Make LPG Affordable to Poor Households, Women’s Collective Appeals to Centre

‘Warrior Moms’, in a letter to Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, sought provisions for widening the reach of the LPG subsidy programme in the upcoming Union budget.

New Delhi: Warrior Moms – a collective of mothers from across India fighting for children’s right to breathe clean air – wrote to Union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman to make provisions in the Union budget 2023-24 to make Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) affordable to poor households.

The letter highlighted that millions of households were unable to make the switch to LPG owing to insufficiency of subsidy provided under Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojna (PMUY) and due to hindrance in obtaining timely refill of cylinders.

In the letter, Warrior Moms also highlighted that 80% of interviewees in a study conducted by the Council on Energy, Environment, and Water (CEEW) cited the inability to afford LPG (either due to the cost of the connection or recurring expenses on fuel) as the primary reason for not having an LPG connection in states like Jharkhand, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, and Odisha.

The letter to Sitharaman further said it was “disturbing to see the obstacles that women in urban-poor and rural households face due to the exorbitantly priced LPG refills across India. Continued usage of such fuels also has disastrous consequences on their health and well-being. We urge the Government of India to take this into account and raise the subsidy amount well beyond the current extension of Rs 200, along with making the distribution of LPG smoother across the country”.

Also read: Since 2016, PMUY Beneficiaries Consuming Less LPG Than Non-Ujjwala Consumers: RTI Data

The letter pointed out that “unable to afford cylinders now priced at over INR 1,100 on average, underprivileged households continue to depend on unclean fuels, like firewood, dung cakes, coal, agricultural residues, and plastic for their daily cooking and water heating needs, resulting in serious health implications (stillbirths, asthma, bronchitis, COPD, growth stagnation, decrease in life expectancy, high infant mortality rates) as burning chulha drastically reduces air quality”.

Household air pollution, a major concern

The group said household air pollution contributes to 30-50% of the ambient air quality in India. Also, it said, over 40% of households in India still don’t have access to clean cooking fuel despite close to universal coverage of the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY).

Prime Minister Narendra Modi distributes the free LPG connections to the beneficiaries, under PM Ujjwala Yojana in Ballia on May 1, 2016. Union Minister for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Kalraj Mishra is also seen. Photo: PTI

It further added that “this toxic exposure is worsened by the lack of proper ventilation in their small homes exposing women, children and the elderly to the harmful impacts of smoke and household air pollution (HAP).”

As per the Global Burden of Disease study conducted in 2019, it pointed out, HAP is a significant contributor to the total disease burden in India, accounting for nearly 6 lakh deaths.

Premature deaths due to respiratory failure

The letter also noted that over 30% of premature deaths in India are from respiratory failure due to high air pollution, and one in three children in every major city has impaired lungs. Clean cooking would also have a significant impact on overall air pollution and reduce pollution levels, especially in densely populated urban areas, it added.

Also read: How Effective Is the Prime Minister’s Ujjwala Yojana on the Ground?

As such the letter demanded that Sitharaman make provisions in the upcoming 2022-23 Budget for providing LPG connections to households left out of PMUY; make LPG refills affordable at a subsidised rate for all PMUY beneficiaries; and strengthen the LPG distributor network in rural areas. It added that “it is imperative to provide all our underprivileged constituents with heavily subsidised cooking cylinders and refills (targeted subsidies, based on household income)”.

Support from MPs

The demand raised by Warrior Moms has also been endorsed by a large number of members of parliament and prominent citizens. The MPs who have supported the demand include Chandra P Choudhury of All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU), Jharkhand; D. Ravikumar of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK); K. Jayakumar, T.N. Prathapan and Shashi Tharoor of Congress; Farooq Abdulla of Jammu and Kashmir National Conference; former Union minister Maneka Gandhi and her son Varun Gandhi of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP); Mahua Maji of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha; Mohammad Basheer of Indian Union Muslim League; Saugata Roy of Trinamool Congress; and Nationalist Congress Party’s Rajya Sabha MP Vandana Chavan.

Apart from them, the demand has also been endorsed by author and great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, Tushar Gandhi; former Patna high court judge Anjana Prakash; social activists Aruna Roy, Mallika Sarabhai and Irom Sharmila; actor Dia Mirza; public health physician Mira Shiva; Aam Aadmi Party spokesperson for Haryana Sarika Verma; and former MPs Rajeev Gowda of Congress and Subhashini Ali of Communist Party of India (Marxist).

Raising the issues of health, particularly among women, arising out of the use of unclean fuel, Warrior Moms had over the past year carried out several surveys and studies and prepared awareness videos on the issue of air pollution.

It had also submitted 5,000 postcards to the minister of petroleum and natural gas, Hardeep Puri, from mothers across the country covering geographies such as Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Chennai, and Delhi NCR which urged the government to address the issue of household air pollution by ensuring access and affordability to LPG for all poor households.

Rajasthan Govt Will Give Ujjwala Beneficiaries 12 LPG Cylinders Per Year for Rs 500 Each

Ashok Gehlot said his government would take one step after another to ease out the impact of inflation on people.

New Delhi: Poor families covered under the Ujjwala scheme will be given 12 LPG cylinders a year for Rs 500 each in Rajasthan from April 1, chief minister Ashok Gehlot announced on Monday.

Gehlot made the announcement in the presence of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and former party chief Rahul Gandhi at a rally here on the sidelines of the Bharat Jodo Yatra.

“I am preparing for the budget next month…. Right now, I want to say only one thing. Under the sham of the Ujjwala scheme, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has provided the poor with LPG connections but the cylinders are lying empty as the rates have increased from Rs 400 to Rs 1,040,” the veteran Congress leader said.

“I would like to announce on this occasion that those who are below the poverty line and covered by the Ujjwala scheme, a study of their category would be conducted and from April 1, they will be given 12 cylinders a year for Rs 500 each,” he added.

Gehlot said his government would take one step after another to ease out the impact of inflation on people.

Highlighting his government’s schemes, the chief minister said due to the 50 units of free electricity and the amount of Rs 1,000 being given to farmers every month, 46 lakh of them are not paying anything for their power consumption.

“As regards social security, we are giving pension to one crore people. We did great work during the coronavirus pandemic and even the WHO (World Health Organization) praised it,” he said.

Gehlot also talked about the steps taken by his government to boost employment opportunities.

The assembly polls are due in Rajasthan by the end of next year and the Congress is making all efforts to secure a second straight term in the state.

However, these efforts have been marred by an ongoing power tussle between Gehlot and his bete noire, Sachin Pilot.

Attacking the Narendra Modi government at the Centre, Gehlot alleged that democracy is being weakened in the country and institutions such as the judiciary, the Election Commission (EC) and probe agencies are working under fear.

People used to be scared of the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the Income-Tax department and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) earlier but now, these agencies themselves are afraid thinking what order would come next from the top, he said.

The Congress leader said the entire country is reeling under unemployment and price rise and alleged that the economy is being destroyed and divisions are being created.

“No one knows in which direction the country will be taken,” he said, accusing those in power at the Centre of being “fascist and dictatorial”.

Gehlot also alleged that those who criticise the BJP-led Centre are being sent to jail.

He said in such an environment, Gandhi has taken out the Bharat Jodo Yatra to unite people and it is being talked about all over the world.

(With PTI inputs)

Since 2016, PMUY Beneficiaries Consuming Less LPG Than Non-Ujjwala Consumers: RTI Data

The rise in LPG prices, delivery issues, a lack of awareness and late transfer of the subsidy amount could be some of the reasons for lower consumption.

Chandigarh: More than six years since its launch, there appears to be a significant gap between the annual consumption of LPG by Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) beneficiaries and non-PMUY consumers, government data show.

According to data obtained under the Right To Information (RTI) Act from three oil marketing companies (OMCs) – Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited – a total number of 179 crore cylinders were sold to 30.5 crore active LPG subscribers in India in the financial year 2021-22.

Of this, nine crore PMUY beneficiaries refilled 31 crore cylinders at an average of 3.5 cylinders a year per consumer. On the other hand, 21.5 crore non-PMUY consumers refilled 148 crore cylinders at an average of seven cylinders a year per consumer.

Overall, the average consumption of total active LPG consumers in India in FY22 was approximately six cylinders a year per consumer, the RTI data showed.

Though the PMUY website says 99% of households in India now have access to LPG connections, the ground reality appears to be different.

The PMUY scheme was launched in May 2016 to make clean cooking fuel available to rural and below poverty line households to replace traditional cooking fuels such as firewood, coal and cow-dung.

Ashok Sreenivas, senior fellow at Pune-based think tank Prayas, who has done extensive research on energy policy, told The Wire that a rough calculation of the RTI data suggests that for a household of four people, about seven to eight cylinders a year may be required if all the cooking is done using LPG.

“But the RTI data essentially indicates that Ujjwala [PMUY] beneficiaries are not able or willing to purchase as many cylinders as non-Ujjwala consumers,” he said, adding that there may be many people who have not refilled even a single cylinder despite enrolling for the LPG connection.

Ever since the scheme was launched, LPG consumption among PMUY beneficiaries has remained low, except for the financial year 2020-21, when the Union government offered free refills to the beneficiaries as part of its COVID-19 relief package.

Source: RTI reply

The factors influencing low LPG consumption among PMUY beneficiaries

There could be multiple reasons for the low LPG consumption among PMUY beneficiaries such as high prices making refills unaffordable, high transportation costs as distributors are far away, a lack of awareness about the benefits of LPG, or insufficient decision-making power of the women in a household, Srinivas said.

Last year, a survey by the Delhi-based Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) too found that despite increased LPG access, 38% of the Indian households, mainly in rural areas, relied upon freely available solid fuels, primarily due to high refill price of LPG cylinders.

An LPG refill in March 2014 was priced at Rs 410, which has now increased to Rs 1,060. The chances of its further increase can’t be ruled out in the wake of the global energy upheaval due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

This means that a four-member household, which needs at least seven cylinders to meet its annual cooking energy needs, must incur at least Rs 7,000 a year.

This appears to be a daunting task for the millions of poor households, especially when they were massively hit by the economic slowdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Over the last year, LPG refilling cost has jumped by Rs 218 per cylinder, which, apart from pinching the middle class, appears to have mitigated the subsidy impact on poor families, too.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi distributes the free LPG connections to the beneficiaries, under PM Ujjwala Yojana in Ballia on May 1, 2016. Union Minister for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Kalraj Mishra is also seen. Photo: PTI

“Combined with a drop in household incomes due to the pandemic-induced economic crisis, high LPG prices pose a risk to its sustained use, particularly among low-income households,” CEEW observed in its survey, which covered 14,850 urban and rural households in 21 most populous states in 2020.

Added to that, experts say that under the direct benefit transfer, PMUY beneficiaries have to pay the entire refill cost first and then the subsidy amount is credited into their bank account. Moreover, it’s a big challenge for poor families to refill the LPG cylinder at full cost.

Besides, many have raised concerns over not receiving their fuel subsidies on time. The survey mentioned that 13% of the households did not receive the subsidy for their last LPG refill and 23% did not know if they had received it or not.

“Absence of home delivery of LPG refills or delayed delivery is another deterrent to regular LPG use. Only half of the rural LPG consumers get their refills home delivered,” the survey added.

Watch: How Effective Is the Prime Minister’s Ujjwala Yojana on the Ground?

The solutions 

Sreenivas told The Wire that providing more subsidies can be one way of dealing with the challenge to increase LPG consumption.

He added that government needs to adopt an advance subsidy module. Currently, PMUY beneficiaries need to pay the entire cylinder cost and wait for their subsidy reimbursement, which takes a few days and can be unreliable too. This has a major impact on the cash flow of poor consumers and discourages them from purchasing LPG refills.

To address this issue, the government can make advance subsidy payments to the OMCs based on their sales estimates, which can be reconciled on, say, a quarterly basis. This will enable the OMCs to transfer subsidies immediately to the beneficiaries’ accounts as soon as a purchase is recorded on a point-of-sale machine. This process is similar to how the public distribution system for food grains works, he said.

According to him, there is also a need to improve the distribution network and enhance the accountability of public sector oil marketing companies and distributors.

Distributors in rural areas may be permitted to undertake some other businesses from the same premises to increase their incomes, he added.

In 2020, Prayas, in one of its research papers, called for an independent regulator for the LPG sector, which could help in ensuring service quality, fair pricing and distribution.

Sreenivas added that it is important for the LPG subsidy scheme to work because indoor or household air pollution is one of the biggest causes of mortality and morbidity in the country.

Bhopal: Cricket Tournament’s Man of the Match Awarded Five Litres of Petrol

The tournament was organised by a Congress leader, in what was yet another innovative attempt to protest the rise if fuel prices.

New Delhi: The Congress’s campaign to protest the rise of fuel prices took another innovative turn after a cricket tournament organised by its Madhya Pradesh leader awarded the man of the match with five litres of petrol.

Fuel prices have reached historic highs in the country since January, with the price of petrol crossing Rs 100 per litre in some cities. The price of LPG cylinders has also been on the rise. The Congress has repeatedly used this to target the BJP government at the Centre, even holding a press conference with cylinders on display.

According to News18, the cricket tournament that culminated on Sunday in Bhopal was organised by Congress leader Manoj Shukla.

A photo that went viral on social media depicted the man of the match of the domestic tournament was awarded five litres of petrol. The played was identified as Salauddin Abbasi.

Also Read: Mamata Banerjee Rides Electric Scooter to State Secretariat to Protest Fuel Price Rise

This “unique protest” follows in the footsteps of others such as a petrol pump in Tamil Nadu’s Karur district offering one-litre of free petrol to children who recited ‘Thirukkural’ couplets without mistake.

In World’s Biggest Early Childcare Scheme, Workers Don’t Even Get Minimum Wage

Karnataka increased the monthly salaries of anganwadi workers to Rs 10,000 last year but the ministry of women and child development has approved only Rs 4,500 – both lower than the workers’ demand.

Mysuru, Tumakuru and Ballari, Karnataka: The mud-and-bamboo anganwadi is about three kilometres from her house, deep inside the Nagarhole National Park and Tiger Reserve in Mysuru district, Karnataka. But little keeps Sita B., a young Yerwa tribe woman, from walking the distance every day to the Manamelkudi village anganwadi, where she works as worker and helper.

On the way, she picks up fresh vegetables and eggs to serve 14 children of the Jenu Kuruba tribe, aged three to six years, registered with the anganwadi. There are nine more children aged six months to three years, and Sita gives them their monthly share of take-home rations under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme of the Government of India.

ICDS is the world’s largest programme for early childhood care and development, with over 158 million children (2011 Census) in the 0-6 years age group, and pregnant and lactating mothers in the country. It offers six services: supplementary nutrition, preschool non-formal education, nutrition and health education, immunisation, health check-up and referral services, through 1.36 million functional anganwadi centres spread across all the districts in the country (as of June 2018).

§

Sita attends to a child in her care. Photo: Nidhi Jamwal

According to the Union health ministry’s Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey 2016-2018, 32.5% of children younger than five years in Karnataka are stunted (lower height for age) and 12.4% are severely stunted. Over 32% are underweight (lower weight for age) and 19.3% are wasted (lower weight for height). A little over 34% of children aged one to four years also have anaemia.

The national scenario isn’t better. The same survey found that 35%, 33% and 17% of children under five in the country are stunted, underweight and wasted, respectively. About 11% of children aged six to 59 months months were in fact found to be acutely malnourished.

The Karnataka state department of women and child development has launched multiple schemes to fight malnutrition and is implementing them through anganwadi centres. For example, under the Ksheera Bhagya scheme, children aged six months to six years receive 150 ml of cream milk five days a week, supplied by the state government at a cost of Rs 124.14 crore per annum.

As part of the Srusti programme, children aged three to six years at anganwadi centres are provided eggs twice a week. Severely malnourished children aged six months to three years are provided eggs three days a week, whereas severely malnourished children aged three years to six years are offered eggs five days a week.

Apart from its 50% share under the ICDS, the Karnataka government gives Rs 11.50 per pregnant and lactating woman under Mathrupoorna, a scheme that grants nutritious meals, counselling and other healthcare facilities to pregnant and lactating women at anganwadi centres for six days a week.

Families with children who have severe acute malnutrition receive Rs 2,000 in medical benefits, plus Rs 1,000 a year for medicine kits at each anganwadi centre in the state.

The data suggests all these schemes together have had appreciable effect. For instance, 36.2% of children under five in Karnataka were stunted according to the 2015-2016 National Family Health Survey and 32.5% in the 2016-2018 survey. Similarly, wasting in children younger than five years has dropped from 26.1% in 2015-2016 to 19.3% in 2016-2018, and the fraction of underweight children has dropped from 35.2% to 32%.

These achievements also highlight the centrality of anganwadi centres – and the women who work there – to the state’s ambitions regarding the health and care of its most vulnerable people.

The ICDS population norms specify one centre for a population of 800 and a mini-anganwadi for a population of 150 to 300. According to the state department of women and child development, Karnataka has 65,911 anganwadi centres: 62,580 are main and 3,331 are mini-centres.

These centres are staffed by frontline health staff: one anganwadi worker and one anganwadi helper each, both typically women. Thus, Karnataka has 65,911 anganwadi workers and 62,580 anganwadi helpers. All the anganwadis together cater to the needs of 3.86 million children between the ages of six months to six years.

§

Two anganwadis of Balle village, a Jenu Kuruba village located inside the Nagarhole National Park, operate out of a tin shed. Photo: Nidhi Jamwal

The tribal village of Manamelkudi is home to 42 Jenu Kuruba tribe families and has a mini-anganwadi centre, where Sita works as worker and helper both.

“I have been working at the Manamelkudi anganwadi for the last five years and am used to walking three kilometres to the centre [every day]. Sometimes I feel scared of tiger or elephant attacks, which are common in [the] forest area,” Sita told The Wire. She receives a monthly honorarium of Rs 4,750.

Managing children, their daily meals, preschool lessons, health and hygiene, and counselling pregnant and lactating mothers isn’t easy because she has to do it all alone. (Per ICDS norms, there can be only one worker-cum-helper per mini-anganwadi.)

However, Sita has been able to make sure the children in her anganwadi eat their meals hot, cooked freshly by her, and drink clean water. She also regularly monitors their growth and records the information in their respective growth charts. Unfortunately, the Manamelkudi anganwadi does not have a toilet.

Not very far away lies Balle, another Jenu Kuruba tribal village lying inside the Nagarhole National Park. It has two anganwadi centres and both function from the same tin-shed structure, without a toilet.

“Our anganwadis [have been] operating since 2010, when they were located inside a government school building,” Pushpa, one of the anganwadi workers. “A few years ago, the school building collapsed but the forest department didn’t permit new construction, so we are functioning out of a tin-shed structure.”

Sharda, the other worker, said the forest department had recently okayed a new anganwadi building and that it was expected to come up soon.

There are about 14 anganwadi centres functioning inside the boundaries of the Nagarhole forest. This isn’t easy. There is a constant threat of animal attack, and the anganwadi workers and helpers come from houses located far away. It is difficult to find educated local tribal women to work at an anganwadi because a worker has to be college-educated and an anganwadi helper has to have studied till at least class IV.

It is women like Sita, Sharda, Pushpa and thousands more who form the backbone of the ICDS scheme.

As it happens, they are not happy.

“We have been demanding the legal minimum wage from the government but the Central government has been deaf to our demands,” S. Varalakshmi, president of the Karnataka State Anganwadi Workers’ Association, told The Wire. “It is not ready to compensate us adequately for the labour and the number of hours we put in.”

In April 2017, Karnataka raised the honoraria for anganwadi workers and helpers from Rs 4,000 and Rs 3,000 a month to Rs 8,000 and Rs 4,000 a month, respectively. The state government also reimburses their medical expenses to the tune of Rs 50,000 a year and provides pension. Additionally, the state department of women and child development has supplied twin-burner stoves, LPG cylinders and water filters to all anganwadi centres in the state.

Last October, the state government decided to further increase the monthly salaries of anganwadi workers and helpers to Rs 10,000 and Rs 5,000, respectively, and of mini-anganwadi to about Rs 6,500. “The state government has sanctioned higher honoraria but the same have not been implemented thus far due to some technical glitches,” Varalakshmi said. “It is expected to be fixed soon.”

However, the Union ministry of women and child development has approved a much lower salary amount. In September 2018, it issued a circular on “enhancement of honorarium” of anganwadi workers from Rs 3,000 per month to Rs 4,500 per month. The pay for anganwadi helpers was raised from Rs 1,500 per month to Rs 2,250 per month. For mini-anganwadi worker-cum-helper, the ministry approved just Rs 3,500 per month.

Varalakshmi alleged the Centre was trying to push the entire burden onto the states. “Earlier, the honorarium for anganwadi workers and helpers was shared between Centre and the states in the ratio of 90:10. Now, the Centre has revised it to 60:40,” she said. According to her, anganwadi workers should get at least Rs 18,000 per month and helpers Rs 9,000 per month. Kerala is the only state that provides minimum wages to all workers. The Goa government offers a monthly salary of about Rs 13,000, and both Haryana and Andhra Pradesh give Rs 11,000 per month.

Is this enough?

Anganwadi workers and helpers in various states, including Karnataka, have been demanding a raise. Last December, anganwadi workers across Karnataka launched a protest against the state government’s decision to start pre-primary classes in government schools. There were protests in Belagavi for delays in the release of incentives for anganwadi workers and helpers.

§

Anganwadi workers and helpers form the backbone of India’s ICDS scheme, and have been demanding minimim wages for their labour. Photo: Nidhi Jamwal

The Karnataka government has a ‘convergence’ programme as part of which it uses funds allocated for the fulfilment of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) to build anganwadi centres in the state.

For example, the anganwadi in Somlara village of Tumakuru district is 14 years old. For the first 12, it operated out of a rented space against a payment of Rs 700 per month. Two years ago, the government erected a new anganwadi building with Rs 6 lakh from MGNREGA funds.

“One of the villagers donated four gunthe of land to construct the anganwadi. Children love the new anganwadi and parents are also happy sending them here,” T.K. Bhagyamma, the anganwadi worker at Somlara, told The Wire.

At Giriyammanapalya village in Madhugiri, Reshma has been managing an anganwadi centre since 2007. “Until April 2018, I was running the anganwadi from a rented place. In May 2018, a new anganwadi building was constructed with MGNREGA fund,” she said.

Indeed, these new buildings are swanky and spacious, with separate kitchens and tiled toilets. Many of them have attached gardens as well, and vegetables grown there are used to prepare meals for the children.

Srikanth, deputy director of the department of women and child development for Tumakuru, said, “We follow a 60:40 ratio – 60% fund is the wage component and 40% is for building materials. The wage component is [obtained] from MGNREGA and the rest … is shared with the Union ministry of women and child development and the state department.”

Thus Tumakuru alone has built 450 anganwadi centres using MGNREGA funds – the highest in the state.

Data from the state department of women and child development suggests a large number of anganwadi centres still continue to function out of rented spaces, such as schools, community halls, etc., but the state expects to cover them under the convergence scheme in a phased manner.

Anganwadi buildings in Karnataka. Source: http://dwcd.kar.nic.in:8080/icds.jsp

But while the government has been modernising anganwadis and introducing new programmes, the workers say their demand for better pay remains unaddressed.

“The labour of women is never seen as labour, but viewed as a service,” Sylvia Karpagam, a public health doctor and researcher and a member of the ‘Right to Food’ campaign in Karnataka, told The Wire. “The language used in the context of their work is ‘honorarium’ and not ‘salary’. This discrimination has to go and they should be treated as employees and not workers or helpers.”

Sundaramma has for the last decade been working as an anganwadi helper at Yerahalli village in H.D. Kote block, Mysuru. A short distance away, at the second anganwadi centre in Yerahalli, Nagaveni has been working as a helper for 17 years. Ask them if they’re satisfied with their salaries and they go quiet.

Gayathri, an anganwadi supervisor in H.D. Kote block, said she oversees a hundred anganwadi centres; Chandibai, a supervisor in Madhugiri block of Tumakuru, said she oversees 68 centres. The norm however is only 25 centres per supervisor.

In February 2019, anganwadi workers marched to the Parliament in Delhi to protest against the Centre’s reluctance to increase their pay and pension. In October the same year, anganwadi workers and helpers in Jharkhand protested demanding higher salaries.

In a country with such high malnutrition, it’s important to acknowledge the crucial role these women play as frontline health workers. Without them and their labour, the world’s largest programme to ensure good quality early childhood care and development would flop.

Nidhi Jamwal is the environment editor of Gaon Connection, India’s largest rural media platform.

LPG Cylinders See Biggest Hike in Six Years; Subsidy Also Increased

Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala said the Union government had “struck the pockets of the public with current”.

New Delhi: The price of non-subsidised liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders was sharply hiked by Rs 144.5 by state-run oil marketing companies on Wednesday.

As per Indian Oil, which supplies 30 lakh Indane cylinders daily all over India, a 14.2 kg non-subsidised LPG cylinder now costs Rs 858.5 in New Delhi, reported LiveMint.

According to the report, this was the sharpest hike in the price of non-subsidised LPG cylinder prices since January 2014, when prices had been increased by Rs 220 to cost Rs 1,241 per cylinder.

In Kolkata, cylinder prices were increased by Rs 149 to Rs 896, in Mumbai by Rs 145 to Rs 829.5 and in Chennai by Rs 147 to Rs 881.

However, the government has, to shield domestic households, also almost doubled the subsidy for domestic users from Rs 153.86 per cylinder to Rs 291.48, according to a report in The Hindu. Domestic users are entitled to get 12 cylinders of 14.2 kg each in a year at subsidised rates.

Additionally, the subsidy for the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) beneficiaries has been increased from Rs 174.86 to Rs 312.48 per cylinder. Hence, the subsidised 14.2-kg cylinders would cost Rs 567.02 for domestic users and Rs 546.02 for the PMUY beneficiaries.

In India, the price of LPG cylinders depends primarily on the international benchmark rate of LPG and the currency exchange rate between the US dollar and the rupee.

Also read: Modi’s Gas for the Poor Scheme Marred by Data Inflation, Poor Implementation

In the recently presented budget, the Centre increased the total allocation for providing subsidised fuel, especially LPG and kerosene, by 6% to Rs 40,915.21 crore. The allocation for LPG subsidy was increased to Rs 37,256.21 crore from the revised estimate of Rs 34,085.86 crore for the current year.

However, the allocation for kerosene subsidy was reduced to Rs 3,659 crore for the next year from the revised estimate of Rs 4,483 crore for the current year.

Parties react to the sharp hike

The development came a day after the Delhi assembly election results were announced

In response to the price hike, the Congress party demanded that the increase be rolled back and accused the Centre of ‘electrocuting’ household budgets.

“Modiji increased the price by Rs 144. Cooking gas price has been increased by Rs 200 in one year from 2019-2020,” said chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala.

Congress spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala addresses a press conference at AICC in New Delhi on February 21, 2019. Credit: PTI/Arun Sharma

“While talking about current, they have struck the pockets of the public with current,” said Surjewala.

“We demand this, on behalf of the Indian National Congress, that as the price of the international crude oil has fallen, why should there be such surreptitious and uncalled for increase in the price of gas cylinder. This increase in the price should immediately be rolled back,” he said.

The Congress party’s women wing has also decided to protest the price hike.

Trinamool Congress and the CPI(M) too attacked the Union government for the increase in prices and further alleged that the move was a vengeful response to the party’s poor performance in the recently concluded Delhi assembly elections

Also read: The Poor Got LPG Cylinders Under Modi’s Scheme But They Can’t Afford Gas Refills

“The BJP is an anti-people party and its decisions and policies are a reflection of that. Despite its series of defeats in several Assembly polls, they are yet to learn their lessons,” TMC secretary-general Partha Chatterjee said.

CPI(M) legislative party leader Sujan Chakraborty said, “They are trying to take revenge for the defeat in the Delhi assembly polls. Just because people did not vote in BJP’s favour, they are punishing them by increasing the LPG price”.

BSP chief Mayawati too called the price hike a “cruel decision” against the poor.

BJP state chief Dilip Ghosh, however, contended that the hike was unrelated to the recent polls and that “LPG prices increase and decrease periodically”.

We Need to Fix Household Cooking and Heating Emissions to Beat Air Pollution

While the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana is an important effort, there are many barriers to LPG uptake that won’t go away when simply presented with alternatives.

Air pollution is a public health emergency in India. Air pollution reduces our life expectancy by at least 1.5 years, is the leading cause of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, and is worsening our quality of life. In India, pollution levels have risen consistently since the 1990s, with cities on the Indo-Gangetic plain regularly featuring on the list of the world’s most polluted. Given the year-round high pollution levels across the country, there is now a growing political acknowledgement that we need to act urgently.

Of the most common sources of air pollution in India, biomass and coal used for cooking and heating and kerosene for lighting – collectively household emissions – is among the top five, followed by power plants and other industries, resuspended dust, passenger and freight transport, and open waste burning.

In India, ~673,000 premature deaths a year are linked to outdoor air pollution. Of this, up to 30% are linked to household emissions, per a policy brief published by the Collaborative Clean Air Policy Centre. An additional 480,000 premature deaths a year are attributed to exposure inside the houses. These deaths are the result of, as well as reassert, the link between air pollution and respiratory diseases, heart disease, stroke, lung cancer and diabetes. However, air pollution control efforts have for the most part not dealt with this source.

A peer-reviewed paper published on May 28 sheds more light on the significance of household emissions. Its authors found that if this source was eliminated completely, the national average PM2.5 concentration will come close to the national ambient standards.

The paper’s results also highlight another critical aspect of air pollution: emissions typically affect air quality over regional scales. Tackling pollution in a city like Delhi or Kanpur or Nagpur will need us to tackle the major sources that contribute to air quality in their ‘airshed’, which typically includes industrial emissions, vehicle exhaust, dust and burning garbage. But by applying a city-centric lens to pollution, like the National Clean Air Programme does, we neglect air pollution in the rural areas and ultimately limit the extent to which the air quality inside cities can be improved by ignoring sources outside their borders.

The household sector is a non-point source: each household includes many individual ‘polluters’ with modest contributions but together are a bigger problem. So tackling household emissions will require concerted action: access to clean fuels, well-targeted incentives or subsidies, behavioural nudges and awareness campaigns.

The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas took an important first step with the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) in 2016, providing LPG connections to the poorest households. As of June 2019, PMUY has apparently connected 7.2 crore beneficiaries (although the data is marred by inflation) by directly transferring subsidies to the bank accounts of women in these households. The ‘give it up’ campaign to voluntarily say ‘no’ to LPG subsidies has also helped divert much-needed funds from urban to rural consumers.

New LPG connections under PMUY, according to data released by the government. The have been reports of data inflation. Photo: Urban Emissions

New LPG connections under PMUY, according to data released by the government. The have been reports of data inflation. Photo: Urban Emissions

Of the 24.3 crore households surveyed in the last Census, 7 crore used LPG as the primary cooking fuel. Between existing and new customers, let’s assume that half of India’s households have access to LPG for cooking. In the process, India has become the world’s second largest LPG importer: according to the petroleum ministry, net imports tripled from 4.3 to 12.7 million metric tonnes between 2010 and 2018.

By all accounts, PMUY should be considered an important mitigation effort. A two-phase survey by the Council of Energy Environment and Water, New Delhi, found that access to LPG among rural households between 2015 and 2018 increased 42% in Bihar, 30% in Jharkhand, 34% in Madhya Pradesh, 20% in Odisha, 36% in Uttar Pradesh and 50% in West Bengal. More than half of those newly connected were PMUY beneficiaries.

However, ensuring LPG is used continuously is a challenge. Firewood and dung cakes are plentiful and cheap, and traditional taste preferences are attached to food cooked on chulhas, so households have to be persuaded to change their preferences; just presenting new options won’t do.

For example, a RICE institute study found that 85% of PMUY beneficiaries it surveyed in rural Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan continued to use chulhas. The barriers to LPG adoption included cost of refills, difficulty transporting heavy cylinders in areas without proper roads, socio-economic aspects (such as women gathering biomass for fuel and not being the primary decision-makers at home) and cultural preferences for food cooked on wood stoves.

At the same time, it’s important to not blame those using biomass. There are geographic factors that encourage its use. For example, winters in northern India can be very severe; for those living without electricity, a chulha is often the difference between life and death. Instead, this is a plea to policymakers to offer alternatives so that both cooking and heating needs are met in a way that doesn’t contribute to outdoor air pollution.

Further, LPG is just one option; we need to be creative and offer other alternatives in areas where access to LPG is difficult. Solar stoves and heaters, or even efficient wood heaters, will be necessary. In cities like Delhi, where a major part of the emissions is from small (and controlled) fires in residential communities that security guards, support staff and homeless people light to keep themselves warm, an electrical heater will help.

The bottomline is that the government needs to recognise the main reasons for biomass use in Indian households are socio-economic and cultural, and promote policies that provide access to alternative fuels. The PMUY is only the start. We need to address factors currently in the way of wider uptake before the positive impact on the air pollution can be felt.

Sarath Guttikunda is the director of Urban Emissions (India), an independent research group on air pollution, issuing three-day air quality forecasts for all Indian districts. Santosh Harish is a fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi. He tweets at @santoshharish1. The views expressed here are personal.

Bengaluru Will Not Breathe Better Air Even With 44,000 Air Purifiers

We never improve air pollution by sucking pollutants out of the atmosphere.

Governments at all levels in India have a tricky problem on their hands, or so they think. Air pollution levels are rising in every village and city in the country, and people are demanding action. They want something done. They want their voices heard. They want improvements. And they want to breathe cleaner air.

There are many ideas to improve air quality. Some of them have been tossed around for a couple of decades now. An action plan the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) published in 1997 found its way after 20 years into the hands of the Delhi government.

These are not overnight solutions. They include improving infrastructure, urban transport and solid waste management. As a result, it requires patience, long-term planning, interdepartmental cooperation and, most importantly, joint action by all political parties, since the implementation and outcomes can have a considerable time lag. All straightforward – but not simple to pull off.

This is why technological gimmicks that promise overnight improvements without any reduction in emissions, systemic policy changes or infrastructural improvement are bound to be disingenuous, and a waste of important resources. And this is exactly what the multiple proposals to install air purifiers at intersections to reduce ambient air pollution are.

We cannot improve air pollution by sucking pollutants out of the atmosphere. The only way to control pollution is by controlling pollutants entering the atmosphere – i.e. by controlling emissions.

In 2016 when authorities in Delhi planned to install and test air purifiers in the city, we wrote on The Wire, “Installing an air filter in public is more like avoiding the problem and diverting attention away than solving it.”

In September 2018, the Delhi government installed 70 purifiers it called “Wind Augmentation Purifying Units”, or WAYU, to reduce pollution during the winter. But for all the fanfare and hype, there appears to be no account or of what happened to them. Moreover, the data suggests that the amount of air pollution did not decline, certainly not in a way that could be attributed to the WAYUs.

In February this year, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) – the city’s municipal authority – announced a similar tactic. It has installed one purifier thus far and has proposed to install one at each of the 44,000 intersections in the city. Each of these units cost Rs 2.5 lakh.

Setting aside the expenditure for a moment: simple science and experience with similar projects implies that this move just won’t work. You cannot use purifiers to address a serious urban planning issue. Bringing the cost back into the picture: It is also not fair to the people to spend money that will have no impact on the ambient air pollution.

Rs 2.5 lakh per unit for 44,000 units is Rs 1,100 crore. Here’s a short list of what else such money can buy and which will actually help:

  • 550 regulatory grade multi-pollutant continuous monitoring stations, at Rs 2 crore apiece
  • 5,500 regulatory grade PM2.5 continuous monitoring stations, at Rs 20 lakh apiece
  • 4.4 lakh low-cost validated PM2.5 sensors, at Rs 25,000 apiece
  • 550 electric buses for public transport, at Rs 2 crore apiece
  • 2,200 BS-6 standard diesel buses for public transport, at Rs 50 lakh apiece
  • 22,000 electric three-wheelers, at Rs 5 lakh apiece
  • 27,500 BS-6 standard 3-wheelers, at Rs 4 lakh apiece
  • 11,000 small-scale solar kits, at Rs 10 lakh per 10 kW
  • 2,200 km of paved roads with room for some greenery, at Rs 50 lakh per km
  • 2.2 crore LPG cylinders, at Rs 500 per connection
  • 1,100 new waste-collection trucks, at Rs 1 crore apiece

But considering the government simply wants to spend its money in flashier ways, we but return to the only other reasonable course of action: controlling emissions. For example, the five things that every city needs on this count are:

  1. Better public transport and walking, cycling infrastructure
  2. Lower waste generation and better waste collection and management processes
  3. Well-maintained roads, greener pavements, laws enforced at construction sites to reduce dust
  4. Legislation and improvements to emission control technologies at all industrial units
  5. Better data collection and dissemination so people can track changes in air quality

All these will take many years, and lots of planning, to get right. If we start with constructive changes now, our cities will be eminently liveable in a decade or two. But in the meantime, we cannot afford to keep making the same mistakes over and over: refusing to implement action plans, instead seeking out band-aids like purifiers if only to show that the government is up to something.

As it stands, a plan to install 44,000 air purifiers at intersections is and will remain merely a ribbon-cutting gimmick, and perhaps open up more space for advertisements.

Sarath Guttikunda is the director of Urban Emissions (India), an independent research group on air pollution, issuing three-day air quality forecasts for all Indian districts.