Britain And The World Prepare To Bid Farewell To Queen Elizabeth II

Among the 2,000 in the congregation will be some 500 world leaders, from Biden and Emperor Naruhito of Japan to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Mark Brown, prime minister of Cook Islands.

London: Britain, world leaders and royalty from across the globe will on Monday bid a final farewell to Queen Elizabeth, the last towering figure of her era, at a state funeral of inimitable pageantry.

At 6:30 am (0530 GMT), an official lying-in-state period ended after four days in which hundreds of thousands have queued to file past the casket of Britain’s longest-reigning monarch at London’s historic Westminster Hall.

They, like many across the globe including US President Joe Biden, had wanted to pay tribute to the 96-year-old who had spent seven decades on the British throne.

“You were fortunate to have had her for 70 years,” Biden said. “We all were.”

Shortly before 11 am, the oak coffin, covered in the Royal Standard flag with the Imperial State Crown on top, will be placed on a gun carriage and pulled by naval personnel to Westminster Abbey for her funeral.

Among the 2,000 in the congregation will be some 500 world leaders, from Biden and Emperor Naruhito of Japan to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Mark Brown, prime minister of Cook Islands.

The queen’s great-grandchildren, Prince George, 9, and Princess Charlotte, 7, the two eldest children of now heir to the throne Prince William, will also be attending.

“Over the last 10 days, my wife and I have been so deeply touched by the many messages of condolence and support we have received from this country and across the world,” Charles, Elizabeth’s son and the new king, said in a statement.

“As we all prepare to say our last farewell, I wanted simply to take this opportunity to say thank you to all those countless people who have been such a support and comfort to my family and myself in this time of grief.”

Elizabeth died on September 8 at her Scottish summer home, Balmoral Castle.

Her health had been in decline, and for months the monarch who had carried out hundreds of official engagements well into her 90s had withdrawn from public life, although just two days before her death she had appointed Liz Truss her 15th and final prime minister.

“Invincible”

Such was her longevity and her inextricable link with Britain that even her own family found her passing a shock.

“We all thought she was invincible,” Prince William told well-wishers.

The 40th sovereign in a line that traces its lineage back to 1066, Elizabeth came to the throne in 1952, Britain’s first post-imperial monarch.

She oversaw her nation trying to carve out a new place in the world, and she was instrumental in the emergence of the Commonwealth of Nations, now a grouping comprising 56 countries.

When she succeeded her father George VI, Winston Churchill was her first prime minister and Josef Stalin led the Soviet Union. She met major figures from politics to entertainment and sport including Nelson Mandela, Pope John Paul II, the Beatles, Marilyn Monroe, Pele and Roger Federer.

Despite being reputedly just 5ft 3ins (1.6m) tall, she dominated rooms with her presence and became a towering global figure, praised in death from Paris and Washington to Moscow and Beijing. National mourning was observed in Brazil, Jordan and Cuba, countries with which she had little direct link.

“Queen Elizabeth II was without any shadow of a doubt the best known figure in the world, the most photographed person in history, the most recognisable person, and the fact that world leaders are going to be pouring into London for the funeral … is saying a lot about this iconic figure,” historian Anthony Seldon told Reuters.

Transport chiefs said one million people were expected in central London for the funeral, while police say it will be the biggest security operation ever in the capital.

People on the way into London spoke of their motivations for being there ranging from a sense of taking part in history, expressing national pride and honouring a woman who had led Britain through so much change over the decades.

Alistair Campbell Binnings, 64, said he left his home in Norfolk at midnight to make his way to London.

He added that he had not been to a royal wedding or funeral before, but he felt compelled to be in the capital for the funeral.

“This is a one-off. We would only be here for the queen. We just felt we had to be here. She was what we always needed in a time of crisis.”

King Charles, his siblings and sons Princes William and Harry and other members of the Windsor family will slowly walk behind the coffin as it is taken on the gun carriage to Westminster Abbey, led by some 200 pipers and drummers.

The tenor bell of the Abbey – the site of coronations, weddings and burials of English and then British kings and queens for almost 1,000 years – will toll 96 times.

“Here, where Queen Elizabeth was married and crowned, we gather from across the nation, from the Commonwealth, and from the nations of the world, to mourn our loss, to remember her long life of selfless service,” David Hoyle, the Dean of Westminster will say.

In addition to dignitaries, the congregation will include those awarded Britain’s highest military and civilian medals for gallantry, representatives from charities supported by the queen, and those who made “extraordinary contributions” to dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Two minute silence

Tens of millions in Britain and abroad are expected to watch the funeral of the monarch, something which has never been televised before. It will end with the Last Post trumpet salute before the church and the nation falls silent for two minutes.

Afterwards, the coffin will be brought through central London, past the queen’s Buckingham Palace home to the Wellington Arch at Hyde Park Corner, with the monarch and the royal family following again on foot during the 1.5 mile (2.4 km) procession.

From there, it will be placed on a hearse to be driven to Windsor Castle, west of London, for a service at St. George’s Chapel. This will conclude with the crown, orb and sceptre – symbols of the monarch’s power and governance – being removed from the coffin and placed on the altar.

The Lord Chamberlain, the most senior official in the royal household, will break his ‘Wand of Office’, signifying the end of his service to the sovereign, and place it on the casket.

It will then be lowered into the royal vault as the Sovereign’s Piper plays a lament, slowly walking away until music in the chapel gradually fades.

Later in the evening, in a private family service, the coffin of Elizabeth and her husband of more than seven decades Prince Philip, who died last year aged 99, will be buried together at the King George VI Memorial Chapel, where her parents and sister, Princess Margaret, also rest.

“We’re so happy you’re back with Grandpa. Goodbye dear grannie, it has been the honour of our lives to have been your granddaughters and we’re so very proud of you,” grandchildren Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie said.

(Reuters)

Londoners Protest After Police Officer Charged With Woman’s Murder

Sarah Everard’s disappearance as she walked home on the evening of March 3 had led to a wave of accounts from women about the dangers of walking streets alone at night, and dismay at the failure of police and wider society to tackle this.

London: Police in London clashed with mourners and protesters on Saturday after more than a thousand people gathered to mark the killing of a 33-year-old woman, hours after the police officer charged with her murder appeared in court.

Sarah Everard’s disappearance as she walked home on the evening of March 3 had led to a wave of accounts from women about the dangers of walking streets alone at night, and dismay at the failure of police and wider society to tackle this.

Early on Saturday an impromptu memorial with flowers and candles sprang up around the bandstand on Clapham Common in southwest London, near where Everard was last seen alive.

Kate, Britain’s Duchess of Cambridge, was among those who paid their respects. A palace official said Kate “remembers what it was like to walk around London at night before she was married”.

By late Saturday around a thousand people – mostly women – gathered at the site to pay their respects and protest at the lack of security they felt when out alone. Some chanted “shame on you” at police who were present.

Campaign groups had wanted to organise a formal vigil, but London’s Metropolitan Police said people should not gather due to coronavirus restrictions. The head of the force, Cressida Dick, said any vigil “would be unlawful and would be unsafe”.

As tensions mounted, Reuters witnesses saw police drag several women away from the gathering on Clapham Common.

Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner Helen Ball said four people were arrested for public order offences and breaches of the Health Protection Regulations.

“We absolutely did not want to be in a position where enforcement action was necessary,” Ball said in a statement. “But we were placed in this position because of the overriding need to protect people’s safety.”

London Mayor Sadiq Khan – who is responsible for policing in the city – said the officers’ response “was at times neither appropriate or proportionate” and added that he was seeking an urgent explanation from Dick.

A sign is seen as people gather at a memorial site in Clapham Common Bandstand, following the kidnap and murder of Sarah Everard, in London, Britain March 13, 2021. Photo: Reuters/Hannah McKay

Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the scenes “deeply disturbing” and Conservative interior minister Priti Patel said she too wanted answers from police about “upsetting” images.

Earlier on Saturday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he and his partner Carrie Symonds would light a candle in memory of Everard.

“I will do everything I can to make sure the streets are safe and ensure women and girls do not face harassment or abuse,” he said.

Appearing at London’s Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Saturday morning, 48-year-old police officer Wayne Couzens, wearing a grey tracksuit, spoke only to confirm his identity.

Couzens’s lawyer did not enter a plea to the charges of kidnap and murder ahead of a fuller court hearing scheduled for Tuesday. Couzens remains in custody.

Police discovered Everard’s body on Wednesday in woodland about 50 miles (80 km) southeast of London. The court heard that her body was found in a builder’s refuse bag, and was identified using dental records.

Couzens joined the Metropolitan Police in 2018 and guarded foreign embassies before his arrest.

England’s police watchdog has launched an investigation into the Metropolitan Police’s handling of the case.

(Reuters)

Thousands Protest in London Against India’s Farm Laws, Several Arrested

The protest comes after a group of 36 British MPs had written to UK foreign secretary Dominic Raab, asking him to make representations to his Indian counterpart.

New Delhi: Scotland Yard has reportedly made a number of arrests after it warned of enforcement action ahead of thousands of protesters from different parts of the UK gathering outside the Indian High Commission in central London on Sunday, as a show of support for farmers demonstrating against agricultural reforms in India.

Several police officers in face masks descended upon Aldwych to police the ‘We stand with farmers of Punjab’ demonstration, having warned that strict regulations remain in place to help prevent the spread of coronavirus and therefore demonstrations of larger than 30 risk arrests and fines.

The Metropolitan Police had said a robust policing plan will be in place throughout Sunday and officers will take action if they witness breaches of the regulations.

The Metropolitan Police said that 13 people in total were arrested for breach of COVID-19 regulations. Four of them were subsequently de-arrested after they provided their details to officers and were issued a fine. The other nine remain in custody.

Watch: ‘If Modi Comes, We’ll Feed Him As Well,’ Say Protesting Farmers

Three teenagers who were seen to set off a firework towards a crowd were spoken to by police and the fireworks were confiscated from them. They were not arrested and police said that there had been no reported injuries from the demonstration.

“We had issued a reminder urging those who were planning to attend to reconsider but, unfortunately, a number of people decided not to follow that advice. A proportionate policing plan was in place, the demonstration has now concluded and those in attendance have begun to leave,” said Met Police Commander Paul Brogden.

“If you attend a gathering that breaches the regulations, you may be committing an offence, which is punishable by a fine. In certain circumstances, if you hold a gathering of over 30 persons and you do not meet the requirements of the regulations you might be committing a different offence, which is also punishable by a fine,” he said.

Also read: Why Justin Trudeau Is Supporting Protesting Farmers in India

“I would strongly urge anyone who is planning to come to the Aldwych area to reconsider. I would also encourage anyone who is currently in attendance to leave the area. Our officers will take the appropriate action where necessary,” he said.

The demonstration, largely made up of British Sikhs, involved placard waving with messages such as Justice for Farmers and sloganeering as well as several cars blocking roads.

A poster on display during the farmers protest. Photo: Twitter/@RKDasgupta

“Our High Commission has been coordinating closely with the authorities concerned and we will, together with them, address the issues that have come up for example how this gathering of thousands could take place without specific permission,” an Indian High Commission spokesperson said. The spokesperson also blamed “anti-India separatists” for the protests.

The High Commission reiterated the government’s stance that the protest against agriculture reform bills in India is part of an internal democratic process.

Also read: ‘We Have to Look After Our Homes as Well as the Movement’: Women at Farmers’ Protest

The protest comes after a group of 36 British MPs led by British Sikh Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi had written to UK foreign secretary Dominic Raab asking him to make representations to his Indian counterpart S. Jaishankar on the impact on British Punjabis affected by the demonstrations by farmers in India.

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has said that while it is yet to receive the letter, the matter is an internal issue for India. The police handling of protests are a matter for the government of India, an FCDO spokesperson said.

The Indian mission in the UK said it has comprehensively briefed the relevant interlocutors in the UK government and Parliament on the fundamental features of the path breaking farming sector reforms initiated by the government of India.

Thousands of farmers are protesting on various borders of Delhi since November 26, seeking repeal of three farm laws enacted in September. Dubbing these laws as “anti-farmer”, these farmers claim that the newly enacted legislations would pave the way for the dismantling of the minimum support price system, leaving them at the “mercy” of big corporations.

In talks with the Centre, farmers have refused to accept anything except the complete withdrawal of the laws.

(With PTI inputs)

After Unfavourable Extradition Ruling, What Will Mallya Do Next?

The last stage is the Supreme Court. However, as per British statute, appeals to Supreme court would require a certification from High Court that the case involves a point of law of public importance.

Note: This story was first published in December 2018 after Mallya lost his extradition hearing at the magistrate court level.  It is being republished in light of his appeal being dismissed also at the High Court level on April 20, 2020 (Monday). 

New Delhi: The ruling of the Westminister Magistrates’ Court to extradite fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya is a shot in the arm for the Narendra Modi government.

However, while Mallya has not yet announced his next course of action, UK law allows him to deploy few more legal steps to avoid return to India.

As per UK’s 2003 extradition act, India is a ‘Category 2’ country, which require assent for extradition from both the judiciary and the secretary of state for the home department (Sajid Javid).

Once a court decides that a person can be extradited, the secretary of state has to order extradition within two months, though extensions can be sought from the high court.

If the secretary of state does not take a decision within two months, the person could be discharged.

If there is no appeal, Mallya has to be extradited within 28 days of the secretary of state’s decision.

Mallya can only appeal after he has taken permission from the High Court within two weeks. But, the appeal hearing will only be scheduled by High Court after the Secretary of State orders the extradition.

The home secretary does not have much political discretion in extradition matters.

As per law, he can refuse extradition only if the requested person faces death penalty, there is no “speciality arrangement” with the requesting country and the person has already been extradited to a third party.

If none of these three prohibitions apply, the secretary of state has to compulsorily order extradition.

The requested person can only appeal against the secretary of state’s extradition order. But both the appeals – against the lower court decision and against the secretary of state – will heard at the same time by the High Court after it grants permission.

The last stage is the Supreme Court. However, as per British statute, appeals to Supreme court would require a certification from High Court that the case involves a point of law of public importance.

From Parliament to the Streets, London Takes Note of the Delhi Riots and CAA

Hundreds of Indian students and diaspora took to the streets outside the High Commission of India in London on Saturday in an “emergency” protest, and British politicians have been raising the issue both inside as well as outside Westminster.

London: The anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests and the riots in Delhi are having reverberations in the United Kingdom. Hundreds of Indian students and diaspora took to the streets outside the High Commission of India in London on Saturday in an “emergency” protest, and British politicians have been raising the issue both inside as well as outside Westminster.

House of Commons

On Thursday, Labour MP Khalid Mehmood told the House of Commons that “over the last few days Delhi has been burning at the hands of Hindu extremism” and urged the government to make a statement and debate the matter. Jacob Rees-Mog, the leader of the House, responded with: “The seriousness of what he (Mahmood) is mentioning in the House has not passed the government by.”

It would be wrong to assume that the criticism of the CAA is limited to the Labour party or the Liberal-Democrats. Steve Baker, a Conservative MP who is also closely associated with the influential European Research Group, as early as December 20, 2019 asked in the House of Commons whether the UK government had made an assessment of the effect the CAA would have on the human rights of Muslims in India. Labour MP Lyn Brown asked a similar question in the House of Commons on the same day.

Watch | Delhi Riot Survivors Feel ‘Abandoned and Stunned’: Farah Naqvi

Heather Wheeler, junior minister in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, replied that the British high commissioner and the deputy high commissioners are following “reports on the continued protests” and “raise issues with Indian officials where appropriate.” Baker has continued to use social media to highlight the anti-CAA protests in India.

House of Lords

A detailed discussion took place in the House of Lords on Tuesday, when the Earl of Sandwich, a cross bench peer, raised the issue. Displaying a close reading of the imbroglio in India, he spoke about the riots and protests in Aligarh and Delhi, and said that “five states” have refused to implement the law.

Referring to India’s founding leaders, he said that “it is doubtful that any of those leaders would be satisfied with the situation today”. He also referred to Khushwant Singh and R.K. Laxman and ended his speech with: “Will the [British] government now urge Mr Modi to carry out a review of the CAA and its effects on Indian society?”

Protest outside the Indian high commission in London. Photo: Ruhi Khan

He was followed by Lord Alton of Liverpool, who described the CAA and the proposed nationwide National Register of Citizens as a “draconian law that is communal and unconstitutional in its nature”. He told the House that “the promotion of majoritarian communalism, based on anti-minority rhetoric, has been evident since 2014, when the Bharatiya Janata Party came to power”.

Lord Alton referred to the role played by the RSS and the need to follow the constitution. “At a time when hate and intolerance are so much in evidence in many parts of the world, often fanned by xenophobic agendas, we must as India’s good friend urge its government not to abandon the high ideals of its constitution.”

Also read: A Hindu-Owned Parking Garage, a Muslim-Owned Footwear Shop and a 2 km Stretch of Riot Hell

Lord Raj Loomba, defended the CAA and said that it was passed by the Parliament and is “by no means anti-Muslim or discriminatory”. “India is the historical home of Hindus and Sikhs, and it is these minorities who have naturally migrated there,” said Lord Loomba, adding that “no Muslim country would either accept them or give them citizenship.”

Lord Meghnad Desai, one of the longest serving Indian-origin members of the House of Lords, said that there was a conjectural fear in India but it should be borne in mind by the British government that neither the CAA nor the NRC have been implemented. “The fear about this Act, which is quite genuine and has been expressed in a number of demonstrations, arises from what has happened in Assam.”

Other speakers included Lord Singhm who criticised the Indian government and referred to Amit Shah referring Muslims as “termites who should be thrown into the Bay of Bengal”.

Baroness Sugg, junior minister in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, representing the government accepted that the issue is divisive and that the UK government have concerns about the impact of the legislation. She also quoted Nehru (“whatever our religion or creed, we are one people”) to drive home the point of India being a secular democracy. She said that the British government had raised the issue with the UP administration for the first time on February 6.

Beyond Westminster

On the same day that Mahmood raised the issue in Westminster, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Party leader, at a gathering said that in India, the human rights of everybody must be respected and protected. He spoke about how Hindus and Muslims “plough the same field, eat the same rice, cook the same dal, they live together and work together. So any citizenship law must respect that diversity, the right of free speech the right of assembly, the right to practise the religion you believe in.” Corbyn indicated that he would raise the issue in June at the UN convention in Geneva.

Also read: Ground Report: Brahmpuri’s Memories of Unity Lie Forgotten on Either Side of Barricades

Other MPs like Zarah Sultana from Coventry South took to social media to liken the Delhi violence to “Gujarat (2002), Mumbai (1992) and Delhi (1984)”. Tanmanjeet Singh Deshi, from Slough, recalled how the “incited violence in Delhi on basis of faith brings back painful memories of 1984 Sikh genocide. We must learn from history, not be fooled by those who aim to divide society, hell-bent on killing and destroying religious places – in the name of religion”. Nadia Wittome, MP from Nottingham East, called the “Delhi pogrom” as “no accident”. “The horrific scenes in Delhi show BJP ideology in action. British Indians will not be silent,” she said.

Another Labour MP, Yasmin Qureshi, wrote a letter dated February 16, 2020 to the Indian high commission saying that “she was deeply concerned that anyone who questions the policy of the government risk being labelled anti-national” and “being subjected to harassment and brutal attack by nationalistic groups.” “I urge you on behalf of thousands of my constituents from the Indian diaspora do not abandon the high ideals of your constitution.”

Outside India House

On Saturday, as hundreds gathered outside India House, joining protests across 17 other cities in the world including Berlin, Brussels, Geneva, Hague, Munich and Paris to expressed solidarity with the victims of the Delhi violence. The protests in London was organised by South Asia Solidarity Group, SOAS India Society, South Asian Students Against Fascism (UK), Federation of Redbridge Muslim Organisations (FORMO) and Co-ordinating Committee of Malayali Muslims.

“The violence in Delhi must not be seen as a riot. What has happened is a state-sponsored pogrom against the city’s Muslim communities,” said the South Asian Students Against Fascism. Catch Watch’s Satpal Muman condemned “the despicable and barbarous actions of all those people who killed innocent” in what was a “well-orchestrated, well planned” action. SOAS India society expressed their anguish over how the rule of law in India “has been suspended” and warned that “if the world does not take note and react urgently, the consequences will be disastrous.”

‘Only Friend I’d Skip School For’: Malala Yousafzai Meets Greta Thunberg at Oxford

The two young women are famous for leading global movements in their respective fields of climate change and women’s education.

London: Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg met Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai at Britain’s University of Oxford on Tuesday and posed for a photo together.

Yousafzai, widely known by her first name, Malala, is a student at the University of Oxford. The 22-year-old posted a photo on Instagram of herself and Thunberg sitting on a bench with their arms around each other, with a caption “Thank you, @gretathunberg” and a heart emoji.

Thunberg, 17, is in the United Kingdom to join a school strike in Bristol on Friday.

Both women shot to worldwide fame after standing up for major global issues: climate change and women’s education.

Also read: Teenage Climate Activist Greta Thunberg is Time’s Person of the Year

Thunberg became a household name after skipping school in Sweden to protest against climate change, while Malala was shot in the head by the Taliban in Pakistan for campaigning for girls to be allowed to go to school.

In 2014, Malala became the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for her advocacy of education. She became a global symbol of the resilience of women in the face of oppression.

Thunberg was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2019 and 2020.

The pair met to discuss their activism at Lady Margaret Hall, Malala’s Oxford college. Thunberg also talked to some of the students about climate change and protest.

The college’s master, Alan Rusbridger, posted a photo of Thunberg on his own Instagram and Twitter, saying that he was honoured to host Thunberg and grateful that she found time to talk to the students.

Malala also posted the photo on Twitter and commented: “She’s the only friend I’d skip school for.”

Sam Mendes’ World War Drama ‘1917’ Wins BAFTA For Best Film

The film is a frontrunner for the Oscars too.



World War I drama 1917 has won the award for best film at the British Academy of Film and Television Arts Awards (BAFTAs), with director Sam Mendes picking up honours for best director at Sunday’s glamorous ceremony in London.

The immersive war epic, based on the wartime experiences of Mendes’ grandfather, also picked up five further awards making it the big winner of the night, beating off US contenders JokerThe Irishman and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

The film tells the story of two British soldiers on a perilous mission across no man’s land to try to avert a suicidal offensive, and shot in long, uninterrupted takes, the film was also honoured for its cinematography and production design, sound and visual effects.

Also read: The Unfortunate Ironies of the 2020 Oscar Nominations

Joaquin Phoenix was named best actor for Joker, and Renee Zellweger took home the best actress prize for the Judy Garland biopic Judy.

The British awards are often seen as a forerunner to Hollywood’s Academy Awards,  which will be held this year on February 9.

The film 1917 also took home awards for cinematography, production design, sound and visual effects.

Lack of diversity?

A lack of diversity dominated discussion ahead of the BAFTAs. The rising star award, the one trophy decided by the public, went to black British actor Micheal Ward, but awards organisers called it “disappointing” that there were no performers of colour among the acting nominees.

Nominees for the BAFTAs are chosen by 6,500 Academy members who work in the UK and international film industry.

British star Cynthia Erivo, who is Oscar-nominated for her performance as abolitionist Harriet Tubman in Harriet but who was ignored by the BAFTAs, declined an invitation to perform at Sunday’s award ceremony in protest.

The article first appeared on DW.

UK PM Boris Johnson Defeated on Brexit Legislation for First Time Since Election

The upper chamber voted in favour of a move to protect the rights of EU citizens in Britain after Brexit.

London: British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government was defeated in parliament on Monday for the first time since a December election, with the upper chamber voting in favour of a move to protect the rights of EU citizens in Britain after Brexit.

Johnson’s Conservatives won a large majority in the lower chamber, the House of Commons, at the Dec. 12 vote and lawmakers there quickly approved the legislation needed to ratify his exit deal with Brussels earlier this month.

The legislation is now passing through the House of Lords, where the government does not have a majority. While the upper chamber is not expected to block passage of the bill, it is seeking to make changes.

Members of the Lords voted by 270 to 229 in favour of a change put forward by the pro-EU Liberal Democrats which would give eligible EU citizens in Britain an automatic right to stay after Brexit, rather than having to apply to the government to do so.

It would also ensure they are given physical proof of their right to remain. The government has said only that people will be given a “secure digital status” which links to their passport.

Last week, European Parliament Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt said Britain had told him it was looking into the possibility of providing a physical document to EU citizens but Johnson’s spokesman said he was not aware of any plans.

The government later suffered two further defeats in the Lords, over the power of British courts to depart from judgements of the European Court of Justice after Brexit.

It is facing another defeat on Tuesday, when members are due to vote on an amendment which would ensure protections for child refugees, a promise made by Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, but absent from his legislation.

Any changes to the legislation made by the House of Lords have to go back to the House of Commons to be approved and could still be overturned.

London: Indian Students, Diaspora Organise Sit-In Outside High Commission

The protestors expressed solidarity with the nationwide strike in India and opposed the CAA, NRC, while condemning the attacks on students.

London: Indian students brought the hugely successful Occupy Gateway of India mode of protest to London, staging a sit-in at the India House. Protesting students and members of the diaspora organised a sit-in outside the High Commission of India on January 8 from 8 am to 8 pm with a line up of poets, artists, students and academics speaking on a whole gamut of topics, holding teach-ins and performances that show resistance to the “Indian government’s repressive moves and brutal crackdown across universities and minority communities”.

This protest was held to express solidarity with the national strike in India on Wednesday, where an estimated 25 crore people of the working class protested against the “anti-people, anti-worker” policies of the government. Students joined in to demand equality and affordability of education and democracy and gender sensitisation on campuses in India. The strikes also protested against the draconian Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) that threaten to divide India along communal lines.

Protesting students outside India House. Photo: Ruhi Khan

Rahul Rao, a senior lecturer in politics at SOAS, spoke about how the citizenship law in India has changed over the post-independence period. Calling Anupama Roy’s book Mapping Citizenship in India, a sort of a “biography” of the Citizenship Act, Rao recounted the ways in which the Act has been amended.

Regarding the current situation, Rao argued that “the cumulative result of the restriction of citizenship of those within the state and an extension of citizenship to those outside the state” shows how the Indian citizenship law “is increasingly beginning to resemble a form of Zionism”.

Also read: Indian Students, Workers in London Protest Against CAA, NRC

There is a great influence of Bhagat Singh’s thought in these protests, said Chris Moffat, a British Academy postdoctoral fellow at of Queen Mary’s University, London. Moffat argued that Bhagat Singh was a compelling figure for those interested in politics because “he is an icon of heroic commitment to a cause and of self-sacrifice who stood up against tyranny speaking truth to power” and in that way encouraged protesters to keep fighting using slogans like ‘Inquilab Zindabad’ which challenge power and authority.

“We are challenging these monuments of power like the India House erected by the government, first the colonial government then inherited by the post-colonial governments, and affirming instead the potential of the crowd, of the street,” said Moffat

Protest outside India House. Photo: Ruhi Khan

Moffat also spoke about how right-wing forces in recent decades “hold onto Bhagat Singh as a masculine vigilante figure” and this needed to be challenged. “A battle about history is also a battle about the present. The contemporary moment is haunted by the past, the dead are angry.”

Slogans of Azaadi and Halla Bol echoed along the busy Aldwych road. Kurdish students dropped in to wish Indian students the best with their protest and said azaadi was also an important word in Kurdish movements. “The most important slogan in our movement is Jin, Jiyan, Azadi – Women, Life, Freedom – and also Berxwedan Jiyane – Resistance is Life. With these slogans I want to show solidarity and here’s to building a revolution of people of internationalism against all these oppressive states,” said a member of the London Kurdish Society.

To understand how and why fascism is rising in India, we need to go beyond the BJP, argued Waseem Yaqoob, who teaches history of political thought at Queen Mary’s University. “The connection between colonial rule, fascism and India needs to be made and needs to be understood. Kashmir, from the very start, was a colonial occupation, not in the simple sense that a government that does not represent the will of the people but of a government that uses the tools of the empire, the harshest and the most brutal tools to implement a communal war in Kashmir.”

Protesters outside the High Commission of India in London. Photo: Ruhi Khan

Annapurna Menon of Westminster spoke about the right-wing Hindutva presence in the UK

Also read: CAA Protests: Indian Students Worldwide Raise Voices in Solidarity

Many more spoke about fascism, the idea of a university, Dalit struggles and even India-Iran relations. LSE researchers Niharika Pandit and Priya Raghavan recited Pash’s poem ‘Sabse khatarnaak hota hai’ while a political theatre, hosted by Sara Kazmi of Cambridge and Adrija Dey of SOAS, unveiled a performance of Faiz Ahmed Faiz’s poem ‘Hum Dekhenge’.

The Occupy India House protest saw the idea of JNU’s open-air protest lectures successfully manifest on a chilling winter day in London. Indian students on foreign shores united with their counterparts in India, joining the collective resistance and rage against an oppressive system.

Indian Students, Workers in London Protest Against CAA, NRC

Protesters believe these policies suppress the rights of the minorities in India including the Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis.

London: Hundreds of Indian students and diaspora stood outside the High Commission of India in London on Wednesday evening, in the cold and rain, to protest against the Citizen Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC). They believe these policies suppress the rights of the minorities in India including the Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis.

The protesters in London also expressed solidarity with the students of Jamia Millia Islamia and Aligarh Muslim University and others who encountered police brutality, and with the many other protestors in India who are taking to the streets on Thursday, raising their voice against the CAA and NRC.

Also read: CAA Protests: Airtel and Vodafone Says Data, Voice and SMS Services Suspended in Parts of Delhi

At the protest, songs of ‘azadi’ echoed, the preamble of the constitution was read and the national anthem sung. Meena Kandasamy read a poem in Tamil and English called ‘We are not the Citizens’, a Kashmiri speaker described what it was like being “caged” in the Valley, and a group of Keralites joined the protest sloganeering in Malayali. Some European students were seen punching the air and shouting ‘Halla Bol’, expressing solidarity with their Indian friends. Many students travelled from outside London to be a part of this protest.

People protest in London. Photo: Ruhi Khan

The London protest was organised by the South Asian Solidarity Group and SOAS India Society. They strongly condemned the CAA and opposed plans to implement the NRC.

“In India under Narendra Modi’s regime we have seen alarming suppression of dissent along with sustained efforts to reinforce Brahmanical Hindutva ultra-nationalist ideologies and the vision of a regressive purist Hindu nation. The violent attacks by the police and military on peaceful protests is yet another blatant display of the Indian Government’s repressive and autocratic nature,” read a joint statement issued by the organisers.

The Indian Workers’ Association, which joined the protests in London, said the NDA government’s “tide of anti-Muslim acts” as enforcement of their Hindutva ideology and advocacy was “a very dangerous path to the two nation theory”.

People protest in London. Photo: Ruhi Khan

Indian student societies and academics at University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, LSE, UCL, King’s College, Goldsmith University, University of Westminster and others have also signed petitions and issued statements supporting the students right to dissent in India and against the police brutality during protests. In a statement, the University and College Union raised concerns with the CAA and urged the Indian government to “fully investigate allegations of violence and sexual harassment by police against students”.

Also read: An Unnatural Politics and the Madness of the Indian State

“We are saddened that this spirit of unity is under threat, and we hope that the right to peaceful protest is upheld,” read a statement issued by the Oxford India Society. National Indian Students and Alumni Union (NISAU) called on Narendra Modi and Amit Shah to stand with peaceful protestors and urged them to “take immediate and considerate action” against Delhi police.