Book Review: The Cost of Cultural Obsession With ‘Purity and Perfection’

Naheed Phiroze Patel’s ‘A Mirror Made of Rain’ tells a multigenerational and multilayered story about growing up, loss, escapism and migration.

Noomi heaves a long-awaited sigh of relief, and she states, “Veer was a mirror that made me seem beautiful.” This poetic instance is one of many in Naheed Patel’s debut novel, A Mirror Made of Rain, which traces the coming-of-age of Noomi Wadia from her childhood in the small village of Kamalpur to her migration to Mumbai and later to New York City. In bustling, cosmopolitan Mumbai, Noomi’s soul harmoniously mirrors Veer’s, comforted by her new partner’s unflinching demeanour as she tells him of her mother’s battle with alcoholism.

Momentarily, Veer interrupts the protagonist’s relentless struggle to manage her family’s image and field the scathing comments hurled at them by community members in Kamalpur in response to Asha’s addiction. However, do not let romance lead you astray, for Noomi’s encounter with Veer outside an ATM in Mumbai – followed by their burgeoning romance and tumble into married life – is not the only story told in A Mirror Made of Rain. On the contrary, it occupies just a few of the novel’s many pages.

Naheed Phiroze Patel
A Mirror Made of Rain
Fourth Estate India (May 2021)

Though Noomi is the narrator of Patel’s novel, it would be reductive to describe A Mirror Made of Rain as a story about her independent journey to find her way out of an increasingly difficult familial context until her arrival in the US. In my view, the novel’s beauty lies precisely in the multigenerational and multilayered story that Patel weaves together, tracing Noomi’s experience backward and forward in time to illuminate the broader picture of three generations, headed by Zal Papa and his wife, Lily Mama, who attempt to maintain their business and their reputation in Kamalpur.

Our story begins long after their favourite son, Jeh, is wedded to Asha, whose alcoholism is sparked by the miscarriage and the loss of a baby boy during childbirth, only six years after Noomi’s birth. The novel opens with Asha at the centre, unable to attend the birthday of prominent socialite Sheila Seghal due to her high levels of intoxication.

Her only daughter, Noomi, and husband, Jeh, are then tasked with inventing the family’s excuse for not showing up together. “Asha’s not feeling well,” they state repeatedly, though they know it is impossible to hide the reality of Asha’s illness.

As is perhaps suggested by the title, the novel’s portrayal of the difficult entanglements within the Wadia family calls attention to the perilous and insidious effects of valuing appearance as the prime cultural and social commodity.

Through Noomi’s eyes, we glimpse the debilitating effects of the Kamalpur community’s obsessions with purity and perfection and the disproportionate responsibility that falls onto young girls and women to maintain these appearances. For instance, while Noomi is expected to fast for her husband’s well-being, maintain a small and respectable social circle, and consume respectable amounts of food and beverage, many men in her life are free to live with almost absolute impunity. Even when their behaviour violates the physical boundaries and bodily autonomy of those around them, as is the case with Sheila Sehgal’s son, it is Noomi who is explicitly blamed and implicitly carries the shame of transgression.

In this sense, A Mirror Made of Rain is bold in its critique of the double standards that exist for men and women, socially, and through this range of familial encounters – from birthday parties to engagement parties, weddings, meetings with Veer’s parents, welcome home celebrations for Asha – Patel renders an unmistakable picture of the invisible, tiresome labour performed by the women who must be seen and not heard, serve without question, and consume within reason. Remain pure at all costs, the message rings loud and clear.

I met A Mirror Made of Rain’s author, Naheed Phiroze Patel, while Taking a class at Barnard College on translation. Patel was the first member of our group of teaching assistants to take down my email, add me to the list of collaborators, and share the necessary information regarding our responsibilities for the upcoming semester. I soon learned of her formidable writing and translation abilities, showcased beautifully in the clean, crisp prose with which she resists any impulse toward prudishness, purity, or shyness as she crafts this story.

As a second-generation South Asian in the US, I found myself comforted by Patel’s references to the black kajal that my grandmother used. I was tickled by Noomi’s snarky comments about Indian vegetarians who refer to themselves as “pure vegetarians”. I felt pangs of empathy while reading all the scenes in which Noomi’s rage bubbles beneath the surface of her calm, polite demeanour. The beauty of Patel’s prose resides in how these small details are woven into the larger narrative and resonate with readers like me, removed from India, but still angered by the cultural and social focus on female purity, goodness, and politeness over other indicators of well-being.

Reading A Mirror Made of Rain made it clear to me that the cost of the cultural obsession with appearance, purity and perfection is simply too high. As Asha’s struggle inevitably becomes Noomi’s, it is impossible to separate the mother’s debilitating depression and substance-use issues from her daughter’s struggles with the structural inequality between the sexes that leads Noomi herself to hide bottles of vodka in her suitcase and escape to her room during family meetings for a bit of liquid courage.

Patel constructs substance use as intimately tied to these two women’s anger and pain, and their struggle to survive in a community that fixates on their aberrant behaviours and lacks the analysis and compassion for supporting them through unpredictable and often devastating life experiences.

Additionally, the reader gets a special glimpse of the lack of resources for dealing with the roots of these issues when Asha returns from a rehabilitation clinic, a stay mandated by Zal Papa and Jeh, and screams, “Do you know how they treat women in those places, Jeh?” Beyond the story of familial struggle, Patel’s nuanced story-telling in A Mirror Made of Rain obligates the reader to consider how these unequal, gendered relations often permeate medical institutions and prevent individuals like Asha from receiving the care they need.

This book makes an excellent case for why mental health education and advocacy is of critical importance in South Asian communities, both in India and in the diaspora – where individuals and families attempt to reconcile intersecting cultural narratives, values, and identities. But Patel does not convey this important message by painting a tragic or sensational story of trauma and substance use. Instead, she sticks with one family’s struggle and traces Noomi’s evolution, revealing the weight of intergenerational trauma placed heavily upon her shoulders that leads her to develop her own self-destructive cycles, until she makes a concerted decision to change.

If you’re looking for a happy, light ending to the Wadias’ story, A Mirror Made of Rain may not be for you. However, if you are prepared to sit with the complexities that surface in this intricately woven story about growing up, loss, escapism, and migration, this novel could provide a window into the liberating possibilities of shifting our focus away from the questions of “Log kya kahenge? (What will people think?)”, popularised recently by Hasan Minhaj in his comedy TV sketch Homecoming King and toward a more holistic vision of our mental and physical well-being, both personal and collective.

Sowmya Ramanathan is a visiting assistant professor in Hispanic Studies at the College of William & Mary.

Waiting For the ‘Robotic Shuttle’ of South Asian Representation

Characters in shows like ‘Indian Matchmaking’ and ‘Never Have I Ever’ merely adhere to the West’s idea of what a majority of South Asians are like.

My family and I have always been avid movie-goers. Friday nights were reserved for PVR popcorn, recliner seats and the latest Bollywood or Hollywood flick.

When I was 11, we went to see 2012, an apocalypse movie directed by Roland Emmerich. I remember feeling a sudden excitement when there was a short scene set in India. I couldn’t believe that a Hollywood movie could have a scene set in India, let alone a brown person in it.

I looked at Jimi Mistry’s character Satnam in awe. During his two minutes of screen time, he became my favourite character. After all, he was the first physicist to discover that the sun was releasing massive amounts of neutrinos which were heating up the Earth’s core, causing the events of the extinction-level disaster.

I still remember it clearly because I recited it to all my friends in school the next day.

As for the movie, Satnam and his family die with millions of other Indians in a tsunami when a promised assigned robotic shuttle never arrives to pick them up. And much like that robotic shuttle, 11-year-old me, who is now 21-year-old me, is still waiting for real South Asian representation.

The instant American response to this statement would be, “Yes, Apu (The Simpsons)was a mistake, but things are changing, especially, with Netflix’s Indian Matchmaking and Never Have I Ever.”

To this, I argue that not all representation is good representation. And representation specifically made for the white gaze does not truly achieve much for the community being represented.

Indian Matchmaking

Let’s talk about Indian Matchmaking, a Netflix documentary series which follows matchmaker Sima Taparia as she guides clients through the arranged marriage process. Her clientele ranges from wealthy Indian young adults to rich Indian Americans. Most Hindu, of course. God forbid, we represent a Muslim couple.

The show depicts the very large arranged marriage industry and yanks the veil off on just how casteist, racist, sexist and classist the whole business is – in India as well as within the Indian community in the US.

Many viewers have been extremely appalled at the casual use of bigoted language and accused Indian Matchmaking for glorifying the process. Others complimented the show for exposing some harsh truth of what happens in the name of marriage within the Indian community.

I don’t know if it was the royalty-free-tabla-music aspect of the soundtrack or several shots of Hindu gods and religious festivities, but within the first 20 minutes, I knew I was not the audience for the show.

White people were. Indian Matchmaking not only strengthens every stereotype South Asians have been fighting against for years, but also adds some new fun ones to the white dictionary.


Also read: ‘Indian Matchmaking’: A Regressive and Cringeworthy Ode to Arranged Marriages


At the end of the first episode, as the credits took over the screen, my hypothesis was confirmed. The show had four executive producers, namely Smriti Mundhra, Eli Holzman, Aaron Saidman and J.C. Begley.

And just as the names would probably suggest, Smriti Mundhra is the only South Asian on the list of executive producers. Holzman and Saidman are both white men, and all of them are American.

This show was essentially made by white people, for white people but about brown people. We all know how much white people love a good Bollywood dance number, henna and fun Ganesha statues.

Never Have I Ever

Moving on to Never Have I Ever, a teenage high school drama/comedy that follows the life of Devi, a first generation Indian Hindu (naturally) kid. Don’t worry though, she has an Asian friend and a gay black friend. The popular kid is half Japanese, and his adopted sister has Down’s Syndrome. None of these characters have much of a personality, but they all are great tokens for every minority group.

Devi has a cousin, Kamala, from India who lives with Devi and her mother. She is an international student in the US who is being forced into an arranged marriage. But of course, as the deprived, naive, unaware Indian that she is, she derives her strength from watching Betty from Riverdale stand up to her mother – as though she’s never seen a Bollywood or countless shows on OTT platforms ever before which included such a storyline. The show makes it seem that Kamala had no access to fun and pop culture till she got to the US.


Also read: Review: Never Have I Ever… Seen so Many Stereotypes in a Show


What I believe happened here is this: Hasan Minhaj created a show for a global audience without shying away from his South Asian background, Kal Penn made a successful career acting, not “acting Indian”, just acting. Now, suddenly all of Hollywood wanted to capitalise on how “being brown” is the new trend.

‘West’s idea of South Asia’

But instead of giving South Asian characters a stronger voice, Hollywood realised that white people enjoy watching South Asian content that adheres to their idea of what South Asians are whereas South Asians are just so desperate to be represented that even if they hate the way they are being represented, they will still watch it.

I’m guilty of this too.

The biggest problem with American and South Asian American filmmakers who make content specifically about the South Asian experiences based in South Asia is that they are not willing to show you a multidimensional narrative. When one makes a film about a culture different from America for an American audience, the audience tends to automatically assume that the thoughts/struggles/beliefs of the central character is that of the entire culture, thus creating or perpetuating stereotypes within this culture. Which is why it is so important to depict different characters from different backgrounds.

There is nothing wrong with addressing the socio-economic issues that exist within the South Asian community. However, there is a problem when that issue is highlighted as a “third world problem” for the white gaze.

Made in Heaven

An Indian TV show on Amazon Prime, Made in Heaven, addresses the issues of sexuality, classism, religious discrimination, casteism and sexism that comes with the elite wedding culture in India.

This show succeeds in everything Indian Matchmaking tries and fails to do. Understandably, both the shows are drastically different in plot, format, representation and style. But they are also drastically different because the makers of Made in Heaven are Indian women, and the makers of Indian Matchmaking are American.


Also read: ‘Made in Heaven’: The Dark Story of India’s Elite, One Wedding at a Time


Moreover, South Asian representation in American media is strictly Indian Hindu representation when in reality South Asia covers India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Afghanistan and Myanmar.

I am still waiting for the day South Asians are just represented as characters rather than caricatures in American media. But I am also waiting for the day, we, as South Asians, recognise that we are making incredible content right here at home that deserves global recognition.

And the sooner we flood over to watch those films and TV like we did for Indian Matchmaking and Never Have I Ever, the sooner we create our own representation.

Satnam in 2012 already had the research, he just needed support to build his very own robotic shuttle.

Saniya Mirwani is a filmmaker based in Mumbai and New York. She works as a Production Associate at Honto88. Saniya is also involved with producing media for the “SAHI movement” that started at Yale University to amplify marginalised voices within the South Asian community. Saniya believes that filmmaking is a medium of social change and is determined to create content that is inclusive and socially positive. She is also currently developing her short film, Any Given Night which is a dark comedy that deals with the issues of women’s safety.

#BlackLivesMatter: Let’s Not Forget India’s Closeted Racism

Considering how African nationals are ostracised in our country, Indian hypocrisy is currently at an all-time high.

George Floyd’s killing in broad daylight by a policeman in Minneapolis has enraged millions across the world. The social media circuit in India has also been taken over by news of the death of the 46-year-old African American in yet another crime borne out of hate for people of colour.

This is not the first time that India has taken up an issue that deals with racism against black people in the US. Who can forget how historical the start of #BlackLivesMatter was when it began in 2013? The movement, sparked after the killing of Trayvon Martin and the subsequent trial which acquitted his murderer using the “stand your ground” clause, took the world by storm. India too came under its effect. However, at that time, it did not fuel the sentiments of Indian celebrities and the public as much as it has in 2020 – the inclusion of social media in our lives has grown by leaps and bounds since 2013.

Floyd’s demise has awakened Indians again to the ordeals faced by black people across the globe. But as much as we love rallying behind causes of black people in the West, keep mum about such instances when they happen in our own nation.

Then, there are no reactions, no trending hashtags and no calls for justice.

Back in 2017, five Nigerian nationals, who were students in Noida, were beaten up with rods, sticks, while also being attacked with racial slurs like ‘cannibals’ and ‘drug addicts’ in a shopping mall. The then foreign affairs minister Sushma Swaraj had called for an inquiry into the incident and that was that.


Also read: Breathing While Black: The Virus of Racism


An even more brutal episode occurred in 2016 when a Congolese student and French teacher in New Delhi was killed during an altercation.

Both cases failed to raise the glaring issue of closeted racism at a national level.

After Hasan Minhaj’s recent Patriot Act episode, where the comedian tore into South Asia’s racist tendencies, former West Indies captain Darren Sammy recently expressed anger on an Instagram story after finding out the meaning of the word “kalu” – a word he said was used a fair bit during his time with SunRisers Hyderabad in the Indian Premier League (IPL).

“I will be messaging those people, you guys know who you are, I must admit at that time when I was being called as that word I thought the word meant strong stallion or whatever it is, I did not know what it meant, every time I was called with that word, there was laughter at that moment, I thought teammates are laughing so it must be something funny,” Sammy said.

Sammy’s story is further solidified by a 2014 Instagram post by cricketer Ishant Sharma where he calls him “kalu“.

Minhaj had said, “Look, I can’t say what it’s like to be black but I know how we (Asians) talk about black people. If someone in your family is dark-skinned, we clown them. We call them ‘kallu’. Bollywood stars do skin whitening commercials so we don’t look black!”


Also read: The Complicity of Silent Observers


Another example would be that of Bollywood actress Esha Gupta, who had come under heavy criticism in 2019 after a private chat of hers with a friend was leaked where she was seen mocking football star Alex Iwobi, where she called him a ‘gorilla’. She later apologised, but the damage had been done.

In a country obsessed with light complexion, it should come as no surprise the treatment of black people in India is what it is. This reminds me of the quote by Malcolm X in his autobiography, describing his struggle with his identity in his younger days: “I was trying so hard, in every way I could, to be white.”

In spite of being a land of brown skin individuals itself, what makes Indians stare down at the African community in India? Was this seed of racial prejudice sown by ‘white’ colonial empires? Or was it there all along?

African representation in the Indian entertainment industry has not helped either. While their ‘white’ counterparts are always shown as being dim witted and innocently lost in the streets of Benaras or Delhi, African characters are rarely to be seen. If there are any, they are depicted always as dealers, pimps and people with a violent or criminal nature – for example, the guy who broke locks with his bare teeth in Phir Hera Pheri.

In Fashion, the lowest point in the life of the character played by Priyanka Chopra is supposed to be her consensually sleeping with a black man – so much so that she undergoes a year of depression and psychotherapy in the film.


Also read: What Priyanka Chopra’s Performative Woke-Ness Tell Us About Indian Celebrity Culture


In 2017, ex-Delhi law minister Somnath Bharti also decided to display racist ways after he led a midnight raid on “Nigerians or Ugandans” with a mob in Khirki in Delhi’s Malviya Nagar area for allegedly being members of a “prostitution-and-drug-ring”. Several Ugandan women pressed charges of assault and criminal intimidation against those involved in the raid, and the judge in the matter said that there were no grounds or reliable evidence to conduct the raid.

With the world becoming a smaller place day by day, there is a desperate need to sensitise our hearts with mutual respect for people of every race, colour and culture. It’s a hard ask, probably an impossible ask, but our attitude towards the black community as a whole, and not just when Barack Obama or Beyonce tweet about it, needs to change.

One cannot hold a banner for crimes against a community in one part of the world, and keep silent when it happens right here. We cannot wait for an African national to suffer a similar fate in India to wake up and start having the right conversations.

Those who raise the cause of Floyd in India right now have the onus on them to disseminate the message of India’s closeted racism to African nationals residing here. So even as we continue to have conversation about police brutality, abroad and at home, it’s clear that the perspective of Indians in general towards Africans needs a lot of introspection.

Marina Abey Thomas is a freelance writer. Currently based in Delhi, she writes mostly about politics, social issues and human interest stories.

Featured image credit: Rui Silvestre/Unsplash

The Toll Playing the Identity Game Takes on You

What gives our government the right to question our existence?

“Hi! I’m Mr. Callan.”

“Hello, I’m Amrita.”

“Rita – nice to meet you.”

“No, it’s Amrita.”

“Rithap – what a lovely name.”

“No, Amrita.”

“Mrithap.”

Sensing a frustration in his voice, I spelt it out: “A-M-R-I-T-A. Amrita”

“Oh! AM-REETA. That’s such a beautiful name. It is wonderful to meet you.”

The verb ‘am’ and the anglicised pronunciation of ‘Rita’. I was 12 when I had this conversation with a middle-aged Caucasian Canadian man. My family had recently moved countries and I had been enrolled in an international school. Mr. Callan was the school principal. He proceeded to give me a tour of the school and introduced me to all the teachers as ‘AM-REETA’.

My identity had been altered and I felt too small to try again and correct everybody.

I had French first period. Madame Blaise made us all pick out a French name for the class. I chose Stéphanie.

“Oh,” Madame Blaise exclaimed. “Your actual name should be Stéphanie. It would be so much easier.”

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet”.

My existence was inconvenient. I was causing pain. I started keeping quiet, speaking only when spoken to. I tried to be invisible, hoping to minimise the discomfort of my peers and teachers. Over time, like the two other desi kids in the school, I too co-opted the anglicisation to fit in. I introduced myself as AM-REETA. I even coined a nifty little joke around my name to break the ice and place others at comfort.

§

The experience of understanding one’s identity is intensely personal, a learning process and a constant negotiation. It is shaped by our understanding of ourselves, our surroundings and the people around us. I had to learn to code-switch to fit in and later had to renegotiate what and how much I was comfortable switching. I retreated into a shell at times, unsure of my place in some conversations, only to emerge louder and stronger in others. Some of these hurt, and in other conversations, I likely hurt others. I discovered other identities and learnt to accept and celebrate their existence.

Today, our government wants to enter this extremely personal conversation. Today, we all must publicly line up to be certified. To be certified ‘Indian’ enough. To be certified ‘transgender’ enough.

Twelve years ago, when I didn’t know how to introduce myself or where I called home, when I was confused in a foreign land, I unflinchingly knew that I was Indian. Being Indian is the centre of my compass, rooting me as I travel as far as the heart desires, creating my place in the world. It is the core of my existence.


Also read: How I Broke Away From the Indian Standard of Expectations in the Middle East


But that isn’t enough. My sense of self isn’t enough for the government. It wants documentary proof of who I believe myself to be. I have enough privilege attached to my name to be able to pass the triple CAA-NRC-NPR minefield. And yet, I have never felt this humiliated.

When a non-desi person gets my name wrong, I am exasperated, not humiliated – most of them aren’t operating from a place of malice, they just don’t know any better – which still isn’t okay but that’s a different conversation.

Our government is functioning with a profound intent to hurt and damage. To inflict eternal pain on generations forever.

My personal journey of making sense of my identity in the global context seems trivial in comparison. And yet it took about six years and a change of setting for me to slowly regain confidence in my narrative and my identity. I eventually dropped the anglicisation, and one day hopefully the remnant feelings of inadequacy will drift away and I will be brave enough like Hasan Minhaj to keep correcting the person in front of me to pronounce my name exactly the way the I do.

I can’t begin to fathom the further onslaught of humiliation others less privileged will have to continue to brave – where every act of resistance is anti-national, where every breath can be the last. And yet, there is no other way to exist.  We may never be able recognise the insidious demons birthed by this government’s policies. We will neither be able to quantify the desecration of our psyche nor understand how long it will take us to recover.

What gives our government the audacity to ask 1.3 billion people to prove their identities? What gives our government the right to question our existence?

Amrita Roy grew up (feeling like she never quite fit in) across a bunch of different places in India and abroad, and is a media/entertainment professional aspiring to improve representation both in front and behind the camera.

Featured image credit: Pariplab Chakraborty

Comedian Hasan Minhaj to Feature at White House Correspondents’ Dinner

President Trump, who has skipped the dinner for the past three years, is unlikely to attend this time as well.

Washington: Popular Indian-American stand-up comedian Hasan Minhaj, who has been critical of both US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, would perform at the annual dinner of the White House Correspondents Association.

Minhaj, whose parents come from Aligarh in Uttar Pradesh, will serve as the entertainer at the event.

Kenan Thompson, the actor and longest-tenured Saturday Night Live cast-member, will serve as the host for the annual White House Correspondents Association’s (WHCA) dinner on April 25.

“Hasan Minhaj, the Peabody award-winning host of Netflix’s Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj, will return to the dinner as featured entertainer,” the WHCA announced.

“Kenan and Hasan are two of the most engaged and engaging entertainers in America. I’m thrilled they’ll help us celebrate the role of a free press in our democracy,” said Jonathan Karl, chief White House correspondent for ABC News and president of the WHCA.

“We’re looking forward to a lively evening honouring the most important political journalism of the past year,” he said.

President Trump, who has skipped the WHCA dinner for the past three years, is unlikely to attend this time as well.

Minhaj has hosted his Netflix show Patriot Act since 2018, drawing praise from critics, including a Peabody award in 2019, for his humorous and informed examination of issues of domestic and global import.

Also Read: Hasan Minhaj Stopped From Attending ‘Howdy, Modi’ Because of Remarks About PM

He was the entertainer at the 2017 WHCA dinner when he was a senior correspondent on The Daily Show. His one-hour Netflix comedy special Hasan Minhaj: Homecoming King was released in 2017, for which he won his first Peabody Award in 2018.

Thompson began his career as a member of Nickelodeon’s sketch series All That. Thompson is currently in his 17th season on SNL where he has set a record for the most celebrity impressions performed on the show.

In 2018, he received an Emmy Award for Outstanding Original Music and Lyrics and a nomination for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series.

WHCA will be presenting two new awards at the 2020 dinner: The Katharine Graham Award for Courage and Accountability and the Award for Excellence in Presidential News Coverage by Visual Journalists.

These are in addition to the longstanding Aldo Beckman Award for Overall Excellence in White House Coverage and Merriman Smith Award for Excellence in Presidential News Coverage Under Deadline Pressure.

This year’s dinner will also include the inaugural presentation of the Collier Prize for State Government Accountability, administered by the University of Florida’s College of Journalism and Communications to recognize outstanding statehouse reporting.

Facebook’s Moderators Are Sick of Being Treated Like Bots

Workers say they are burning out as they moderate vast flows of violent content under pressure.

Reports of Facebook moderators’ appalling working conditions have been making headlines worldwide.

Workers say they are burning out as they moderate vast flows of violent content under pressure, with vague, ever-changing guidelines. They describe unclean, dangerous contractor workplaces. Moderators battle depression, addiction, and even post-traumatic stress disorder from the endless parade of horrors they consume.

Yet in leaked audio recently published by The Verge, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg can reportedly be heard telling his staff that some of these reports “are, I think, a little over-dramatic”.

Out of touch and dismissive

While Zuckerberg acknowledges that Facebook moderators need to be treated humanely, overall he comes across in the recording as a person who sees human suffering as “a math problem”, as The Verge’s editor-in-chief Nilay Patel suggested on Twitter.

Zuckerberg’s response is troubling on several fronts, not least in minimising the impact of moderation on those who do it. It also works to discredit those who blow the whistle on poor working conditions.

In dismissing the real risks of poorly paid, relentless content moderation and implying that moderators who call out issues are “over-dramatic”, Zuckerberg risks compounding moderators’ trauma.

Also Read: Need Three More Months to Finalise Rules on Social Media Misuse: Centre to SC

This is a result of what American psychologists Carly Smith and Jennifer Freyd call “institutional betrayal”, where the organisation we trust to support us, doesn’t. Worse still, this behaviour has also been shown to make people doubt their decision to report in the first place.

We also contacted Facebook about Zuckerberg’s comments and asked them to confirm or deny the working conditions of their moderators. They gave us the following statement:

“We are committed to providing support for our content reviewers as we recognize that reviewing certain types of content can be hard. That is why everyone who reviews content for Facebook goes through an in-depth, multi-week training program on our Community Standards and has access to extensive support to ensure their well-being, which can include on-site support with trained practitioners, an on-call service, and healthcare benefits from the first day of employment. We are also employing technical solutions to limit exposure to graphic material as much as possible. This is an important issue, and we are committed to getting this right.”

While Zuckerberg and Facebook acknowledge that moderators need access to psychological care, there are major structural issues that prevent many of them from getting it.

Stickers bearing the Facebook logo are pictured at Facebook Inc’s F8 developers conference in San Jose, California. Photo: Reuters/Stephen Lam

Bottom of the heap

If the internet has a class system, moderators sit at the bottom – they are modern day sin-eaters who absorb offensive and traumatic material so others don’t have to see it.

Most are subcontractors working on short-term or casual agreements with little chance of permanent employment and minimal agency or autonomy. As a result, they’re largely exiled from the shiny campuses of today’s big tech companies, even though many hold degrees from top-tier universities, as Sarah T. Roberts discusses in her book Behind The Screen.

As members of the precariat, they are reluctant to take time off work to seek care, or indicate they are unable to cope, in case they lose shifts or have contracts terminated. Cost of care is also a significant inhibitor. As Sarah Roberts writes, contract workers are often not covered by employee health insurance plans or able to afford their own private cover.

This structural powerlessness has negative implications for workers’ mental health, even before they start moderating violent content.

Most platform moderators are hired through outsourcing firms that are woefully unqualified to understand the nuances of the job. One such company, Cognizant, reportedly allows moderators nine minutes each day of “wellness time” to “process” abhorrent content, with repercussions if the time is used instead for bathroom breaks or prayer.

Documentaries like The Moderators and The Cleaners reveal techno-colonialism in moderation centres in India, Bangladesh and the Philippines. As a whole, moderators are vulnerable humans in a deadly loop – Morlocks subject to the whims of Silicon Valley Eloi.

Organising for change

Despite moderators’ dismal conditions and the dismissiveness of Zuckerberg and others at the top of the tech hierarchy, there are signs that things are beginning to change.

In Australia, online community managers – professionals who are hired to help organisations build communities or audiences across a range of platforms, including Facebook, and who set rules for governance and moderation – have recently teamed up with a union, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, to negotiate labour protections.

Also Read: How Much Facebook Has to Pay in Fines and Settlements This Year

This has been done through the Australian Community Managers network (ACM), which also provides access to training and peer support. ACM is also working with like-minded organisations around the world, including Bundesverband Community Management in Germany, Voorzitter Vereniging Community Management in the Netherlands, The Community Roundtable in the United States, and nascent groups in India and Vietnam.

These groups are professional communities of practice and union-like surrogates who advocate for their people, and champion their insights and perspectives.

As this movement grows, it may challenge the tech industry’s reliance on cheap, unprotected labour – which extends beyond moderation to countless other areas, including contract game development and video production.

The YouTubers’ union and beyond

Workers in the gaming industry are also starting to push back against frameworks that exploit their time, talent and, invariably, well-being (as illuminated by Hasan Minaj on Patriot Act). In Australia Gaming Workers Unite is mobilising games workers around issues of precarious employment, harassment (online and off), exploitation and more.

And in Europe YouTubers are joining the country’s largest metalworkers’ union, IG Metall, to pressure YouTube for greater transparency around moderation and monetisation.

Although Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t seem to understand the human challenges of internetworked creativity, or the labour that enables his machine to work, he may yet have to learn. His remarks compound the material violence experienced by moderators, dismiss the complexity of their work and – most crucially – dismiss their potential to organise.

Platform chief executives can expect a backlash from digital workers around the world. The physical and psychological effects of moderation are indeed dramatic; the changes they’re provoking in industrial relations are even more so.The Conversation

Jennifer Beckett, lecturer in media and communications, University of Melbourne; Fiona R. Martin, senior lecturer in convergent and online media, University of Sydney and Venessa Paech, PhD candidate, researching AI and online communities, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Hasan Minhaj Stopped From Attending ‘Howdy, Modi’ Because of Remarks About PM

By not letting him in, Minhaj said, the organisers were in fact “honouring” his comedy.

New Delhi: Indian-American comedian Hasan Minhaj has alleged that he wasn’t allowed to enter the ‘Howdy, Modi!’ event held in Houston, which was addressed by both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump, because the organisers disapproved of comments he had made on his Netflix show, The Patriot Act.

On The Late Night Show With Seth Meyers, Minhaj talked about what happened. “I was like I have to be there. So we submit our press credentials immediately get an email back through saying ‘We’re out of space’. I was like ‘word’. Like I’ve been to Indian weddings, you just walk in. You’re out of space in a football stadium? Nah,” he said.

“So I recheck with the organisers, ‘Hey guys it’s my community, you get it?’ I want to be there. And they’re like ‘We’re out of space but we’ll discuss it’. I’m like, ‘Okay’. And I’m like I’m sorry for making fun of cricket. It’s not a sport for fops, it’s an international game that’s taking over the world. They are like, ‘No, some of the comments you made about Prime Minister Modi were not appreciated and you’ve been blacklisted’.”

Even before Minhaj went on Meyers’ show to talk about it, a video went viral on social media in which the comedian is seen speaking to the organisers on the telephone, and them saying there is not enough space.

By not letting him in, Minhaj said, the organisers were in fact “honouring” his comedy. Minhaj also told Meyers that though he was not allowed to enter the venue of the rally, his photo was flashed on the jumbotron (a large television screen) in a montage honouring prominent Indian-Americans.

Also read: Why We, as Hindu Americans, Are Opposed to Modi’s Undeclared Emergency

Ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, an episode of The Patriot Act featured Minhaj talking in detail about Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party. He was openly critical of the prime minister, and also poked fun at opposition leaders. As The Wire‘s Sidharth Bhatia wrote then:

“…Minhaj’s politics is hard to miss. And so is his intent. He understands that the desi community in the US, even if not all inclined favourably towards Narendra Modi and the Hindutva groups in general, is not fully informed about the Indian scene. They may keep abreast of the latest news, but their perceptions could be shaped by what they get through not just the mass media (American and Indian), but also social media and the avalanche of posts on family and friends WhatsApp groups.

Minhaj’s attempt is to connect the dots and make sense of all the disparate events that add up to a bigger picture – a fundamental shift in what India has been so far. “Will India remain India or not? Will India defines itself by inclusion or exclusion?” he asks. That disturbs him and he wants it to disturb others who may be otherwise ‘apolitical’ or neutral towards one party or the other.”

#RightSideUp: Modi 2.0 Report Card, Netflix in the Red

A weekly round-up of voices from the right.

New Delhi: The Narendra Modi-led BJP government at the Centre may have hit the 100-day mark, but it seems there wasn’t much to celebrate for many right-leaning websites – though most had more than just applauded the reading down of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir in August. Since then, most of the websites have been reticent to publish stories about Kashmir except the usual government-driven reports. Even the National Register of Citizens (NRC) ended on a bitter note for many on the right, leaving not much room for carousing.

It seems that’s why the usual flood of articles that mark the completion of the first hallowed hundred days, where a government is in power fresh off the back of heaps of promises made to the electorate, were conspicuously absent – perhaps because there hasn’t been much to rave about, with Kashmir still on lockdown, the Indian economy in a slump and sedition laws being the flavour of the season.

Also read: The Farther Away From Chandrayaan, the Pettier the Winds Blow

It’s not particularly far-reaching for one to say that if the Chandrayaan 2 mission hadn’t witnessed the partial failure that it did over the weekend, a large part of the credit for India’s momentous step in space exploration would have been laid at Prime Minister Modi’s feet in article after article and by numerous TV anchors.

That’s not to say that the Indian Space Research Organisation and its chief K. Sivan would not have been at the receiving end of accolades.

Television screens and social media also regurgitated visuals of the prime minister pulling in an emotional Sivan for a benevolent hug. Debates raged online about on whether he should have broken down or kept the decorum, but the chorus emerged that ‘Indians are an emotional lot’, armed with the usual trolling abuse.

But Modi, despite having walked away initially, as seen on camera, when told about the possible failure of the soft-landing of the lander Vikram, managed to successfully turn it into a PR movement. As one Twitter user put it:

On right-leaning sites like Swarajya and OpIndia, headlines fawned over Modi’s speech while rightfully applauding ISRO for its commendable work on the Chandrayaan 2 mission. Some sites also lashed out at NDTV’s science and technology journalist Pallava Bagla, who was roasted on social media.

In an article on The Frustrated Indian Post, formerly rightlog.in, Yash Joshi, an aspiring civil servant who is “hell bent on bringing about a positive change in India” calls him a “sorry excuse of a human being” in the strap itself. The article, which has over 43,000 views – as seen from the view counter displayed on the page – says:

“As the nation rallied around to support ISRO for their tremendous efforts and determination, Pallava Bagla decided to scream at an ISRO scientist because his entitled self didn’t want to ask questions to anyone below Dr K Sivan, the Chief of ISRO.

Bagla who claims to be a ‘journalist’ at NDTV showcased his arrogance which seems to be in the DNA of NDTV at an unfortunate hour by deciding to shout at Mr D.P. Karnik, an ISRO scientist during the media interaction. Bagla’s entitled self couldn’t withstand the presence of someone below Dr Sivan and further went to humiliate him by calling him a ‘junior scientist’.

My heart goes out to Mr Karnik who was visibly intimidated by the screams of a deplorable human being like Bagla.”

Joshi, who it seems never bothered to actually read up on Bagla’s work and contributions to reporting in the field of science, branded the journalist’s apology “half-hearted”. He then breaks into a rant about NDTV and says Bagla’s “behaviour was completely in tune with the journalistic standards of NDTV. NDTV is infamous for furthering their anti-India and towing Pakistan’s line which was quite evident from their coverage on Article 370”.

Also read: #RightSideUp: The Great NRC Conspiracy Theory

Modi 2.0 scorecard

Among the very few who chose to review the first hundred days of the present regime was R. Jagannathan, the editorial director of Swarajya magazine, in Mint‘s opinion section, in an article titled ‘Modi 2.0 scores impressively on politics if not on economics‘.

He starts by hailing the number of Bills that were passed during the “most productive parliament session in [a] decade” – that many have also called India’s ‘most dangerous parliament session’.

“If one goes by the numbers, the performance of Modi 2.0 in its first 100 days is staggering… it saw 38 bills being introduced, 28 of them passed with an overwhelming majority.

On the political side, Article 370 has been reduced to a cipher and Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) bifurcated into two Union territories, the anti-terror law has been amended to let the state declare individuals as terrorists, the National Investigation Agency has been empowered to probe more kinds of crime like human trafficking, currency fraud and cyber terrorism. If this is not extraordinary for any government in its post-poll honeymoon period, what is?”

He acknowledges that amid all this stupendous law-making, the economy is where the government has been underperforming the most. But before he even begins to make his argument, he lays out a point as to how it has been the norm for NDA governments to make big moves in the initial hundred days that are “political in nature”.

“While the economic slowdown has pushed the finance minister to announce weekly policy relaxations to boost business sentiment, these can hardly be read as proactive moves. They are reactive. This is the reality of Modi 2.0. He barely gets pass marks on economic priorities, but 9/10 in political messaging.”

Also read: #RightSideUp: A Tale of Two Former Finance Ministers

Netflix in the red

Less than a week ago, Netflix became fodder for social media for a day after a member of the Shiv Sena’s IT cell lodged a police complaint against the streaming service for “defaming the country” and portraying “an incorrect picture”.

The shows caught in the crossfire include Sacred Games, Leila, Ghoul and the comedy talk show Patriot Act hosted by Hasan Minhaj.

The news desk at The Frustrated Indian Post reacted ecstatically to the news in ‘Finally! Complaint filed against Netflix for its anti-Hindu propaganda’.

The article states how Netflix has been “indulging in anti-Hindu propaganda for a long time”.

“Series such as Leila, depict a Hindu oppressive state, which portrays that in the name of religion, the individuals aren’t given their basic rights. However, such an oppressive Hindu state is a piece of fiction at best, unrelated to the current scenario and unlikely to happen in the near future.

Moreover, the second season of Sacred Games shows Hinduphobia and Indophobia of another level altogether. Here, a Sanatani teacher is not only venomous, but is also ready to blow up an entire city in order to achieve his goals… In this series, almost every Hindu character is shown as wicked, uncouth and barbaric, while Muslim characters, especially Inspector Majid [Shahid being the sole exception] have been shown as innocent, resolute, not hesitating to sacrifice themselves if need be.

People are now becoming more informed and vocal against the leftist propaganda in the movies, and what is being witnessed is a surge of nationalists objecting to false portrayal of Hinduism and against those who link Hinduism to intolerance. India, being a secular country does not show any religion in a bad light, and certain pieces of cinematic art such as the Netflix TV shows.”

Also read: #RightSideUp: A Kashmir State of Mind; An ‘MRI Report’ for the Ages

‘Netflix Shows Defaming Hindus and India’: Shiv Sena Member

Shiv Sena’s IT cell member has urged the police to take action against the online streaming platform for hosting hinduphobic content.

A member of the Shiv Sena, Ramesh Solanki has filed a complaint against  Netflix – a US-based online streaming platform – alleging that its content portrays India and Hindus in a bad light globally.

Solanki is Shiv Sena’s Information Technology cell member and has cited examples of Netflix series like Sacred Games, Leila and Ghoul, along with the episodes of standup comedian Hasan Minhaj to show how the streaming platform is “defaming Hindus and India.”

“Almost every series on Netflix India is with the intention to defame the country on a global level. It is with deep-rooted Hinduphobia that the platform is portraying the nation in a bad light,” Solanki told ANI

While speaking to DNA, Ramesh Solanki added, “They are putting out content that’s portraying our nation in a bad light and it’s being done in the name of freedom of expression.”

He further said that he will submit a copy of his complaint along with the CD as a piece of evidence to chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, commission of police and the cyber cell.

In the complaint, he mentioned that in Sacred Games, “Aham Brahmasami, a Vedic chant, and a sacred hymn have been framed as a war cry. People belonging to a cult greet each other with this hymn, suggesting that the hymn radicalises people to indulge in a war against humanity.”

Speaking to DNA, he also accused Netflix of demeaning “guru-shishya parampara with overtly sexual gestures” and targeting one of Rashtriya Swayamsevak’s leaders.

“One of our country’s social reformer is fondly called Guruji and this series seems to attack the revered person. To show the ruling dispensation is influenced by Guruji is to show that the Government of India is influenced by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and RSS’ Guruji will go for a nuclear war. That the RSS vide Guruji will use Muslims to spread terror. In order to avoid controversy, the producer suggested that the character is based on Rajneesh. Not the plot of the series but its agenda is a sinister plot,” he said.


Also read ‘Leila’ Review: Netflix’s New Original Series is Not ‘Anti-Hindu’


He also condemned the series Leila which, according to him, indicates that Aryavrat will be established in India.

“Aryavrat will be a land of bigots, casteists, Muslim-hating, women-hating patriarchal sect. The term ‘Aryavrat’ is an undertone to suggest that the Hindu Rashtra is/will be of this kind. The SC’s earlier verdict that was recently upheld said that Hindu is a way of life. And to suggest that the way of life will be like a radical cult is demeaning and hurts our religious sentiments,” he said.

Standup comedian Hasan Minhaj, according to him, is spreading false propaganda on the reading down of Article 370 by the central government.
In a similar picture, the Economic Times reported that Delhi BJP spokesperson Tajinderpal Singh Bagga filed a complaint against Sacred Games director Anurag Kashyap accusing him of “disrespecting Sikhs and Hindu sentiments.”
Akali Dal Leader Majinder Singh Sirsa followed suit saying that the actor Saif Ali Khan is seen throwing away his Kada, a symbol of the Sikh community, into the sea.

According to NDTV, Solanki has urged the police to “take necessary legal action” against Netflix.


Also Read  ‘Sacred Games’ Goes Where Our Silent News Media Doesn’t


“I urge the authorities to look into all of the above-mentioned content and take the necessary steps from summoning their team to cancelling their licenses as deemed fit. One cannot allow an incorrect generalisation based on bogus rhetoric trying to defame a religious minority, that is, Hindu in countries other than India,” he added.

Featured image credit: Unsplash

Lilly Singh is Just in Time, Not ‘A Little Late’

While I am not a big fan of her content, I’ll still root for her upcoming late night talk shows because of the general lack of diversity on NBC.

Everytime, arguably the most influential man in the world, tells four Democratic congresswomen of colour to “go back to where they came from,” we stray further away from god.

But among deafening “send her back” chants, there is a ray of hope, one that is in accordance with some of the hopes of an inclusive society that were pinned onto the 21st century.

Canadian YouTuber Lilly Singh, a.k.a Superwoman, is helping us inch closer towards what resembles a diverse society. Making her way through American late night network television, she is the only woman of colour and queer person in a group of mostly straight white men.

As representation of coloured folks is on the rise in Hollywood, it still is not as common to see South Asian names as it is to see Hispanic, black or even Eastern Asian names.

While movies like Crazy Rich Asians and Black Panther, or shows like Jane the Virgin or One Day at a Time have helped people of colour tell their stories without the involvement of a white-saviour protagonist, Indians have to be content with a handful South Asian artists, such as Mindy Kaling, Kumail Nanjiani, Jameela Jamil, Hasan Minhaj and Priyanka Chopra, to name a few. Seeing Singh – a bisexual Sikh brown woman – act as a catalyst aiding diversity is a step towards the better.


Also read: An Open Letter to Everyone Who Thinks I Have to ‘Look’ Sikh to Be Sikh


Though many people around me followed Singh religiously, watching her videos every week and discussing those for hours at length, I personally was not quite fond of her.

Her impressions of her on-screen parents, Manjit and Paramjeet, put me off. To me, they seemed too exaggerated to be funny and reinforced stereotypes that the desi diaspora has to fight regularly.

It was unsettling for me to see Singh conveniently borrow from black culture: donning cornrows in her videos and becoming desi again for magazine photoshoots. I found her content to be repetitive – a video form of BuzzFeed quizzes that tell you what kind of a person you are, what zodiac sign you are, what colour you are, and many such.

So if I am not a fan of the content she has created over a span of nine years, why does her bagging a late night talk show with NBC interest me?

I credit it to diversity/possible tokenism.

I was introduced to late night television through Saturday Night Live (SNL), and while I have enjoyed quite a lot of their sketches, I cannot help but notice the stark lack of representation of coloured folks within the show – be it their cast (which is apparently crawling towards diversity with its three black and ten white repertory players), or be it their hosts.

As of season 42 (2016), a whopping 90.68% of their hosts have been white.

The situation is relatively better with the political satire sub-genre of late night shows. While Samantha Bee, Trevor Noah and more recently, Hasan Minhaj have gotten their own shows, what often goes unnoticed is the diversity within writing teams – as in the case of NBC’s Late Night with Seth Meyers, a significant chunk of which comprises men and women of colour as well as queer folks.

This, coupled with the journey Singh has been on over the past nine years is admirable.


Also read: Netflix’s ‘GLOW’ is Funny, Diverse, Relevant and Deserves Much More Attention


She began creating videos in order to work through depression; by making other people laugh, she tried to make herself feel better. The moniker ‘Superwoman’ also came up with the idea “to be her own superhero, to deal with life’s obstacles. However, in a recent Instagram post, she hung up the Superwoman cape for good, and thanked ‘Lilly’ for being the real superhero.

It is a recent phenomenon to see celebrities and public figures talk about their mental health and its impact on their professional lives. With Singh joining this movement of-sorts, another chip has been made in the wall that places stigma on mental health issues as late as in 2019.

Though I look forward to seeing what is to come, as well as if and/or how A Little Late with Lilly Singh would tackle issues such as LGBTQIA+ oppression, racism and sexism, it would be imprudent to expect TV’s age-old parcel of problems being addressed and solved.

Of all the major networks the US has to offer, NBC seems to have shot way ahead into the diversity race with A Little Late.

However, only time will tell though if the show is a mere people-pleasing move, or would it actually help and break some hurdles that upcoming LGBTQIA+ folks, people of colour, and religious minorities could face as they build a future in comedy, and Hollywood.

Kavya Sharma is a 20-year-old Economics student who wishes to spend her entire life admiring and hyping up women. She is also unhealthily obsessed with Taco Bell and the Meat Ball.

Featured image credit: Twitter