‘Pregnancy No Ground for Bail’: Delhi Police Cites Jail Statistics, Opposes Safoora Zargar’s Plea

At the Delhi HC, police said 39 deliveries have taken place in Delhi prisons in the last 10 years.

New Delhi: The Delhi Police on Monday opposed in the Delhi high court the bail plea of Jamia Milia Islamia student Safoora Zargar. Police cited the fact that 39 deliveries have taken place in Delhi prisons in the last 10 years as proof that Zargar’s pregnancy did not demand that she be given bail.

Zargar had been arrested on April 10, under the stringent anti-terror law, UAPA. The Delhi Police’s Special Cell is investigating her role in the riots in northeast Delhi. The 27-year-old had been active in the protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act.

The Delhi Police, in its status report filed through Special Cell DCP P.S. Khushwaha, opposing Zargar’s bail plea, said a “clear and cogent case” has been made out against the accused woman and as such she is not entitled for bail for the “grave and serious offences which have been meticulously and surreptitiously planned and executed by her.”

Zargar is 23 weeks pregnant.

Her June 4 bail plea was turned down by Judge Dharmendra Rana who instead of a direct order, said, “When you choose to play with embers, you cannot blame the wind to have carried the spark a bit too far and spread the fire. The acts and inflammatory speeches of the co-conspirators are admissible u/s 10 of the Indian Evidence even against the applicant/accused.”

Also read: Safoora Zargar Denied Bail as Judge Finds Prima Facie Evidence of ‘Conspiracy’

During the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General Aman Lekhi urged Justice Rajiv Shakdher to grant them a day’s more time for seeking instructions on the issue, saying it will be in larger interest if they are given indulgence.

The court, which conducted the hearing through video conferencing, allowed the request after Zargar’s counsel said she has no objection to it and listed the matter for Tuesday.

Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for Zargar, said the woman is in a delicate state and is in a fairly advanced stage of pregnancy and if the police need time to respond to the plea, she be granted interim bail for the time being.

In the status report filed through advocates Amit Mahajan and Rajat Nair, the police said Zargar is also being provided with complete care to prevent any COVID-19 infection and she has been lodged in a separate cell and chances of her contracting coronavirus from any other person does not arise.

“There is no exception carved out for pregnant inmate, who is accused of such heinous crime, to be released on bail merely because of pregnancy. To the contrary, the law provides for adequate safeguards and medical attention during their custody in jail,” it said, adding that 39 deliveries have taken place in Delhi prisons in the last 10 years.

The report also indicates that her pregnancy should have acted as a “check” on Zargar. “…the very fact of rearing of life ought to have been a check on activities (by Zargar) which had a potential to cause, and which did in fact cause large-scale destruction of life and properties,” News18 has quoted the report as having said.

“…the health status of the accused (both mental and physical) is satisfactory and normal. Further all medical care and prescribed medication is being provided to her to ensure the well being of the accused and her foetus, as such on this ground also no case for bail has been made out by her,” the police said and prayed for dismissing the bail plea.

The hearing also witnessed exchange of words between Mehta, Lekhi on one side and Delhi government standing counsel Rahul Mehra who objected to the appearance of the two senior law officers on behalf of Delhi Police in the case.

Delhi Police sticks to ‘conspiracy’ angle

In its report, the Delhi Police has said statements of “witnesses and co-accused clearly implicate Zargar as being a leading co-conspirator in commissioning of serious offence of causing large-scale disruption and riots, not only in the national capital but also in other parts of the country.”

Also read: Delhi Police Riot ‘Plot’ Has Trump Present When He Can’t Have Been, Kapil Mishra Absent

“The present case pertains to grave offence against the society and nation. The investigation is at a very crucial juncture, and therefore, considering the sensitivity and the broad nefarious conspectus of present case, it would not be in the interest of justice as well as in public interest to grant bail to the accused at the present stage,” it said.

The report said the motive and the idea behind this conspiracy was to go to any extent possible, “be it a small scuffle with the police during blockage or instigation of riots between two communities or to advocate and execute a secessionist movement in the country by propagating an armed rebellion against the lawfully constituted government of the day.”

It added, “funds were used and supplied to organise the protest sites and fake vouchers were manufactured/forged. Acid bombs, iron roads, swords, nailed sticks, knives, sling shots, stones were used in the Delhi riots which were pre-planned in a systematic and organiser manner.”

It was decided that the “anti-government feeling of Muslims” will be used at an appropriate time to destablise the government, the police claimed, adding that the protests were carried out during the visit of US President Donald Trump to India “to attract international media attention to propagate a narrative that the Government of the day was anti-Muslim,” the report said.

“This sinister and nefarious conspiracy was designed in various levels according to which the facade of a civil disobedience or protest was to be maintained to buckle the government to agree to the illegitimate demands of the accused, it said.

(With PTI inputs)

Jamia in Top 10 Universities in HRD’s NIRF Ranking but Loses Battle of ‘Perception’

“JNU’s perception score does not drop despite the anti-national tag,” said Mohammad Sayeed, a researcher and former student of Jamia. “This shows how important certain identity is.”

New Delhi: Despite having a higher overall ranking amongst universities vis-a-vis parameters like graduate outcomes, teaching, learning and resources, outreach and inclusivity, Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) has scored lower when it comes to the parameter of “perception” in comparison with Delhi University (DU).

According to the latest National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) 2020 released by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) on Thursday, Jamia figures in the top ten varsities of the country in the overall ranking of universities, with DU at the eleventh position.

As per an official statement by Jamia, this is the first time that the varsity has secured a position amongst the top ten universities of the country. “JMI has been ranked at the 10th position in the country in universities category, improving its position from 12 last year,” the statement said, further adding that “In ‘overall category’, the university has been placed at 16th position, enhancing it’s ranking from 19th last year. IITs, IIMs, IISc, other top technical institutions and universities are included in the overall category. A total of around 6 thousand institutions took part in NIRF this year.”

“The achievement is all the more significant because of the challenging time the university has faced recently and also in the light of increased competition in the ranking,” said Jamia Vice-Chancellor professor Najma Akhtar. According to the statement, the VC also “attributed the achievement to the improved perception about the university with regard to teaching, placements, research etc.” with the hope of doing better in the coming years.

While it is true that Jamia has scored higher than DU as far as the overall ranking of universities, graduate outcomes, outreach and inclusivity and teaching, learning and resources are concerned, it still falls behind in perception, said Mohammad Sayeed, a researcher, who has analysed the NIRF 2020 report of three central universities of Delhi, namely JNU, Jamia and DU.

Approved by the MHRD and launched in September 2015, the ranking report is broadly based on parameters such as “Teaching, Learning and Resources,” “Research and Professional Practices,” “Graduation Outcomes,” “Outreach and Inclusivity,” and “Perception”.

Also read: ‘I Hide My College ID Card’: Jamia Students Fight Social Stigma

According to Sayeed’s comparative analysis, Jamia scored 71. 35 out of 100 in teaching, learning and resources category this year, while DU scored 50.18 and JNU 74. 98. Similarly, in the graduate outcomes category, Jamia scored 88.52, JNU 100 and DU 88.21. Furthermore, in terms of outreach and inclusivity Jamia (73.05) is way above DU (60.37) and a little below JNU (75.10).

However, it falls far behind when it comes to ‘perception’, with a score of just 31.60 out of 100, while DU scored 53.44 and JNU 67.24 points. Notably, “the ranking methodology gives a significant importance to the perception of the institution” as per the MHRD.

“The Jamia perception number can be compared not only with its own column but every other number in the table to show how exceptionally low it is. How can a university suddenly drop in one specific criterion?,” Sayeed told The Wire. Sayeed, a former student of Jamia, who completed his PhD on Jamia Nagar from the Delhi School of Economics (DSE), DU, further said that “JNU’s perception score does not drop despite the anti-national tag” and added that “this shows how important certain identity is.”

Both Jawaharlal Nehru University and Jamia Millia Islamia have been at the centre of a storm for protests by students against the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the National Register of Citizens (NRC), hostel fee hike, etc. Both the universities have been constantly targeted, termed as dens of ‘anti-national’ activities and there have also been demands by right wing organisations to shut down both the universities.

On December 15 last year, the students of Jamia were violently attacked by the Delhi Police. According to a fact-finding report, the police attacked students with the intent of inflicting maximum damage. Later, a right-wing supporter fired at Jamia student protesters while they were marching towards Mahatma Gandhi’s memorial on January 30.

A number of Jamia’s students and alumni are currently lodged in jail for allegedly instigating violence in north-east Delhi in February this year and being a part of a ‘conspiracy‘.

Similarly, the students and teachers of JNU were brutally attacked in January, allegedly by members of right-wing organisations. In addition, two students from the varsity (JNU) have been arrested under charges similar to those that students from Jamia have been booked under.

On ‘Request’, Twitter Removes Poster Calling for Protest Against Anti-CAA Activists’ Arrests

A woman who shared the poster on the social media site has received an email from Twitter which revealed that the content had to be removed.

New Delhi: Following a “legal removal demand” from Indian authorities, Twitter has deleted a poster featuring some of the female student activists arrested by Delhi Police, including Safoora Zargar, Natasha Narwal and Devangana Kalita

The poster – circulated by several organisations – had made a nationwide call for people to gather “against [the] repression of anti-CAA protesters” at college and university campuses on June 3, while “maintaining norms of social distancing”. 

The poster was shared by many Twitter users with the hashtag #SabYaadRakhaJayega. The call was to protest against the successive arrests of student activists and slapping them with charges under the draconian Unlawful (Activities) Prevention Act.

A Twitter user, confirming the removal of the poster to The Wire, said she got an email on June 11 from Twitter’s legal wing informing her about them receiving the demand from the Indian authorities to remove certain ‘content’, claiming that it “violates law(s) in India”.

“Indian law obligates Twitter to withhold access to this content in India; however, the content remains available elsewhere,” the mail said.

The Twitter user, Sabina Yasmin Rahman of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (Nagaland campus), said she had uploaded the poster on June 1 and tagged “couple of people including student leader Umar Khalid”. Khalid has been named in the chargesheet filed by Delhi Police in the Delhi riots case. 

Also read: Now, Delhi Police Slap UAPA Charges on Pinjra Tod’s Devangana Kalita Too

“The tweet got a lot of likes and retweets,” she added. 

Sabina said she shared it, “Also because like me, Devangana comes from Assam, and she has been amplifying Assam’s stand on NRC (National Register of Citizens) and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) here. She was one of the founder members of the feminist movement Pinjra Tod but people of Assam are yet to learn about their feminist activist and that she has been arrested under UAPA for being a part of the anti-CAA protests in Delhi.”

On getting the email, which carried no mention of what particular ‘content’ the authorities wanted removed, Rahman said, “I initially thought it was because I have been tweeting about Assam’s peasant leader Akhil Gogoi”. Gogoi has been incarcerated, also under the UAPA, since last December for leading anti-CAA protests in Assam.

Following the recent controversy around illegal mining of the Dehing Patkai rainforest in Assam and the ongoing fire at Baghjan in the state’s Tinsukia district due to the blowout of a gas pipeline being drilled by a Gujarat-based company, Sabina has been tweeting about Gogoi.

Also read: Fire at Assam Oil Well After Gas Leak Threatens Life, Livelihood and Biodiversity

“Akhil Gogoi’s absence is being felt in the state now as we see the Dehing Patkai case and the Baghjan blowout. These are issues Akhil has been raising and fighting for since 2006. Somehow, our own civil society has failed to see that he has always been ahead of his times. And the larger section of Assamese need to at least now show more solidarity with his politics as it has become the only politics that can save the region,” Sabina said.

Rahman found that she could not access her Twitter account in the immediate aftermath of receiving the email. She could do so after the tweet with the poster was removed from her timeline. 

Watch | Why is Indian Society Silent Over the Jailing of Safoora Zargar?

The Wire’s senior editor Arfa Khanam Sherwani and Delhi University professor Apoorvanand break down the latest development in the Jamia student’s case.

A Delhi court on Thursday rejected the bail plea of ​​Jamia coordination committee media coordinator Safoora Zargar. The 27-year-old, who is pregnant, was arrested by the Special Cell on April 13 and is facing a UAPA case in connection with the Northeast Delhi riots. She is lodged in Tihar Jail.

The Wire’s senior editor Arfa Khanam Sherwani and Delhi University professor Apoorvanand break down the latest development in the Jamia research scholar’s case.

Safoora Zargar Denied Bail as Judge Finds Prima Facie Evidence of ‘Conspiracy’

Zargar’s lawyers also appealed for bail on humanitarian grounds, given that she is 21 weeks pregnant and reportedly suffering from Poly Cystic Ovarian Disorder.

New Delhi: Delhi’s Patiala house court on Thursday denied bail to 27-year-old Safoora Zargar. The research scholar from Jamia Millia Islamia is currently in judicial custody in connection with her alleged role in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, which is being investigated by the Delhi Police’s Special Cell.

While dismissing the bail petition, Judge Dharmendra Rana said:

“When you choose to play with embers, you cannot blame the wind to have carried the spark a bit too far and spread the fire. The acts and inflammatory speeches of the co-conspirators are admissible u/s 10 of the Indian Evidence even against the applicant/accused.”

While making a case for bail, her counsels Ritesh Dhar Dubey and Trideep Pais told the court that the investigating agency was creating a false narrative to implicate innocent students who do not approve of the government’s policies. They also submitted that the prosecution’s charge that Zargar delivered an inflammatory speech on February 23, 2020, at Chand Bagh was inaccurate. Her lawyers claimed that she had visited Chand Bagh for a short while on that day but that was before the violence had started. They also told the court that she had delivered a speech in Khureji on February 23, but it wasn’t inflammatory or provocative in any manner.

Also Read: Delhi Communal Violence: Jail for Pregnant Safoora, Bail for ‘Gun Supplier’ Sirohi

While making its arguments against granting of bail, the prosecution submitted a seizure memo relating to FIR 101/2020 registered by the Khajoori Khas Police Station. The seizures in FIR 101/2020 of Police Station Khajuri Khas include materials like stones, bricks, crates of glass bottles, and 3 sling shots that were reportedly found in front of suspended Aam Aadmi Party leader Tahir Hussain’s house.

The reference to evidence collected in another case, pertaining to another FIR, during Zargar’s bail hearing came as a surprise, given that the student was not arrested in FIR 101/2020 but 59/2020.

‘Prima facie evidence to show there was conspiracy’

The judge, while pronouncing his order, also referred to statements made by eye witnesses and a WhatsApp chat that had been placed on record. The judge held that there is prima facie evidence to show that there was a conspiracy to at least block the roads (chakka jam).

“As per the provisions of sections 339 of the Indian Penal Code, causing wrongful restrain to even a single individual is a penal offence. Section 141 clause 3 provides that any assembly of five or more persons is designated as ‘unlawful’, if its common object is to commit any offence.”

Also Read: ‘We Have Pinned Our Hopes on the Judiciary’: Jailed Student Safoora Zargar’s Husband

The judge also refused to entertain the defence counsel’s argument that Safoora was liable only for her individual acts and speeches and the acts of other members of the group could not be read against her. The judge held,

In my considered opinion, if there is prima facie evidence of existence of a conspiracy, the evidence of acts and statements made by one of the conspirators in furtherance of the common object is admissible against all…Therefore mere absence at the spot or absence of any overt act would not help the cause of the applicant/accused.”

Zargar’s lawyers also appealed for bail on humanitarian grounds, given that she is 21 weeks pregnant and reportedly suffering from Poly Cystic Ovarian Disorder. They told the court that her condition had become all the more vulnerable because of the COVID-19 crisis and pointed out that inmates in all three of Delhi’s jails had contracted the coronavirus infection. While dismissing her bail plea, the judge asked the concerned jail superintendent to provide adequate medical aid and assistance to the accused.

Speaking to The Wire, Zargar’s counsel Ritesh said, “Ms Zargar’s family was hopeful that court would give due consideration to health risks to Ms Zargar in Tihar due to COVID-19. Ms Zargar will consider legal remedies available to her in due course of time.”

Safoora Zargar was arrested by the Special Cell on April 10, in connection with FIR 48/2020 filed in the Jaffrabad road-block case. She was granted bail in the case on April 13 but on the same day, her name was added to FIR 59/2020 and she was arrested again.

Seemi Pasha is an independent multimedia journalist based in Delhi. She can be reached at seemi_pasha on twitter.

As Shaheen Bagh Fights, Where Are the Women of Aligarh?

AMU’s female students face three layers of resistance: the administration, women who are radical anti-feminists and those who claim to be the custodians of Aligarh ‘tehzeeb’.

I write this in despondency, with the horrific night of December 15 in my memory.

I write this when times are hard, when my people are being shot dead for being Muslims, when the dark shadow of the National Population Register looms over our heads, when women all over the world are influenced by the she-roes of Shaheen Bagh and Jamia and I remain aloof.

Why did women of Aligarh not fight with equal mettle? Two thousand undergraduate female students found themselves on road on the morning of December 16 when the so-called guardians let go of all responsibility after an undeclared sine die closure.

After reading the chapter in Secluded Scholars dedicated to Women’s College of AMU, ‘School for Wives’ I am reminded of a statement from the film Parched: ‘Women who read make bad wives’. During the time of Sheikh Abdullah, the pioneer of Muslim women education and the founder of the Women’s College of Aligarh Muslim University, the same narrative was prevalent.

Minault writes:

“Rather than emphasising a clean break with traditional family ties – Sir Sayyid’s idea for Aligarh boys – the girls’ school should emphasise a continuation of family traditions and observances, obedience and authority.”

The campaign for female education was carried out by the proponents of Aligarh Movement on the pretext that women with adequate and censored education, in proper ‘purdah’, would make better wives than uneducated women matched with educated Muslim men of Aligarh Muslim University. Thus, with much ado, Sheikh Abdullah convinced families to send their ‘sharif’ daughters to the residential school where he created an atmosphere that was a mirror image of the suppressive domestic household environment prevalent then.

Also read: What Aligarh Muslim University Can Learn From Its Women Students

That was the beginning of Abdullah Hall, a beautiful well enclosed place, with peacocks dancing in greenery and flowers blooming in spring. A place that paid no heed to Article 19 of the Indian constitution just as Amit Shah decided to pay no need to Article 14 of the constitution, a place as hopeless as the Indian judiciary.

In the small city of Aligarh, the historic facade of ‘Bab-e-Syed’ and the monumental legacy of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan unintentionally overshadows a smaller world of unheard issues in the girls’ residential hostel and Women’s College of Aligarh Muslim University, Abdullah Hall. The campus of this college is rather peaceful since it is designed to remain unaffected by the outside world – a kind of confinement not heard of in the modern world.

Aligarh Muslim University students protest at the gate of the university campus. Credit: PTI

Aligarh Muslim University. File photo. Photo: PTI

In recent months, Abdullah Hall has witnessed deliberate restrictions on free movement, an unacceptable invasion of privacy, unduly character assassination, misuse of power by post holders, slander and curtailment of basic freedom. Over the years, the students merely acquiesced to the rule of one Sunday outing per week, and cancellation of the same if Valentine’s Day or a festival fell on that day.

Article 19 of the Indian constitution deems it a constitutional right to move freely in India. A life that restricts a girl from stepping out of the campus on an idle afternoon on a Wednesday is a life undreamt of. Any outing requires a long process which includes acquiring an application of consent from a parent and the permission of the warden, who is free to decline as per her will. Incidentally, other girls’ residential halls in Aligarh Muslim University – wherein the undergraduate students of engineering, medicine and law reside – do not observe such absurd rules.

On September 24, 2019, a new provost, Ghazala Naheed, was appointed to Abdullah Hall. Within a week of her appointment, she issued a diktat cancelling the provision of special outings (what is so special about stepping out on a Monday?) since there are already three normal outings in a week, imposing a curfew hour at 5.30 pm, forbidding one to one interactions with Zomato and Swiggy delivery executives after 6 pm, planting surveillance cameras everywhere and discouraging girls from participating in competitions and workshops held outside the girls’ campus.

Also read: At Shaheen Bagh, Muslim Women Take Their Place as Heroes of the Movement

The founder of the Women’s College, AMU, Sheikh Abdullah (1874-1965) is considered to be a father figure, fondly called ‘Papa Mian’ by residents of the Abdullah Hall. With the support of his wife, Waheed Jahan Begum, he established a girls’ school that later developed into a college, educating women of orthodox families that were reluctant to accept scientific education for even their sons. His collective contribution to the community is praiseworthy and he is still remembered with utmost love by the women whose lives were changed because of his efforts.

However, even after a hundred years, Abdullah Hall is still struggling with issues that should have long been done away with. The outside world can scarcely imagine what goes on inside the campus. With seven hostels accommodating undergraduate and high school girls, a small library, a gymnasium, a canteen, two small shops, a tailor, a shady beauty parlour, a playground and an auditorium, Abdullah Hall is a small village with utilities placed in the vicinity for students, hence rejecting their plea for free movement.

Abdullah Hall was known to be a purdah boarding, where the curriculum, comprising elementary mathematics, needlework, Urdu – which was the household language – and basic account-keeping to prepare them for marriages was different from that of men. Living inside Abdullah Hall in 2020, one wonders if the change in the subject curriculum has reformed the idea that education is required to nurture Muslim women into good wives that rear good children.

In her paper Reform and Identity: Purdah in Muslim Women’s Education in Aligarh in the Early Twentieth Century, Shadab Bano wrote:

“Clearly, the observance of purdah remained crucial to the entire project of women’s education at Aligarh. Abdullah hall was laid out with high enclosing wall all around and the hostel/school building placed within was separate enclosures again with high obscuring walls, some sort of double protection from outside gaze was provided. Special arrangements for purdah were made even though it was enclosed from all sides. Particular care for purdah was taken in all its details so that it appears perfectly safe from all sorts of criticism. Whatever be the requirements of purdah at that stage, it had a deep impact in the founding of the institution and fixing its nature and rendering it more respectable.

The purdah had been so strong that even letters for the girls would be first scanned by Wahid Jahan and then passed on to girls. When Abdullah addressed the students there was a screen put up between him and the students. Students who were not blood relatives could not go out to meet him. So while confinement of women in the smaller settings of house hold spaces was regarded as excessive and there for eg hair sharii; confinement of girls in the larger enclosure of the boarding school with only conditional guarded movement was regarded as perfectly legitimate”.

Also read: We Are Seeing, for the First Time, a Sustained Countrywide Movement Led by Women

The campus has witnessed rebellion several times in recent past, girls have broken locks to protest only to face severe ramifications and character assassination as a result. In 2013, a manual made it compulsory for women to be dressed in decent ‘salwar kameez’ with a ‘dupatta’ and imposed a fine of Rs 500 if the regulations weren’t followed.

In 2012, female students were barred from entering the university’s Maulana Azad Library, one of the biggest libraries in Asia. The issue made several headlines and for four long years, the central library was closed for the women students.

Such cases are countless: four girls in a two-seated room were caught smoking cigarettes in the month of September, 2019. Smoking inside the premises of residential halls is an unstated offence that does not apply to men who are employed in the hall, the gate-keepers and the workers. The canteen behind the Maulana Azad Library offers a spectacle where boys can be seen smoking cigarettes along with their professors.

Women protest at Shaheen Bagh. Photo: PTI

Thus, smoking, indeed hazardous, is an offence inside the campus for girls because it is directly associated with the character of the girl caught smoking. Does an offence of this magnitude give the head girl and the wardens the liberty to snatch a girl’s phone and scroll through her personal pictures? Five wardens with the then provost, interrogated the girls for four hours, used abusive language for them, “yeh tawaif hain (these girls are harlots)”, and instead of punishing them, used it as an excuse to call a girl’s parent and say, “Apki beti ke nudes hain, dekhenge aap? Bhejoon aapko? Puchiye kya karti hai (Should I send your daughter’s nudes to you? Ask her about her activities)”. The girl’s father suffered a heart stroke. Her phone was unlocked and kept in the warden’s custody for three days.

Such an instance, observed closely by many, was a sheer violation of Article 21 of the Indian constitution: “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to a procedure established by law.”

Also read: The Brave Women of Shaheen Bagh

With augmented oppression and curtailed rights, women have institutionalised the suppression of freedom of speech. Ironically and unfortunately, the revolt of students faces three layers of resistance – the administration, women who are radical anti-feminists and a section of male students in the university, sherwani posh who claim to be the protectors of Aligarh tehzeeb (tradition).

Newman once wrote:

“A university training is the great ordinary means to a great but ordinary end; it aims at raising the intellectual tone of society…It is the education which gives a man a clear conscious view of his own opinions and judgments, a truth in developing them, an eloquence in expressing them and a force in urging them.”

The idea of a university is challenged every day by the administration, the soul of this institution is asleep, and it needs to be reawakened. While Delhi burnt, Shaheen Bagh rebelled and ‘Jamia ki ladkiyan’ fought at the forefront against the state. ‘Aligarh ki shehzadiyan’ sat with a suspended internet connection and no outing.

Hayaat Fatemah is an undergraduate student at Aligarh Muslim University.

‘I Hide My College ID Card’: Jamia Students Fight Social Stigma

After several students were beaten up over their affiliation to the college when they went to cover the Delhi riots, students are being more and more careful about when and where to disclose their identity.

For students of Jamia Millia Islamia university, being looked up on with suspicion has become a factor they have to contend with daily. The fear factor doubled when slogans like “Jamia ko saaf karo (clear up Jamia)” and “Shaheen Bagh ko saaf karo (clear up Shaheen Bagh)” were raised during the Delhi riots in February.

As a result, students at Jamia have become scared about disclosing their identity. The social stigma has been ongoing since the December 15 incident when Delhi police stormed inside the campus, students say.

“Whenever I tell people that I am from Jamia, they look at me as if I am from Pakistan,” says Versha Koul, who is pursuing a masters in journalism.

Parents have also apprehensive about the safety of their wards. Koul, who is from Jammu, says that her parents keep calling her every two hours. She feels her independence is being curbed because of uncertainties in the capital.

Students now also hesitate to show their college ID cards, say Arjun Ramachandran and Mobin, students of M.A. Mass Communication.

“Whenever I go somewhere far from my PG accommodation, my parents advise me not to carry my Jamia ID card,” says Yumna Mobin, a mass communication student who is from Kolkata. After the December 15 incident, she prefers to show her Aadhaar card over the Jamia ID card to prove her identity.

Ramachandran says he has become careful about revealing his affiliation to Jamia. “I am just pragmatic enough to not say that I am from Jamia,” he says, talking of how one student was allegedly beaten by the police on February 24 at Jaffrabad. The police, he said, had asked the student for his ID and when he showed his university ID card, he was “knocked down to the ground in the very next moment”.


Also read: ‘Trauma for Life’: Jamia’s Night of Horrors Continues to Haunt Students


Prabhat Tiwari, a student of development communication and a photojournalist, spoke of how he refused to show his Jamia ID card. “If I would have told them that I am from Jamia, they [rioters] would have thrashed me,” says Tiwari, who was in Maujpur in North East Delhi to document the violence on February 24. Since that day, he keeps his college identity hidden and reveals only his name and the name of his hometown, Ayodhya.

This much information, he says, fills the criteria of being a ‘good citizen’.

The stigma associated with Jamia students is not limited only to riot-hit areas. Many students feel anxious while traveling by metro or cabs. Maria Uzma Ansari, a history honours student, has begun to take a longer route to get to college every day. Cab and auto drivers, she says, show reluctance when she says she wants to go to Jamia.

Ek auto wale ne mujhse bola ki main Jamia nahi jaunga, wahaan to insaan hi nahi rehte (an auto driver told me that he would not go to Jamia as humans don’t live there),” says Ansari, who now chooses to take cab till New Friends Colony and then takes a rickshaw to get to her college

Koul is terrified amidst the uncertainty, and has been ever since Shadab Farooq, a student at Jamia, was shot by a man brandishing a gun at anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protestors on January 30.

Jamia has also become a household name due to extensive media coverage, but a large part of it is negative. Misinformation about the university, spread by various news channels, has indirectly impacted students.

For example, Republic TV’s coverage on December 30, soon after the shooting incident, identified the shooter as ‘Jamia protestor’. Although they rectified it later by calling it a ‘mistake’, the damage has been done.

While students are outspoken about their affiliation with Jamia at protest sites, many of them are reluctant to reveal the information when it comes to most other interactions. So even as Jamia tries to limp back to some kind of normalcy, the fear of being attacked has only increased.

Salman Saleem is a post-graduate student at AJK MCRC, Jamia Millia Islamia

Featured image credit: Salman Saleem

Jamia Police Brutality: Alumni Association Files Complaint Against Delhi Police

The complaint alleges that police used all manner of communally charged slurs at the students.

New Delhi: The Jamia Alumni Association has filed a complaint against the Delhi Police for trespassing, criminal intimidation, brutality, causing grievous hurt and assault on the university’s students on December 15.

The complaint comes days after purported footage from CCTV cameras were made public. Police and paramilitary personnel can be seen thrashing students in one of the videos. In another, they can be seen raining batons on students trying to escape.

While police have held that the sequence of events is being established, this is the first official complaint lodged by a body against its personnel since the December violence in and around Jamia.

The complaint, copies of which were tweeted by journalist Saahil Murli Menghani, make claims that have long since been made by students who were in and around campus on the day.


The complaint alleges that police used state machinery and power with no provocation or warning. Tear gas shells and stun grenades were fired at students protesting peacefully outside the varsity gates, it alleges.

Among other allegations made in the complaint are that police thrashed ex-servicemen deployed as guards at the gates to gain entry into the university, and that they broke the glasses in the library, causing a range of injuries to students.

Mention of the allegation that is being made widely on social media – that police broke the CCTV cameras before indulging in even more grievous violence – has been made in the complaint too.

The Alumni Association also says that police could be heard saying the following phrases while carrying out the violence: ‘Jai Shri Ram’, ‘Maaro saalo mullo ko’, ‘Nikal be Pakistani’, ‘Kalma padhlo sab’ and ‘In saalo ko azaadi dete hai’. All are understood to be communal in nature.

Also read: Jamia Violence: Delhi Police Names Sharjeel Imam as ‘Instigator’, Sent to Judicial Custody

Special Commissioner of Police (Crime Branch) Praveer Ranjan told PTI that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the December 15 violence will analyse all the video clips to establish the exact sequence of the events leading to that day’s incident.

“Once the sequence of events is established, we will identify all those involved in the violence and action as per law will be taken. By just seeing the videos being released on social media, it will not be appropriate to declare at this point of time that those present inside the Jamia campus or its library were innocent,” the special commissioner was quoted as having said..

The Jamia Coordination Committee issued a statement saying that it was not in possession of the latest video or any other such footage as the administration denied it access citing that they will be sharing relevant footage with the people concerned when approached through official channels.

“The students who are being seen in these videos have clearly gone through a lot in the past two months. The humiliation, pain and horror is still fresh in their minds. Many students in the videos are seen shaking inconsolably and panicking in a terrorised state and have taking psychiatric help,” it added.

Jamia Violence: Delhi Police Names Sharjeel Imam as ‘Instigator’, Sent to Judicial Custody

Imam, who is already under arrest in a separate case, was remanded to judicial custody until March 3.

New Delhi: After the Delhi police named JNU student Sharjeel Imam as the “instigator” of the violence reported at the New Friends Colony near Jamia Milia Islamia in December 2019, a court on Tuesday sent him to judicial custody till March 3. Imam has already been under arrest in a separate case, in which charges of sedition case have been invoked against him.

The Delhi police has filed a chargesheet before chief metropolitan magistrate Gurmohina Kaur, naming Imam as an instigator of the violence, news agency PTI reported. The police have also attached CCTV footage, call detail records and statements of over 100 witnesses as evidence in the chargesheet.

No student from Jamia Milia has been named in the chargesheet, which was filed on February 13. Police have also said that empty bullet cartridges belonging to a 3.2 mm pistol were found in the areas where the violence was reported, police say in the chargesheet.

According to reports, 17 people have been arrested for the violence, none of whom are students of Jamia Milia Islamia. Of those arrested, nine are from New Friends Colony and eight are from the Jamia area.

The court had on Monday sent Imam to one-day custody of Delhi Police in the case.

On December 15, 2019, violence was reported at the site of an anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) protest by students of Jamia. The students had claimed that ‘outsiders’ were responsible for the violence, a claim that has gained credence by the fact that the chargesheet does not name any Jamia students.

After the violence, the Delhi police stormed the university without permission and were accused of a brutal crackdown on students. A fact-finding report found that police attacked students with intent of causing maximum damage. CCTV footage released recently has also contradicted the police’s official version that they had not entered the university’s library. The video shows police attacking unarmed students.

Sharjeel Imam was arrested on January 28 from Bihar after cases of sedition were filed against him in five different states for a speech he made during a protest against the CAA. In the speech in question, Imam said no political formation has stood by the Muslims of India and that the Constitution could not emancipate Muslims. He said roads leading to the northeast should be blocked off by Muslims, forcing the government to listen to anti-CAA protesters.