants the TRS government to fulfill its poll promises of creating one lakh jobs. In addition, the government was asked to allocate Rs 1,000 crores to the university for the centenary, but it received only Rs 50 crores after a sanction of Rs 200 crores.

Student leaders say that the government has ditched the Osmania students after the goal of a separate Telangana was achieved. “KCR now wants students to not enter politics but to focus on studies. What a turncoat,” said S.K. Moorthi, an SFI leader.

Given KCR’s indifference, the Osmania student community has turned increasingly hostile towards him. Instead of wooing the students, the government used police force on them. Raids were conducted on hostels to flush out ‘extremists’.

KCR has made no efforts to build bridges with the Osmania students community. His education minister, Kadiam Srihari, a former TDP man, was not accepted by the student body, who refused to sit at a negotiating table with him. The students term the principal secretary of education Ranjiva Acharya as ‘arrogant’ and ‘non-student friendly’ with a ‘closed mindset’. Younger ministers like Harish Rao and K.T. Rama Rao have distanced themselves from student affairs and TRS general secretary K. Kesava Rao also failed to convince the students and abruptly withdrew from student engagement.

“The fact is that the student community of Osmania is angry with KCR as he had promised to make a Dalit as chief minister and later changed his mind. A Dalit from TDP is made only a deputy chief minister. But it appears that KCR had promised them (students) a share in power on the lines of Assam and it did not materalise in view of soured relations with Professor Kodandaram,” said B. Ramdass, a senior journalist.

Jeevan Reddy, Congress MLA and deputy leader in the Telangana assembly, said it was unbecoming of a chief minister to hide from dissent by using police force in an educational institution. “Is KCR ashamed to recognise the contribution and sacrifice of students,” he asked, while also wanting to know why a contingent of policemen as large as 5,000 were deployed for a historic event at an educational institution where students from over 15 countries were studying.

G.S. Radhakrishna is a senior journalist who has worked in Hyderabad for over two decades. He is an independent journalist with The Lede.

After Initial Support, Chandrababu Naidu Now Sees Problems with Demonetisation

“I am spending two hours daily to ease the problems caused by demonetisation. I am breaking my head daily but we are unable to find a solution to this problem,” the chief minister said.

Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI

Chandrababu Naidu. Credit: PTI

Vijayawada: BJP ally and Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu, who had initially supported demonetisation, made a U-turn on Tuesday, saying the decision was not as per “our wish” and that a “lot of problems” still remain without any solution in sight.

Naidu, who heads a 13-member committee appointed by the central government to look into demonetisation issues, warned that unless remedial measures are taken, people’s woes would continue in the long term. The panel he heads recently recommended that the RBI slash charges on card usage.

“Demonetisation was not our wish but it happened. More than 40 days after demonetisation, there are still a lot of problems but yet there appears to be no solution,” he said, addressing a workshop of MPs, MLCs, MLAs and other leaders of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP).

“It still remains a sensitive and complicated problem,” said Naidu.

“I am spending two hours daily to ease the problems caused by demonetisation. I am breaking my head daily but we are unable to find a solution to this problem,” the chief minister said.

“We could resolve the ‘August crisis’ (an internal party coup dating back to 1984) in 30 days but this (demonetisation) still persists,” he said.

He said banks were “not prepared” for a transition to digital economy. “They are unable to even register banking correspondents,” he added..

Naidu had initially been a strong proponent of the ban on high-denomination currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000. In fact, he had written a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on October 12 reiterating his support.

On November 9, a day after the prime minister came out with the demonetisation announcement, the TDP had even claimed credit saying it was a “victory for Chandrababu” over his fight on corruption. “This is a moral victory for the TDP,” the party had said in posts on Facebook and Twitter.

“Prime Minister Modi may have taken the decision now but Chandrababu had these thoughts even when he was in the opposition (2004-14). He had been fighting for scrapping of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes since then,” the TDP said in a Facebook post.

According to the party, Naidu had first raised the demand in 2013.

But as peoples trouble in exchanging the scrapped notes as well as in withdrawing cash from their savings accounts did not seem to be ending, Naidu changed his tone and started making critical remarks about the Centre’s move, particularly the introduction of Rs 2,000 notes.