The Burgeoning Share of Undertrial Prisoners in India’s Jails

For every ten prisoners in India, only two have been convicted of a crime. Among those awaiting trial, a disproportionate share come from marginalised communities.

India’s overcrowded prisons confined more than half a million inmates at the end of 2021, with a majority of them being those under trial for crimes they had allegedly committed. Among the 5,54,034 inmates across India’s prisons, 77.1% were under-trials and 22.2% were those who had been convicted by a court of law, data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) shows.

India currently has the sixth highest share of pre-trial detainees in the world, according to data collated by the World Prison Brief. The five countries that fare worse than India are Liechtenstein, San Marino, Haiti, Gabon and Bangladesh.

The slow turn of the wheels of justice 

This large share of the under-trial prison population is not a recent phenomenon, but has persisted for decades now. A Law Commission report from 1979 noted that the share of those in pre-trial detention was 57.6% as  of January 01, 1975, and the Commission lamented that “jails should primarily be meant for lodging convicts and not for houSing persons under trial.”

The share of under-trials has been consistently expanding, and saw a sharp jump in 2020 during the pandemic. Credit: Centre for Economic Data and Analysis

While India’s justice processes have been infamous for the slow dispensation of cases for a long time now, the COVID-19 pandemic further decelerated judicial processes.

The lockdowns imposed to check the spread of the disease and social distancing requirements severely restricted the functioning of Indian courts. After the nationwide lockdown was imposed on March 25, 2020, Indian courts worked on reduced capacity for months, bridling the trial and justice processes for thousands of Indians. Even as the number of prisoners grew, 2020 saw a fall in the number and share of convicts. The number of those under-trials continued to grow. This was despite efforts of the Supreme Court right from the early stages of the pandemic to decongest prisons to avoid the spread of the disease among inmates.

Those awaiting trial are spending longer time in prison over the years. Credit: Centre for Economic Data and Analysis

With the wheels of India’s trial courts turning slowly, those awaiting trial are spending longer time in prison over the years. In 2011, 40.1% of those under-trial had been in prison for less than three months, while almost 22% had been imprisoned for a year or more. By 2021, 29.1% of under-trials had been in prison for more than a year.

Prolonged undertrial detention leads to several concerns

Such lengthy detention of unsentenced prisoners has its origins in two common phenomena, notes Human Rights Watch: “the denial of pretrial release to criminal defendants, and the excessive duration of criminal proceedings.” And both of these violate international human rights norms, and “combined together they constitute a grievous affront to justice”, the international organisation observes. Additionally, the inability of several inmates to pay for their bail bonds means they end up languishing in prisons even when they could be out.

Prolonged undertrial detention leads to several concerns, according to a report by Amnesty International (2017). Such detention can violate the rights to liberty and fair trial, and also adversely impact the lives and livelihood of those incarcerated. Prolonged undertrial detention also increased the risk of torture or other ill-treatment.

These cautious observations need to be read against the context that undertrials in India tend to overwhelmingly come from marginalised backgrounds, with Dalits, Adivasis and religious minorities – especially Muslims and Sikhs – overrepresented among prison inmates.

Religious minorities are overrepresented among prison inmates, but there have been some shifts

A dominant share of those in prisons at the end of 2021 were men (95.8%) and those with little or no education. A quarter of all those in prison (25.2%) at the end of 2021 were illiterate, and another 40.2% had not studied beyond class tenth.

And those who come from minority religious and caste communities are overrepresented among prison populations.

The share of Hindus is lower among prisoners than their share in the population while Sikhs and Muslims are overrepresented among inmates. Credit: Centre for Economic Data and Analysis

While the share of Hindus is lower among convicts and under-trials than their share in the population, Sikhs and Muslims are overrepresented among both kinds of prisoners.

And there is a gap in the religious composition of those under-trial vis-a-vis those who have been convicted. Muslims are the only religious group whose share is larger among the under-trials than among the convicts, whereas for other groups, the trend is the opposite.

Around the world, those from marginalised communities are often more likely to be suspected of criminal behaviour, more likely to be detained in prison while awaiting a trial, and if convicted, likely to be punished more severely, says Fair Trials, a global criminal watchdog.

In India too, studies have pointed out a bias within the criminal justice system. A study from Maharashtra found that Muslims were overrepresented in jails in the state, and that there was a link between how the criminal justice system operated with the discrimination faced by those from the community (Raghavan and Nair, 2013).

The police is more likely to be suspicious of Muslims being prone to crime than other communities. Credit: Centre for Economic Data and Analysis

In their study of the status of policing in India (2019), Common Cause and the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies found an anti-Muslim bias among the police personnel surveyed. Respondents were asked about the extent to which people belonging to different communities were “prone towards committing crime”. Over half of those surveyed felt Muslims were somewhat or very likely to be so, a higher share than those who thought so for other communities. This bias was stronger in some states, such as Karnataka, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh, as compared to others. The survey, however, did not include Sikhs or Christians within the community categories.

There has, however, been a small but notable shift in the religious composition of prisoners in the last ten years. The share of all minority groups combined has seen a small fall, and that of Hindus has seen a small expansion since 2011, both among under-trials and convicts, though the shift has been slightly greater among convicts. In 2011, Hindus formed 70.5% of all under-trials and 71.7% of convicts, while Muslims 21.2% of under-trials and 17.8% of convicts.

Also Read | Book Review: Life in Indian Jails as an Undertrial Prisoner

Marginalised caste and tribal communities overrepresented

Along with religious minorities, those from marginalised caste and tribal communities are strikingly overrepresented among India’s prison population.

At the end of 2021, those from communities considered ‘Scheduled Castes’ formed 22.8% of under-trials and 21.7% of convicts, respectively, as compared to their share of 16.6% in the population as per the 2011 Census. And in contrast to their share of 8.6% in India’s population, those from Adivasi communities belonging to ‘Scheduled Tribe’ groups, comprised 10.7% of all under-trials and 14.1% of all convicts.

Adivasis in India often end up in prison while defending their collective rights on “jal, jameen and jungle” (water, land and forests), notes the Indigenous Peoples Rights International (IPRI) in its 2022 report ‘Criminalization of, Violence, and Impunity against Indigenous Peoples’.

This is not a recent phenomenon, but can be traced back to the British colonial rule which had declared over 150 Adivasi communities as criminals under the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871. The perception of the Adivasi communities has not changed significantly, notes IPRI, and continues to be seen as dangerous, and consequently more likely to be suspected of crime.

Credit: Centre for Economic Data and Analysis

But beyond their representation among the prison population at the end of 2021, a noteworthy trend emerges in the past ten years. Prison data since 2011 shows that while the share of SCs and STs has remained largely constant among India’s prison population, the share of those from ‘Other Backward Class’ communities (OBCs) has seen a notable rise. From comprising 29.5% of under-trials and 28.7% of convicts in 2011, the community’s share grew to 38.3% and 37.3% of under-trials and convicts, respectively, at the end of 2021.

In the same period, the share of those from “other” groups reduced.

Several states saw a rise in the share of inmates from the OBC communities among prisoners in the past decade. In Karnataka, for example, their share among under-trials jumped from under 5% between 2011 and 2017 to 51.3% in 2018, and from less than 10% before 2017 to 43.5% among convicts. Tamil Nadu too saw a spike in the period between 2011 and 2021.

However, the national trends seem to be driven by Uttar Pradesh which houses the largest share of prisoners from OBC communities in the country (at the end of 2021, 27.5% of OBC convicts and under-trials across India). In 2011, 36.2% of all under-trials in the state, and 36.1% of all convicts were from OBC communities. At the end of 2021, their share had risen to 46% and 46.7% respectively.

This shift – whether driven by changes in the classification of caste categories in these states, or by changes in the documentation methodology, or something entirely different – merits attention.

What are the ways out?

Currently, there are over 41 million cases in India’s lower courts and a little under six million cases in the country’s high courts, the National Judicial Data Grid shows. Over 63% of the cases in the lower courts and 77% in the high courts have been going on for over a year. Almost a quarter (23.6%) cases in the lower courts have been ongoing for more than five years, thousands of which have been ongoing for decades.

Navigating the legal system can be specifically challenging for those from marginalised communities. Lack of awareness, legal ignorance and lack of access to the right legal support and resources can mean that once imprisoned, they can end up being in jail for longer periods of time, often beyond the prescribed punishments for the crimes they have allegedly committed.

With that kind of backlog and burden facing our courts, the burgeoning shares of under-trial prisoners may remain a colossal challenge for our justice system to address for some time to come. In addition to fast-tracking the trial process, streamlined bail processes may help, a call made by none other than India’s Supreme Court recently.

This article was originally published by CEDA.

Elgar Parishad Accused Systematically Denied Medical Treatment: Family Members

In a statement, the family members said that in yet another “act of criminal negligence”, the prison authorities of Taloja Central Jail have delayed medical treatment to Vernon Gonsalves.

New Delhi: After the health of Vernon Gonsalves deteriorated due to the alleged negligence of prison staff, the family members of people accused in the Elgar Parishad case have slammed the pattern of “systematically” denying medical treatment to the prisoners and accused the authorities of “criminal negligence”.

Gonsalves, arrested for his alleged role in the case, was recently admitted to the state-run JJ Hospital in Mumbai. As per his lawyer, the activist he had been diagnosed with dengue and was on oxygen support.

The Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, in which over a dozen activists and academicians had been named accused, was initially probed by the Pune police and later taken over by the National Investigation Agency.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the family members of these arrested activists sought state intervention in the functioning of prison authorities to ensure speedy treatment to all “political prisoners”.

Citing Gonsalves’ condition, the statement claimed medical treatment was delayed and that it was yet another act of “criminal negligence” on the part of authorities of the Taloja Central Jail in neighbouring Navi Mumbai, where he was lodged.

“Gonsalves (65) had fever on August 30, and even though his condition was steadily deteriorating, he was treated with just paracetamol and antibiotics in jail for almost a week. After much pleading, he was taken to the JJ Hospital on September 7 and was given oxygen support,” the family members said.

“However, instead of continuing his treatment, he was callously brought back to jail where his condition continued to worsen. It is only after his lawyer and wife, Susan Abraham, approached court and obtained an order that the prison authorities finally admitted him in the emergency ward of the JJ Hospital, where he is still under treatment,” the statement said.

They cited the recent deaths of several undertrial prisoners, including Father Stan Swamy, after allegedly being denied prompt medical attention.

“It has barely been a year since Father Stan Swamy, also an accused in the Elgar case, passed away while still a prisoner after being denied prompt treatment following COVID-19,” it claimed.

“Similarly, it was only very recently that we heard the shocking news of the death of Pandu Narote, a 33-year-old Adivasi, in Nagpur jail where he was convicted under various UAPA charges for having Maoist links,” the statement said.

Narote’s lawyer also alleged that his death was caused due to gross negligence by the prison authorities, the family members alleged.

The statement also raised the health condition of PhD scholar Atiqur Rahman, accused in the Hathras conspiracy case. “Rahman was allowed to undergo heart surgery in AIIMS only after much campaigning and a court order, and yet was not allowed proper post-operative care. Today his left hand has been paralyzed and his family and lawyers are struggling to get him bail for further treatment,” the family members said.

They also expressed concern about the deteriorating condition of G.N. Saibaba, who is suffering from multiple ailments which need special attention – which is not being provided by the jail authorities.

Talking about poet-activist Varavara Rao, another accused in the case, the statement said he too was subjected to inhuman treatment in jail where he was denied proper medical care in spite of his age and various serious ailments.

It was only last month that he could acquire a medical bail from the Supreme Court.

The others accused in the case have also been systematically denied medical treatment, the family members said. They demanded the state should immediately and urgently intervene in the functioning of prisons to ensure the speedy treatment to all “political prisoners” such as Gautham Navlakha, Hany Babu and others, they said.

“We also demand the immediate release of political prisoners who are languishing in jail as undertrials for years. If the state is incapable of guaranteeing their safety and security in prison, it would be better that courts intervene to grant bail to these political prisoners so that their precious lives are saved,” they said.

The full statement and the signatories are reproduced below.

§

In yet another act of criminal negligence, the prison authorities of Taloja Central Jail, Maharashtra, have delayed medical treatment to Vernon Gonsalves, a prominent activist and one of the accused in the Bhima Koregaon – Elgar Parishad case.

Gonsalves, who is 65 years old, fell ill with fever on August 30th, and even though his condition was steadily deteriorating, he was treated with just paracetamol and antibiotics in jail, for almost a week. After much pleading, he was taken to JJ hospital on Sept 7 and was given oxygen support. However, instead of continuing his treatment he was callously brought back to jail where his condition continued to worsen.

It is only after his lawyer and wife, Susan Abraham, approached the court and obtained an order, that the prison authorities finally admitted him in the emergency ward of JJ hospital, where he is still under treatment. What is even more concerning here is that it was barely a month ago that the NIA court had denied mosquito nets for the Bhima Koregaon accused in a petition by Gautham Navlakha.

Both international treaties and prison manuals in India are clear about the fact that prisoners have the unalienable right to health care, including the right to not contract diseases in prison. However, the overcrowding of prisons in India, mainly due to the high number of undertrials, has led to prisons becoming hazardous to the life and health of its inmates. In addition to this, we see prison authorities behaving with absolute impunity by refusing to accord treatment in time, thereby leading to severe complications in many sick prisoners, and often, even death. Though VIP prisoners are often given preferential treatment in Indian jails, it is often the underprivileged and the political prisoners, who are subjected to such inhuman conduct.

In the Bhima Koregaon case itself, it has barely been a year since Father Stan Swamy, prominent activist and priest, passed away while still a prisoner, after being denied prompt treatment following Covid.

Similarly, it was only very recently that we heard the shocking news of the death of Pandu Narote, a 33 year old Adivasi man in Nagpur jail where he was convicted under various UAPA charges for having Maoist links. Narote’s lawyer has also alleged that his death was caused due to gross negligence by the prison authorities.

We are also witness to the disturbing case of PhD scholar Atiqur Rahman, who was arrested on his way to Hathras, after the brutal rape of a Dalit woman in 2020. Rahman was allowed to undergo heart surgery in AIIMS only after much campaigning and a court order, and yet was not allowed proper post-operative care. Today his left hand has been paralyzed and his family and lawyers are struggling to get him bail for further treatment.

Similarly, it is only very recently that 7 human rights organisations including Amnesty, had come out with a statement on the deteriorating condition of Dr G N Saibaba, who is suffering from multiple ailments such as a heart condition, a cyst in the brain, breathing problems and hypertension, most of which need specialist attention, which is not being provided by the jail authorities.

More importantly, it should be noted that the superintendent of Taloja prison, who delayed treatment to Vernon Gonsalves, is the same official who was in charge when Kanchan Nannavare who was arrested for Maoist links, died after a brain surgery, which was conducted on her, without informing her husband, who is also a political prisoner, lodged in a Pune prison.

In the Bhima Koregaon case too, Varavara Rao, famous Telugu poet and activist was also subject to inhuman treatment in jail where he was denied proper medical care in spite of his age and various, serious ailments. It was only last month that he could acquire a medical bail from the supreme court.

Other political prisoners in the Bhima Koregaon case, have also been systematically denied medical treatment. Last year, Dr Hany Babu, the 12th accused in the case, contracted an extremely serious eye infection after covid and his lawyers and family had to approach the courts to ensure proper treatment.

Even today, he suffers from blurred vision due to an increase in power, for which he needs to be checked, and the prison authorities have not yet allowed it.

Gautam Navlakha, prominent activist and journalist who was also arrested in the Bhima Koregaon case is also being denied proper checkups for his dental treatments, allergy attacks and skin rashes. More worryingly, Navlakha who is supposed to undergo colonoscopy every two years, has not been taken for the same, though he is at high risk for stomach cancer, due to family history and the presence of polyps in his colon. He was also denied his medical records in spite of a court order.

It is the primary responsibility of the state, the courts, and most importantly, the prison authorities, to take care of the health and life of the inmates who are under their custody. Yet, as per The National Crime Records Bureau, thousands of prisoners perish in Indian jails, with simple infections turning to septicemia and curable fevers leading to fatalities as in the case of Pandu Narote.

Various judgements in the higher courts of India, have time and again reiterated the fact that prisoners cannot be denied their fundamental rights just because they are imprisoned. In fact, in the prominent case of Parmanand Katara Vs Union of India (1989 AIR 2039), the Supreme Court had maintained that the state is obliged to take care of a prisoner’s life whether he is deemed guilty or innocent, as the per the right to health, which is a fundamental right given to all Indian citizens, in Article 21 of the constitution. In spite of this, the state and its prisons in India, are making a mockery of our constitution and courts, by acting in a most irresponsible manner, when it comes to the life and health of prisoners.

Today, our prisons are killing fields, where the poorest of the poor perish without prompt treatment and where prominent political prisoners have to move court for a right that is guaranteed to them by the constitution. We strongly condemn this state of affairs and demand that proper action for criminal negligence is taken against all those officials who are responsible for the death of prisoners in jail. We demand that compensations are provided for the families of such prisoners and we also demand action against those officials who are responsible for the death of Kanchan Nannaware, Father Stan Swamy and Pandu Narote.

We demand that the state immediately and urgently intervene in the functioning of prisons so as to ensure speedy treatment for all prisoners, thereby preventing complications and death. We also demand speedy treatment for political prisoners such as Dr G N Saibaba, Atikur Rahman, Gautham Navlakha and Dr Hany Babu.

Given that the overcrowding of prisons, and shortage of staff to provide escorts is one of the main reasons that is leading to such negligence regarding the health of prisoners, we demand that a mechanism is set in place for providing speedy bail to the undertrials who fill Indian prisons.

We also demand the immediate release of political prisoners who are languishing in jail as undertrials for years. If the state is incapable of guaranteeing their safety and security in prison, it would be better that the courts intervene to grant bail to these political prisoners, so that their precious lives are saved.

Susan Abraham (Vernon Gonsalves)
Jennifer Ferriera (Arun Ferriera)
Roy Wilson (Rona Wilson)
Pranali Parab (Ramesh Gaichor)
Minal Gadling (Surendra Gadling)
Rama Ambedkar (Anand Teltumbde)
Sahba Hussain (Gautam Navlakha)
Sharad Gaikwad (Sudhir Dhawle)
Monali Raut (Mahesh Raut)
Fr. Joe Xavier (Fr. Stan Swamy)
Dr. Jenny Rowena (Hany Babu)
Surekha Gorakhe (Sagar Gorkhe)