Ahead of State Visit, Modi Says Criticism of India’s Stance on Russia ‘Not Widespread’ in US

“I don’t think this type of perception is widespread in the US … I think India’s position is well known and well understood in the entire world,” Modi told the Wall Street Journal ahead of his first state visit to the US.

New Delhi: As Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for his first state visit to the US, the Wall Street Journal has reported his belief that criticisms of India’s soft stance on Russia aren’t “widespread” in his host country.

“I don’t think this type of perception is widespread in the US … I think India’s position is well known and well understood in the entire world,” Modi told WSJ during a June 20 interview that addressed topics such as Indo-US defence cooperation and India’s place in the global world order.

“The world has full confidence that India’s topmost priority is peace,” Modi added.

India has abstained from voting in the UN Human Rights Council on matters relating to Ukraine and purchased record levels of oil from Russia even as its invasion of Ukraine continues.

Some people in the US have criticised India’s stance, including former deputy national security advisor for international economics Daleep Singh who said in 2022 that there would be “consequences” for countries that attempted to circumvent sanctions against Russia.

But despite these disagreements, India and the US are set to enter into important defence partnerships which are expected to be finalised during Modi’s state visit beginning on Tuesday, June 20 (Wednesday, June 21 in Indian Standard Time).

These partnerships include approving the joint manufacture in India of engines for the Tejas set of aircraft and purchasing 31 armed drones from the US that the Indian defence ministry has delayed for two years.

A Tejas aircraft. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Venkat Mangudi. CC BY-SA 2.0

The Wire has reported that defence cooperation between the two countries is in part an effort by the US to presumably wean India from its dependence on Russian defence equipment, especially against the backdrop of the Ukraine war.

Modi’s interview with WSJ also addressed India’s place in a multipolar world. The prime minister told the newspaper that “India deserves a much higher, deeper and wider profile and a role,” seeking to portray India as the “natural leader of the global south”.

He also discussed India’s desire to have a greater say in the UN Security Council.

“Look at the membership of key institutions—does it truly represent the voice of democratic values? … India has such a huge population and is a bright spot in the global economy, but is it present?” he asked.

Parliamentary Panel Says Procurement of Fighter Jets Should Not Be Delayed

The panel also noted that the Navy’s request to manufacture a third aircraft carrier have been brought up several times.

New Delhi: The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence has said that the Union government should not delay the procurement of additional fighter jets.

It noted that the Navy’s request to manufacture a third aircraft carrier have been brought up several times.

“In no uncertain words, (we) recommend that Ministry of Defence may take a final decision, chalk out a trajectory and start the planning process for the third aircraft carrier which would eventually enhance India’s maritime capabilities,”the parliamentary panel said in its report on March 21.

The Tribune reported that two aircraft carriers are consistently required for meeting threat perceptions and for preparedness and striking capabilities during war. A third carrier is needed as carriers have long maintenance schedules.

However, The Wire had in December 2020 reported that the possibility of materialising the purchase of a third carrier appears nebulous due to financial and operational reasons.

Also read: Why India Needs a Large Aircraft Carrier: An Ex-submariner Makes the Case

The committee also said it found “considerable delay” in the supply of 40 LCA Tejas jets from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, the newspaper reported.

“The government should consider buying state-of-the-art fifth generation fighter aircraft over the counter without losing time to keep the force in a comfortable position,” the committee said.

Previously, the panel had expressed concern over the delay in creation of the LCA Tejas jets, which it believed was one of the main causes of the Air Force’s depleting fighter jet strength.

According to the Indian Express, it had said, citing representatives of the Air Force, that “the total technical life of most of the existing squadron is expiring and consequently the squadron strength is progressively depleting.”

The current strength of around 30 squadrons, as per the committee, will deplete further as older fighter jets are phased out.

India Bids to Sell Fighter Jets to Malaysia, Says Six Other Countries Interested

“Other countries which have evinced interest in the light-combat aircraft are: Argentina, Australia, Egypt, USA, Indonesia, and Philippines,” junior defence minister, Ajay Bhatt, said.

India has offered to sell 18 light-combat aircraft (LCA) “Tejas” to Malaysia, the defence ministry said on Friday, August 5, adding that Argentina, Australia, Egypt, the United States, Indonesia, and the Philippines were also interested in the single-engine jet.

The Union government last year gave a $6 billion contract to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd for 83 of the locally produced Tejas jets for delivery starting around 2023 – four decades after it was first approved in 1983.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, keen to reduce India‘s reliance on foreign defence equipment, has also been making diplomatic efforts to export the jets. The Tejas has been beset by design and other challenges, and was once rejected by the Indian Navy as too heavy.

Also read: IAF’s Claim About Indigenisation Raises More Questions Than Give Answers

The defence ministry told parliament that Hindustan Aeronautics in October last year responded to a request for a proposal from the Royal Malaysian Air Force for 18 jets, offering to sell the two-seater variant of Tejas.

“Other countries which have evinced interest in the LCA aircraft are: Argentina, Australia, Egypt, USA, Indonesia, and Philippines,” India‘s junior defence minister, Ajay Bhatt, told members of parliament in a written reply.

He said the country was also working on manufacturing a stealth fighter jet, but declined to given a timeline citing national security concerns.

Britain said in April it would support India’s goal of building its own fighter jets. India currently has a mix of Russian, British and French fighter jets.

India is looking to ground all its Soviet-era Russian fighter jets, the MiG-21, by 2025, following a number of fatal crashes, the Times of India daily reported last month.

(Reuters)

Parliamentary Panel Criticises Delay of Tejas Aircraft Programme

Lack of coordination and a “casual approach” in enforcing timelines delayed the fighter aircraft for more than 30 years, the Public Accounts Committee said.

New Delhi: Lack of coordination among stakeholders and the “casual approach” of the monitoring agencies in enforcing timelines led to delays of more than 30 years in implementation of the Tejas aircraft programme, a parliamentary committee said on Tuesday.

In its report, the Public Accounts Committee of Lok Sabha said the project sanctioned in 1983 was delayed due to a range of reasons including issues relating to the jet’s engine, weapons package and time taken to roll out the prototypes.

The report mentioned the “casual approach” of the monitoring agencies in enforcing timelines and said it led to “inexplicable delays” of more than 30 years on the ambitious defence project.

The report of the committee, headed by Congress MP Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, was tabled in Lok Sabha on Tuesday.

The committee expressed the view that monitoring bodies with participation from the highest levels in the ministries of defence and finance could not succeed in ensuring proper coordination from the various work centres, resulting in the delay.

Also read: Centre Approves Rs 48,000-Crore Deal for 83 Indigenous Tejas Aircraft for Air Force

The report referred to the submission by the Indian Air Force (IAF) that inclusion of newer weapons was necessitated due to systems and weapons becoming “irrelevant” in the backdrop of the extended schedule of the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) programme. It noted that the addition of new weapons by the air headquarters for giving an operational edge to the LCA necessitated design changes on the aircraft.

The panel also said that formation of a liaison group right from the early stages of the LCA programme would have ensured close interaction between the design team and the user for better appreciation of mutual perception. “This would have resolved many issues related to LCA Mk-l’s shortfalls,” it said.

The report also mentioned the defence ministry’s reply stated that formation of the standing liaison group before 2007 would not have yielded fruitful results since expertise of the IAF personnel was not in the area of design of the aircraft.

At the same time, the committee said it was amazed to note that the ministry, in its action taken replies, submitted that participation of IAF has been ensured in all major reviews of the LCA programme.

Also read: IAF’s Fanciful Ambitions Now Risk Exceeding India’s Declining Defence Budget

It said the LCA Mark II in its latest configuration evolved into an altogether new military fighter in the medium weight category. It said lessons learnt from LCA Mark I programme should be kept in mind during the execution of LCA Mark-II programme to contain delays.

Tejas, manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), is a single engine and highly agile multi-role supersonic fighter aircraft capable of operating in high-threat air environments.

The Cabinet Committee on Security chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi last month approved the deal for procurement of the 73 Tejas Mk-IA variant and ten LCA Tejas Mk-I trainer aircraft from HAL to boost IAF’s combat prowess.

The Tejas Mk-IA will be equipped with an active electronically scanned array radar, beyond visual range missile, electronic warfare suite and air-to-air refuelling system.

Centre Approves Rs 48,000-Crore Deal for 83 Indigenous Tejas Aircraft for Air Force

The Tejas Mk-1A will be equipped with active electronically scanned array radar, beyond visual range missile, electronic warfare suite and air-to-air refuelling.

New Delhi: In a decision aimed at boosting the domestic aerospace industry, India on Wednesday approved a deal worth Rs 48,000 crore to procure 83 indigenously-developed Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas for the Indian Air Force.

This is the largest indigenous defence procurement, Indian Express has reported.

The decision to procure the fleet was taken at a meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said.

Calling the approval to the proposal by the CCS as a historic decision, the defence minister said Tejas jets are going to be the backbone of the fighter fleet of the Indian Air Force (IAF) in years to come.

Around three years ago, the Indian Air Force had issued an initial tender for procurement of 83 Tejas aircraft, a four-and-half generation combat jet which is manufactured by the state-run aerospace behemoth Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

The IAF has already inducted a batch of Tejas aircraft as part of its initial order of 40 jets.

In a statement, the defence ministry said the government approved procurement of 73 LCA Tejas of Mk-1A variant and 10 LCA Tejas Mk-1 trainer aircraft at the cost of Rs 45,696 crore along with design and development of infrastructure worth Rs 1,202 crore.

The Tejas Mk-1A will be equipped with active electronically scanned array radar, beyond visual range missile, electronic warfare suite and air-to-air refuelling and would be a potent platform to meet the operational requirements of the IAF, officials said.

The ministry said the government has also approved infrastructure development by IAF under the project to enable it to handle repairs and servicing at its base depots so that the turnaround time of the aircraft could be reduced and their availability can be increased for “operational exploitation”.

Also read: IAF’s Fanciful Ambitions Now Risk Exceeding India’s Declining Defence Budget

“LCA-Tejas incorporates a large number of new technologies many of which were never attempted in India. The indigenous content of LCA-Tejas is 50% in Mk1A variant which will be enhanced to 60%,” Singh said.

The defence minister said that aircraft maker HAL has already set up second-line manufacturing facilities at its Nasik and Bengaluru divisions, adding it will ensure timely deliveries of the jets to the IAF.

HAL has already doubled production capacity of Tejas from eight aircraft per year to 16.

Officials said a contract between the IAF and HAL is likely to be signed by March on the mega deal and actual delivery of the aircraft are expected from 2024.

Singh said the Tejas programme would act as a catalyst for transforming the Indian aerospace manufacturing ecosystem into a vibrant, self-sustaining one.

The defence ministry said combat aircraft has an indigenous content of 50% which will progressively reach 60% by the end of the programme.

It said the manufacturing of Tejas by HAL will give a further push to the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ (self-reliant India) initiative and boost indigenisation of defence production and the defence industry in the country.

“About 500 Indian companies including MSMEs in the design and manufacturing sectors will be working with HAL in this procurement. The programme would act as a catalyst for transforming the Indian aerospace manufacturing ecosystem into a vibrant Atmanirbhar-self-sustaining ecosystem,” it said.

The government has set a target of Rs 1.75 lakh crore (US $ 25 billion) turnover in defence manufacturing by 2025.

According to estimates, the Indian armed forces are projected to spend around US $ 130 billion in capital procurement in the next five years.

In May, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman rolled out a number of reform measures for the defence sector including making separate budgetary outlay to procure Indian-made military hardware, increasing FDI limit from 49% to 74% under the automatic route and generating a year-wise negative list of weapons which won’t be imported.

(With PTI inputs)

IAF’s Fanciful Ambitions Now Risk Exceeding India’s Declining Defence Budget

IAF’s buying plans reflect a disregard for fiscal reality, and in fact, effective thinking.

Chandigarh: Air Chief Marshal R.K.S. Bhadhauria’s recent declaration that the Indian Air Force (IAF) would, over the next decade, concurrently design, manufacture and licence-build over 320 aircraft of three – if not four – combat types, worth lakhs of crores, appears somewhat incredible.

At his annual press conference, three days before Air Force Day on October 8, ACM Bhadauria detailed the IAF’s plans to make good its fast depleting fighter squadrons, whose numbers had dropped to a perilous 28-29, from a sanctioned strength of 42. Over the next two to three years, these are expected to decrease even further to around 25 squadrons, as the IAF retires 4-5 squadrons of its 100-odd legacy MiG-21 ‘BIS’ ground-attack fighters, sharply reducing the force’s numerical platform superiority over Pakistan, leave alone China.

The air chief, however, conceded that the IAF would be unable meet its goal of operating 42 combat squadrons by 2030, but would manage 36-38 squadrons by then.

But he did not elaborate on how the colossal funds, technological input and industrial capability needed for these additional assets would be sourced. Bhaduria also tellingly admitted that the IAF would face budgetary constraints in ‘due course’, which under India’s enduring severe economic downturn due to the COVID-19 pandemic is, by all considerations, a gross understatement.

Air Chief Marshal Rakesh Kumar Singh Bhadauria. Photo: PTI

Besides, at a conservative estimate, the additional 320-odd fighter types that Bhadauria has planned for the IAF, would cost upwards of $ 45 billion, or around 68%, of the annual defence budget of $65.9 billion for the fiscal year 2020-21. And though, admittedly, this entire amount would not need to be discharged all at once – as it would be spread over several years – it still remains an inordinately large amount for a solitary weapon platform in a developing country’s military, especially one that badly needs a plethora of other assorted equipment.

This includes multi-role utility and attack helicopters, tanks, infantry combat vehicles, aircraft carriers, warships, submarines, minesweepers, armed and unarmed unmanned aerial vehicles and varied missiles and ammunition, amongst other critical materiel.

Also read: After Chinese Aggression, India Goes on Fast-Track Defence Equipment Import Spree

“The Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the IAF will desperately need to create additional financial, design and manufacturing capacities by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to achieve the goal of acquiring hundreds of new fighters,” said military analyst Air Marshal V.K. ‘Jimmy’ Bhatia (retired). There is no possible way this can be achieved under prevailing conditions, he added.

Other serving officers concurred, affirming that the IAF’s impecunious state militated against such ambitious future acquisition plans.

In late 2019, for instance, the IAF had sought an additional Rs 400 billion from the MoD to procure fighters and transport aircraft to upgrade its capabilities and defray payments for other previously acquired platforms. It stated that its capital allocation of Rs 393 billion in the annual budget for FY 2019-20 to acquire new platforms was ‘grossly inadequate’ to fund its long-deferred modernisation from a tactical to strategic force.

The IAF also claimed that it had a ‘committed liability’ of Rs 480 billion for FY 2019-20 for assorted equipment bought earlier, which was responsible for ‘severely depleting’ its allocation, leaving little or nothing for new programmes.

Midair refuelling of one of the five Rafale jets, which took off from France on Monday, on its way to India. The Rafale aircrafts are covering a distance of nearly 7,000 km from France to India with a single stop in UAE. Photo: PTI

It had to make advance payment for 36 Dassault Rafale fighters and five Almaz-Antei S-400 Triumf self-propelled surface-to-air missile systems, in addition to disbursing instalments for 22 Boeing AH-64(I) Apache Guardian helicopters and 15 CH-47 Chinook heavy lift rotary aircraft, acquired in 2015, along with two types of US transport aircraft procured earlier besides a host of additional kit.

In response, the MoD allocated the IAF some Rs 55 billion, or an eighth of what it had demanded. But to add to its woes a few months later in February 2020, the IAF was apportioned Rs 432.82 billion in FY 2020-21 as its capital outlay, some Rs 15.87 billion less than the Rs 448.69 it had received for the same purpose the previous year, further beggaring the force.

And though the military emergency prompted by China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) occupying Indian territory in eastern Ladakh had galvanised the IAF into conducting air domination sorties over the region, greatly boosting its media profile, its future procurements outlined by Bhadauria remain hostage to a crippled economy and a problem-ridden HAL and ADA plagued by inefficiencies. “The services, including the IAF continue to reflect a disregard for fiscal reality in planning their equipment buys,” said Amit Cowshish, former defence ministry financial advisor on acquisitions.

No country in the world can possibly afford to acquire so many fighters, even over a prolonged 10-15 year period to the exclusion of all other defence equipment, he cautioned.

Also read: Will the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020 Make India Self-Reliant in Defence Production?

In his presser, ACM Bhadauria declared that the force would operationalise the second No. 18 ‘Flying Bullets’ Tejas Mk1 light combat aircraft (LCA) squadron at Sulur in Tamil Nadu, equipped with full operational clearance (FoC) platforms by 2022.

This would supplement the earlier No. 45 ‘Flying Daggers’ squadron, established in 2016 with some 16 single-seat Tejas fighters, but only with Initial Operational Clearance (IOC) that was secured haltingly in two stages- IOC-1 in January 2011 and IOC-2 in December 2013 for an aircraft that had been under development since 1983 and remains little better than an advanced technology demonstrator. .

But these IOCs too were accorded with 53 waivers – of which 20 would be permanent even after the platform secured its FOC – with regard to the platforms drop tanks, airframe fatigue test and assorted weapon system configurations. Of the 40 MK1s, however, eight would be tandem-seat trainers that would subsequently join their two squadrons after all single-seat platforms had been delivered at the rate of around eight fighters per year. The IAF has been pressing HAL to double this output to 16 LCAs, but this remains a trying work in progress.

In the meantime, Bhadauria said the IAF would sign a deal with HAL for an additional 83 upgraded Tejas M1A fighters that remain under development and would not be ready for series production till 2022-23, as two prototypes have still to undertake some 200 test flights. The Mk1A is expected to feature several capability enhancements over the Mk1 model that include an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, modern electronic warfare systems and aerial refuelling capability.

Also read: IAF Lore: When Those Magnificent Men Took their Flying Machines to Delhi for ‘Jollies’

It would also be around 1,000-kg lighter than the Mk1, weighing 6,500 kg, and feature modified internal systems, under a ‘panel-in-panel’ arrangement, for easier maintainability. The 83 Mk1A deal- that includes 10 dual-set trainers-is costed at round Rs 390 billion, negotiated down over two years from Rs 500 billion that HAL had initially demanded for the tender.

But like the Mk1 model, the Mk1A variant too would be powered by USA’s General Electric F404-GE-IN20 engines that generate 80-85 kN (kilonewtons) thrust, which restricts the fighters angle of attack to around 21°, limits their range to 350-400km and weapons-carrying capability, to around three tonnes.

Meanwhile, to bridge the shortfall of fighters, till the indigenously Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) joins the fleet 2029 onwards, Bhadauria stated that the IAF would pursue its long awaited procurement of 114 Multi-role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA).

IAF fighter jet flies in the Ladakh region, amid the prolonged India-China face off, in Leh district, Wednesday, September 23, 2020. Photo: PTI

Under the long-pending proposal, one of seven shortlisted single or twin-engine fighters would be manufactured domestically under the Strategic Partnership (SP) model outlined in the newly released Defence Acquisition Procedure, 2020. Under the SP model, a domestic private sector company would partner an overseas original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to deliver the selected platform.

The IAFs April 2018 request for information or RFI for these fighters had elicited responses from seven OEMs: Eurofighter (Typhoon), France’s Dassault Aviation (Rafale F3R), Sweden’s Saab (Gripen-E), Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation and Sukhoi Corporation (MiG-35 and Su35) and USA’s Boeing and Lockheed Martin (F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and F-21).

The deadline for this programme, costing not less than $ 20 billion, is unspecified, as a not even a request for proposal or tender has yet been issued. This will be eventually succeeded by a technical evaluation of the responses, followed by user trials and complex price and technology transfer negotiations lasting, at a conservative estimate 3-5 years. This, in turn, would be followed by the domestic company creating manufacturing facilities and developing a product support system. Thereafter, all else being equal, the first of the 96 licence built fighters could roll out around 2029-30 at the earliest, said officials associated with the project, expressing little or optimism for the project’s future.

Also read: It Is Time to Accept That India’s Defence Planning Is Crippled by Severe Financial Woes

In tandem, the IAF also aims to begin inducting the first of seven indigenously designed and built squadrons of 125 twin-engine AMCAs 2029-30 onwards. Of these, the IAF envisages the first two squadrons would be powered by the US General Electric GE-414 engine with a 98 kN thrust, and the remaining five by a locally designed engine with enhanced 125kN thrust developed in collaboration with a foreign OEM.

If that were not enough the ADA-HAL combine plans on simultaneously developing a twin-engine LCA Mk2 variant powered by the more powerful General Electric F414 GE-INS6. Envisaged as an eventual replacement for the IAFs upgraded Mirage-2000H fighters, HAL aims on series building some 200-odd LCA Mk2’s, making it eventually a grand total of some 324 LCA variants alone for IAF induction.

The IAF is also in advanced negotiations with Russia for 21 additional second-hand MiG 29 ‘Fulcrum’ fighters and 12 Sukhoi-“Flanker’ Su-30 MKI’s multi-role combat aircraft which HAL will licence build, once it has completed the 272 it is currently constructing. The twin engine MiG-29 fighters that were lying in an ‘unassembled and mothballed’ state in Russia were being acquired for around $850 million and would supplement three squadrons of 60 similar platforms inducted into the IAF 1986 onwards.

With such an embarrassment of combat aircraft riches proposed by ACM Bhadauria at such tremendous cost, it appears as if only the IAF has a monopoly on the lion’s share of India’s declining defence budget.

Perhaps, the army and navy too have an opinion.

IRCTC to Pay Around Rs 1.62 Lakh as Compensation For Late Running of Tejas Express

The official said that the delay on October 19 had been caused by a derailment near Kanpur.

New Delhi: A delay of more than three hours in the running of Delhi-Lucknow Tejas Express on October 19 has cost IRCTC around Rs 1.62 lakh which the railway subsidiary will pay through its insurance companies as compensation to around 950 passengers, a first in the history of Indian Railways, officials said on Monday.

The train started from Lucknow at around 9.55 am instead of its scheduled departure at 6.10 am and reached New Delhi at around 3.40 pm instead of 12.25 pm. It departed from New Delhi at around 5.30 pm instead of 3.35 pm and reached Lucknow at around 11.30pm instead of scheduled 10.05pm.

While from Lucknow to Delhi there were 450 passengers who will get Rs 250 as compensation each, from Delhi to Lucknow there were around 500 passengers who will be paid Rs 100 each, the official said.

Also Read: IRCTC Readies Fare Strategy For First Train Route Under Railways ‘Privatisation’ Plan

One of the officials also said that each passenger can avail the compensation through a link of the insurer which has been provided with every ticket of the Tejas Express.

He also said that the delay on October 19 had been caused by a derailment near Kanpur.

Since it began commercial operations from October six for six days a week, the train has maintained a tight schedule. On October 20, the Lucknow-Delhi Tejas reached 24 minutes late while the Delhi-Lucknow Tejas arrived right on time.

Under IRCTC’s policy, an amount of Rs 100 will be paid in case the delay is for over an hour and Rs 250 for delay of over two hours, the IRCTC said ahead of the launch of its first train.

This travel insurance also includes a cover of Rs 1 lakh against household theft and robbery during travel period of the passengers, again a first for those travelling on board trains.

(PTI)

Unrest At Jadavpur University After Students Clash With Babul Supriyo

Supriyo was attending an event organised by the ABVP when he was shown black flags and asked to leave by agitating students. The situation escalated when the Union minister responded with threats of his own.

Kolkata: Jadavpur University (JU) in West Bengal witnessed unprecedented unrest on Thursday evening (September 19) following an incident where a section of the students allegedly “heckled” Babul Supriyo, the Union minister of state for environment, forest and climate change.

Supriyo was attending an event organised by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) – hitherto an absent student body in the history of student politics within the campus – when he was shown black flags and asked to leave by agitating students.

The situation escalated when Supriyo, refusing budge, responded to the agitation with threats of his own. A few hours after the impasse, he was rescued by West Bengal governor Jagdeep Dhankhar, who is also the chancellor of the university – but not before some associated with the ABVP and the BJP started a fire, vandalised the Arts Faculty Students’ Union, the UG Arts building and a few shops in and around Gate no. 4 of the university.

They also beat up some students who were found bleeding profusely near the site of violence.

“This started because the ABVP had called for a programme here today with Babul Supriyo, Agnimitra Paul and other BJP leaders who have been notorious for their propaganda – provoking riots and such in the last couple of years. In light of this, the JU student body does not believe that there is space for this fascist propaganda here (on the campus), and if they choose to come to this place and poison young minds, [then] as is our democratic right, we will choose to resist that on all fronts,” said Shounak Mukhopadhyay, a post-graduate student at the Film Studies department.

He further said: “Babul Supriyo and his guards have abused our students, actually hit the students and generally provoked many other responses that are being depicted in the media as mayhem being caused by the students. We will not stand for this and he must apologise for provoking the students and bringing in arms into an educational institution.”

Soon after Supriyo entered the seminar, a magazine loaded with bullets was found near the entrance – which was later claimed by his guards. Supriyo repeatedly urged the vice-chancellor Suranjan Das to call the police. He let his guards manhandle students and faculty alike and asked the media to take pictures of the students so they could be rusticated later.

Meanwhile, Das said that he will not let the police on campus. In 2014, his predecessor had faced massive student ire by letting police officials enter.

The vice-chancellor and other senior officials of the campus eventually fell sick and were admitted to a south Kolkata hospital.

Students have refuted claims that the attack on Supriyo was pre-planned and insisted on presenting a united front under the Arts Faculty Students’ Union (AFSU), Faculty of Engineering and Technology Students’ Union (FETSU) and Science Faculty Students’ Union (SFSU) – all elected student bodies having mixed representation from within the campus.

“We decry the AISA-SFI-TMCP divide that the media is trying to impose on us. We were protesting as general students who do not want token fascists walking our campus grounds. Babul Supriyo’s brand of politics includes provoking and highlighting reactions that show his opposition in poor light. He did not make faces at us or threaten us or hit us back while the cameras were rolling. He has done this before and we are calling him out for it. The BJP supporters are condemning the “attack” on him while circulating a photograph of him elbowing a female student, all in the same breath. This is shameful but nothing new coming from the representative of a government that depends more on divide rather than unity,” said another student who wished to remain anonymous.

The violence that was unleashed as an aftermath of the impasse shocked even the supporters of the right-wing organisation within the campus. While a political agitation is not a new occurrence at the university, physical violence and vandalism are.

“I am a supporter of the BJP, but that doesn’t mean I will support this kind of vandalism in my own campus…There are lots of ideological difference between us and them…but still I am a student of Jadavpur University first… I strongly stand with the university and my friends who were beaten by the goons…#Shame…In spite of being anti leftist, not a single person has made me feel uncomfortable inside the campus ever…Which might not have been possible if it is something other than JU..,” Aniket Mazumdar wrote on Facebook.

Trinamool Congress’s secretary-general and education minister Partha Chatterjee called the incident “unfortunate and shocking”. He said that the governor paid no heed to the state government’s request for additional time to control the situation despite chief minister Mamata Banerjee’s plea and that his actions reeked of  “partisan approach.”

“Nobody has come out of this [incident] untarnished. I strongly condemn the attempt of ABVP activists to storm the university grounds and go on a rampage against unarmed students. But at the same time, the way in which our students were behaving with Babul Supriya and the governor of the state is not something that does them any good. The media can see the way both parties behaved – two wrongs don’t make a right. This is not the end [of the matter] I fear,” said Samantak Das, professor of comparative literature and a member of the Jadavpur University Teacher’s Association.

Professor Das was also caught in the crossfire when he came to assess the situation on the ground.

Jitsoma Banerjee is a postgraduate student of Comparative Literature at Jadavpur University.

In a First, Defence Minister Flies in Indigenously Built Light Combat Tejas Fighter

Speaking to reporters after the sortie, Singh said, “We have reached a level where we can export fighter planes across the world.”

New Delhi: Defence minister Rajnath Singh on Thursday morning donned a light olive G-suit and climbed onto a Tejas fighter aircraft at Bangalore’s HAL airport to take a 30-minute sortie. Singh will, thus, remain in Indian flying history as the first minister of defence to take to air in an indigenously built fighter jet.

At 9 am, a seemingly excited 68-year-old Singh shared photos of himself to tweet, “All set for the day!”

An hour and a half later, he took to twitter again, calling the trip “an amazing and exhilarating experience”.

Singh was accompanied by Air Vice Marshal N. Tiwari, who also heads the National Flight Test Centre, Aeronautical Development Centre (ADA) in Bangalore. G. Satish Reddy, chief of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), told reporters that Singh “controlled the aircraft for some time”.

A video doing the rounds on social media showed the pilot and other Indian Air Force (IAF) officials briefing Singh before he took off in the twin-seater jet.

A light combat aircraft (LCA), Tejas was built by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). With an ability to carry air-to-air, air-to-surface and precision guided weaponry, this multi-role, supersonic aircraft is made with advanced materials like components to keep it light weight.

Also read: The Curious Case of India’s Fighter Jet Contests

On September 13, Tejas made a successful “arrested landing” in Goa, raising hopes that it would be able to land successfully on an aircraft carrier and could be readied for services in the Navy. The naval version is reportedly in a developmental stage.

Last year, the IAF placed an order for 83 Tejas at the HAL at a cost of Rs 50,000 crore. This was in addition to a batch of 40 ordered earlier, which have already been inducted into the fleet.

On September 12, announcing to reporters that Singh would fly in a Tejas, a defence official said, “It will boost the morale of the IAF pilots who are flying these aircraft.”

Speaking to reporters in Bangalore after the sortie, Singh said, “We have reached a level where we can export fighter planes across the world.” He said, “Countries in South East Asia have shown interest in buying Tejas aircraft.”

During his visit, Singh will also attend an exhibition of the DRDO.

Were the ‘Atoms’ of Acharya Kanad a Product of Science or Speculative Metaphysics?

Kanad’s positing the idea of the atom did not carry an explanatory burden; it was just a speculative thesis. It is outrageous to compare it with modern atomic theories.

Kanad’s positing the idea of the atom did not carry an explanatory burden; it was just a speculative thesis. It is outrageous to compare it with modern atomic theories.

A scanning tunnelling microscope's image of the individual atoms making up the surface of gold. Credit: Erwinrossen/Wikimedia Commons

A scanning tunnelling microscope’s image of the individual atoms making up the surface of gold. Credit: Erwinrossen/Wikimedia Commons

Recently, the Maharaja Sayajirao University made some claims in its official diary hailing some ancient Indian sages like Acharya Kanad, Maharshi Bhardwaj and Kapil Muni for their contributions to science by linking them with current science and technology. Somehow, Acharya Kanad’s name became associated with nuclear technology. How was this bizarre connection even made?

It could be because Kanad is the founder of the system of philosophy (Darshan) called Vaisheshik that propounds the doctrine of anu (atoms) as part of its metaphysics. The doctrine of anu is somehow considered equivalent to the modern atomic theory of science. Such an equivalence is outrageously strange and Vaisheshik Darshan does not deserve the merit of science.

It’s useful to understand the doctrine of Vaisheshik in brief in relation to the nature of atom to see if there could be any scientific aspects to it. Vaisheshik Darshan is one of the six schools of orthodox philosophy (the others being nyaya, samkhya, yoga, mimamsa and vedanta). Traditionally, scholars have studied Indian philosophy under these six schools, considered to be six ‘systems’ of philosophy by Max Müller and others.

Such a study in philosophy generally falls under the sub-discipline of metaphysics. In fact, any standard textbook in Indian philosophy would treat these topics of Vaisheshik under the heading of ‘metaphysics’.

The Vaisheshik metaphysics recognises seven categories, and dravya (substance itself) is one of them. Substances further come under two heads, the eternal and the non-eternal. There are nine kinds of eternal substances: prithvi (earth), jala (water), tejas (fire), vayu (air), akasha (ether), kala (time), dik (space), atma (soul) and manas (mind).

These eternal substances are not day to day concrete objects that can be encountered. Earth, water, fire and air can be considered to be principles or essences that can’t be experienced, and it is only these four eternal substances that contain atoms.

The doctrine also makes it very clear that these atoms are not perceivable but are to be inferred, although the principle of inference is not clear. As a result, it would be more appropriate to say that it’s not inference that plays any part here but some kind of speculation. For inference to be involved, there ought to be something that is empirical that it should offer an explanation for.

But if the substances are not objects of experience, then there is nothing empirical at play. The sages simply put forth the idea that the atoms of these substances are the smallest elements which are without parts (i.e. indivisible) and that are, in themselves, motionless. The movement of atoms, according to them, is caused by the unseen agency residing in individual souls. Can such a doctrine that is not connected to anything empirical be called scientific? For science (as we conduct it today) is essentially empirical.

The atomic theory in science is considered to have originated with John Dalton (1766-1844), the English physicist and chemist. Though the early Greek philosophers, like Leucippus of Miletus and Democritus of Abdera, did posit atoms in their philosophies, one never considers them to be scientific.

The starting point of Dalton’s atomic hypothesis was also substance – but the substances of Dalton are chemical kinds that are objects of experience in contrast to that of the Vaisheshik. The aim of the chemist was to discover the processes through which different kinds of substances reacted and produced other substances. Empirically, he found that they reacted in certain proportions by volume or by weight – whether as solids, liquids or gases.

The ratios of these reacting substances were always in whole numbers. A law of constant proportion was subsequently formulated. In all, this was an experimental discovery and, in this sense, an empirical discovery. Dalton’s explanation for this was that substances or matter was composed of atoms, and that during a reaction, the atoms of these substances combined to form clusters of molecules.

Of course, the atomic theory of today is substantially different from that of Dalton’s but the point is that Dalton’s was considered to be the first scientific theory of atoms. Why? Because it was attempting to rationally explain an empirical law.

The Vaisheshik doctrine has none of these features. What was Kanad’s atom, or anu, trying to explain? Which empirical finding was it trying to account for? The positing of the idea of the atom by Kanad did not carry an explanatory burden; it was just a speculative thesis. It is outrageous to compare it with modern scientific atomic theories.

One of the arguments that could be given by the advocates of the so-called ‘Kanad’s atomic theory’ is that Dalton’s theory was rejected by the evolving standards of scientific investigation. Indeed, the nature of science is to remain open to corrections, but the progress of scientific theories lies in more empirical findings made possible by advances in technology and theoretical knowledge. In its essence, science has to be empirical. Kanad’s atomic doctrine is not.

S.K. Arun Murthi teaches philosophy of science. His areas of research include epistemology and metaphysics of science, Indian philosophy and political philosophy.