Us Hate Groups Grow in Trump’s First Year, Says Watchdog

There were 954 hate groups in the country in 2017, marking a 4% increase over the previous year when the number rose 2.8%, the civil rights watchdog said in its annual census of such groups.

Riot police protect members of the Ku Klux Klan from counter-protesters as they arrive to rally in opposition to city proposals to remove or make changes to Confederate monuments in Charlottesville, Virginia, US, July 8, 2017. Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

Washington: The number of US hate groups expanded last year under President Donald Trump, fueled by his immigration stance and the perception that he sympathised with those espousing white supremacy, the Southern Poverty Law Center said on Wednesday

There were 954 hate groups in the country in 2017, marking a 4% increase over the previous year when the number rose 2.8%, the civil rights watchdog said in its annual census of such groups.

Since 2014, the number has jumped 20%, it said.

Among the more than 600 white supremacist groups, neo-Nazi organisations rose to 121 from 99. Anti-Muslim groups increased for a third year in a row, to 114 from 101 in 2016, the report said.

Last year brought “a substantial emboldening of the radical right, and that is largely due to the actions of President Trump, who’s tweeted out hate materials and made light of the threats to our society posed by hate groups,” Heidi Beirich, director of the SPLC’s Intelligence Project, told reporters.

Trump, who took office in January 2017, was elected in November of the previous year. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, founded in 1971, defines hate groups as organisations with beliefs or practices that demonise a class of people.

Demonstrators rally before the speech by Richard Spencer, an avowed white nationalist and spokesperson for the so-called alt-right movement, on the campus of the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida, US, October 19, 2017. Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

In the past, some groups have criticised the Alabama-based organisation’s findings, with skeptics saying it has mislabeled legitimate organisations as “hate groups.”

In August, Trump came under under fire for saying “both sides” were to blame for violence at a white supremacist rally in Virginia where a counter-protester was killed.

The Republican president was also criticised for a string of anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim comments, including using a vulgar term to describe Haiti and African countries last month.

In a backlash to Trump, the number of black nationalist groups such as the Nation of Islam increased by 20% last year, to 233, the non-profit’s report said. It added two male supremacy groups to its census for the first time.

A separate investigation by the group showed that people linked to the alt-right killed 43 people in the last four years, including 17 in 2017. The alt-right movement believes that white identity is under attack by multicultural forces.

The report identified 689 groups associated with the anti-government “Patriot” movement, with about 40% of them armed militias.

SPLC acknowledged that its report likely failed to capture the full extent of hate-group activity. It said many of them, especially from the alt-right, operate mainly online.

(Reuters)

Declining Numbers Show Indian Students are Wary of Heading to Trump’s US

An anti-immigrant rhetoric and a possible lack of jobs, along with steeper visa fees are scaring off Indian students from applying to US universities.

An anti-immigrant rhetoric and a possible lack of jobs, along with steeper visa fees are scaring off Indian students from applying to US universities.

Immigrant students graduate at a university in the US. Credit: Reuters/Files

Immigrant students graduate at a university in the US. Credit: Reuters/Files

New York/New Delhi: Like many other Indians, Ranjit Lal had originally planned to go to the US to study further. But then he changed his mind. “I chose Canada over the US because with Donald Trump in the White House there are too many uncertainties about US immigration policies. I can’t bet a future on winning a H-1B visa lottery versus good opportunities in Canada,” said Ranjit Lal, who has applied to McGill University in Montreal.

“I want to do my Master’s in engineering in McGill. Canada is an immigrant-friendly country. That’s what is most important to me,” added Lal.

Another student, a 22-year-old from Mumbai, said she scrapped her plans to apply to law schools in the US because she was concerned about getting an H1B visa after graduating – which would have made getting a job as a lawyer especially tricky since she would not have been able to practice in India.

International students, and not just from India, are backing out from applying to the US and looking at other alternatives, because the increasing anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies of the Trump administration are dampening enthusiasm among students for studying in the US.

A new survey reveals that four in ten US colleges have experienced a sharp decline in international applicants for the Fall 2017 term. Trump’s travel ban and hardline immigration policies have put off students from the Middle East and Muslim majority countries — that’s not surprising. But, initial findings of the survey also point to a decline in applicants from India and China, which together provide nearly half of the US’s international students.

More than three-quarters of institutions surveyed expressed concern about future enrollment. “Nearly 40% of responding US institutions are reporting a drop in international student applications, particularly from students in the Middle East,” showed the findings from a survey of 250 schools by six higher-education groups, including the Institute of International Education (IIE).

Indeed, the most telling decline in applicants came from the Middle East, with universities reporting a 39% decrease in undergraduate applications and a 31% decrease in graduate applications from the region.

Indian numbers dipping

But Indian students, who have been heading to the US in ever increasing numbers in recent years, are now wary of going to American institutions. According to the survey, 26% of universities reported a decline in undergraduate applications from India, in addition to a 15% decline in India’s graduate applications.

Malavika Bhatia, an education consultant at Ed Sanctuary in Delhi, is expecting a greater drop in undergraduate applicants for next year. Bhatia told The Wire, “It’s early in the season to compute right now but I would say two out of every, say, ten students have changed their mind over the past year.”

She has also gotten used to dealing with parents panicking about the recent racist attacks against Indians. Bhatia said, “Nearly every parent has this question [about safety]. Which is natural I think, but I just assure them that it’s not as much [of a concern] on the coasts and in liberal spaces.”

Wim Wiewel, president of Portland State University in Oregon, said his school saw a 37% reduction in applications from India for the new school year.

“I’d say the rhetoric and actual executive orders are definitely having a chilling effect,” said Wiewel, who travelled to Hyderabad to meet with ten students already admitted to his school’s graduate engineering programme.

People listen during a vigil in honour of Srinivas Kuchibhotla, an Indian immigrant who was recently shot and killed in Kansas, at Crossroads Park in Bellevue, Washington, on Sunday. Credit: Reuters

People listen during a vigil in honour of Srinivas Kuchibhotla, an Indian immigrant who was recently shot and killed in Kansas, at Crossroads Park in Bellevue, Washington, on Sunday. Credit: Reuters

Wiewel’s trip to Hyderabad came soon after residents of the city held funeral services for computer engineer Srinivas Kuchibhotla, who was killed by Adam W. Purinton, who yelled “get out of my country,” before opening fire on two Indians at Austin’s Bar and Grill in a Kansas City suburb. A second Indian engineer Alok Madasani was also injured in the Kansas hate crime along with a white man who tried to stop the gunman.

“I tried to reassure Indian students that the university’s environment is still very safe and very welcoming to international students,” said Wiewel.

It’s 2017, and not a month goes by in the US without reports of hate violence targeting Muslims, Arabs, Sikhs, South Asians, African Americans, Jews and Latinos. There is no question that Trump’s victory has brought the bigots out of the woodwork. In all, the Southern Poverty Law Center has documented a record 900 hate crimes, a lot of them in universities since the November election of Trump.

Aware of this, education professionals in the US are coming up with ways to woo Indians back to the US. Soon after the Kansas shooting, Marie Whalen from Whitworth University and Syed K. Jamal, CEO of Branta, a US-based company that provides support to Indian students, authored an ‘Open Letter from the United States to India’ telling students “#youbelonghere”.

Jamal told The Wire, “There was at least one story [about Indians experiencing racist or xenophobic] violence coming out in the Indian media every day… But that’s not how ALL of the US is.”

Countering negative media attention is just one part of Jamal’s plan for the coming months. He is also planning on releasing videos and conducting more media outreach to let Indian students know that the US is still a welcoming and safe place to study.

Jamal added that admissions officials who come to India to deliver informational talks are also rethinking how they pitch their colleges as they brace themselves for a greater drop in applications for the next academic year.

There are other concerns too. The Wire spoke to a number of Indian students – most of whom wanted to remain anonymous – who have cancelled or withdrawn their plans to apply to US colleges, and even declined offers of admission for the coming year. Graduate school applicants are especially concerned about their diminished chances of getting a job in the US after finishing their courses since the Trump administration has cracked down on H1B visas and also introduced legislation that will make it difficult for international students to stay on for long after getting their degree.

The H-1B visa issue was a political hot potato during the elections. It’s no surprise then that the issue is under fierce scrutiny under the Trump presidency. It’s not easy in any case for an immigrant working on an H-1B visa in the United States.

One student in Delhi backed out of applying to engineering masters programmes at the last minute – disregarding months of preparation, including the completed letters of recommendation that he’d requested to supplement his applications. In the past year, too many of his friends – some of them who had been working at software giants like Google and so could be considered to be competitive candidates for work visas – had failed to get H1Bs, leaving them with uncertain futures.

Trump’s new proposal to increase the salary requirement for H1B visas to $130,000 per annum had him especially worried. He told The Wire, “It’s going to be very difficult for people who don’t have high-paying engineering or finance jobs to meet that requirement.”

His father, who encouraged his son’s decision to apply to schools in other countries – Germany, Australia, Canada and the Netherlands seem to have gained the applicants the US has lost – cited “the increasing racism” and increasingly competitive requirements for H1B visas as the two primary reasons for the change of plans.

Dipping figures are a reversal of about a decade of steady increases in applications from international students, which pushed the number of international students studying in the US to over one million last year, according to the ‘Open Doors Report’ published by the IIE. International students brought about $36 billion last year to the US economy and universities have become increasingly dependent on that revenue.

In the last year alone, Indian students contributed $5 billion to the US economy, while Chinese students contributed another $11 billion.

On an average, international students pay much higher fees than locals and help US colleges plug the budget gaps caused by reductions in state funding. Public schools often charge international students two to three times what domestic students pay, thereby subsidising the cost of tuition for US students.

Worry about safety, stereotypes

The National Association for College Admissions Counseling (NACAC), one of the institutions conducting the survey, cited Trump’s travel ban as a hard line anti-immigrant policy queering the pitch.

“For educational institutions in the United States, the negative effects of the ban will extend far beyond 90 days and well beyond the six countries involved,” said Nancy Beane, president of the NACAC.

While China and India are not directly influenced by the travel ban, foreign students are conscious that President Trump’s anti-immigrant policies are predicated on a hyper-territorial worldview in which immigrants are cast as job stealers. The political discourse surrounding foreign nationals under the Trump presidency has led to concerns about safety, stereotypes and cultural differences, among other issues. These concerns may deter international students from hopping on a plane and earning an American degree.

College counsellors in India are already feeling the impact of these concerns. A counsellor, who works for one of NCR’s elite schools but is not authorised to speak to the press, said parents’ concerns have driven up interest in countries like Canada, Germany and Australia.

In the meantime, liberal arts institutions in India are gaining in popularity. Bhatia said Ashoka University, with its liberal arts mandate, has become a popular option since it doesn’t come with as hefty a price-tag and promises to be safer than its US counterparts. But for those who have set their heart on studying abroad, the US is losing the charm it once had and there is no saying when the numbers will start increasing again.

Trump’s New Chief Strategist Once Described Modi’s Election as Part Of ‘Global Revolt’

Stephen Bannon also praised the Modi government for “banning” Greenpeace.

Stephen Bannon’s media outlet also praised the Modi government for “banning” Greenpeace.

US president-elect Donald Trump with his chief strategist and White House senior counsellor Stephen Bannon (right). Credit: Reuters

US president-elect Donald Trump with his chief strategist and White House senior counsellor Stephen Bannon (right). Credit: Reuters

New Delhi: Exactly a month after Narendra Modi was sworn in as prime minister, an American media baron described his “great victory” as part of a “global revolt” against crony capitalism. Two years on, Steve Bannon is most likely to be US president-elect Donald Trump’s most influential advisor, but not without controversy.

Buzzfeed News published the full transcript of Bannon’s session at the conference organised by the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, a Catholic NGO, in June 2014. The theme of the conference held at the Pontifical Academy for Social Sciences in the Vatican City was “Poverty and the Common Good: Putting the ‘Preferential Option for the Poor’ at the Service of Human Dignity”. Bannon was the last speaker of the two-day conference, and spoke at a session titled “Should Christians impose limits on wealth creation?”

Bannon, who heads Breitbart News Media, an alt-right media group, claimed that there was an ongoing global “centre-right” revolt. “I think you’re going to see it in Latin America, I think you’re going to see it in Asia, I think you’ve already seen it in India,” he said.

“Modi’s great victory was very much based on these Reaganesque principles, so I think this is a global revolt, and we are very fortunate and proud to be the news site that is reporting that throughout the world,” he added.

Bannon’s views on Modi’s victory were put in the  context of an alleged backlash from conservative working class and middle-class voters against “crony capitalists”. He described this backlash as having led the UK Independence Party and far right groups in Europe to political prominence.

“The theme is all the same. And the theme is middle-class and working-class people — they’re saying, “Hey, I’m working harder than I’ve ever worked. I’m getting less benefits than I’m ever getting through this, I’m incurring less wealth myself, and I’m seeing a system of fat cats who say they’re conservative and say they back capitalist principles, but all they’re doing is binding with corporatists.” Right? Corporatists, to garner all the benefits for themselves,” Bannon said.

He also noted that his main concern was that the West had forgotten the “Judeo-Christian” foundation of capitalism.

“But the thing that got us out of it, the organizing principle that met this, was not just the heroism of our people — whether it was French resistance fighters, whether it was the Polish resistance fighters, or it’s the young men from Kansas City or the Midwest who stormed the beaches of Normandy, commandos in England that fought with the Royal Air Force, that fought this great war, really the Judeo-Christian West versus atheists, right?”

He noted that the “enlightened form of capitalism” was the reason that provided the support and “built the materials needed to support …. the Soviet Union, England, the United States, and eventually to take back continental Europe and to beat back a barbaric empire in the Far East”.

Bannon was Trump’s third campaign chairman, but had been using his news empire to champion the real estate billionaire from the start.

A Guardian profile of Bannon in August, a week after his formal appointment to the campaign, tracked how Breitbart had relentlessly attacked Trump’s opponents from the Republican primaries stage. It quoted a former Breitbart editor as describing the news outlet as “Trump Pravda”.

Southern Poverty Law Center, a US-based NGO that tracks alt-right violence and propaganda, described Breitbart as a “far-right website that caters to white nationalists”. Incidentally, on Tuesday, Breitbart threatened to sue a “major media company” for describing it as a white nationalist website.

The importance of Bannon’s appointment is evident with his name being mentioned above that of Reince Preibus, who has been tapped as the president-elect’s chief of staff, in the communique from the Trump transition team.

While Bannon had remained in the shadows during the campaign, his role in the Trump White House as chief political strategist has evoked a firestorm of criticism, with critics describing his views as “anti-Semitic, anti-minority and misogynistic”.

Following Trump’s win, Buzzfeed compiled some of the “incendiary stories” written by Bannon, which included articles against Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, prominent Jewish conservatives who opposed Trump, the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement and Muslim immigration.

A search on Breitbart for India-related news brought up many wire reports on tensions between India and Pakistan, and demonetisation.

But there were also some in-house reports from Breitbart contributors, including an approving March 2016 article about Christian proselytisation apparently increasing in India despite “anti-Christian violence”.

On May 30, Breitbart published a report to show how “Indian-owned and connected companies are at the center of the H-1B controversy, but most Americans aren’t even aware of who these companies are”.

“While many well-meaning conservatives spent their time talking about the low skill workers coming over the border illegally from Mexico and Central America, they ignored the wage stagnation caused by the planeloads of H-1B workers flying legally into the country from India,” it said in that report.

A Washington Post report on Tuesday analysed Trump’s interviews on Stephen Bannon’s radio shows to glean some insight into their relationship. Among other takeaways, It showed that Trump was more keen to keep highly-skilled foreign students from Ivy League schools inside the country, but Bannon was not too keen, pointing out the high number of South Asian CEOs in Silicon Valley.

We have to be careful of that, Steve. You know, we have to keep our talented people in this country,” Trump said. He paused. Bannon said, “Um.”

“I think you agree with that,” Trump said. “Do you agree with that?”

Bannon was hesitant.

“When two-thirds or three-quarters of the CEOs in Silicon Valley are from South Asia or from Asia, I think . . . ” Bannon said, not finishing the sentence. “A country is more than an economy. We’re a civic society.” [Link]

Last year in November, Breitbart praised the Modi government for “banning” Greenpeace. “Alternatively, you could argue, it’s the Indian government doing what not even Putin’s Russia was capable of doing when push came to shove (during the Greenpeace Arctic 30 affair): telling this richly-funded, pan-global outfit of vexatious, mendacious, bleeding heart meddlers exactly where they can stick their environmental activism,” said the report, titled ‘Grab An Onion And Weep For Humanity: India Just Outlawed Greenpeace‘.

Bannon’s appointment as Trump’s chief political strategist also drew criticism from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a US organisation combating anti-Semitism. “It is a sad day when a man who presided over the premier website of the Alt Right, a loose-knit group of white nationalists and unabashed anti-Semites and racists – is slated to be a senior staff member in the ‘people’s house,” the ADL said in a statement. Breitbart countered by pointing out that Trump had the “strongest pro-Israel platform ever”. The difference in response highlighted the conflict in the Jewish-American community, especially since many prominent Trump critics who happen to be Jewish had been subjected to a torrent of anti-Semitism over social media.

Racism, Xenophobia and Misogyny Come Bubbling to the Surface After Trump’s Victory

The naming of an open racist like Stephen Bannon raises concerns about the Trump administration’s agenda

Attacks on minorities, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim rants, and open intimidation have risen. Is this a sign of things to come in a Trump-led US?

US president-elect Donald Trump with his chief strategist and White House senior counsellor Stephen Bannon (right). Credit: Reuters

US president-elect Donald Trump with his chief strategist and White House senior counsellor Stephen Bannon (right). Credit: Reuters

Washington: “This land is (not) your land, this land is my land, from California to the New York island,” is the message of the last six days, ever since Donald Trump was elected president by a divided country. His supporters are emboldened and increasingly acting out their secret dreams.

The spirit of Woody Guthrie’s famous song lies crushed by forces that Trump actively unleashed during his campaign. Attacks on minorities, racist graffiti, messages threatening lynching, anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim rants, and open intimidation are on the rise, scaring immigrant children in schools, foreign students on university campuses and ordinary people of colour across the US.

High school students have walked down school lunchrooms shouting “white power” and “build the wall” in the faces of Hispanic students. In Minnesota, black students found “Go back to Africa” written on a toilet paper dispenser at school. A man in Michigan threatened to set a Muslim woman on fire unless she removed her hijab.

A church in the suburbs of the US capital had a sign advertising Spanish-language services ripped and replaced with “Trump Nation, Whites Only”. That it was in Montgomery County in Maryland known for its high achievers and high-income levels shocked the pastor.

Black students at the University of Pennsylvania found themselves in a group message from “Daddy Trump” that threatened violence with old photos of lynchings to make the point. The message apparently came from Oklahoma.

College and school authorities are taking unprecedented steps to punish the perpetrators. Administrators are writing pre-emptive letters to students on campuses that are still untouched.

More than 250 racist incidents have been recorded since election day by the Southern Poverty Law Center, the largest tracker of such crimes in the country. “The white supremacists out there are celebrating his victory and many are feeling their oats,” Richard Cohen, president of the organisation, told USA Today.

Yet equally, many white students are rallying around to protect minority students following the basic credo: If you are silent in times of oppression, you are on the side of the oppressor. “White silence is white violence,” is how one student described the “zeitgeist of the times.”

Hundreds of people showed up to escort Natasha Nikhama from class to class at Baylor University in Texas after she was abused with the “n-word”. “IWalkWithNatasha” became a popular hashtag on Twitter.

But the aftermath of Trump’s victory should hardly surprise anyone. The ugliness was baked into the election campaign. The candidate himself pandered to the worst instincts of his supporters, inciting them to violence against protesters and the media.

Trump rallies were a celebration of white power and no one else was welcome. They wouldn’t tolerate even supporters of another colour – a young Indian American wearing a Trump t-shirt was thrown out. “Make America Great Again” was nothing but code for Make America White Again – a line that is being sprayed with Swastikas on garage doors and bathroom mirrors since the verdict.

Trump the president-elect is trying to be different. After his surprise victory, he said he wanted to be president of “all Americans”. When pressed about reports of attacks, he said he was “so saddened” by the reports.

“If it helps, I will say this, and I will say right to the cameras: Stop it.” While this late intervention is important, his wider message still is mixed and playing to the dark side.

In one of his first key appointments, he named Stephen Bannon as his chief strategist and senior counsellor at the White House. Bannon, who ran Trump’s campaign in the last phase, is widely known for his openly racist and misogynist views.

He is connected to the so-called “alt-right” movement led by a group of young extremists propagating white supremacy and conspiracy theories as normal fare. Bannon, in fact, gave the alt-right hate mongers a platform while he was the president of Breitbart News – itself an incendiary website – and expanded the fringe group’s reach.

A few headlines should be enough to give the flavour of what Bannon and his cohorts really feel about issues: “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism Or Cancer?,” “Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy,” “The Solution to Online ‘Harassment’ is Simple: Women Should Log Off,” “Data: Young Muslim Men in the West Are a Ticking Time Bomb, Increasingly Sympathising with Radicals, Terror,” and “Why Equality and Diversity Departments Should Only Hire Rich, Straight White Men.”

One wishes it were extreme satire but the alt-right makes traditional conservatism of Republicans seem mild. For the record, the Ku Klux Klan and the American Nazi Party welcomed Bannon going to the White House just as the KKK’s official newspaper had endorsed Trump’s candidacy.

Even the Republicans are outraged by Bannon’s appointment. As the news came on Monday, John Weaver, a Republican strategist, tweeted: “Be very vigilant America”.

But as an establishment Republican told me, “Bannon’s appointment is raw politics. You didn’t really expect Trump to throw him overboard after the election? The question is if Trump is really going to listen to Bannon or just keep him on his mantle piece.”

The fine point is not lost on those who are being attacked and are afraid to go out alone. Trump’s victory and the immediate aftermath have spurred record-breaking donations to the American Civil Liberties Union, a group fighting down in the weeds for the basic rights for citizens.

The question is can anyone put this genie back in the bottle?