Govt Approves Corbevax as Precautionary Dose for Adults Who Have Taken Covishield, Covaxin

This is the first time that a booster dose that is different from the one used for primary vaccination against COVID-19 has been allowed in the country.

New Delhi: The government has approved Biological E’s Corbevax as a precaution dose for those above 18 years fully vaccinated with either Covishield or Covaxin, official sources said on Wednesday.

This is the first time that a booster dose that is different from the one used for primary vaccination against Covid has been allowed in the country.

The sources told PTI that the Union Health Ministry’s approval is based on the recommendations made recently by the COVID-19 Working Group of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (NTAGI).

“Corbevax will be considered as a precaution dose after completion of six months or 26 weeks from the date of administration of the second dose of either Covaxin or Covishield vaccines for those aged above 18 years enabling use of Corbevax as a heterologous COVID-19 vaccine for precaution dose administration in this age group,” the sources said.

This will be in addition to the existing guidelines for homologous precaution dose administration of Covaxin and Covishield vaccine, the sources added.

All necessary changes in regard to the administration of precaution dose of Corbevax vaccine are being made on the Co-WIN portal.

India’s first indigenously developed RBD protein subunit vaccine Corbevax is currently being used to inoculate children in the age group of 12 to 14 years under the COVID-19 immunisation programme.

The COVID-19 Working Group (CWG), in its July 20 meeting, reviewed data of the double-blind randomised phase-3 clinical study which evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of booster dose of Corbevax vaccine when administered to COVID-19-negative adult volunteers of age 18-80 years previously vaccinated with two doses of either Covishield or Covaxin. `

“Following the examination of the data, the CWG observed that Corbevax vaccine can induce significant increase in antibody titers when given to those who have received either Covaxin or Covishield, which is likely to be protective as per the neutralisation data also,” the sources said.

The Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) on June 4 approved Corbevax as a precaution dose for those aged 18 and above.

India began administering precaution doses of vaccines to healthcare and frontline workers and those aged 60 and above with comorbidities from January 10.

The country began inoculating children aged 12-14 from March 16 and also removed the comorbidity clause making all people aged above 60 eligible for the precaution dose of Covid vaccine.

India on April 10 began administering precaution doses of COVID-19 vaccines to all aged above 18 years.

(PTI)

India’s Output, Exports of Russia’s Sputnik Vaccine at Risk Due to Ukraine Crisis

RDIF has deals with several Indian companies to make nearly one billion doses of Sputnik COVID-19 vaccines, though output has not risen beyond a few million doses.

New Delhi: India’s production and exports of Russia’s Sputnik COVID-19 vaccines are expected to slow further following US sanctions on Russia’s sovereign wealth fund that promotes the shot globally, three Indian pharmaceutical industry sources told Reuters.

The Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF) had billed India as one of Sputnik‘s biggest production hubs and markets, though local sales have stagnated at 1.2 million doses out of 1.8 billion doses of various vaccines administered in the country.

RDIF, which has said the US sanction this week could complicate its promotion of Sputnik shots, has deals with several Indian companies to make nearly one billion doses of it, though output has not risen beyond a few million doses.

RDIF’s main Indian distributor for Sputnik is Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and its manufacturing partners include Hetero and the Serum Institute of India (SII).

Another Indian company, which was to make more than 100 million Sputnik doses but had held off production due to a lack of demand in India, has now decided to not manufacture it at all, said a person with direct knowledge’s of the matter. The person declined to be named or identify the company.

Another source at an Indian company said Sputnik sales were likely to be slow in the near future.

RDIF and Hetero did not respond to requests for comment. The SII declined to comment.

Also Read: Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Bodes Good Business for Arms Manufacturers Worldwide

Dr. Reddy’s, one of India’s biggest drugmakers which has been selling its products in and around Russia for more than three decades, said it did not see any impact as Indian companies no longer import material from Russia to make Sputnik shots in India.

“We have manufacturing capabilities in India and drug substance is not imported. Hence there is no impact,” a spokesperson said in an email.

“Overall, we are monitoring evolving developments closely and preparing accordingly.”

Some four million Sputnik doses, bottled in India using imported material from Russia last year, were exported around October. Last month, India sent 135,875 locally made doses of the single-dose Sputnik Light vaccine to Uzbekistan, according to India’s foreign ministry.

(Reuters)

Delhi: Of 97 Who Died Due to COVID Between January 9-12, 70 Unvaccinated, 19 Took Only One Jab

“More than 75% of the people who died due to coronavirus had not even taken a single dose of the vaccine,” said health minister Satyendra Jain.

New Delhi: More than 75% of those who succumbed to the novel coronavirus infection in the current wave in Delhi were unvaccinated, health minister Satyendra Jain said on Friday.

He also said that the city is expected to record less than 25,000 coronavirus cases on Friday.

Delhi had on Thursday reported 28,867 COVID-19 cases, the sharpest single-day spike since the pandemic began, and 31 deaths, while the positivity rate surged to 29.21%, according to the health department data.

Delhi’s previous biggest daily jump of 28,395 cases was recorded on April 20 last year.

According to official data, of the 97 people who died due to COVID, between January 9 to January 12, 70 people were unvaccinated, while 19 had taken the first jab and eight were fully vaccinated. Besides seven were minors.

“More than 75% of the people who died due to coronavirus had not even taken a single dose of the vaccine. 90% of the people had severe comorbidities like cancer and kidney ailments. Even the seven patients below 18 years had chronic issues,” Jain noted.

He said one of the persons who died had allegedly attempted suicide and was hospitalised for it.

“He tested positive and died three days later,” said the minister.

The minister added that more than 13,000 hospital beds are available in the city.

“The hospitalisation rate has become stagnant and the daily admissions have reduced. It is a matter of great relief,” he said.

Out of 15,433 COVID beds in hospitals, 2,424 were occupied on Thursday, according to official data.

(PTI)

Australia Revokes Novak Djokovic’s Visa For a Second Time

The nine-time Australian Open champion could appeal the visa cancellation in court once again, as he successfully did after the first cancellation.

The Australian government on Friday cancelled Novak Djokovic’s visa for a second time, saying the Serbian tennis star may pose a risk to the community as he was unvaccinated for COVID-19.

Immigration minister Alex Hawke used his discretionary power to revoke Djokovic’s visa days after a court overturned an earlier cancellation of his visa and ordered his release from immigration detention in Melbourne.

“Today I exercised my power under section 133C(3) of the Migration Act to cancel the visa held by Mr Novak Djokovic on health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so,” the minister said in a statement.

The government “is firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic,” Hawke said.

Djokovic was first denied entry to Australia last week. He claims to have tested positive for COVID-19 on December 16 and therefore does not need a coronavirus vaccine to enter the country.

What does this mean for Djokovic?

The minister’s decision came a day after he was confirmed in the official draw for the Australian Open men’s tournament. The tournament is due to start on Monday.

The tennis world number one could now be deported from the country. If that happens, Djokovic would be banned from coming to Australia for three years, except in compelling circumstances that affect Australia’s interest.

The nine-time Australian Open champion could appeal the visa cancellation in court once again, as he successfully did after the first cancellation.

Also read: Australian Court Orders Tennis Player Novak Djokovic’s Release From Detention

More than just tennis

The case has led to polarised opinions that go beyond tennis, intensified debate over the rights of the unvaccinated.

When Djokovic announced his plans to travel to Australia with a medical exemption earlier this month, many in the country expressed anger and frustration.

Australia, and Melbourne in particular, has witnessed some of the strictest lockdowns over the last two years, in order to ward off the virus.

Critics not only targeted Djokovic for being unvaccinated, but also blamed the Australian government’s handling of the situation.

The controversy has even strained ties between Canberra and Belgrade.

Earlier this week, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and his Serbian counterpart Ana Brnabic had spoken one-on-one to discuss the situation.

In Australia and elsewhere, the controversy has divided opinions

This article was originally published on DW.

10 Questions the Indian Govt Must Answer About Vaccines for Minors and Boosters

Did the Indian government wait to change its policy on vaccinating teenagers until the drug regulator had approved Covaxin for this age group?

Around 10 pm on December 25, 2021, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced in a televised address that the Union health ministry would roll out COVID-19 vaccines for young adults aged 15-18 years as well as booster doses frontline and healthcare workers and the elderly (if they have a doctor’s certificate).

Since the government didn’t avail officials to elaborate on the decision at the late hour, here are 10 questions the Union health ministry and Prime Minister Modi should answer if the announcement is to make more sense.

1. On December 24, vaccination drive chief Vinod K. Paul, Indian Council of Medical Research chief Balram Bhargava and Union health secretary Rajesh Bhushan had said in a presser that their decisions are guided by science and that there isn’t any scientific basis yet to necessitate paediatric vaccination. Are we to believe the science changed substantially between December 24 evening and December 25 night? If so, what exactly changed?

2. Which vaccines will frontline workers, healthcare workers and the elderly receive as booster doses? What will the rationale be for these decisions considering the Paul-Bhargava-Bhushan triumvirate admitted on December 24 that there haven’t been studies thus far about Covaxin’s efficacy or its benefit as a booster dose – both against the omicron variant?

Addendum: Why has the emergency-approval for the Covavax vaccine, filed by Serum Institute, been delayed? Covovax was developed by Novavax and CEPI, and Novavax transferred the technology to Serum. This question arises because a) the WHO has already listed Covovax on its emergency-use vaccines roster, b) there has been a study from England saying the Covovax-equivalent there has been found to safely boost two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, and c) India is already exporting Covovax.

Also read: Since May 1, Private Facilities Have Administered Just 4% of COVID Vaccines

3. Did the Indian government wait to change its policy on vaccinating teenagers until the drug regulator had approved Covaxin for this age group? Because the government had approved Zydus Cadila’s ZyCoV-D for teenagers in August and the evidence for the need to vaccinate children hasn’t changed substantially since.

4. More worryingly, did the Indian government change its policy on vaccinating teenagers only because the drug regulator had approved Covaxin for this age group (considering the evidence at the moment on the need to vaccinate minors is iffy and debatable)? Put another way, if the regulator hadn’t approved Covaxin – no matter how unlikely such rejection – would government officials have continued to say they’re still unconvinced of the need to vaccinate children?

Also read: Modi, Kejriwal Don’t Think Omicron Is Spreading Locally. So Why Are They Prepping for a Crisis?

5. Covaxin maker Bharat Biotech has said it has formulated the vaccine such that the same dose works for those aged 15-18 years and for those older. How will this change the company’s manufacturing and supply calculi? Will existing stock start being diverted to vaccinate teenagers from January 3, 2022?

6. Bharat Biotech reportedly submitted data from phase 2/3 trials for Covaxin for those aged 15-18 years, conducted in India, to the Drug Controller General. Is this data in the public domain, for independent verification? Or must we wait until tens of thousands of teenagers have been vaccinated before we’re offered a preprint paper?

Addendum: What about the deliberations of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, of the National Expert Group on Vaccine Administration for COVID-19 and of the Subject Expert Committee – all of which should have pointed the way for the drug regulator’s decision?

7. The one other vaccine the drug regulator has approved for use among those aged 12-18 years is ZyCoV-D, made by Zydus Cadila. The phase 3 trial data for this product isn’t available in the public domain either. Why?

8. Why must elderly citizens get a doctor’s certificate in order to receive booster doses while teenagers straightforwardly qualify for primary doses when the scientific evidence is ordered the other way: that SARS-CoV-2’s effects become worse the older you are, especially if you’re 60+, whereas the prevalence of disease, mild or severe, has been very low among minors? Remember that the vaccines’ primary outcome is preventing severe disease, and transmission can be cut by better designing and enforcing COVID-appropriate behaviour.

9. How will informed consent work with people aged younger than 18 years? This isn’t as simple as the buck stopping with their parents. For example, what happens when parents are opposed to a vaccine but their child wants one, or vice versa? Or when one parent is in favour of vaccination but the other is against? The UK uses a test called the Gillick competence to arbitrate such cases. The test stipulates: “the parental right to determine whether or not their minor child below the age of sixteen will have medical treatment terminates if and when the child achieves sufficient understanding and intelligence to understand fully what is proposed.”

10. Why is the prime minister making announcements about expanding the vaccination programme that are at odds with what representatives of the epidemiology and vaccination enterprises have been saying? And why is the prime minister making announcements related to healthcare at all instead of more informed officials who can answer questions from journalists and independent experts? (We may know the answer, but we must still ask.)

With inputs from Banjot Kaur.

Modi, Kejriwal Don’t Think Omicron Is Spreading Locally. So Why Are They Prepping for a Crisis?

Our situation would be laughable if there weren’t lives at stake: two major political leaders, one heading the country and the other the capital, have played down the extent of the problem yet are openly preparing for a crisis.

There’s an underrated Tamil film, released in 2014, called Vaayai Moodi Pesavum – Tamil for ‘Shut your mouth and talk’. It’s about the outbreak of a fictitious virus that spreads when people talk, in a fictitious hilltop town where the state’s incompetent health minister (in the story) happens to be vacationing.

As the first cases are being reported, the minister is invited to a TV talk show along with a member of a rival party. When the host asks how the minister’s government plans to respond, the minister says it plans to purchase and distribute face masks and medicines en masse to prevent an outbreak. This is a time when little is known about the virus – much less that it spreads when people talk – so the minister is lampooned for his ignorant answer.

The member of the rival party also alleges that the government is simply preparing for a scam, in mask procurement, even as it fans the flames of panic by suggesting with the widespread distribution of masks and medicines that the virus is contagious. This is an important tidbit: that the government communicates just as much when it communicates per se as it does in the manner in which it prepares for something.

Also read: Global COVID Deaths This Year Exceed Combined Death Toll of HIV, TB, Malaria in 2020

This morning, The Wire Science published a report on three COVID-19 preparedness review meetings that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and Union health ministry secretary Rajesh Bhushan had each chaired vis-à-vis their plans to ensure India’s and the national capital’s healthcare systems don’t crumble in the coming weeks, as the country and the city both rack up more cases of the omicron variant. (The tally today stands at 358.)

This was a Vaayai Moodi Paesavum moment.

The Indian government has been prevaricating on the need for booster doses and vaccines for children – even to the extent of tacking these groups on to the bottom of the priority hierarchy. (It’s possible that the government is wary of the better-informed but less common-sense-bearing elite rushing to hog all the available vaccines once more, but there has been neither communication nor evidence in the public domain to support this view.)

There may be too few cases of the omicron variant in the country to support national studies about disease severity and effect on vaccine-induced immunity. But at the same time, the government has also been far from willing to consider that the omicron variant is spreading locally: its press releases have all insisted that new people infected by the variant travelled recently (and that if any died, they did because of their comorbidities).

On Thursday, Modi asked the top government officials present in his meeting to improve contact-tracing efforts. We remember the time when the government denied community transmission of the novel coronavirus well into the country’s first major outbreak in early- to mid-2020; former ICMR epidemiology chief Raman Gangakhedkar was the first government official in fact to admit the possibility, in a July 2020 interview to The Wire, albeit only after he had retired.

But by conducting review meetings chaired by the prime minister, the government is now signalling more than caution: that there is an outbreak in the offing. Mind you, neither the Union health ministry nor other ministries and departments have said anything explicitly about the possibility of an omicron- or a delta-fuelled ‘third wave’. But at the same time, its meetings – and the focus therein on speeding up vaccination, conducting more tests, readying hospital beds, antiviral drug and liquid medical oxygen supplies, keeping the TPR below 10%, and imposing night and/or weekend curfews – point almost unequivocally in the direction of an imminent outbreak.

Watch: ‘Delaying COVID Boosters Could Result in 5% More Deaths Than Otherwise’: Top Virologist

This discordance is further accentuated on Delhi chief minister Kejriwal’s part. In his review meeting, Kejriwal reportedly said that the national capital is preparing to confront a worst-case scenario of 1 lakh new cases per day. As The Wire Science report notes, Delhi reported 26,000 new COVID-19 cases at the height of the devastating second wave. If the chief minister believes that preparing for four-times as many cases should reassure his people, he would be wrong.

As with Prime Minister Modi and health secretary Bhushan, this is Kejriwal’s tacit admission that the city could in fact have that many new cases in an impending outbreak, likely of the omicron variant, and that that is what the city is preparing for. And like Modi and Bhushan and others, the Kejriwal government is yet to admit the possibility that the omicron variant could be spreading locally – instead of continuing to be ‘imported’ by international travellers.

(Even if the omicron variant really causes milder disease than the delta, it spreads more, and as Shahid Jameel put it, a fraction of a large number is still a large number.)

Our situation would be laughable if there weren’t lives at stake: two major political leaders, one heading the country and the other the capital, have played down the extent of the problem yet are openly preparing for a crisis. To make things worse, the basis of Keriwal’s assurances is also questionable – for things to get worse to the point of there being one lakh new cases a day, and the demand for medical oxygen soaring to require the city to deploy its growing fleet of tankers.

Instead, and given that it continues to believe that the omicron variant isn’t moving around locally, the Delhi government should earmark tests to identify and mitigate transmission ‘hotspots’, and its resources for contact-tracing, isolation and vaccination.

Vaayai Moodi Paesavum concludes by suggesting that a big chunk of our problems would go away if we started to think before talking. Its story presumes the existence of ministers who don’t know what they’re talking about. Our ministers, however, aren’t plagued by a lack of knowledge. They just think the people should be.

Google Says Employees Flouting Vaccination Rules Will Lose Pay, Be Fired

A memo circulated by Google’s leadership said employees had until December 3 to declare their vaccination status and upload documentation.

Alphabet Inc’s  Google told its employees they would lose pay and eventually be fired if they do not follow its COVID-19 vaccination rules, CNBC reported on Tuesday, citing internal documents.

A memo circulated by Google’s leadership said employees had until December 3 to declare their vaccination status and upload documentation showing proof, or to apply for a medical or religious exemption, according to the report.

Also read: Can’t Deny People Livelihood by Linking Vaccination to Employment, Says Manipur HC

Employees who have not complied with the vaccination rules by January 18 will be placed on “paid administrative leave” for 30 days, CNBC reported, followed by “unpaid personal leave” for up to six months and termination.

Earlier this month, Google delayed its return-to-office plan indefinitely amid Omicron variant fears and some resistance from its employees to company-mandated vaccinations. It earlier expected staff to return to office for about three days a week from January 10.

Austria’s Vaccine Mandate, COVID Regulations Invite Mass Protests

The agitation saw an estimated 44,000 people, and followed a similar demonstration in the Austrian capital last week.

Vienna: Tens of thousands of people rallied in Vienna on Saturday in protest against restrictions introduced to halt the spread of coronavirus in Austria, including mandatory COVID-19 vaccines and home confinement orders for the unvaccinated.

Around 1,400 police officers were on duty to oversee the protest, which attracted an estimated 44,000 people, and followed a similar demonstration in the Austrian capital last week.

Also read: Coronavirus: Austria Approves Lockdown for Unvaccinated Persons

Police said three people were arrested for offences including the use of fireworks and disregarding the requirement to wear masks.

“Journalists covering the event, which began in Heldenplatz square, were attacked with snow balls and ice, and one reporter was the victim of an attempted assault,” police said.

The crowd was addressed by Herbert Kickl, leader of the right-wing Austrian Freedom Party, who attacked the government’s response to the pandemic. He said the public had not realised they were being “kicked in the arse” by the government, and said the protests would continue.

Faced with surging daily infections, Austria last month became the first country in Western Europe to reimpose a lockdown and said it would make vaccinations mandatory from February.

Banners saying “No to compulsory vaccination” and “Hands off our children” were carried by protesters in Vienna, who chanted “We are the people,” and “resistance”.

Austria, which has a population of 8.9 million people, has reported 1.2 million coronavirus cases and more than 13,000 deaths since the pandemic began last year.

With the Omicron Variant, Let’s Hope for the Best and Prepare for the Worst

There is an immediate need to ramp up genomic sequencing, vaccination and testing.

The omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2 virus was declared a ‘variant of concern’ by WHO on November 26, 2021. It has sent alarm bells ringing all over the world. International travel is being impacted. First reported from South Africa – even though it may not have originated there – cases of people infected by this variant have been reported from Botswana, Australia, Israel, Hong Kong and several countries of Europe. It seems to have spread by the time it was detected first in South Africa, through genome sequencing.

Physicians in South Africa have said that people infected by this variant have thus far typically developed mild symptoms. But the WHO has suggested caution because not enough is known about it yet. Of course, there should be no panic.

Moderna has said that the efficacy of its vaccine against infections of the omicron variant may be reduced, while reports from the Netherlands suggest that the new variant was already in Europe before it was detected in South Africa. The implication is – as with earlier variants – the omicron variant spread across the world by the time it was declared a ‘variant of concern’. This has some implications, including whether travel bans can help.

Present concerns

Omicron has caught experts’ attention because it reportedly has over 50 mutations, with 30 of them pertaining to the spike protein of the novel coronavirus. The spike protein is critical: it enables the virus to enter human cells and seize their cellular machinery. The current vaccines also train our bodies’ immune systems to recognise the spike protein and mount the immune response.

If the spike protein has mutated beyond a point, it may be the case that vaccines can’t train our bodies to recognise it. (The vaccines were designed and tested against the ‘original’ strain, B.1). This is also Moderna’s basis for caution.

Also read: Through Bulletin, INSACOG First Official Body To Advise Boosters Against Omicron

There have been some reports that the omicron variant could – speculatively, in the absence of more and better data – better evade naturally acquired or vaccine-induced immunity than the delta variant, as well as spread faster. Preliminary reports from South Africa also suggest that computer modelling has indicated that the immunity due to the T cells may also be dodged by omicron – this would be really worrying.

While experts work on producing more data to help us understand how the omicron variant will affect the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to learn from the experience of the last two years, even if it isn’t always correct to extrapolate from the past.

Lessons from previous waves

Currently, there have been some indications that the wave likely to be induced by the omicron variant will be milder than the second wave in India. If this expectation turns out to be correct, the cost for society will not be high. However, the experience of the last two years is to be prepared for the worst and hope for the best, and perhaps most importantly, that we shouldn’t lose time. Complacency can be very costly anyway.

In 2020, India reported its first case of a SARS-CoV-2 infection on January 30. By the time PM Modi announced the national lockdown on March 24,  there were only 37 cases and the seven-day moving average was 56. The government has since been criticised for announcing the lockdown too early.

And due to poor implementation, the numbers peaked to a seven- day moving average of 93,000 by mid-September. The government had, however, started to ease restrictions via unlock, from June, when the number of cases were still rising. There was a breakdown of healthcare systems in major metropolitan centres because the numbers kept rising. Rural India appeared to have been left to its own devices.

The alpha variant was first reported from the UK in November 2020, and the number of cases there rose in alarming fashion. It was found that it had been circulating since September 2020. By the time it was declared a ‘variant of concern’ by the WHO, it had spread across the world.

The delta variant was first reported in March 2021, but had been circulating at least since December 2020. In mid-February, there were about 9,500 cases a day in India. By 20 March 2021, the numbers rose 400%. By the time it was declared a ‘variant of concern’, it had spread worldwide and had become the dominant variant wherever it went. India also continued with ‘super-spreader events’, and the infection spread rapidly to reach a peak of above 4 lakh cases a day in May 2021. Health systems were overwhelmed – especially in the form of a severe oxygen shortage in North India –  and needless deaths occurred.

Equity needed 

The novel coronavirus keeps mutating. We don’t yet know how different mutations combine to add or subtract the virus’s various attributes. But we also know that the omicron variant has all the mutations we have associated thus far (in previous ‘variants of concern’) with faster transmission. At this point, we need to quickly find out more about its ability to escape natural or vaccine-induced immunity.

Some experts had started talking of the virus’s spread having reached an endemic stage: that it is likely to stay in the human population, just as flu and other virus-borne diseases have persisted. It has also been suggested that vaccines may have to be tweaked every year to fight new variants that might emerge.

Also read: Bengaluru Municipal Corporation Says One Man With Omicron Infection Had No Travel History

But matters may not be as bad as when the disease erupted in January 2020. New vaccines can be developed quickly, since the corresponding technology has advanced rapidly in the last two years., The protocols of dealing with the infection are also more mature than they were two years back.

It has also become clear that as long as there is a large number of unprotected people, the virus can infect them, spread quickly and mutate more. The implication is that there is an urgent need to address vaccine hesitancy on the one hand and inequity in the availability of vaccines within nations and across nations on the other. In many nations in Africa, very few have been vaccinated. In India, about 31% have received both doses. Even in advanced countries like the US, vaccine hesitancy has meant a gap between those who are partly vaccinated – 70% of the eligible population – and those fully vaccinated, about 59%. So a large number of people remain vulnerable and can be severely infected as well as become a host for further mutations. Equity in distribution of vaccines is crucial to reduce the chances of mutation.

What needs to be done?

There is an immediate need to ramp up genomic sequencing, vaccination and testing. Since the number of cases are still few and isolated, contact tracing will be useful to limit the spread. Health infrastructure needs to be ramped up in case the situation turns grave – we should not be caught napping like during the second wave. Shortage of health personnel will continue, but the emergency steps suggested earlier need to be taken promptly. Within a short period of time, we will know how fast the new variant is capable of spreading and we can decide the restrictions that maybe needed based on that.

The economic impact will be again focused on the marginalised sections of society, who may again lose jobs and incomes. This will further impact demand which has not yet recovered to the pre-pandemic levels and the expected economic recovery may be set back. The bubble created in the stock markets could deflate further. The government’s tax revenue has been buoyant and it should immediately plan to step up support to the vulnerable sections, instead of simply trying to keep the fiscal deficit down. Global supply bottlenecks are likely to be aggravated further and will impact production, like India’s auto sector has been impacted by the shortage of chips.

Arun Kumar is Malcolm Adiseshiah Chair Professor at the Institute of Social Sciences and the author of Indian Economy’s Greatest Crisis: Impact of the Coronavirus and the Road Ahead (2020, Penguin Random House).

Nurses’ Unions of 28 Nations Complain to UN Against Rich Countries’ TRIPS Waiver Reluctance

The human cost of their sustained opposition to the temporary suspension of the intellectual property rights arrangement amounts to rights violations on a global scale, unions representing 2.5 billion health workers have said.

New Delhi: Unions representing 2.5 million health workers from 28 countries have filed a complaint with the United Nations alleging human rights violations by the European Union, the United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland and Singapore – over their refusal to temporarily waiver intellectual property rights to ensure faster access to vaccines during the pandemic.

The coalition of nurses’ unions have claimed that the EU and the four countries are responsible for the loss of “countless lives” during the pandemic, due to their “continued opposition” to a waiver of the rights under the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement)”.

The complaint comes on the eve of the vital WTO ministerial conference in Geneva starting on November 30, which has now been postponed due to the deteriorating health situation presented by the Omicron variant.

India, along with South Africa, had proposed the waiver at the World Trade Organization last year, as a way to speed up the manufacture and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines to low- and moderate-income countries.

Shyamal Misra, a senior official at the Union Ministry of Commerce, had told Reuters before the Geneva meet was postponed that India would not just be speaking for itself at the but for other developing countries with which it is working closely.

Also read: Covax Has Received Only 13% of Doses It Needs, While Countries Turn to Boosters

More than 45% of the world’s population has still not received even one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, a press release by the Global Nurses United (GNU) and the Progressive International (PI), which coordinated the effort, has said.

Global Nurses United represents more than 30 leading nurses and healthcare workers unions on every continent. The Progressive International includes social movements, political parties, and trade unions that represent millions of people around the world.

“COVID-19 cases continue to soar in numerous parts of the world, while pharmaceutical companies and governments have failed to ensure that critical treatments and vaccines are distributed equitably in order to respond to the pandemic,” the nurses’ unions wrote in the complaint addressed to Dr. Tlaleng Mofokeng, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on Physical and Mental Health.

The complaint calls on Mofokeng to lead an investigation into the “immediate threat to people’s right to health caused by failure by the certain states and institutions.” It draws on human rights obligations that WTO member states are legally bound to, including the recent expert opinion by the International Commission of Jurists stating that “it is incumbent on all states to desist from blocking the TRIPS waiver,” PI has written in the release.

“High-income countries have procured upwards of 7 billion confirmed vaccine doses, while low-income countries have only been able to procure approximately 300 million doses. This has created what public health advocates around the world have described as ‘vaccine apartheid.’”

“Nurses and other health care workers have been on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic response, and we have witnessed the staggering numbers of deaths and the immense suffering caused by political inaction,” the petition noted.

Mofokeng, in her response, welcomed the position presented by nurses and activists.

The nurses’ core demand is one I share: States have a collective responsibility to use all available means to facilitate faster access to vaccines, including by introducing [the] temporary waiver…” she said, noting that nurses and healthcare workers have been on the front line of keeping people safe and “have witnessed the most painful and heart-wrenching effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Jibin T.C., president of India’s largest trade union of nurses, the United Nurses Association, with over 500,000 members, is quoted in the press release as noting the two frontiers that health workers operate on.

“We have always been fighting two battles: Against the virus in the emergency wards, and against corporate interests in the halls of power,” said Jibin.

The nurses’ coalition is not the only one to have forwarded such a demand. More than 130 civil society groups largely from developing countries had called on the WTO to concentrate on approving the intellectual property waiver for COVID-19 vaccines.

The groups, organised under a loose coalition called “Our World is Not For Sale,” said in a letter on Wednesday to WTO members that “vaccine apartheid” caused by WTO intellectual property rules must be resolved first.

Amnesty International, Doctors without Borders, Human Rights Watch, Public Citizen and 11 others had additionally urged US President Joe Biden to personally push countries for a vaccine waiver under the TRIPS agreement.