New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to examine the validity of the law making the practice of instant divorce through triple talaq among Muslims a punishable offence entailing imprisonment of up to three years.
A bench of justices N.V. Ramana and Ajay Rastogi issued a notice to the Centre on a batch of petitions which has sought to declare the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019 as “unconstitutional” on grounds that it allegedly violates the provisions of the Constitution.
“We will examine this,” the bench told senior advocate Salman Khurshid, who was appearing for one of the petitioners.
Khurshid told the bench that there were many dimensions, including making the practice a punishable offence and jail term of up to three years, which were required to be examined by the top court.
Khurshid told the bench that the petitioners were concerned about making the practice of triple talaq among Muslims an offence as the apex court had already declared it to be null and void.
“If there is no such thing as triple talaq, then what are they making an offence?” he told the bench and referred to a five-judge constitution bench verdict which had declared the practice of triple talaq among Muslims as null and void.
Also Read: Watch | Here’s Why the Triple Talaq Bill Does Nothing for the Rights of Women
The bench asked if a religious practice is declared as null and void and an offence – like dowry and child marriages – but continues to be followed, what could the remedy be.
Responding to the query, Khurshid said several aspects have to be examined and in the triple talaq matter, the constitution bench had already said the practice is void.
He said it has to be examined whether the religious practice denies the rights of a woman.
The bench, while agreeing to examine the validity of the 2019 Act, observed that petitioners have also raised the issue of punishment of up to three years and grant of bail to the husband only after the woman is heard by the court.
A total of four petitions have been filed in the apex court challenging the validity of the law.