Govt Forms Panel To Draw Framework for Implementation of Assam Accord

The latest panel will also lay emphasis on implementation of Clause 7, 9 and 10 along with update of the NRC, issues of flood and erosion, rehabilitation of families of martyrs and victims of Assam agitation

Guwahati: The Assam government has set up an eight-member committee to prepare a framework for implementation of all clauses of the 36-year-old Assam Accord, especially the Clause-6 report prepared by a central panel pertaining to protecting the cultural, social and linguistic identity and heritage of the indigenous people, officials said on Saturday.

The Commissioner and Secretary of the Implementation of Assam Accord Department, G.D. Tripathi, issued a notification announcing the formation of a sub-committee, which will submit its report within the next three months.

“The Governor of Assam is pleased to constitute a sub-committee to examine and prepare a framework for implementation of all clauses of Assam Accord in general with special emphasis on Clause-6 (High Level Committee Report),” the notification said.

Also Read: Assam Accord: AASU Says No Compromise on Clause 6 in Response to Sarma’s Comment

The latest panel will also lay emphasis on implementation of Clause 7, 9 and 10 along with update of National Register of Citizens (NRC), issues of flood and erosion, rehabilitation of families of martyrs and victims of Assam agitation, it added.

In addition, the sub-committee will consider various problems faced by the state and potential for all-round economic development while preparing the report for implementation of the historic pact.

The sub-committee, headed by implementation of Assam Accord minister Atul Bora, has three ministers and five members from the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU), the notification stated.

Other ministers on the panel are parliamentary affairs Minister Pijush Hazarika and finance minister Ajanta Neog, while the five from the AASU include its president Dipanka Kumar Nath, general secretary Sankar Jyoti Baruah, chief adviser Samujjal Kumar Bhattacharya, and advisers Prakash Chandra Das and Uddip Jyoti Gogoi.

Deputy secretary of the Implementation of Assam Accord Department Sujata Suchibrata has been appointed the convenor of the sub-committee, the notification said.

On September 7, the Assam government had announced it will form a new committee with members from the AASU after a meeting between the student organisation and chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma.

The Assam Accord was signed in 1985 after a six-year-long violent anti-foreigners movement. It stated, among other clauses, that names of all foreigners settling in Assam on or after March 25, 1971 will be detected and deleted from electoral rolls, and steps will be taken to deport them.

A series of committees have been formed since 1985 by the successive state governments promising to implement the historic pact in letter and spirit. However, many of the clauses remained unfulfilled, including the contentious Clause-6.

According to Clause-6 of the Assam Accord, constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards, as may be appropriate, shall be provided to protect, preserve and promote the culture, social, linguistic identity and heritage of the Assamese people.

The Clause 7 says: “The Government take(s) this opportunity to renew their commitment for the speedy all round economic development of Assam, so as to improve the standard of living of the people. Special emphasis will be placed on education and science and technology through establishment of national institutions.

Clause 9 provides for sealing of the international border, intensifying patrolling on land and river routes, setting up adequate check posts to stop future infiltration and building a road along the border to facilitate patrolling by security forces.

“It will be ensured that relevant laws for prevention of encroachment of government lands in tribal belts and blocks are strictly enforced and unauthorized encroachers evicted as laid down under such laws,” the Clause 10 of the Accord says.

On February 25 last year, a High-Level Committee (HLC) constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs and headed by Justice Biplab Kumar Sarma had submitted its report to the then chief minister Sarbananda Sonowal for handing it over to Union home minister Amit Shah.

Before the Assam assembly polls earlier this year, Himanta Biswa Sarma, who was a senior cabinet minister in the previous BJP government, had said on February 17 that the government cannot implement the recommendations of the HLC as they are “far from legal reality”.

‘Free Gulfisha Fatima’: Civil Society Members Condemn Student Activist’s Arrest Under UAPA

The signatories pointed out that at a time when jails across the world were being decongested, Gulfisha had been languishing in prison for 100 days.

New Delhi: Civil society members, academicians, activists, writers, journalists, artists and lawyers have issued a statement calling for the release of Gulfisha Fatima, a student and community educator, who has been arrested by the Delhi police in connection with the violence that occurred in Delhi in February this year.

Fatima, who has been charged under the draconian Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), is currently lodged at the Tihar jail.

The signatories of the statement, who include Uma Chakravarti, Roop Rekha Verma, Jayati Ghosh, Aisha Farooqui, Mary John, Nandini Sundar, Kavita Krishnan and Pradip Krishen, held that Fatima was charged for “daring to defend the Constitution”  and for resisting the CAA-NRC-NPR.

The statement further held that the Delhi police and the home ministry were using the pandemic as a “convenient excuse” to criminalise and imprison students and activists – many of whom were Muslims – who had protested against the Citizenship Amendment Act and the NRC.

Also read: Big Brother’s Patriarchal Authoritarianism

The signatories also pointed out that at a time when jails across the world were being decongested, Gulfisha had been languishing in prison for 100 days. She was arrested on April 9, 2020, in the early days of the COVID-19-induced lockdown.

The statement also said that in an attempt to harass dissenters, Gulfisha was ‘re-arrested’ in another FIR after she was granted bail in one FIR. It also noted that Gulfisha’s participation, which had been “inspired by the collective struggle of thousands of Muslim women” shattered the dominant narratives peddled by the state about Muslim women who needed to be saved.

The signatories finally demanded that all charges against Gulfisha and other students and activists like Safoora Zargar, Ishrat Jahan, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, Meeran Haider, Sharjeel Imam, Sharjeel Usmani, Khalid Saifi, Akhil Gogoi, Dhairjya Konwar, Bittu Sonowal, Manash Konwar be dropped and that the state investigate and take legal action against the perpetuators of communal violence in recent months in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and other places

The entire text of the statement has been reproduced below.

§

FREE GULFISHA FATIMA –LET HER CARRY ON THE TRUE LEGACY OF SAVITRIBAI AND FATIMA SHEIKH!

19th July 2020: Today marks 100 days since Gulfisha Fatima, a young student and community educator from Seelampur, in North-East Delhi was unjustly arrested by the Delhi Police. She has been falsely charged under the draconian UAPA law for daring to defend the Constitution, and for peacefully resisting the anti-people CAA-NRC-NPR. Just as she lit up the protest spaces with her warm smiles, compassion and innate intelligence, Gulfisha, lovingly known as Gul, continues to keep the flame of justice alive within her at Tihar Jail, as well as the urge to carry on the legacy of her ideals – Savitribai Phule and Fatima Sheikh – the foremost feminist educators of this land!

The country is witness to a brazen one-sided ‘investigation’ into the targeted violence unleashed in North-East Delhi in late February 2020, by the Delhi Police and the Home Ministry, who are using this pandemic as a convenient excuse to criminalise, interrogate and imprison peaceful anti CAA-NRC-NPR protesters, students and democratic activists, of which, many are Muslims. This spate of arrests, has sparked massive outrage from democratic voices across the country and the world, including the United Nations which has expressed grave concern at this ruthless stifling of ‘dissent’.

We all know that the bail finally ‘granted on humanitarian grounds’ for Safoora Zargar – in the second trimester of her pregnancy – was a result of persistent struggles at many levels. Today, we must speak out for the release of all political prisoners, including 27-year-old Gul, who was arrested on 9th April 2020, in the initial phases of the lockdown, when the Govt. imposed a thick curtain on information flow around detentions and arrests. Reportedly, she was mentally tortured during police custody, to add to that her bail applications have been repeatedly rejected by the Courts on technicalities. At a time when de-congestion of jails is a world-wide demand, like many other innocents, Gulfisha has been languishing in jail for 100 days now. That’s 100 days too many!

Between December 2019 to February 2020, millions of citizens across the country, in particular women, took to peacefully challenging the State’s communal project of discrimination and disenfranchisement. There are numerous accounts, of Gul, engaging at the local protest site, running classes, educating children and women from the community, empowering them with a vision of emancipation. In that sense, Gul is an inheritor of the legacy of the legendary Savitribai Phule and Fatima Sheikh, who braved all odds to make education and emancipation for all girls and women a reality. Her efforts as a community educator while raising slogans about ‘Hum Samvidhan Bachane Nikle Hain, Aao Hamare Saath Chalo’ is a brave and poignant moment in today’s times. Her sensitivity to the spirit of the women in the community is a roadmap to how education itself must be re-imagined pedagogically for it to be inclusive, non-discriminatory and accessible.

A promising student like Gul, hailing from a marginalized community, should have been encouraged and supported by the Government. However, by jailing her, the patriarchal state is sending out a chilling message intending to keep women students ‘in-check’ and out of educational institutions, tightening the bonds of servitude that women have long fought to break from. The government’s so-called commitment to ‘Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao’ is no more than empty rhetoric for, when the ‘betis’ rise to learn and lead and ‘bachao’ the Constitution of this country, the regime crushes and cages their dreams and dissent mercilessly.

Gulfisha braved too many odds, stood by her community, holding to heart the Constitution and educating while struggling, even as she went on ensuring that everyone was well-fed during those long, chilly winter nights! To charge such a harbinger of peace under draconian terror charges is a crime against humanity and absolute travesty! Her participation, inspired by the collective struggle of thousands of Muslim women, who countered the divisive CAA-NRC-NPR project of the government by re-imagining resistance as a collective, leaderless struggle shatters the farce of dominant narratives that ‘Muslim women are in need of saving’. The current regime clearly stands exposed in its intentions as it jeopardizes women’s lives, their families and communities.

As has now become an established practice by the state to harass and harangue people, as soon as Gul was granted bail in one FIR, she was ‘re-arrested’ in another FIR, under the newly amended UAPA, which gives the government a license of unending impunity to pronounce ‘dissenting voices’ as a threat to ‘national security! The ‘outlandishness’ of the UAPA law can also be gleaned from the fact that even a ‘first-time protestor’ like young Gul can be charged and jailed arbitrarily for long periods! The incarceration of Gulfisha and all the other anti CAA-NRC-NPR protesters bears testimony to the state that miserably failed to dialogue with the communities that constitutionally and democratically appealed to the government to reconsider its anti-people policies, over months of peaceful and awe-inspiring protest, marked routinely by calls for violence by right-wing leaders and top politicians from the majority community.

As we stand with Gul, we demand a summary repeal of the UAPA law that grants the government such sweeping powers or arrest and incarceration without any safety net of accountability.

As we stand with Gul, we stand equally with all the other young activists, students and other leaders including Safoora Zargar, Ishrat Jahan, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal, Meeran Haider, Sharjeel Imam, Sharjeel Usmani, Khalid Saifi, Akhil Gogoi, Dhairjya Konwar, Bittu Sonowal, Manash Konwar and countless others who are bearing the might of the fascist, masculinist, police state for daring to stand by values of democracy, secularism, equality and justice.

As we stand with Gul, we demand that the state immediately drop all fake charges foisted on her and all other students & activists and instead take stringent legal action against each one of those who have been responsible for the targeted communal violence and hate crimes in Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and other places in the past many months.

May a Thousand Gulfishas Bloom! Free Gulfisha Fatima! Free All Political Prisoners

Statement on Gulfisha Fatima by The Wire on Scribd

‘Gandhi’s Vision Threatened by Violence, Divisive Rhetoric in India,’ Says Ban Ki Moon

In a recent essay, the former UN Secretary-General said that he was “profoundly disappointed and alarmed by the communal violence that disfigured Delhi in recent weeks.”

New Delhi: Former Secretary-General of the UN Ban Ki Moon, in an essay, has expressed concern over the violence that erupted in north east Delhi in the month of February and has said “that Gandhi’s vision is now threatened by sectarian violence and divisive political rhetoric”.

In an article for the Indian Express, Moon who is the deputy chair of The Elders – a group founded by Nelson Mandela to work for peace and justice across the world – said that he was “profoundly disappointed and alarmed by the communal violence that disfigured Delhi in recent weeks.”

Referring to India’s credentials as a democracy that had made its mark in global business, academia, IT, entertainment and sport, Moon said that India could teach the world “its traditions of democracy and ahimsa (non-violence)”

Moon held that the attacks on poor and working people, mainly Muslims, could not be seen in isolation from Prime Minister Modi’s attempts to redefine Indian citizenship via the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the proposed National Population Register (NPR) and National Register for Citizens (NRC). all of which were incompatible with Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. These developments, Moon said, raised questions about India’s democratic future.

Also read: ‘Fundamentally Discriminatory’: UN Human Rights Chief Expresses Concern on Citizenship Act

“Callous imperialism was the handmaiden to India’s violent birth as an independent state. Today, only Indians are responsible for the direction of their country,” the former Secretary-General of the UN wrote.

Noting that the denial of citizenship based on religion “prompts memories of some of the darkest periods in recent human history,” Moon said that India could not overcome its developmental challenges by pitting religious groups against one other and turning some Indians into second-class citizens.

The former Secretary-General also expressed alarm over the “arbitrary attacks on India’s Muslims” based on rumours about cow slaughter and said that the actions amounted to vigilante punishment. “If India were to go further down this path of nationalist and religious discrimination, it would be a political and social catastrophe that could set back the country’s development for generations,” he said.

Moon said that protests in Assam last year in response to the proposal of the citizenship law “should have prompted the government to pause and listen to its citizens” when there was widespread fear after the Assam NRC about citizens being declared stateless when the next census was to be carried out in 2021. He also said that protests against the citizenship law united members across different religions and this display of solidarity was evident when civil society groups came together to support victims of violence in Delhi.

Moon noted that he was impressed by the model of free, universal services that he saw at a “Mohalla” clinic in Delhi with chief minister Arvind Kejriwal. “It is only through free, unified and collective mobilisation that India can achieve lasting peace, justice and prosperity. Your country’s founding fathers understood this necessity,” Moon said.

Also read: Interview: Why the UN Rights Office Is Concerned About the CAA

Last month, the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres raised concerns over the CAA and proposed NRC and said that “statelessness” must be prevented when a nationality law is changed. On a three-day visit to Pakistan, Guterres said that he was concerned about the new laws in India.

“The present High Commissioner for Refugees is quite active to this situation like many others like this. Because there is risk of statelessness created by those national laws.” he said. “It is absolutely essential when a nationality law is changed, the statelessness is prevented. Because when basic right of anyone anywhere is to have a country that a person calls his, then everything should be done in order to avoid statelessness.”.

Earlier this month, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet moved to file an intervention application in the Indian Supreme Court against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). “Citizenship Amendment Act adopted last December is of great concern. Indians in huge numbers, and from all communities, have expressed – in a mostly peaceful manner – their opposition to the Act, and support for the country’s long tradition of secularism,” Bachelet stated in a statement.

The UN human rights chief had also expressed concern about reports of “police inaction in the face of attacks against Muslims by other groups, as well as previous reports of excessive use of force by police against peaceful protesters”.