Sometime towards the closing decades of the last century, the urban crept in upon us. The city had not entirely been invisible before – merely lurking in the shadows of the nation which imagined villages as ethically more desirable spaces of habitation. Dr Ambedkar’s writings were a possible exception, though even in these, critiques of village life and caste structure are more discernible than musings on forms of the urban.
It is only more recently that the city has begun to emerge fully, as an object of enquiry – experienced through novels and films, analysed by academics and shaped by policy. This is also the promise of Urban Parallax, a wonderful collection of essays that sheds scholarly light on the world of urban policy – evaluating policy discourse through parallel reflections on the trajectories of India’s urban transformation.
Edited by Amita Bhide and Himanshu Burte
Urban Parallax
Yoda Press, 2018
Much of urban policy that has emerged in recent decades is driven by the twin ideas of cities as the locus of economic growth and of India as a rapidly urbanising country – the appropriate trajectory of which must be guided by policy. Not surprisingly, therefore, that Urban Parallax also opens with essays by some of India’s leading urban economists offering differing perspectives on these issues.
For Abhay Pethe, Vaidehi Tandel and Sahil Gandhi, India is possibly already urban to the extent of 50% or more, rather than the official 31%. Om Prakash Mathur, on the other hand, notes a duality – of unprecedented growth in the scale of urbanisation, the speed of which nevertheless remains slow. All the authors are persuaded, though, that the greater extent of such growth is geographical – through the mutation of rural settlements into census towns – rather than through the migration of people from villages to cities.
As Partha Mukhopadhyay puts it: what seems to have happened is the morphing of places rather than the moving of people. Pethe et. al. suggest better policy design and capacity building in response. Malini Krishnankutty suggests greater integration of economic policy and spatial planning, while Mukhopadhyay pushes the envelope further, adding a normative dimension to the capacity question – “Is the question just about whether cities are engines? Should it also not be about the journey we want the engine to take us on?”
This is a strain of thought that informs several other essays.
Gautam Bhan draws upon Caldeira’s writings on Brazil to underline the auto-constructed nature of Indian cities and the different shades of legality that inhere in them. He suggests that ‘housing’, especially for the poorest, is a not one-off ownership of a material artefact, but is instead realised over generations, through the pulls and pressures of wages, rents and personal circumstances. Thus, the appropriateness of a housing policy cannot lie in its own assumptions and effectiveness but is to be evaluated by the extent to which these ground realities form the ‘common-sense’ of policy discourse.
Darshini Mahadevia offers a four-fold division of Indian cities – of the very rich, the upper middle class, the lower middle class and the urban poor – to raise doubts about whether the emphasis on ‘smartness’ and world-class amenities that feature prominently in contemporary urban policies can equally serve all.
Also read: Addressing the Silence Around Delhi’s Sound Pollution
Anant Maringanti addresses the question more obliquely, drawing our attention to how different localities in Hyderabad are variously inserted in global economic circuits, especially those related to the IT industry, which has implications for the extent to which a uniform, standardised urban package can provide an effective response. These lines of arguments would not be entirely unfamiliar to those who follow the urban literature closely.
However, fresh insights are on offer too, as several authors relate these differently situated urban spaces to the ‘local’ of policy domain through a granular description of the political. Himanshu Burte offers a conceptual argument about how the relationship between past and the present may be drawn, both within policy and in our understandings of urban processes. Lalitha Kamath draws attention to the ‘tribal’ governance culture of Mizoram that leads to the municipal council acquiring a hybrid and distinctive character in Aizawl, while Bhide counters the ‘Delhi-centred’ narrative of policy through a close reading of the slum policies initiated in Bombay through municipal and state-level agencies.
The point is not simply to understand the local as the place where central policy measures are translated to a greater or lesser degree of effectiveness but, as Bhide writes, to imagine the local itself as space where policy options may be conceived.
On all these counts – the significance of local policy spaces; the need to understand policy in conjunction with urban processes; developing sensitivity to the unevenness of the urban and in asking normative questions about the direction in which policy ought to guide Indian urbanism – the book has much to recommend for itself.
Also read: The Delhi Development Authority Demonstrates How to Kill a Forest
However, there remain two critical aspects to be addressed by future scholarship. The first is the role of other institutions in shaping urban outcomes. To state the most obvious – the increasing role of the judiciary in shaping urban discourse and policy options, which goes unaddressed in this collection. The second is the question of scale. The editors and several authors display their sensitivity to this question, but for the most part, conflate the urban with the city or the metropolitan, with the exception of an essay by M. Vijayabaskar and Radha Varadarajan on peri-urban spaces.
If one considers that cities draw upon water, food and energy from much wider geographies, while expelling waste to other spaces – on landfills, into rivers and seas – it is imperative to consider the urban even at sites that are not necessarily cities. Given global warming and climate change, a rethink of the urban from an environmental perspective is critical, even as we continue to engage with it as from the perspective of society and economy.
Awadhendra Sharan trained as a historian at Delhi University and subsequently at the University of Chicago. His current research is focused on economies and cultures of waste and pollution in colonial India. In addition, he has initiated a new research project on Urban Infrastructure in India.