Stockpiling Leads India’s Coal Import to Drop 43.2% In July

The coal import fell to 11.13 million tonnes. The country had imported 19.61 MT of coal in July 2019.

New Delhi: India’s coal import fell 43.2% to 11.13 million tonnes (MT) in July this year on account of high stockpile of the dry fuel at pitheads, plants and ports.

The country had imported 19.61 MT of coal in July 2019, according to a provisional compilation, by mjunction services limited, based on the monitoring of vessels’ positions and data received from shipping companies.

Mjunction – a joint venture between Tata Steel and the Steel Authority of India – is a B2B e-commerce company that also publishes research reports on coal and steel verticals.

“Imports in July 2020 stood at 11.13 million tonnes (provisional) … Earlier, coal and coke imports in July 2019 stood at 19.61 MT,” it said.

During April-July 2020, total coal imports were recorded at 57.27 MT, which is 35.76% lower than 89.15 MT imported during April-July 2019, it said.

Commenting on the current trend in coal imports, mjunction managing director and chief executive Vinaya Varma said, “Import demand continued to be weak amidst high stockpile of coal at pitheads, plants and ports. The market participants seem to have adopted a wait and watch approach and are currently looking for a direction. We do not expect to see any significant variation in volumes in the short-term.”

During April-July 2020, non-coking coal imports stood at 38.84 MT as compared to 60.97 MT imported in the corresponding period last year.

“Coking coal imports were at 10.67 MT during April-July, down from 17.73 MT imported during the same period last year,” mjunction services said.

The government had earlier mandated state-owned Coal India Limited (CIL), which accounts for over 80% of domestic coal output, to replace at least 100 MT of imports with domestically-produced coal in 2020-21.

CIL had last month said that coal production in some of the major mines is still affected due to high stock and less offtake.

Pithead stock of CIL as on July 16 was 72.88 MT as compared to 33.17 MT in the same period a year ago, it said.

The Mahratna firm had said that the despatch of coal was adversely affected in the last week of March resulting in mounting coal stock at pitheads.

Coal stock as on March 31, 2020, was 74.629 MT, compared to 54.155 MT on March 31, 2019.

The Centre had earlier asked power generating companies, including NTPC Limited, Tata Power and Reliance Power, to reduce import of the dry fuel for blending purposes and replace it with domestic coal.

The power sector is a key coal consumer.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also given directions to target thermal coal import substitution, particularly when huge coal-stock inventory is available in the country this year.

Coal minister Pralhad Joshi had earlier written to state chief ministers asking them not to import coal and take domestic supply from CIL, which has the fuel in abundance.

The country’s coal imports increased marginally by 3.2% to 242.97 MT in 2019-20.

Private Power Players Cry Foul at Proposed Changes to Centre’s Tariff Policy

The power ministry is considering exempting central utilities from mandatory bidding for power supply contracts.

New Delhi: Private power producers have opposed the proposed policy change to exempt central government generation utilities like NTPC and NHPC from bidding for electricity supply to power distribution companies (discoms), saying it could end up raising tariffs and hurt consumers if implemented.

Besides, they have argued, the policy proposal is discriminatory and could shrink business opportunities for the private sector.

A policy that makes it mandatory for private players to participate in bidding for electricity supply to discoms is in place since 2006. Despite their stated reluctance, central utilities were brought under the policy belatedly in 2011.

The union power ministry took that decision at the time based on advice from the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), which found that average tariff for a sample of 14 NTPC power plants was significantly higher compared to private generating stations.

However, the power ministry has now proposed to exempt them from compliance with the bidding guidelines. If that happens, electricity supply from central utilities’ plants would be fixed through mutual negotiations between generators and discoms.

State government-owned generators are already exempt from compliance with bidding guidelines.

The policy proposal is part of the comprehensive overhaul of the Centre’s Tariff Policy 2006 being undertaken by the Centre.

In a letter to Union power minister R.K. Singh, Association of Power Producers (APP), a lobby group of private power generators like Reliance Power, Tata Power and Adani Power, has opposed the policy proposal, terming it as a regressive step.

Pointing out that efficiency of power plants set up by private players, cost of generation has come down in last eight to nine years, APP director general Ashok Khurana has said, “It is surprising to note that contrary to the advice of CERC, the ministry of power is again proposing to reintroduce this regressive provision of cost-plus regime for central sector generating stations.”

Recalling that in the run up to the mandatory implementation of tariff bidding in 2010, NTPC signed PPAs for supply of electricity from projects worth 38,000 MW through negotiation route to avoid facing competition.

Khurana has also argued that the proposal would take away the flexibility from discoms to “optimise their power procurement plans”, which would hit their finances.

According to industry sources, NTPC has not signed PPA for any competitively bid project.

Khurana has alleged that NTPC has started implementing projects under joint venture route with states to stay under the cost-plus regime.

“Presently, with sufficient generation capacity available, such exemption from competitive framework is neither needed nor desirable. It would act as an obstacle for the development of power market and different market products therein which can serve the diverse need of power by different consumer categories,” cautions the letter.