Despite Claims, Ahmedabad’s Slums See Regular Open Defecation, Manual Scavenging

Those living in Shankarbhuvan say the state government and local authorities treat them as invisible – and conveniently cover up their hardship when investors come to town.

Ahmedabad: “When VIPs pass our slum, they cover it up to hide our poverty,” said Tulsidas Vikrambhai, a resident of the slums in Ahmedabad’s Shankarbhuvan.

During the Tenth Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit which was held from January 10 to 12, 2024, the slums of Shankarbhuvan were curtained to hide the dilapidated conditions of living from investors who visited the capital.

In Ahmedabad’s Old City area as well, residents recall how every time VIP vehicular movement would occur over the flyover near them, their slum dwelling would be hidden with covers. But this doesn’t change the stench of their streets.

In this slum setting, where at least 400 homes sit in a bed of sewer that enters their dwellings, drainage water soiling their homes is just one of their problems.

AMC has installed various mobile toilets throughout Ahmedabad, but their upkeep is questionable. Photo: Tarushi Aswani

Futile facilities

In 2015, the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) declared that Ahmedabad was an “open defecation-free” (ODF) city. In January 2019, it was graded “ODF+” by the Union government, implying that the city had hygienic and usable public toilets. However, residents of Shankarbhuvan slum area told The Wire that their sanitation situation was far from what was advertised.

To cater to a population of at least a thousand slum dwellers, the AMC installed 30 toilets in the Shankarbhuvan slum. However, dwellers complain that due to the ramshackle condition of the toilets, they are forced to defecate openly.

According to the AMC, Ahmedabad has a total of 350 public toilets, community toilets and public urinals in the city. The ODF+ certificate states that almost all the 350 toilets and urinals met the ODF+ criteria.

Ramesh, a security guard for the site employed by the Corporation, was formerly engaged in cleaning the toilet stalls. “There are so many toilet stalls here, some don’t have drainage, some don’t have water supply, they are useless,” he said.

Another slum dweller, Sagarbhai Sinh, says that many like him have resorted to constructing toilets in their own homes since the ones installed by the AMC are simply unusable. But this too has its own repercussions. Sinh, a daily wager, explains how the makeshift toilets that they have constructed within their own homes are rendered inoperable when sewage drains overflow, pushing sewer into their dilapidated homes.

Overflowing sewerage lines in Shankarbhuvan reduce makeshift toilets to uselessness. Photo: Tarushi Aswani

Shehnaz Ansari, a member of the Human Development and Research Centre (HDRC), told The Wire that despite the AMC’s claims, 1,000+ people defecate in open. “This topples the government’s tall claims. The HDRC shared their findings of the survey conducted they conducted for two months in 2019. In February 2019, we surveyed 24 slum pockets across city and contacted 7,512 families,” she said.

Ansari also said that while some of the pockets had community toilets, even those did not have proper drainage or water networks. The toilets were not in a usable condition. She also shared that even after their 2019 survey, they continued to be in touch with people from Ahmedabad’s areas such as Lakshminagar Na Chhapra of Chandkheda locality, Ghoda camp, Asarva, and Keshvaninagar – here, residents still do not have hygienic and functional toilets.

Poverty and politics

Kailashben, 32, has been living in the Shankarbhuvan slum for 10 years now. Every morning at 5 am, she carries an empty, worn-out paint can, and walks to the outskirts of her slum, covering her face with the edge of her saree. Kailashben meets other women on her way; they have a common purpose, with one hand covering their face and the other carrying a tin can, they set out to defecate near the dysfunctional public toilets.

“Out of the 12 stalls here, only one is usable. Not that it has facilities, but it has less trash and relieving oneself there is manageable. When that one stall is occupied, we are forced to defecate behind these stalls,” Kailashben told The Wire.

Open defecation is the only resort left for slum dwellers in Ahmedabad. Photo: Tarushi Aswani

Bhoomi, who recently turned 18, is dismayed by the situation. “I am forced to squat and urinate if I want to use the one stall that is available. It is humiliating to defecate in public, having to ask fellow women to cover you while you relieve yourself. For every woman here, menstruation is an added ordeal, physically, mentally and financially,” Bhoomi said.

“I am ashamed sometimes when I defecate openly, and sometimes scared too. What if someone sees me unclothed? But I have no choice,” said Bhoomi. Women like Kailashben and Bhoomi discussed how installing toilets doesn’t end the AMC’s role. “They should also ensure that toilets are functional, sometimes even the water tank outside the stalls runs dry. It leaves us helpless,” said Kesudaben, a 50-year-old slum resident.

Some local women also shared how they are forced to also take cover under the flyover near the slum to avoid eve-teasing incidents when they head for defecation.

Mahendra Tulsibhai Bariya, a daily wager, was eager to talk to The Wire during the field visit. His idea was to somehow make the AMC let go of their apathy towards the slum dwellers. Bariya, a father of five, claims that the AMC people visited their slum over time but there was no change. “Sab bolte hain Vikas, Swacchta, Viksit Gujarat. Humari koi nahi sunnta, sarkar humare saath nahi hai, sarkar humko maarne chali hai (Gujarat is celebrated for being developed, clean, advance. But nobody listens to us, nobody supports us. The government is out to kill us),” Bariya lamented.

Bariya also shared how whenever locals from the slum visited the Corporation office, they are shooed off and told that their slum had been sold off to private builders. “Vote maangne sab aate hain, gareeb ke paas bhi, but Gujarat mein gareeb ki kya sunnvaai hai (When it’s time to ask for votes everyone appears, even in front of the poor. But who in Gujarat will listen to what the poor need)?” he asked.

Countering claims

On January 2, a Valmiki sanitation workers was lowered into a sewerage line without protective gear at 12:30 am. Photo: MGT

On January 2, at around 12:30 am, in eastern Ahmedabad’s Bapu Nagar ward, a Dalit man was lowered into a 22-feet-deep gutter. The man, who was in fact a sanitation worker, was lowered into the sewage gutter without protective gear at midnight by a private company hired to clean the line. Others at the scene told The Wire that Bali Boy India, a private company, was behind this episode of manual scavenging.

While India prohibited the act of manual scavenging in 1993, the legal scope of the task of manual scavenging was expanded over the years to include the manual cleaning of drains, sewer and septic tanks.

On October 2, 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had declared that India had become an open defecation free country as a result of his ‘Swachch Bharat Abhiyan’ at a glittering event held in the Harijan Ashram, Sabarmati in Ahmedabad. Yet, over 1,200 families belonging to the Valmiki community living in the city continue to be forced to resort to the practice.

Parsottam Vaghela, president of the Manav Garima Trust (MGT), an NGO striving for the rights of the Valmiki community, has consistently tracked the debilitating state of facilities for the community.

Since 2013, when the 1993 law banning manual scavenging was amended, Vaghela’s MGT has tracked that at least 105 sanitation workers have died while cleaning septic tanks and sewerage systems in Gujarat.

“Due to systemic oppression and the poverty that comes with it, the community has internalised this occupation. Though the law prohibits lowering of any human being into such hazardous tanks and sewerage, these incidents still take place,” Vaghela explained.

Vaghela also shared that the sanitation workers are not only subjected to unsafe conditions but also are not given access to safety gear such as masks, safety boots and face covers.

He highlighted that from March 22 to April 26, 2023 – in one month alone – as many as eight people died while cleaning sewers in various parts of the Gujarat.

Vaghela, who regularly keeps track of the situation of open defecation, said that despite the AMC’s claims, at least 200 sites in Ahmedabad are not free of open defecation.

“Areas such as Shankarbhuvan, Shahpur, Mirzapur, Narol, Vatva, Juna Vadaj, Shahwadi, Nagorivad still see people defecating in public, where slum-dwellers defecate in the open, and sanitation workers manually clean it up. Despite these ground realities, which we have brought to the government’s notice time and again, AMC claims Ahmedabad is OD free,” he told The Wire.

India @ 75: It’s Time To Take Stock of Promises that Modi Said Would Be Achieved by 2022

As the government readies for ‘Amrit Kaal’, the citizens deserve to know if the promised ‘ache din’ and ‘New India’ are finally here.

August 15, 2022, is a momentous day for India as it completes 75 years of independence. It is also the promised day.

The Modi government had officially chosen 2022 as the year to usher in ‘New India’, and had set some modest targets for itself. As the government readies for ‘Amrit Kaal’, the citizens deserve to know if the promised ache din and ‘New India’ are finally here.

Speaking at a rally in 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had promised to double farmer incomes by 2022. Latest government data paints a sorry picture. Farmers are earning Rs 27/day from cultivation. Double incomes would have required continuous double-digit growth. However, the growth clocked in the past years has been 2.8%. The frustration with low incomes fuelled the biggest farmers’ agitation in history when the government enacted three anti-farm legislations by stealth.

Speaking at an event in 2018, Prime Minister Modi said, “By 2022, my government will ensure that everyone has a house.” A noble promise that has not been kept. PM Awas Yojana (Urban) dashboard tells us that over 60 lakh sanctioned houses (50% of the target) are yet to be completed.

Back in 2014, the prime minister was quoted as saying, “By 2022, we should do one task. There should be nobody in the country who does not have a house with water, electricity, toilet. This is the minimum task we should do.”

By all accounts, the ‘minimum task’ has not been achieved.

Electricity to every household sounds insincere when we read news of the President’s ancestral village getting electricity only after her nomination in June this year. Similar results appear for the ‘water-and-toilets-in-every-house’ promise.

The Jal Shakti ministry, in a reply to a question in Rajya Sabha, informed that less than 52% rural households have tap water supply. Things get worse. Another reply by the ministry shows that 80% Indians are likely consuming ‘poisonous’ water.

Every village may have been declared open defecation free but the reality is starkly different. A 2021 survey by South Asian Labour Network found that 45% of India’s population is still defecating in the open. Over 12 lakh toilets have been constructed (on paper) but do not exist.

In 2018, the prime minister launched the POSHAN Abhiyan and targeted making India malnutrition-free by 2022. The National Family Health Survey-5 (2019-21) shows malnutrition is rampant and there has been only marginal improvement nationally. In fact, 13 states have reported an increase in stunting. There has been a sharp increase in prevalence of anaemia amongst infants and women, rising by 14.5% and 7.5%, respectively. The Global Hunger Index ranks India 101 of 116 countries, behind our neighbours Sri Lanka, Nepal, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.

The government has failed at achieving a single meaningful welfare-oriented target.

The promise of starting the bullet train between Ahmedabad and Mumbai on August 15 this year has come a cropper. A severely delayed project of national importance has raised eyebrows. Equally worrying is the non-completion of the Bharatmala Pariyojana. The highway construction project was supposed to be completed by this year. Less than one-fourth target has been met and a new deadline of 2028 has been set.

Infrastructure development has been a priority agenda of this government. The failure to meet the above-mentioned targets will rankle the government’s supporters.

Prime Minister Modi launched the Make in India programme in 2014 with great fanfare. The programme has three key objectives: 1) increasing manufacturing growth to 12-14%, 2) increasing the share of manufacturing in GDP from 16 to 25% by 2022, and 3) creating 10 crore jobs in manufacturing by 2022.

The manufacturing growth rate has averaged 6% over the last eight years, the share of manufacturing in the GDP has stagnated at 16%, and manufacturing jobs have been reduced by half.

NITI Aayog’s ‘Strategy for New India @ 75’ laid down some ‘clearly stated objectives’ for the government. One was GDP growth rate of 9-10% by 2022. Despite the low base due to the massive contraction in 2020-21, the government has failed to achieve a 9% growth rate. Per capita incomes are down to the 2019 levels.

There are several other promises that remain unfulfilled. The non-performance is secular. There are no houses for all, no electricity in every house, farmer incomes have not doubled, or even improved substantially, the bullet train is not operational, ‘Make in India’ has not helped domestic manufacturers or job seekers in a significant way, Bharatmala has been pushed to 2028, and economic growth is uncertain.

It is said that Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had the following lines scribbled in a notepad on his bedside:

The woods are lovely, dark and deep,

But I have promises to keep,

And miles to go before I sleep,

And miles to go before I sleep.

With ache din and ‘New India’ not living up to the promise, there’s miles to go for this government to gain any credibility. It is time they take a leaf out of Nehru’s notepad and keep the poem close.

Akash Satyawali is national coordinator at the research department, All India Congress Committee.

NFHS-5 Data Can Help India Become a Truly Open Defecation Free Country

The data shows that it is essential to measure the success of sanitation interventions on adoption, rather than access as representative of the true state of the scenario.

India released the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-21) data on November 24, 2021. Given the independent, high quality, and national as well as sub-national representation of the sanitation data collected in this survey, one can assess the impact of the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) on India’s sanitation status and the validity of India’s open defecation free (ODF) status. To answer these, we refer to one indicator reported in the state factsheets: population living in households that use an improved sanitation facility. 

In figure 1, we see that at the all-India level, there is remarkable progress in the use of improved sanitation facilities from 49% in NFHS-4 (2015-16) to 70% in NFHS-5 (2019-2021). Since the period between the two surveys coincides with the duration of the SBM (2014-2019), this improvement can be largely attributed to SBM. At the end of the SBM, based on the number of toilets built by the government, India was declared an ODF nation. This implied that all the households had access to toilets.

Figure 1: Percentage of population living in households that use improved sanitation in India.

However, NFHS-5 informs us that while many states are on the path of achieving the ODF status, India cannot yet be claimed as an ODF country. States and UTs like Ladakh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha still have only 42-60% of the population living in households that use improved sanitation facilities. Similarly, besides Kerala and Lakshadweep, every state needs significant improvement in the use of toilets to reach ODF status. For the future, it is essential to measure the success of sanitation interventions on adoption, rather than access, because it represents the true state of sanitation across a country.

The figure also informs us that there is heterogenous progress and prevalence of rural and urban sanitation. Rural sanitation improved from 37% to 65%, while urban improved from 70% to 82% from NFHS-4 to NFHS-5. Rural India needs to bridge the gap of 35%, while urban India 18% to achieve ODF status. This differentiated progress calls for a differentiated approach to success.

Future national sanitation schemes need to address the challenge of stubborn social norms in rural India which lead to the preference for open defecation even in the presence of toilets. Hence, allocation of funds to programs like behaviour change communication (BCC), that can inform the communities about the harms of open defecation and benefits of toilets, will be necessary to upend the practice.

Also Read: Here’s Why India Is Struggling to Be Truly Open Defecation Free

The issues for urban sanitation are different. Here, the challenge is not the BCC aspect but managing the solid and liquid waste (SLW) generated from the higher use of toilets. India is the world’s third-largest generator of solid waste in the world and its management is riddled with sub-optimal collection and disposal as well as limited state funding. Unlike the rural areas, where a twin-pit (no sewage connection required) toilet is built under SBM, new toilets in urban areas need a connection to existing sewage systems. Better management of this system, along with the upgradation of the sewage system after every few decades will encourage more people to install and adopt toilets. 

However, it is also important to interpret these statistics with caution. For example, respondents are asked to report the place where the household members usually defecate. The response of one member of the household is extrapolated to generate the sanitation practice of the household or the population living in the household. Given that the research has shown heterogeneity in the use of toilets – adults use it more than children, women more than men – the survey might systematically undermine the presence of open defecation in the nation. We call for a more comprehensive assessment of sanitation practices in the future. 

India has a long way to go before achieving universal sanitation. NFHS-5 can play a vital role in reaching that target. NFHS-5 is government sourced, and representative at the district, state and national levels. This can help the authorities identify target locations for intervention. For instance, at the state-level much improvement is needed in Ladakh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha and Manipur. At the district level, 411 out of 707 districts have more than 70% of the population living in households that are using an improved source of sanitation. Focusing rigorous application of sanitation programs in the remaining districts will be beneficial.

Similarly, rural areas will require a differentiated approach from urban areas. Recognition of these diverse challenges and the use of NFHS-5 data to precisely identify the places that need sanitation intervention will help India achieve the goal of becoming an ODF nation. 

Payal Seth is an economics researcher at Tata-Cornell Institute, Cornell University and a PhD Scholar at Bennett University and  Palakh Jain is an associate professor at Bennett University.

Here’s Why India Is Struggling to Be Truly Open Defecation Free 

Why is it that even with an increase in households with improved sanitation conditions, India is not meeting its ODF expectations? 

India built over 9.5 crore toilets across the country and was declared Open Defecation Free (ODF) in October, 2019. Three years later, a walk in the village, Bargadia in Uttar Pradesh shows a different reality. 

“We have been defecating in the open for many years, it has become more of a habit now. Toilets constructed in households are mostly left unused. We tried using it but the sludge flows through drains, which are located right in front of our house. It is a 10-15 minute walk to the jungle where we find it is safe to openly defecate”, says Vandana Kumari, a resident of the village. 

To understand this gap between toilet coverage and usage in India, data from the fifth National Family Health Survey is presented here. It provides information on the health and nutrition indicators of 17 states and five Union Territories in India.

Figure 1 analyses progress for states over the years by comparing data from NFHS 4 (2015-2016) and NFHS 5 (2019-2020). It shows the change in percentage of population living in households with improved sanitation. Except Sikkim, which shows a 2.4% decline, an increase in this percentage can be seen across all other states.

In average across India, improved sanitation increased by 18 percentage points.  

 

However, data from NFHS 5 shows a disconnect between the percentage of people living with sanitation facilities and the ODF status of these 22 states and Union Territories. Ladakh and Bihar are more than 50 percentage points lower than their 100% ODF status. This is followed by Manipur (35.1), West Bengal (32), Assam (31.4) and so on, as observed in Figure 2.

Also read: Is Bihar Really Open Defecation Free? Not a Single Village Was Verified Twice

Lakshadweep and Kerala are the only two states which are less than 2 percentage points close to achieving the target of 100% ODF. 

So, why is it that with an increase in households with improved sanitation conditions, India is not meeting its ODF expectations? 

What explains this gap? 

For many, it is preference rather than compulsion. Many do not want to live close to human waste and think that it makes their homes impure – an idea which is inconsistent with their regular notions of cleanliness and purity. Affordable latrines require cleaning to take place manually, so households want to connect their toilets to a large tank. This helps avoid the task of emptying and cleaning the tank – a task that ‘upper’ castes perceive is meant for Dalits.

Beliefs in ritual purity and untouchability have not just prevented rural India to access toilets but has also led to lack of proper maintenance of these facilities. Thus, rather than just financial constraints, issues of casteism act as barriers towards making India open defecation free. 

Many scholars have analysed open defecation practices according to the Hindu caste system – a ritual avoidance of excreta. A study conducted by Dean Spears and Michael Geruso suggested that Hindus are far less likely to use toilets than Muslims in India. The difference in demand by Hindus and Muslims was seen across all levels of wealth. These findings were significant at the 5% level. Furthermore, Hindus were more likely to respond that defecating far away from home is considered pure. This also explains the Muslim mortality paradox, according to which, more Hindu children than Muslims are unable to make it to their fifth birthday. This is despite Muslims being a disadvantaged minority in India. 

Another factor that explains the gap in the ODF status is the method in which different types of toilets function in rural India.

The United Nations Children’s Fund has recognised three types of toilets – single pit, twin pit and septic tank toilets. The septic tank toilets have drains that connect the toilet to the tank located nearby. The sludge flows through the drain pipes and then gets accumulated in the tanks. The usage of these septic tanks has been considered to be highly problematic as the sludge flows through drains that are mostly located near their houses. Thus, the risk of getting exposed to fecal germs and bacteria is even higher than the risk one faces by defecating openly. 

Also read: Declaring India ‘Open Defecation Free’ Doesn’t Mean Sanitation Goals Have Been Met

The government has, meanwhile, also introduced ODF+ and ODF++, strengthening the overall ODF mandate of the Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM). The conditions for ODF+ is that an area, city, ward or work circle should be open defecation free as well as ensure that the public and community toilets are functional and well-maintained. Moving a step further, conditions to receive the ODF++ status call for efficient maintenance of the toilet facilities along with safe treatment and management of fecal sludge and sewage. Under this, no discharge of untreated fecal septage in open areas, drains and water bodies needs to be ensured. 

With the current state of things, it is challenging to impose these conditions which is why only seven cities in India have received the status of being ODF++.

Representative image. Photo: Reuters

Many areas struggle to keep the ODF status intact once achieved, owing to seasonal and technological obstructions. Households struggle to maintain toilets in areas susceptible to seasonal floods as these facilities get flooded or sometimes even overflow.

The challenge of maintaining the ODF status is also seen in villages which are drought prone. Here, households receive a limited amount of water, which they choose to prioritise for other activities such as drinking and washing as opposed to using in toilets. Thus, seasonal challenges create hurdles for states to maintain the status of being open defecation free. 

 The Asian enigma

Child height is considered to have a strong connection to lifelong implications for health and human capital. Out of the 149 million children who are stunted worldwide, India has one third of them. Data from NFHS 5 shows that this number has further increased over the last four years. One out of every 5 children in the country has stunted growth. 

Open defecation explains the enigma of child height in the country. Indian children are shorter on average than children in Sub Saharan Africa, despite Indians being richer on average. 

It is interesting to note that gaps in height-for-age are not captured by differences in the incomes of the countries alone and open defecation provides an answer to this paradox. In a study conducted by Dean Spears, much or all of the average height-for-age difference in Sub Saharan Africa and India can be statistically attributed to open defecation.

Then why is it that child stunting is seen as a common phenomenon even among those who access toilet facilities? The 2005 Demographic Health Survey (DHS) suggests that even the top 2.5% of the wealthy children are shorter than the ‘healthy growth norms’. 

Also read: NSO Report Reveals Rural India Is Not Open Defecation Free Yet

Open defecation has become a classic example of a negative spillover. This is primarily because these children too are exposed to the fecal germs that come from others practicing open defecation. The problem then becomes worse for India due to its high population density, with 403.4 people per square kilometre. 

Policy recommendations

In a country as diverse as India, a one dimensional solution is not going to solve an issue that is highly driven by social norms. Open defecation in India is largely a behavioural issue which is exacerbated by structural challenges. Its effects extend to adverse health outcomes, especially in children. Clearly, there is much scope of increasing efficiency under the Swachh Bharat Mission. 

There remains an urgent need to weave in cultural parameters into policies that aim to eradicate open defecation. Simply constructing toilets is not enough anymore. The  government needs to stress more on effective communication to induce change as well as focus on the differential usage and access to these facilities. 

Only 3% of the SBM budget is allocated to behavioural modification. An increased focus on behavioural change seems to be the key solution to make the objectives of the Swachh Bharat Mission more effective. Furthermore, caste and cultural biases need to be noted as key parameters that perpetuate the practice of open defecation. 

Lastly, the casteist bias of requiring large tanks as opposed to pit latrines in rural areas must be taken into consideration while advancing progress of the Swachh Bharat Mission. 

Ananya Sharma is a Teaching Fellow at Ashoka University, India. Her key interests lie in health and development economics. 

In Addressing Sanitation Woes, India Needs Separate Approaches for Rural, Urban Areas

In order to end open defecation by 2030, and thereby achieve the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal of 100% access to adequate and equitable sanitation, India needs to consider separately its urban and rural realities.

India has made remarkable progress on several economic fronts since independence in 1947. While the data suggests that there has been a significant rise in literacy, per capita income and life expectancy, India still hosts the highest number of malnourished children in the world. Recent research has established that water and sanitation issues are the most crucial determinants of child health.

While the national sanitation campaigns have been launched since the 1980s with the goal of increasing sanitation coverage, the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.2 of achieving 100% access to adequate and equitable sanitation, and ending open defecation by 2030, remains elusive. This trend is exhibited in the recently released government’s NFHS-5 data.

No surveyed state has achieved 100% use of adequate sanitation (see figure 1). Ladakh and Bihar have to achieve more than 50 percentage points use to reach the SDG 6.2 goal, whereas other states have to increase adequate sanitation use by 10-35 percentage points. Mizoram, Kerala and Lakshadweep are the only three states close to achieving the target of 100% by 2030.

Also read: Claiming That Rural India is ‘Open Defecation Free’ Is Blatant Exaggeration

We now ask an important question: what could be done over the next decade to ensure that India achieves SDG 6.2? The first step would be recognising that nearly 65% of India’s population lives in rural areas, and this implies combatting different sanitation challenges for rural and urban India.

We explore these distinct challenges and the root cause behind the existence of such differences. A deeper recognition and understanding of the rural and urban sanitation challenges will help the Indian policymakers restructure future national sanitation policies distinctly for each area. This can help India achieve the SDG 6.2 target.

Figure 1: Percentage of population living in households that use improved sanitation in India.

Differentiated progress in rural and urban sanitation

Before we delve into specific rural and urban challenges, it is important to understand the sanitation differences (if any) between the two.

NFHS-5 reported significant differences in the proportion of households using adequate sanitation between the rural and the urban areas in states across India. Ladakh had the highest gap within the two regions as the proportion of households in the rural areas had almost 40% lower use of toilets than the households in the urban areas. The highest disparity in Ladakh was followed by Gujarat, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and so on (see figure 2).

Rural sanitation has lagged behind urban sanitation in almost all states for decades. The only exceptions are north-eastern states like Meghalaya, Sikkim, Manipur and Nagaland, which exhibit an opposite trend as rural households have higher use of sanitation facilities than their urban counterparts.

Figure 2: Percentage of population living in rural and urban households that use improved sanitation in India.

Differences in rural and urban sanitation issues

At the launch of the Swachh Bharath Mission (SBM) in 2014, the most important challenge in rural areas was to overcome the problem of open defecation by increasing households’ access to toilets. Eventually, it was found that these toilets were unused because there was a preference for open defecation (OD), i.e., people preferred to practice OD despite the access to toilets. This preference was driven by the low quality of toilets, social norms and the general belief that OD is healthier than toilets.

Hence, to enhance the adoption of these toilets, SBM rural also allocated funds for information, education and communication (IEC) activities which would induce behavioural change among the rural population. It is important to note that the toilets built under SBM rural were pit latrines, i.e., the household did not need to be connected with a sewage system.

The issues become complex as we discuss urban areas as the most prominent sanitation challenge in urban areas is managing solid and liquid waste (SLW). India is the third-largest generator of solid waste in the world (next to the US and China). Of this, only 70% is collected, and 80% of this collected waste is simply dumped in the landfills. The untreated waste seeps into land, water or is burned – leading to air, water and land pollution. The task of managing the collection and transportation of solid waste falls under the state municipalities. This strains the already limited state funding, deterring the acquisition of new landfills and investment in innovative technology for better SLW management.

Similarly, the management of liquid waste (think fecal sludge) is under the combined authority of the state’s public health departments and municipalities. Unlike the rural areas, it is not possible to build in-house pits for every urban household due to the scarce land and rising population. Hence, the construction of new toilets under SBM has to be followed by building or connecting these toilets to an existing underground sewage system. To avoid the excessive burden, an upgradation of such systems is recommended every few decades.

Why do these differences exist?

The divergence in the sanitation challenges arises due to multiple reasons. Historically, urban areas always have had higher access to sanitation facilities than rural areas. This led to a higher number of people using these facilities in the urban than the rural areas. Hence using toilets in urban areas eventually evolved as a social norm. However, given the historically limited access to toilets in rural areas, open defecation became the prevailing norm.

Also read: Declaring India ‘Open Defecation Free’ Doesn’t Mean Sanitation Goals Have Been Met

What has triggered this traditional establishment of social norms in the two areas? The important complementarities between water and sanitation suggest that it is easier to access piped water in urban areas. Flushing requires nearly 0.5 to 1 bucket of water. While this process becomes easier when the toilets are connected to the piped water (as is the case in urban areas), OD is easier to practice in rural areas. OD requires a mug of water and saves the rural households the toiling task of filling and carrying buckets of water from a central place in the village to their homes.

To summarise, while the rural areas face the challenge of pervasive OD, the urban areas have to cope with the rising solid and liquid waste. Both areas require different sanitation solutions as well: behaviour change communication to make the community aware of the ills of OD for the former, while better management of generated solid waste and fecal sludge in the urban areas.

Besides behaviour change, exploring innovative cost-effective waterless sanitation technologies will also prove beneficial for the rural areas as it will save them from the hassle of worrying about the water aspect of sanitation.

Although India has a long way to go before universal sanitation is achieved in both the rural and urban areas, recognition of the disparate challenges faced by both regions will play an instrumental role in making India an open defecation-free country.

Payal Seth is a consultant at Tata-Cornell Institute, Cornell University and a Ph.D. Scholar at Bennett University. Palakh Jain is an Assistant Professor at Bennett University. 

Is Bihar Really Open Defecation Free? Not a Single Village Was Verified Twice

Moreover, as per the Swachh Bharat Mission data, toilets built in 1,374 villages in Bihar have not been verified even once.

New Delhi: Polling has been concluded for the first phase of the Bihar’s assembly elections. The second and third phases of polling for the remaining constituencies are scheduled to be held on November 3 and November 7 respectively.

Meanwhile, the election campaign has heated up, with opposition leaders highlighting the incumbent government’s failures, on one hand, and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Janata Dal United (JDU) making tall claims about developmental work in the state during the last 15 years, on the other. On both sides, poll promises abound.

The BJP and the JDU are primarily harping on rural electrification, piped supply of drinking water, public toilets, etc. as achievements of their governance. The incumbent JD(U) government in Bihar had launched the Saat Nishchay, or Seven Resolves, programme in 2015, under which development work on drinking water, public toilets, women’s empowerment, etc. was undertaken. Terming the earlier programme a success, the Nitish government has announced a follow-up scheme, called Saat Nishchay Part 2.

The BJP leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, are also boasting of the Centre’s policies in order to woo the electorate. But have these policies, in fact, been properly implemented at the ground level, or are the claims it merely hyperbole?

In this regard, government data presents an extremely worrisome picture.

In this report, The Wire analyses the implementation of one of Nitish Kumar’s seven resolves, ‘Construction of Toilets’ along with Modi’s ambitious ‘Swachh Bharat Abhiyan’ in Bihar.

Also read: Bihar Piped Water Scheme: Only 14% Work Completed in Rural Areas

A toilet for every house

In order to fulfil the state government’s ‘Shauchalya Nirman, Ghar Ka Samman’ resolve, schemes are being implemented under the ‘Lohiya Swachh Bihar Abhiyan (LSBA)’ by the Rural Development Department in rural areas and Urban Development and Housing Department in urban areas of the state.

The campaign was launched with the aim of making rural areas of the state open defecation free (ODF) and was to be implemented keeping in mind the provisions of the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural) in the Centre and LSBA in the state.

Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Swachh Bharat, open defecation, Gandhi Jayanti, sanitation, toilets, manual scavenging, Chennai water shortage, Marathwada, Patna floods, drought, monsoon rain, India Meteorological Department, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Nainital Lake, urban flooding,

Photo: Sharada Prasad CS/Flickr, CC BY 2.0

While according to figures by the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural), the entire rural India, including Bihar, has been declared open defecation free, a look at the number of verified toilets casts doubt on the government’s misleading claims.

Several recently published reports have challenged the government’s claim and have offered evidence that the toilets are either in a dilapidated condition or incomplete, while many people are still forced to defecate in the open. In some cases, the facilities are being used for other purposes.

The situation is no better in Nitish Kumar’s home turf, Nalanda.

In order to tackle the problem and ensure the construction of toilets, the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation under the Union Ministry of Water Resources issued guidelines on September 3, 2015. According to these guidelines, at least two verifications may be carried out after self-declaration of achievement of ODF status by any village or Gram Sabha.

“The first verification may be carried out within three months of the declaration to verify the ODF status. Thereafter, in order to ensure sustainability of ODF, one more verification may be carried out after around six months of first verification,” it stated.

The ministry said that the achievement of ODF status is not a one-time process, at least two verifications need to be carried out. The Bihar government’s guidelines also state that the physical verification of constructed toilets should be undertaken within ten days of receipt of the application.

Swachh Bharat Mission(G)-Bihar by The Wire

However, according to the Swachh Bharat Mission data, toilets built in 1,374 villages of Bihar have not been verified even once. There are a total of 38,691 villages in the state, out of which 37,317 villages have been verified once under the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural).

Also read: Interview | There’s No Greater Terror Than Unemployment: Tejashwi Yadav

Surprisingly, toilet construction in any village in Bihar has not been verified a second time, highlighting discrepancies in the Centre’s claims that India is free of the problem.

Apart from Bihar, toilets built in the villages of Chandigarh, Goa, Jammu and Kashmir, Karnataka, Lakshadweep, Maharashtra, Manipur, Nagaland, Odisha, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu have also not undergone a second verification.

Looking at the national average, it appears that while almost all the villages declared ODF in the country under Swachh Bharat Mission – Rural have been verified once, a second verification has been carried out in only 30% cases.

According to Swachh Bharat Mission data, out of 730 ODF villages in Bihar’s Araria district, the status of 21 villages has not been verified even once. Similarly, out of 1610 villages in the Banka district, 346 villages have not been verified at all.

Out of 825 villages in Buxar district, 158 villages have not been verified even once. Similarly, five villages in Gopalganj, 10 in Katihar, 46 in Khagadia, 23 in Lakhsarai and 20 in Madhepura have not been verified even once for their ‘open defecation free’ status.

If we look at other districts, toilet construction has not been verified even once in 202 villages out of 1,007 villages in Madhubani. Similarly, no verification has been done for 18 villages in Muzaffarpur, 90 in Nalanda, four in Saharsa, 10 in Sasaram (Rohtas) and 22 villages in Vaishali district after the villages declared themselves to be open defecation free.

Out of 1,111 villages in Purnia district, no verification of toilets under Swachh Bharat Mission has been done in 399 villages.

ODF status in the Ganga catchment area

Together under the Ganga Action Plan (Namami Gange) and the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural), 307 panchayat areas in 61 blocks of 12 districts in the state, namely Begusarai, Bhagalpur, Bhojpur, Buxar, Katihar, Khagaria, Lakhisarai, Munger, Patna, Samastipur, Saran and Vaishali – located along the Ganga were to be rendered ODF.

Although all 761 villages in these districts have been declared open defecation free, only 742 villages have been verified once. It includes 472 villages situated along the Ganga.

Also read: Does Bihar’s ‘Good’ COVID-19 Data Reflect a Well-Managed Epidemic or Poor Detection?

None of these villages has been verified the second time even though second verification has been carried out for villages declared open defecation free in other states on the banks of the Ganga, including Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and West Bengal.

Some 250,000 of India’s 649,481 villages have been declared open defecation free. Credit: Reuters

Representative image. Photo: Reuters

Photographs of only 80% of the toilets uploaded

According to the Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation of the Ministry of Water Resources, a total of 1.2 crore toilets have been constructed in Bihar under the Swachh Bharat Mission – Rural since October 2, 2014.

Of these, 2.98 lakh toilets have been constructed in the year 2019-20. However, photographs of about 22 lakh or 19% of the toilets have not been uploaded, which raises questions about the reliability of these figures.

In Bihar,

of the toilets built during 2019-20, the photos of about 20,000 toilets have not been uploaded.

The national average for uploading photographs of toilet construction is 94.65%. In comparison, Bihar lags far behind having uploaded photos of only 81% of the toilets built.

In the light of these figures, the state government’s claim that the state has been rendered open defecation free is a glaring overstatement.

What is Saat Nishchay Part-2?

Following the purported ‘success’ of Saat Nishchay, a subsequent Saat Nishchay Part-2 programme was recently announced. The second phase of the programme focuses on training the youth, women’s empowerment, irrigation and agriculture, cleanliness, infrastructure, connectivity and health facilities.

Nitish Kumar is facing flak for his mismanagement of the COVID-19-induced lockdown, as well as for the failure of his government to provide transportation facilities to migrant labourers during the lockdown, increasing rate of unemployment in the state, deteriorating healthcare system and the devastation caused by recurring floods.

Also read: Watch | At Patna’s Labour Chowk, Workers Say Revival of Their Livelihoods Is Not a Poll Issue

In a report published earlier, The Wire analysed the implementation of Nitish Kumar’s other two resolves, the Clean Drinking Water Scheme and the Nali-Gali Yojana for drainage and by-lanes, pointing out how only 14% work under the Mukhyamantri Gramin Paijal Nishchay Yojana, – for the piped supply of clean drinking water in rural households – has been completed and less than half of the budget has been utilised.

Apart from this, only 42% of the projects assigned under the Mukhyamatri Gramin Gali-Naali Nishchay for pucca bylanes and drainage in rural areas have been completed.

Translated from Hindi by Naushin Rehman. Read the Hindi original here.

NSO Report Reveals Rural India Is Not Open Defecation Free Yet

A government report has called into question the authenticity of the Swacch Bharat mission database which asserts that rural India has achieved 100% toilet coverage.

New Delhi: On October 2, 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that rural India was open defecation free, implying that every household now had access to a toilet. The claim was based on the Swachh Bharat mission database which showed that rural India had achieved 100% toilet coverage.

But, a government report has now called into question the authenticity of this database. According to the National Statistical Office’s (NSO) ‘Drinking Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Housing Condition in India’ report, 29% of rural households and 4% of urban households do not have access to toilets.

The survey’s reference point is October 2018. At that time, according to the Swachh Bharat Mission database, 95% of households in the country had access to toilets and 25 states and union territories had been declared open defecation free. But, the survey contradicts this data as it has found that only 71% of households had access to a toilet at around the same time.

The survey has found households lacking toilets even in states which had been declared open defecation free prior to the survey.

For instance, Andhra Pradesh was declared open defecation free in June 2018. But, the NSO survey found that 22% of surveyed households do not have access to a toilet.

Maharashtra which was declared open defecation free in April 2018, was also found to be lacking toilets. According to the NSO, 22% households lacked access to toilets.

Gujarat was declared open defecation free in October 2017. But the survey reported that 24% of households did not have access to toilets in the state.

Also read: Government Data Proves We Shouldn’t Believe India Is ‘Open Defecation Free’

Last year, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) had also raised questions about the Gujarat government’s claim about the state being open defecation free. A survey that it conducted in 8 districts, found that 30% of households did not have access to toilets.

Now, according to the survey, Odisha, Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand are the worst-performing states with 50%, 48% and 41% households respectively not having any access to a toilet.

The report is based on a survey of around 9,000 households across the country which was conducted last year between July and December.

According to the Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen) database, more than 10 crore toilets have been built in the country since October 2, 2014, when the scheme was launched.

The government has claimed that every household in rural India now has access to a toilet. But, according to the NSO survey, only 63% of households has access to a toilet which is for their exclusive use.

The survey also found that only 17% of rural households received benefits for building toilets. Under the Swachh Bharat Mission, all households who build a toilet receive financial benefits.

Business Standard has also reported that the data sets presented in the NSO’s report were the cause of a ‘disagreement’ between the statistical body and the government which led to a six-month delay in its publication.

In one of the meetings, the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation had allegedly said that the survey findings, with regards to the proportion of households with access to a toilet, ‘was on the lower side’ and needed to be re-examined.

Also read: Six Charts Show That India Is Not Yet Open Defecation Free

The ministry also said that the data for the proportion of households which did not receive benefits under the sanitary schemes ‘was on the higher side’.

Now, the NSO data has once again put the government’s claim, that rural India is open defecation free, under the spotlight. The claim is based on its SBM database. The Wire has reported in the past that this database is not exactly trustworthy.

For one, a village can be shown to be open defecation free in the database based on an unverified claim on paper by the village pradhan. The levels of verification that are needed as per the SBM guidelines were not necessarily followed in the rush to declare India open defecation free.

It was also found that as the date that India was supposed to be declared ODF approached, large numbers of villages were declared and verified open defecation free.

For instance, in the four days leading up to October 2, Odisha verified more villages than it had done in the whole of 2018-19.

The Wire also found that targets in UP were lowered so that they would become more achievable.

 #Grit is an initiative of The Wire dedicated to the coverage of manual scavenging and sanitation and their linkages with caste, gender, policy and apathy. 

How an IAS Aspirant Brought Home a Toilet Revolution to This Tamil Nadu Village

After 43 years, Vanjivakkam is finally 100% open-defecation free. So, what does it take to transform a community?

Every single day, Vanmathi had to wake up at 4:30 am and walk for an hour to relieve herself. The 19-year-old engineering student is now happy that she gets a few extra hours to sleep before college. Yes, they finally have a toilet in her house at Vanjivakkam in Thiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu.

There are Vanmathi’s aplenty in this village, which is a mere 50 km from the cosmopolitan city of Chennai. From braving rains to snakebites, the villagers have had to undergo troubles aplenty due to the lack of basic toilet facilities. But last year, all of that changed as Vanjivakkam turned open-defecation free after 43 years of existence. The villagers unanimously point to Ashok Priyadarshan (40) as the man who made it possible. Here’s how a complete stranger took on the challenge of bringing a toilet to every single home in this village, within a year.

Back in 2013, Priyadarshan was studying hard to crack the civil service exams. He was simultaneously coaching students from economically weaker sections in his neighbourhood in Chennai. Having met few students from Vanjivakkam at a local science event, he volunteered to teach them during weekends.

On his first visit, he was shocked to see the dismal state of the village, which lacked basic facilities like toilets, buses etc. What was initially a weekend volunteering activity to tutor children slowly turned into a full-time responsibility. He became the go-to guy in the village to help residents understand government schemes and benefits.

“Our students who were previously dropping out of school after their 10th standard were now focusing on their studies, thanks to his guidance. We could see our children become ambitious and even become toppers in their schools,” says Girija L. (30), a mother of two.

She adds, “From arranging Aadhaar cards to honing the job skills of our youngsters, he is always there for anyone who needs help. He was no longer just a tutor.”

Villagers in Vanjivakkam.

Within a year, Priyadarshan knew this place was his calling. So he forgo his ambition, relocated from Chennai and made Vanjivakkam his home. He even took up a teaching job at a local school. When he had gained the complete trust of the villagers in the subsequent years, he hatched his next big plan.

He wanted to make Vanjivakkam a 100% open-defecation-free zone. In 2018, he and his students went door-to-door campaigning and spoke to parents of the dangers of defecating in the open. The women, who often had to wait till the wee hours and walk close to one km to relieve themselves or to attend to their menstrual needs, were already on his side.

Girija recalls, “Till last monsoon, it was a nightmare to go out in the fields with our children during heavy rains. We even used to eat less so that we wouldn’t have to go to the field at odd hours. So, when Ashok sir said he could arrange to build toilets for us, we readily agreed.”

Priyadarshan also convinced the men of the need to protect their families from anti-social elements. When all else failed, “I asked my students to go on a strike till their families got toilets built,” he laughs.

Also, Priyadarshan did not want a mere building, he wanted a facility that they could use with ease. “Most of these houses did not have space for separate toilets but already had baths inside their compound. So, we changed the limited bath space the villagers already had into a toilet and bath facility and decked it up with social messages to encourage them to use it,” he says.

Apart from the Rs 12,000 sponsored through the government’s individual household latrine scheme of the Swachh Bharat Mission, he raised funds through friends and local NGOs like Dreams Alive, Sri Ramanujam Mission Trust, etc. to make the restrooms spacious and eye-pleasing. Priyadarshan says that though he focused on getting good quality construction material, he could still save on the cost by booking them in bulk.

Like most Indian villages, Vanjivakkan also had no centralised system for sewage management. Excreta and waste water were collected in individual septic tanks, which had to be cleaned every year. Some villagers refused to build toilets to avoid the costly and arduous waste disposal. This was solved by building bio toilets that let people turn their waste into compost.

As the waste was collected in two different tanks, villagers could take turn turns to use one for compost and another to collect their sewage. Within a year, he had helped build 443 toilets in Vanjivakkam and Asana Budhur villages, and is currently working on building 133 toilets in the neighbouring Madimaikandigai and Vererangivedu villages of the same panchayat.

Ashok Priyadarshan speaking to students.

Now, the difficult part was getting them to actually use these toilets.

It was here that he decided to use the power of his students again. Apart from conducting awareness programmes with his students (through street plays), he took to quirky ways to convince the villagers. Having helped them get toilets, he stated that he had but one condition: If the toilets were left unused, his students would use them. This led to more people taking ownership of their toilets.

Today, Vanjivakkam has toilets in every home and villagers have finally made it a habit to use them. Priyadarshan has even managed to get a bus to ply to his village after requesting the collector to help the locals. He tells us that more often than not, it is the mindset that needs to be addressed. “There is need for social education. Before we teach someone, we need to reach out to them. It is like feeding a child, all we need to do is convince the child to take the first bite. The child will eat once he/she gets the taste of it.”

Meanwhile, Vanmathi is happy that she doesn’t have to wake somebody up every time she goes to the toilet, nor does she have to cross a bunch of giggling eyes to reach the fields. “It is not just about toilets, it is about our dignity,” she smiles.

It may be a while till India becomes fully open-defecation free, we hope for the sake of our Vanmathis and Girijas that the day is not far.

All photos by Catherine Gilon.

Catherine Gilon is a journalist based at Chennai.

World Toilet Day: Ground Reality Blows a Hole Through Mumbai’s ODF Claim

In Siddharth Nagar, the government had installed makeshift solutions and quick fixes to ensure that the city’s ODF claim could be made.

At the heart of the 2030 Agenda is the principle of ‘leaving no one behind’. This UN campaign has gained centre stage in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). SDG6 aims to achieve sanitation for all and end open defecation. Consequently, it is crucial to examine what national governments are doing to achieve these goals.

India launched its Swach Bharat Mission (SBM) (Clean India Mission) in 2014 with the aim to make the country Open Defecation Free (ODF) by 2019. However, the mission has attracted significant criticism. For instance, it has been accused of skewing data to mask the lack of progress in providing sanitation for all.

Indeed, conditions on the ground suggest that SBM may have had the opposite effect: restricting, rather than enabling, user access to toilets. On the example of an informal settlement in Mumbai, the following sections illustrate the struggle for sanitation of urban communities in India.

Sidharth Nagar (red-dotted boundary)

Siddharth Nagar, a slum settlement in Mumbai and home to more than 650 migrant families, was declared ODF in April 2018. The settlement is abutted against posh residential areas, a nallah (stream-sewer) and middle-class housing buildings. Residents here are mostly domestic workers and auto-rickshaw drivers. They hail primarily from rural Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

The ‘slum mafia’ in this settlement sells 10×10 feet plots upwards of amounts of Rs 20,000­­­ (app. £220). Additional investment in tin sheets for walls and plastic for a roof is required to make the land a house. Migrants have no option other than to settle for this, especially in a city like Mumbai where housing prices are skyrocketing and affordable options are virtually non-existent. The settlement has been denied basic amenities by the authorities and has been subjected to repeated bouts of demolitions. Toilets do not exist, despite efforts by the residents over the years.

Also read: Declaring India ‘Open Defecation Free’ Doesn’t Mean Sanitation Goals Have Been Met

Faced with the government’s willful neglect, residents had to resort to open defecation. They worked out segregated timings for men and women. Eventually, they were able to pool together resources to construct tarpaulin toilets. They collected voluntary donations and built six toilet seats for the community adjacent to the nallah, so that the waste could easily flow to the sea.

Self-constructed toilets in Sidharth Nagar, Mumbai. Photo: Purva Dewoolkar

According to Jaimati, a local resident and activist with Pani Haq Samiti (a water rights campaign in the city), this arrangement did not last. In May 2016, representing the residents in the settlement, Jaimati had written a letter to Indian prime minister and architect of SBM Narendra Modi, requesting toilets under the SBM scheme. The letter read:

“650 Indian households, specifically labourers, are living in a hell-like situation without access to any basic services. When will we have our aache din (good days)?”

Nine months later, the letter was directed to the chief secretary of Maharashtra (the state where Mumbai is located), ‘for action as appropriate’. From the Mumbai municipal commissioner’s office, it was forwarded to the local ward office (the lowest level of city administration). In September 2016, the local ward office approached the landowner (the collector’s office) for permission to construct toilets.

Letter to the prime minister of India. Photo: Purva Dewoolkar

When, after more than a year, Jaimati had still not been given an answer to his plea, he filed an application to view the land owner’s response under the Right to ­­­Information Act and discovered that the permission had been denied. The reason given was that an unidentified part of the land on which the settlement was built was marked as mangroves. The exact boundaries were unknown.

Yet Jaimati was able to find support from an engineer at the local ward office who was keen on building community toilets in Siddharth Nagar and agreed to initiate the process. Since in Mumbai community toilets are taken care of by local Community Based Organizations (CBOs), Jaimati and his team registered as a CBO with the local government and identified the best location for the future toilet block. Municipal engineers visited the location and approved it.

Shortly afterwards, however, the engineer who had initiated the process was transferred to another department. His replacement did not wish to risk placing toilets on mangrove lands. Instead, a ‘Firte Sauchalay’ (moving toilet) appeared in the settlement.

But Jaimati and his team’s struggle was not over.

Also read: Even If Data Is Legit, Swachh Bharat Will Have Failed Its Open Defecation Goal

After only two days, the toilet disappeared again. The local government had swiftly removed it following a complaint lodged by residents of the nearby middle class residential buildings. From the city government’s perspective, the toilet had served its purpose anyway. During the two days of the moving toilet’s presence, a ‘Swachh Sarvekshan’ team – SBM’s competitive ranking agency – had visited the city and their two-day inspection had paved the way for declaring Mumbai ODF.

The city government had installed makeshift solutions and quick fixes to ensure that an ODF claim could be made. In another astute tweak, it interpreted ‘Sanitation for All’ to mean only the pre-2000 residents of Mumbai. January 1, 2000, was the cut-off date for slum regularisation and later settlements are not considered eligible for basic services. Although on paper this policy has been done away with, it is still being practised on the ground.

Firte Sauchalay – Moving Toilet. Photo: Purva Dewoolkar

In Siddharth Nagar, in 2018 the local government delivered four portable toilets (portaloos) in another attempt for a quick fix.  The units were not connected to water or electricity. Waste was not collected in septic tanks as intended, but rather directed into the nallah because the settlement’s four portaloos had been placed in a location where they could not be reached by desludging vehicles.

Also read: Building (Only) Toilets Isn’t Always the Answer to Ending Open Defecation

Three out of the four portable toilets are now defunct. To this day, no community toilets have been constructed in Siddharth Nagar. The local government has been fending off inquiries about the delay with half-baked excuses. Residents are once again using the toilets that they had built themselves.

Photo: Purva Dewoolkar

Out of four portable toilets, only one is operational. Photo: Purva Dewoolkar

As the previous paragraphs demonstrate, the reality of India’s SBM couldn’t be further from the spirit of Sanitation for All. Mechanisms need to be put in place to hold local governments accountable if leaving no one behind is to become more than a guiding principle.

The core issues around India’s struggle to provide access to basic services were reported to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation, Léo Heller, who included them in his report.

 #Grit is an initiative of The Wire dedicated to the coverage of manual scavenging and sanitation and their linkages with caste, gender, policy and apathy. 

Purva Dewoolkar currently works for the ‘Transforming M-Ward’ project at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences as a programme coordinator. She is an architect, urban designer by training.

Ground Report | Bundelkhand: Sanitation, Stray Cattle Aggravate Distress

The construction of roads and pathways, as well as drainage, has been badly neglected and waterlogging becomes a huge problem in the area during the rainy season.

Bundelkhand: Nearly 275 families of the Kuchbandhiya community live in Khamora village in the Mahuwa block of Banda district in the Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh.

These families do not have any land and the basis of their livelihood is very precarious. Amidst such conditions, their source of livelihood from the previous two governments in the form of the Samajwadi and Mahamaya pensions has also been stopped.

More so, in recent times, no work has been undertaken in this area under the rural employment guarantee scheme.

The village is in dire need of toilets – people here have to travel almost kilometre and a half to defecate in the open. Raja, a panchayat member says that he has been trying to get government assistance to construct toilets for the last three years but such facilities have been repeatedly denied to the community. As a result, the prevalence of open defecation in the village is very high.

There is only one hand pump in the village and hence villagers undergo several problems to acquire water for their daily needs.

The construction of roads and pathways, as well as drainage, has been badly neglected and waterlogging becomes a huge problem in the area during the rainy season. While there has been a lot of activity in the name of housing for the poor, most of this work has been marred by corruption and several houses could not be completed.

Dafai village, located in the Karvi block of the Chitrakut district, is a village of Kol tribals and all the people here are landless. Hunger and extreme poverty are evident in nearly all 150 households in the village. Despite this, very little work has been undertaken under the rural employment guarantee scheme in recent times. Here too, villagers lament that the pensions earlier available to them are not available now.

Also read: Caste Discrimination in UP’s Bundelkhand is Worsening the Water Woes of Dalits

In Dafai as well, residents do not have access to toilets and have to use a place near the hills for open defecation. Sharing this space with the men in the village, is very uncomfortable for women. Additionally, heavy traffic of mining trucks makes open defecation for the villagers all the more risky, particularly for children. Despite this, no government relief has been made available for the construction of toilets and today 100% open defecation prevails in the village.

Dafai village, Bundelkhand. Photo: Author provided

The only two hand-pumps in the village are not in good condition and when these break down, women have to travel to another village and encounter additional difficulty while obtaining water from there.

There is no school in this village and only about one-fourth of the children manage to go to the school in a nearby village. The drop-out rate is also very high. In fact, in both these villages one could see the children wandering around aimlessly in just one piece of cloth despite the November chill.

Kolawalpur Raipur village, located in the Mahuwa block of Banda district, comprises of about one hundred Yadav households, mostly small and medium farmers. They say that their biggest problem these days are the hundreds of stray cattle from other villages that are roaming around and destroying their crops. Farmers spend the nights in their fields to protect their crops but the cattle still manage to sneak in and ruin the crop.

The farmers say that this problem has become extremely serious in recent times. Babulal, a former pradhan of this village and a widely respected elderly man, goes to the extent of saying that if the menace of stray cattle goes on increasing at this pace then the very future of agriculture in the village will be threatened.

Villagers also claim that very little help for the construction of toilets was received from the government. Hence open defecation still prevails to the extent of about 80% or so, they say.

Also read: In this Bundelkhand Village, a Cry for Food, not Development

In addition, visits to other villages revealed that when poor people face harassment or suffer atrocities, their chances of receiving justice are very low. Corruption and malpractices are taking strange forms. For example, in several places, NREGA work is done with heavy machines, defeating the very purpose of the scheme.

Then false claims of workers’ wages are sent using the names of persons who are close to or can be manipulated by the village pradhan. Once the wages are received in their bank account, they are asked to hand these over to the pradhan, while a small share is given to them for being a part of this nexus. Hence while the work under NREGA is recorded, needy workers do not get any wages or work.

Several farmers have also complained that they only got the first instalment of the sammaan scheme before the elections but did not get the subsequent instalments. Farmers, as well as others, complain of arbitrary deductions from their bank accounts. Influential big farmers get some benefits of farm insurance, but ordinary farmers are generally deprived of this. This year there has been heavy damage to the til and moong crops, and they are still waiting to be compensated for it.

Bharat Dogra is a freelance journalist who has been involved with several social movements and initiatives.