Parliamentary Panel Says Procurement of Fighter Jets Should Not Be Delayed

The panel also noted that the Navy’s request to manufacture a third aircraft carrier have been brought up several times.

New Delhi: The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Defence has said that the Union government should not delay the procurement of additional fighter jets.

It noted that the Navy’s request to manufacture a third aircraft carrier have been brought up several times.

“In no uncertain words, (we) recommend that Ministry of Defence may take a final decision, chalk out a trajectory and start the planning process for the third aircraft carrier which would eventually enhance India’s maritime capabilities,”the parliamentary panel said in its report on March 21.

The Tribune reported that two aircraft carriers are consistently required for meeting threat perceptions and for preparedness and striking capabilities during war. A third carrier is needed as carriers have long maintenance schedules.

However, The Wire had in December 2020 reported that the possibility of materialising the purchase of a third carrier appears nebulous due to financial and operational reasons.

Also read: Why India Needs a Large Aircraft Carrier: An Ex-submariner Makes the Case

The committee also said it found “considerable delay” in the supply of 40 LCA Tejas jets from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, the newspaper reported.

“The government should consider buying state-of-the-art fifth generation fighter aircraft over the counter without losing time to keep the force in a comfortable position,” the committee said.

Previously, the panel had expressed concern over the delay in creation of the LCA Tejas jets, which it believed was one of the main causes of the Air Force’s depleting fighter jet strength.

According to the Indian Express, it had said, citing representatives of the Air Force, that “the total technical life of most of the existing squadron is expiring and consequently the squadron strength is progressively depleting.”

The current strength of around 30 squadrons, as per the committee, will deplete further as older fighter jets are phased out.

Two IAF Aircraft Crash During Training Exercise in Madhya Pradesh

The IAF said in a tweet that one of the pilots had “sustained fatal injuries”.

New Delhi: Two Indian Air Force fighter jets – a Sukhoi Su-30 and a Mirage 2000 – crashed in Madhya Pradesh during a training exercise at 5:30 am on Saturday (January 28).

The Su-30 had two pilots while Mirage 2000 had one pilot, NDTV reported. The IAF said in a tweet that one of the pilots had “sustained fatal injuries”.

Local police found out about the crash at around 10 am on Saturday morning, ANI reported. According to PTI, one aircraft fell in Morena in Madhya Pradesh and the other went down in the general area around Bharatpur, Rajasthan.

According to the Indian Express, initial reports suggest the crash was due to a mid-air collision, but there has been no confirmation on this yet. Defence minister Rajnath Singh was reportedly briefed on the crash by IAF chief Air Chief Marshal V.R. Chaudhari.

Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said in a tweet, “The news of the crash of Sukhoi-30 and Mirage-2000 aircraft of the Air Force near Kolaras in Morena is very sad. I have instructed the local administration to cooperate with the Air Force in quick rescue and relief work. I pray to God that the pilots of the planes are safe.”

India Bids to Sell Fighter Jets to Malaysia, Says Six Other Countries Interested

“Other countries which have evinced interest in the light-combat aircraft are: Argentina, Australia, Egypt, USA, Indonesia, and Philippines,” junior defence minister, Ajay Bhatt, said.

India has offered to sell 18 light-combat aircraft (LCA) “Tejas” to Malaysia, the defence ministry said on Friday, August 5, adding that Argentina, Australia, Egypt, the United States, Indonesia, and the Philippines were also interested in the single-engine jet.

The Union government last year gave a $6 billion contract to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd for 83 of the locally produced Tejas jets for delivery starting around 2023 – four decades after it was first approved in 1983.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government, keen to reduce India‘s reliance on foreign defence equipment, has also been making diplomatic efforts to export the jets. The Tejas has been beset by design and other challenges, and was once rejected by the Indian Navy as too heavy.

Also read: IAF’s Claim About Indigenisation Raises More Questions Than Give Answers

The defence ministry told parliament that Hindustan Aeronautics in October last year responded to a request for a proposal from the Royal Malaysian Air Force for 18 jets, offering to sell the two-seater variant of Tejas.

“Other countries which have evinced interest in the LCA aircraft are: Argentina, Australia, Egypt, USA, Indonesia, and Philippines,” India‘s junior defence minister, Ajay Bhatt, told members of parliament in a written reply.

He said the country was also working on manufacturing a stealth fighter jet, but declined to given a timeline citing national security concerns.

Britain said in April it would support India’s goal of building its own fighter jets. India currently has a mix of Russian, British and French fighter jets.

India is looking to ground all its Soviet-era Russian fighter jets, the MiG-21, by 2025, following a number of fatal crashes, the Times of India daily reported last month.

(Reuters)

Spain Joins France and Germany to Build a Next-Generation Fighter Jet

The new plane will replace the present generation of Rafale and Eurofighter jets and will ensure Europe can defend itself without depending on allies.

Germany, France and Spain signed a deal for a next-generation European fighter plane on Monday.

The framework was agreed between the defence ministers of each nation with French President Emmanuel Macron in attendance at the Paris Air Show in Le Bourget, just north of the French capital.

The arrangement will include a joint air combat system that could also control drones and satellites.

German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen said it was a “big day for the European defence union.”

The Future Combat Air System (FCAS) is expected to be operational in just over 20 years, von der Leyen confirmed: “The system will be ready by 2040, and by then we need to have found a common European solution.”

Cost factor

Von der Leyen’s French and Spanish counterparts, Florence Parly and Margarita Robles, signed the accord to develop the FCAS with a model of the delta-wing aircraft in the background.

“This project now has a resolutely European dimension: Spain has officially joined the program this morning,” Parly said.

As yet, no other European nations have come on board despite murmurings of encouragement from Macron’s office.

The French and German governments expect to invest an initial €4 billion ($4.5 billion) in the combat jet by 2025.

Germany’s opposition Left party criticised the plans. The deputy leader of the parliamentary party, Sevim Dagdelen, called it a “license to print money” for weapons manufacturers.

Reducing dependency

The fighter jet may yet include hybrid electric technologies, meaning the craft will be quieter, while also reducing its heat output, ensuring it will be more challenging to detect.

The new plane will replace the present generation of Rafale and Eurofighter jets.

The deal comes at a time of fractious military solidarity between Europe and the US. President Donald Trump rattled German officials last week with the announcement that the US will send upward of 1,000 troops to Poland. Trump said he knew where the forces would come from, namely Germany, causing a mixed reaction in Berlin.

This article was originally published on DW.

Boeing to Team up With India’s HAL and Mahindra for Fighter Jet

India last week issued a request for information for 110 combat jets for the air force, marking the first step toward a long-delayed deal that could be worth more than $15 billion.

New Delhi: Boeing will partner with India’s state-run Hindustan Aeronautics and Mahindra Defence Systems for local manufacture of its F/A-18 Super Hornet that it is offering for a large Indian fighter acquisition programme, the US company said on Thursday.

India last week issued a request for information for 110 combat jets for the air force, marking the first step toward a long-delayed deal that could be worth more than $15 billion.

The planes have to be built locally as part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make-in-India drive to build a domestic industrial base.

Boeing said it stood ready to build an aerospace manufacturing system in India along with its partners that will help India’s own aircraft manufacturing programmes.

“The Super Hornet Make in India proposal is to build an entirely new and state-of-the-art production facility that can be utilized for other programs like India’s Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program,” Boeing said in a statement during an Indian defence exhibition in Chennai.

Lockheed Martin Saab and Dassault Aviation are among the manufacturers expected to compete for the air force order, one of the world’s biggest fighter jet deals in play at the moment, industry experts say.

Lockheed, which has offered to move its F-16 production line in Fort Worth, Texas, to India, is partnering India’s Tata Advanced Systems to build the planes. Sweden’s Saab has said it will build the planes in collaboration with the Adani Group, a resources conglomerate.

The air force tender will be open for makers of both single engine and twin-engined combat jets, in a widening of the field. The Eurofighter Typhoon and Russian aircraft are also potential contenders under the new requirements.

Boeing’s Super Hornet is also competing for a separate order for 57 carrier-borne fighter jets that the navy is seeking.

Trump Administration to Call on Pentagon, Diplomats to Play Bigger Arms Sales Role

Called the “Buy American” plan, its approach is expected to ease export rules on US military exports and weigh economic benefits for American manufacturers in a decision-making process above human rights considerations.

US President Donald Trump returns to the White House from Camp David, in Washington, US, January 7, 2018. Credit: Reuters/Mary F. Calvert

US President Donald Trump returns to the White House from Camp David, in Washington, US, January 7, 2018. Credit: Reuters/Mary F. Calvert

Washington:  The Trump administration is nearing completion of a new “Buy American” plan that calls for US military attaches and diplomats to help drum up billions of dollars more in business overseas for the US weapons industry, going beyond the limited assistance they currently provide, officials said.

President Donald Trump is expected to announce a “whole of government” approach that will also ease export rules on US military exports and give greater weight to the economic benefits for American manufacturers in a decision-making process that has long focused heavily on human rights considerations, according to people familiar with the plan.

The initiative, which will encompass everything from fighter jets and drones to warships and artillery, is expected to be launched as early as February, senior officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

A key policy change would call for embassy staffers around the world to act essentially as a salesforce for defense contractors, actively advocating on their behalf. It was unclear, however, what specific guidelines would be established.

But under this more proactive approach, embassy staffers would engage more aggressively with foreign counterparts to push for US arms sales and brief visiting senior US officials so they can help advance pending deals, according to a person familiar with the matter. One senior administration official described the proposal as a “180-degree shift” in the current arms-length approach to foreign weapons sales.

Trump is seeking to fulfill a 2016 election campaign promise to create jobs in the US by selling more goods and services abroad to bring down the US trade deficit from a six-year high of $50 billion.

The administration is also under pressure from US defense contractors facing growing competition from foreign rivals such as China and Russia. But any loosening of the restrictions on weapons sales would be in defiance of human rights and arms control advocates who said there was too great a risk of fueling violence in regions such as the Middle East and South Asia or arms being diverted to be used in terrorist attacks.

Arms regulations

Besides greater use of a network of military and commercial attaches already stationed at US embassies in foreign capitals, senior officials who spoke on condition of anonymity said another thrust of the plan will be to set in motion a realignment of the International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (ITAR). It is a central policy governing arms exports since 1976 and has not been fully revamped in more than three decades.

This expanded government effort on behalf of American arms makers, together with looser restrictions on weapons exports and more favorable treatment of sales to non-NATO allies and partners, could bring additional billions of dollars in deals and more jobs, the senior US official said, without providing specifics.

The strategy of having the Pentagon and the US State Department take a more active role in securing foreign arms deals could especially benefit major defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing Co .

“We want to see those guys, the commercial and military attaches, unfettered to be salesmen for this stuff, to be promoters,” said the senior administration official, who is close to the internal deliberations and spoke on condition of anonymity.

A State Department official, asked to confirm details of the coming new policy, said the revamped approach “gives our partners a greater capacity to help share the burden of international security, benefits the defense industrial base and will provide more good jobs for American workers.”

The White House and Pentagon declined official comment.

Defense industry officials and lobbyists have privately welcomed what they expect will be a more sales-friendly approach.

Trump, a Republican, has the legal authority to direct government embassy “security assistance officers,” both military personnel and civilians, to do more to help drive arms sales.

Administration officials see this group, which until now has had more limited duties such as helping to manage US military aid overseas and providing some information to foreign governments for buying US arms, as underutilised by previous presidents.

‘Back seat’ for human rights?

One national security analyst said that easing export restrictions to allow defense contractors to reap greater profits internationally would increase the danger of top-of-the-line US weapons going to governments with poor human rights records or being used by militants.

“This administration has demonstrated from the very beginning that human rights have taken a back seat to economic concerns,” said Rachel Stohl, director of the conventional defense program at the Stimson Centre in Washington. “And the short-sightedness of a new arms export policy could have serious long-term implications.” The administration officials said human rights and regional security concerns would remain part of the formula for arms sales decisions. But they said such reviews would now afford greater weight than before to whether a deal would be good for the US economy and strengthen America’s defense industrial base, in which case red tape would be cut accordingly. Rules to make it easier to sell US-made military drones overseas and compete against fast-growing Chinese and Israeli rivals are also expected to be in the Trump plan, officials said.

Trump‘s Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, also sought to make it easier to sell to America’s most trusted allies but in a more cautious approach that his administration billed as a way to boost American business while keeping strict controls against more dangerous arms proliferation. Foreign weapons sales soared during his tenure, with the US retaining its position as the world’s top arms supplier.

Shares of the five biggest US defense contractors, including Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon Co , General Dynamics Corp and Northrop Grumman have more than tripled over the last five years and currently trade at or near all-time highs. Foreign military sales in fiscal 2017, comprising much of Trump‘s first year in office and the final months of Obama’s term, climbed to $42 billion, compared to $31 billion in the prior year, according to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency. The Trump administration has already moved forward on several controversial sales. Those include a push for $7 billion in precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia despite concerns they have contributed to civilian deaths in the Saudi campaign in Yemen’s civil war and the unblocking of $3 billion in arms to Bahrain, which was also held up by human rights concerns under Obama.

Similar concerns have been raised over the administration’s preparations to make it easier for American gun makers to sell small arms, including assault rifles and ammunition, to foreign buyers.

A draft of the overall policy recently finished by teams of State, Defense and Commerce Department officials coordinated by Trump‘s National Security Council must now be approved by a senior cabinet members before being sent to his desk, the government sources said.

Once Trump announces an extensive framework of the plan, there will be a 60-day public comment period. After that, the administration is expected to unveil further details. Some of the changes are expected to take the form of what is formally known as a presidential “National Security Decision Directive,” two of the sources said.

(Reuters)

US Warplane Downs Syrian Army Fighter Jet in Raqqa

The Syrian regime claimed that the US-led coalition was trying to undermine its efforts, while the US claimed that the jet was taken down in self-defence .

FILE PHOTO: Two US Marine Corps F-18 Super Hornets depart after receiving fuel from a 908th Expeditionary Air Refueling Squadron KC-10 Extender during a flight in support of Operation Inherent Resolve May 31, 2017. Credit: Reuters/US Air Force/Files

Amman/Washington: A US warplane shot down a Syrian army jet on Sunday in the southern Raqqa countryside, with Washington saying the jet had dropped bombs near US-backed forces and Damascus saying the plane was downed while flying a mission against ISIS militants.

A Syrian army statement released on Syrian state television said the plane crashed and the pilot was missing in the first such downing of a Syrian jet by the US since the start of the conflict in 2011.

The army statement said it took place on Sunday afternoon near a village called Rasafah.

The “flagrant attack was an attempt to undermine the efforts of the army as the only effective force capable with its allies … in fighting terrorism across its territory,” the Syrian army said.

“This comes at a time when the Syrian army and its allies were making clear advances in fighting the Daesh (ISIS) terrorist group,” it added.

The US Central Command later issued a statement saying the Syrian plane was downed “in collective self-defence of Coalition-partnered forces,” identified as fighters of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) near Tabqah.

It said that “pro-Syrian regime forces” had earlier attacked an SDF-held town south of Tabqa and wounded a number of fighters, driving them from the town.

Coalition aircraft in a show of force stopped the initial advance. When a Syrian army SU-22 jet later dropped bombs near the US-backed forces, it was immediately shot down by a US F/A-18E Super Hornet, the statement said.

Before it downed the plane, the coalition had “contacted its Russian counterparts by telephone via an established “de-confliction line” to de-escalate the situation and stop the firing.”

The coalition does “not seek to fight the Syrian regime, Russian or pro-regime forces” but would not “hesitate to defend itself or its “partnered forces from any threat,” the statement said.

The US-led coalition has in recent weeks escalated its aerial bombing campaign in northern Syria and Raqqa province. US-backed forces have encircled the city of Raqqa and captured several districts from the militants.

The Syrian army, which has been taking territory from retreating ISIS militants in the eastern Aleppo countryside, has moved into Raqqa province and seized back some oil fields and villages that had been under the militants’ control for almost three years.

An SDF official told Reuters the Syrian army had been engaged in skirmishes in recent days with US-backed forces near the town of Maskaneh close to the borders of Raqqa province, much of which is now held by US-backed groups fighting ISIS.

The Syrian army backed by Iranian-backed militias has also been in competition in southeastern Syria with US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) rebels who are also trying to recapture territory from ISIS.

On several occasions in recent weeks, warplanes of the US-led coalition have also struck pro-government forces to prevent them advancing from a US-controlled garrison in southeastern Syria at a spot where the country’s borders join with Iraq and Jordan.

Washington also described those strikes as self-defence.

(Reuters)

China Demands End to US Surveillance After Aircraft Intercept

The incident, likely to increase tension in and around the contested waterway, took place in international airspace on May 17 as the plane carried out “a routine US patrol”.

The incident, likely to increase tension in and around the contested waterway, took place in international airspace on May 17 as the plane carried out “a routine US patrol”.

A Chinese J-11 fighter jet is seen flying near a US Navy P-8 Poseidon about 215 km (135 miles) east of China's Hainan Island in this US Department of Defense handout photo taken August 19, 2014. Credit: Reuters/US Navy/Handout

A Chinese J-11 fighter jet is seen flying near a US Navy P-8 Poseidon about 215 km (135 miles) east of China’s Hainan Island in this US Department of Defense handout photo taken August 19, 2014. Credit: Reuters/US Navy/Handout

Washington/Beijing: Beijing demanded an end to US surveillance near China on May 19 after two of its fighter jets carried out what the Pentagon said was an “unsafe” intercept of a US military reconnaissance aircraft over the South China Sea.

The incident, likely to increase tension in and around the contested waterway, took place in international airspace on May 17 as the plane carried out “a routine US patrol,” a Pentagon statement said.

A US Defence official said two Chinese J-11 fighter jets flew within 50 feet (15 meters) of the US EP-3 aircraft. The official said the incident took place east of Hainan island.

“Initial reports characterised the incident as unsafe,” the Pentagon statement said.

“It must be pointed out that US military planes frequently carry out reconnaissance in Chinese coastal waters, seriously endangering Chinese maritime security,” China‘s Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei Hong told reporters.

“We demand that the US immediately cease this type of close reconnaissance activity to avoid having this sort of incident happening again,” Hong said.

Speaking at a regular press briefing, he described the Pentagon statement as “not true” and said the actions of the Chinese aircraft were “completely in keeping with safety and professional standards.”

“They maintained safe behaviour and did not engage in any dangerous action,” Hong said.

The encounter comes a week after China scrambled fighter jets as a US Navy ship sailed close to a disputed reef in the South China Sea.

Another Chinese intercept took place in 2014 when a Chinese fighter pilot flew acrobatic manoeuvres around a US spy plane. The intercept occurred days before President Barack Obama travels to parts of Asia from May 21-28, including a Group of Seven summit in Japan and his first trip to Vietnam.

China claims most of the South China Sea, through which $5 trillion in ship-borne trade passes every year. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims.

Washington has accused Beijing of militarising the South China Sea after creating artificial islands, while Beijing, in turn, has criticised increased US naval patrols and exercises in Asia. The Pentagon statement said the Department of Defence was addressing the issue through military and diplomatic channels.

China‘s Defence Ministry said in a fax that it was looking into reports on the incident.

“Dangerous intercepts”

In 2015, the US and China announced agreements on a military hotline and rules of behaviour to govern air-to-air encounters called the Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES).

“This is exactly the type of irresponsible and dangerous intercepts that the air-to-air annex to CUES is supposed to prevent,” said Greg Poling, director of the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative at Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank.

Poling said either some part of China‘s air force “hadn’t gotten the message,” or it was meant as a signal of displeasure with recent US freedom of navigation actions in the South China Sea.

“If the latter, it would be very disappointing to find China sacrificing the CUES annex for political gamesmanship.”

Zhang Baohui, a security expert at Hong Kong’s Lingnan University, said he believed the encounter highlighted the limitation of CUES, and shows that Chinese pilots would still fly close to US surveillance planes if needed.

“Frankly, we’re always going to see these kinds of incidents as China will always put the priority on national security over something like CUES whenever it feels its interests are directly threatened,” he said.

The encounter took place in international airspace about 100 nautical miles south of mainland China and about 50 nautical miles east of Hainan island, a Pentagon spokesman said in a statement issued later on May 19.

Regional military attaches and experts say the southern Chinese coast is a military area of increasing sensitivity for Beijing. Its submarine bases on Hainan are home to an expanding fleet of nuclear-armed submarines and a big target for on-going Western surveillance operations.

The Guangdong coast is also believed to be home to some of China‘s most advanced missiles, including the DF-21D anti-ship weapon.

The Pentagon last month called on China to reaffirm it has no plans to deploy military aircraft in the Spratly Islands after China used a military plane to evacuate sick workers from Fiery Cross Reef, where it has built a 9,800-foot (3,000 meter) runway.

In April 2001, an intercept of a US spy plane by a Chinese fighter jet resulted in a collision that killed the Chinese pilot and forced the American plane to make an emergency landing at a base on Hainan.

The 24 US air crew members were held for 11 days until Washington apologised for the incident. That encounter soured US-Chinese relations in the early days of President George W. Bush’s first administration.

Last month, the Pentagon said that Russia had intercepted a US Air Force aircraft over the Baltic Sea in an “unsafe and unprofessional” way.

(Reuters)