Benjamin Netanyahu Government Moves to Ban Al Jazeera in Israel

Al Jazeera has been instrumental in bringing news from the besieged Palestinian area because foreign journalists are banned from entering Gaza. 

New Delhi: The Israeli parliament, Knesset, has passed a law that gives the government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the power to ban, among other television channels, the news outlet Al Jazeera which has been bringing ground reports on the daily realities of the Israeli strike on Gaza.

Prime Minister Netanyahu posted on X saying that he would “act immediately” to close the network’s local office. The auto-translation of his Hebrew post runs thus:

Al Jazeera harmed Israel’s security, actively participated in the October 7 massacre, and incited against IDF soldiers. It is time to remove the shofar of Hamas from our country.

The terrorist channel Al Jazeera will no longer broadcast from Israel. I intend to act immediately in accordance with the new law to stop the channel’s activity.

I welcome the law promoted by Communications Minister Shlomo Karai with the support of coalition members led by coalition chairman Ofir Katz.

Al Jazeera has been instrumental in bringing news from the besieged Palestinian area because foreign journalists are banned from entering Gaza.

“Al Jazeera staff based in the strip have been some of the only reporters able to cover the war on the ground,” the BBC noted. Some of them have undergone injuries and grave personal losses while covering the war.

Among them is Wael Al-Dahdouh, who is a bureau chief in Gaza, and who lost several members of his family – including his children – in the air strikes, working throughout. Al Jazeera has accused the Israeli government of targeting and killing Al-Dahdouh’s journalist son Hamza Al-Dahdouh.

The Knesset’s bill will allow the government to ban, for 45 days at a time, any foreign network which is considered a threat to national security. The ban can be renewed.

The law would stay in force until July or until the end of significant fighting in Gaza, BBC reported.

The Al Jazeera Media Network has issued a statement saying Netanyahu’s comments against the news organisation are “lies” and has held him responsible for the safety of its staff around the world. It added:

“Netanyahu could not find any justifications to offer the world for his ongoing attacks on Al Jazeera and press freedom except to present new lies and inflammatory slanders against the Network and the rights of its employees…Al Jazeera holds the Israeli Prime Minister responsible for the safety of its staff and Network premises around the world, following his incitement and this false accusation in a disgraceful manner.”

Al Jazeera is headquartered in Qatar.

Israel has previously banned a smaller Lebanese channel, Al Mayadeen, BBC additionally reported.

The US has said that the reports are concerning. The US has continued to transfer arms to Israel, through its strikes, and gives $ 3.8 billion in annual military assistance to it.

“We believe in the freedom of the press. It is critically important. The United States supports the critically important work journalists around the world do, and that includes those who are reporting on the conflict in Gaza. If those reports are true, it is concerning to us,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said, according to The Times of Israel.

Do ‘Targets’ of the Israel Security Agency Face Close Supervision or Enjoy Immunity?

The title that the Israeli media attaches to suspects of far-right terrorism – “a target of the Shin Bet” – sometimes means exactly the opposite of what we think.

Elisha Yered, the former spokesman for Israeli Member of the Knesset (Israel’s Parliament) Limor Son Har-Melech from the far-right Otzma-Yehudit party, is suspected of obstruction of the police’s investigation and aiding the murder of 19-year-old Qosai Jammal Mi’tan from the village Burqa, near Ramallah in the West Bank. Israeli media reports stated that Yered is a “target of the Shin Bet”, the acronym of the Israel Security Agency.

Apparently, it can be understood from the combination of the words “target of the Shin Bet” that this is a person whose dangerousness is already known to the Israeli security services and he is under their close supervision and treated by them seriously. But in practice, this often means that this person enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution and can continue to freely harm the bodies and property of Palestinian civilians until the Shin Bet decides that he has crossed a red line.

On March 2023, five months before the murder of Mi’tan, Israel’s attorney general advocate Gali Beharev-Miara gave her exceptional approval for the criminal investigation of a member of the Knesset on suspicion of inciting terrorism, for his statements about the “burning of Huwara” (Zvika Fogel, also from Otzma-Yehudit), the Palestinian village where a pogrom was carried out by the Israeli far right. However, even though Elisha Yered tweeted similar things and even distributed a video of incitement, he has yet to be investigated.

The police suspect that after Mi’tan’s murder, Yered took the weapon with which Yehiel Indore allegedly shot Mi’tan, and buried it in the lands of the Ramat Migron outpost where he lives. After the police arrived at his house, Yered led them to the buried weapon. Despite this, it was reported that an indictment is not expected to be filed against Yered.

According to the Israeli Criminal Procedure law, if the police learn of the commission of a crime, they must open an investigation, but when it comes to a “target of the Shin Bet” many times the obligation in the law is not met and the far-right activists are not investigated and prosecuted. It is not only about political considerations of the law enforcement authorities but also because of the fear of exposing intelligence agents and sources.

It is not known how many of the hundreds who are believed to belong to the “Hilltop Youth” who are responsible for most of the Israeli far right terrorist incidents in the West Ban – and Elisha Yered is identified with them – are agents or collaborators of the Shin Bet. In the US, for example, it became clear in retrospect that during the years of political persecution carried out by the head of the FBI J. Edgar Hoover, out of about 5,000 members of the American Communist Party – about 1,500 were agents and collaborators of the FBI.

J. Edgar Hoover. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/FBI, Public Domain

The car of the Shin Bet

This is how, for example, violence was allowed to deteriorate in the plant nursery of Muhammad Mahmada, near the village of As-Sawiya in the West Bank. Between 2021 and 2022, Mahmada suffered from repeated incidents of theft and vandalism by “Hilltop Youth” who repeatedly came to his plant nursery, using the same vehicle. The far-right activists and their vehicle were clearly visible in the plant nursery’s security camera footage, and the settlement Ariel police received a report that some of the stolen trees were planted at the entrance to the Rehelim settlement, and that the vehicle used in the incidents was seen in that settlement. They were not arrested. The law was not enforced on them.

In the end, Mahmada managed to catch the far-right activists on his own, the fifth time they came to his plant nursery to carry out their plan. Although it is the same cell of “Hilltop Youth” that operated, the prosecution unit filed only one indictment against one of them, and only on one of the recurring incidents. The charge was for theft, the defendant was not attributed membership of a terrorist organisation, nor a racial motive.

The reason for the unusual conduct was revealed in an investigation published by the Israeli journalist Elisha Ben-Kimon on February 4, 2022 – the vehicle used in the chain of incidents in Mahmada’s plant nursery belonged to the Shin Bet. A Shin Bet agent who was implanted in the cell of the “Hilltop Youth” participated in the incidents.

In response to the complaint submitted to Israel’s deputy state prosecutor for special duties against the Shin Bet, on June 2022, he said that “recently a response was received from some of the parties to whom the complaint was forwarded. In view of the content of the response received, it was decided to deepen the investigation and forward your request to additional parties in order to exhaust the investigation. Another update will be sent after all the responses have been examined and when a decision has been made on them.” Mahmada has been waiting for this decision for over a year.

And so, the Israel Police continued to act negligently, did not recognise the incidents as terrorist incidents, and the deputy state prosecutor for special duties continued to drag his feet in investigating the conduct of the Shin Bet. Therefore, perhaps it is no wonder that on the morning of December 19, 2022, a sixth incident took place at Mahmada’s plant nursery, which was a step up in violence. The “Hilltop Youth” cell arrived again, made a hole in the wall of the building with a hammer and entered through it, stole the security camera and associated apparatus and other property and set fire to the building. Worst of all, they tried to insert a gas tank into the building they set fire to. The gas tank got stuck in the hole they made in the wall. Only by a miracle did the gas tank nor the whole building explode.

Representative image of the Israel Palestine frontier. Photo: Jürg Fraefel/Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Does the Shin Bet’s method work?

Back to Elisha Yered: a review of additional investigation files shows that the Yered and Mahmada cases are not unusual, and this Shin Bet method is also used for other far-right activists. The Shin Bet regularly gathers information about the terrorist activities of the far-right activists, through agents and collaborators and also in other ways, but refrains from stopping such activity in real-time or sharing evidence with the police that would allow them to be prosecuted – except in exceptional cases.

In this way, when one of the “Hilltop Youth” is taken for questioning, the Shin Bet investigators can lay out before him all the terrorist incidents that they know he was involved in over the years. The “surprised” suspect can “choose” whether to admit his involvement in the specific incident for which he was arrested or be prosecuted for the multitude of terror incidents that the Shin Bet knows about – and sometimes to consider whether to become a collaborator of the Shin Bet.

This also emerges from the facts of the indictment filed against Amiram Ben Uliel who was convicted of murdering the members of the Dawabsha family by setting on fire their home in the West Bank town of Duma, south of Nablus, while they were sleeping. There it is stated that he was known to the Shin Bet and operated for two years prior to the incident as part of a new terror cell of far-right activists who sought to promote an extreme and violent ideological concept aimed at destabilising the State of Israel through the use of terrorism and violence, including killings.

In other words, it is implied in the indictment filed against Ben Uliel that the Shin Bet did not stop his terror cell in real time. At a closed conference of the Likud Party’s youth in Tel Aviv, the then minister of defence Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon admitted that the security services knew who was responsible for the attack on the Dawabsha family’s home but avoided prosecuting him so as not to reveal intelligence sources in the court. In the end, in view of the tremendous public and political pressure exerted on Israel following the shock of the murder of parents and their one-and-a-half-year-old son, an indictment was filed against Ben Uliel and another suspect.

Does this modus operandi of the Shin Bet reduce Israeli far-right terrorism or encourage it and give such activists a free hand? Since there is no transparency regarding the activities of the Shin Bet, it is difficult to make an overall objective assessment. In any case, it is clear who is paying the price. This is an experiment on Palestinian human beings who, unfortunately, are not recognised by most of the Israeli media and public as human beings, and therefore the experiment on them can continue without interruption.

Attorney Eitay Mack represents Mahmada and other Palestinian victims of Israeli far-right terrorism together with the Israeli human rights organisation Tag-Meir Forum.

This article first appeared on the Hebrew media platform The Seventh Eye

Israel Judicial Reforms: The Arguments for and Against, and What’s at Stake

Despite months of protests, the Israeli parliament has passed a crucial element of the government’s controversial judicial reform. Critics say it will change the balance of power and further divide Israeli society.

If up to a quarter of a million people take to the streets for months and months, there must be a lot at stake. Especially if it’s a country of just 9.3 million people.

Since January, Israel has seen the biggest protests in its history – the judicial reform initiated by the government could change the country significantly. Despite massive opposition, the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, has now passed another core element of the reform.

What is the reform about?

Israel’s most right-wing and religious coalition government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wants to reset several aspects of the separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judiciary. As Israel doesn’t have a constitution, the interaction of these institutions is regulated by individual laws.

Traditionally, Israel’s Supreme Court has had a relatively strong position as there is no second chamber in parliament that can keep Knesset legislation in check.

The main focus right now is on the so-called adequacy clause: until now, the Supreme Court has been able to declare government decisions as “inappropriate” and, therefore, make them null and void. Netanyahu’s government wanted to put an end to this clause.

After a first vote in mid-July, the decisive vote was on Monday. Out of a total of 120 Knesset members, all 64 government MPs voted yes, which means the law has now been passed.

The next step of the judicial reform is due to be voted on in the Knesset as early as autumn: if passed, it would give the government more powers over judicial appointments. Over recent months, however, Netanyahu has indicated that he might be willing to partially concede in this area.

How do those in favour argue?

Unlike the 120 members of the Knesset, judges are not directly elected by the people. That is why the government and its supporters argue that their proposed judicial reform would strengthen Israeli democracy. From their point of view, the judiciary has too much power and the proposed reform would in fact improve the balance between institutions.

Recently, supporters of the reform have also taken to the streets for counter-protests. According to media reports, around 50,000 participants were counted in Tel Aviv on Sunday evening, including many residents from other parts of the country and settlers from the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is seen as very conservative and nationalist. Photo: Av Jolanda Flubacher/World Economic Forum/swiss-image.ch. CC BY-SA 2.0.

The judicial reform is being pushed primarily by nationalist and religious parties in the governing coalition. The far-right minister for national security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, recently declared that his party ‘Jewish Strength’ would reject “any softening” of the draft law as “castration”. He called on the coalition to pass the law in its current form and to move forward with the next parts of the reform.

What is the criticism?

For critics of the reform, however, the government is planning nothing less than the “destruction of democracy” – a slogan on many posters and banners.

Protesters have also drawn comparisons with Poland and Hungary, whose respective governments are also accused of trying to restructure the judiciary. The two countries are often considered problematic in the European Union with regard to rule of law and separation of powers, and both are facing several infringement procedures.

Critics argue that judicial reform in Israel could cause a deeper division of society: in the past, the Supreme Court has repeatedly defended values such as gender equality and the protection of sexual minorities against strict religious restrictions. Many Israelis who consider themselves as secular, left-wing or liberal fear the restructuring would strengthen the ultra-Orthodox wing.

The issue has even reached the army, where mandatory service for men and women is seen as promoting a melting pot and acting as a social glue. Ultra-Orthodox Jews are exempt from this service, which the Supreme Court has repeatedly declared discriminatory.

Over the weekend, more than 1,000 Israeli Air Force reservists threatened to quit their voluntary service if the judicial reform were passed. “We all have a collective responsibility for overcoming deep divisions, polarization and rifts among the people,” they said in a joint statement.

The statement was also boosted by support from members of numerous other units, including reservists from the domestic and foreign intelligence services Shin Bet and Mossad.

What’s next?

Authorities are preparing for more angry protests: according to the police, officers were preparing in case they had to prevent protesters from entering the Knesset.

Civil society groups such as the “Movement for Quality Government” said right after the vote that they would take the revised adequacy clause to the Supreme Court. Judges will then have to check whether their own partial disempowerment would be constitutional.

If they were to block the reform, Israel would probably find itself on the brink of a national crisis. To avert this, the government would likely have to withdraw the reform – a scenario that many observers expect would lead to the collapse of the coalition.

This article was originally published on DW.

Amid Protests, Israeli Parliament Approves Contentious Judicial Reform Law

Thousands of protesters gathered near parliament in the hours leading up to the vote, with some of them having camped there as a show of opposition to the proposal.

Israeli lawmakers on Monday approved a key portion of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s divisive plan to reshape the country’s judicial system.

The plans have split the nation since they were unveiled in January, sparking one of the biggest protest movements in Israel’s history.

Failed attempt at compromise

All 64 lawmakers from the ruling right-wing coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu voted in favour of the text, with opposition members of parliament boycotting the vote.

The vote – which is the second of three needed for the overhaul – came after a heated session in which opposition lawmakers chanted “shame” and stormed out of the chamber.

Lawmakers debated the divisive legislation through the night into Monday, with Israel’s President Isaac Herzog seeking a compromise and meeting Netanyahu at the hospital.

Despite Herzog’s efforts to mediate, Israel’s opposition leader Yair Lapid said efforts to reach an agreement had failed. “With this government, it is impossible to reach agreements that will preserve Israeli democracy,” Lapid was reported as saying ahead of the vote.

Israel’s far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir condemned the last-minute attempts at compromise.

The minister said he regretted that “parts of the coalition are negotiating and seeking a compromise that undermines the law”.

The Bill limits the Supreme Court’s ability to strike down government decisions that the judges deem “unreasonable”.

Protesters block roads 

Thousands of protesters gathered near parliament in the hours leading up to the vote, with some of them having camped there as a show of opposition to the proposal.

Some banged on drums and blew horns as they blocked a route leading to the Knesset, while police used water cannons to push the demonstrators back. Police said 19 people had been arrested in the protests as lawmakers began the voting process.

Proponents of the changes – a core part of a wider judicial restructuring – say they are needed to curb the powers of the Supreme Court.

Critics say the legal revamp, driven by a governing coalition that includes religious extremist and ultranationalist parties, will undermine Israel’s democratic values.

They say the plan will erode Israel’s system of checks and balances, and could open the door for authoritarian rule.

Only hours earlier, the Israeli prime minister was released from the hospital on Monday after an emergency cardiac procedure, hours ahead of the parliamentary session.

The Sheba Medical Center near Tel Aviv admitted Netanyahu late on Saturday after doctors said a monitor had detected an irregular heart rhythm. Medics said the following day that an operation to fit a pacemaker had gone smoothly.

This article first appeared on DW. Read the original piece here

Can Israel Survive the Disaster Netanyahu Has Steered the Country Towards?

The ongoing state terror of the Occupation lies at the heart of the Israeli malaise that undercuts the claim that Israel is a functioning democracy.

Israel – that is, the state of Israel within the so-called Green Line (the pre-1967 boundaries) –  is, or has been until now, a democracy, but a rather weak one. It is far weaker in this respect than India, the United States, Canada, and many Western European countries. It has no constitution, no real distinction between the legislative and executive branches of government, a unicameral legislature (the Knesset), and effectively no checks upon the power of the government except the courts, in particular the Supreme Court that also sits as the High Court of Justice. The current prime minister, Bibi (Benjamin) Netanyahu, and his ministers and supporters are now trying to eliminate that hindrance.

The mechanism they have chosen is a blitzkrieg of anti-democratic legislation in the Knesset, where they have a majority (64 out of 120 seats). Leading this strategy, ironically, is the Minister of Justice, Yariv Levin, a fanatical, ideological opponent of the High Court. The first, and crucial, major bill they are on the point of passing changes the composition of the committee that makes appointments to the Supreme Court as well as to lower courts. If the new law comes into effect, the government will have total control of such judicial appointments (as opposed to the present situation, in which there is a delicate balance in the committee between politicians and judges, along with representatives of the Israel Bar Association).

But Levin has already announced a further, detailed program of legislation, which the government euphemistically defines as “legal reform.” It includes a law allowing the Knesset to overrule judgments by the High Court with a simple majority of one vote; a law stripping the legal advisers to government ministries of their binding authority (possibly the most radical and dangerous of the new proposed laws); and other bills enshrining the legal supremacy of the Jews over all other human beings in Israel-Palestine (notably the Palestinian Arab citizens of the state, and of course the nearly three million Palestinians in the Occupied Territories who already lack any and all human rights). There are also bills in progress that would allow the government to incarcerate its critics at will, to suppress freedom of expression and freedom of the press, to enforce elements of Jewish religious law in the country as a whole, and so on. One should bear in mind that, unlike in India and the US, there is no separation of religion and state in Israel; all personal status laws, for example, are within the sole jurisdiction of the religious authorities serving the various communities.

Three forces

Three conceptual matrices, or political forces, are driving this campaign to undermine the democratic foundations of the state, such as they are. The first, and the most desperate, likely has to do with Netanyahu’s personal legal predicament. Since 2019 he has been facing charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust that were submitted to the courts by his own appointee, Avichai Mandelblit, the then State Attorney. The case may drag on in court for years; but the proposed changes in the committee of judicial appointments would allow Netanyahu to stack the High Court with stooges of his choosing (with an eye to the moment when he would appeal a conviction).

Secondly, the hardcore political and social base of the Israeli right – the so-called Bibists – is composed of voters, many of them from families who immigrated to Israel in the 1950s from Arab countries, who have a ferocious, though irrational, hatred for the High Court of Justice. They believe, mistakenly, that the court is a bastion of the old Ashkenazi or European elite, whom they resent, and they fail to see that the High Court is there to protect them and their rights. For the Bibists, like for many people throughout the world, democracy means only majority rule, even if it leads to the tyranny of the majority. Netanyahu has himself incited his base against the courts as part of a populist, authoritarian ideology; the explicit goal is to achieve and maintain Jewish supremacy in all of Israel-Palestine. Bibists detest the very idea of universal human rights and equality for all.

Thirdly, insofar as the anti-democratic forces have an intelligible, though patently immoral, political goal, it is the annexation to Israel of all Palestinian territory west of the Jordan River – that is, the occupied West Bank, which has been colonised for decades by Israeli settlers living on Palestinian land (mostly with the active collusion of the Israeli courts). For the more extreme right-wing nationalists, such as finance minister Bezalel Smotrich who has publicly proclaimed his programme, annexation comes with a plan to expel the entire Palestinian population from their lands and homes. Despite the fact that the record of the High Court when it comes to Palestinian matters is far from honourable, the hyper-nationalists see the Court – with some justice – as a major obstacle to achieving their goals. Over the years, there have indeed been moments when the Court ruled against the government and the Israeli settlers, occasionally even forcing them to evacuate small bits of stolen Palestinian land. There is no doubt that a mass expulsion of millions, whatever the circumstances, would be ruled illegal by the High Court in its present, relatively balanced composition. Hence the need to politicise the court, thereby destroying its independence and subordinating it to the government’s decrees.

Benjamin Netanyahu with Israel President Isaac Herzog. Photo: Kobi Gideon, Israel Government Press Office/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Additional factors

Other factors of consequence come into play at this critical juncture. Of all the destructive acts Netanyahu has perpetrated, the most shameful is his rehabilitation and legitimisation of the overtly racist, and often violent, ultra-nationalists, such as the present Minister of National Security (a newly invented post), Itamar Ben Gvir. These ideological heirs to the Kach movement of the rabid Jewish supremacist Meir Kahana, from the lunatic fringes of the Israeli system, have in the past been repeatedly barred by law and cabinet decisions from running for parliament. Now they are lynch-pins in Netanyahu’s extremist coalition. Their strength is growing and, as usual in such cases, Netanyahu’s delusional belief that he can control them has already been shown to be false. For that matter, does he really want to control them? Without them, his coalition will collapse.

Another crucial component of the coalition comes from the ultra-Orthodox or Haredi communities, who constitute at this point 13.5% of the population and whose birth rate must be among the highest in the world. Historically, the Haredi politicians and rabbis were once moderate, even anti-nationalist; but over the last decades their constituency has been “nationalised” and now mostly aligns with the right. Like several of his predecessors, Netanyahu has, to put it simply, bought their allegiance; Haredi men are usually exempt from serving in the army and, generously subsidised by the state, contribute little to the Israeli economy. Given this lopsided situation in which a certain segment of the population carries the whole burden of serving, and if necessary fighting and dying for the state, not to mention paying taxes, while another large segment takes no part in such irksome matters, it is not surprising that the Haredi politicians hate and fear the Supreme Court, which might (in theory) take away their privileges. They obey a higher, God-given law that always trumps the civil courts of the nation-state. That said, the Haredi communities are not homogeneous; one can hope that someday some among them will revert to their original peace-oriented stance. Meanwhile, even voices from within the Likud, the ruling party, have publicly acknowledged that the anti-democratic legislation is meant to appease Haredi voters.

Netanyahu has brought this country to the brink of civil war. There is a deepening economic crisis, the direct result of the anti-democratic blitz. Moody’s has downgraded Israel’s credit status. The high-tech industry, the backbone of the country’s GNP, has in recent weeks transferred billions of dollars in assets to places outside the country. The army, especially the reserve units, is coming unstuck; hundreds of reserve officers, including combat pilots and the intelligence units, have announced that they will refuse to serve under a dictatorship. The secret and not-so-secret services have warned that the crisis is turning into an existential threat to the state. Heads of municipal councils all over the country are threatening to go on hunger strike. America, Israel’s primary support in the world, has backed away from Netanyahu in disgust. Sector after sector has joined the huge, Gandhian-style protests against the new legislation and the political agenda behind it. Last week, close to half a million protesters came out into the streets all over Israel. Something here has shifted; there is an awakening; robust resistance may yet block the government’s designs. It has already forced the prime minister to put a temporary hold on the legislation until the spring session of the Knesset, which began on April 30.

Crisis long in the making

There are deeper roots to the crisis. In a highly non-trivial sense, the state with all its organs and institutions has been taken over by the religious nationalists – once a marginal political force that in recent decades, after the 1967 war, has grown exponentially to the point where they determine government policies. They include, or at least actively support, the half-million or so Israeli settlers in the Occupied Territories. Much of Jewish history over the last two millennia or so has been marked by a pendulum swing between a normative, humane, and moderate Talmudic orthodoxy and recurrent outbursts, sometimes on a grand scale, of messianic, eschatological movements that claim, literally and blindly, that God’s redemption is near. The last devastating cataclysm of this sort took place in the seventeenth century in the Jewish communities of Eastern Europe with the emergence of the false Messiah, Sabbatai Zevi. We are living through another, potentially fatal such outburst in our time. Israel is split more or less down the middle – not simply and superficially between right and left blocks but between the apocalyptic, fundamentalist hyper-nationalists and the older model of Zionist pragmatists. Note, however, that the latter have been quite prepared to accept and sustain the ongoing state terror of the Occupation, the heart of the Israeli malaise that in itself undercuts the claim that Israel is a functioning democracy.

One last remark. It is wrong to think of Netanyahu himself as motivated by purely egoistic concerns, including the lust for unbounded power and the wish to take revenge on a legal system that has had the temerity to bring him to court. True, he seems oblivious to the catastrophic consequences of his actions. (What would you do if you were prime minister and your Minister of Defence, a hard-core right-winger, told you and the public that the new legislation has to be aborted before the security of the country is badly compromised? Netanyahu, true to form, fired the minister but had to reinstate him a few days later because of nationwide protests.) But it is also clear that the prime minister is a committed ideologue on the right – the far right – who has consistently, from the beginning of his political career, set as his ultimate goal the irreversible shattering of the Palestinian national movement in all its shapes and forms, with its historic aims. He has had some success in this endeavour; Palestine is in disarray. There is only one minor problem with the project. In the long run it cannot, and will not, work.

David Shulman is an Indologist and an authority on the languages of India. A professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, he is an activist in Ta’ayush, Arab-Jewish Partnership. His latest book is More Than Real: A History of the Imagination in South India, published in April 2015.

Chart: Trust in Institutions Has Diminished in Israel

As seen in an annual survey by The Israel Democracy Institute, Israelis’ trust in the state’s institutions has been deteriorating for some years, with only 35% of people in the country saying they trusted institutions quite a lot or very much in 2022, down from a high of 61% in 2012.

Mass protests against a controversial judicial reform have intensified in Israel after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the firing of defence minister Yoav Gallant on Sunday. Gallant spoke out in opposition of Netanyahu’s reform that would give control over the appointment of judges to the government and also enable the parliament to override the Supreme Court. Gallant cited the refusal of some reservist forces to train in the light of the plans as a reason to put a pause on the reform to not endanger the security of the country.

After the ouster, several more cabinet ministers as well as the president of Israel (a largely ceremonial role) also spoke out against the reforms that experts say would undermine the independence of the judiciary. After protesters had lit several fires on Tel Aviv highways Sunday night and were dispersed around 2 am the following day by water cannons, universities in the country are on strike this Monday, while Israel’s largest labour union has announced a press conference.

As seen in an annual survey by The Israel Democracy Institute, Israelis’ trust in the state’s institutions has been deteriorating for some years, with only 35% of people in the country saying they trusted institutions quite a lot or very much in 2022, down from a high of 61% in 2012. The Supreme Court still enjoyed a comparably high trust score: 42% of Jewish Israelis said they trusted it last year – rank 3 behind the Israeli Defense Forces and the President of Israel. This score was substantially higher than trust in the government (24%) and the Knesset, the Israeli parliament (19%). For Arab Israelis in the survey representative of the country’s population, the Supreme Court was the most trusted institution out of all, while trust was lower across the board for this group.

You will find more infographics at Statista, where this article was originally published.

Thousands of Israelis Protest Against Netanyahu Despite Lockdown

The street protests, just three days after parliament approved an edict to limit the scope of such demonstrations, kept pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over his handling of the coronavirus crisis.

Tel Aviv: Thousands of Israelis protested across the country on Saturday, flouting a new law meant to curb anti-government demonstrations during a coronavirus lockdown.

The street protests, just three days after parliament approved an edict to limit the scope of such demonstrations, kept pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over his handling of the coronavirus crisis and over allegations of corruption, which he denies.

The new law bans Israelis from holding demonstrations more than 1 km from their homes and forces stricter social distancing, a measure the government said was aimed at curbing COVID-19 infections. Critics have called it a blow to freedom of speech.

Most protests on Saturday night were small and scattered throughout the country, though a crowd of thousands gathered in Tel Aviv. A small number of protesters scuffled with police and tried to block city streets. About fifteen people were arrested, a police spokesman said.

Israel has shut down much of its economy and instructed people to stay within a kilometre of their homes whenever possible in an effort to contain a second-wave surge in coronavirus infections.

Israelis Protest Bill To Stifle Protests During Coronavirus Lockdown

The measure, which critics said was really intended to block anti-Netanyahu protests, was approved by a parliamentary committee on Tuesday.

Jerusalem: Hundreds of Israelis demonstrated outside parliament on Tuesday against a government-backed bill likely to stifle protests near Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s home during the current coronavirus lockdown.

The proposed law, which the government said was aimed at curbing COVID-19 infections, bans Israelis from holding street demonstrations more than one kilometre (0.6 miles) from their homes.

The measure, which critics said was really intended to block anti-Netanyahu protests, was approved by a parliamentary committee on Tuesday. It was expected to be ratified by the full Knesset (legislature) later in the day.

Many of the thousands of protesters who have gathered weekly outside Netanyahu’s official residence in Jerusalem to demand his resignation over his handling of the health crisis, and alleged corruption, have travelled there from other cities.

Outside the Knesset on Tuesday, demonstrators waved Israeli flags, banged on drums and chanted in favour of free speech ahead of the vote.

“They are denying us the right to protest because of political reasons, not for health reasons and it’s mind-blowing, the frustration is beyond words, is beyond words. And a great worry,” said one of the demonstrators, Efrat Ben Barak, 40.

Policemen detain a protester during a demonstration against the Israeli government as parliament resumes discussions to finalise legislation restricting demonstrations during the nation-wide coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown, outside the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, in Jerusalem September 29, 2020. Photo: Reuters/Ronen Zvulun

Police said three protesters who tried to block city workers from taking down banners that were hung illegally were arrested.

Also read: In Israel, a Demand That Indian Police Coming for Training Be Screened for Kashmir Abuses

Israel went back into lockdown for at least three weeks on September 18, 2020, after new COVID-19 cases climbed to around 7,000 a day in a population of nine million, overtaxing some hospitals.

Bickering within Netanyahu’s coalition government prevented street protests from being included in activities restricted by the one-kilometre limit, such as family visits, before the Yom Kippur Jewish fasting day on Monday.

Tuesday’s vote was necessary to add the demonstrations to that category and limit all protest gatherings to 20 people.

Netanyahu says Israel has handled the health crisis relatively well and that he has no political motive in seeking to prevent street protests. He denies any wrongdoing in three corruption cases against him.

Israel has reported 234,060 infections and 1,516 deaths from COVID-19, the respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus.

Israel Is Militarising and Monetising the COVID-19 Pandemic

Coronavirus is ravaging the globe right now. It’s a perfect time for the Israeli state to figure out how to expand its already vast surveillance powers.

Israel held its most recent election in early March, just as the coronavirus outbreak first reached the country in late February. The results of the election at first appeared to give Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right coalition a major victory.

But within days, the media realised that the fulcrum of power had shifted from Netanyahu’s far-right bloc to the centre-right bloc led by Benny Gantz of Blue and White. As Israel’s president tasked the latter with forming a new government, based on the 61 MKs (Knesset members) who recommended he be offered the opportunity, it appeared there would be a minority government in which Blue and White would be supported from outside by the Palestinian Joint List.

Layered on top of this political crisis was a growing pandemic sweeping the world. As the number of Israeli victims and the first death from coronavirus was announced, Netanyahu saw an opportunity to revive his political relevance. Actually, Netanyahu acted even before the first death, which was on March 20.

Only a few days earlier, on March 16, he asked the Knesset intelligence committee to approve the use of a hitherto secret national database compiled by the Shin Bet and comprising private personal data on every Israeli citizen, both Jewish and Palestinian. In the aftermath of 9/11, Israel’s Knesset secretly assigned its domestic intelligence agency the task of creating the database, which was ostensibly meant as a counterterrorism measure.

The data included puts Edward Snowden’s alarms about the NSA’s mass surveillance to shame. It not only contains the names, addresses, and phone numbers of every citizen; it also records every phone call made, and the recipient of these calls, including name and phone number. It uses geo-location to track where every citizen has traveled within the country, and it maintains records of all online activity, including internet searches.

Also read: Gaza Runs Out of Coronavirus Tests, Palestinian Health Officials Say

The top-secret project was couched by Netanyahu as a powerful tool to monitor victims of the epidemic and all who had social contact with them. Few Israelis, aside from privacy advocates and related NGOs, raised any alarms about the obvious violations of individual privacy and rights entailed in both the database itself, whose codename was “the Tool,” and its use to compel suspected coronavirus victims to self-quarantine. They remained silent — even though health ministry officials urging them to approve use of the database suggested that the epidemic would force the state to “suspend personal freedoms.”

Mixing politics and pandemic

Few politicians, even in the opposition, questioned the prime minister’s exposure of a decades-long secret database touted as one of the Shin Bet’s most powerful counterterrorism tools. They should have, because Netanyahu was clearly exploiting the existence of the Tool to highlight for the public his indispensability. He wanted Israelis to view him as the strong, steady leader who could carry them through the threat posed by the epidemic.

He was pulling out all the stops to save his career, as the opposition plotted to form a government that would exclude him from power and leave him vulnerable to a criminal trial on three corruption counts. The planned governing coalition also proposed several new laws that would prohibit Israel’s longest serving premier from ever returning to power.

So Netanyahu pulled out all the stops. He directed the Likud speaker of the Knesset to use the excuse of coronavirus contagion to adjourn the Knesset. For that reason, the intelligence committee never approved use of the Tool during the epidemic. Instead, Netanyahu bypassed legislative oversight and employed emergency executive regulations to approve the plan.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures as he delivers a statement during his visit at the Health Ministry national hotline, in Kiryat Malachi, March 1, 2020. Photo: Reuters/Amir Cohen/File Photo

The opposition Blue and White appealed to the Supreme Court, which asked the speaker to reconvene the Knesset. When he refused, the justices told him he must do so within five days or Netanyahu’s order would be null and void. In response, the speaker himself resigned, which left the country with no legislative body, since only the speaker can call it into session.

Add the growing anxiety over the COVID-19 epidemic, which began to hit Israel in earnest, to the near panic over the country’s political crisis, and you have a perfect recipe for Netanyahu’s miraculous political comeback. Polling began to concern Gantz, showing that the public wanted stability and saw this in a unity government between his Blue and White and the Likud.

As a result, late last month, the opposition leader pulled the plug on the centre-right bloc he’d led through three previous elections and threw in his lot with Netanyahu’s Likud.  The bloc split in two, with fifteen MKs following Gantz into the new government and the remaining eighteen MKs, led by former IDF general Moshe Ya’alon and Yair Lapid, going into opposition. The split shocked Gantz’s former allies and was received as a betrayal of a campaign commitment he’d made never to sit in a government with an indicted prime minister.

As part of the deal to form the new unity government, Gantz demanded the speaker’s position for himself. This allows him to control the body’s agenda. Negotiations continue to be underway regarding the ministerial portfolios and legislative priorities.

Netanyahu exposed major intelligence asset for political self-preservation

Returning to the Tool, spy agencies are loath to divulge their secrets, and no doubt the Shin Bet was stunned when it discovered this potent weapon had been exposed. It was also concerned about the long-term criticism it might face on civil liberties grounds and, according to a security source, decided to leak an account of the Tool to foreign media.

That’s how Israeli intelligence reporter Ronen Bergman published his story in the New York Times in mid-March. Bergman followed up with a much more detailed account in Yedioth Ahronoth near the month’s end. While his story raised some ethical concerns, including noting that no time limit had been placed on retention of the data collected, it generally played down concerns that the project might violate individual rights.

Bergman did so by quoting former agency officials who claimed they had engaged in exhaustive deliberations about these issues, minimising any possibility of serious security breaches, or of the Tool being used for the purpose of a political vendetta or to harm innocent citizen victims.

But clearly, the aim of the leak was to portray the Tool and the agency in the most flattering possible light and head off any groundswell of criticism of it or its mission. It’s no accident that four days after the publication of Bergman’s article, the Knesset intelligence committee approved using the Tool in the COVID-19 fight.

Missing were any serious discussions about how it would impact those targeted by its use. The geo-location function would track every known coronavirus victim, and not only while they had the illness. It would go back in time two weeks to track every movement of the victim: where they went, who they met. It would even identify anyone who stood within six feet of the individual for longer than twenty minutes. Those bystanders, too, would be identified and placed under quarantine, whether they had the virus or not; whether they were tested or not.

Also read: Coronavirus: Gaza Faces Worst-Case Scenario

Any health policy expert will tell you that the history of pandemics, including HIV and Ebola, indicates that victims must not be criminalised or ostracised. They must be encouraged to cooperate with authorities in order to protect themselves, their family, and the public.

Given that Israeli police are now empowered to arrest anyone violating regulations and fine them $1,500, along with a six-month prison term, using the Tool as a law enforcement rather than a public health measure carries the nation very far in a direction no society should go.

The Israeli government also tasked the Mossad with purchasing hundreds of thousands of ventilators and respirators for its citizens to prepare for the full onslaught of the contagion. Media reports deliberately omitted the source of the equipment, saying only that it might be a country with which Israel has no formal relations. Other reports indicated that it was purchased in the United Arab Emirates.

In fact, Mossad officials interviewed for the TV programme Uvda boasted to Ilana Dayan, the host, that the agency had “stolen” the 100,000 face masks and respirators on the first shipment it brought to Israel.

The New York Times just published a bit of journalistic hagiography by Ronen Bergman, celebrating the heroics of the Mossad in saving Israeli lives by beating the bushes around the world for medical equipment and test kits to protect Israelis from COVID-19. But no one seems to have asked why the nation’s intelligence agency would be assigned the job of preparing for a national epidemic. Indeed, Bergman quotes an Israeli health official bursting with pride:

“It is only in Israel that the Sheba hospital could have enlisted the help of the Mossad,” he said in an interview. “Can you imagine Mount Sinai Hospital going to the C.I.A. for help?”

No one notes that in every other democratic country, the health authorities do such a job. But Israel, in a bit of political chicanery, appointed an ultra-Orthodox (“Haredi” in Hebrew) Jew who does not believe in science or medicine to take charge of the health ministry. The minister violated his own ministry’s quarantine orders and joined in prayer services, where he promptly contracted COVID-19. Were Israel a normal state instead of a mash-up of a theocracy and a garrison state, it would not need (or want) the Mossad to perform such duties.

Militarising the pandemic

Netanyahu has also directed hundreds of IDF soldiers to patrol inside Israel and enforce restrictions against movement. Armed soldiers have never walked the streets targeting Israeli Jews for violating the law. A Haaretz report claims it is the only democracy using its security services and military to track coronavirus victims.

In addition, the prime minister announced that the ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) city of Bnei Brak has been placed under full closure. In another first, the Border Police, whose mission is to enforce occupation on West Bank Palestinians and prevent them from entering Israel as illegal workers, will enforce the blockade on an entire Israeli Jewish community.

This reinforces the impression that Israel’s far-right government has militarised the contagion. Just as a hammer never met a nail it didn’t want to pound, it is only natural for a national security state like Israel to see COVID-19 as a security threat just as much or more than a health threat.

Special Patrol Unit police forces in Jerusalem, March 22, 2020. Photo: Ohad Zwigenberg/Reuters

Israel announced before any other country that its chemical and biological weapons lab at Nes Tziona had developed a vaccine (though the claim was later disputed). While it’s certainly commendable for Israeli scientists to make such efforts to save lives, Nes Tziona has the expertise to develop such a vaccine because its research involves testing and developing lethal agents used against the country’s enemies. The lab also develops agents to counteract such pathogens as COVID-19 in order to protect Israel’s soldiers and civilians.

But the preponderance of Nes Tziona’s work, at least what is known publicly, is used to develop deadly agents to kill Israel’s enemies. The poison injected by two Mossad assassins into Khaled Mashal in Jordan in 1997 was developed by Nes Tziona, as was the antidote that King Hussein demanded in order to save Mashal’s life. The poison used by the twenty-seven-strong Mossad hit team to assassinate Hamas weapons dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai in 2010 was similarly developed by Nes Tziona.

Any evaluation of the good that could come from such a COVID-19 vaccine must be weighed against the damage such a facility does in all its other work.

Democracy dies during disasters

Netanyahu is attempting to cast himself as the Indispensable Man during the health crisis. He knows that when an entire nation is living in uncertainty and mass anxiety, they are willing to sacrifice even more of their rights in return for a leader with a firm hand. This is how Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933 in the midst of a deep economic crisis. Similarly, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán arrogated to himself absolute power using the excuse of the epidemic to name himself dictator.

Fortunately, Netanyahu’s political status is unstable. He does not have the sort of ironclad control Orbán enjoys. There are limits to what he can accomplish. But over the past twenty-five years, during most of which he led the country, he has gradually consolidated massive power in himself and his office. There is a huge temptation to exploit that power as he faces legal and political challenges.

Israel’s right-wing defense minister, Naftali Bennett, offered his own proposals for fighting the pandemic. The technology he’s promoting would develop a scorecard for every citizen and rate their likelihood of having or transmitting coronavirus. Because the surge in the number of victims and hospitalizations has rendered it impossible to do proper investigation of the chain of transmission, in order to detect who was in proximity to the victim and isolate them as well, he urges adoption of a cyber tool created by the ID, which would pour all relevant data compiled by the ministry of health and Shin Bet into a database.

The computer model would then assign a score of one to ten to each individual profiled. The score would indicate in real time, moment by moment, the likelihood that they were infected. Those on the highest end of the spectrum would be “invited” for testing.

In a deft bit of dog-whistle racism, Bennett also noted that COVID-19 was spreading like wildfire through two different Israeli communities: the ultra-Orthodox and the Palestinian. He told a TV interviewer that there were “three Israels”. Two were riddled with disease. The third, presumably, was his own modern, well-educated, affluent, and relatively disease-free Ashkenazi sector.

He advocated treating the other two Israels as if beset by plague: sealing them off and letting them fend for themselves. In fact, Israeli authorities have refused to provide any testing for Israeli Palestinian communities, which are already best by inferior medical care. That is one of the reasons Israeli Palestinians in Jaffa rioted recently, throwing stones at police and firefighters.

Israel media reported that Palestinians protested the arrest of a resident who defied “stay-at-home” regulations. If that is the case, the blame lies as much with the state for not educating its minority citizens about the peril they face in ignoring public health protocols. But it’s equally likely these protesters were objecting to the not-so-benign neglect they face from the Israeli public health system.

The ultra-Orthodox face other obstacles to following public health regulations. Since they reject secular Israeli society, they are naturally segregated from outsiders. Their communities tend to be insular. Since they have rejected secular education, they tend to be poorer and live in apartments in densely populated neighbourhoods. And the only authorities they trust are rabbis, who naturally have no scientific or medical expertise. Many of the rabbis told their flock earlier that they should carry on daily life as usual, including mass prayer services and other public religious rites — all of which led to further spread of the contagion.

Bennett’s statement about both communities revealed the innate racism, and even a form of antisemitism, at the heart of Israel — toward Palestinians and the ultra-Orthodox, respectively. It also highlights the failure of the state to integrate either group into larger society. Israeli politicians benefit from the segregation of the ultra-Orthodox, who tend to vote as a bloc. Their political parties then join governing coalitions as they have the current far-right Likud-led government.

Israeli officials have banned people going more than 100 metres from their homes, unless for essential journeys such as food shopping. Photo: Reuters/Ronen Zvulun

The Haredi ministers tend to dole out funding and benefits to their community from the public purse. That’s how one of their rabbinic authorities became health minister without any experience in either health, medicine, or secular knowledge. In fact, when an interviewer asked him how long before the worst of the epidemic would be over, he replied that the Messiah would come before Passover and relieve all the suffering. He also developed COVID-19 himself after twice defying his own ministry’s quarantine orders ordering the end of public prayer services.

The development of Haredi political muscle that then joins secular Israeli governing coalitions has made for a convenient arrangement for both sides as long as the state has existed. But the downside is that they have been offered little reason to join the broader Israeli society. The COVID-19 tragedy, in which one public health expert has estimated that 40 percent of B’nai Brak’s residents are infected, is the result of that misguided social policy.

Monetising the pandemic

The second half of the defense minister’s plan to combat COVID-19 urged the nation to adapt the Tool as a “civilian” product developed by Israel’s cybersecurity industry and marketed to foreign countries. In fact, he suggested one particular company that was already doing so: NSO Group. As I’ve written here before, it is the world’s most successful cyber-hacking firm, recently sold to a private venture capital firm in the UK for a $1 billion “unicorn” valuation.

NSO’s primary product is Pegasus, the most sophisticated malware on the market. It has been used by police agencies in scores of countries to spy on terrorist groups and drug dealers. At least, that’s what the PR firms representing NSO will tell you. But there is a dark underbelly that NSO refuses to acknowledge. It also sells Pegasus to some of the most repressive countries in the world, whose secret police use it to target political dissidents, rights activists, independent journalists, and public interest lawyers.

NSO’s products have been used as evidence in cases brought against human rights activists fighting for democracy in their own societies. Ahmed Mansoor in the UAE was sentenced to ten years in prison for his activism. His cell phone was hacked, and all his emails and text messages were used as evidence in court against him.

Even more troubling is the case of Jamal Khashoggi, who was murdered by Saudi intelligence agents. They, too, used Pegasus to monitor Khashoggi’s contacts and even his physical location. The malware enabled them to determine where he was, where he went, and where he intended to go, including to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, where the murderers laid in wait for him.

Groups like Amnesty International and Citizen Lab are fighting back against these violations of basic human rights. The former is suing in Israeli courts to force the defense ministry to revoke NSO’s export license to sell Pegasus abroad.

NSO may see the handwriting on the wall in terms of the pushback against its malware. It may contemplate so much controversy that either the state will cease to permit its sale or the world will prohibit it. That’s why NSO is getting ahead of the curve. It knows about the Tool and is already offering to sell countries a “civilian” (meaning less problematic) version. Presumably, health ministries and government population registries would compile databases covering all citizens. Then, algorithms developed by the Shin Bet and/or NSO would manipulate the data to detect patterns among the population.

If you know who is already infected with COVID-19, you can trace their movements, who they’ve been in proximity to, and then spread a wider net to stop the circulation of the virus in the wider population. But, of course, such a tool can be used for much more nefarious purposes.

If you’re a Saudi intelligence agent, you can target a specific state enemy — where they go, who they meet, who they email or text, what they say to each other. You can go backward in time as long as you wish to follow such trails. It offers endless dragnet opportunities to ensnare targeted individuals and anyone who has any contact, whether benign or suspicious. This saves such security agents the tedious process of hauling suspects in for interrogation and attempting to elicit from them, by persuasion or force, incriminating information.

Also read: COVID-19 Could Result in a Geopolitical Face-Off

Bennett is promoting this new NSO product as a way to monetise the COVID-19 epidemic. Israel is one of the top ten weapons exporters in the world. But now, it’s also become a powerhouse in the field of black-hat cyber-security: selling tools used by the world’s most repressive regimes to exert social control.

It seems like human nature that grifters and con artists will exploit tragedy in order to cheat unwitting individuals. Even major corporations advertise during such disasters in order to promote their brands. But in this case, Bennett is using the power of his state office to promote not just an individual product, but the entire mass surveillance state it represents.

When a country buys Pegasus or the civilian version of the Tool, they are not just buying a discrete product. They are, in fact, buying all of the social, political, and intelligence premises built into it. Even if, for example, you have a national constitution or a set of regulations that govern surveillance and individual privacy, these tools are so powerful, so sweeping that they vacuum up massive amounts of data. The data cries out to be used and manipulated, which is what intelligence agencies like the NSA and the IDF’s Unit 8200 do.

In the process, they far outstrip any protections that may be in place to prevent misuse of personal data or violations of privacy. In that sense, Israel is exporting its own national security state alongside these cyber-tools: a state that sacrifices individual rights on the altar of security. A state in which citizens defer to state authorities who act in their name. So, when another country implements Israeli cyber-ware, they too will absorb some of these assumptions and values embedded in their development.

In effect, these cyber-spying tools are outrunning the development of laws to regulate them. There is no international code under which cyber-surveillance technology may be regulated. It is a Wild West out there. These are conditions Israel finds ideal for pursuing both its geo-political and commercial interests, interests that thrive on confusion, division, and uncertainty — precisely the conditions we now face.

Richard Silverstein blogs at Tikun Olam, where he covers the the Israeli national security state. He has contributed to the essay collections, A Time to Speak Out: Independent Jewish Voices on Israel, Zionism and Jewish Identity and Israel and Palestine: Alternate Perspectives on Statehood.

This article was published on Jacobin. Read the original here.

Netanyahu Set to Survive Another Knife-Edge Israeli Election

It could be days, or even weeks, before a new Israeli government emerges, after the horse-trading that has become standard after decades of close-run elections.

Benjamin Netanyahu may well have survived to fight another day as Israel’s prime minister after a third knife-edge election in less than a year.

However, it could be days, or even weeks, before a new Israeli government emerges, after the horse-trading that has become standard after decades of close-run elections.

With more than 90% of the vote in the March 2 election counted, Netanyahu’s nationalist Likud party and its allies can probably muster 59 seats in the 120-member Knesset, two short of a majority.

The main opposition Blue and White party of ex-general Benny Gantz will have trouble cobbling together a Knesset majority of the centre and left, given Gantz has ruled out a coalition with the Arab List.

Gantz’s party slipped at the election from its showing in the previous encounters over the past year, in April and September. This will weaken his hold on his leadership and diminish his bargaining power in a coalition-building process.

Also read: Explainer: Israel Voted Three Times in a Year. What Happens Now?

The Arab List represents Israel’s Arab population. This accounts for 20% of the country’s people, or 17% of eligible voters.

The Arab List is set to improve its position in the Knesset from 13 to possibly 14 or 15 quotas. This is a significant advance.

The wild card in all of this is the position of the staunchly secularist Yisrael Beiteinu party of Russian émigré Avigdor Lieberman, whose list appears to have secured up to seven quotas.

This places Lieberman, a former Netanyahu ally turned antagonist, in a potentially powerful king-making position. Lieberman has declared he will not serve in a government populated by the more extreme Orthodox Jewish parties. These political alignments shun military service.

But if there is a lesson in Israel’s politics in this latest fractious stage it is that no constellation of political forces can be taken for granted. Election fatigue after three polls in 12 months may well drive various players towards some sort of accommodation.

Israeli support for the status quo in the person of Netanyahu, who is under indictment on criminal charges, has signalled exasperation with continuing political paralysis. Gantz and his centrist party did not made a compelling case for change.

Lieberman’s support for any coalition that might eventually emerge could be described as fluid, depending on the allocation of the spoils of victory and his own resolute opposition to partnership with parties on the extremities of the religious right.

All this raises the possibility of a national unity coalition that would involve Natanyahu in partnership with Gantz. The two might rotate the premiership. This sort of arrangement has been tried before with varying degrees of success.

It was significant that on election night, after it became clear Netanyahu was likely to survive and Gantz had slipped, the two leaders refrained from making negative references to each other.

On security issues, they are not far apart, in any case.

The point of all this is that Israel has entered a period during which the playing cards will be shuffled in an attempt to come up with the sort of hand that enables relatively stable government.

Complicating calculations about the next stage is the fact that Netanyahu is due in court on March 17 to face serious charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust.

His allies in the Knesset have said they will seek to pass a law that would preclude, or freeze, the prosecution of any sitting prime minister.

That manoeuvre is given little prospect of success.

What may evolve is that judges agree to delay hearings for a short period, pending attempts to form a government. In any case, court proceedings may well drag on for a year or more.

In the meantime, Netanyahu would continue in his role. Remarkably, criminal charges do not preclude such a continuation in office.

Also read: In Israel, Yet Another Election on Benjamin Netanyahu’s Future

On the other hand, the uncertainties a criminal trial engenders would be potentially destabilising politically.

In the end, the willingness of enough Israelis to look the other way when it comes to charges of criminality appears to have enabled Netanyahu to survive as prime minister.

This observation comes with the caveat that, in political terms, not much can be taken for granted in Israel.

Typical, perhaps, of attitudes towards the case against Israel’s leader were these remarks in The Guardian by a small businesswoman in Jerusalem:

I don’t mind if he eats takeaway food in boxes covered with diamonds. Look what is happening around us.

One of the charges against Netanyahu is that he improperly used public funds to feed himself and his family.

From an international perspective, the Israeli election result is likely to pose a significant dilemma. That is if Netanyahu presses on with his threats to annex settlement blocs in the West Bank and the Jordan Valley.

Most countries regard these settlements on land occupied after the 1967 Six-Day War as illegal under international law.

This is where a potential Netanyahu victory aligns itself with a possible Trump re-election.

No American president has been as accommodating to Israel’s nationalist impulses. No US administration has been as antagonistic to Palestinian aspirations.

Also Read: In 10 Points, What the ‘Israel Model’ Is and Why It’s Bad for India

Washington yielded to long-standing Israeli pressure to move its embassy to Jerusalem and at the same time reverse US policy that regarded settlements as a breach of international law.

If Netanyahu is confirmed as Israel’s prime minister for another term and Trump is re-elected, prospects for an accommodation between Israelis and Palestinians will likely become more distant.

Elections have consequences.

Tony Walker, Adjunct Professor, School of Communications, La Trobe University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.