Delhi Lowers Drinking Age From 25 to 21

The Aam Aadmi Party’s new excise policy also says the government will shut all its liquor stores in the capital.

New Delhi: Lowering legal drinking age to 21 from 25 years and the government withdrawing from running liquor vends in Delhi are among the main features of an excise policy approved by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) dispensation on Monday, with deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia saying the measure is expected to lead to an annual revenue growth of 20%.

The government decided to shut all its shops in the national capital as they were generating less earnings in comparison to private liquor stores. Currently, 40% of around 850 establishments in the national capital are privately run. According to the government, state-run vends were indulging in “brand pushing” and there were also instances of revenue leakage.

Addressing a press conference, Sisodia said the new measure will put an end to the liquor buying experience from a “jail-like setup” at state-run shops. Private liquor shops being allowed should have a minimum area of 500 square feet. The government announced that no new liquor shops will be opened and 60% share of government shops in the current retail liquor business will be replaced by private players.

Sisodia said it is not the government’s job to sell liquor and hoped that the excise revenue will increase by Rs 1,500-2,000 crore annually after the implementation of the new policy. Currently, the government gets around Rs 6,000 crore from the excise revenue.

Also read: Lok Sabha Passes Bill Establishing Total Power of LG, Centre Over Delhi Government

Lowering drinking age will also help the government discourage young people from going to pubs and hotels in Noida and neighbouring cities, a move that will also increase the excise revenue as such establishments in Delhi will not have to face a hefty penalty for serving alcohol to customers of the age group.

The government said that in states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Assam, Odisha and Tamil Nadu, the age of consuming alcohol is 21 years, while in Goa and Andhra Pradesh it is 18 years.

The National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI) welcomed the decision and said that it was a “pragmatic” step that would benefit both businesses and the exchequer. Noting that the current legal drinking age prescribed for Delhi was an outdated law that finds its genesis in the Punjab Excise Act of 1914, NRAI president Anurag Katriar said that the association had been requesting for amending such archaic laws.

As part of the reforms, the Delhi government will also set up an international standard check-up system by which it will keep a watch on low-quality liquors and stop their distribution. An international quality lab will be set up to test the quality of liquor coming into the city.

Also read: AAP Cries Foul After Centre Blocks Delhi Govt’s Doorstep Ration Delivery Scheme

Lauding the new excise policy, chief minister Arvind Kejriwal tweeted, “Excise reforms announced today will act as a major blow to liquor mafia in Delhi. The mafia will do everything to obstruct these reforms. AAP govt has ended mafia raj in many sectors like education, water, elect, health, etc. We are committed to reforming this sector too.”

Sisodia, who also holds the excise portfolio, said the excise policy was approved by the cabinet on the basis of the recommendations of the groups of ministers.

The deputy chief minister said that the policy intends to ensure equitable distribution of liquor vends in every part of the city as 158 out of 272 municipal wards are currently either “unserved or underserved”, adding that 45 municipal wards are such where there is no liquor shop, leading to emergence of “liquor mafia” in such areas.

He said that the current retail experience at state-run liquor shops is like a jail. “When you go to a shop, there is a grill and people rush and throw money to buy liquor. There is no dignity. Bootlegging and illicit liquor will stop in these areas,” he said.

He said that private liquor shops in Delhi will not have any counter facing towards the road, adding that liquor sale and pickup will only take place inside the shop and nothing will take place outside the shop.

Watch: Education, Health and ‘Deshbhakti’ Our Top Agenda: Delhi’s Deputy CM Manish Sisodia

“The liquor shop owners will have to ensure law and order outside the shop. If needed they can take the help of police or CCTV or security guard, but ensuring law and order will be the responsibility of liquor shop owners. No drinking outside the shop, no hawkers will be allowed,” he also said.

He said that “massive changes” in accordance with the industry feedback are being made to stop harassment of honest businesspeople running hotels and restaurants in Delhi. “There have been long demands from the hospitality sector to abolish various obsolete license [systems] related to liquor sale. Today we have decided that in a bid to ensure ease of doing business we will merge various licences. The hospitality sector is ready to pay taxes honestly, but due to the complex licensing system, their business suffers,” he said.

Criticising the government’s move, Delhi BJP spokesperson Praveen Shankar Kapoor has said that nothing can be more illogical then Sisodia’s statement that government liquor shops were involved in “brand pushing”. “The truth is that actually government liquor shops were a hurdle for private liquor mafia to sell cheap brands of other states in Delhi, and now the Kejriwal government has given them the freedom,” Kapoor said.

Delhi Government Reduces Circle Rates For Properties by 20%

The move will revive the real estate sector, create new jobs and “reduce the financial burden on the common man”, chief minister Arvind Kejriwal said.

New Delhi: People eyeing a home in posh localities of Delhi like Vasant Kunj and Golf Links will have to pay over Rs 1.5 lakh less per square metre of land as the government slashed circle rates by 20% for properties across all categories of areas in the city on Friday.

The Delhi Cabinet, which met under the chairmanship of chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, decided to reduce circle rates of properties in residential, commercial and industrial categories in the city by 20% for six months.

The properties in Delhi are categorised in eight classes from ‘A’ to ‘H’, with posh areas falling under ‘A’ while least developed areas are in ‘H’ category, officials said.

The existing circle rate of land in ‘A’ category areas – Rs 7.74 lakh per square metre – will go down to Rs 6.19 lakh per square metre, they said. In ‘H’ category, the circle rate will be reduced from Rs 23,280 to Rs 18,624 per square meter, they added.

The minimum construction cost of commercial properties will also decrease from Rs 25,200 per square metre to Rs 20,160 per square metre in ‘A’ category areas, the officials said. In ‘H’ category areas, it will go down from Rs 3,960 per square metre to Rs 3,168 per square metre, they added.

The minimum rate of built-up flats (per square metre) in more than four-storeyed buildings will be reduced from Rs 87,840 to Rs 78,272.

Kejriwal expressed hope that the step will help in giving a boost to the economy post the COVID-19 pandemic. “While we are slowly recovering from the economic contraction in the post-COVID era, it is the duty of our government to take all steps to further reduce the financial burden on the common man,” he said.

Also read: Should Delhi’s Poor Expect Its Chief Minister to Live up to His Promise?

The decision is expected to make it “substantially cheaper” for people to do property transactions, he said. It will also revive the real estate sector which has been hit severely by the coronavirus pandemic and create new jobs, he added.

Revenue minister Kailash Gahlot said the lowering of circle rates will encourage more people to transact in real estate and avoid the stagnation in the sector. A reduction of 20% in the circle rate would have an impact close to reduction by 1% in the stamp duty or registration charges, he said.

The decision to cut down circle rates till September 30, 2021, will also boost the revenue collection of the government, officials said.

Against a target of Rs 5,300 crore from property registration in 2020-21, the actual collection has been Rs 1,830 crore by November 2020, they added.

(PTI)

Will AAP’s Young Faces Secure Any Cabinet Ranks?

With four prominent youth leaders having won their seats along with all seven incumbent ministers, the party faces its first dilemma.

New Delhi: With all of its ministers and youth leaders having won elections, a problem of plenty now stares the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) as it sits down to formulate its next cabinet. The party bagged 53.57% of the votes and won 62 out of 70 seats in the Delhi assembly elections.

The problem of accommodating dynamic young leaders when senior leaders, already occupying high positions in the government, stake another strong claim is not new to Delhi. This longstanding problem arises because under Article 239AA of the Indian constitution, the number of ministers cannot exceed 10% of seats in the Delhi assembly. Hence, there can be no more than seven ministers in the Delhi government.

All seven ministers retain their seats

This time around, all the seven sitting ministers have won their seats. Chief minister Arvind Kejriwal won the New Delhi constituency for the third successive time while deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, after trailing the BJP candidate for hours, sharply recovered his lead to retain Patparganj.

Health and home minister Satyendra Jain from Shakur Basti and labour and development minister Gopal Rai from Babarpur are two other senior government functionaries who won their seats.

Also read: The Fruit of AAP’s Labour

The other three ministers to sail through were water and SC/ST minister Rajendra Pal Gautam from Seemapuri, law and transport minister Kailash Gahlot from Najafgarh, and food and civil supplies minister Imran Hussain from Ballimaran.

With Kejriwal and Sisodia occupying the top two posts, and Gopal Rai and Satyendra Jain being near certain of retaining their seats, there remain only three slots for all the other winning legislators of the party to eye.

One seat each may be kept for a Muslim, SC

There too, one ministerial berth in Delhi has traditionally been kept by parties for a Muslim. With AAP winning all five seats where Muslims constitute over 40% of the population, it remains to be seen if Imran Hussain will be replaced or not.

One serious contender for the post this time would be Okhla legislator Amanatullah Khan. This time he has scored the second-biggest victory for his party by defeating Braham Singh of the BJP by 71,827 votes. The largest victory margin was of AAP candidate Sanjeev Jha, who won by 88,158 votes from Burari.

With AAP also winning all the 10 seats reserved for Scheduled Castes in Delhi, it would be interesting to see if it would replace its SC/ST minister Gautam with one of the other candidates, if it decides to retain one slot in the cabinet for a member of the reserved category.

That effectively leaves just one open slot on the cabinet for the numerous young and bright leaders of the party who have won.

Youth leaders make a strong case for cabinet berth

One of the most articulate and popular faces among them is Atishi. The Oxford-educated leader was one of the architects of the education reforms in her capacity as an advisor to Sisodia. A member of the Political Affairs Committee of the party, she has now won from the Kalkaji constituency.

Also read: With Another Win in Delhi, Is Arvind Kejriwal Moving to the National Pulpit?

Similarly, Raghav Chadha, who won from the Rajinder Nagar constituency, is a practising chartered accountant who is also the national treasurer and spokesperson for AAP.

Saurabh Bharadwaj is another young face of the party. He was a minister in the 49-day government that was formed after the 2013 win and shot to prominence after he demonstrated, in the Delhi assembly, how electronic voting machines could be hacked. The claim was denied by the Election Commission.

Another claimant for a cabinet position this time is Dilip Pandey, the convenor of Delhi unit of AAP, who won from Timarpur by 24,144 votes. A Poorvanchali leader, his claim to a ministerial berth is likely to be strong since AAP is now nurturing national ambitions and would like to send out a strong message in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

In Delhi, Doorstep Ration Delivery Comes in the Way of Accountability Framework

The Delhi government’s affidavit in response to a contempt petition states that the “matter is currently under consideration.”

New Delhi: The starvation deaths of three minor girls in East Delhi last year highlighted the alarming situation of food insecurity and distress in the capital. Despite this, the Delhi government has not framed grievance redressal rules or put in place an accountability framework under the National Food Security Act.

A recent affidavit submitted by the state government in the Delhi high court has shown how the Arvind Kejriwal government’s eagerness to include the doorstep delivery of rations into the grievance redressal rules was one of the main reasons behind this.

The affidavit was filed by the government in a contempt petition filed by the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan in February this year. The Abhiyan had made the department of food and consumer affairs of the Delhi government, through its Assistant Commissioner, Rajesh Ahuja, the respondent.

The contempt petition had accused the Delhi government of failure to comply with the order of the Delhi high court dated September 1, 2017 requiring it to put in place the requisite grievance redressal and accountability framework under the NFSA.

Also read: Buoyed by SC Ruling, Kejriwal to Implement Doorstep Ration Delivery Scheme

HC was appalled that rules under NFSA were not framed

In its 2017 order, a bench of Chief Justice Geeta Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar stated that it was appalled to note that the Delhi government failed to promulgate rules under the NFSA even three years after the enactment of the law. It directed the government to frame rules and operationalise all provisions of the law in a time-bound manner to ensure the proper functioning of ration shops in Delhi.

The directions were issued in a case filed by the Abhiyan against Aadhaar being made mandatory for receiving rations under the National Food Security Act.

Abhiyan sought contempt action as government still did not act

The contempt plea stated that “more than 16 months have elapsed from the date of order of this Hon’ble Court, and more than five years since the statutory mandate of NFSA came into force,” and so it was constrained to initiate contempt proceedings for “continuing, persistent, wilful and continued non-compliance with the order.”

In its response, submitted this month, the Delhi government said “the matter is currently under consideration.”

How the file moved as Delhi’s hungry waited for food

The affidavit provided a date-wise account of how the file moved over the last year and a half.

August 9, 2017 – Assistant commissioner, department of FSCA forwarded relevant file to the chief secretary for approval for the constitution of the state food commission and draft notification for grievance redressal mechanism rules.

August 14, 2017 – Assistant commissioner received remarks from the office of the chief secretary to confirm the salaries and allowances proposed under Rule 15. File subsequently forwarded to minister of food supplies and then to chief minister.

August 21, 2017 – File resubmitted to chief secretary by assistant commissioner.

September 1, 2017 – Lieutenant governor approved the file.

September 5, 2017 – Chief minister directed FSCA department to constitute a committee to prepare and implement effective rules.

September 12, 2017 – Department constituted the committee

October 25, 2017 – Committee submitted its report

November 16, 2017 – Department incorporated the observations and suggestions of the committee into draft rules and forwarded them to the law department.

September 6, 2018 – After nearly a 10-month wait, law minister forwarded file to FSCA minister.

September 10, 2018 – FSCA minister said department committed to provide doorstep delivery of rations for which cabinet decision has already been taken and it would be appropriate that the Rules be framed accordingly. The FSCA minister directed that law minister/department’s observations be kept in mind while framing of rules.

October 10, 2018 – FSCA Department seeks file relating to doorstep delivery of ration.

November 12, 2018 – FSCA minister directs department to give a presentation on proposed draft grievance redressal rules.

January 9, 2019 – Department urges FSCA minister to seek law department’s view on incorporation of doorstep delivery of ration into grievance redressal rules.

March 28, 2019 – Department submits that the “matter is currently under consideration of Delhi government”.

Also read: Doorstep Delivery of 40 Government Services to Begin in Delhi

‘Affidavit exposes lackadaisical approach of government’

Anjali Bhardwaj of the Abhiyan said, “the reply filed by the Delhi government reveals the lackadaisical approach adopted by the government and admits, on record, that the appropriate machinery for grievance redress has still not been set up more than 6 years after the law was passed and 19 months since the order of the Delhi high court.”

She insisted that the “affidavit shows that the file regarding the framing of rules for grievance redress has just been transferred between various departments and ministries, with no concrete action being taken.”

Why the grievance mechanism was important for citizens

Bhardwaj said, “under the NFSA, up to 50% of the urban population is entitled to 5 kg of subsidised grains per person per month. Families under the Antodaya category are to receive 35 kg per family per month.”

Bhardwaj added that “proper implementation of the NFSA is crucial to ensure food security for the poor and marginalised” and went on further saying that the “starvation death of three minor girls” was indicative of the problems in the system.

“Having a robust grievance redress framework would ensure that people’s complaints and grievances about problems in accessing their right to food would be addressed in a time-bound manner.”

Moreover, NFSA also provides for mandatory periodic social audits and setting up of a state food commission – two more things which have been lacking in Delhi. The law also requires the appointment of district grievance redressal officers, internal grievance redressal mechanism and transparency of ration-related records.

Buoyed by SC Ruling, Kejriwal to Implement Doorstep Ration Delivery Scheme

Though the cabinet in Delhi had passed the scheme in early March, the LG had refused to give his consent. Still, many activists have voiced their concern that the scheme would ‘reduce transparency’ and ‘increase corruption’.

New Delhi: Just two days after the Supreme Court, while ruling on the turf war between the Centre and the elected government in Delhi, declared that “the power given to LG under Article 239AA(4) contains the rule of exception and should not be treated as a general norm” and that the LG “has the authority to dissent, but it cannot be exercised in a routine manner”, Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal today announced his decision to go ahead with the doorstep ration delivery scheme. However, the move has been criticised by food rights activists who claim that it would only lead to logistical problems and greater denial of rations.

Food rights activists have also accused the Kejriwal government of indulging in the optics of the move as despite a high court order and four years having passed since the implementation of the National Food Security Act in Delhi, it has still not put in place rules to operationalise the Act which requires the state government to constitute a State Food Commission, undertake periodic social audits of functioning of ration shops and make rules for grievance redressal.

Incidentally, the scheme had been approved by the Delhi cabinet on March 6 this year but had been rejected by LG Anil Baijal later the same month. This proposal had also become a bone of contention between the elected Aam Aadmi Party government and the LG. Kejriwal and three of his ministers also put up a nine-day dharna at Raj Niwas to push for getting this scheme approved while also demanding that the IAS officer’s undeclared strike in the city be brought to an end.

Kejriwal overrules all objections, directs department to implement scheme

Buoyed by the apex court’s ruling, which had specified that while the LG “has to be apprised of every decision taken by the council of ministers, but he cannot change the decision” and that “there is no provision for consent”, Kejriwal today declared that he had overruled all objections to the proposal and directed immediate implementation of the scheme.

Cabinet had approved scheme to provide rations with “maximum ease”

When the scheme had been approved by the Delhi Cabinet, in a meeting chaired by Kejriwal, it was stated the proposal for home delivery or doorstep delivery of rations under the targeted Public Distribution System (PDS) was approved for all 19.5 lakh ration cards in Delhi that covered a total of 72 lakh beneficiaries.

Approving the Department of Food, Supply and Consumer Affairs’ proposal for providing doorstep delivery of wheat or flour, rice and sugar, under the National Food Security Act 2013, the Kejriwal government had stated that the decision has been taken as it was committed to ensure that “eligible beneficiaries receive their due ration in a transparent manner with maximum ease”.

‘Ration beneficiaries were facing unforeseen trouble’

In a note, the Delhi government had said that “Aadhaar based identification of ration holders was one such reform, which has faced teething problems resulting in ration beneficiaries facing unforeseen trouble. Given this experience, doorstep delivery of ration is aimed at removing the problems faced by ration beneficiaries”.

The cabinet had also noted that the laws, rules and guidelines issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs had urged the state governments to ensure home delivery of ration to the beneficiaries experiencing difficulty in getting their entitled quantum of subsidised foodgrain due to old age, physical disability etc.

‘Open bidding for selecting service provider’

The Kejriwal government had said that the proposal was aimed at providing a higher level of transparency in delivery system through an inbuilt online monitoring system which will weed out corruption and diversion of food grains. “It will save time and resources of ration beneficiaries of Delhi.”

The Delhi government had also noted that “the service provider for home delivery of ration will be selected in a transparent manner through open bidding”.

Baijal had refused consent

The cabinet had then sent the approved proposal to Baijal for his nod. However, the Lieutenant Governor had stalled the moved and asked the Kejriwal government to refer the proposal to the Centre even as the CM insisted that no such reference was required according to law.

While not acting on the proposal, Baijal had also asked the Kejriwal government to reconsider stalling the e-PoS (Point of Sale) system at fair price shops.

“Use of e-PoS devices facilitates portability i.e. the beneficiaries can choose to lift ration from any FPS of his/ her choice. This promotes competition and empowers the beneficiaries/consumers. L-G advises that the decision to suspend the operation of e-PoS devices be reconsidered,” a statement issued by his office had stated. The elected government had then accused Baijal of “killing” the “landmark” scheme for the poor.

With the backing of the Supreme Court order, Kejriwal may now be in a position to launch the doorstep delivery of ration scheme but the move has been criticised by food rights activists.

‘Doorstep delivery scheme not practical or desirable, meant for exceptional cases only’

Well known activist Jean Dreze of the Right to Food Campaign (Jharkhand) said “in the context of the Public Distribution System (and in the National Food Security Act), the term “doorstep delivery” generally refers to bulk delivery to PDS shops, not home delivery to PDS beneficiaries. Home delivery, in general, is neither practical nor desirable.”

He called for removing biometric authentication from the system instead, saying that would ease the delivery process. “If biometric authentication is removed, as it should, the problem of old people not being able to go in person to the ration shop will be solved – they will be able to ask a neighbour or relative to go on their behalf (as they used to do before biometric authentication).”

Dreze also noted that doorstep delivery of rations should only be undertaken as an emergency measure and should not be made a general practice. “At best, doorstep delivery to a person’s home should be an emergency measure in exceptional cases (e.g. possible starvation), in areas where biometric authentication applies. It is important to avoid creating chaos in the PDS by making home delivery a general practice, as the Delhi government seems to be considering.”

‘Complete lack of transparency on doorstep delivery of ration scheme’

Meanwhile, the Delhi Rozi Roti Adhikar Abhiyan (DRRAA), which has been working for the rights of citizens to access PDS rations, has criticised the proposal of Delhi government on doorstep delivery of ration for the “complete lack of transparency”.

Food rights activists Anjali Bhardwaj, Amrita Johri, Koninka Ray, Anwar Haque, Rajender Kumar, Aditi Diwedi and Ayesha said in stated thatno details of the scheme in terms of the oversight mechanism, transparency and accountability safeguards, or the infrastructure and human resources arrangements, have been made available.

“It is not clear whether the government will undertake the home delivery or if it will be outsourced to private companies. Further, there has been no public consultation on the proposal, which is a violation of the Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy of 2014. To our knowledge, the government has not undertaken any pilot or testing of the said proposal,” the statement said.

Bharadwaj also quipped that it was strange for the Aam Aadmi Party, which was formed on the premise of promoting transparency through public discussion, to not hold any consultations with the beneficiaries on such an important issue. The activists urged the Delhi government not to implement the proposal of home delivery of ration in a hasty manner without holding any pilot or any public consultations on the issue.

They also flagged several concerns about the proposal.

“First, in the current scenario, where there is poor oversight and monitoring of 2,500 ration shops in Delhi, it is unclear how the administration will carry out oversight of large number of delivery persons, which will be many times more than the 2,500 ration shops,” they asked. Bharadwaj wondered how when the government was unable to regulate 2500 shops, it would be able to effectively monitor the nearly 25,000 delivery persons.

‘Doorstep delivery will reduce transparency, increase corruption’

The activists also cautioned that “delivery at individual homes may reduce transparency and increase corruption.” In this regard, they pointed out that distribution of grain in a public place reduces the chances of cheating.

Another area of concern, they said, pertained to media reports and statements by officials suggesting that the delivery persons will be equipped with Aadhaar-enabled Point of Sale devices which will be required during delivery. Here the activists warned that “re-introducing Aadhaar in delivery of ration will again create problems of exclusions and denial of grains to eligible persons.”

The statement by the Abhiyan also pointed out that “home delivery of rations is neither practical nor desirable”. It said “most ration beneficiaries are daily wagers and therefore they may not be available at home to take delivery of ration. Also, this proposal will take away the freedom of people to purchase ration as per availability of funds with them.”

‘Delhi one of few states that are still to draft rules to operationalise NFSA’

The Abhiyan also pointed to the fact that the Delhi government has not put in place rules to operationalise the statutory provisions of NFSA related to transparency and accountability.

“The NFSA requires state governments to constitute a State Food Commission, undertake periodic social audits of functioning of ration shops, make rules for grievance redress. However, till date, despite orders from the Delhi High Court (attached), the government has not taken action on these issues. Delhi is one of the few states in the country which has not promulgated rules for grievance redress under the NFSA. No independent State Food Commission is functional in Delhi and information received under the RTI Act shows that no social audits have been undertaken,” it said.

The Abhiyan urged the Delhi government to immediately promulgate rules to put in place the statutory framework for grievance redress and accountability. “Further, in order to improve food security, the state government should put in funds to increase coverage of the population in Delhi under PDS (as scores of deserving and vulnerable households have been left out due to quotas) and enhancement of entitlements by including pulses and oil in PDS,” it demanded.

The food rights activists said disruptions in the PDS cause extreme hardship and exacerbate vulnerabilities of marginalised households. They recalled how earlier this year, the Delhi government had made Aadhaar based authentication through Point of Sale devices mandatory for all ration shops. “This had led to large exclusion of the poorest and marginalised families from their right to food. Government figures showed that nearly 4 lakh cardholders were unable to access their rations,” they said, adding that in light of the large scale exclusions and problems, the Delhi government had admitted to the problems of exclusions and rolled back the initiative.

After Universalising PoS and Iris Readers for PDS, AAP Govt Approves Doorstep Delivery of Rations

Food rights group says this is just a changing of goalposts, questions why rules have not been formulated and state food commission not constituted despite court nudge.

Food rights group says this is just a changing of goalposts, questions why rules have not been formulated and state food commission not constituted despite court nudge.

Representative image. Credit: Reuters

Representative image. Credit: Reuters

New Delhi: Though in order to overcome the problem of exclusions faced due to Aadhaar-linked Point of Sales (PoS) machines installed at ration shops, the Delhi cabinet today approved the scheme for doorstep delivery of rations under the Public Distribution System, food rights activists said the government is yet to issue a written order to delink Aadhaar from the system as promised by it late last month.

In the cabinet meeting, chaired by chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, the proposal for home delivery or doorstep delivery of rations under the targeted Public Distribution System (PDS) was approved for all beneficiaries. There are around 19.5 lakh ration cards in Delhi with 72 lakh beneficiaries.

Approving the Department of Food, Supply and Consumer Affairs’ proposal for providing doorstep delivery of wheat or flour, rice and sugar, under the National Food Security Act 2013, the Kejriwal government said the decision has been taken as it was committed to ensure that “eligible beneficiaries receive their due ration in a transparent manner with maximum ease”. The cabinet decision will now be sent to the Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal for his approval.

‘Ration beneficiaries were facing unforeseen trouble’

In a note, the government said “Aadhaar based identification of ration holders was one such reform, which has faced teething problems resulting in ration beneficiaries facing unforeseen trouble. Given this experience, doorstep delivery of ration is aimed at removing the problems faced by ration beneficiaries”.

The cabinet also took noted of the laws, rules and guidelines issued by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs that had urged the state governments to ensure home delivery of ration to the beneficiaries experiencing difficulty in getting their entitled quantum of subsidised foodgrain due to old age, physical disability etc.

‘Open bidding for selecting service provider’

It said the proposal was aimed at providing a higher level of transparency in delivery system through an inbuilt online monitoring system which will weed out corruption and diversion of food grains. “It will save time and resources of ration beneficiaries of Delhi.”

The Delhi government said “the service provider for home delivery of ration will be selected in a transparent manner through open bidding”.

‘This is just changing the goalposts, non-serious approach’

Anjali Bharadwaj of Satark Nagrik Sangathan and Right to Food Campaign, however, questioned the seriousness behind the idea. “What is doorstep delivery of rations? What is your policy framework? The postman will tell you that they find it difficult to look for houses in slums because they are numbered haphazardly. So will someone carry 35 kg of grains to these places? And what if the premises are found locked as people go out for work during daytime? Who will they leave the grains with or will they take them back? And what will happen if people would not get the delivery?” she asked.

“This is just changing the goalposts. We are sure the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) will come down heavily because they have invested so much on installing PoS machines and then iris readers and have then decided to move to doorstep delivery. Right now, you cannot manage your 2,500 ration shopkeepers, how will you manage 25,000 people needed for distributing these rations under the new scheme? The changing stance shows that they are completely non-serious about the entire issue.”

‘Where is notification for delinking Aadhaar from PDS?’

Bharadwaj charged that though deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia had declared a day after the Anshu Prakash incident that the meeting called at the chief minister’s residence was to discuss the doorstep delivery of ration card issue and not the issue of advertisements as had been claimed by Prakash in his assault complaint, the government had not followed up on its assurance to delink Aadhaar from the PDS system in Delhi. “Neither has any notification or any office order issued to the effect and our team which visited several rations shops recently found that beneficiaries were still being denied rations due to their biometrics not matching or not being accepted by the system.”

Bharadwaj said after completing the process of equipping all the ration shops in Delhi with PoS machines, the Delhi government recently also installed completed installation of iris readers in all of them. “So now apart from the ten digits on the hands, you also have the two eyes for the biometric authentication. But all this is linked to Aadhaar and that is where the problem lies,” she insisted.

‘Large-scale exclusions due to Aadhaar’

“There have been very large-scale exclusions due to Aadhaar in every place including Delhi. Right from the time that the National Food Security Act (NFSA), it was said that ration cards will not be issued to people who did not have Aadhaar numbers. This started in 2013-14 during the Congress government and carried on in this AAP government.”

Bharadwaj said by the time many got their Aadhaar cards made, the quota of ration had finished. “Under the NFSA there is a limit for the number of priority cards to be made and it is up to 70% for rural areas and up to 50% for urban areas. So for Delhi, the limit stood at 72 lakh beneficiaries. So they said the quota is finished and you can’t get it. So right from the beginning, people couldn’t get their cards made,” she said, adding that this quota has also not been revised so far.

Due to this, she said, in every public hearing her organisation conducted, it began hearing complaints of large scale exclusions apart from those of corruption and adulteration. With the Delhi government opting to install PoS devices in every shop, the complaints only grew.

Faults in the system

Then, she said, a pilot was started in 42 shops in 2016 and it went on for a year. “Again, we got huge complaints of exclusions during the exercise. By the end of this pilot, only about 20 shops remained because PoS was not working in the others and so the pilot failed miserably. The system was not working due to faulty machines, internet not working, biometric system not working or even electricity issues.”

Then, Bharadwaj said, SNS went to the Delhi high court as there were exclusions due to PoS and the Delhi government had not even promulgated rules under the NFSA. Bharadwaj said when the issue of rules was brought up in the high court, acting chief justice Geeta Mittal said the court was appalled at how so many people have been excluded.

“At first the Delhi Government said all the 41-odd testimonies provided by us were bogus. Then the court set up a court commissioner to enquire and he went house to house and found the exclusions to be genuine and reported the matter to the high court. The court then said all these people should get rations and rules should be promulgated,” she said.

‘Delhi government did not formulate rules under NFSA’

In 2017, the high court directed the Delhi government for formulate the rules, but that has not been done yet, she said.

Under the NFSA, she said, the Central government is supposed to provide the subsidy, the state government is supposed to put in certain rules for identification of beneficiaries, for transparency and for grievance redress and for social audit.

State Food Commission not been constituted

“Even the State Food Commission has not been constituted so far. It is a body for final appeal in matter related to rations just like the Central Information Commission (CIC) is for RTI related matters. This was to be done by the Delhi government. So right now the complaint goes to the department, whose officials are themselves being accused,” she said.

PoS machines installed in all shops despite failure of pilot scheme

The rights activists said in the meantime they also met the Food minister and Food Commissioner and demanded that the PoS machines be done away with but she said despite the pilot failing, it was universalised and in all the ration shops these machines were made mandatory from January 1, 2017.

As such, she said, huge problem began cropping up. “Again we did a public hearing on February 16 this year and took the matter to court. But still no rules were promulgated and Aadhaar was pushed mindlessly.”

Then, she said, the Anshu Prakash incident took place and Sisodia declared that Aadhaar would no longer remain a criteria for disbursal of rations. But despite the assertion, she said, no written order has been circulated. In the media briefing, Sisodia had also claimed that Prakash was called to discuss the rations issue as 2.5 lakh people were denied rations

It is not 2.5 lakh people who were denied rations, but over 20 lakh

Also, Bharadwaj noted that for January 2015 the PoS data showed that while there are 19.5 lakh ration cards and 72 lakh beneficiaries, out of this biometric failed for 35,000 families or about 1.5 lakh beneficiaries were denied rations. But, she said, the PoS online data also shows that there is biometric data for 4.5 lakh or nearly 20 lakh people.

She said investigations by SNS revealed that many of these people were engaged in such manual work like ironing clothes or picking stones, etc due to which their fingerprints are not recognised by the system at all. But, she lamented, that some officials try to pass these as bogus card holders. “How are bogus cards possible when each card has been made on an Aadhaar number,” she asked, noting that in the past, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also in a similar vein once stated that over 4.5 crore bogus cards had been detected.

;There is no checking by the Delhi government’

“The reality is that the Delhi Government is not doing any checking. As for the iris readers, she said, testimonies of beneficiaries obtained yesterday reveal that inn case of some the fingerprints and also iris scans are not matching and genuine beneficiaries from slums are being denied rations. “Thereafter I tweeted both Arvind and Manish about it.”

In such a scenario, she said the Delhi government should first delink the PDS system from Aadhaar and formulate the rules as per NFSA. Also, she said there is a provision for social audit in the law and nothing has been done to improve transparency and audit.

‘Doorstep delivery came as PoS failed’

Nagendra Sharma, media adviser to chief minister, told The Wire that “linking of ration shops to PoS was happening all over India and about 52% of all ration shops have been connected to the system”.

“In Delhi, the pilot began in all ration shops after preparation from January 1, 2017. It was to run for two months. But after just 10-12 days we began receiving general complaints that people were being denied rations. The Food Department had kept some margin for complaints and we had made up our mind to provide rations to those left out,” he said.

Stating that the complaints pertained to both the shop owners not being able to use the technology as also to denial of rations, he said that this is what prompted the government to “look out for some alternative”.

‘CM made up his mind on home delivery in January’

The Food Department, Sharma said, was by then also working on the iris reader system so that we would have something to fall back on. “But then in January itself, the chief minister told the food minister that we should start the home delivery scheme because the other schemes were not working out.  There was a lot of policy going back and forth on this. The view among the bureaucracy was that the error due to Aadhaar linkage was very little, but that was not the report from the ground,” he said.

As such, he said, in the Cabinet meeting on February 20 “it was decided that should hold the Aadhaar linkage for the time being. In the meantime, the preparation for doorstep delivery of rations was going on. Now the Cabinet has taken a decision. It is subject to the Lieutenant Governor now giving his approval to it”.

‘AAP tried to reform the system’

Sharma said the National Food Security Act kicked in in 2013 and that then for one year, there was no government. “The year 2014 was best left to the bureaucracy and L-G. In 2015, when we returned to power, the complaints were primarily of corruption and adulteration. In between, the margin money of ration sellers was raised from 70 paise per kg to Rs 2 per kg. This happened for the first time in history.”

As for the Aadhaar linkage, he said, “It was not expected that it would lead to problems. But that is why we decided to go for a pilot. As for the pilot undertaken at 42 shops, that was rather small. The government went by the assurances of the bureaucracy that things would work out well finally.”

‘No one is to be denied rations due to Aadhaar’

But now all those problems, he said, would be overcome through doorstep delivery. “PoS had come with a set of problems. The net does not work somewhere and fingerprints do not match. So we decided that rations will not be denied due to Aadhaar and the old system should continue,” he said.

However, he said, “The orders may not have reached the ration shops, but the department has been directed that no one should be denied rations due to Aadhaar matching.”