Deliberately Decided Not to Touch Top Two People in BJP, Congress: EC Chief

Chief election commissioner Rajiv Kumar was responding to a question from the ‘Scroll’ news website about why the commission did not rein in the prime minister’s remarks targeting Muslims.

New Delhi: When asked why the Election Commission (EC) did not act decisively against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s remarks targeting Muslims this general election, chief election commissioner Rajiv Kumar told Scroll it had “deliberately decided” it would “not touch” the top two leaders in the BJP and the Congress.

“We deliberately decided – this is such a huge nation – that the top two people in both the parties we did not touch. Both party presidents we touched equally,” Scroll quoted Kumar as saying on Monday (June 3).

The news outlet said Kumar was referring to Modi and home minister Amit Shah, and the Congress’s Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, when he said top two people in both parties.

During a speech in Rajasthan in April, Modi said that promises made in the Congress’s manifesto meant it would redistribute people’s wealth, including the mangalsutras worn by married Hindu women, to “those who produce more children” and “infiltrators” – terms he used to obliquely refer to Muslims.

The Wire and other media have reported that the Congress manifesto does not promise to do this.

The Congress complained to the EC about this speech. On the other hand the saffron party had lodged its own complaint to the poll body against Rahul Gandhi.

In its responses to these complaints the EC chose to address the two parties’ presidents rather than Modi and Gandhi specifically, and when it resolved the complaints – over a month after Modi’s Rajasthan speech – it directed the party presidents to in turn direct their star campaigners not to violate the regulatory model code of conduct.

Adding to his response to Scroll‘s question on Monday, Kumar added: “Why did we leave two this side and two that side? The persons in position in this huge country also have responsibility. We reminded them of their responsibility.”

When further of the usefulness of writing to the two parties’ presidents rather than to Modi and Gandhi, Kumar said: “So? What is the party president? Because of that party president’s direction, at least 80% of the second rung has not said anything.”

Scroll‘s report said he was referring to leaders such as BJP chief ministers and Union ministers – but Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, for example, has still made Islamophobic remarks this election.

Kumar also referred to the Delhi high court and the Supreme Court’s decisions not to entertain pleas seeking the EC act against Modi for model code violations.

“Twice it went to court … It is written in that order. Once to Delhi HC and once to SC. The thing which is judged … you cannot over and over say anything on that,” he said according to Scroll.

It is unclear which cases Kumar was referring to exactly, but both courts had dismissed petitions seeking Modi’s disqualification from the elections on account of alleged model code violations, with the high court saying it was up to the EC to take an independent view and the apex court saying the petitioner needed to approach the EC first.

The EC chief also said the commission “did not touch equally glaring things on the other side also” – apparently a reference to the opposition.

He added that “after all, you have to give a space to the topmost person to also feel responsible … If Mr [Jairam] Ramesh has said something, he is in a high position, he must feel responsible. When will you understand your responsibility?”, Scroll reported.

Narendra Modi Is on a Hindu-Muslim See-Saw in an Election Without Thrust and Thunder

Unlike in 2019, this time Modi is caught between conflicting pulls and pressures. Let us look at his campaign thrust during the past fortnight.

The absence of any dream scheme and the diminishing returns from Ayodhya have left the ruling party banking on the ‘Mulla-madrasa’ mantra.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi came out with a curious statement in an interview to a news channel, which he promptly posted on X after filing his nomination in Varanasi.

“The day I do Hindu-Musalman politics, I’ll be unworthy of public life. I resolve that I will not do such politics,” Modi said in the interview on May 14.

“I am shocked. Who told you that whenever one talks of people with more children, the inference is that they are Muslims? Why are you so unjust towards Muslims?” he asked, contending that having more children than a family could look after was a problem irrespective of religion.

Not only this, he said that in his childhood, his family celebrated Eid. Their Muslim neighbours would send them food, so no food would be cooked at their home on that day. “I grew up in that society,” Modi recounted nostalgically.

Was May 14 a Buddha-like enlightenment moment for Modi? Is he really a transformed person?

He was chief minister of Gujarat in 2002 when at least 1,000 people were killed in the riots, most of them Muslims, and a lakh were uprooted. Unofficial figures put the number of dead at 2,000. Modi had said he was sad, and would be sad even if a puppy came under the wheels of a car. Had he now changed?

However, the veil was blown off within a few hours and he was back to spreading the fear of Muslim reservation.

This has prompted a commentator to describe Narendra Modi as a ‘loner’ who alone decides the policy his party must follow, with no one else aware of what will he do next or in a position to seek an explanation from him.

Why then did he suddenly shift gear and claim his remarks on Muslims were “misinterpreted” by the media and his opponents? No one in the so-called mainstream media came forward to question the allegation of misinterpretation.

For the first time, Modi is fighting an election without the bulldozing effect of a sweeping campaign theme. In 2002, the polarisation linked to the Gujarat riots helped him sweep the polls. The lasting communal divide facilitated his victory in the state’s subsequent elections too. In 2014, he romped to power at the Centre on the crest of a ‘weak regime versus a can-do image’ with full corporate back-up.

But unlike in 2019, this time he encounters an election without the Balakot wave and the 56-inch imagery. The Ayodhya effect appears to be wearing off although every time the opposition raises the issue of job creation, the BJP counters by springing the fear of a ‘Babri lock’.

Going back to Modi’s brief climbdown on May 14, that appears to have more to do with the Election Commission notice on opposition complaints of violation of the model code of conduct with hate speech. Such a recorded explanation could help the poll panel to dispose of his case with a mild warning. BJP president J.P. Nadda has already responded to the commission on these lines.

For the first time, the Election Commission had, instead of serving the notice on the alleged violator, sent it to the party president. Several Opposition leaders had filed complaints against Modi.

At Banswara last month, he had said that if the Congress came to power, it would distribute the country’s wealth among ‘those who have more children’. ‘Population jihad’ has been an age-old argument by the RSS parivar that stokes religious hatred among the majority community. Modi himself was quoted using the words ‘ham paanch, hamare pachees (we are five, we have 25 children)’ in Gujarat to mock the Muslim population. Soon after his speech in Banswara, the prime minister’s economic advisory council came out with a report that gave credence to the idea of population jihad.

 This thesis, however, was strongly contested by independent economists.

While the elaborate explanations in the interview on points raised by the opposition in complaints to the Election Commission should help it let him off lightly, the discomfort among many BJP allies might also have played on Modi’s mind. Chandrababu Naidu and Chirag Paswan have put on record their opposition to hate politics. Differing with the BJP, Naidu has said he would implement 4% reservation for Muslims if he won in Andhra Pradesh.

Paswan, who rejoined the NDA on the eve of this election, said there was no need for the BJP to spread hate against a religion. He would be worried about the impact on his Muslim supporters.

Also read: How the Election Commission Is Failing the Hate Speech Test

Shiromani Akali Dal, a traditional BJP ally that snapped ties, has warned Modi against outbursts against religious minorities.

A third reason could be that the prime minister had sought to make a course correction when the fall in the voting percentage suggested a change in voter mood. The Election Commission has run a special drive, especially among the new voters. After the first two rounds, it has been coming out with final polling percentage data to reassure the people that there was no voter fatigue. But the participation and crowd response at public rallies is also lukewarm, with the anti-Muslim appeals failing to evoke much of a response.

Another explanation has been that the mood change has forced the prime minister to adopt what political scientist Suhas Palshikar calls a dual approach, and address different constituencies differently.

His outreach programme last year was aimed at Muslim groups in certain pockets. Christians in Kerala and the northeast and Pasmanda Muslims in the north were targeted to win over support.

Whatever the reason, the paradox of playing the hard Hindutva card and also seeking minority support is beginning to hurt the prime minister. The contradictory postures will have an adverse effect, leaving Modi highly vulnerable to accusations.

Unlike in 2019, this time Modi is caught between conflicting pulls and pressures. Let us look at his campaign thrust during the past fortnight:

If Samajwadi Party and Congress come to power, they will bulldoze the Ram temple and send Ram Lalla back to the tent. They should take ‘tuition’ from Adityanath on how to use the bulldozer at the right place,” Modi said. Adityanath’s bulldozer has mostly demolished properties of Muslims.

Modi said that the Congress would allocate 15% of the budget to Muslims if it wins. Responding to this, former finance minister Chidambaram said the prime minister’s ‘speech writers have lost their balance’

 At Dhar, Modi said on May 6 that he wanted a mandate with 400 seats to ensure the Congress did not bring back Article 370 and put a ‘Babri lock’ on Ram temple.

However, in a TV interview later, he denied having said so.

Then again at a rally on May 16 at Zaidpur, he warned that if the INDIA bloc got a chance, they would bulldoze the Ram temple. And so it continues.

P. Raman is a veteran journalist.

‘Can’t Presume EC Won’t Do Anything’: Delhi HC Rejects Plea for FIR Against PM’s Communal Speeches

‘We cannot decide as to whom the ECI should issued notice…’

New Delhi: The Delhi high court has called a petition asking for a first information report to be registered against Prime Minister Narendra Modi over the communal nature of his recent speeches, “misconceived.”

Bar and Bench has reported that Justice Sachin Datta rejected the petition, saying that it was “without merit” as the Election Commission was already seized of the matter.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

“We cannot decide as to whom the ECI should issued notice… We can’t presume that they won’t do anything. They can’t register an FIR first and then seek response,” the high court bench said.

Justice Datta also said that the Court cannot micromanage the ECI.

Justice Datta also said that the court cannot “micromanage the ECI.”

Starting from Banswara in Rajasthan in late April, the prime minister has been making openly communal remarks in his speeches as he campaigns seeking a third term in office. Accusing the Congress of planning to snatch their wealth to distribute it to Indian Muslims, he referred to the community as “those with more children” and “infiltrators.”

The petition referred to this speech, along with Modi’s speech in Madhya Pradesh on April 24 where he alleged that the Congress party had given reservation based on religion, as well as speeches by BJP president J.P. Nadda and Union minister Anurag Thakur.

The petitioners, represented by advocate Nizam Pasha, said that the poll body had taken action against Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K. Chandrashekhar Rao but has not issued even a notice to Modi.

“Why is this individual [Modi] being treated differently from others? Their [ECI] notice is to the political party. It doesn’t even mention the speech,” he said, according to Bar and Bench. 

“Why advisory for this person and action against others? The rule of law has to be equal for all,” he added.

Advocate Suruchi Suri who appeared for the EC said the BJP received an extension in the deadline, which is now May 15, to respond to the notice.

She said that action “will be taken as per law if needed.”

‘Congress Will Snatch Your Wealth, Give It to Muslims’, BJP Warns Hindus in Campaign Video

Gone are the thinly-veiled euphemisms Modi used in his Banswara speech – ‘infiltrators’ and those “having more children”. The party’s latest video directly names and targets Muslim Indians – against the backdrop of lurid, Amar Chitra Katha-style art.

New Delhi: If Prime Minister Narendra Modi had not made it amply clear in Banswara a few days ago that religious polarisation is his primary electoral strategy as he seeks a third consecutive term in office, the Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday hammered the messaging down officially. In an animated video posted on its official Instagram handle, the BJP pushed Modi’s central assertions that the Congress, if elected, would distribute Hindu wealth and property to Muslims – whom it describes as the opposition party’s “favourite community”.

Gone are the thinly-veiled euphemisms Modi used in his speech – ‘infiltrators’ and those “having more children”. The party’s video directly names and targets Muslim Indians – against the backdrop of lurid, Amar Chitra Katha-style art. Rahul Gandhi is shown holding the Congress manifesto whose cover morphs into a Muslim League flag.

As shocking as it may appear to be in the world’s largest democracy, it has become something of a habit over the past 10 years for the BJP to turn India’s elections into an exercise in perpetuating hate against Muslims.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

Every time, opposition parties have attempted in the Modi years to raise concerns like rising inequality, livelihood worries, poor public education and health infrastructure, and other issues around economic and social justice, the BJP and its leaders have made it a point to pull the political discourse back to the manufactured Hindu-Muslim binary.  

Take a look at the tone of the BJP’s polarising video. It says, “If the Congress Party comes to power, it will snatch all the money and wealth of non-Muslims and distribute it to Muslims. Their favourite community!” 

It goes on to repeat the same untruth Modi first uttered on the campaign trail – that former Congress prime minister Manmohan Singh had said Muslims have the first claim on resources. In fact Singh, in a 2006  speech, had identified Dalits, Adivasis, OBCs and Muslims as marginalised groups which should get preferential treatment by way of affirmative action. Another video from 2009 that the BJP has begun gleefully circulating has Manmohan standing by his assertion of the minorities, “if poor”, having a “prior claim”.

The BJP’s video then repeats the falsehood that the Hindu Right has been propagating ever since it has existed:

“Ancient India was really beautiful. We were so rich and prosperous that each and every average citizen had plenty of gold. Plenty of wealth. Plenty of riches. And it was precisely because of our prosperity that invaders, terrorists, robbers and thieves used to come again and again, used to loot all our treasures. They used to redistribute the loot among themselves. And on top of that they used to ruin our temples. And the Congress Party has been empowering people who belong to the very same community.”

Leaving aside the gratuitous and false claim that Muslim Indians today are responsible – as a ‘community’ – for the destruction of temples, the BJP’s simplistic story line has been dismissed multiple times by reputed historians as lacking any veracity. Historians have said that Indian history is full of complex politics and power struggles that can’t simply be reduced to ‘Hindu-Muslim rivalry’. However, the prevailing political climate in India has given more and more power to the communal understanding of history. In power at the Centre and in many states, the BJP has made it a point to colour school and college textbooks on Indian history with a narrow understanding of the discipline in its attempt to project a ‘glorious past’ that was ruined by “Muslims”.  

The BJP’s video perpetuates the same myth about Indian history in order to buttress allegations Modi has made about the Congress confiscating the mangalsutras and gold of “our sisters and mothers” and distributing it to Muslims or opposition leaders behaving like the Mughals “who found perverse joy in demolition of temples and defiling places of worship”.

“If you are a non-Muslim, Congress will snatch your wealth and distribute it to Muslims. Narendra Modi knows of this evil plan! Only he has the strength to stop it. If you really care about the Bharatiya Civilisation, you need to go out and vote for Modi! ‘Ab ki baar 400 paar’ is the absolute need of the hour.”

The BJP’s  communal overdrive has surprised observers, given the fact that only a month ago the prime minister appeared to be banking on what he said were his achievements over the past 10 years and his self-proclaimed ‘commitment’ to turn India into a developed nation by 2047. 

The opposition’s consistent campaign on issues of social justice seems to have pushed the BJP back into its original avatar. The Congress has been demanding a pan-India caste census that will help the government  reframe its affirmative action policy in a way that resources could be distributed evenly among underrepresented groups among the marginalised communities. The fact that some BJP leaders have openly spoken about how a two-third majority for the BJP in the Lok Sabha could help the party ‘rewrite the Constitution’ also seems to have sent a negative message to communities who have been guaranteed reservation in jobs and educational institutions by the Constitution.

The BJP’s latest communal offensive against Muslims appears to be a tactic to offset any possible electoral losses because of the opposition’s campaign around such social justice issues.

When the demand for a caste census was first made by the Opposition last year, it had left the Modi government stunned. Party leaders felt they could neither support nor oppose the idea. 

The BJP relies entirely on consolidating different Hindu caste groups under the Hindutva umbrella for electoral success. It has been decidedly anti-Muslim in its political rhetoric and has also denied Muslims any political representation under its banner. In power, the saffron party has shown that polarisation, both along the lines of religion and caste, has been its only game. While it has depended on pitting Hindus against Muslims, it has also stoked animosity between politically-dominant backward groups against other marginalised but somewhat underrepresented communities among the Hindus. 

With the opposition picking up the cause of social justice, which has historically opened up room for backward class assertion, the BJP may have perceived a looming threat to its politically-effective strategy of consolidating Hindus. 

In damage control mode, the saffron party clearly believes its anti-Muslim legacy could yet again prove to be an ace diversionary tactic – except that such divisive rhetoric targeting Muslims doesn’t stop at the level of speeches. It empowers Hindu Right militancy on the ground and leaves a large section of Indian minorities feeling threatened and anxious. There is ample evidence that anti-Muslim violence has been on an upswing in India over the past decade. Communal prejudices against Muslims have reached a new high, threatening social cohesion and the unique ability of Indians from diverse backgrounds to coexist.

For the BJP to release such a blatantly communal video when the Election Commission (EC) has served notice on the party president for the polarising language used by its ‘star campaigner’ (Modi) at Banswara suggests it is in no mood to forsake the benefits an anti-Muslim campaign will bring. The video also means the BJP is confident that the EC will turn a blind eye to any complaints that come its way.

Bharat Adivasi Party: Battling BJP’s Hindutva, One Election at a Time

In the southernmost Adivasi region of Rajasthan, the challenge to the deeply communal politics of the BJP and the opportunism of the Congress is building up election by election.

Dungarpur-Banswara (Rajasthan): In Rajasthan the elections are done, the EVMs are under close watch awaiting counting. But some changes do not stop with the elections; neither did they begin with them. In the southernmost Adivasi region of this traditionally bipolar state, the challenge to the deeply communal politics of the BJP and the opportunism of the Congress is building up election by election.

When members of the Adivasi Parivar, an ideological group that emerged from Adivasi student politics in 2015, first entered electoral politics, few had heard of them. They contested nine seats in the 2018 assembly elections under the banner of the Bharatiya Tribal Party which had emerged in neighbouring Gujarat. Six years later, after splitting from the BTP, the new Bharat Adivasi Party (BAP) has become a national headline. Across the constituency of Dungarpur-Banswara, the visual imagery tells its own story.

At a bus stop, a group of children in their school uniforms sit on a bench posing for a picture. Behind them is a picture of Bhilu Rana or Rana Punja, a 16th-century Bhil warrior who is said to have fought alongside Rana Pratap, put up by the Adivasi Parivar.

A group of students gathered at a bus stop. Photo: Ananta Jain

A few kilometres away, at the Chokaodia bus stand, there is another poster of Bhilu Rana by the Adivasi Parivar.

What is the Adivasi Parivar, I ask them, and the response is immediate: “BAP.”

On the side of the road, the group has also put up a picture of a martyred jawan named Ratan Lal Pargi. The landscape is dotted with the iconography of tribal martyrs and symbols erected by the BAP.

An image of martyred jawan Ratan Lal Paragi. Photo: Ananta Jain

In sharp contrast, looming over a bend on an undulating road, is a billboard of Narendra Modi, dressed as an ascetic, pilgrim or priest, with the words “Aastha se khilwar nahee (No playing around with faith”. It conveys the thrust of the BJP’s campaign here.

Further along the road, near the entrance of a village, a double-storey brightly painted building stands out among smaller homes and huts. A generic Ram-Ayodhya flag flies from the building and a local village shop. Standing out, a few of the smaller dwellings bear either the Adivasi Parivar flag or the banner of the Bharat Adivasi Party.

Contrasting flags in the village. Photo: Ananta Jain

The most striking image, though, is of a majestic tree, framed by the rolling Aravallis in the background with a word hung in coloured letters shaped out of wire, that spells “Johar”, a salutation used by tribal communities.

Amit Kharadi, 28, smiles as he sees us taking pictures, “For generations they coloured us in saffron, but no more, our roots are stronger.”

In the past few months, Kharadi and his team have been campaigning for the BAP candidate from the Udaipur Lok Sabha constituency. In 2023, Kharadi contested the assembly elections from Udaipur Rural. Victory was never in sight but he more than fulfilled his aim – of establishing a presence in a BJP stronghold.

In village after village, Kharadi is recognised. Old women come to bless him, young girls shake his hand, then giggle, and a group of men help him campaign.

Amit Kharadi. Photo: Ananta Jain

“You’re just 15 kilometres from Udaipur, did you ever think you’d see the influence and popularity of our work and ideology?” he asks.

This is remarkable. Tribal communities in Udaipur, also a reserved constituency, have for decades been influenced by the RSS’s Vanvasi Kalyan Parishad (VKP), which has set up schools that have systematically worked to assimilate the Adivasis into the Hindu fold.

“They keep putting saffron flags on our icons, we keep throwing them off,” says Karadi.

In August 2012, the Bhils had staged a massive protest in Udaipur ,accusing the BJP of hoisting a saffron flag on a statue of Rana Punja. The Adivasi Parivar projects Bhilu Rana as a great warrior who had fought many battles, but stay away from the BJP’s attempts to cast these battles as struggles between Hindus and Muslims. They also take umbrage at attempts to claim a Rajput identity for Bhilu Rana.

Till the BAP established a foothold, the VKP’s work had kept this region clear of independent tribal formations, such as the Gondwana Gantantra Party in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. The Bhils were seen as “saffronised tribals”, whether they voted the BJP or the Congress.

“I’ve voted for the BJP twice, earlier always for the Congress, but ever since my son joined BAP and I realised why, my vote will go to them,” says 75-year-old Bana Ram Bhil from Chanbora village. “This is our land and yet it is never in our name,” he adds, echoing the BAP’s key campaign thrust – ownership of land by the region’s Adivasis.

Also read: How an Adivasi Party is Changing Political Equations in Southern Rajasthan’s Tribal Districts

At Undari Khurd villge, Kishan Pargi, a young lawyer, the first in his village to have done graduate studies, summarises the political thinking among his people: “Earlier, we saw the symbol of the hand and simply voted for it. Then came Modiji. Even if you nominate a donkey as a candidate, people will see Modji and vote BJP. BAP has upturned that.” Along with the influence of “Hindu dharma”, Pargi says there were some appealing schemes such as the PM’s Awaas Yojana but they did not materialise on the ground.

Pargi points to a small hut on a hill top with a little field surrounding it. “Bhils have a small home and then farm the land around it. The PM Awaas Yojana reaches just a few; when it does, it only gives us land to build a room, maybe a kitchen, but we don’t own the land around it. The Van Vibhag (Forest Department) and the government acquire it.”

The field described by Kishan Pargi. Photo: Ananta Jain

Land, both emotively and materially, is a powerful issue. Karadi says it has taken them years to go village to village explaining the importance of owning it, “We want to win elections, of course, but we also have to ensure our cadre is strong so that it can take our message to the people, it takes patience and maybe several election losses.”

No one understands the need for patience better than Kanti Roat, a founding member of the Rajasthan wing of what was then the BTP. I first met him in 2018 when he was helping his colleagues contest the assembly elections while planning his own election debut from the tribal Dungarpur-Banswara Lok Sabha seat.

At the time, we had followed his campaign trail. Given the lack of funds and resources, he and his supporters, on motorcycles, seemed like an unlikely challenge to the Congress or the BJP. But the BAP’s resonance on the ground was palpable, so much so that even then, the candidates from both these parties spent more time abusing the new formation than they did each other.

In several villages, Kanti would stop to show us evidence of what he called the erosion of tribal culture – saffron flags, Gita schools, new temples with the pantheon of mainstream Hindu deities, women in ghunghat. “Generations earlier, we’re told Adivasi women didn’t cover their heads. We will have to shift things gently but for us our work goes beyond elections.”

It is this cadre-like quality that empowers the BAP to take on the RSS. BAP’s members have a counter to every Hindutva theme spun by the BJP and the RSS. “We don’t have resources for big rallies, we do something more effective – meetings starting from the fala level, going up to the panchyat, mandal, block and zila.” Anticipating our need for an explanation, he added that a fala is a “gaon ka tukra (a piece of a village)”.

In 2018, the BTP hit national headlines, when Rajkumar Roat won the Chorasi seat and Ram Prasad Dindor won Sagwara. Kanti Roat managed to secure more than two lakh votes in the 2019 Lok Sabha from Dugarpur-Banswara.

We returned, five years later, in November 2023, shortly before assembly elections in the state. “Have you come to check if I’ve secretly joined the BJP or am BJP’s B team,” Kanti asked jokingly, referring to the allegation by local Congress leaders.

There was then talk in the air of a possible Congress-BAP alliance, but it didn’t go through.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

BAP’s view of the Congress is hardly flattering. Politically, unlike the BJP, the Congress is not anathema to them but on the ground, they feel there is little to separate the Congress’s tribal leadership from the Hindutva brigade.

Kanti repeated what he had told us earlier, “Remember, this Hinduisation has occurred as much under the BJP as during Congress terms.” He spoke of how the Congress and the BJP came together to defeat BAP members in panchayat election and by-elections.

Much had happened in the past five years since we’d been there. Kanti had a near-fatal car accident which had left him bedridden for more than a year. When the BAP split from the BTP, they had to battle the Election Commission to get themselves registered, and then fight again for a symbol.

Their first choice, a plough and a farmer, was rejected. They finally settled for a hockey stick, a symbol which connects them to their beloved hero, an icon of Adivasi communities, Jaipal Munda, who was the captain of India’s hockey team and the only Adivasi in the Constituent Assembly of India.

Munda’s electrifying speeches in the Assembly are a reminder of how the Indian State has failed to keep the promises it made to Adivasi communities. “The tragedy is the decades of BJP-Congres rule has stuffed our people’s head with bhagwa nonsense, our own people have forgotten Munda. We first had to tell them about him and then explain the symbol so they can vote for BAP.”

Once again, we followed Kanti across a stretch of Dungarpur, remote villages, spread out and sparsely inhabited, typical of Bhil settlements. He stopped at a shop to buy us three flags, one white, one red and one black, each replete with the symbolism of colour. These are our “dharm jhandas”, he explained before quoting Jaipal Munda’s speech in the Constituent Assembly to us, “Our people have their own flags, each village has one and no one can challenge it. We honour two flags, one which is our ancient Adivasi flag, the other which is the flag of India.

At another village, Kanti took us inside a shrine, pointing to a series of stone idols, “These are our traditional deities but look at the walls of the shrine, a man from this village joined the police, thought he’d become an important Hindu and coloured the walls saffron.”

Kanti Lal at the Adivasi Temple. Photo: Ananta Jain

In conversations in the villages, while there was consensus on issues related to ownership of land, cultural issues led to greater debates. In Amliya Fala village, an elderly woman asks if it is alright for them to put up Ram flags. Gently, Kanti tells her she should do what she believes in, then engages her in a discussion of their own mythological stories.

Even political rivals seem influenced by the BAP. In Udaipur city, I met a prominent BJP Bhil leader from a political family who was in the running for a ticket. He admitted to a disillusionment with the party, saying that when it comes to ticket distribution, the BJP picks Bhil candidates who are willing puppets. This seemed to be as much about his personal disappointment as it was from an admiration for BAP, which he expressed openly. He did ask for his name to be withheld.

Also read: Real Target of Modi’s Banswara Speech Was Idea of Equitable Distribution of Wealth

In the 2024 elections, BAP has contested six seats in Rajasthan, a total of 20 seats nationally. The MLA from Chorasi, Rajkumar Roat, one of BAP’s founding member, is a serious contender from Dungarpur-Banswara. Roat has not had it easy. When he filed his nomination on a camel, a case against cruelty to animals was registered against him. As his campaign picked up, on the last day of nominations, two independent candidates, also called Rajkumar Roat, filed their candidature.

“You know who is behind this, this smells of Malviya and his likes,” Roat told us, referring to Mahendra Jeet Singh Malviya. Once the Congress’s most prominent face in the region, Malviya switched to the BJP shortly before the 2024 elections and fought the Banswara Lok Sabha seat on a BJP ticket.

Rajkumar Roat. Photo: Facebook/Rajkumar Roat

This was compounded by the Congress’s spectacularly embarrassing and ineffectual attempts to have an alliance with BAP. For a fortnight leading up to the last day for withdrawing nominations, journalists had to keep changing the stories they were filing – from an alliance which was on, then off. A Congress candidate even filed his nomination. Twenty-four hours later, the Congress was back in an alliance with BAP.

But as the last hour to withdraw nominations neared, the Congress was unable to get their candidate, Amit Damor, to withdraw. Damor fought the elections on the Congress symbol while his party supported Roat. For BAP supporters, such confusion has deepened a sense of unease with a party they feel will never see them as an equal.

Irrespective of Congress support, or whether he is able to secure a victory, Rajkumar Roat’s candidature has displayed BAP’s strength in the region. It has even forced Prime Minister Narendra Modi to come to Banswara. BAP supporters claim his visit came on the back of extensive rumour-mongering by the BJP, “They’ve gone around telling people, tribal and non-tribal, that if the BAP comes to power then we will give their daughters to Muslims. They have vilified Muslims, they are demonising tribals, but we will turn the tide.”

It is no surprise that this is where Modi chose to deliver his now infamous speech about Muslims. Despicable as it was, it should count as his tribute to the strength of the BAP.

Rajasthan: Adivasi Might vs Modi’s Speech in Banswara; Om Birla Takes on a Former Friend in Kota

Prime Minister Modi’s speech in Banswara has put the spotlight on the constituency, where the tribal party — Bharat Adivasi Party’s — popularity has promised a closely fought electoral battle. 

Jaipur: After a low turnout in the first phase of the Lok Sabha elections, the 13 remaining parliamentary constituencies in Rajasthan — Barmer, Banswara, Jalore, Udaipur, Rajsamand, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Ajmer, Kota, Pali, Jodhpur, Jhalawar-Baran and Tonk-Sawai Madhopur are all set to vote on April 26, Friday. 

With crucial, neck-and-neck electoral battles set to take place in particularly some seats in western and southern Rajasthan, the political campaign has also seen increased animosity between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and opposition Congress. 

After the first phase of polling in 12 seats of Rajasthan concluded on April 19, data from the Election Commission of India (ECI) has suggested that the voter turnout was 57.87%, lower than the 63.71% turnout in 2019, when the BJP and its allies won all 25 Lok Sabha seats in the state. 

Amid speculations that the low voter turnout won’t benefit the BJP, Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself launched a scathing attack on the Congress with his now controversial speech in Banswara where he claimed that if Congress comes to power, it will redistribute wealth among “those with more children” referring to Muslims. 

Banswara has become one of the most closely fought seats in Rajasthan, where the electoral might of the BJP is against a candidate of the Bharat Adivasi Party (BAP), to which the Congress has extended its support.

While back in 2019, a speech delivered by Prime Minister Modi in Churu after the Balakot airstrikes wherein he vowed that he won’t let India bow down had resulted in massive support for the BJP, his recent speech in Banswara has resulted in opposition parties slamming the BJP for targeting Muslims.

With both the Congress and BJP going all guns blazing in the second phase, here’s a look at the key electoral battles in some of the constituencies in the northern state which will vote on April 26.

Banswara: Adivasi might vs Modi’s speech 

In Banswara, where Modi delivered his controversial speech, the BJP has fielded Mahendrajeet Singh Malviya, a Congress turncoat who switched to the saffron party earlier this year. A local strongman who has been a multiple-time MLA and MP, Malviya holds substantial clout in the region. On the other hand, the main challenger to Malviya is Rajkumar Roat, second-term MLA from Chorasi and a leader from the the BAP. 

In recent times, the BAP has emerged as a formidable force in Banswara-Dungapur and presently holds three seats in the 200-member Rajasthan assembly. The massive crowds that Roat and the BAP have been drawing has even made the Congress extend its support to the tribal party. However, the Congress’s election symbol will also be listed on polling day, courtesy its rogue candidate Arvind Damor, who didn’t withdraw his nomination despite the grand old party extending its support to BAP. 

Prime Minister Modi’s speech in Banswara has put the spotlight on the constituency, where the tribal party’s popularity has promised a closely fought electoral battle. 

Battle for Barmer and other seats in western Rajasthan

One of the most anticipated electoral battles will be witnessed in the border district of Barmer, where a triangular fight is being played out. The Congress and its ally RLP are supporting the candidature of Ummedaram Beniwal, who recently had switched to Congress from the RLP. Beniwal is up against incumbent MP from Barmer and Union minister Kailash Choudhary, who is eyeing a second consecutive term from the seat. 

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

While Beniwal and Choudhary are both Jats — members of the Jat community form a substantial chunk of voters in the Barmer seat — the electoral contest has been made triangular by the entry of independent MLA from Barmer’s Sheo Ravindra Singh Bhati, 26, who enjoys massive popularity among the youth. Social media has been abuzz with huge crowds that Bhati has been drawing in his election campaign wherein he claims to have the support of all communities including Muslims, who also form a crucial vote bank. It is speculated that Bhati, a Rajput, will secure the support of his community, which is otherwise traditional voters of the BJP, making the outcome of the battle in Barmer more unpredictable with two Jat and one Rajput candidate. 

In Jodhpur, Union Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat is eyeing a third term from the seat and has now been challenged by the Congress’s Karan Singh Uchiyarda, another fellow Rajput. Ever since his candidature, Uchiyarda has been vociferously taking on Shekhawat and the BJP. In neighbouring Jalore, former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot’s son Vaibhav Gehlot is pitted against the BJP’s Lumbaram Choudhary. Back in 2019, Vaibhav Gehlot had unsuccessfully contested the Lok Sabha elections from Jodhpur and was defeated by Shekhawat. 

The other seat in western Rajasthan that will see polling on Friday is Pali, where the BJP’s PP Chaudhary will take on the Congress’s Sangeeta Beniwal. 

Electoral fight in Mewar, BJP’s bastion

Four seats in Mewar region — Udaipur, Rajsamand, Bhilwara and Chittorgarh will also see polling on Friday. The Mewar region is a stronghold of the BJP, where the party’s state president and incumbent MP from the seat C.P. Joshi is contesting the Lok Sabha elections from the Chittorgarh constituency against veteran Congress leader Udailal Anjana. In Udaipur, BJP’s Manna Lal Rawat is pitted against retired bureaucrat Tarachand Meena, who has been fielded by the Congress party. 

Senior Congress leader and former Union Minister C.P. Joshi has been fielded from Bhilwara, and will take on the BJP’s Damodar Agarwal. The BJP has fielded Mahima Kumari Mewar, a member of the erstwhile Udaipur royal family, while the Congress candidate is Damodar Gurjar. 

In Hadoti region, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla faces an old friend, Raje’s son eyes fifth term

One of the most interesting electoral battles is taking place in Kota, where former BJP MLA Prahlad Gunjal joined the Congress just before the elections and is up against incumbent Kota MP and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Once close friends who rose up through the ranks of the BJP, the fallout between the duo has resulted in a high pitched election campaign. 

Gunjal comes from the Gurjar community and enjoys substantial support in the Hadoti region, while Birla has been winning the seat since 2014. 

In Jhalawar-Baran, former Rajasthan chief minister Vasundhara Raje’s son Dushyant Singh is eyeing a fifth term from the seat and is pitted against Congress’s Urmila Jain Bhaya. While Raje has been missing in action from the state’s politics ever since the BJP opted for Bhajan Lal Sharma for the post of the chief minister, the veteran leader has been actively campaigning for her son in Jhalawar. 

Electoral battle in Sachin Pilot’s backyard

The electoral contest in Tonk-Sawai Madhopur is interesting because the constituency is the area of influence of former deputy chief minister and incumbent Tonk MLA Sachin Pilot. While the Congress has banked its hopes on Harish Meena, a Pilot loyalist who is also an MLA from the region, the BJP has once again fielded Sukhbir Singh Jaunapuria, who has won the seat two consecutive times since 2014. 

While Jaunapuria is from the Gurjar community, it is expected that Meena will also get some support from the community owing to the fact that Pilot, who is also a Gurjar enjoys massive support from the community. 

In neighbouring Ajmer, BJP leader and incumbent MP from the seat Bhagirath Choudhary will take on Ramchandra Choudhary of the Congress. 

Real Target of Modi’s Banswara Speech Was Idea of Equitable Distribution of Wealth

The prime minister’s speech is polarising in more ways than one. His remarks didn’t merely demonise the Muslims but also sought to pit the poor against each other.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s rabidly Islamophobic remarks in recent election speeches betrays a degree of nervousness in the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’s ranks. A low turnout in the first phase of the Lok Sabha polls, lack of enthusiasm among party workers and an evident sense of resentment against BJP parliamentarians on the ground may have forced Modi to go full tilt communal once again. Religious polarisation as a diversionary electoral tactic has been employed by the BJP every time it has felt anxious about its prospects. However, it appears that Modi is trying out something new this time around.

Describing Muslims as those who procreate more than any other community has been a lie that the Sangh parivar has historically perpetuated among the Hindus. Modi, however, chose to propagate the notion in the Adivasi-dominated Banswara in Rajasthan. The Bhil community forms nearly 70% of the population in the Banswara-Dungarpur Lok Sabha constituency.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

Here, Rajkumar Roat, the leader of the Bharatiya Adivasi Party (BAP) and a popular MLA, has been leading a spirited campaign to secure the Adivasi’s right to the region’s resources. The Bhils have organised themselves over the years in the largely feudal Rajasthan to raise concerns around what they call are issues of their jal, jangal and zameen (water, forests and land). The community’s militant assertion has upset the status quo and existing electoral equations. Roat is contesting the Lok Sabha elections for the first time in 2024. The Congress had announced its own candidate earlier but has now unofficially entered into an alliance with BAP.  It is asking its supporters to vote for Roat, even as its own candidate refused to withdraw his nomination.

Modi’s hateful speech against Muslims was made against such a backdrop, where he incited fear in his Adivasi audience about the Congress’s alleged plans to “distribute their wealth” among Muslims. Such a claim is, of course, false. But that is not the point.

The biggest long term threat for the two-term prime minister is one where he may be seen as aiding concentration of wealth in a few hands. Indeed, the perception has slowly been gaining ground, given that almost all opposition parties have been talking about growing inequality under his regime.

Watch: ‘Modi’s Majoritarianism Is a Poison and Cancer That Can Destroy the Soul of India’: Ramachandra Guha

Some of his welfare measures  are directed at mitigating the threat, even as his government has gone the whole hog in privatising nearly everything.

The Congress has backed its campaign on the rising gap between the rich and the poor with data, and attributed this trend to the Modi government’s cronyism and its evident policy tilt towards privatising mining and other industrial activities, public services, jobs, education and institutions.

Rajkumar Roat. Photo: Facebook/Rajkumar Roat

The Congress manifesto is anchored to the principle of socio-economic justice for the poor, and promises a range of welfare measures for them. The BAP, and other emerging Adivasi forces across India, have also raised such criticisms of the Modi government. Any advocacy by the Adivasis on equitable distribution of country’s resources directly serves as a roadblock to the Modi government’s pro-corporate predisposition and Hindu nationalist ideology.

The prime minister’s speech is polarising in more ways than one. His remarks didn’t merely demonise the Muslims but also sought to pit the poor against each other.

The Sachar committee reported that Indian Muslims are one of the most disadvantaged groups in India, with poor levels in nearly all parameters of socio-economic development. Precisely for this reason, former Congress Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2006 had clubbed Muslims with Dalits and Adivasis as the ‘first claimants’ on the country’s resources. The BJP has since then mischievously spun his statement to propagate the lie that the Congress believes Muslims should be the first rightful owner of India’s resources.

The BJP has been fairly successful in bringing a large section of Dalits into the Hindutva fold in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. It has been able to convince these communities that the emphasis of secular parties on securing Muslim votes in successive elections has led to their socio-economic and political marginalisation. At the same time, the BJP gave representation to many non-dominant and under-represented Dalit groups to lure them, even as other parties struggled to do that. The BJP, of course, could accommodate them better as its policy to block out Muslim representation in its party opens up space for under-represented communities from amongst Hindus.

Also read: The ‘Muslim League Imprint’ on Modern-Day Hindutva’s Ideological Ancestors

Now, Modi appears to be implementing a similar strategy to entice Adivasis into the BJP’s social coalition under the Hindutva umbrella, while also burying the Adivasi groups’ issues of socio-economic justice.

The BJP has earlier shown in Uttar Pradesh how it could sideline the socio-economic concerns of non-Jatav Dalits and foreground the question of their political representation while integrating them into the Hindutva fold. In fact, soon after Banswara, Modi pitched Dalits against Muslims in a similar fashion in Rajasthan’s Tonk-Sawai Madhopur where he accused the Congress of trying to reduce the SC/ST quota to give reservation to Muslims – again, a half-truth, but then that’s not the point.

In Banswara, Modi challenged the very idea of equitable distribution of wealth in India that the Adivasi groups have been vigorously raising across the country. Until now, the BJP had mostly used its anti-conversion campaign against evangelist Christians in tribal-dominated pockets. The Prime Minister’s speech in Banswara marked a new chapter in his outreach towards the Adivasis.

While he demonised Muslims as “infiltrators” and the Congress as a party with an “urban Naxal” and “Maoist” mindset, he effectively laid the ground for marginalised groups like Dalits and Adivasis to set aside their rights to jal, jangal, and zameen, surrender their advocacy of fair distribution of wealth and instead fight another disenfranchised group – all in the aid of the Sangh parivar’s vision of a Hindu rashtra.

This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.

Modi’s Islamophobic Speech Shows Despite Tall Claims, BJP Is Jittery About 2024

In Banswara, where the prime minister delivered the speech on Sunday, the Congress has extended its support to the Bharat Adivasi Party, which is drawing huge crowds in support of its candidate and incumbent MLA from Chorasi, Rajkumar Roat.

The outrage over Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s blatantly Islamophobic speech in Rajasthan, wherein he cautioned the public that if Congress comes to power, ‘it will distribute wealth to those with more children’ is rightly expected to not die down anytime soon.

Even as the prime minister weaved his narrative around the claim of a statement made by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh – the claim has been proven incorrect as Singh’s words were misconstrued – and used it to imply that Congress is a party that favours Muslims, this blatant dog whistling did betray the desperateness of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), just after the first phase of the Lok Sabha elections concluded.

Illustration: Pariplab Chakraborty

The speech in question was delivered at the meeting of the National Development Council by Singh on December 9, 2006. He had said resources must be allocated to uplift people from the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes communities, backward classes, minorities, women, and children. He said that India needs to plan the development of minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, in a manner that they are “empowered to share equitably the fruits of development”.

“Agriculture, irrigation and water resources, health, education, critical investment in rural infrastructure, and the essential public investment needs of general infrastructure, along with programmes for the upliftment of SC/STs, other backward classes, minorities and women and children. The component plans for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes will need to be revitalized. We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources. The Centre has a myriad other responsibilities whose demands will have to be fitted within the over-all resource availability [sic],” reads the transcript of Manmohan Singh’s speech in the government archive.

The Model Code of Conduct mandates that no party or candidate shall indulge in any activity which may aggravate existing differences or create mutual hatred or cause tension between different castes and communities, religious or linguistic.

There shall be no appeal to caste or communal feelings for securing votes. Mosques, churches, temples or other places of worship shall not be used as a forum for election propaganda.

Further, according to Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: “Appeals by a candidate, or any other person with the consent of a candidate, to vote or refrain from voting on the ground of his religion, race, caste, community or language is a corrupt electoral practice. Section 123(3A) denounces any attempt by a candidate to promote feelings of enmity or hatred among citizens on these grounds during elections. Anyone found guilty of corrupt electoral practice can be debarred from contesting elections for a maximum period of up to six years.”

Modi blatantly violated this code and the RPA, 1951 during his election meeting on April 22 at Banswara in the state of Rajasthan, aiming at not only appealing to ‘communal feelings’ but also instigating and aggravating hatred in the Hindus against Muslims.

Why would Modi, whose party has set a target of 400 seats in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, try so hard to demonise the Congress by taking an openly anti-Muslim stance that would seem brazen even by the deplorable standards of his own partymen speaking?

At this point of time, when the BJP has repeatedly mocked the Congress and the INDIA alliance, and appeared confident of a third term for Modi, even a cautionary approach suggesting what would happen if Congress comes to power stands out as odd.

Modi opting for a hardline Hindutva-laden rhetoric and not shying away from publicly naming the Muslim community before talking about ‘those with more wealth’ coincides with the fact that the speech came at a time when in states such as Rajasthan, the voter turnout of the first phase of the Lok Sabha elections has decreased when compared to the same figure for the 2019 Indian general elections.

For example, Rajasthan recorded around 58% voter turnout on April 19, the day when the first phase for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections were concluded in the state. Back in 2019, when the BJP had won all 25 seats in the state, this figure was much higher, with a voter turnout of 63.71%.

Is the comparatively smaller voter turnout a sign of worry for the BJP? If the answer is in the negative, and the BJP was sure of a walk over, then we would not have been seeing the BJP repeatedly trying to set the election’s agenda around Hindutva, a culmination of which was Modi’s speech.

While noting the fact that Modi had to resort to such divisive words, it cannot be discounted that in many constituencies, the electoral contest between the BJP and Congress is no longer as one-sided as it was in 2019.

Take the case of Banswara, where Modi delivered the speech on Sunday. In Banswara, the Congress has extended its support to the Bharat Adivasi Party (BAP), which is drawing huge crowds in support of its candidate and incumbent MLA from Chorasi, Rajkumar Roat.

While the BJP is relying on Congress’s turncoat leader Mahendrajeet Singh Malviya, the public support in favour of Roat cannot be ignored.

In a different era, the Election Commission would have taken note of the controversial parts violating the MCC in Modi’s speech, which are missing from the long summary of Modi’s election speech uploaded in English in his personal website.

But a day later, the EC declined to comment on the incident.

While the Congress, reeling from the freezing of its bank accounts, ED raids and leaders jumping ship, has managed to bring out a progressive election manifesto, it is open to criticism from the ruling BJP, its political arch rival.

But the concocted manner in which Modi gave a communal spin to his speech, even going to the extent of saying that it will redistribute the wealth of women after taking stock of the gold they have, reflects the desperation of the BJP to eke polarisation to its last drop.

Modi’s tenure will be remembered for overseeing the unprecedented sale and mortgage of gold jewellery owned by Indian women citizens.

As Congress leader Jairam Ramesh pointed out recently, economic disasters like demonetisation, a badly-designed GST, and the Modi government’s unplanned lockdown, along with poor COVID relief packages, have pushed India’s households into the highest levels of debt (40% of GDP). Net savings are at their lowest level ever (5% of GDP). Families have been forced to sell their gold or take loans by pledging their gold as collateral – a state of distress and desperation.

Recall that just during the pandemic alone, due to the Modi Sarkar’s complete incompetence, negligence, and mismanagement, India’s women had to give up over Rs. 60,000 crore worth of gold as collateral. Their gold was auctioned off by lenders and banks in full-page ads,” Ramesh continued. This wasn’t just negligence; it was a betrayal.

Akhil Chaudhary is a human rights lawyer based in Rajasthan. He posts on X @akhilchaudhary.

Modi’s Hate Speech: PUCL, Rajasthan Election Watch Approach Poll Authorities to Seek Action

Several concerned citizens and civil society organisations have been urging the Election Commission to crack a whip against Modi and BJP leaders for making speeches with communal overtones. The EC is yet to respond.

New Delhi: Civil society organisations Rajasthan Election Watch (REW) and People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) have called on the chief election officer (CEO) of Rajasthan to lodge a complaint against Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his recent anti-Muslim hate speech in Banswara.

According to Kavita Srivastava of PUCL, she and Mukesh Goswami of REW approached the CEO Rajasthan to lodge their complaint on Monday, April 22. They got a “receiving signature” on their complaint (application) from the officer on special duty (OSD) to the CEO Rajasthan. Srivastava said they were asked to come back the next day, Tuesday, to know the status of their application. It should be noted that the complaint is yet to be accepted to result in any further action.

Separately, Srivastava and Bhanwar Meghwanshi of PUCL approached Jaipur Police Commissioner, Biju George Joseph, for the registration of a first information report (FIR) against Modi and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders in connection with the hate speech.

Srivastava said the Commissioner refused to register an FIR, noting that no police station in Jaipur had the jurisdiction to do so. At this point, Srivastava and Meghwanshi pointed out to the Commissioner that there was no need for jurisdiction for offences committed under Sections 124 (B), 153 (A), 295 (A) and 505 of the Indian Penal Code. He was still unconvinced and refused to file a zero FIR. However, he forwarded their complaint to the Banswara SP.

Separately, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) approached the Mandir Marg Police Station in Delhi to lodge a complaint against Modi. However, the police there refused to accept their complaint. It was then CPI (M) leaders Brinda Karat and Pushpinder Singh Grewal forwarded their complaint to the Delhi Police Commissioner.

Modi on Sunday, April 21, during his campaign in Rajasthan’s Banswara, had said, “Earlier, when his government was in power, he had said that Muslims have the first right on the country’s property, which means who will they collect this property and distribute it to – those who have more children, will distribute it to the infiltrators. Will the money of your hard work be given to the infiltrators? Do you approve of this?”

He also went on to say, “This Congress manifesto is saying that they will calculate the gold of the mothers and sisters, get information about it and then distribute it. Manmohan Singh’s government had said that Muslims have the first right on property. Brothers and sisters, these urban Naxal thoughts will not let even your mangalsutra escape, they will go this far.”

Rogue Candidates, Leaders Refusing to Honour INDIA Ties Add to Congress’s Rajasthan Woes

The multiple flip flops come at a time when the Congress along with other parties in the INDIA alliance are hoping to prevent the BJP from winning all 25 Lok Sabha seats in Rajasthan.

Jaipur: A candidate designated by the grand old party for the Lok Sabha election bows out of the race, another leader goes incommunicado and switches off his phone, refusing to withdraw his nomination even after directions from the Congress high command – a bizarre string of events are playing out in the Congress party in Rajasthan before the Lok Sabha elections.

The multiple flip flops come at a time when the Congress along with other parties in the INDIA alliance are hoping to prevent the BJP from winning all 25 Lok Sabha seats in Rajasthan, a feat that the saffron party and its allies have repeated two consecutive times in the last one decade.

The latest incident in the sequence is from southern Rajasthan’s Banswara Lok Sabha seat, where the Congress party’s symbol is all set to be listed in EVMs on voting day, despite the fact that the party has officially pledged support to the Bharat Adivasi Party (BAP) candidate from the seat as part of the understanding within the INDIA alliance.

Back and forth on alliance with BAP, and a ‘rogue’ candidate

While the Congress had announced its candidates on most of the Lok Sabha seats in Rajasthan, it had refrained from announcing a name from the Banswara parliamentary seat, where the BJP has nominated local strongman Mahendrajeet Singh Malviya, who had recently quit Congress to join the saffron party.

After sensing the wave of support in the constituency for the Bharat Adivasi Party (BAP), a section of Congress leaders including Rajasthan in-charge Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa were in favour of an alliance with the party, which at present has three MLAs in the 200-member Rajasthan assembly.

The BAP has announced Chorasi MLA Rajkumar Roat from Banswara. Since his candidature was announced, Roat has been pulling massive crowds.

However, local Congress MLAs were dead set against any alliance with the BAP, with Congress legislators such as Ganesh Ghogra opposing any plans of a tie up with the Adivasi party.

After much dilly dally, on April 4, which was the last day of the nomination process, the Congress had announced the name of its senior leader and former minister Arjun Singh Bamaniya from the Banswara Lok Sabha seat.

From left Arjun Singh Bamaniya, Arvind Damor and Rajkumar Roat.

But surprisingly, Bamaniya did not file his nomination papers and instead it was local Congress leader Arvind Damor, who filed his nomination as the Congress candidate from Banswara.

In another development, on April 7, Congress’s Rajasthan in-charge Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa announced on X that the Congress is extending its support to the BAP candidates for the Banswara parliamentary constituency in upcoming Lok Sabha elections and in the Bagidora assembly constituency by-elections.

“Safeguarding India’s constitution and its democracy is our primary objective,” said Randhawa.

But soon after declaring its support for the BAP, Congress faced a peculiar problem. Arvind Damor, the young Congress leader who had filed his nomination under the party symbol for the Banswara Lok Sabha elections, went incommunicado and refused to withdraw his candidature.

Damor later asked reporters if the Congress wanted him to withdraw the form, why was he asked by Bamaniya to file it in the first place, adding that he will fight the elections for the local youth subscribing to the Congress’s ideology.

As a result, after the time to withdraw nominations passed, the Congress now has a candidate contesting the Banswara Lok Sabha elections on its party symbol, despite the grand old party lending support to the BAP. Congress has subsequently expelled Damor for a period of six years but he remains a candidate who will contest the elections from Banswara on the hand symbol.

Flip-flop over tickets in Rajsamand, Jaipur

The incident in Banswara was not the first such instance before the Lok Sabha elections when the Congress was in for a shock, with its leaders defying the party.

Last month, the Congress announced the name of Sudarshan Singh Rawat, its former MLA from Bheem seat, as its candidate for the Rajsamand parliamentary constituency.

But even long after announcing his candidature, the Congress couldn’t contact Rawat, who later wrote a letter to Congress president Govind Singh Dotasra saying that he had earlier communicated his desire to not contest the elections.

As a result of Rawat’s refusal, the Congress had to shift Damodar Gurjar, its candidate from Bhilwara to neighbouring Rajsamand while senior Congress leader CP Joshi had to be fielded from Bhilawara.

Earlier, the Congress had also changed its Jaipur candidate Sunil Sharma and replaced him with Pratap Singh Khachariyawas, after a public uproar ensued over Sharma’s alleged association with Jaipur Dialogues, a right-wing platform which routinely criticises Congress and its leaders.

While Sharma maintained that he had no association with Jaipur Dialogues and its social media channels, even Congress leaders such as Shashi Tharoor had expressed their surprise over the move.

After severe backlash, Sharma withdrew his candidature and Khachariyawas’s name was announced as his replacement from the Jaipur Lok Sabha seat.

A similar incident was also seen in Nagaur, where the Congress has allied with the Hanuman Beniwal-led Rashtriya Loktantrik Party (RLP). During a recent speech, Beniwal, who is the INDIA alliance’s candidate from Nagaur said that some Congress leaders are openly campaigning for the BJP.

After Beniwal’s comments, the Congress suspended some of its leaders from Nagaur, including Tejpal Mirdha, who had unsuccessfully contested the 2023 Assembly elections against Beniwal on a Congress ticket.

BJP says Congress’s house not in order, Congress cites actions against dissidents

The BJP has slammed the Congress over the series of flip flops in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections, accusing the party of not finding enough candidates to contest the parliamentary elections.

“These days people know that one cannot win elections on a Congress ticket. As a result there is panic within the Congress as leaders are repeatedly saying they didn’t want to contest elections but are made to contest in the party. The public is with Modi ji. A party, which till a few months back was in power in Rajasthan, is struggling to find 25 candidates to contest. As a result it is tying up with other parties such as CPM and RLP, in areas including the backyard of the state Congress president. It shows that the BJP will once again win,” Rajasthan BJP Spokesperson Laxmikant Bhardwaj told The Wire.

The Congress hit back, citing action taken against its dissident leaders and attacking BJP over accusations of infighting within the saffron party.

“The Congress is contesting the elections with full strength. We have already taken action against those Congress leaders who were working against the party, be it in Nagaur or Banswara. The BJP is riddled with infighting. One can see that in the absence of senior BJP leaders such as former chief minister Vasundhara Raje. BJP leaders are not citing their work but are asking for votes in the name of the Prime Minister. It won’t work this time as the public will vote for Congress,” said Rajasthan Congress general secretary and spokesperson Swarnim Chaturvedi.