Time to Have a Proper Code of Conduct in India Inc Boards

When board members engage in bribery and corruption, they encourage unfair competition, distort business decisions, and work against the company’s written values. The code of conduct must explicitly promote transparency and ethical behaviour.

Indian stock markets may be growing but are plagued by many distorting forces including price-rigging, insider trading, opaque financials and overall poor adherence to regulation. Clearly, these are indicators of poor governance and an absence of a proper code of conduct in boards.

A couple of years ago five out of 24 insider trading cases investigsated by SEBI were Adani Group companies and there was also the allegation that one of the SEBI directors investigating was a relative of Adani.  Even the darling of stock markets Reliance was found to indulge in insider trading and was fined Rs 25 crore and Ambani was fined Rs 15 crore in recent years.

From Satyam and IL&FS to Kingfisher and Jet and Adani, there have been numerous cases. Crucial to eliminating this is the adherence to ethical behaviour, starting at the board level. The independent directors need to play a truly independent role in holding management accountable. 

There are some common issues related to poor board code of conduct in Indian enterprises. First is the dominance of promoters in the boardrooms. In many Indian companies, promoters (founders or controlling shareholders) hold significant influence on the board. This makes it difficult for independent directors to raise concerns or challenge management decisions. Second is the lack of independent oversight. Sometimes, independent directors may not have the necessary expertise or resources to scrutinise complex financial statements or business decisions. Finally, there are conflicts of interest. Board members might have personal or financial ties to the company or its management, creating a conflict of interest that hinders objective decision-making.

Typically, there are three major unethical practices India Inc should be cognizant of, and avoid in developing a code of conduct. One, insider trading, which occurs when directors or someone else on their behalf trade stocks based on privy confidential information. This unethical practice is against the market integrity and torpedoes investor confidence. Insider traders gain an unfair advantage over other investors. Not only does this violate the principle of fairness but also the integrity of stock exchanges. Most regulators have banned this across the world and it is illegal. The low penalties in India are not a deterrent unless combined with jail term.

Ethical and legal standards are a must for board members to avoid the incidents of insider trading. The maintenance of strict confidentiality and restriction on own enterprise stock trading might be necessary. The code of conduct must outline clear policies and procedures that prohibit insider trading, along with educating board members about their obligations. 

Two, bribery and corruption, which involve giving, offering, receiving or soliciting money, favours or benefits to influence business decisions or get undue advantages over rivals. Though the Modi government preached clean governance, the electoral bonds saga unfolding currently shows a totally different picture in this respect. How the State Bank of India (SBI) board will react to the chairman’s behaviour against Supreme Court order will be interesting to watch. Unless Indian mindset is totally against this, it is not easy to find a solution other than enforcing stringent laws like in the Nordic countries or the USA.

When board members engage in bribery and corruption, they encourage unfair competition, distort business decisions, and work against the company’s written values. The code of conduct must explicitly promote transparency and ethical behaviour. A robust internal control mechanism should be put in place, and a thorough due diligence on business partners must be undertaken. Offer anti-corruption training if needed.

Also read: BJP Received Almost 90% of All Corporate Donations to Political Parties in 2022-23

Three, not acting in the best interests of shareholders. This is a neglect of the board’s fiduciary responsibilities. This unethical behaviour can lead to decisions that will benefit a select few, or neglect the larger enterprise interests. Such neglect of fiduciary duties can lead to legal action against the board including shareholder lawsuits, regulatory investigations or ED action (not necessarily for Electoral Bonds). In all these cases, financial penalties will be levied, not to mention reputation damage and even removal as board members — all these will result in possible loss of market value as in Adani and Hindenberg report.

A proper board code of conduct serves as a guiding framework to uphold integrity, ethics, and accountability in their roles as stewards of corporate governance. Here are some components of board code of conduct India Inc can adopt:

Ethical standards and integrity: Directors are expected to act with honesty, transparency, and fairness in all their dealings, both within the organisation and with external stakeholders. Avoid conflicts of interest, respect confidentiality, and adhere to legal and regulatory requirements.

Fiduciary duties and responsibilities: Outline these duties, including the duty of care, duty of loyalty, and duty of obedience. Directors are expected to exercise due diligence, prudence, and independent judgement in fulfilling their responsibilities and making decisions that benefit the company as a whole.

Boardroom behaviour and collaboration: Proper boardroom behaviour is essential for a culture of respect, professionalism, and collaboration among directors. Specify expectations for meetings, including punctuality, preparedness, active participation, and constructive dialogue. Directors should demonstrate mutual respect, listen to diverse viewpoints, and work together to achieve common goals.

Confidentiality and information security: Board  has access to sensitive and confidential information about the company, its operations, and its strategic plans. Emphasise the importance of maintaining confidentiality and safeguarding proprietary information. Directors should exercise discretion and caution when handling confidential matters and avoid disclosing privileged information without proper authorisation.

Compliance and regulatory requirements: Compliance with laws, regulations, and corporate governance standards is critical. Directors must stay informed about applicable laws and regulations, adhere to corporate policies and procedures, and disclose any potential conflicts of interest. 

In the end, a company will be mostly as ethical as its founders are. In the midst of the current EB episode, Biocon chief Kiran Mazumdar Shaw was one of the first to come out and clarify the donations publicly. Salute to such chairpersons!

M. Muneer is a Fortune-500 advisor, startup investor and co-founder of the non-profit Medici Institute for Innovation. He tweets @MuneerMuh.



SAT Quashes SEBI’s Insider Trading Order Against NDTV Co-Founders Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy

SAT said that the information scrutinised by SEBI was not price-sensitive, and the Roys were not insiders.

New Delhi: The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has quashed an insider trading order by capital markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, the co-founders of NDTV.

The order, issued by SEBI in November 2020, accused them of insider trading and barred them from accessing the capital markets for two years. It had directed them to disgorge the amount wrongfully gained – over Rs 16.97 crore – along with 6% interest per annum.

According to Business Standard, SAT overturned the order, saying that the information scrutinised by SEBI was not price-sensitive, and the Roys were not insiders.

“We find that Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy received pre-trade clearance from NDTV’s compliance officer, a fact acknowledged in the show cause notice. Therefore, the trades executed by these two individuals were in line with NDTV’s Code of Conduct and the PIT Regulations,” SAT observed, per the business daily.

The issue pertained to trades conducted between September 2007 and April 2008, involving allegations of an illicit gain of nearly Rs 17 crore.

This SAT order vindicates the Supreme Court’s intervention more than two years ago when the top court stayed the SEBI order and ruled that Radhika and Prannoy Roy do not have to pay any fine.

SEBI had on December 24, 2020 imposed Rs 27 crore penalty on the three NDTV promoters – Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and RRPR Holding Limited – for failing to disclose price-sensitive information to shareholders of NDTV.

In January 2021, SAT directed the NDTV promoters to deposit 50% of the disgorged amount before SEBI within four weeks.

In February of that year, the Supreme Court directed SAT not to insist on deposit of fines as a pre-condition for hearing their appeals against SEBI’s orders.

On March 27, 2021, the Supreme Court stayed the recovery of penalty on the NDTV promoters.

Insider Trading: SAT Blocks SEBI Order Barring Future Group CEO Biyani From Markets

The tribunal has asked Future Group promoters to deposit a sum of Rs 110 million as an interim measure.

Mumbai: The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has blocked market regulator SEBI’s order that barred Future Group chief executive Kishore Biyani from the securities markets for a year, over accusations of insider trading in 2017, a group company said on Tuesday.

Biyani is also embroiled in a legal battle with Amazon.com Inc over the sale of Future’s retail assets to Reliance Industries.

“Future Group promoters have been asked to deposit a sum of Rs 110 million as an interim measure,” Future Corporate Resources said in a statement, adding that the tribunal had stayed the Securities and Exchange Board of India order.

SEBI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Also read: A Look Inside an Amazon Warehouse – Where Profits Are Placed Ahead of Workers

The regulator had said Biyani and his brother Anil had traded in shares of their Future Retail firm through a group company on the basis of unpublished price-sensitive information.

SEBI said its investigation showed the two opened a trading account for a company called Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd, which traded in shares of Future Retail before a demerger of some businesses of the latter boosted its share price.

Challenging the order on Monday before the SAT, Future said the information was already in the public domain and that while the shares were bought in March 2017, the actual terms of the restructuring began in April.

The case will next be heard on April 12, Future Corporate Resources said.

Amazon has appealed in the Supreme Court to block the Future-Reliance deal, saying it violates some pre-existing contracts with Future.

(Reuters)

SEBI Bars Future Group CEO Kishore Biyani From Securities Market in Insider Trading Case

Biyani is separately fighting a legal challenge from Amazon over the sale of Future’s retail assets.

Mumbai: Markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on Wednesday barred Future Group chief executive Kishore Biyani and his brother Anil from accessing the securities market for a year after investigating insider trading in shares of its retail firm Future Retail in 2017.

SEBI said the two brothers traded in shares of Future Retail through a group company on the basis of unpublished price sensitive information before a demerger of certain businesses of Future Retail that pushed its share price higher.

A spokesman for Future and the two Biyani brothers did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Also read: A Look Inside an Amazon Warehouse – Where Profits Are Placed Ahead of Workers

The SEBI investigation found that the Biyanis opened a trading account for an entity named Future Corporate Resources Private Limited, which traded in Future Retail’s shares before the demerger decision was made public.

SEBI also barred Biyani from trading in Future Retail shares for two years. Future Corporate Resources and the two Biyani brothers will each need to pay a penalty of Rs 1 crore ($137,099) within 45 days, SEBI said.

Kishore Biyani is separately fighting a legal challenge from Amazon.com Inc over the sale of Future’s retail assets.

A court in New Delhi blocked Future Group’s sale of retail assets to Reliance Industries on Tuesday. Future has said its retail unit faces insolvency if the deal fails.

(Reuters)

NDTV to Appeal SEBI Ruling Baring Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy, Others for ‘Insider Trading’

The directions follow a probe conducted by the markets regulator between September 2006 and June 2008 wherein various violations of insider trading regulations were found.

New Delhi: Markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has barred NDTV promoters, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy, from the securities market for two years and also directed them to disgorge illegal gains of more than Rs. 16.97 crore for indulging in insider trading more than 12 years ago.

However, NDTV in a statement later on Saturday said Sebi’s order “is based on an inaccurate assessment of facts”. The company will appeal against it.

The statement was issued by lawyers led by Fereshte Sethna, senior partner at DMD Advocates, who represent NDTV founders Radhika Roy and Prannoy Roy, according to Economic Times.

Besides, the watchdog has barred seven individuals and entities for insider trading in the shares of the company for a period varying from one to two years. Also, some of them have been asked to disgorge illegal gains made from trading in the shares when they were in possession of unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI).

The directions follow a probe conducted by the markets regulator between September 2006 and June 2008 wherein various violations of insider trading regulations were found.

The amount has to be paid jointly or severally by them along with 6% interest from April 17, 2008 till the date of actual payment.

All the entities have violated prohibition of insider trading (PIT) Regulations, Sebi said in three separate orders passed late on Friday.

SEBI noted that Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy together made a gain of Rs. 16.97 crore while indulging in insider trading in the shares of New Delhi Television Ltd (NDTV) while in possession of UPSI relating to the proposed reorganisation of the company.

Prannoy Roy was the chairman and whole-time director and Radhika Roy was the managing director during period under investigation and were part of the decision-making chain that had led to crystallisation of the UPSI.

Discussions pertaining to reorganisation of the company started on September 7, 2007 and the disclosure was made on April 16, 2008.

Hence, September 7, 2007 to April 16, 2008 was UPSI period.

Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy sold shares on April 17, 2008, when the trading window for them was closed and made a profit of Rs. 16,97,38,335.

By doing so, they violated PIT norms and also acted in contravention of NDTV’s code of conduct for prevention of insider trading which prohibited them from trading at least till 24 hours after the information was disclosed to the stock exchanges.

The Roys have been restrained from accessing the securities market for two years and directed to disgorge illegal gains along with 6% interest per annum.

Vikramaditya Chandra, who was the group CEO and executive director during the relevant period, made a profit of Rs. 6.67 lakh; Ishwari Prasad Bajpai, who was senior advisor – editorial and projects, made illegal gains of Rs. 8.82 lakh; while director finance and group CFO Saurav Banerjee incurred a loss of Rs. 47,000 while trading in NDTV’s scrip during the UPSI period.

The shares which were sold during the UPSI period were acquired by them pursuant to allotment under employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs).

Sebi has thus directed disgorgement of respective illegal gains along with 6% interest per annum and barred Chandra, Bajpai and Banerjee from accessing securities market for one year.

Also, Sanjay Dutt’s wife Prenita Dutt and entities connected to him — Quantum Securities Pvt Ltd, SAL Real Estate Pvt Ltd and Taj Capital Partners Pvt Ltd — had made a wrongful gain of ₹2.2 crore through insider trading while in possession of UPSI.

Sanjay Dutt was an on-call and in house advisor/team member of NDTV group the scope of his work included responsibility and accountability for the corporate finance and strategic planning function of the firm.

During the period of investigation, the firm had filed six price sensitive information to exchanges.

He was in possession of or has had access to price sensitive information and had communicated the same to his wife, Prenita Dutt, and entities connected to him – Quantum Securities, SAL Real Estate and Taj Capital Partners – which, in turn, traded in the shares of NDTV during the UPSI period and made illegal gains of Rs. 2.2 crore.

Therefore, SEBI has directed disgorgement of the illegal gains which is to be paid by them jointly or severally along with 6% interest and also barred all the entities including Sanjay Dutt from accessing securities market for two years.

Note: This article has been updated since publication with NDTV’s response.

(With PTI inputs)

Amazon Asks SEBI to Probe Future Retail for Insider Trading

The US giant has been pressing SEBI to review Reliance’s August deal to buy retail, logistics and other assets from Future Group for $3.4 billion including debt.

New Delhi: Amazon.com Inc has asked market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to investigate Future Retail Ltd for insider trading, a letter seen by Reuters showed, as it seeks to prevent its business partner from becoming part of rival Reliance’s empire.

The US giant has been pressing SEBI to review Reliance’s August deal to buy retail, logistics and other assets from Future Group for $3.4 billion including debt.

Amazon argues it had a 2019 agreement with Future which prevented the Indian group’s retail assets from being sold to certain parties including Reliance Industries Ltd, which is led by Asia’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani.

The November 8 letter to SEBI alleges Future Retail disclosed to Reliance price sensitive details of an injunction granted by a Singapore arbitrator to block the deal.

The spat is being closely watched as a key test of whether Indian firms, courts and regulators will respect arbitration decisions made in accordance with overseas arbitration rules, and adds to headaches for Amazon in India which is also dealing with antitrust challenges.

The injunction was granted on Sunday October 25 and was reported by media with Amazon issuing a short statement saying it welcomed the decision.

Reliance later that evening said in a stock exchange filing that it had been informed of the arbitration order and would enforce its rights to complete the deal with Future without delay.

It is this October 25 filing which Amazon argues in its 20-page letter that indicates Ambani’s group was privy to “price sensitive” details of the injunction.

Ambani’s group “was not a party to the arbitration proceedings… and could have received details related thereto only from FRL (Future Retail) or its promoters,” said the letter.

A spokesman for Future Group said in a statement to Reuters it denies the allegations made in the letter and that news of the injunction was in the public domain from Sunday.

Reliance and SEBI did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. Amazon declined to comment on the letter’s contents.

Future Retail, which has argued that Amazon‘s agreement last year was only with a separate Future Group unit, issued a statement to the stock exchange on the morning of October 26 saying it was examining the arbitration order and that it believed the order would have to be tested by Indian law.

Future Group, which operates supermarkets and high-end food stores and has more than 1,500 outlets across India, has argued it entered into the deal to sell retail assets to Reliance because its business was severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic and it was critical to protect all its stakeholders.

It remains to be seen whether Indian courts and regulators will side with Amazon or Future Retail. Future Retail has asked a New Delhi court for an order to restrain Amazon from approaching Indian regulators to block its deal with Reliance. Hearings on the case began on Tuesday.

(Reuters)

US SEC Charges Three Indians in Insider Trading Ring Spanning Three Countries

Rajeshwar Gannamaneni provided nonpublic information about impending mergers, acquisitions, and tender offers to his wife, Deepthi Gandra and his father, Linga Rao Gannamaneni, the Securities and Exchange Commission said in a statement. 

New York: An Indian IT contractor, his wife and father have been charged in the US with insider trading after he illegally tipped them with confidential client information he stole while working in the Singapore branch of an investment bank.

Rajeshwar Gannamaneni, 36, is a citizen of India with a last known residence in Singapore. He provided nonpublic information about impending mergers, acquisitions, and tender offers to his wife, Deepthi Gandra, 33 and his father, Linga Rao Gannamaneni, 68 who lives in India, The Securities and Exchange Commission said in a statement.

The SEC obtained a court-ordered freeze of assets in three US brokerage accounts and one US bank account connected to the alleged trading. The SEC’s complaint alleges that between December 2013 and August 2016, Gannamaneni abused his position as a senior software consultant at the investment bank and accessed sensitive, highly-confidential information concerning at least 40 mergers, acquisitions, tender offers and other significant corporate events of the investment bank’s clients.

Also Read: Shares of Yes Bank Plunge as Chairperson Ashok Chawla Steps Down Over Corruption Charges

Gannamaneni then illegally traded on that information and shared it with his father and wife who unlawfully traded on it, collectively realizing illicit profits of about USD 600,000.

He also allegedly traded in an account that he controlled that was opened in the name of a family member, who was living in the US at the time. Gannamaneni asked this family member, a cousin who at the time lived in Virginia, to open an investment account at an American brokerage firm, so that he could place trades in this account from Singapore.

“As alleged in our complaint, Gannamaneni abused his work-related access to sensitive, market-moving nonpublic information to enrich himself and those he tipped,” said Kelly L. Gibson, Associate Director of Enforcement in the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office. “Our continued use of innovative analytical tools to find suspicious trading patterns and expose misconduct demonstrates our resolve to catch insider traders who seek to take illegal advantage of the US markets for personal gain.”

The SEC’s complaint charges the defendants with fraud and seeks disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains, pre-judgment interest, penalties, and injunctive relief.

(PTI)

WhatsApp Earnings Leak Shows SEBI Must Monitor Insider Trading on Social Media

This new technology presents a challenge but the problem of insider trading is hardly new. The regulator must rise to this new challenge if it is to maintain its reputation for efficiency.

This new technology presents a challenge but the problem of insider trading is hardly new. The regulator must rise to this new challenge if it is to maintain its reputation for efficiency.

Messages were being circulated in private Whatsapp groups frequented by equity traders. Credit: Reuters

The Securities and Exchange Board of India will investigate possible leaks of company earnings in social media chatrooms after a Reuters investigation documented at least 12 cases of prescient messages about major Indian companies being posted in private WhatsApp groups. This author explains why SEBI should try to create means of observing this medium and others like it.

A recent Reuters news report identifies a dozen messages that accurately predicted Q2 earnings patterns (and a bonus announcement in one case) for specific listed stocks. In each case, the messages were being passed around, just before the results were officially announced. These messages were being circulated in private Whatsapp groups frequented by equity traders. These were all big companies – in fact, more than half of the stock concerned are members of the Nifty-50.

WhatsApp, an instant messaging service owned by Facebook, is a popular platform for all sorts of sensitive communications. It is encrypted end-to-end, making it impossible for even the service provider to monitor content.

There are many private groups of equity traders on the Whatsapp platform and the circulation of messages claiming to have credible “khabar” seems to be quite common. Such messages are often wildly inaccurate, and sometimes they are just rehashes of known consensus estimates. But in the cases mentioned in this report, the messages were extremely accurate and much closer to the reality of the results than the consensus estimates.

Even in such cases, it is unclear if the messages consist of genuine inside information or merely of accurate guesses based on public information. Dissemination of the former would be illegal under India’s insider trading laws, even if nobody traded upon the information.

Assuming that such a message is being circulated, finding the origin of the message is technically possible because the Whatsapp service has a time-stamp and the service provider could trace the phone number from where the message initially originated. In addition, SEBI has the power to call up transaction records from the exchanges and to check if there has been unusual trading patterns in a given stock at the critical period to tie any such trading patterns to any messages.

Given the accuracy of some of the messages cited by the report, the regulator, SEBI, should definitely take cognisance of the situation and carry out an investigation. If it does discover that any of these messages originated from insiders, SEBI has the power to hand out prison sentences, or fines, or both.

More broadly, SEBI should try to create means of observing this medium and others like it. While Whatsapp is the most popular of the encrypted instant message platforms, there are several others like it. Other market regulators such as America’s SEC also have to deal with the issue of price-sensitive information being passed through such mediums.

It is not easy given the end-to-end encryption but it is possible for example, to set up specialised units to track and monitor such a medium. It is also possible for SEBI to set up an email id, for example, where such messages can be anonymously forwarded for analysis. That would give the regulator some idea about the scale of the problem and an opportunity to judge which messages are credible and actionable and worth following up.

This new technology presents a challenge but the problem of insider trading is hardly new. The regulator must rise to this new challenge if it is to maintain its reputation for efficiency.

By arrangement with Business Standard.