‘They Keep Shattering Hopes’: Rohith Vemula’s Mother Vows to Continue Fight

On Friday, Radhika Vemula, Abeda and Salim Tadvi and Fathima Nafees said they would hold a nationwide rally against the CAA.

Hyderabad: Radhika amma threw her arms around the bust of Rohith Vemula, trying to remember how it felt to touch her son, whom she lost four years ago. She was visibly broken, yet trying to give the students of University of Hyderabad (UOH) all her strength and support to take the fight for social justice, one which began with the death of her son four years ago on January 17, forward.

Radhika Vemula, along with Abeda and Salim Tadvi, parents of Dr Payal Tadvi, were let into the UOH campus after a thorough security check for the ‘Rohit Shahadath Din’, an event conducted by the Ambedkar Students’ Association (ASA) on Friday.

Also Read: My Birth is My Fatal Accident: Rohith Vemula’s Searing Letter is an Indictment of Social Prejudices‬

Radhika amma first went to the Velivada, a structure that Rohith and with four other Dalit students stayed in while they were suspended from the hostel in December 2015 by the UOH administration. Velivada in Telugu translates to a Dalit ghetto. She garlanded the bust of her son, followed by Abeda and a few others. Amidst the crowd that had gathered, the two mothers broke down, remembering their children’s demise, which many have blamed on institutional caste discrimination within places of higher education.

After chanting few slogans, the students along with Radhika Vemula rallied towards the DST Auditorium, where other speakers like Yogendra Yadav, professor K. Laxminarayana and advocate Bheem Rao also joined.

Radhika Vemula leads the students in a march. Photo: Hamna Naseer

While others spoke about the spectre of caste that is still pervasive in the society, Radhika Vemula and Abeda provided instances of caste discrimination which led to the deaths, institutional murders as they call it, of their children. “They shattered our hopes. And they keep shattering the hopes of others, it hasn’t stopped. Institutional murders like Rohith’s continue in our country,” said Radhika Vemula.

At an earlier event, Radhika Vemula announced that together with Payal Tadvi’s mother Abida and JNU student Najeeb Ahmed’s mother Fatima Nafees would launch a ‘Mothers for the Nation Yatra’ as a nationwide campaign against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act tour.

Payal Tadvi was a student of the BYL Nair Hospital in Mumbai, when she took her own life in May last year. In a letter, she accused her senior of caste discrimination. Tadvi hails from the marginalised Bhim Muslim tribal community. Najeeb Ahmed, a JNU student, has been missing since October 2016.

Radhika Vemula described the CAA as an attempt by the Narendra Modi government to make the country a Hindu rashtra. “I have been struggling for the past four years. I still stitch clothes to survive. After watching all these student protests in JNU, my blood is boiling again. Let Modi and Shah prove where they come from first. In any case, we should not tolerate this,” she said, according to The News Minute.

advocate Bheem Rao, Dontha Prashant, Radhika Vemula, Abeda and Salim Tadvi. Photo: Twitter/@radhikavemula

Will continue the movement, say university students

Dontha Prashanth, a PhD scholar who was also suspended from the hostel along with Rohith Vemula, said the Justice for Rohith Vemula movement will not stop. “In these four years, casteist forces or those in power tried to subvert or dilute the movement through different forms of harassment. But the movement has proved that the spirit of resistance can’t be stopped,” he said.

Iniyavan, a PhD scholar who is also the president of ASA, said that Rohith Shahdath Din is that time of the year when students who believe in equality, self-respect and social justice join hands. “Especially, Dalit Bahujan students who have rejected victimhood and are committed to taking forward the caravan of Babasaheb. It is also that time of the year when Savarna anxiety is shaken by the bitter reality that Caste exists,” Iniyavan said.

Also Read: It’s Time to Defang ‘Meritocracy’, an Argument That Claims Lives

Ahmed is a first-year student of MA Philosophy at the university. He was not on campus when Rohith died in 2016, but was among many new students who were expressing their solidarity with the movement. “It was the Rohith movement that made me politically active. I couldn’t take in what had happened in UOH, couldn’t see the callous behaviour of vice-chancellor P. Appa Rao and the Ministry of Human Resources Department. As a student, watching Radhikamma’s tears hit me hard in the gut. But she then led the rally and showed us that we will not forsake the struggle,” he says.

While Rohith Vemula’s death sparked massive student movements across the country against the caste atrocities, especially in institutes of higher education, more instances of students taking their own lives have been reported. University campuses still continue to face caste or religion-based discrimination. Recently, Fathima Latheef, a young Muslim student from IIT Madras, took her own life and accused professors of religious discrimination.

In universities, students are also fighting against fee hikes, implementation of reservation and welfare measure for marginalised students. But as commentators have observed, Rohith Vemula has emerged as a symbol of resistance for student movements across the country.

Hamna Naseer is currently pursuing her Master’s in Communication at the University of Hyderabad.

Najeeb Ahmed Case: Delhi Court Directs CBI to Give Closure Reports to Mother

The court’s order came while hearing a protest petition filed by Najeeb Ahmed’s mother, Fatima Nafees, against the CBI’s closure report in the case.

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Monday directed the CBI to give copies of all statements and documents related to the closure report of the probe into missing JNU student Najeeb Ahmed’s case to his mother within two weeks.

Chief metropolitan magistrate Naveen Kumar Kashyap directed the probe agency to supply the documents in physical or electronic form and asked the investigating officer of the case to appear before it in person on May 7.

The court’s order came while hearing a protest petition filed by Ahmed’s mother, Fatima Nafees, against the Central Bureau of Investigation’s closure report in the case.

Her lawyer argued that she has not been supplied statements of witnesses.

Watch | A Vanishing Act: Where Is JNU Student Najeeb Ahmad?

It has been two years since JNU student Najeeb Ahmad went missing on October 15, 2016. Just this month, the Central Bureau of Investigation finally closed the case.

It has been two years since JNU student Najeeb Ahmad went missing on October 15, 2016. Just this month, the Central Bureau of Investigation finally closed the case. His disappearance has added to the sense of siege in the student movement across the country.

CBI Officially Winds Up Search for Missing JNU Student Najeeb Ahmad

Najeeb Ahmad had gone missing from Jawaharlal Nehru University JNU here on October 15, 2016, following a scuffle the previous night with some students allegedly affiliated with the ABVP.

New Delhi: The Central Bureau of Investigation has finally closed the case of missing JNU student Najeeb Ahmad as the agency’s efforts to trace him have yielded no results, officials said Monday.

The agency has submitted his report in Patiala House court recently after getting permission of the Delhi high court, they said.

The court is likely to hear the matter on November 29, they said.

While taking permission of the Delhi high court to close the case, the agency which began their probe in May last year had said all aspects were looked into but it could not find any trace of an offence.

Najeeb Ahmad had gone missing from the Mahi-Mandvi hostel of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) here on October 15, 2016, following a scuffle the previous night with some students allegedly affiliated to the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP).

Also read: Delhi HC Directs Media to Remove News, Videos Linking JNU Student Najeeb Ahmed to ISIS

The agency had announced a reward of Rs 10 lakh for anyone giving information about Najeeb and informed police chiefs of all state police in the country, they said. It also received some inputs from Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi where teams were immediately dispatched but to no avail, the officials said.

The agency had carried out a thorough check on unidentified bodies and pasted Najeeb’s photograph on toll stations seeking information about him but these efforts did not result in any positive results, they said. After exhaustive search, the agency has decided to close the case, they added.

Just this month, the Delhi high court on Wednesday asked some media houses to retract from their websites and YouTube certain news reports and videos which allegedly link him to the terrorist organisation ISIS.

Justice J.R. Midha issued the direction on a defamation suit moved by the student’s mother, Fatima Nafees, contending that the news reports and videos are defamatory and seeking an apology as well as Rs 2.2 crore in damages from the media houses.

The Wire had earlier reported on the Times of India article in question, which was carried on the front page of the daily on March 21, 2017. In the story, journalist Raj Shekhar Jha, on the basis of conversations with anonymous “highly placed sources” claimed, Ahmed’s internet browsing history apparently showed that he was looking for information on ISIS’s “ideology, execution and network,” and that his searches included “ways to join ISIS” and similar such queries.

The article, for which the daily drew considerable criticism from civil society and students alike, had further claimed that the conclusions were drawn from a report on Ahmed’s browsing history, which was accessed by the Delhi police.

Soon after the TOI story was published, many television channels picked up the news – including Times Now, which according to the lawsuit ran tickers titled “Najeeb searched for information on ISIS” – without confirming the charges with the Delhi police, whose officials had subsequently denied having accessed any such report on Ahmed’s browsing history.

(With inputs from PTI)

Delhi HC Allows CBI to File Closure Report in Missing JNU Student Najeeb Case

The bench declined the plea of the missing student’s mother, Fatima Nafees, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) and monitor the probe

New Delhi: The Delhi high court, on Monday, allowed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to file a closure report in the case of JNU student Najeeb Ahmed, who went missing from the university nearly two years ago.

A bench of justices S. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel “declined” the plea of the missing student’s mother, Fatima Nafees, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) and monitor the probe, thereby removing the CBI from the investigation.

The bench said Nafees, who had moved the high court in November 2016 seeking directions to the police to trace her son, “can raise all contentions available to her before the trial court” and disposed of the plea.

The court had reserved its verdict in the case on September 4.

The CBI, which had taken over the probe on May 16 last year, had after more than a year of investigation said it had looked into all the aspects of the case and was of the opinion that no offence was committed against the missing student.

Ahmed had gone missing from the Mahi-Mandvi hostel of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) here on October 15, 2016, following a scuffle with some students allegedly affiliated to the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) the previous night.

The lawyer for Nafees had contended before the court that it was a “political case” and that the “CBI has succumbed to the pressure of its masters”.

Nafees had moved the high court on November 25, 2016, seeking directions to the police to trace her son.

However, as the Delhi Police remained clueless about Ahmed’s whereabouts even after seven months since he went missing, the probe was handed over to the CBI on May 16 last year.

The Delhi Police had not opposed the handing over of the investigation in the case, saying it had done its bit in the matter.

The counsel for Nafees had earlier said nine students were named in a complaint filed by 18 students, who were eyewitnesses to the alleged assault on Ahmed, yet they were not interrogated.

The nine students named in the complaint have denied all the allegations against them.

Najeeb Ahmed’s family at a protest demanding an expedited investigation. Credit: PTI/Files

Najeeb Ahmed’s family at a protest demanding an expedited investigation. Credit: PTI/Files

Chronology of events

Following is the chronology of events in JNU student Najeeb Ahmed’s disappearance case:

October 14, 2016: Najeeb goes missing after altercation with some ABVP students.

October 18: JNU seeks CBI, NCRB’s help to trace missing student.

October 20: Home minister Rajnath Singh asks police to set up special team to trace JNU student.

October 24: Delhi police declares Rs 1 lakh reward for information on Najeeb.

November 25: Najeeb’s mother moves Delhi HC for tracing son. HC issues notice to Delhi government and police asking them to explain their stand.

November 28: Delhi Police raises reward for information on Najeeb to Rs 10 lakh.

November 28: HC asks city police to “cut across all political barriers” and to find Najeeb as no one can just vanish from the heart of the national capital.

December 9: HC slams cops for failure to trace Najeeb as police clueless about him even after 55 days.

December 14 : HC orders police to scan the entire JNU campus, including hostels, classrooms and rooftops, of the varsity by using sniffer dogs.

December 19: More than 600 cops, sniffer dogs search JNU campus to get clues on Najeeb.

December 22 : HC asks Delhi police to do everything possible to find Najeeb and suggest to the police to conduct lie-detector test on his roommate and the nine suspects in the case.

January 28, 2017: Najeeb’s family alleges harassment by Delhi Police by conducting pre-dawn searches at their house at Badaun.

February 13: HC “foxed” by lack of information on Najeeb’s whereabouts; family seeks to handover probe to some other agency.

March 30: Magisterial court rejects nine suspect students’ plea against polygraph test and summons them to appear on April 6.

May 3: Sessions court sets aside the magisterial court order. However, allows police to send them a fresh notice.

May 15: Police files charge sheet in case related to making ransom call to relatives of Najeeb demanding Rs 20 lakh for his release.

May 16: HC transfers missing JNU student case to CBI with immediate effect and the probe to be supervised by an officer, not less than the rank of a DIG.

November 14: CBI tells HC it has sent suspect students mobile phones to its forensic lab and was awaiting the report of analysis.

April 2, 2018: HC pulls up CBI’s forensic lab in Chandigarh for laxity in examining the suspect students’ mobile phones.

May 11: Nearly a year after being handed over the probe, CBI tells HC that no evidence found to show any crime was committed.

July 12: CBI tells HC it was seriously contemplating filing a closure report in the missing case.

September 4: HC reserves judgement in the case after CBI says it has investigated the case from all possible angles and has not got any clue on Najeeb. The agency said it wants to file a closure report.

October 8: Nearly two years after he went missing from JNU, the Delhi high court allows CBI to file closure report in the investigation. HC disposes of Ahmed’s mother’s plea seeking directions to police to trace her son. HC also declines her plea to set up a SIT and monitor investigation. It says she can raise all contentions before trial court.