‘Jersey’ Is a Predictable Reiteration That Bollywood Thinks Winning Is Everything

Jersey’s matches are shot with a lot of flair, but the movie doesn’t ‘get’ cricket.

Arjun Talwar (Shahid Kapoor) can only measure his present in terms of his past. Suspended from his government job on the charges of corruption, he stays at home and does nothing. His son Kittu (Ronit Kamra) wants an Indian team jersey for his birthday. It costs Rs 500; Arjun doesn’t have the money. His wife, Vidhya (Mrunal Thakur), works as a receptionist to support the family. She is responsible, Arjun negligent, and they fight – a lot. If Arjun wants to clear his name in the corruption scandal, he’ll have to cough up Rs 50,000 – an amount so huge that there’s no point even thinking about it (not that he wants to bribe; he maintains his innocence).

But a decade ago, in 1986, times were different, so was Arjun. Representing Punjab in Ranji Trophy, he was an ace batsman, hitting close to 100 fifties and 50 hundreds. His coach Madhav (Pankaj Kapoor), a father-like figure coaching Arjun since he was 13, considered him the best batsman ever. But then life happened. Arjun couldn’t make it to the national team, got married, and quit cricket. Madhav keeps telling him to apply for an assistant coach job, in the present day, but Arjun doesn’t budge; he’s done with the sport. He returns to it only when he finds out that a charity match between the Punjab and the New Zealand team would pay him Rs 1,000.

Directed by Gowtam Tinnanuri, who also helmed the 2019 Telugu original, Jersey starts on a surprisingly restrained note. Hindi films (and their heroes) have an unfortunate tendency to romanticise failure. It must be so huge, so life-altering, that it drowns out everything else, materialising a climactic catharsis. Those movies, then, aren’t about failures as much as how they’re overcome – the loss has been reduced to a plot point, a repulsive eyesore.

Also read: Rishi Kapoor’s Excellent Performance in ‘Sharmaji Namkeen’ Makes For a Memorable Swansong

But in Jersey’s initial segment, failure isn’t life-altering but life itself. When Vidhya leaves for work, Arjun’s friends come over to drink and play cards. He sits with them, disinterested, tossing a tennis ball in his hands. When Kittu is disappointed that he couldn’t become the class team captain, Arjun tells him that the best player isn’t necessarily the captain – that the captain is someone who gets the best out of every player. Vidhya keeps reminding Arjun to pay the pending bills; he keeps forgetting to pay. One more day, one more disappointment – how does it matter? Failure in these portions is not a piercing wail but an ordinary hum – a default setting, a daily routine.

The first troubling signs emerge when the film cuts to a flashback detailing Arjun’s past life. In these bits, he’s a star batsman, a hero. Playing a local match, about to bat next, he’s making out with Vidhya in a far-flung corner. He comes out (when a teammate bangs on the door, for a player has just got out), hears a condescending comment about his girlfriend, punches the man, threatens him to repeat the lines, meets Vidhya, and then goes out to bat. (How does he not get timed out is beyond me.) This is Shahid Kapoor of Kabir Singh, a character whose hostility is mistaken for masculinity.

A large portion of the film is framed around Arjun and Kittu, but Tinnanuri fails to extract any meaningful performance from Kamra, giving him stilted lines, making him sound and behave like a wise grown-up (very reminiscent of kids in ’70s Bollywood). Even Arjun’s increasing desperation – his inability to afford the jersey – starts to feel hollow. Why not, simply, borrow the money from his coach, a man who believes so much in him? Or why not just take an assistant coach job? But no, this is a Hindi film, and only the moon will do: Arjun wants to play cricket again at the age of 36 – he wants to represent India. There too, Jersey doesn’t have anything new to offer. Tension simmers through trite and silly ‘villains’: a coach doesn’t allow him to practice, a teammate hides his gloves (!). Ditto Vidhya who, constantly demonised, is reduced to a ‘nagging’ wife. Pankaj Kapoor, too, is wasted here, a preternaturally chirpy fellow who peddles such platitudes as, “Age is just a number, puttar.”

We get that Arjun is playing for his pride, that he wants to be seen as a worthy father. But the inciting incident of that motivation – Kittu asking for a jersey – seems way too flimsy. Even the most evident pathos-ridden conversations between the father and son – such as Kittu replacing Sachin’s poster in his cupboard with Arjun’s – are explained (again and again).

Unlike 83 and Kaun Pravin Tambe?, Jersey’s matches are shot with a lot of flair. Even though it employs basic, even stale techniques, such as oblique angles and quick cuts, the camera recedes to show the full expanse of cricketing shots – and they seem both credible and arresting, making us buy Arjun’s talent. Like 83, however, Jersey doesn’t ‘get’ cricket. The Ranji matches look like T-20: in the final, Karnataka has scored 230 runs in 46 overs, declaring at 454 in 127 overs (that too in 1996 – its real-life counterpart had scored at a cumulative rate of less than three runs per over). Which gets worse: Punjab needs 352 in 47 overs – and I don’t need to tell you what happened next.

Arjun returns to the field after 10 years, but he experiences no stiffness, no self-doubts. Neither in the first charity game nor in the subsequent Ranji matches. What we get instead is the ‘Baahubalification’ of cricket. Arjun advises a bowler; he gets wickets. Arjun dives in the slips and scoops stunning catches. Arjun wields the bat; the opponents cease to exist. We don’t know what cricket did to him (in the past) or does to him (in the present). Surely, a cricketer feels something towards the game even beyond the notions of excellence and honour?

Also read: Indian Cinema: A Story of Flawed Means and Perfect Endings

Arjun is such a superhero that, at one point, I was compelled to note, ‘If he is so talented, then why could he not make it to the Indian team?’ The climactic twist answers that question. It’s a cheap trick, a benign version of The Usual Suspects, hiding a (shocking!) secret, that upends our views of the preceding events. But here’s the thing: for this kind of a twist to work, everything else in the film should work regardless. Here it doesn’t. The climax has a very adolescent ‘I fooled you, didn’t I’ feel to it. More so, the big giveaway is its first scene where, in 2022, Kittu goes to buy a bestselling nonfiction book, Jersey, then says he has to attend his father’s felicitation ceremony later. So, when the Punjab team plays the Ranji final against Mumbai, it’s not difficult to connect the dots.

Jersey is painfully predictable, like Hindi cinema’s fixation on victories.

‘Toofan’ is a Mediocre Rehash of Tired, Old Bollywood Cliches and Tropes

Only once does Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra surprise the audience with an element of subversion that comes as a pleasant surprise.

A certain kind of popular Hindi cinema relished staple tropes: hardy hero, servile sidekick, convenient coincidences, contrasting characters, parental opposition, perilous romance — and of course, template songs. Pleasant escapism became a formula; a formula became a depressing time machine. Bollywood has done some heartening course correction over the last several years; now most shoddy films find newer ways to fumble. But Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra’s Toofan, premiering on Amazon Prime Video, insists on using a dial-up connection in the age of streaming platforms.

It’s all in there: a violent extortionist, Aziz (Farhan Akhtar); a respectable doctor, Ananya (Mrunal Thakur); a funny sidekick, Munna (Hussain Dalal); a fastidious coach, Nana Prabhu (Paresh Rawal); debilitating odds; fighting underdog; and an impossible dream, a national boxing championship. And so it begins, a step-by-step reconstruction of an old formula. Aziz gets injured in a fight, goes to a local hospital, sees a doctor, who turns out to be Ananya (of course). They start on a rough note, keep bumping into each other, and – you know how it ends, don’t you? There are enough contrasts. Aziz and Ananya: feared and loved, Dongri and Dadar. Aziz and Aziz: a ruffian and a softie (who spends his free time with the kids at an orphanage; those scenes are filmed with as much finesse as some foreign correspondents describing ‘poor’ Indians).

Ananya sees the compassionate side of Aziz through – what else but – a coincidence. Aziz watches a three-minute YouTube video of a Mohammed Ali match and wants to become a boxer. Nana, a renowned coach, finally decides to train Aziz, but he turns out to be – what are the odds! – Ananya’s father. Sometimes you think the film is operating in some sly meta mode. In an early scene, for instance, Ananya mocks a nurse (Supriya Pathak) defending Aziz, saying, “Uske haalaat bure hain [oh, his circumstances are bad]” – borrowing a line from Hindi potboilers verbatim.

Toofan also stays loyal to the Bollywood playbook (“if a recent approach has been successful, borrow its crucial elements”). So, we’ve some Gully Boy vibes: a poor Mumbai underdog as neglected as his locality — rough around the edges, an evident victim of class divide – training to win a prestigious championship. There’s even a rap song here (besides other similarities: same production house and a co-writer, Vijay Maurya). And if such derivations aren’t enough, the central conceit itself, a boxing drama, is stale, an overfed sub-genre that burps in clichés.

Rehashing popular ideas to make a crowd-pleasing entertainer isn’t a dealbreaker. But unlike any creative adaptation, Toofan is mindless adoption. Mehra, whose films have become progressively worse since Delhi 6 (2009), seems way too complacent, isolating his drama from the possibilities of discovery. Yet a small subplot – politically relevant, subverting genre expectations – stands out: Nana being a bigot. Moreover, giving that role to Rawal, who is right-wing and a vocal champion of the current dispensation, is a casting coup. The writing becomes sharp whose candour takes you by disconcerting surprise. “We should keep Muslims at an arm’s length,” says Nana early in the movie. The film continues to explore his mindset, interrogating and busting his vicious bubble. Later, Nana refuses to order food from a Muslim restaurant, even telling his liberal friend (Mohan Agashe), “Hinduism is in danger because of people like you”, and objects to his daughter’s marriage citing “love jihad”.

Bollywood films hardly depict Hindu fundamentalism, and they definitely don’t do it via an otherwise positive character (Nana is a loving father, an honest friend, a sharp coach). There’s an excellent scene where his friend tells Nana, in reference to him coaching Aziz, that his real religion is boxing. But this is still a Mehra directorial [who last made Mere Pyare Prime Minister (2019)], so this subplot is only effective till a point: Ananya hardly questions her father’s bigotry (her defiance only goes as much to say, “Aziz isn’t like this”) followed by some ‘balancing’ act where Aziz’s landlady tells Ananya to change her name to “Amina” and, when the couple disagrees, orders them to find a new house.

Illogical twists

The rest of the film continues being thoroughly mediocre, popping illogical twists. One of them, transforming the second half, makes no sense at all. Centered on Aziz’s moral conundrum, it contradicts his views in a short span. (People can be contradictory, but the theatrical plot turn doesn’t give you the sense that the makers are self-aware.) Even that twist’s revelation, through CCTV footage in a sports complex, demonstrates a lack of even bare-minimum effort to convince the audience. Since this is a sports drama, we get, probably for the ten-thousandth time in the history of cinema, a training montage. This trope, much like the rest of the movie, is quite stereotypical – except for split screens trying to make it look ‘different’. In fact, Mehra isn’t directing such a segment for the first time. His 2013 film, Bhaag Milkha Bhaag (also starring Akhtar), had a similar stretch set to a song (also scored by Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy), where a tormented athlete subjected himself to a punishing regime (also featuring tires and ropes).

Like Bhaag Milkha Bhaag, Toofan manufactures simplistic villains to mould our sympathies. Aziz’s final opponent, a brawny figure with a murderous stare, doesn’t even look like a person. A bigger villain (Darshan Kumar) – once defeated by Aziz, now a boxing federation official – resurfaces with a glass eye. The dude could have tattooed “douchebag” on his forehead, and even that would have been more subtle. Besides, the climactic twist, centered on Evil Eye and Nana, is so predictable and ludicrous that even mediocre film students would have discarded it from their first drafts. Yet it bookends Toofan like a badge of honour, marking a new chapter in Bollywood embarrassment.

Watch | Meet the Creators of India’s First Female Superhero Comic Character

Mitali Mukherjee in conversation with Ram Devineni, the mind behind Priya, and actor Mrunal Thakur on how India’s first female superhero comic character has evolved in a pandemic year and what their short film hopes to address.

In the wake of the gruesome Delhi gang rape and murder in December 2012, US-based Director and Creator Ram Devineni created Priya – branded as India’s first female superhero – a rape survivor, to combat gender-based violence through the medium of comic strips. Since then, Priya has taken on issues like sex trafficking, acid attacks, and in the pandemic struck the year of 2020, issues like COVID-19 and mental health.

The character was named Gender Equality Champion by UN Women and the team has now released an animated short film along with the comic. Voiced by actors from India and the US like Mrunal Thakur as Priya, Vidya Balan and Rosanna Arquette as Sahas, the series hopes to address social perils amongst the youth community and create empathy and identification with survivors.

Here’s Mitali Mukherjee in conversation with Ram Devineni, the mind behind Priya, and Mrunal Thakur, actor and the voice of Priya, on how Priya has evolved in a pandemic year and what their short film hopes to address.