Despite Slowdown, RBI Chooses Not to Cut Interest Rates, But Allows One-Time Restructuring of Loans

Under the newly announced scheme, a resolution plan for personal loans may be invoked till December 31 and will be implemented within 90 days thereafter.

New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India’s monetary policy committee (MPC) on Thursday afternoon decided to leave key policy rates unchanged even as the economy faces a sharp downturn due to the lockdown imposed to contain the novel coronavirus pandemic.

Over the last few months, the central bank panel had effected two emergency rate cuts in a bid to bolster economic sentiments. On Thursday, however, the MPC decided to keep the benchmark repo rate unchanged at 4%, which is at its lowest level in two decades, and reverse repo rate at 3.35%.

More importantly, in view of the pandemic, the RBI also announced plans to allow lenders to provide a restructuring facility on some loans that were standard as on March 1, 2020.

An expert committee will be set up under K.V. Kamath to work out modalities and look into resolution plans of eligible borrowers.

The decisions were announced after the 24th bimonthly meeting of the RBI’s six-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), headed by RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das.

Repo rate is the rate at which the RBI lends to commercial banks, and reverse repo is the rate at which it borrows from them.

Also read: ‘Moratorium Extension Will Determine Economic Recovery in India’

The RBI had last revised its policy rate on May 22, in an off-policy cycle, to perk up demand by cutting interest rate to a historic low.  Das said the MPC voted to keep interest rate unchanged and continue with its accommodative stance to support growth.

“Global economic activity has remained fragile. A surge in COVID-19 cases has subdued early signs of revival, said Das, adding: “Economic activity had started to recover, but a surge in infections has forced the imposition of lockdowns.”

Supply chain disruptions were persisting and inflationary pressures were evident across segments, he said.

In its outlook for the rest of the year, the MPC noted that inflation was expected to remain elevated in the second quarter of 2020-21 and ease thereafter in the second half of the year. On the economic growth front, Governor Das said, without putting any number to it, that India’s real gross domestic product would contract in the first half of FY21 as well as full financial year.

Among other key measures announced by the RBI, additional special liquidity facility of Rs 5,000 crore each will be provided to the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Nabard) and the National Housing Bank (NHB). The RBI would also amend priority-sector lending guidelines to remove regional disparity – a higher weight would be accorded to districts with lower credit flows. The start-up sector has been included as a priority sector and the cap on credit to the renewable energy sector has been raised. And, to ease some stress on households in the wake up of the coronavirus pandemic, the cap on loans against gold has been enhanced from 75% to 90% of the value.

Amid fast-changing macroeconomic environment and a deteriorating outlook for growth, the MPC has had to hold off-cycle meetings in March and May this year. The MPC has cumulatively cut the repo rate by 115 basis points in these two meetings, taking the total policy rate reduction since February 2019 to 250 basis points.

A shopkeeper swipes a customer’s debit card with the logo of RuPay at an electronics goods store in Kolkata, October 31, 2018. Photo: REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri

According to a research report by State Bank of India, the country’s largest lender, banks have cut rates on fresh loans by 72 basis points, the fastest transmission ever recorded, during this period. SBI itself has cut by an equivalent 115 basis points on its repo-linked retail loan portfolio.

In the run-up to the announcement, experts had mostly been divided over the possibility of a rate cut, with many ruling it out saying a call on restructuring of loans and discontinuation of moratorium was more likely. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had said that focus was now on restructuring. “The focus is on restructuring. The finance ministry is actively engaged with the RBI on this. In principle, the idea that there may be a restructuring required is well taken,” she had said last week.

The six-month moratorium given by the RBI ends on August 31. Rating agency Icra had said in a report on Wednesday that an extension of moratorium and one-time restructuring of loan could pose challenges to lenders and also impact their financial stability if the quantum was large.

A Business Standard poll of 10 economists and bond market participants had seemed geared in favour of a pause in rate cut. Of the 10, three had expected a cut, while seven had said there would be a pause. All the three bond market participants polled had expected a pause.

Also read: RBI Acts By Cutting Rates Again, but Will this be Enough to Kickstart Lending?

Personal loan help

Under the newly announced scheme, a resolution plan for personal loans may be invoked till December 31 and will be implemented within 90 days thereafter. Borrowers whose accounts are classified standard, but not in default for more than 30 days as of March 31, will be eligible for restructuring.

According to the RBI guidelines, lenders may reschedule payments of the borrower, convert the interest accrued or interest that will accrue into another credit facility. Furthermore, the plan may entail granting of moratorium to borrowers, based on assessment of income streams of the borrower, subject to a maximum of two years, and the loan tenor can be modified accordingly. The moratorium period, if granted, will come into force immediately upon implementation of the resolution plan.

A shopkeeper arranges face masks at his shop in Jabalpur, June 2, 2020. Photo: PTI

According to Krishnan Sitaraman, senior director, CRISIL Ratings, “Retail borrowers have faced stress because of the pandemic, resulting in their debt servicing ability being significantly impacted. The moratorium gave them some relief in terms of repayment, but the restructuring will give them long-term relief.”

Also watch | Former Deputy RBI Governor Viral Acharya on India’s ‘Deep’ Banking Sector Problems

However, he added that the economic challenges will result in asset quality issues manifesting itself. The retail segment is not insulated from it, as borrowers face cash-flow issues. While retail has been considered a safe segment, bad debts in retail will go up proportionately more than the other segments. In other segments, non-performing assets (NPAs) are already high. The RBI measures will help to cushion that impact.

Anil Gupta, vice-president and sector head–financial sector ratings, ICRA, said, “The debt restructuring for personal loans will be a breather for the retail segment under stress due to job/business losses and salary cuts. It will allow retail borrowers to recoup the losses. Two years of the moratorium is a substantial time within which we can expect the economy to recover somewhat.”

The RBI’s financial stability report had revealed as much as 80% of individual borrowers of public sector banks and 42% of private sector banks had opted for the moratorium as of April 30. Since then, banks have revealed their books under moratorium have shrunk, but borrowers under the retail segment opting for the moratorium are relatively higher than the borrowers in the corporate segment, indicating cash-flow issues for individual borrowers.

“The personal loan resolution framework will cover a bulk of existing loans sanctioned to individual borrowers with respectable repayment track record. It will help them repay their loans according to the changed repayment capacity caused due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Naveen Kukreja, chief executive officer (CEO) and co-founder, PaisaBazaar.

A man wearing face mask walks past a shop displaying colourful face masks at Gandhi Nagar textile-cloth wholesale market, on May 28. Photo: PTI

It will also provide major relief to lenders and reduce financial stability risks to the overall economy, as most lenders were expecting a major spike in their NPAs after the end of the loan moratorium facility, added Kukreja.

Lenders are expected to keep provisions higher than held under IRAC norms, or 10% of the renegotiated debt exposure of the lending institution post implementation of resolution plan. Half of the provisions may be written back upon the borrower paying at least 20% of the residual debt without slipping into NPA post implementation of the plan, and the remaining half may be written back upon the borrower paying another 10% of the residual debt without slipping into NPA subsequently.

Not only borrowers, lenders with significant retail exposure are expected to benefit from this move.

According to ICICI Direct Research, addressing hardship faced by retail borrowers amid the pandemic is a positive for lenders with substantial retail exposure, including HDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Bajaj Finance, and State Bank of India.

Furthermore, the RBI decided to increase the permissible loan-to-value ratio (LTV) for loans against pledge of gold ornaments and jewellery for non-agricultural purposes, from 75% to 90%. This relaxation will be available till March 31, 2021; beyond that, it will be again back to 75%.

Experts said the increase in LTV for gold loans is a surprising move. Since it is for a short period of time, lenders who wish to take risks may opt for it by giving shorter duration of loans — say six months. This has been done to provide liquidity to retail borrowers to help them tide over the crises.

A labourer carries vegetable oil packets on a tricycle at a wholesale market in Kolkata, India. Photo: REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri/File

Zarin Daruwala, CEO, Standard Chartered India, said household finances will get a boost, with the increase in the loan to value of gold loans.

Kukreja said, “A higher LTV ratio will not only help borrowers avail of higher loan amounts, it may also provide relief to existing gold loan borrowers in case of any steep correction in gold prices in the near term.”

According to C.V.R. Rajendran, managing director and CEO, CSB Bank, “This step by the RBI will place more money in the hands of borrowers. While this move will help broaden the gold loan market, we will also witness increased competition in this segment. Lenders will need to ensure their valuation and risk management processes remain tight and robust.”

(With inputs from Reuters and by arrangement with Business Standard)

India’s GDP Could Contract 5.3% Due to COVID-19 ‘Disorder’: India Ratings

GDP will also contract in each quarter in FY21, the agency predicted.

New Delhi: India’s real gross domestic product in Financial Year 2020-21 could contract 5.3%, said India Ratings and Research on Wednesday as it flagged the “disorder” caused to the economy by Covid-19 and the nationwide lockdown to contain the disease.

“This will be the lowest GDP growth in Indian history and the sixth instance of economic contraction, others being in FY58, FY66, FY67, FY73 and FY80,” said the ratings agency in a press release. It expects nominal GDP to contract 3.4% for the year and gross value added to contract by 5.5%.

“The disorder caused by the Covid-19 pandemic unfolded with such a speed and scale that the disruption in production, breakdown of supply chains/trade channels and total wash out of activities in aviation, tourism, hotels and hospitality sectors will not allow the economic activity to return to normalcy throughout FY21,” the agency said.

“As a result, besides contracting for the whole year, GDP will contract in each quarter in FY21. However, the agency believes the GDP growth would bounce back in the range of 5 per cent-6 per cent in FY22, aided by the base effect and return of gradual normalcy in the domestic as well as global economy.”

The estimate for FY22 is much lower than what other forecasts say. Some estimates expect the low-base effect to push GDP growth for FY22 to as high as 8-9%. Separately, the government still expects that growth will bounce back in the second half of FY21, though it agrees with the Reserve Bank of India’s statement that GDP will contract this year.

“The credit and liquidity enhancing measures announced in the government’s economic package in combination with some of the earlier steps announced by the RBI will certainly address the supply-side issues of the economy. The Indian economy even before the COVID-19 related lockdown was suffering on the demand were floundering,” the agency said.

“The lockdown and its impact on economy and livelihoods only aggravated the sagging consumption demand. Ind-Ra believes the government is aware of it; but, the near absence of demand-side measures in the economic package indicates the hard budget constraint facing the government,” it said.

The agency also said that the fiscal deficit of the central government in FY21 is expected to more than double to 7.6% of GDP from the budgeted estimate of 3.5% of GDP. The majority of the fiscal slippage will be from the revenue side, it said.

By arrangement with Business Standard.

More Rise in Cash Circulation Between January and April Than Entire 2019: RBI

The rise in currency in circulation is perplexing since it generally rises in tandem with the growth in economic activities, as people need cash to transact.

Mumbai: Rising economic uncertainties forced people to hoard more cash in the first four months of the calendar than they had done in the entire 2019, data released by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) shows.

The increase in currency in circulation between January and May 1 was Rs 2.66 trillion. In comparison, it increased by Rs 2.40 trillion in the entire 2019 (January to December).

The rise in currency in circulation (CIC) is perplexing when economic activities have nosedived. Generally, CIC should rise in tandem with the growth in economic activities, as people need cash to transact. The demand for currencies also generally spikes during the festive season, and during elections.

However, the increase in CIC without any such events, and that too when economic activities have shrunk, means people are withdrawing a large amount of cash and keeping it with them, instead of depositing it with banks.

Experts say this reflects uncertainties, if not distrust in the banking system. But the rise in CIC itself is going to pose a challenge for the banking regulator.

Banks had parked Rs 8.53 trillion of their excess liquidity with the central bank as of Tuesday, data showed. It is so because banks don’t want to lend and find it convenient to keep their surplus money with the RBI, earning just 3.75% interest. Now, if the lockdown is lifted and the economy starts to function normally, people will want to use their cash, and likely deposit them back.

This will push up the banking system liquidity even further. Banks are unlikely to start lending, and companies themselves also won’t want to increase their debt when there is huge excess capacity lying unutilised.

Also read: Longer Working Hours, Employee Productivity and the COVID-19 Economic Slump

Some of the large surpluses that banks are parking with the central bank has also been caused by the long-term repo operations (LTRO) undertaken by the central bank between February and March this year. The central bank had infused about Rs 1.25 trillion through the original LTRO.

“Amid unusual condition, the RBI can allow banks to repay back the money by providing Call option for the regular LTRO auction conducted between February and March 15. This will reduce pressure on the RBI to sterilise money through reverse repo by providing securities. And in case demand for credit improves, banks can still borrow from LTRO,” said Soumyajit Niyogi, associate director at India Ratings and Research.

That could address some of the concerns for sure, but banks will still have a huge liquidity surplus to park. However, the central bank may not have adequate bonds to support this kind of liquidity operation, considering it has about Rs 9-10 trillion worth of bonds in its books, of which about Rs 2 trillion it generally maintains as a buffer.

This may force the central bank to also come up with additional policy measures that would prevent banks from sitting idle on their cash.

It can cap how much banks can keep their money in the reverse repo window. Or it can introduce a standing deposit facility (SDF) under which the RBI can accept as many surplus funds banks have to offer, but at a rate lower than the reverse repo rate (which is currently at 3.75%). The RBI can use both the reverse repo cap and also the SDF. And it can also charge banks for keeping money with the central bank, say, economists.

But economists also say that banks will still not lend as long as the government doesn’t come up with a stimulus package.

“Bankers are possibly also scared about what will happen to them after the loans go sour. There is a complete risk aversion unless the government instructs banks to do some targeted lending,” said a senior economist.

By arrangement with Business Standard.

Centre May Breach Fiscal Deficit Target for 2018-19, Says India Ratings

Higher spending and a potential revenue shortfall could force the Narendra Modi government to cut capital expenditure.

New Delhi: The Narendra Modi government could fail to meet its fiscal deficit target in 2018-19 for a third year in a row, according India Ratings and Research, a credit rating agency.

The rating agency has projected that the Centre’s revenue spending could shoot up due to various factors including  implementation of the Ayushman Bharat scheme and a steep hike in the minimum support price (MSP) of kharif crops.

This spending – combined with a potential revenue shortfall – could force the government to cut capital expenditure in order to balance its budget.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley has budgeted a fiscal deficit of Rs 6.24 lakh crore, or 3.3% of the GDP, for this year.

Also read: GST Collections for First Six Months of Fiscal Year Fall Short of Target by Rs 22,000 Crore

But current fiscal trends show the deficit could balloon to Rs 6.67 lakh crore, or 3.5% of the GDP, India Ratings said on Monday.

The Finance Bill 2018 said, “Central government shall take appropriate measures to limit the fiscal deficit up to 3% of GDP by 31 March 2021.”

It further stated:

“The central government shall prescribe the annual targets for reduction of fiscal deficit for the period beginning from the date of commencement of Part XV of Chapter VIII of the Finance Act, 2018, and ending on 31 March 2021, provided that exceeding annual fiscal deficit target due to ground or grounds of national security, act of war, national calamity, collapse of agriculture severely affecting farm output and incomes, structural reforms in the economy with unanticipated fiscal implications, decline in real output growth of a quarter by at least 3% points below its average of the previous four quarters, may be allowed for the purposes of this section.”

However, nothing extraordinary has happened so far this year that would justify a breach of budgeted fiscal deficit target.

But the government is still staring at the prospect of overshooting the fiscal deficit set for this year, Devendra Pant, chief economist, India Ratings and Research, said, flagging concern over the precarious state of Centre’s finances.

The rating agency has forecast revenue shortfall of Rs 22,400 crore, mainly arising from newly introduced Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. As The Wire has reported, other estimates by think-tanks and rating agencies place the revenue shortfall even higher, at anywhere between Rs 50,000 crore to Rs 1 lakh crore.

Although the introduction of e-way bills has helped the government plug leakages in GST collection, aggregate indirect tax collections (union excise duties, customs, service tax and GST) grew only 4.3% during April-September 2018 as against the budgeted growth of 22.2% for the full fiscal.

Also read: Where Is the Indian Economy Headed?

Non-tax revenue collections are also likely to be Rs 16,200 crore less than the budgeted target of Rs 2.45 lakh crore.

The shortfall in non-tax revenue is feared due to lower than budgeted dividend payouts by the central bank, state-owned banks and financial institutions; lower revenue receipts from communication services; and shortfall in divestment proceeds.

On Sunday, in an interview with a television channel, Jaitley stated that the Centre did not need any “extra funds” from the Reserve Bank of India or any other institution to meet its fiscal deficit target.

India’s Banks May Need At Least $2.8 Billion Extra Provisioning for Bankruptcy Cases

The extra provisioning needed would reduce the profits of creditor banks by about a quarter in the financial year to March 2018, according to India Ratings.

The extra provisioning needed would reduce the profits of creditor banks by about a quarter in the financial year to March 2018, according to India Ratings.

A cashier displays the new 2000 Indian rupee banknotes inside a bank in Jammu, November 15, 2016. Credit: Reuters/Mukesh Gupta

A cashier displays the new 2000 Indian rupee banknotes inside a bank in Jammu, November 15, 2016. Credit: Reuters/Mukesh Gupta

Mumbai: Indian banks taking 12 of the country’s largest defaulters to bankruptcy court under a central bank directive, will need to make additional provisioning of at least Rs 180 billion, India Ratings and Research said on Tuesday.

India Ratings, an affiliate of Fitch Ratings, estimated the current average provisioning towards those 12 accounts at 42%, adding the extra provisioning needed would reduce the profits of creditor banks by about a quarter in the financial year to March 2018.

The Reserve Bank of India last month asked creditor banks to begin insolvency proceedings against 12 of the country’s biggest loan defaulters, and subsequently mandated that the banks would need to make provision for up to 50% of the amount of soured loans.

The 12 companies account for Rs 1.78 trillion rupees in non-performing bank loans, according to RBI data.

Banks had total non-performing loans of about Rs 7.29 trillion, or 5% of the gross domestic product, as of end-March.