‘Our Land Is No Use Any More’: India’s Struggle to Save Its Farms

Land degradation and climate change are posing major threats to India’s economy and farmers.

Gurugram: A highway leading from Gurugram – a technology and business hub south of New Delhi – cuts through swaths of empty plots, land that once contained fertile green fields, but which is now mostly barren and dotted with cranes towering over unfinished buildings.

A real estate boom fuelled by rapid economic growth in recent years has transformed thousands of hectares of arable land in the region into plots for glass-and-steel high-rises.

Scientists describe such land as being degraded. The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) defines land degradation as “the temporary or permanent lowering of the productive capacity of land”.

In other words, it becomes increasingly difficult to grow crops on such land. And if it is not stopped, the process can lead to desertification.

The UN estimates that more than 3.2 billion people around the world are at risk from the effects of land degradation, many of whom live in the world’s poorest regions. And, according to an Indian government-backed study, land degradation led to a roughly 2.5% loss of the country’s economic output between 2014 and 2015.

This is a problem India can ill afford. Its economy is slowing, unemployment is near record highs and more than 40 percent of its workforce is engaged in agriculture. The government has promised to tackle land degradation, but critics say its proposed solutions do not go far enough.

Land degradation is a phenomenon that Pappu, a labourer who brings his cattle to graze on what vegetation remains on the outskirts of Gurugram, knows all too well. He first came here several years ago from the neighbouring state of Rajasthan, forced to move when yields on his farm fell because of the rising salinity of the water supply.

Also read: Climate Change Poses Serious Threats to India’s Food Security

“Everything was fine and our yields were enough to sustain the family until this happened,” Pappu, who is 50 and goes by one name, told Al Jazeera. He said most of the farmers in his village in Rajasthan gave up agriculture and migrated to Gurugram where they took up jobs as security guards, construction workers and day labourers.

“Our land [in Rajasthan] is of no use any more. We could never have sustained our families if we didn’t come to the city,” Pappu said.

But the prognosis for the health of the land around Gurugram doesn’t appear to be too rosy either.

According to government data, nearly 30% of the land in India, or about 97 million hectares, is degraded. That is an area about the size of northern Europe.

Causes and effects

A major cause of land degradation is human activity. The World Health Organisation (WHO) cites “increasing and combined pressures of agricultural and livestock production (over-cultivation, overgrazing, forest conversion), urbanisation [and] deforestation” as leading causes. Construction activity and the overuse of pesticides and chemical fertilisers for farming are also seen as contributors.

Following famines in the late 1940s, fertilisers and pesticides helped India transform its agriculture sector by the early 1960s, a development that has come to be known as the Green Revolution. Ironically, the same chemicals have also had damaging effects on the soil.

“We have reached a state where fertilisers have been used so much that it has led to a degradation of land quality,” Saudamini Das, an economist at the Institute of Economic Growth in New Delhi, told Al Jazeera.

But the WHO says “extreme weather events such as droughts and coastal surges which salinate land” also contribute to the loss of land productivity. This year, India witnessed the second-driest pre-monsoon season in more than 60 years, leading to droughts in its northwestern and southern states.

This is where causes and effects start to drive one another, making land degradation an intractable problem the world over.

Also read: Climate Change: People of Asia’s Mountains Face Severe Food Insecurity

“The socioeconomic effects of climate change … exacerbate land degradation,” Ibrahim Thiaw, executive secretary of the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), which is holding its 14th Conference of Parties (COP14) in New Delhi, told Al Jazeera.

The loss of land productivity can, in turn, contribute to climate change as the loss of plants makes it harder to draw excess carbon dioxide from the air.

“Land degradation is a driver of climate change through emission of greenhouse gases and reduced rates of carbon uptake,” the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said in a report published last month.

Sunita Narain, director of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in New Delhi, said: “Land degradation and desertification in an age of climate change is a different animal, unlike in earlier times.”

“In India, [this trend] is a cause of land and water mismanagement, and it is now exacerbated by climate change events,” Narain told Al Jazeera.

Land degradation can also have more direct effects on people’s lives.

The UN FAO says land degradation can lead to a drop in people’s incomes, result in dwindling food supplies, meaning more effort, time, and money are needed to achieve a sustainable level of crop yields.

Low farm output, owing to low productivity, can drive food prices higher, squeezing the livelihoods of people already on the margins.

Ultimately, many people in rural areas, like Pappu, are forced to leave their homes in search of jobs in cities, adding to the pressure on stretched urban resources.

In other cases, some farmers decide the only way out is to take their own lives. In the two decades leading up to 2015, more than 321,000 farmers committed suicide, according to national crime records, though debts and falling crop prices are likely to have added to the psychological stress of low farm yields.

The effects of land degradation on entire economies can also be significant.

India’s economy is growing at a six-year low of about 5%, and experts are warning of a gathering rural slowdown with falling wage growth and record-high unemployment rates. The fact that close to half of India’s workforce is engaged in agriculture makes the country’s economy particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and land degradation.

“Whenever you create stress on land, the shockwave affects millions of people. And here you see a very clear correlation. [For instance], years of drought lead to years of economic downturn. And this downturn is sudden,” the UNCCD’s Thiaw said.

“India’s growing middle class would need increasing resources going forward and [this] would make more demand on land to deliver energy, water and fibre. India should start restoring its land or else it would affect its economy in the long run,” he added.

Action against degradation

So what can governments and individuals do to restore their lands to health?

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said his government would commit to restoring 5 million hectares of degraded land by 2030, in addition to a previous commitment of 21 million hectares.

But the UN says that would not be enough. It says India needs to restore at least 30 million hectares in the next 10 years to reverse land degradation by 2030.

At the COP14 summit in New Delhi, the UN pointed out that the funds made available by governments to restore land globally are insufficient and called for more investments from the private sector.

A much bigger challenge is likely to be getting governments to agree to joint action.

US President Donald Trump’s decision in 2017 to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement has helped divide opinion about climate change and its effects, analysts say.

Also read: Interview | ‘We’re Finally Talking About Solutions on the Scale of the Crisis We Face’: Naomi Klein

“There are powerful voices shaking multilateralism but [I’d say] that there is no alternative to it. The planet is burning, our food supplies are being jeopardised. You ask yourself that, where are we going? We cannot continue to exploit our planet for the rest of any president’s term or political party,” said Thiaw.

The Centre for Science and Environment’s Narain said that instead of asking for more private investments to restore lands, the global community should work towards giving greater land rights to the tribal communities who own these lands, and called upon the UN to work on a broader climate agenda by including them, who she says have suffered immensely from climate change.

“As far as money and finances are concerned, I think the world is extremely selfish,” Narain said. “If the world cannot accept [and identify] with the victims of climate change today, then I think we are dealing with a global leadership that is defunct.”

But the choices we all make every day as consumers could also have a major impact on those suffering from degraded lands.

The IPCC in its report last month, titled Climate Change and Land, said better land management and the consumption of healthier diets can help address climate change and its effects.

“We need to look at how we can reduce emissions from land and how we can use it to cause carbon removal,” Joanna House, one of the report’s lead authors told Al Jazeera.

The report stresses the importance of reducing food waste, eating less meat and more grains, vegetables and nuts.

“Underlying this report is the fact that a relatively small number of giant meat, agribusiness and biofuel companies are responsible for the bulk of deforestation and other climate pollution in the agriculture sector,” said Glenn Hurowitz, CEO of global campaign group Mighty Earth.

This story originally appeared in Al Jazeera. It is republished here as part of The Wire‘s partnership with Covering Climate Now, a global collaboration of more than 250 news outlets to strengthen coverage of the climate story.

Climate Change: People of Asia’s Mountains Face Severe Food Insecurity

In only five years since 2012, the rural mountain population vulnerable to food-related insecurity increased by 12%.

Shifting precipitation patterns, increasing urbanisation, groundwater depletion, fading springs and land-use change – these are just a few of the issues assailing mountainous regions in developing countries around the world.

Food self-sufficiency is an important first step to achieving food and nutrition security. But many mountain communities – especially in the Indian Himalaya – are unlucky on this count. According to a new assessment, between 2012 and 2017, the rural mountain population vulnerable to food-related insecurity increased from 307 million to 346 million people – i.e. by 12% in only five years.

Researchers released the study on September 12, at the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, Land Degradation and Drought (UNCCD) in Greater Noida, near Delhi. The report was prepared by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation and the UNCCD’s Global Mechanism team.

Additionally, between 2012 and 2017, the Asian mountain population increased 8.1% to 579 million but the number of people vulnerable to food-related insecurity declined at 7.5%. Asia also logged the highest increase among continents in the number of vulnerable people: 44 million.

“Of the 240 million people that live in the Hindu Kush Himalayan region, a third live below the poverty line, 30% do not have enough to eat and 50% suffer from some form of malnutrition,” Dhrupad Choudhury, a programme manager at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Nepal, told The Wire.

Nearly 50 million people reside among the Himalayan mountains, and almost 1.5 billion depend on these mountains for water, food and energy. The Indian Himalayan Region spans Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura and parts of Assam and West Bengal. The situation is the same in all of the Hindu Kush Himalayan countries.

The mountain communities suffer due to either too much or too little water, and face extreme events more often. Himalayan populations are also remote, hardly accessible and depend more on natural resources. The more the latter are depleted, the poorer and more vulnerable these people become, according to the report.

For example, about 70% of Bhutan is steep slope dryland; a third of the agricultural land is located on steep slopes; and over half of Bhutan’s population depends on agricultural even though the entire country is mountainous. Food insecurity, as a result, is not hard to imagine.

Also read: Forget Countdowns – Climate Catastrophe Has Started in the High Mountains of Asia

The report presents a similar case study from Nepal, where around 35% of the 14 million people living in the country’s mountainous parts don’t have assured long-term food supply. Agriculture employs two-thirds of Nepal’s workforce and contributes to one-third of its GDP. A report that set targets for land degradation neutrality specified that 118 sq. km of forest cover was converted for other use between 2000 to 2010, and that 4% of the country is in a state of declining productivity.

Land degradation is a major environmental problem, especially in the form of erosion, landslides and floods. Similarly, loss of vegetation due to deforestation, over-harvesting forest products, unsustainable fuel-wood extraction, shifting cultivation, encroachment into forestland, forest fires and overgrazing are the principal drivers of the degradation of forest lands.

Another common problem across the Himalaya, as Choudhury highlighted, is the expanding presence of irrigated rice varieties even at higher altitudes at the cost of the local agro-diversity. This doesn’t only disrupt the “protein-calorie balance” but also exposes farmers who have stopped growing the variety they once used to to the vagaries of nature more. The more diverse crops are cultivated, the more resilient the farmer’s industry is in the face of unpredictable weather. “And with this, they are also losing their vast traditional knowledge of dietary diversity,” he said.

Then there is increasing urbanisation: all new urban centres in the Hindu-Kush Himalaya are being built mostly on arable land – an already scarce commodity on mountains. This in turn could affect long-term food independence, experts warned.

Choudhury said that while 70% of farms situated on plains are irrigated while the remainder are rain-fed, the situation is exactly the opposite in the mountains: 65% of agriculture is rain-fed and 35% is irrigated. And “differences in the mountains and the plains demand different strategies for ensuring water security.”

Krishnan Singh Rautela, of the Integrated Mountain Initiative, a pan-Indian Himalaya consortium, also complained about the land in the hills becoming increasingly fragmented and that agriculture in the mountains is no longer considered to be economically viable. “But with intelligent planning, we can ensure reverse migration,” he said. “Growing of high value commercial/horticulture crop, say mushrooms, can be one option.”

The report finally recommended that officials develop national and regional partnership to build consensus on ways “to monitor vulnerability and document the impact of mountain stressors.” It also suggested taking advantage of existing financial resources within the framework of the UN’s sustainable development goals.

Nivedita Khandekar is an independent journalist based in Delhi. She writes on environmental and developmental issues. Follow her on Twitter at @nivedita_him.

Narendra Modi Announces Increase in India’s Land Restoration Target at UN Conference

The prime minister’s announcement is an improvement over the figure quoted by Prakash Javadekar, but lower than the number that the environment ministry had earlier decided upon.

New Delhi: On Monday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the 14th Conference of Parties (COP 14) of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), being held in Greater Noida since September 2. He spoke broadly on the threats posed by climate change including the loss of biodiversity and land degradation – which are the focus areas of this conference.

Outlining India’s resolve to combat the threats of land degradation and loss of biodiversity, Modi invoked the country’s spiritual connection with land. “In Indian culture, the Earth is held sacred and treated as the Mother. While getting up in the morning, when we touch the earth with our feet we seek the forgiveness of Mother Earth by praying,” he said.

An increase, a decrease and another increase

Modi announced that India will be increasing its land restoration target “from 21 million hectares to 26 million hectares”. This target, the prime minister said, will be achieved by 2030 to aid India in reaching land degradation neutrality, as required by the UNCCD.

Also read | Desertification Costs World Economy up to $15 Trillion: UN

There has been a degree of confusion regarding India’s land restoration target. Down to Earth has pointed out that the Ministry for Environment, Forests and Climate Change decided on June 17 at the Land Degradation Neutrality Target Setting Programme that it will be setting a target of restoring 30 million hectares of degraded land.

On August 28, however, at the curtain raiser for the COP 14, minister in charge Prakash Javadekar said that the target figure was substantially lower, at five million hectares.

Thus, Modi’s announcement is an improvement over the figure quoted by Javadekar, but lower than the figure that the ministry had earlier decided on.

Even the 26-million-hectare target which has now been set by Modi is only 27% of the land that is already degraded in India. According to a 2016 study by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), 96 million hectares of land area in the country already stands degraded.

Counting India’s tree cover

Speaking at the conference, Modi also claimed that India increased its tree cover by 0.8 million hectares between 2015 and 2017. “In cases where there is any diversion of forest land, that has to be compensated by afforestation and a monetary payment is also made,” he said.

Also read | How Did India End up Staring at a Water-Uncertain Future?

India’s data on tree and forest cover has come in for questioning, including by the UN itself, as Business Standard reported this January. It had found that the tree cover data submitted by India was lacking transparency and clarity. “The data and information used by India in constructing its FRL are partially transparent and not complete and therefore not fully in accordance with the guidelines contained,” a UN review said of the data provided by India.

Experts and academics have also raised eyebrows at the government’s claim that the tree cover in India has increased. They have said that India has erroneously included commercial plantations in its tree and forest cover data.

The ZBNF impact

Modi also claimed that measures such as micro irrigation and the government’s promotion of zero budget natural farming (ZBNF) will lead to the restoration of degraded land and minimise further erosion.

However, as The Wire has reported earlier, no scientific studies have been completed on the effectiveness of ZBNF in achieving any of what the government claims it can. Government-funded research institutes are in the process of testing its effectiveness on various parameters, including its impact on soil quality, which is relevant here given Modi’s claim that ZBNF can help achieve the goal of land degradation neutrality.

Modi also used the platform to underline his government’s commitment to ending the use of single-use plastic. “Menace of plastic waste will also lead to land degradation and it will be irreversible. We will put an end to single use plastic in the coming years. The time has come for world to say goodbye to single use plastic,” he said.