‘OTT Platforms at Times Show Pornographic Content, Need Screening’: Supreme Court

The apex court was hearing the appeal of Amazon Prime Video’s India head Aparna Purohit against the Allahabad high court order rejecting her anticipatory bail in connection with FIRs lodged over ‘Tandav.’

New Delhi: Some over-the-top (OTT) platforms at times show pornographic content and there should be a mechanism to screen such programmes, the Supreme Court said on Thursday, March 4, and asked the Centre to place its guidelines on regulating social media.

The apex court also fixed on Friday the hearing on the appeal of Amazon Prime Video’s India head Aparna Purohit against the Allahabad high court order rejecting her anticipatory bail in connection with FIRs lodged over web series Tandav.

“We are of the view that some screening of OTT content should take place. A balance has to be struck as some OTT platforms are also showing pornographic materials on their platforms,” a bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and R.S. Reddy said.

During the brief hearing conducted through video conferencing, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Purohit, said the FIRs against her are “shocking” as she is an employee of Amazon and neither a producer nor an actor but still she has been made an accused in around 10 cases relating to the web series across the country.

Also read: Amazon Prime Video Apologises Once Again for ‘Tandav’

“These are all publicity seekers who have been filing cases all over India. Look at the FIR, look at what is happening. If you want to watch this web series, you have to pay to see this,” the senior lawyer said.

Several FIRs have been lodged in states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Bihar and Delhi.

The bench said that though traditional film viewing has become “obsolete,” those films are under a censor board.

“Our query is whether some screening is necessary or not, because you watch anything in your home like a cinema hall,” the bench observed.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, said, “They are showing filthy things with abuses too”.

Mehta said he would be placing on records the Information Technology (Guidelines for intermediaries and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.

Also read | Explainer: How the New IT Rules Take Away Our Digital Rights

Rohatgi on the other hand said the case against Purohit cannot be based on the regulation which is yet to come in force.

Tandav, a nine-episode political thriller starring Bollywood actors Saif Ali Khan, Dimple Kapadia and Mohammad Zeeshan Ayyub, started streaming recently.

Purohit has been accused of inappropriate depiction of Uttar Pradesh police personnel, Hindu deities and an adverse portrayal of a character playing the prime minister in the web series.

Earlier, the apex court, on January 27, had declined to grant interim protection from any coercive action to Ali Abbas Zafar, Director of the web series, Purohit, producer Himanshu Mehra, the show’s writer Gaurav Solanki and actor Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub.

It had said that they may seek bail from courts concerned in the FIRs lodged in connection with the web series.

Now, Purohit has appealed to the top court against the Allahabad high court’s February 25 order declining anticipatory bail to her.

The high court had observed, “Western filmmakers have refrained from ridiculing Lord Jesus or the Prophet but Hindi filmmakers have done this repeatedly and are still doing this most unabashedly with Hindu gods and goddesses.”

Amazon Prime Video Apologises Once Again for ‘Tandav’

This is the platform’s third apology for the show.

New Delhi: Streaming platform Amazon Prime Video, on Tuesday, once again apologised for its show Tandav and said it has already removed scenes found objectionable by viewers. This is the platform’s third apology for the show.

The cast and the crew of the Ali Abbas Zafar-directed series have apologised twice before.

The political saga, starring Saif Ali Khan and Mohammad Zeeshan Ayyub, attracted a volley of outrage from a section of viewers for a scene depicting a college theatre programme with a mention of religious figures, leading to allegations that the show hurt religious sentiments.

Multiple FIRs were filed against the showrunners. One of the charges was that the show had encouraged “an adverse portrayal of a character playing the prime minister”.

Some portions of the series were cut following outrage as it released.

On February 25, rejecting the anticipatory bail plea filed by the head of Amazon Prime Video’s India Originals Aparna Purohit, the Allahabad high court had observed that “names and icons of faith of the majority community have been used to earn money”.

“Amazon Prime Video again deeply regrets that viewers considered certain scenes to be objectionable in the recently launched fictional series ‘Tandav’. This was never our intention, and the scenes that were objected to were removed or edited when they were brought to our attention,” Amazon Prime said in a statement.

“We respect our viewers’ diverse beliefs and apologise unconditionally to anyone who felt hurt by these scenes. Our teams follow company content evaluation processes, which we acknowledge need to be constantly updated to better serve our audiences,” the company added.

The streamer said it will continue to develop entertaining content with partners while “complying with the laws of India and respecting the diversity of culture and beliefs of our audiences”.

Although legal cases against Netflix and Amazon Prime Video shows for offending beliefs are not uncommon in India, it is rare for a US tech giant to publicly apologise, Reuters has noted in its report.

(With PTI inputs)