Washington: With congressional elections a week away, President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he will seek to scrap the right of citizenship for US-born children of non-citizens and undocumented immigrants as he tries again to dramatically reshape immigration policies.
Reviving his support for a legally questionable theory, Trump told the Axios news website he would issue an executive order on so-called birthright citizenship, an issue that has long rankled some conservative Republicans.
Trump’s previous calls to end the practice have resonated with his political base, but moderate Republicans and some legal experts say Trump is running afoul of the US Constitution.
Also Read: Trump Administration Plans Major Changes for H-1B Visas
Under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, enacted in the wake of the Civil War to ensure that black Americans previously subject to slavery had full citizenship rights, citizenship is granted to “all persons born or naturalized in the US.”
It has been routinely interpreted over the years to confer citizenship to people born in the US whose parents are undocumented immigrants.
Trump, who has made rhetoric against undocumented immigrants a central plank of his presidency, originally spoke out against birthright citizenship when he first started running for president in 2015.
One Republican member of Congress, frequent Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham, said he would move to introduce legislation “along the same lines” as Trump‘s order.
Neither Graham nor Trump gave any details about the latest plan. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Other Republicans were critical. US House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan said Trump could not scrap the right with the stroke of a pen.
“You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order,” Ryan, the top Republican in Congress, said in an interview with radio station WVLK, the Washington Post reported.
In the run-up to the November 6 congressional elections, Trump has seized on a caravan of migrants from Central America who are trekking through Mexico toward the US, calling the migrants a threat. On Monday, the US said it would send over 5,200 troops to help secure the border with Mexico.
Also Read: Would-Be Immigrants Left in Legal Limbo After SCOTUS Travel Ban Order
Bill Kristol, editor at large of the conservative Weekly Standard and a Trump critic, said in a Twitter post: “The shrinking caravan of refugees isn’t a threat to the country or the constitutional order. A president who tries to end birthright citizenship by executive order is.”
The shrinking caravan of refugees isn’t a threat to the country or the constitutional order. A president who tries to end birthright citizenship by executive order is.
— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) October 30, 2018
Legal Argument
Trump, whose hard-line stance against undocumented immigration helped him win the White House, is emphasising his policy to drum up support for fellow Republicans in the elections as Americans are sharply divided and grappling with race and national identity.
Opinion polls show Democrats have a chance at achieving the net gain of 23 seats they need to win a majority in the House but they have a longer shot at the Senate, where they need a gain of two seats.
Democratic house leader Nancy Pelosi accused Trump of trying to distract attention from healthcare policy, which Democrats have identified as a top election issue.
“President Trump’s new claim he can unilaterally end the Constitution’s guarantee of citizenship shows Republicans’ spiralling desperation to distract from their assault on Medicare, Medicaid and people with pre-existing conditions,” Pelosi said in a statement.
The legal argument espoused by conservative activists for excluding children of undocumented immigrants would likely be based around the language in the 14th Amendment that says people born in the US are citizens if they are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the US.
Activists seeking to limit immigration, including Michael Anton, who wrote an article on the subject for the Washington Post in July, argue that undocumented immigrants are not under the jurisdiction of the US and therefore their children born on US soil should not be US citizens.
Most legal scholars say the jurisdiction language denies citizenship only to those who are not bound by US law, such as the children of foreign diplomats.
Ilya Shapiro, a lawyer with the libertarian Cato Institute, said that although there is a debate in academic circles among conservatives on whether Congress could legislate on the issue without running afoul of the 14th Amendment, “it’s not something that can be done by executive action alone.”
At least since 2005, Republicans in the US Congress have regularly offered legislation ending birthright citizenship for children born in the US if their parents were in the US without proper documents. But the legislation has never advanced, even when the House of Representatives or Senate was under Republican control.
Also Read: With the Rise of Borders at Home and Abroad, the Writing Is on the Wall
Vice president Mike Pence said the plan may not be unconstitutional, telling Politico in an interview that while “we all cherish” the 14th amendment, the US Supreme Court has not weighed in on the issue entirely.
“But the Supreme Court of the US has never ruled on whether or not the language of the 14th amendment, subject to the jurisdiction thereof, applies specifically to people who are in the country illegally,” Pence said.
The Supreme Court has not ruled specifically on the issue of whether undocumented immigrants can be denied birthright citizenship.
In 1898, however, in the case of a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants who lived permanently in the US, the court ruled that the government could not deny him citizenship.
Saikrishna Prakash, a conservative legal scholar at the University of Virginia, said Trump faces long legal odds to ending citizenship as a birthright.
“We’re a nation of immigrants so if I were to bet I would think the president is going to lose,” he said.
(Reuters)