India Lodges ‘Strong’ Protest Over UK Envoy’s Visit to Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir

Justifying her visit to Mirpur, an area claimed by India, Marriott said that since ‘70% of British Pakistani roots are from Mirpur’, it was crucial for her to work together with the interests of the diaspora.

New Delhi: India on Saturday (January 13) summoned the UK’s high commissioner to India, Alexander Ellis, to protest a visit earlier this week by the UK’s Pakistan envoy to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) as “unacceptable”.

The Indian protest was lodged three days after the UK’s high commissioner to Pakistan, Jane Marriott, had visited Mirpur on January 10.

“India has taken a serious note of the highly objectionable visit of the British High Commissioner in Islamabad, along with a UK Foreign Office official, to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on 10 January 2024. Such infringement of India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity is unacceptable,” said a statement by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).

“The Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are, have been and shall always remain an integral part of India,” added the MEA.

The Indian foreign secretary, Vinay Kwatra, lodged the protest with Ellis.

Last year, US ambassador Donald Blome had visited the Gilgit and Hunza valleys ostensibly with the agenda of addressing climate resilience.

India had lodged a protest over his visit with the US, but New Delhi had not announced whether the US ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti, was summoned.

MEA spokesperson Arindam Bagchi had then said, “We have objections regarding the visit and the meetings in PoK by the US envoy and we have conveyed the same.”

Marriott had framed her visit to Mirpur as a diaspora outreach exercise.

“Salaam from Mirpur, the heart of the UK and Pakistan’s people-to-people ties! Seventy per cent of British-Pakistani roots are from Mirpur, making our work together crucial for diaspora interests. Thank you for your hospitality!” said Marriott, also the first woman British high commissioner to Pakistan, on her January 10 visit.

According to a press release by the UK high commission in Islamabad about the Mirpur visit, the British diplomat was “delighted to gain insight into how cross-cultural influences had shaped Mirpur into the city it is today”.

Accompanied by the head of the Pakistan department at the UK’s Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office, Richard Lindsay, she also met with the political leadership of PoK, which Pakistan terms as Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Marriott’s outreach exercise also created a storm among Hindutva activists on social media.

Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif Thanks Narendra Modi for Concern Expressed Over Floods

Floods triggered by unprecedented monsoon rains have caused widespread havoc across Pakistan, killing over 1,100 people and displacing 33 million or one-seventh of the country’s population.

Islamabad: Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday thanked his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi for his concern over the human and material losses caused by the devastating floods, saying his country will overcome the adverse effects of the natural calamity.

Floods triggered by unprecedented monsoon rains have caused widespread havoc across Pakistan, killing over 1,100 people and displacing 33 million or one-seventh of the country’s population.

“I thank Indian PM Narendra Modi @narendramodi for condolences over the human & material losses caused by floods. With their characteristic resilience the people of Pakistan shall, InshaAllah, overcome the adverse effects of this natural calamity & rebuild their lives and communities,” Sharif said in a tweet.

Prime Minister Modi on Monday said he was saddened to see the devastation caused by the floods in Pakistan and hoped for an early restoration of normalcy.

“Saddened to see the devastation caused by the floods in Pakistan. We extend our heartfelt condolences to the families of the victims, the injured and all those affected by this natural calamity and hope for an early restoration of normalcy,” Modi had tweeted.

The two leaders exchanged messages as Pakistan was weighing the option of allowing imports of essential items from India after floods ravaged vast swathes of agricultural land, destroying crops.

Also Read: Pakistan Floods: Islamabad to Consider Importing Vegetables From India

Finance minister Miftah Ismail on Wednesday said that the issue would be discussed with coalition partners and key stakeholders. The idea to import edible goods from India was first floated by Ismail on Monday.

Grappling with unprecedented floods, the cash-strapped Pakistan government on Tuesday teamed up with the United Nations to issue a flash appeal for USD 160 million to deal with the disaster.

Relations between India and Pakistan have often been strained over the Kashmir issue and cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan.

However, the ties between the two countries nosedived after India abrogated Article 370 of the constitution, revoking the special status of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcating the state into two Union Territories on August 5, 2019.

India’s decision evoked strong reactions from Pakistan, which downgraded diplomatic ties and expelled the Indian envoy. India has repeatedly told Pakistan that Jammu and Kashmir was, is and shall forever remain an integral part of the country.

India has said it desires normal neighbourly relations with Pakistan in an environment free of terror, hostility and violence.

(PTI)

NSA Ajit Doval Calls for Enhancing Afghanistan’s Capability to Counter Terrorism

Speaking at the 4th Regional Security Dialogue on Afghanistan, Doval said the foremost priority should be ‘the right to life and a dignified living as well as protection of human rights of all the people in Afghanistan.’

Dushanbe: India was and is an important stakeholder in Afghanistan, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval said on Friday and called for enhancing the capability of the war-torn country to counter terrorism and terrorist groups which pose a threat to regional peace and security.

Speaking at the 4th Regional Security Dialogue on Afghanistan in Tajikistan’s capital Dushanbe, Doval said that India has historical and civilisational relations with Afghanistan and New Delhi has always stood by the people of Afghanistan and it will continue to guide India’s approach.

“The special relationship with the people of Afghanistan over centuries will guide India’s approach. Nothing can change this,” Doval told the meeting which was attended by his counterparts from Tajikistan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Iran, Kyrgyzstan and China.

While discussing the situation in the war-torn country and the region with his regional counterparts here, Doval emphasised that India was and is an important stakeholder in Afghanistan.

The top security officials, who discussed the situation in Afghanistan and the region, highlighted the need to find constructive ways to ensure peace and stability in Afghanistan and combating risks from terrorism emanating from the region, sources said.

“There is a need for all present at the Dialogue to enhance capability of Afghanistan to counter terrorism and terrorist groups which pose a threat to regional peace and security,” Doval said.

He said the foremost priority should be the right to life and a dignified living as well as protection of human rights of all the people in Afghanistan.

“Assistance should be accessible to all, respect for all obligations under international humanitarian law should be ensured, he added.

India has focused on infrastructure, connectivity and humanitarian assistance in Afghanistan over the decades.

Also read: India’s Wheat Consignment to Afghanistan Marks Rare Instance of Cooperation with Pakistan

After August 2021, India has already provided 17000 metric tonnes of wheat out of a total commitment of 50000 MT, 500000 doses of Covaxin, 13 tonnes of essential life saving medicines and winter clothing as well as 60 million doses of polio vaccine.

Doval also highlighted the need for representation of all sections of Afghan society including women and minorities so that the collective energies of the largest possible proportion of the Afghan population feel motivated to contribute to nation building.

“Women and youth are critical for the future of any society. Provision of education to girls and employment to women and youth will ensure productivity and spur growth. It will also have a positive social impact including discouraging radical ideologies among youth, he said.

“With collective efforts of Regional Dialogue members, we can help proud people of Afghanistan to build a prosperous and vibrant nation once again, he said.

Doval also met his counterparts from Iran, Tajikistan, Russia and other partners in the Dialogue on the sidelines of the meeting.

The dialogue is aimed at firming up a common approach for practical cooperation in confronting increasing threats of terrorism, radicalisation and drug trafficking following the Taliban’s takeover of Kabul in August last.

India had hosted the dialogue in November 2021 in New Delhi which was attended by eight nations including Iran and Russia.

Fifty Trucks Carrying 2,500 MT Wheat from India Reach Afghanistan Via Pakistan

Afghanistan’s Ambassador to India Farid Mamundzay said the convoy arrived in the Afghan city of Jalalabad and that the aid would now be distributed by the World Food Programme among people.

New Delhi: The first shipment of 2,500 metric tonnes of wheat sent by India for Afghan people via Pakistani land route as part of its humanitarian aid reached Jalalabad in Afghanistan on Saturday, February 26.

Afghanistan’s Ambassador to India Farid Mamundzay said the convoy of 50 trucks carrying the wheat arrived in the Afghan city and that the aid would now be distributed by the World Food Programme (WFP) among the people.

The shipment was part of the commitment made by the government of India to supply 50,000 metric tonnes of wheat for the people of Afghanistan.

Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, along with Mamundzay and WFP Country Director Bishaw Parajuli, flagged off the convoy of trucks at a ceremony at Amritsar’s Attari border crossing on Tuesday.

“The first convoy of 2500 MT of wheat assistance reached Jalalabad this morning,” the Afghan envoy said on Twitter.

He said the WFP in “Afghanistan would now be distributing this aid to thousands of needy families across Afghanistan”.

Also read: India’s Wheat Consignment to Afghanistan Marks Rare Instance of Cooperation with Pakistan

India had sent a proposal to Pakistan on October 7 last year, seeking the transit facility to send 50,000 tonnes of wheat to the people of Afghanistan via Pakistan and it received a positive response from Islamabad on November 24.

Following the Pakistani response, both sides were in touch to finalise the modalities for the transportation of the shipments.

Each of the bags was stamped with the text: “Gift from the people of India to the people of Afghanistan” in English, Pashto and Dari.

On February 12, the Indian government had inked a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the WFP for the distribution of wheat within Afghanistan.

The Ministry of External Affairs said on Tuesday that India decided to “gift” the wheat to the people of Afghanistan in response to appeals made by the United Nations for humanitarian assistance to the war-torn country.

India has already supplied five lakh doses of Covaxin vaccines and 13 tonnes of essential lifesaving medicines to Afghanistan.

The last consignment of medical supplies was delivered last Saturday. It was the fifth consignment of humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.

India has been pitching for providing unimpeded humanitarian aid to Afghanistan to address the unfolding humanitarian crisis in the country.

India has not recognised the new regime in Afghanistan and has been pitching for the formation of a truly inclusive government in Kabul, besides insisting that Afghan soil must not be used for any terrorist activities against any country.

India’s Wheat Consignment to Afghanistan Marks Rare Instance of Cooperation with Pakistan

The shipment is part of the commitment made by India to supply 50,000 metric tonnes of wheat to strife-torn Afghanistan.

New Delhi: In a rare instance of cooperation in the tense relationship between the two neighbours, India sent the first shipment of 2,500 metric tonnes of wheat for Afghanistan through Pakistani territory on Tuesday, February 22.

In a ceremony held in Amritsar, Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla along with Afghan Ambassador Farid Mamundzay and World Food Programme’s Country Director Bishaw Parajuli flagged off the first convoy of 50 trucks carrying the consignment.

India had sent a proposal to Islamabad on October 7 seeking a transit facility to send 50,000 tonnes of wheat to the people of Afghanistan via Pakistani soil. It received a positive response on November 24.

Following this, both sides were in touch to finalise modalities for the transportation of the grains.

“The shipment is part of the commitment made by the Government of India to supply 50,000 metric tonnes of wheat for the people of Afghanistan. The wheat assistance will be delivered in multiple consignments and will be handed over to the United Nations World Food Program (WFP) in Jalalabad, Afghanistan,” the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.

India signed an agreement with the WFP to distribute 50,000 MT of wheat last week.

The wheat of the Rabi market season of 2020-2021 has been procured by the Food Corporation of India and packed in 50-kilogram jute bags for transportation.

As per sources, efforts have been made to ensure the longevity of the food grains, starting with double bagging to prevent moisture and infection and fumigation of the consignation.

FCI will be providing the necessary phytosanitary and fit-to-consume certificates. A WFP-approved laboratory will also perform additional testing. “Guidelines for necessary precautions to preserve the consignment during passage would be given to the Afghan transport agency”.

The shelf-life of the wheat is a minimum of one year.

On 50 Afghan trucks, the shipment will travel through Pakistan to Jalalabad in Afghanistan, where it will be handed over to World Food Programme.

In a statement, the MEA said India remains committed to its special relationship with the people of Afghanistan.

“In this endeavour, India has already supplied 5,00,000 doses of Covaxin, 13 tonnes of essential lifesaving medicines and 500 units of winter clothing. These consignments were handed over to the World Health Organisation at the Indira Gandhi Hospital, Kabul,” it said.

The last consignment of medical supplies was delivered on Saturday, February 19. It was the fifth consignment of humanitarian aid to that country.

India has been pitching for unimpeded humanitarian aid to Afghanistan to address the unfolding humanitarian crisis in the country.

India has not recognised the new regime in Afghanistan and has been pitching for the formation of a truly inclusive government in Kabul besides insisting that Afghan soil must not be used for any terrorist activities against any country.

Farid Mamundzay is still recognised as the Afghan ambassador by India, even though he was appointed by former president Ashraf Ghani.

(With PTI inputs)

Indian Wheat Supply to Afghanistan via Pakistan to Start Early February

India had sent a proposal to Pakistan on October 7 seeking a transit facility to send 50,000 tonnes of wheat and life-saving medicines to the people of Afghanistan via Pakistani soil.

New Delhi: The supply of 50,000 metric tonnes of Indian wheat for Afghanistan will likely start from early next month with preparations  in their final stage, officials indicated on Friday.

Sources told The Wire that India has already signed contracts with Afghan transporters for thousands of trucks to pick up wheat from the India-Pakistan border and transport it through Pakistani territory. The wheat will be then handed over to UN agencies like the World Food Programme for distribution in Afghanistan.

However, several complicated logistics still need to be smoothened out, which includes ensuring that a steady supply of wheat reaches the border from the godowns of the Food Corporation of India (FCI). But, these preparations are in the final stages, with the first supply run to start in early February, they said.

The indication of an imminent commencement of the supply came against the backdrop of Pakistan stating that it was still awaiting a response from India on the modalities to start the deliveries.

“We have conveyed to India necessary details of arrangements put in place by Pakistan, and for about three weeks now, are awaiting further response from India on the date of dispatch and other information regarding the first consignment,” said Pakistan foreign office spokesperson Asim Iftikhar Ahmad on Friday.

India had sent a proposal to Pakistan on October 7 seeking a transit facility to send 50,000 tonnes of wheat and life-saving medicines to the people of Afghanistan via Pakistani soil. Pakistan on November 24 agreed to allow Afghan trucks to pick up wheat from the Wagah border. Islamabad’s permission was necessary as Pakistan does not allow two-way trade between India and Afghanistan through its territory.

Also read: Explained: India Voted Yes in UNSC on Aid Exemption to Afghanistan, but Dissatisfaction Remains

Last month, India reiterated that it had been in touch with Pakistani authorities over the modalities. “It is a complex operation, and I would request you to be patient,” MEA spokesperson told reporters at a media briefing.

The two South Asian countries continue to have a tense relationship, with the lowest point in recent years being the cross-border airstrikes in 2019.

The return of the Taliban in Afghanistan is seen as a triumph for Pakistan, which has supported the insurgent group over the years. The fall of the Afghan republic meant that there was no longer a friendly government in Kabul, which was crucial for India’s security interests.

India also offered the wheat to the Taliban during a meeting on the sidelines of the multilateral Moscow format consultations on October 20. That was the first time that an Indian official delegation had formally met with a senior Taliban leader after the new dispensation took over on August 15.

The Taliban takeover led to the snapping of international banking channels and freezing of overseas financial assets, which has crippled economic activity. This is coupled with the country facing the worst drought in 27 years.

According to the United Nations, Afghanistan now has the highest number of people in emergency food insecurity in the world, with around 24.4 million people in humanitarian need.

OIC Secretary-General Meets With Indian Ambassador, Raises Kashmir and Status of Indian Muslims

The Indian embassy nor the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has issued any public statement regarding the meeting.

New Delhi: The executive head of the Islamic bloc, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), raised the status of Indian Muslims and proposed to send a delegation to Jammu and Kashmir during his meeting with the Indian ambassador earlier this week.

The OIC press release notes that the Indian ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Ausaf Syed, paid a “courtesy visit” on secretary-general Yousef Al-Othaimeen on July 5 in Jeddah.

“The Secretary General welcomed Ambassador Sayeed and reviewed with him a number of issues concerning the situation of Muslims in India, along with the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, and relevant UN and OIC resolutions opposing any unilateral actions on the issue,” said the press note.

It is highly unusual for the Indian ambassador to have a meeting with the OIC secretary-general.

The Indian embassy nor the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has issued any public statement regarding the meeting.

Two years ago, then Indian external affairs minister Sushma Swaraj became the first Indian minister to attend a meeting of the OIC at the invitation of the host, the United Arab Emirates. It had been considered a major diplomatic victory for India. In protest, Pakistan boycotted the plenary of the Council of Foreign ministers in March 2019

However, India has not got a repeat invitation to an OIC meeting after that.

The OIC has also continued to issue boilerplate resolutions on Kashmir after their meetings, followed by rejoinders from India.

India’s traditional stance is that that the OIC has no locus standi on the issue of Kashmir, as that region is an integral part of the country. New Delhi has also called on OIC to not make “unwarranted” references to India in resolutions and regretted that the body is “used” by Pakistan.

According to the press note issued by OIC, the secretary-general “conveyed the desire of the OIC General Secretariat to dispatch a delegation to the disputed territory in line with relevant resolutions of the OIC Council of Foreign Ministers”.

He also suggested that the OIC could be a go-between for India and Pakistan. “The Secretary General also asked about the possibility of a meeting between Pakistan and India, stating that the General Secretariat stands ready to assist if the two parties would so request,” said the press release.

The Pakistan foreign ministry issued a statement on Wednesday stating that the “Secretary General underscored the OIC’s principled position on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute during the meeting” with the Indian envoy.

Pakistan also claimed that this was the “first time that the principled position of the 57 OIC members states has been duly conveyed to India”.

‘Let Not Despair Imprison Our Words’: Remembering Ali Sardar Jafri, 20 Years On 

The Sardar of Progressive poetry, who gave it new facets with his powerful imagery, preferred to recite verses on the battlefield of existence than seek gratification.

Har cheez bhula di jaayegi
Yaadon ke haseen butkhane se
Har cheez utha di jaayegi
Phir koi nahin yeh poochhega
Sardar kahan hai mehfil mein

(Every memory will be erased from the beautiful temple of memories
Every single thing will have gone
Then, no one will ask:
Where is Sardar in the soiree?)

The writer, orator, poet, short-story writer, dramatist, critic and filmmaker, Ali Sardar Jafri, who passed away in Mumbai 20 years ago on August 1, never received his due as a poet, perhaps due to his programmatic verses and his overt association with the Communist Party of India.

In his later years, he received some recognition as a poet who wrote optimistically about Indo-Pak relations. When Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee took a bus journey to Pakistan in 1999, the following four-liner by Jafri was played on its PA system, and became quite the rage for a while:

Tum aao Gulshan-e-Lahore se chaman bardosh
Hum aayen subh-e-Banaras ki raushni le kar
Himalaya ki havaaon ki taazgi le kar
Phir is ke baad ye poochen ki kaun dushman hai?

(Come bearing the fragrant garden of Lahore
And we will bring the light of a Banaras morning
And the fresh breeze from the Himalayas
And then let us ask: who is the enemy?)”

Jafri was not only among the founders of the Progressive Writers’ Movement; he raised the standard of Progressive literature with his powerful imagery, giving it new meanings and facets.

He began his career as a fiction writer, but later moved to poetry. He also wrote a few plays for the Indian People’s Theatre Association (IPTA). He was jailed twice: by the British during 1940–41, for the crime of making a speech at the height of opposition to the imperialist war and by the government of independent India in 1949 for espousing the cause of socialism.

Also read: Jaun Elia: A Communist Poet Who Found Religion and Marxism Compatible

In the first instance, the chargesheet against Sardar was so flimsy that had he fought the case, he would have definitely been released. However, in keeping with the tradition of opposition to the colonial power he said in full court that he did not recognise the court or its law, therefore the question of presenting a defence did not even arise. He was sentenced to six months of hard labour. He was kept in Lucknow jail for several days and then sent to prison in Banaras.

By the time Sardar was released, the complexion of World War II had changed due to Hitler’s attack on the Soviet Union. And, crushing Malaya and Burma, the Japanese forces had reached the borders of Assam.

Ali Sardar Jafri. Photo: YouTube video screengrab

Clearly, it was not the time to be a fence-sitter. His book, Lucknow Mein Paanch Raaten (Five Nights in Lucknow), talks about his days in Lucknow when the training of squads by the Communist Party as part of mobilisation for the War effort, had commenced. He too joined the effort and began to write anti-fascist dramas and speeches for radio. It was at that time that the mushaira which Sardar Jafri has mentioned in the book, was held.

Then, in 1949,  in a moment that reminds us of Frantz Fanon’s account of the betrayal of that moment of decolonisation by local elites, Jafri was arrested by the Indian government for being a supporter of socialism, joining colleagues like Faiz and Sajjad Zaheer who had suffered similar incarceration in Pakistan.

Also read: Looking for Each Other, the Historical Task of the Hindu and Muslim

In later years, like a good communist, he also aroused the ire of religious fundamentalists and was subjected to death threats in the 1980s when he came out against the treatment of divorced women under the Muslim Personal Law. His opposition to the infamous Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act in 1986 earned him the ire of Muslim communalists. The sight of Jafri being shouted at, slapped and garlanded with slippers by goons was a moment that further politicised many college students, motivating them to stand firmly against the atmosphere of rapidly increasing communalism in India.

Ultimately, we must remember that Jafri led a celebrated life – the Jnanpith award was bestowed on him for the year 1997. In 2013, on the occasion of his birth centenary, a website was inaugurated by the Sardar Jafri Foundation.

Jafri’s long poem Karbala – recited by him – is available in the public domain. I have chosen to translate one of his poems called Guftagu Band Na Ho (Let Not the Conversation Cease), speaking of the possibilities of more harmonious Indo-Pak relations.

Before sharing my translation of this poem, just to give readers a taste of the Urdu idiom, I want to share the opening stanza of the poem, which is also how the poem closes:

Guftagu band na ho
Baat se baat chale
Subh tak shaam-e-mulaaqaat chale
Hum pe hansti hui ye taaron bhari raat chale

(Let not the conversation cease
Let one word lead to another
And let our evening tryst go on till dawn
While the starry night-sky smiles down on us
Though we have hurled the stones of bitter words at each other
We have swirled poison in our goblets in the form of sarcastic jibes
Our brows furrowed, our gazes venomous
But be that as it may, let hearts awaken in chests
Let not despair imprison our words
Whoever the murderers are, let them not kill dialogue
If that is done, a word of faith may escape at dawn
Love will arrive on trembling legs
Eyes downcast, hearts aflutter, lips atremble
Silence will then be fragrant like a kiss on the lips
And the only sound left will be that of buds flowering

And then there will be need for neither word nor talk
In the movement of the gaze, an emotion will sprout
Tenderness will be our guest, hate will be asked to leave

Hand in hand, accompanied by the whole world
Bearing the gift of pain, and the bounty of fondness
We will cross the deserts of animus
And find ourselves on the other side of oceans of blood

Let not the conversation cease
Let one word lead to another
And let our evening tryst go on till dawn
While the starry night-sky smiles down on us.)”

Also read: As We Celebrate Urdu, Let’s Not Ignore the Signs of Its Decline in India

Another poem of his, Avadh ki Khaak-e-Haseen (The Beautiful Land of Avadh), is a beautiful exemplar of Jafri’s Progressive poetry, which turned labour into romance and ordinary folk into protagonists. In Urdu it begins thus:

Ye seedhe saadhe ghareeb insan, nekiyon ke mujassame hain
Ye mehnaton ke khuda, ye takhleeq ke payambar
Jo apne haathon ke khurdarepan se aindagi ko sanvaarte hain
Lohaar ke ghan ke neeche lohe ki shakl tabdeel ho rahi hai

A longer excerpt of the poem follows in English translation below:

(These simple poor folk are the epitome of goodness
These gods of labour, these prophets of creation
Who make life beautiful with their calloused hands
Under the blacksmith’s anvil, iron is changing shape
The potter’s wheel hums
And goblets dance to its beat
The white flour emerges from the black millstone like a musical note
Flowers of fire bloom in stoves and ovens
Cooking utensils sing along
Skillets black with smoke laugh with lips made of sparks
Dupattas hang on ropes
And from their borders, a row of drops falls to the ground
On the hearts of these golden streets
The red borders of black long skirts shine on
How beautiful is this simplicity!
I sit in my prison cell and often wonder
That if I could, I would take the beautiful earth of my Avadh in my lap
And light up its beautiful, shimmering forehead
With thousands of kisses.)”

Baba-e-Urdu Maulvi Abdul Haq used to say, be wary of the person who is praised by all or who agrees with everyone. In the course of his long life, Jafri’s ill-wishers often accused him of being very arrogant or inflexible; and after his death he is not remembered in the same way as some of his more ‘humble’ and ‘flexible’ peers.  But then the intent of the minstrel of revolution was not to find favour in everybody’s eyes but to tell the truth.

In many circles, there was much antipathy towards the human values and life-giving forces with which Sardar had a loyal and deep association. The view in those circles was that a poet should neither have a life anchored to ideals nor have any business feeling the sorrows and joys, hopes and wishes of the wretched of the earth.

Also read: Lenin in Urdu: His Every Word Became Poetry

But it was precisely this exercise of truth that gave life to Sardar Jafri’s art. His art reflected the voice of his conscience and his philosophy of life, which was based on struggle. He always preferred to recite verses on the battlefield than seek gratification. However, those who were lucky enough to know him personally would testify that if Sardar was hard like steel on the battlefield of existence,  he was even softer  than silk at the banquet of beauty and love.

All translations from the Urdu are by the writer.

Raza Naeem is a Pakistani social scientist, book critic and award-winning translator and dramatic reader currently based in Lahore, where he is also the President of the Progressive Writers Association. He can be reached at: razanaeem@hotmail.com

Pakistan Summons Indian Diplomat Over ‘Ceasefire Violations’

According to Pakistan’s Foreign Office, India’s deputy high commissioner Gaurav Ahluwalia was told that the alleged ceasefire violations by India are a threat to regional peace and security.

Islamabad: Pakistan on Wednesday summoned India’s deputy high commissioner Gaurav Ahluwalia and condemned the alleged ceasefire violations by Indian troops along the Line of Control (LoC) that killed two persons, including a toddler.

Pakistan’s Foreign Office said that in the meeting, director general (SA & SAARC) Mohammad Faisal told Ahluwalia that the ceasefire violations by India are a threat to regional peace and security and may lead to a strategic miscalculation.

Faisal “condemned the unprovoked ceasefire violations by the Indian occupation forces” on August 27 in Nekrun sector, the Foreign Office said and claimed that two civilians, a man identified as Abdul Jalil and a three-year-old girl, were killed and three others sustained serious injuries in the firing.

It also claimed that in a separate cross-border firing in the Chirikot sector, a four-year-old boy sustained serious injuries.

“The Indian occupation forces along the LoC and Working boundary have continuously been targeting civilian populated areas with artillery fire, heavy-caliber mortars, and automatic weapons, which still continues,” Faisal said.

On Tuesday, a defence spokesperson in Jammu said that Pakistan troops violated the ceasefire by targeting forward posts with mortar shells and small arms along the LoC in Jammu and Kashmir’s Poonch district.

The cross-border firing by Pakistan started at about 6:30 pm and ended at 8:00 pm, he said, adding that the Indian Army retaliated befittingly.

(PTI)

A Lesson From Colombia For Modi on the Strategy of Talking While Fighting

Colombians tested a new approach to ending violence: fight terror as if there are no negotiations, negotiate as if there is no terror.

Colombia’s innovative approach to peacemaking could help India rethink its policy on dialogue with Pakistan.

Colombia's President Juan Manuel Santos and Marxist FARC rebel leader Rodrigo Londono, known as Timochenko, shake hands after signing a peace accord in Bogota, Colombia November 24, 2016. Credit: Reuters/Jaime Saldarriaga

Colombia’s President Juan Manuel Santos and Marxist FARC rebel leader Rodrigo Londono, known as Timochenko, shake hands after signing a peace accord in Bogota, Colombia November 24, 2016. Credit: Reuters/Jaime Saldarriaga

“Terror and talks can’t go together” is the Modi government’s alliterative mantra on dialogue with Pakistan. When India’s leaders chant this zealously from podiums in Nizamabad, Astana and New York, the logic seems unassailable. But the time is ripe for New Delhi to rethink this policy, for the government to recognise that it should not stop talking to Pakistan until the last roots of violence have been eliminated. Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos’s recent success in negotiating an end to civil war in his country should persuade Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take a chance on this counter-intuitive strategy.

The Colombian approach

“Colombians thought it was impossible but we did it,” Santos said, while speaking at Harvard University on September 20. “Every conflict can be resolved. But it needs political will and courage.” Santos received the Harvard program on negotiation’s “Great Negotiator Award” for his role in ending the 52-year civil war with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) that killed more than 220,000 Colombians. Over six years, he oversaw a painstaking negotiation process that resulted in a comprehensive peace agreement spanning issues from drug trafficking to gender parity. Although serious implementation challenges remain, the agreement’s greatest success lies in ending the violent phase of the conflict. The last remaining FARC fighters laid down their arms in June.

Colombians tested a new approach to ending violence: fight terror as if there are no negotiations, negotiate as if there is no terror. Santos’s government agreed to a two-way ceasefire only as the last step of a six-year negotiation. Nonetheless, both parties remained committed to talks despite spectacular acts of violence. The FARC, for example, did not break off talks even after Santos ordered the ruthless elimination of its top leader in 2011. Similarly, Santos resisted immense public pressure to stop negotiations after the FARC’s bloody ambush on 12 sleeping soldiers in 2015.

Talking while fighting with Pakistan

In Kashmir, a 2003 ceasefire across the “Line of Control” still holds on paper. But every time talks begin, they are predictably disrupted by violent episodes – whether ceasefire violations, beheadings, or dramatic terror strikes. The history of India-Pakistan negotiations tells us that it is counter-productive to expect violence to end before talks can begin. Unrealistic pre-conditions set up well-intentioned governments to fail, and fail yet again. Instead, Modi could take a leaf out of Colombia’s playbook and commit to a long-term dialogue process, recognising that violence can end as an outcome of negotiations but not if it becomes the primary obstacle to talks.

Dialogue-naysayers in India and Pakistan both argue that talking to one’s enemy endangers national security and border safety. A talking-while-fighting approach can accommodate these concerns since it does not ask India or Pakistan to stop defending their borders or responding to security threats. It suggests that leaders should empower political negotiators to keep doing their job, even while the security forces do theirs. This is smart strategy, not naiveté.

Pakistani rangers (wearing black uniforms) and Indian Border Security Force (BSF) officers lower their national flags during a daily parade at the Pakistan-India joint check-post at Wagah border, near Lahore November 3, 2014. Credit: Reuters/Mohsin Raza/Files

Pakistani rangers (wearing black uniforms) and Indian Border Security Force (BSF) officers lower their national flags during a daily parade at the Pakistan-India joint check-post at Wagah border, near Lahore November 3, 2014. Credit: Reuters/Mohsin Raza/Files

Spending political capital

But this strategy would admittedly pose a deeper political dilemma for Modi. Like Santos, Modi prides himself on being a strong leader capable of aggressive posturing against external threats. Garnering support for a long-term peace process, however, can often cost leaders popularity with their own constituencies – an infinitely tougher threat for them to stomach. When Santos began secret talks with the FARC in 2010, for example, he had been elected as one of the Colombia’s most popular presidents, riding on the military blows he dealt the FARC as defence minister. By February of this year, a peace agreement was in hand but his own approval ratings had plummeted to 24%. Peace was a bigger gamble for Santos than war could ever have been.

The question is whether Modi will be willing to spend precious political capital on continuing talks with Pakistan even when doing so makes him unpopular? What will he do when faced with a tragic terror attack performed under the glare of national and international media? When his ministers would like to out-do each other in establishing their patriotic credentials? When the TV anchors are crying war from news studios? And when the opposition is baying for his blood?

If Modi were determined to make progress on resolving Kashmir, his biggest challenge would not be Pakistan. The harder task would be to carry his own people along as he makes the compromises necessary to resolve conflict. He is arguably in a better position to do this right now than any other Indian leader in the 21st century. His dominance within his own party is practically unchallenged. The political opposition remains tepid at best and poses a minimal threat to his re-election prospects. Preparing the ground for long-term negotiations with Pakistan now will ensure that he can reap the fruits of the process during his next term. A peace agreement on Kashmir is, after all, a unique legacy that would secure his place in history.

It is true that Kashmir is not Colombia and Modi will need to work with his own political calculus. The territorial tug-of-war among nuclear rivals – India, Pakistan and China – tied to an internal armed conflict within Kashmir complicates matters. The pre-conditions for success in Colombia – from credible negotiation counterparts to a genuine interest in ending the conflict – may still have to be created in India and Pakistan. Nevertheless, Colombia is a reminder that making history will take fresh thinking, political risk, a marathon mentality, and a leader strong enough to resist the temptation to give up before crossing the finish line.

Ameya Kilara is a leadership fellow at the Center for Public Leadership, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Her research with the Program on Negotiation has focused on the role of leadership in peace processes. She has worked in law and international conflict resolution, most recently with the South Asia Programme at Conciliation Resources, London.