Taj Mahal Palace

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres Urges India To Show ‘Strong Commitment’ to Inclusivity

Speaking after paying floral tributes to martyrs of the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai at the Taj Mahal Palce hotel, Guterres also said that no cause can justify terrorism of any kind.

Mumbai: United Nations secretary general Antonio Guterres on Wednesday said India’s voice on the global stage can only gain in authority and credibility from a strong commitment to inclusivity and respect for human rights at home.

Addressing students of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Guterres said, “As an elected member of the Human Rights Council, India has a responsibility to shape global human rights, and to protect and promote the rights of all individuals, including members of minority communities.”

This could be done by “securing and upholding the rights and dignity of all people, especially the most vulnerable, by taking concrete action for inclusion, recognizing the enormous value and contributions of multi-cultural, multi-religious and multi-ethnic societies, and by condemning hate speech unequivocally,” he said.

Guterres also stressed the need for protecting the rights and freedoms of journalists, human rights activists, students and academics, and ensuring the continued independence of India’s judiciary.

His comments come as several international agencies monitoring human rights, press freedom and other fundamental rights have downgraded India’s ranking since the BJP under Narendra Modi came to power.

According to the news agency AFP, though Guterres praised India’s achievements in 75 years of Independence, he said “diversity is a richness… is not a guarantee”.

“It must be nurtured, strengthened and renewed every day,” he added.

Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru’s values need to be guarded by “condemning hate speech unequivocally”, he added.

‘Fighting terrorism a global priority’

Earlier, speaking after paying floral tributes to martyrs of the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai at the Taj Mahal Palace hotel, Guterres on Wednesday said fighting terrorism must be a global priority. He also said that no cause can justify terrorism of any kind.

“Fighting terrorism should be the global priority of every country,” said Guterres.

People need to recognise the diversity and richness of cultures to stay together, Guterres said.

“Terrorism is absolute evil and has no place in today’s world. No cause and no incident can justify terrorism,” Guterres said.

“One of my first acts after becoming secretary-general was to establish an office for counter-terrorism to cooperate, guide and prepare countries in the fight against terrorism,” he said.

“This office is fighting against the roots of violent extremism. Be it religion or ethnicity or beliefs, no reason can justify violent extremism,” he said.

Describing the 26/11 terror attacks as one of the most barbaric acts of terrorism in history, Guterres said the 166 victims of the attacks are “heroes of our world”.

“I want to express my deepest condolences to the family and friends and to the people of India and also those from other parts of the world who lost their lives,” he said.

Accompanied by Maharashtra chief minister Eknath Shinde and deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis, Guterres placed a floral wreath at the 26/11 attacks memorial in the hotel.

The Taj Mahal Palace hotel was one of the targets of the horrific terror attacks in 2008.

It is the UN chief’s first visit to India since his second term in office commenced in January. He had earlier visited the country in October 2018 during his first term.

Guterres landed in Mumbai on Wednesday shortly after midnight via a commercial flight. He was greeted by senior Maharashtra government officials on arrival.

Guterres delivered a public address at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mumbai on UN-India partnership, before flying to Gujarat, where he will join Prime Minister Narendra Modi at an event relating to the Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) in Gujarat’s Kevadiya on October 20.

His visit to the country comes more than a week before the UN Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee holds its two-day deliberations in India.

Other comments

Interacting with students at the IIT, he also spoke about violence against women, comparing it to a “big cancer” and called for an “emergency plan” to tackle it in every country.

He also pointed out that women activists and politicians are targeted in a big way on social media.

The UN is working to achieve gender parity within its own organisation, he said.

“I must confess that there is one problem that I did not manage to solve. Many people thought – and I fully respect that – the secretary general of the United Nations must be a woman,” he said.

Speaking on climate change, he said there was a need for a historical pact between developed and developing countries to counter it and keep the temperature under control.

G20 countries are responsible for 80% of global emissions and they must take the lead in cutting greenhouse gases, he added.

“We need a historical pact in which developed countries strongly support, with financial and technical resources, the emerging economies to allow for combined efforts of the two with extra requirements from the developed countries to allow us to defeat climate change and keep the temperature under control,” he said.

Climate crisis could be the greatest barrier to collective development aspirations, and India is no exception. It is already a grave threat to India’s economy, agriculture and food sector, and to the health, lives and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people, Guterres pointed out.

Stressing the need for renewables, he said critical renewable technologies, such as battery storage, should be treated as global public goods.

The international financial system is “morally bankrupt” as it favours the rich countries, and he expected India’s involvement in reforming it.

The developing countries received “very little from the financial instruments of recovery” as they tried to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, and some of them are facing debt distress, he observed.

(With PTI inputs)

Note: This article was originally published at 7:22 pm on October 19, 2022 and republished at 10 pm on the same day.

Total Recall: Ten Things That Went Wrong During the 26/11 Attacks

Intelligence inputs were not acted upon, terrorists’ unsuccessful attempts to enter Mumbai were not detected and there was a delay in sending in NSG commandoes.

Note: This article was originally published on November 26, 2018 and was republished on November 26, 2021.

Looking back at the 26/11 Mumbai attacks with the benefit of hindsight, the missed opportunities to both prevent the attacks and minimise their impact are clear. The Wire brings you a list of things that went wrong, or could have been done differently.

1. Slip up on intelligence inputs

In the two years preceding the attacks, American-born Pakistani terrorist David Richard Headley visited India five times to identify the targets. He had three wives, two of whom had told US authorities of his terror associations. In 2005, an American woman married to him told federal investigators in the US that she believed he was a member of the Lashkar-e-Tayyabba. Two years later, his Moroccan wife warned American authorities in Pakistan that he was plotting an attack.

The Central Intelligence Agency tipped India off about the possibility of a major terrorist attack on Mumbai. There were some 26 alerts in all. The inputs revealed that an attack may take place through the sea route, and five-star hotels in Mumbai may be targeted. The Research and Analysis Wing and Intelligence Bureau were unable to prevent the strikes.

2. Presence of mole went undetected

The Siege, a book by Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott-Clark, claims that Headley revealed that his handler, Major Iqbal of the Inter-Services Intelligence, once boasted about having a “super agent” known as ‘Honey Bee’ in New Delhi.

This mole reportedly helped the terror group identify a South Mumbai fishing colony, Badhwar Park, as a suitable landing site for the terrorists. ‘Honey Bee’ has still not been identified.

Read: What the Maharashtra Government Promised to Do Based on 26/11 Inquiry

3. Two failed attempts to enter Mumbai went undetected

While testifying before a Mumbai court over video in 2016, Headley said that there were two failed attempts to attack the city before 26/11 by the same 10 terrorists. The first attempt was made on September 8, but the boat hit rocks in the ocean and sank. The weapons and explosives were lost, but those on board survived. Another attempt was made in October, but failed.

4. Fishermen reported presence, police was slow to respond

Some fishermen and shopkeepers who were suspicious of the strangers who docked at Colaba on November 26, 2008 questioned them, but were told, “mind your own business”. They reported the presence of these men to the police, but there was no immediate action. Even earlier, a fisherman had written to the police about the possibility of terrorists bringing explosives from the sea but was ignored.

Also read: On the Anniversary of 26/11, India Needs to See Beyond the US Model of Counter-Terrorism

5. Terrorists were better equipped

While the attackers passed by a police station, they did not face any resistance as the police realised that they were outgunned. The police switched off the lights and closed the gates.

Armed with Arges hand grenades, automatic assault rifles and improvised explosive devices, the well-trained terrorists had an upper hand over the local police, who were taken by surprise.

Also read: Full Text: What the High Level Inquiry Committee on the 26/11 Attacks Had to Say

6. Delay in deeming it a terror strike

Despite a number of public places being targeted, many being killed and the media telecasting the attacks, the police agencies and administration took a long time to identify what was happening as a terror attack. Initially, they thought it to be an underworld gang war.

A review of the happenings revealed that it was past midnight – and three hours after the terror strikes began – that the then Maharashtra chief minister urged the Centre to send in the National Security Guard (NSG) team.

7. NSG, marine commandoes took very long to arrive

Though Mumbai had witnessed several terrorist acts before, there was no NSG centre close by. Commandoes had to be flown in from Manesar in Haryana. When NSG chief J.K. Dutt asked for a plane, he was told that the transport aircraft was in Chandigarh. Finally, R&AW intervened and provide an Ilyushin 76 parked at Palam airstrip to rush the commando unit to Mumbai.

However, this was a smaller aircraft and could only transport 120 troops. This meant that transporting the full team required three trips. Refuelling the aircraft and finding crew members also took away precious time, and the aircraft took off a good two hours after the request was made. The aircraft then took nearly three hours to reach Mumbai.

In order to counter the four terrorists in the Taj Mahal hotel, marine commandoes were summoned. But they too reached three hours after the attack began. As the local police was also not rushed in large numbers, they failed to contain the heavily armed attackers to a limited area.

8. Pakistani handlers benefited from media coverage

With TV news channels providing live coverage of the attacks, rescue operations were hampered. Pakistani handlers of the terrorists reportedly told them about the presence of dignitaries in the hotels as well as the impending security operations.

Also read: Photo Essay: Maximum Terror, and How a Fallible City Stood Strong

It was on November 28 that the media was directed to only show “deferred” footage. Before there, no protocol had been put in place on how the emergency situation should be covered.

9. Terrorists knew much more about the buildings under attack than the NSG

When the NSG reached Mumbai on November 27 morning, it did not have access to detailed layouts or maps of the buildings under attack. On the other hand, due to the recon done by Headley, the terrorists had this information. At the Taj, Oberoi and Nariman House, the NSG commandos fought with a major handicap.

10. NSG not given intercepted conversations

Though the Anti-Terror Squad of the Mumbai police recorded conversations between the terrorists and their handlers, these were not passed on quickly to the NSG. In addition, the terrorists’ plan to execute the hostages at Nariman House was not conveyed to the commandoes.

The Two Accused in 26/11 Mumbai Attack Who Never Were

Faheem Ansar and Sabahuddin Ahmed were arrested for allegedly providing a base for the attackers. In spite of being acquitted in 2013, both continue to languish in prison.

Mumbai: On November 26, 2008, ten members of Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, an Islamic terrorist organisation based in Pakistan, carried out a series of 12 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks that lasted for four days across Mumbai. This attack left 166 – including civilians and police officers – dead and scores severely incapacitated. But beyond these ten terrorists and their victims, there were also two young Indian Muslims who were falsely charged and thrown before the judiciary and media as the “local faces” of one of the deadliest terror attacks in the country.

Faheem Ansari, a resident of Goregaon area in the western suburbs of Mumbai, and Sabahuddin Ahmed, from Bihar, were arrested for allegedly providing a base for the 26/11 attackers, including Ajmal Kasab. But by the time they were acquitted by the Supreme Court in August 2013, Ansari’s wife Yasmin says, the worst had already hit the family.

“My normal, healthy family life was shredded into pieces overnight. My child was rendered “fatherless”. From being a regular worker at his brother’s paper workshop, Faheem was tagged along with the most dreaded terrorists of Pakistan,” Yasmin recalls.

Faheem’s nightmare actually began in February 2008, ten months before the November 26 Mumbai attack. He, along with Ahmed and six others was picked up for his alleged role in another attack on the CRPF base in Uttar Pradesh’s Rampur which left eight people dead.

Also read: Total Recall: Ten Things That Went Wrong During the 26/11 Attacks

Yasmin claims that these charges were false as well. Ansari, after his brother’s business began slowing down, had decided to start his own. “We thought he could get fabrics from UP and sell it in Mumbai. I still remember he had left for UP with some money to set up his small business here. He never returned home,” she recalls.

While the trial in the Mumbai terror attack case has been disposed and Ansari and Ahmed have already been acquitted, the Rampur case is still pending. Yasmin says that in the past 11 years, several judges have changed in the Rampur case and the trial has almost been concluded; it is awaiting judgement. “Evidence has already been recorded, but the judge was transferred last year for the fifth or the sixth time, I don’t remember. And since then, Faheem and others are waiting for a new judge to be appointed so that a verdict is passed,” she told The Wire.

Faheem was booked in the Rampur firing case in February 2008 and Yasmin says the family was informed almost a month later. “We had no idea what was happening. We haven’t had any interaction with the police or lawyers before that point. By the time the family could muster the courage and raise funds to travel to UP, it was already four months”.

Faheem Ansari being arrested by Mumbai police. Credit: PTI

Yasmin says in those eight months between February and November, she met her husband only once at the Bareilly prison and then directly when he was shown arrested in the Mumbai terror case.

According to the Mumbai police’s crime branch, which was desperate to show local links to the attack, Ansari and Ahmed had reconnoitred months in advance and had prepared maps that were handed over to each group of gunmen. These maps, according to the prosecution, had depicted the route from areas like Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus to other locations like Malabar Hill in south Mumbai, where the state chief minister’s residence is located.

This claim was, however, rubbished by the sessions judge M.L. Tahiliyani, who had presided over the trial. The court observed that there was no need for the gunmen to rely on hand-drawn maps when there was far better technology available on the internet.

“This also does not appeal to reason – particularly when better-coloured maps can be downloaded and prints can be taken out from various websites like Google Earth and Wiki Mapia…”

“On the contrary, almost all the pieces of evidence to connect the accused [Ansari] and [Ahmed] with the alleged offences are found to be doubtful and tainted…” These were some of the crucial observations made by the trial court while acquitting the duo. These observations were later upheld, both in the high court and the Supreme Court when the state appealed against the acquittal.

The acquittal, however, Yasmin says, means nothing to her family. As soon as he was given a clean chit by the Supreme Court, Ansari was moved back to UP in 2013. And since then, the couple has managed to meet only two or three times. “We have no one there [In UP]. Travelling to UP means raising funds for travel and also our stay there. It gets cumbersome”.

So now, the couple stays in touch with each other through letters. “He would write letter after letter to me describing his life inside the prison. Those letters which have messages for the family, about how he missed us and how he would feel desperate to be released from prison. Those letters would just break my heart each time”.

One of the letters written by Faheem Ansari to his wife Yasmin from Bareilly prison. Credit: Sukanya Shantha

She adds, the frequency of Ansari’s letters has slowly reduced and now he sticks to information pertaining to just his trial. “Now he only writes to me about the case and what he expects of the lawyers. Nothing more. Maybe this prolonged stay in the prison has taken a toll on him emotionally,” she wonders, sitting at her residence in Mumbra, in the suburbs of Thane district, 30 kms from Mumbai.

Yasmin says at least Faheem has his family to worry for him and provide him emotional support, but in Ahmed’s case, no one from his family came forward. “Maybe they were too scared. We have not heard [from] of any of his family members or relatives in the past 11 years. We first got to know that someone called Sabahuddin from Bihar was also arrested along with Faheem in the Mumbai and Rampur cases. We know nothing more about him”.

Hemant Karkare had given Faheem a ‘clean chit’

Like in the Mumbai case, she claims, in the Rampur case too, her husband would have received a clean-chit if the then ATS chief Hemant Karkare was alive. Soon after the arrest, Karkare had asked his officers to look into Ansari’s criminal antecedents in the state. He had concluded Ansari had no role in any criminal activities in the state and had indicated that his UP arrest could be baseless too.

“But before we could find a way to take Kakare sahab’s help, he got killed in the Mumbai terror attack,” Yasmin claims. Karkare was the chief of Mumbai’s Anti-Terrorist Squad and was killed in action during the 2008 Mumbai attacks. He was handling some high-profile cases like the Malegaon blasts of 2006 and 2008 at the time of his death. Karkare’s presence, she says, would have also ensured that Faheem and Sabahuddin would not have had to endure false charges in the Mumbai terror attack.

Also read: 26/11 and the Media: Where Were the Protocols?

The arrest changed it all

Ansari’s family, which had once lived in Mumbai’s suburbs, had to move into a smaller house in a Muslim locality in Mumbra post his arrest. “Faheem’s arrest had a direct impact on the family business. He was handling their paper bag-making business. Once he got arrested, and I and his brothers began chasing lawyers and shuttling between UP and Mumbai, the business took a beating. It was eventually shut down”.

Faheem Ansari after his acquittal. Credit: PTI

In Faheem’s absence, Yasmin, who had studied until Class 10, took up tailoring. “I, along with my sister-in-law have been carrying out the tailoring work. It is enough to take care of me and my daughter,” she says.

Their daughter Iqra was only five at the time of the first arrest. Yasmin says Iqra has no happy memory of her childhood. “She only remembers seeing her father in jail on one or two occasions. I wish we would soon start afresh and Iqra has better memories to hold on to,” says Yasmin.

Iqra is now in Class 11 and is studying in a college in Mumbai. The mother-daughter duo shifted to Mumbai – closer to her college – a few months ago. “I wanted to ensure my daughter feels safe and has a conducive environment to study. I could not provide her anything else. I wanted to ensure at least her education isn’t compromised”.