‘Sale’ of Puri Dharmasala Land Snowballs Into Political Controversy

Opposition parties and activists say the Puri administration is only the caretaker of the land and cannot sell the Bagala Dharmasala’s property.

Bhubaneswar: The controversy over the alleged sale of a part of Puri’s historic Bagala Dharmasala, a hospice built in 1905 by a Jagannath devotee who later handed it over to the then district collector to provide cheap accommodation to the visiting pilgrims, is snowballing with BJP and Congress decrying the move.

The leaders of these parties have demanded immediate cancellation of the sale deeds made in favour of six lodge owners of the temple town. Protests over the issue have also drawn support from social activists, one of whom has moved the Orissa high court. While top state officials have found it advisable to keep quiet, the Puri administration has clarified that it was not a case of sale as was being made out. Instead, those people who gave their land for the ambitious Puri heritage corridor project have been sought to be rehabilitated with the allocation of a small part of the dharmasala’s vacant land, the administration said.

“Only a piece of vacant land (12.23%) has been utilised for the purpose of rehabilitation and resettlement for those who have given their land for temple development,” said a clarification note issued by the Puri administration.

But this contention of the administration has been rejected by the opposition parties as well as social activist Jagannath Bastia, who has challenged the move in the high court. “There are sale deeds to prove that the land has been sold. How can they claim that it is a case of land-for-land rehabilitation?” asks Bastia.

Indeed, the Puri administration itself has admitted in its clarification that out of 27 lodge owners displaced by the heritage project ‒ for which several buildings within a 75 metre radius of the Jagannath temple were demolished ‒ six have so far opted for land as settlement assistance to compensate their loss.

The state revenue department on June 5 granted permission for the execution of sale deeds for transfer of land to them, which was made on the payment of benchmark value. “With money involved, it is a clear case of sale, which is why sale deeds had to be made. The district collector is only a caretaker of the dharmasala property and has no right to sell it,” asserts Bastia.

Rejuvenation drive

Named after Babu Kankeyalal Bagala, the man who constructed it in 1905, the dharmasala, located barely 300 metres from the 12th century Jagannath temple, is a sprawling property spread over 2.738 acres. Later he donated the building and the attached land to the Lodging House Fund Committee, a government body headed by the Puri collector which was constituted under the Bihar and Orissa Places of Pilgrimage Act, 1920.

The dharmasala originally had 56 rooms and nine huge dormitories to provide shelter to poor pilgrims. The Lodging House Fund Committee added another 18 rooms to the structure.

In 2016-17, the India Tourism Development Corporation had demolished a portion of the dharmasala to reconstruct it with financial support from the Centre under the Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive (PRASAD) scheme. The plan was to rebuild the dilapidated hospice with a new name, Jagannath Bishramasthali at the cost of Rs 18 crore.

However, before the project could be completed, the Odisha government repealed the Bihar and Orissa Places of Pilgrimage Act, 1920 and the Lodging House Fund Committee, along with the dharmasala and its land, was merged with the Puri municipality. Sources said that last year, the land was transferred to the state Revenue and Disaster Management Department.

Jagannath temple in Puri. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Abhishek Barua CC BY SA 3.0

Things moved fast after that, with the state government pursuing the Puri heritage corridor project for the beautification of the temple town under the Rs 3,208 crore ‘Augmentation of Basic Amenities and Development of Heritage and Architecture’ (ABADHA) scheme. As part of this, several structures within the 75-metre radius of the Jagannath temple were demolished amidst protest from the local residents.

The people who lost land and their dwellings were promised suitable compensation. Sources said that around 35 decimal (12.23%) of the Bagala dharmasala land was sold between August 5 and August 12 to six lodge owners who were evicted during the demolition drive around the 12th-century shrine.

Political storm

Major opposition parties and activists accuse Puri collector Balwant Singh of violating the law by sanctioning the transfer of the land from the Puri municipality to the Revenue and Disaster Management department and then selling a part of it.

“The dharmasala land was relinquished in favour of the Revenue and Disaster Management department, which is not acceptable. This was followed by an equally questionable move like the sale of a portion of this land. The Puri collector, as only a caretaker of this land, cannot make the sale,” said former Congress MLA from Balikuda, Lalatendu Mohapatra.

The Puri administration’s move was also criticised by BJP national spokesperson Sambit Patra, who unsuccessfully contested the Puri Lok Sabha seat in 2019. State BJP general secretary Golak Mohapatra described the step as unfortunate, saying that the dharmasala meant for the accommodation of poor pilgrims from different parts of the country had been turned into a commercial proposition. “If the administration wanted to compensate land losers with land, it could have chosen any other place for allotment. Why this iconic hospice which has been providing cheap accommodation to pilgrims coming to Puri from different parts of the country?” asked Mohapatra.

On the other hand, the Biju Janata Dal’s leaders like Puri MP Pinaki Mishra and party general secretary Bijay Nayak have jumped to the defence of the administration. Nayak, in fact, slammed the opposition for trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. “At a time when chief minister Naveen Patnaik is trying hard to turn Puri into a world class heritage city, some people are deliberately trying to create hurdles in the path of the project. The protests over the issue are politically motivated but people will see through them,” asserted Nayak.

Shree Jagannath Temple Funds Will Be Deposited in Nationalised Banks

A task force will also be formed under the chairmanship of the Revenue and Disaster Management department secretary to locate Lord Jagannath’s land in Odisha and outside the state.

Bhubaneswar: The Shree Jagannath Temple Managing Committee has decided to deposit the temples funds in nationalized banks instead of private banks or financial institutions.

The decision in this regard was taken at the managing committee meeting presided over by ‘Gajapati Maharaja’ of Puri Dibyasingha Deb.

“It has been decided to deposit the temple funds in nationalised banks on a priority basis. The bank which will offer more interest rate will be preferred,” Chief Administrator of the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) Krishan Kumar said on Wednesday.

He said the funds now deposited in a private bank will be withdrawn.

Official sources said the temple has a fund of about Rs 600 crore.

The SJTA has received applications from some nationalised banks to manage the temples fund.

“While the foundation fund of the temple will be kept in the State Bank of India, the corpus and the other temple fund will be kept in three nationalised banks. We will invite applications from nationalised banks and will keep 50% of the temple fund money in the bank, which will offer more interest rate,” Kumar said.

Of the remaining 50% fund, 25% fund will be kept in each of the two other nationalised banks in the same principle, he said.

This apart, Kumar said a task force will be formed under the chairmanship of the Revenue and Disaster Management department secretary to locate Lord Jagannaths land in Odisha and outside the state.

The managing committee also resolved that the ‘Gajapati Maharaj’ will write to the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) and other bodies which are holding Lord Jagannath’s unscheduled Rath Jatra in the country.

ISKCON will have its meeting at Mayapur in April this year and it will be attended by heads of all its branches in the country and abroad.

“A letter signed by the Gajapati Maharaj will be sent to the ISKCON meeting to express Shree Jagannath Temple, Puris displeasure over holding unscheduled Rath Jatras. It will also urge the ISKCON to stop such practice as it hurts public sentiments,” Ramachandra Dasmohapatra, a member of the managing committee said.

He said the state government will also be urged to formulate a legislation to bar organisations from holding unscheduled Rath Jatras of Lord Jagannath.

Can Religious Organisations Become the New Venture Capitalists?

Is it fair to use funds given in good faith for risky ventures, rather than safer social infrastructure projects like colleges and hospitals?

When one talks of wealth and philanthropy in the Indian context, the names which inevitably come to mind are Shiv Nadar, Azim Premji, and others like them. No one thinks of including the temples of Lord Venkatesh of Tirupati, of Padmanabhaswamy in Thiruvananthapuram, or of Vaishno Devi in the list. And yet their annual income runs into crores, ranging from Rs 1 lakh crores to Rs 105 crores.

A recent Supreme Court order revealed that the Jagannath temple in Puri was an extremely wealthy landowner, owning a mind-boggling 60,418 acres of land within and outside Odisha.

The land owned by the temple is apparently 15 times the size of the town of Puri. What’s more, it also owns several quarries and mines. There is no record of all the properties owned by the temple nor of the income generated from them. Hopefully, after the Supreme Court order to prepare such an inventory, a clear picture will emerge as to the exact size of such wealth and what it is being used for.

While Hurun’s philanthropy list and other such regularly track how much India’s richest individuals donate to philanthropy from their personal wealth annually, and rank them accordingly, there is no such accounting or ranking for religious organisations. It would indeed be innovative to rank religious organisations according to how they use their large pools of resources for the betterment of society and serve to motivate others.

In this connection, a suggestion recently made by Sunil Goyal in a column for the Indian Express deserves serious consideration.  Goyal suggests the investment of at least 5-10% of religious trust funds in venture capital, especially in small and medium enterprises and startups, so as to give a fillip to entrepreneurship, and with it, income and employment.

In a sense what Baba Ramdev has done is something similar: except he has used the money his disciples and admirers have given him to set up his own consumer product units, rather than invest them in others’ startups.

Also read: Shirdi Temple Trust Gives Rs 500 Crore Loan to Maharashtra Irrigation Project

While many of the bigger and better governed religious organisations like Tirupati Devasthanam, Dharmasthala Kshetra, and various gurudwaras and churches are undertaking development work, the investment has largely been in building non-profit educational or health care institutions. Sometimes it has been invested in making and selling products related to their religious activities such as Tirupati Devasthanam, making and selling laddoos for prasadam, or selling human hair donated by devotees for wigs.

Other activities related to worship such as growing flowers, making and selling flower garlands or incense and so on, do generate income and employment, but this is an ancillary product incidental to the worship, and not initiated by the organisations themselves to generate employment. Though there is certainly scope for such investment, one is not aware of direct investment of religious funds in for-profit ventures undertaken by others, such as investment in transport, building of hotels and guest houses, providing cheap solar energy, producing bottled water, in religious travel and tourism, or building check dams.

While it may be laudable as an objective, the first concern that arises in connection with such venture funding is that typically,  venture fund investments in large scale projects involve risks, and a willingness to stay the course for the long term. On the one hand, since the funds of religious organisations do not belong to any one individual, the risk is spread over numbers of donors.

At the same time, is it fair to use funds given in good faith for risky ventures, rather than safer social infrastructure projects like colleges and hospitals, afforestation and the like? After all, the goal of any religious organisation is not to make profits but to use devotee donations for the benefit of the devotees themselves or for the larger society.

Moreover, using devotee donations in such a way will require an amendment in the laws pertaining to religious trusts to allow them to invest in projects unconnected with their religious objectives. It will also require an amendment of the Income Tax laws which pertains to modes of investment allowed to charitable and religious trusts.

In addition, if the funds are invested as equity for purely profit purposes, it will raise many questions such as: Will the investment be a grant, loan or equity? What kind of startups should be allowed? Only those which are of social benefit, related to the objects of worship,  or any commercial venture?

Also read: Rich Gods and Poor People in the Era of Commercialised Religion

One idea which can be explored is a partnership of the religious organisation with government in local or even national development projects, in a manner similar to that of a corporate-government partnership, so that religious funds do not remain idle, and government gains needed resources.  A more comprehensive discussion would surely help this interesting idea in becoming a reality.

Pushpa Sundar is the author of Giving With A Thousand Hands: The Changing Face of Indian Philanthropy

No Relief from SC for Analyst Who Joked About Konark Temple

Noting that Abhijit Iyer-Mitra’s remarks about the temple had incited religious feelings, a bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi refused to intervene.

New Delhi: Two weeks after security analyst and media commentator Abhijit Iyer-Mitra was arrested by the Delhi police for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Odisha’s famous Sun Temple at Konark, the Supreme Court denied him protection from arrest.

The decision was taken by the bench headed by newly-appointed Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.

When Iyer-Mitra’s counsel argued that his life may be under threat, the CJI was quoted by PTI as saying, “If your client is facing threats, there is no better place than jail.”

Noting that Iyer-Mitra’s remarks about the temple had incited religious feelings, the bench dismissed his bail petition and said that prison would be the safest place for him for now. Iyer-Mitra had previously been granted bail on a bond of Rs 1 lakh by a Delhi court, and that protection was coming to an end on October 5.

Also read: Odisha Police Arrest Commentator for Satirical Video on Konark Monument

Odisha police had earlier told the court that Mitra “gave unpalatable and irresponsible remarks on [the] Konark Sun Temple by uploading his views on social media with an intention to outrage and to wound religious feeling which may create communal fraction”. The police said the “accused took his photograph along with some portion of Konark Sun Temple and he tweeted against the Odiya people”. The tweets were made on September 14.

The accompanying video, however, made it clear Iyer-Mitra was speaking in jest.

Iyer-Mitra was accompanying former BJD leader Baijayant Panda and another journalist, Aarti Tikoo Singh, in a chopper when he shot the video. Panda, who is a licensed helicopter pilot, had taken the two for a flight over the Sun Temple, the Jagannath Temple, Puri and Chilika Lake.

Iyer-Mitra’s comments had sparked a furore in the Odisha assembly. The speaker even constituted a house committee to probe the matter. The leader of opposition in the Odisha Assembly and Congress member Narasingha Mishra had said: “There are two video clips that show a non-Odia, RSS man standing in front of the Konark temple making comments… Abhijit Iyer’s remarks have disrespected and hurt the sentiments of the people of Odisha and the Odia language. He should be summoned to the state, and the House should decide on the quantum of punishment.”

A case was filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 153-A (promoting enmity between different groups on the ground of religion, grace, place of birth, residence, language etc) and 295-A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs). If convicted, the accused may get a maximum of three-year jail term.

Odisha Police Arrest Commentator for Satirical Video on Konark Monument

Journalist and security analyst Abhijit Iyer-Mitra was arrested by the Delhi police on Thursday for his remarks about the Sun Temple, after his video caused an uproar in the Odisha assembly.

New Delhi: Journalist and security analyst Abhijit Iyer-Mitra has become the latest victim of the growing tendency of law enforcement authorities across India to criminalise free speech, with the police arresting him on Thursday for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Odisha’s famous Sun Temple at Konark.

Hours after being picked up by the Delhi police, he was granted bail until September 28.

Earlier in the day, opposition parties in Odisha created a furore in the assembly to push the Biju Janata Dal-led state government to investigate the matter, as they felt it “hurt the religious sentiments” of the Odia people.  

OTV reported that following the assembly debate debate led by the Congress leader and currently the leader of opposition, Narasingha Mishra, speaker Pradip Amat “approved the proposal for a house committee to investigate the matter”.

Iyer-Mitra’s lawyer, Nikhil Mehra, confirmed to The Wire that he was arrested in Delhi.

The outcry over his comments started on September 15 when the analyst posted a video on social media of himself standing in front of some friezes making the following comment in Hindi, tongue firmly in cheek:

“Bhaiyon aur behanon. I am in Odisha’s famous Konark Temple. This is not a temple but a humple where people are humping. See these sculptures… Women with women, men with animals. Can this be a holy place? Not al all. This is a conspiracy against Hindus by Muslims who want to keep us down! I want to only say Jai Sriram! In our new Ram Temple, such obscene sculptures will not be there!”

The English translation does not capture the satirical nature of the Hindi comment, which is evident in the video, which ends with some off camera laughter.

Iyer-Mitra was accompanying former BJD leader Baijayant Panda and another journalist, Aarti Tikoo Singh, in a chopper when he shot the video. Panda, who is a licensed helicopter pilot, had taken the two for a flight over the Sun Temple, the Jagannath Temple, Puri and Chilika Lake.

Soon after he posted the video, BJD and Congress MLAs created an uproar, claiming that he had hurt the pride and religious sentiments of Odisha, and demanded action against him. Their campaign spilled over to an assembly discussion and later led to his arrest. Panda’s chopper was also seized by the Odisha police for allegedly flying over the Chilika Lake, an eco-sensitive zone.

Both Panda and Aarti Tikoo Singh came to his defence:

Panda, too, accused the Odisha government of high-handedness and trying to “handicap his movement”.

“Given the fact that Panda is now opposed to both the BJD and the Congress, it appears Abhijit became the fall guy for accompanying Panda and making those remarks,” a senior journalist in Bhubaneswar told The Wire, on the condition of anonymity.

He said the claim that Iyer-Mitra’s comment hurt religious sentiment seems implausible as the Sun Temple no longer even functions as a temple. “It is only a tourist site. No worship happens there. Both Konark and Khajuraho depict Indian sexuality from the ancient past. Everyone knows that. To make it a political issue, and then a police case, is stretching the issue a little too far,” he added.  

The fact that BJD and Congress MLAs both went after Iyer-Mitra suggests wider political factors may be at play. Joint dharnas were also also staged by the Congress and BJD inside the premises of the assembly. The leader of opposition then moved a privilege motion against Iyer-Mitra and the speaker approved it. The speaker has also constituted a committee headed by Mishra to probe the matter further.  

BJD and Congress MLAs also saw an RSS hand in defaming the Sun Temple. BJD MLA Sanjay Dasburma said, “It (Iyer-Mitra’s video) is an insult to the state and its existence. Action should be taken against the man.”

Similarly, Narasingha Mishra said, “There are two video clips which show a non-Odia, RSS man standing in front of Konark Temple making comments… Remarks of Abhijit Iyer have disrespected and hurt the sentiments of the people of Odisha and Odia language. He should be summoned to the state and the house should decide on the quantum of punishment.”

The BJP in Odisha, meanwhile, has said that Iyer-Mitra is not a BJP member and urged political parties to refrain from making the issue political.