Prominent Citizens Urge SC to Reconsider Contempt Proceedings Against Prashant Bhushan

“An institution as important as the Supreme Court of a country must be open to public discussion without the fear of retribution or action of criminal contempt,” a statement released by 131 signatories said.

New Delhi: Several prominent citizens including former judges have expressed solidarity with Prashant Bhushan, saying the contempt proceedings initiated against him by the Supreme Court appears to be an “attempt at stifling” criticism of the court, not just by the advocate but by all “stakeholders in the Indian democratic and constitutional setup”.

The signatories ‒ including Justices Madan B. Lokur and A.P. Shah, Admiral (retd) Ramdas, author Arundhati Roy and 127 others ‒ have said that in the interest of justice and fairness and to “maintain the dignity of the Supreme Court”, the top court must reconsider the decision to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings against Bhushan.

Describing him as a “relentless crusader for the rights of the weakest sections of our society”, the signatories said that Bhushan has spent his career in pro bono legal service to those who do not have ready access to justice.

Also Read: Eight Highlights of Petition Seeking Contempt Action Against Prashant Bhushan, Twitter

The signatories highlighted the fact that Chief Justice of India (CJI) S.A. Bobde’s elder brother, senior advocate Vinod A. Bobde, had stated that there cannot be a “situation where citizens live in fear of the Court’s arbitrary power to punish for contempt for words of criticism on the conduct of judges, in or out of court”.

“In the past few years, serious questions have been raised about the reluctance of the Supreme Court to play its constitutionally mandated role as a check on governmental excesses and violations of fundamental rights of people by the state. These questions have been raised by all sections of society- media, academics, civil society organisations, members of the legal fraternity and even by sitting and retired judges of the Supreme Court itself,” the statement says.

Saying the Supreme Court’s reluctance to intervene in the recent migrant crisis during the lockdown came under intense public scrutiny, concerns have also been raised regarding the decision of the court to not restart physical hearings, the signatories said.

These comments must be read in the context of the tweets by Bhushan for which he is facing contempt proceedings.

In one of the tweets, made on June 27, Bhushan claimed that the “role of the Supreme Court” in the “destruction of democracy” and “role of the last 4 CJIs” must be examined. The second tweet, made on June 29, the advocate commented on CJI Bobde’s photo on an expensive bike. He questioned the CJI for being seen without a helmet or face mask while keeping the SC in “lockdown mode”.

Also Read: In Contempt Proceedings Against Prashant Bhushan, SC Faces a Hurdle – Maintainability

The signatories said that the Supreme Court should take note of these concerns and engage with the public in an open and transparent manner. “An institution as important as the Supreme Court of a country must be open to public discussion without the fear of retribution or action of criminal contempt. Indeed, criminal contempt as an offence has been circumscribed and made redundant in most functioning democracies, such as the USA and the UK,” they said.

Even in India, the principle that criticism of the judiciary should not be stifled by the indiscriminate use of the power of contempt has been recognised by the Supreme Court. They also highlighted Vinod A. Bobde’s words:

“We cannot countenance a situation where citizens live in fear of the Court’s arbitrary power to punish for contempt for words of criticism on the conduct of judges, in or out of court.”

The full statement has been reproduced below, with the full list of signatories.

§

Statement in solidarity with Mr. Prashant Bhushan on the initiation of Criminal Contempt Proceedings against him

We the undersigned citizens of the country, express our concern with the initiation of contempt proceedings against human right activist and advocate, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, by the Supreme Court of India, in respect of two of his tweets. Mr. Bhushan has been a relentless crusader for the rights of the weakest sections of our society and has spent his career in pro bono legal service to those who do not have ready access to justice. He has fought cases at the Apex Court on issues ranging from environmental protection, human rights, civil liberties, corruption in high places and has been an outspoken champion for judicial accountability and reforms, especially in the higher judiciary.

In the past few years, serious questions have been raised about the reluctance of the Supreme Court to play its constitutionally mandated role as a check on governmental excesses and violations of fundamental rights of people by the state. These questions have been raised by all sections of society- media, academics, civil society organisations, members of the legal fraternity and even by sitting and retired judges of the Supreme Court itself. Most recently, the Supreme Court’s reluctance to intervene in a timely manner to avert the migrant crisis during the lockdown came under intense public scrutiny. Concerns have also been raised regarding the decision of the court to not restart physical hearings, even in a limited manner, despite passage of five months since the onset of the COVID pandemic.

We urge the Hon’ble judges of the Supreme Court to take note of these concerns and engage with the public in an open and transparent manner. The initiation of contempt proceedings against Mr. Bhushan who had articulated some of  these concerns in his tweets, appears to be an attempt at stifling such criticism, not just by Prashant Bhushan but by all stakeholders in the Indian democratic and constitutional setup. We believe the institution must address these genuine concerns.

An institution as important as the Supreme Court of a country must be open to public discussion without the fear of retribution or action of criminal contempt. Indeed, criminal contempt as an offence has been circumscribed and made redundant in most functioning democracies, such as the USA and the UK. In the landmark U.S. Supreme Court judgement in New York Times v. L.B. Sullivan 11 L’ed (2nd) 686,  with respect to contempt of court and the freedom of speech and expression it was held: “Injury to official reputation affords no more warrant for repressing speech that would otherwise be free than does factual error. Where judicial officers are involved, this Court has held that concern for the dignity and reputation of the courts does not justify the punishment as criminal contempt of criticism of the judge or his decision. This is true even though the utterance contains “half-truth” and misinformation”.

Even in India, the principle that criticism of the judiciary should not be stifled by the indiscriminate use of the power of contempt has been recognized by the Supreme Court as well as by academics and advocates of repute, such as the late Senior Advocate Shri Vinod A. Bobde who had stated [“Scandals and Scandalising”, (2003) 8 SCC Jour 32], “We cannot countenance a situation where citizens live in fear of the Court’s arbitrary power to punish for contempt for words of criticism on the conduct of judges, in or out of court.”

Therefore in the interest of  justice and fairness and to maintain the dignity of the Supreme Court of India, we urge the Court to reconsider its decision to initiate suo-moto contempt proceedings against Mr. Prashant Bhushan and to withdraw the same at the earliest.
Endorsed by:

  1. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Former judge of the Supreme Court of India
  2. Justice AP Shah, Former Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court
  3. A. Selvaraj, IRS (Retd.), Former Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Chennai, GoI
  4. Aakar Patel
  5. Achin Vanaik, writer and social activist, former professor at the University of Delhi
  6. Admiral Ramdas, Former Chief of Naval Staff
  7. Ajit Ranade, economist
  8. Alok Perti, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Coal, GoI
  9. Aloke B. Lal, IPS (Retd.), Former Director General (Prosecution), Govt. of Uttarakhand
  10. Amit Bhaduri, former Professor Emeritus at Jawaharlal Nehru University
  11. Amit Singh Chadha, Senior advocate
  12. Amitabha Pande, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Inter-State Council, GoI
  13. Anand Grover, Senior advocate
  14. Anjali Bhardwaj, Social activist
  15. Annie Namala, Social activist
  16. Annie Raja, NFIW
  17. Ardhendu Sen, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  18. Aruna Roy, Social activist
  19. Arundhati Dhuru, NAPM
  20. Arundhati Roy, Author
  21. Ashok Khosla, environmentalist
  22. Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFoS (Retd.), Former MD, State Forest Development Corporation, Govt. of Gujarat
  23. Ashok Kumar Sharma, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Finland and Estonia
  24. Bezwada Wilson, Safai Karamchari Andolan
  25. Bobby Ramakant, Socialist Party (India)
  26. Brinda Karat, CPI(M)
  27. C. U. Singh, senior advocate
  28. Chandrashekhar Balakrishnan, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Coal, GoI
  29. D. Raja, General Secretary CPI
  30. Deb Mukharji, IFS (Retd.), Former High Commissioner to Bangladesh and former Ambassador to Nepal
  31. Deepak Nayyar, Emeritus Professor of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
  32. Devika Singh, Social Activist
  33. Dipa Sinha, Right to Food Campaign
  34. Dr Dharamvira Gandhi,, Punjab Manch and former Lok Sabha member from Patiala
  35. EAS Sarma, Former Secretary to GOI
  36. Enakshi Ganguly, Co- Founder and Advisor, HAQ Centre for Child Rights
  37. Fabian K.P,
  38. Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ, human rights activist
  39. G. Balachandhran, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  40. G.G. Parikh, Freedom Fighter
  41. Ganesh Devy, National President, Rashtra Seva Dal
  42. Gopal Shankarnarayan, senior advocate
  43. Gopalan Balagopal, IAS (Retd.), Former Special Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  44. Harsh Mander, social activst
  45. Henri Tiphagne, Executive Director, People’s Watch and National Working Secretary, Human Rights Defenders’ Alert – India ( HRDA)
  46. Hindal Tyabji, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary rank, Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir
  47. Indira Jaising, senior advocate
  48. Jagdeep Chhokar, former Professor, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
  49. Javed Anand, Journalist and civil rights activist
  50. Jayati Ghosh, Professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
  51. Jean Dreze, Economist
  52. Julio Ribeiro, IPS (Retd.), Former Adviser to Governor of Punjab & former Ambassador to Romania
  53. K. John Koshy, IAS (Retd.), Former State Chief Information Commissioner, West Bengal
  54. K. Saleem Ali, IPS (Retd.), Former Special Director, CBI, GoI
  55. Kalyani Chaudhuri, IAS (Retd.), Former Additional Chief Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
  56. Kamal Jaswal, Former Secretary to Govt of India, Department of Information Technology
  57. Kamayani Swami, NAPM, Bihar
  58. Kamla Bhasin, Social Activist
  59. Kavita Krishnan, AIPWA
  60. Kavitha Kuruganti, social activist
  61. Lalita Ramdas, Peace, Human Rights anti-nuclear Activist
  62. Lubna Sarwath, Socialist Party (India)
  63. M.G. Devasahayam, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Govt. of Haryana
  64. M.Y. Rao, IAS (Retd.)
  65. Madhu Bhaduri, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Portugal
  66. Mahadev Vidrohi, President, Sarva Seva Sangh
  67. Manoj Mitta, Author & Journalist
  68. Martin Macwan, Dalit human rights activist
  69. Medha Patkar, Social activist
  70. Meena Gupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests, GoI
  71. Meera Sanghamitra, Member, National Convening Committee, NAPM
  72. Mihir Desai, Senior advocate
  73. Mrinal Pande, Journalist and author
  74. N. Ram, former Editor-in-Chief, The Hindu
  75. N.C. Saxena, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Planning Commission, GoI
  76. Nagalsamy, IA&AS (Retd.), Former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala
  77. Najeeb Jung, IAS (Retd.), Former Lieutenant Governor, Delhi
  78. Navrekha Sharma, IFS (Retd.), Former Ambassador to Indonesia
  79. Neeraj Jain, Lokayat, Associate Editor, Janata
  80. Nikhil Dey, Social activist
  81. Noor Mohammad, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, National Disaster Management Authority, GoI
  82. P. Sainath, Journalist and author
  83. P.K. Lahiri, IAS (Retd.), Former Executive Director, Asian Development Bank
  84. P.R. Dasgupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, Food Corporation of India, GoI
  85. Pamela Philipose, Journalist
  86. Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Author & journalist
  87. Paul Divakar, National Campaign on Dalit Human Rights
  88. Prabhat Patnaik, Emeritus professor, Jawaharlal Nehru University
  89. Prabir Purkayastha
  90. Pradeep K. Deb, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Deptt. Of Sports, GoI
  91. Pradeep Nandrajog, Senior advocate
  92. Prakash Singh, former Police Chief, DG BSF,DGP UP & DGP Assam
  93. Pranab S. Mukhopadhyay, IAS (Retd.), Former Director, Institute of Port Management, GoI
  94. Prof. Alok Rai, Allahabad
  95. Prof. Manoj Kumar Jha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha
  96. R. Poornalingam, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, GoI
  97. Rahul Khullar, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
  98. Rajeev Bhargava, Professor, CSDS, Delhi
  99. Rajmohan Gandhi, Historian and Professor
  100. Rajni Bakshi, Journalist and author
  101. Raju Sharma, IAS (Retd.), Former Member, Board of Revenue, Govt. of UP
  102. Ramachandra Guha, Historian and writer
  103. Ravi Chopra, People’s Science Institute
  104. Ravi Vira Gupta, IAS (Retd.), Former Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India
  105. Reetika Khera, economist
  106. S.R. Hiremath, Founder President, Samaj Parivartana Samudaya (SPS), Dharwad
  107. Sandeep Pandey, Socialist Party (India)
  108. Sanjay Bhasin
  109. Sanjay Hegde, Senior advocate
  110. Satish Deshpande, Professor of Sociology, Delhi University
  111. Sevanti Ninan, Journalist and researcher
  112. Shafi Alam, IPS (Retd.), Former Director General, NCRB, GoI
  113. Shailesh Gandhi, Former Information Commissioner of CIC
  114. Shantha Sinha, Former Chairperson NCPCR
  115. Sharad Behar, IAS (Retd.), Former Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh
  116. Sonalini Mirchandani, IFS (Resigned), GoI
  117. Subhasis Bandyopadhyay, IIEST, Shibpur
  118. Subodh Lal, IPoS (Resigned), Former Deputy Director General, Ministry of  Communications, GoI
  119. Sundar Burra, IAS (Retd.), Former Secretary, Govt. of Maharashtra
  120. Surabhi Agarwal, Socialist Party (India)
  121. Suresh K. Goel, IFS (Retd.), Former Director General, ICCR, GoI
  122. Syeda Hameed, Former member, Planning Commission
  123. Teesta Setalvad, Civil rights activist
  124. V.P. Raja, IAS (Retd.), Former Chairman, MERC
  125. Vandana Shiva, Scientist, RFSTE
  126. Vijaya Latha Reddy, IFS (Retd.), Former Deputy National Security Adviser, GoI
  127. Vipul Mudgal, Activist and media scholar
  128. Vivek Mukherjee, Assistant Professor & Faculty Coordinator, NALSAR
  129. Vrinda Grover, Advocate
  130. Wajahat Habibullah, Former Chief Information Commissioner of CIC
  131. Yogendra Yadav, Swaraj India

Note: The late Vinod A. Bobde was the elder brother of Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde, and not his father as was incorrectly stated in an initial version of this story