Reclaiming the Hanuman Chalisa: A Timeless Poem for Turbulent Times, Reborn in Translation

In his English translation of the Hanuman Chalisa, Vikram Seth gives the Chalisa back to those of us who have always loved it and presents it as it should be known and understood to those who are not familiar with it and to those who have been persuaded to misunderstand it.

I cannot think of anything better in these times of upheaval and distress than the Hanuman Chalisa given to us in English by Vikram Seth. It was waiting for me when I came home from giving a Ramayana lecture one evening and my heart soared, as if Hanuman himself had come to tell me not to worry, to let him take over the weight of my discomforts and the troubles of the world. He is, after all, the sankata-haran, “crisis dispeller,” as Seth defines him in translation. 


The Hanuman Chalisa, Vikram Seth, Speaking Tiger, 2024.

Seth’s translation is pitch perfect – this is no small achievement with a text written in tight couplets with a strict metrical scheme, a text with rhyme and rhythm and a text that is well-known and well-loved. Seth talks extensively in his interviews about the difficulty of confronting the falling, ‘feminine’ metres of the original and finding something equally aurally compelling for the English. You scarcely notice this for Seth’s Chalisa is smooth, bouncy, exuberant, playful, reflecting the sweetness of Hanuman’s nature. But Seth has also found the numen that suggests the presence of divinity and is able to share the overwhelming sense of love and devotion with which the poem is imbued. 

The Chalisa is attributed to the Awadhi poet Tulsidas, whose grand composition is the Ramcharitamanas, the story of Lord Ram composed in the 16th century. Tulsidas was a Hanuman bhakt, believing that it was the strong, courageous and big-hearted monkey who was the doorway to Ram’s infinite grace and all-consuming love. For all that Tulsi’s Manas is steeped in devotion to Ram, it is this lyrical and joyous incantation that celebrates the marvellous monkey who is both the paradigmatic bhakt and a metaphor for the human soul’s relationship with the divine. Ram’s perfection might be intimidating, but Hanuman is accessible to everyone – the Chalisa expresses this openness more than any other text.

What is it that makes this poem so beloved? After all, it is pretty simple in form and content. Chaupais have an attractive rhythm, they are easy to learn and to remember and to recite. The Chalisa’s chaupais and dohas introduce Hanuman with epithets and list his many good qualities – son of the Wind, ocean of knowledge, and so forth. Then they describe his beloved form with his tawny, tightly curled fur and his massive arms, his gold earrings, the mace he carries on his shoulder. They move on to speak of his exploits and adventures in Ram’s quest for Sita, they recount his courage, his wit, his wisdom, his selfless devotion. The Chalisa ends with a litany of blessing that Hanuman showers upon those that love him and all that a bhakt will gain by worshipping him, including boons from Sita and access to Ram himself.

Also read: Feminine Spirituality Unbound: Exploring ‘Wild Women’ in Indian Poetry

Surely, the magnetic power of the Chalisa has to do with the popularity of Hanuman as a character. He stands apart in a magnificent story that is filled with heroic and charismatic creatures, to say nothing of God himself. Anyone who was watched a Ramlila will know the lifting of the spirit when Hanuman comes on stage – children and grandfathers alike will cheer when the monkey arrives, there will be cheers and whistles and hooting and clapping. Grandmothers will weep gentle tears of love and wipe their eyes and smile. The tension of the story has broken and we are relieved, for everyone knows that from this point on, Ram’s quest will bear fruit, Ravan will be vanquished and Sita will be rescued, unharmed. Even readers of the Ramayan experience this same sense of relief when Hanuman makes his appearance in the Kishkindha Kanda – the dark clouds that have hitherto accompanied the exiled prince whose wife has been abducted have parted to let in a ray of sunshine. Or, rather, they have been blown away by Pavanasuta, Hanuman, the Son of the Wind. 

Most of us from northern India know the Chalisa to be the constant companion to millions and millions of people and a particularly dominant chorus in the soundscape of any morning. It is recited in temples and homes, it is accompanied by the ringing of bells, it is muttered in walks to the market, it is spoken in the mind and with the voice. It is owned equally by those who are are sad and by those who are happy, it provides comfort as well as courage. It is truly everywhere and all the time. However, it would be remiss to ignore the fact that the Chalisa belongs almost entirely to men, more so in the public realm. Hanuman lies at the centre of an essentially masculinist cult, be it as patron of police forces or as a totem in wrestling akhadas. He has also been the inspiration for private vigilantes such as the Bajrang Dal and other quasi-military groups.

It goes without saying, however, that the Hanuman of the Chalisa could not be even a distant cousin of these groups nor of the aggressive Hanuman decal that has recently come to adorn both private and public vehicles.

The last ten years have seen this increasingly militant Hanuman, not just in iconography but also in remade, remixed and newly musicalised versions of the Chalisa. The beautiful poem has become martial and is often accompanied by war-like images of destruction on video. Seth’s translation reclaims the text from this aggression. He gives the Chalisa back to those of us who have always loved it and presents it as it should be known and understood to those who are not familiar with it and to those who have been persuaded to misunderstand it. How fitting it is that the book is released at a time when so many of us are ready to reclaim so much of what has been take away from us. May Hanuman be with us as we fight the rakshasas. 

Arshia Sattar is a translator and teaches classical Indian literatures at various institutes across the country. 

Watch: Vikram Seth on His Translation of the Hanuman Chalisa, Narendra Modi and a Suitable Girl

Vikram Seth talks about his decision to translate the Chalisa, why he waited for over a decade to publish it, why he’s dedicated it to one of his fictional characters from A Suitable Boy, what the Chalisa means to him, how he distinguishes between Hinduism and Hindutva, how he views the Narendra Modi government and, more importantly, Modi himself.

Highly regarded novelist Vikram Seth has just translated the Hanuman Chalisa and it’s a particularly enchanting translation because he’s captured both the rhyme and rhythm of the original – thus conveying the incantatory pleasure of the Hindi and Awadhi versions.

In an interview with The Wire, Seth talks about his decision to translate the Chalisa, why he waited for over a decade to publish it, why he’s dedicated it to one of his fictional characters from A Suitable Boy, what the Chalisa means to him, how he distinguishes between Hinduism and Hindutva, how he views the Narendra Modi government and, more importantly, Modi himself.

Vikram Seth also talks about what has happened to Arundhati Roy and the wider attempt to cow journalists, artists, authors, businessmen, the judiciary, politicians, etc.

MP: Bajrang Dal Activists Protest Against Namaz at Bhopal Mall

‘Bajrang Dal members will recite Hanuman Chalisa and Sundar Kand,’ a leader of the group said.

New Delhi: Activists of the Bajrang Dal on Saturday, August 28, staged a protest alleging that namaz was being offered inside a mall in Madhya Pradesh’s capital, Bhopal.

Videos of people offering namaz at a corner of the DB Mall and of protesters – some of whom chanted slogans and some others surrounding them – were circulated on social media on Saturday.

In the videos circulated, the activists outnumber the men offering namaz, who are seen in what appears to be a secluded part of the mall. A man, ostensibly a Hindutva activist, is heard asking other protesters to move from the front so that the photos of those offering namaz can be clicked.

The news agency PTI has reported that it was Bajrang Dal activists who shot videos of the prayers being offered.

Activists also argued with a representative of the mall’s management, threatening to would recite the ‘Hanuman Chalisa’ at the establishment.

“A police team was dispatched to the scene after getting information about the protest, but no untoward incident was reported,” MP Nagar police station in-charge Keshant Sharma said.

“When the police reached the scene, Bajrang Dal members were exiting the mall. No one has made any complaint in this regard so far,” he said.

Bajrang Dal Vibhag Sah-Sanyojak Abhijeet Singh Rajput, who led the protestors, said, “We have been getting information for the last one month that some people were offering namaz on the second floor of DB Mall. We reached there today and captured 10 to 12 people offering namaz.”

“The Bajrang Dal had raised an objection about this with the DB Mall management, but no official was present,” he said.

“We spoke to the security supervisors and warned them to stop the practise or the Bajrang Dal members will recite Hanuman Chalisa and Sundar Kand (a part of Ramayana),” Rajput said

Rajput alleged that while the supervisor had claimed that namaz was being offered in an enclosed place, it was being offered at an open space.

In July, Hindutva groups circulated a video which purportedly showed some Muslims offering namaz in Lulu mall of Uttar Pradesh’s Lucknow. This led to police action against those who had offered prayers, seven of whom where arrested. Despite being denied permission by the police, men entered the mall and chanted the Hanuman Chalisa there. Later, mall authorities released a statement saying that over 80% of its staff was “Hindu”.

Last year, Hindutva groups began disrupting Muslims’ Friday prayers at spots in Haryana which had earlier been demarcated for such prayers by the government itself. As the disruptions grew increasingly charged, Haryana chief minister M.L. Khattar announced the withdrawal of the earlier agreement which permitted Muslims to offer Friday prayers on government-allocated land in late 2021.

However, the laws do not outright penalise public praying. An analysis in Scroll.in noted legal experts’ opinions on the fact that not only is praying in public not a criminal offence, but that there must be a “specific intent to cause disharmony among groups,” for it to be penalised.

(With PTI inputs)

‘Over 80% Of Staff Are Hindu’: Lucknow’s Lulu Mall After Right-Wing Outfits Protest Over ‘Namaz’

The statement came after a viral video purportedly showed some men offering namaz in the mall. Four of them were arrested on Tuesday.

New Delhi: The management of the newly opened Lulu Mall in Lucknow has issued a statement saying that “over 80%” of its staff are Hindu.

This statement came after a viral video which purportedly showed some Muslims offering namaz in the mall – a day after it was open to the public on July 11 –  led to police action against those who offered prayers.

The Uttar Pradesh police on Tuesday, July 19 arrested four people in this case. According to police officials, they had allegedly offered namaz inside the mall in an “unauthorised” manner. They added that efforts are on to trace four more accused in the case.

Police told news agency PTI that none of the accused are staff of the mall.  All of them are residents of Lucknow, it added.

The Uttar Pradesh Police on July 15 registered a first information report against unknown persons in connection with the matter. They have been booked under IPC Sections 153 A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion), 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), 505 (statements conducing public mischief) and 295A (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings). Although the police have not been able to trace the persons who offered namaz at the mall.

The complaint was filed by the mall management after the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha protested against the Lulu group and its owner, Yusuffali M.A., for allowing visitors to offer namaz in the mall arena, The Wire reported.

Yusuffali is from Kerala, who runs the Abu Dhabi-headquartered Lulu Group, the multinational conglomerate. The UAE-based Lulu Group has operations in 20 countries and an annual turnover of $8 billion.

The management had also clarified that those offering namaz were not employees of the mall but visitors, and said it will ensure that no such incident repeats.

According to the Indian Express, the Lulu Mall management in Lucknow on July 17 issued a statement denying allegations that it was favouring a community. “It is very unfortunate that some people for their own selfish interests are trying to target our institution. Among our employees are local residents, and people from UP and across the country. Of these, over 80% are Hindu, the rest are Muslims, Christians and others. Nobody in our organisation is allowed to conduct any religious activity. The mall administration has lodged an FIR against those who tried to offer prayers and namaz in a public place.”

“Lulu Mall is completely a business establishment, which conducts business without caste and class,” the statement issued in Hindi by Jaykumar Gangadhar, regional director, Lulu India Shopping Mall Pvt Ltd, said.

“The consumer is most important to us. Our establishment does business within the limits prescribed by government rules. Our employees are here not in the name of caste and religion but on the basis of work efficiency and merit,” it said.

Also read: Reviving the Debate on Indian Secularism in the Age of Religious Nationalism

Following Lulu’s statement, former Indian ambassador to the UAE Navdeep Suri tweeted, saying it was “tragic” that the group had to disclose the religion of its staff.

“The Lulu Group founded by M A Yusuff Ali in UAE have invested well over Rs 10,000 cr in India. They source over Rs 3000 crore of fresh produce from India for their hyper markets, create 1000s of jobs. And they have to disclose the religious identity of their staff? Tragic!” he wrote on Twitter.

Akash Goenka, director of Shubham Goldee Masala Ltd and vice chairman of CII, Uttar Pradesh, told the newspaper: “The government is undertaking initiatives because of which international brands are coming to UP and consumer based companies like us are getting showcased. However, incidents like these are shocking. Incidents based on religious things are not welcome in any manner. When industrialisation happens, it does not see religion, it is for everybody.”

Separately, two people were on July 16 arrested after they entered Lulu Mall and started reciting the Hanuman Chalisa. At least 20 members of a right-wing outfit were detained for trying to recite Hanuman Chalisa inside Lulu Mall.

On July 15, police had detained three people for allegedly attempting to recite Sundarkand inside the mall premises.

“The Lulu mall that is carrying out business activities has been turned into a political hotbed. Unnecessary statements are being made by certain people. Demonstrations are being organised to obstruct the movement of the people visiting the mall,” chief minister Yogi Adityanath told administrative and police officers, Hindustan Times reported.

“The Lucknow administration should take the matter seriously. Such disorder will not be tolerated. The miscreants trying to create disturbance in the mall should be dealt with strictly,” he said.

(With PTI inputs)

Published on July 19 at 12:45 pm, this story is being republished on the same date at 4:25 pm with an update on the arrest of four people in this case.

‘No Sufficient Ground to Invoke Sedition Against Ranas’: Court on ‘Hanuman Chalisa’ Case

The Mumbai court, however, said the couple ‘undoubtedly crossed the line of freedom of speech’, while granting them bail.

New Delhi: While maintaining that Maharashtra MP Navneet Rana and her MLA husband Ravi Rana “undoubtedly crossed the line of freedom of speech”, a special court in Mumbai, however, found fault with the police invoking sedition against them in the Hanuman Chalisa case.

The court, in a 17-page detailed order released on Friday, May 6, ruled that mere expression of derogatory or objectionable words is not sufficient ground to invoke sedition in the case. The lawmaker couple walked out of jail on Thursday, a day after getting bail.

Special court judge R.N. Rokade said, “Undoubtedly, the applicants have crossed the lines of freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under the constitution. However, mere expression of derogatory or objectionable words may not be a sufficient ground for invoking the provisions contained in Section 124A [Sedition] of IPC.”

The Ranas were arrested on April 23 after their announcement to chant Hanuman Chalisa outside chief minister Uddhav Thackeray’s private residence, Matoshree, in Mumbai. While the couple had told the court that their intention was only to mobilise public support, the Mumbai Police had said that they had intended to cause public disorder and challenge law and order in the state to an extent that the dissolution of the present government could be recommended.

Referring to Section 124A, the court said a plain reading of the section would show that its application would be attracted when an accused brings or attempts to bring into hatred or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law in India, by words either written or spoken or visible science or representations, etc.

Also read: Hanuman Chalisa Row: Tension Prevails Outside Maharashtra MLA Ravi Rana’s Residence

The court noted that it was well-settled that Section 124A cannot be invoked to penalise criticism of persons for the time being engaged in carrying on administration or strong words used to express disapprobation of the measures of government with a view to their improvement or alteration by lawful means.

Similarly, comments, however strongly-worded, expressing disapprobation of actions of the government, without exciting those feelings which generate the inclination to cause public disorder by acts of violence, would not be penal, the court added.

“It is pertinent to note that on perusal of the FIR, it is not the case of the prosecution that the said announcement (of Hanuman Chalisa recitation) was made with an intention to incite people to create disorder by acts of violence. The said announcements do not in any manner have the tendency of subverting the government by violent means, nor do the same have the effect of creating hatred, disaffection or contempt for the government,” the court said.

On the transcripts of the speech submitted by the prosecution, the court said, “Prima facie, it appears that the applicants have used certain expressions and sentences against the chief minister, which are extremely objectionable.”

However, the court had a word of advice for the lawmaker couple. “It is to be noted here that political leaders play an important role in facilitating peace and tranquility. Their vitality is appreciated due to the fact that they have followers who believe in what they say and act accordingly. Therefore, politicians and other public figures have greater responsibility,” it said.

The court added that it may be noted that neither the applicants called anyone to bear arms nor any violence was incited in general as a result of their speech.

Earlier, opposing the bail plea of the Ranas, the Mumbai Police stated that while on the face of it their plan looked innocent, it was in fact a “big plot” to challenge the state government. The plan was intended to cause a collapse of the law and order situation and then seek for dissolution of the present government by the governor of Maharashtra, it had said.

“When the use of words has the pernicious tendency or intention of creating public disorder or disturbance of law and order then the provisions of sedition are attracted,” the police had said, opposing the bail plea.

The couple walked out of jail on Thursday, May 5, after furnishing Rs 50,000 each as a surety amount.

(With PTI inputs)

MP Navneet Rana, MLA Husband Ravi Rana Granted Bail in Hanuman Chalisa Case

The couple was arrested on April 23 by the Mumbai police following their public declaration of reciting the Hanuman Chalisa outside Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray’s private residence.

Mumbai: A special court here on Wednesday granted bail to Independent MP Navneet Rana and her MLA-husband Ravi Rana, who were arrested following a row over the recitation of Hanuman Chalisa.

The couple was arrested on April 23 by the Mumbai police following their public declaration of reciting the Hanuman Chalisa outside Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray’s private residence ‘Matoshree’ in Bandra area here.

They were booked under various provisions of the IPC, including charges of sedition and promoting enmity.

On Wednesday, special judge R.N. Rokade allowed their bail plea.

The court said the applicants shall not commit a similar offence while on bail, and not address the press on any subject related to the case.

The couple had in their bail plea, filed through advocates Rizwan Merchant and Abad Ponda, claimed that the call to recite the Hanuman Chalisa outside ‘Matoshree’, the chief minister’s private residence, cannot be said to be an act to promote feelings of enmity or hatred and the charge under IPC section 153(A) cannot be sustained.

They also submitted that by no stretch of imagination, can the acts of the applicants be stated to constitute the offence of sedition.

The police, represented by special public prosecutor Pradeep Gharat, had opposed the bail plea, saying while on the face of it the couple’s plan looked innocent, but it was, in fact, a big plot to challenge the ruling government.

The police claimed that the opposition BJP in the state and political opponents of Thackeray were trying to create an atmosphere to show that the chief minister was against Hindus and not sponsoring the cause of Hinduism.

BHU Stands Its Ground Despite Right-Wing Protests About Iftar Event

While a section of students claimed that the university was organising iftar for the first time, officials refuted the claim, saying the practice dates back two decades.

New Delhi: After a section of students claimed that the Banaras Hindu University (BHU) officially organised an iftar event on April 27 and burnt the vice-chancellor’s effigy, varsity officials refuted the claim and slammed the protests as an attempt to disturb the peace and harmony of the campus.

The event was organised at the University’s “Mahila Mahavidyalaya”, according to NDTV. It was attended by Sudhir Jain and other staffers of the varsity and the college.

In protest, some students claimed that this was the first instance of the university hosting an iftar event and recited the “Hanuman Chalisa” outside the vice-chancellor’s house on Wednesday evening.

“Iftar party was officially organised in university for the first time. All expenses were borne by University. We’ll not allow organising iftar parties officially” a student claimed, according to NDTV.

BHU spokesperson Rajesh Singh, however, said that organising iftar was not new and slammed the anti-iftar protest as an attempt to disturb the peace and harmony on the campus.

“Festivals of all religions are celebrated on the campus. The Roza Iftar was organised at the women’s college after a gap of two years and the VC was invited as the head of the university, he said. The iftar was not conducted by the administration, he confirmed.

Even in the past, VCs have participated in similar parties, the spokesperson said. “Attempts to spoil the environment on such issues is condemnable,” Singh said.

In a statement, BHU’s public relations officer said, “Students from all around the world come to BHU and study in an all-inclusive atmosphere in the varsity, where one finds no scope of any form of discrimination on any basis.”

A number of festivals are organised and celebrated in the university with members of the BHU fraternity participating with mutual love, respect and harmony, the statement said. The vice-chancellor attended the iftar organised in Mahila Mahavidyalaya on April 27 at the invitation of students and faculty members of the MMV. Several other senior officials of the university were also present.

Iftar could not be organised for the past two years due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the statement said. “The tradition of organising iftar in BHU dates back to more than two decades. These iftars were
attended by subsequent vice-chancellors over the years in the capacity of head of the BHU fraternity and as per their availability on the campus. Attempts to disturb the peace and academic atmosphere of Banaras Hindu University are unacceptable and condemnable,” the statement said.

In a separate incident, after some “anti-Brahman” slogans and others related to Kashmir surfaced on the BHU’s campus wall.

While varsity officials said the slogans were the handiwork of the Bhagat Singh Chhatra Morcha, the student outfit strongly denied the allegation.

Kapri, the chief proctor, said the members of the Bhagat Singh Chhatra Morcha, whose name was written under the slogans, have been identified by the university administration and action will be taken against them.

The student body, denying its involvement, asked the university to investigate the matter and take strict action against those involved in it.

(With PTI inputs)

On Adityanath’s Orders, UP Removes Nearly 11,000 Loudspeakers From Religious Places

Law enforcement officials have claimed that loudspeakers are being removed “from all religious places without any discrimination.”

New Delhi: The Uttar Pradesh government has claimed to have removed 10,923 loudspeakers from religious places across the state upon chief minister Adityanath’s orders.

Law enforcement officials have referred to these loudspeakers as “unauthorised”, “illegal” and having been placed without due permission from district administration or in excess of permitted numbers.

The volume levels of another 35,221 loudspeakers was set to “permissible limits” following the government order.

“A statewide drive is being undertaken to remove unauthorised loudspeakers from religious places and set the volume of others within permissible limits,” Additional Director General of Police (Law and Order) Prashant Kumar told the news agency PTI.

He added that loudspeakers are being removed “from all religious places without any discrimination.”

The Uttar Pradesh government’s action followed after chief minister Adityanath, during a review meeting on law and order with senior officials last week, said, “Though microphones can be used, it should be ensured that the sound does not come out of any premises. People should not face any problem.”

Uttar Pradesh’s Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Awanish Kumar Awasthi told Indian Express, that the government is now asking district administration to comply with a 2018 order issued by it setting decibel limits.

The home department has also sought a compliance report from the districts over the removal of loudspeakers at religious places by April 30. Norms under the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, have also been asked to be publicised.

To Indian Express, which asked Kumar about the process being followed in enforcing Adityanath’s orders, Kumar said: “The thumb rule is that the noise or the sound should not go beyond the premises. For instance, if a premise has five loudspeakers, upto three loudspeakers may be removed to ensure that the sound is limited to the premises while people are able to undertake their normal religious activities as well.”

Tension in Maharashtra

The Uttar Pradesh government’s decision comes at a time when use of loudspeakers by mosques has been made into a political issue. Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray earlier this month demanded that loudspeakers at mosques in the state be removed by May 3, failing which the Hanuman Chalisa would be played at a higher volume levels outside mosques.

ADG Kumar said orders of the high court regarding loudspeakers are also being considered during the exercise, but did not specify exactly which order.

On May 15, 2020, the Allahabad high court had held that azaan could be recited by a muezzin (an Islamic priest) from minarets of mosques without using any amplifying device or loudspeakers, India Today has reported. From time to time, other high courts have delivered verdicts on the matter. The Supreme Court in 2005 had ruled that loudspeakers could be permitted to be used till midnight on festive occasions for 15 days a year, after having previously imposed a blanket ban on use of loudspeakers between 10 pm and 6 am.

According to the information provided by the police department to PTI on Wednesday, the highest number of loudspeakers, 2,395, were removed from districts of the Lucknow zone. This was followed by Gorakhpur (1,788), Varanasi (1,366) and Meerut (1204) zones.

In terms of minimising the volume levels of loudspeakers, too, the Lucknow zone tops the list with action being taken against 7,397 loudspeakers, followed by Bareilly (6,257) and Meerut (5,976).

The exercise was conducted in the city by a joint team comprising officials of the Lucknow Municipal Corporation and the police.

“The exercise to remove loudspeakers was started on Tuesday and is currently underway. We are conducting the exercise in tandem with members of peace committees and religious heads of different religions. So far, we have not faced any opposition while conducting the drive,” Deputy Commissioner of Police (West) Somen Barma said.

Lucknow-based Sunni cleric Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali and Balrampur’s Shakti Peeth Devipatan temple priest Mithilesh Nath Yogi were among religious leaders who issued appeals endorsing the government move, Indian Express has reported.

(With PTI inputs)

Bombay HC Refuses to Quash FIR Against Ranas in Hanuman Chalisa Row

The court concurred with the Maharashtra government’s view that there would be law and order problems following the lawmaker couple’s public statements on reciting the Hanuman Chalisa at the chief minister’s residence.

Mumbai: The Bombay high court Monday dismissed a writ petition filed by lawmaker couple Navneet Rana and Ravi Rana, both arrested under various charges in connection with the Hanuman Chalisa recital controversy, seeking that one of the two FIRs registered against them under Section 353 of the IPC be quashed.

A bench of Justices P.B. Varale and S.M. Modak said that they found no merit in the plea filed by the Rana couple.

The bench, however, said that if the police decided to arrest the Ranas or to take any other coercive action against them based on the second FIR, it must give them prior notice of 72 hours.

The Khar police in Mumbai had registered two separate FIRs (First Information Reports) against Amravati MP Navneet Rana and her MLA husband Ravi Rana between April 23 and April 24, following their statement that they would recite ‘Hanuman Chalisa’ at Maharashtra chief minister and Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray’s private residence, ‘Matoshree’ in Bandra on Saturday (April 23).

Their call for the chanting of Hanuman Chalisa triggered angry protests by Shiv Sena workers who laid a siege to the resident of the Ranas in the Khar area on Saturday seeking their apology.

Police registered the first FIR against the Ranas at Khar police station around 5:30 PM on April 23 on the charge of promoting enmity between different religions. The police subsequently added the charge of sedition to this FIR.

Also read: Hanuman Chalisa Row: Tension Prevails Outside Maharashtra MLA Ravi Rana’s Residence

On April 24, a second FIR was against the Ranas at around 2 AM under section 353 (Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the second FIR, when the Rana couple was arrested and asked to get in the police vehicle, they argued with the police and “some dhakka-mukki (jostling)” took place.

The Rana couple, currently in judicial custody, approached the high court on Monday morning seeking the quashing of the second FIR through advocate Rizwan Merchant.

Merchant told the HC that all the offences were part of the same event and that two separate FIRs had been registered by the police out of vendetta – so that if granted bail in the first FIR, the Ranas can be arrested in the second FIR.

Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Pradip Gharat argued that both the FIRs were the result of two separate incidents- the first was based on the declaration of the recitation (of Hanuman Chalisa), and the second one was registered when the couple resisted arrest.

The high court said it found merit in the SPP’s submission.

“These are two independent, different events and not part of the same series of events, we find no reason to grant relief,” the HC said.

The bench, however, said that if the police decided to arrest the Ranas or to take any other coercive action against them based on the second FIR, it must give them prior notice of 72 hours.

The bench also said that the Ranas, being public figures, should have acted more responsibly.

“As it is often said, with great power, comes great responsibility,” the HC said.

The bench said the Maharashtra government had been right in apprehending law and order problems following the couple’s public statements on reciting the Hanuman Chalisa at ‘Matoshree’.

“The FIRs show that these are two independent occurrences. The first incident, of the petitioners reaching Mumbai, saying they were going to recite on April 23 gave rise to the first FIR,” the HC said.

“The second incident of resisting arrest gave rise to the second FIR under section 353. The occurrence of both events is at different times. They are independent of each other and not part of the same central event,” it said.

Merchant argued that the Rana couple had been arrested on the mere apprehension that they would recite the Hanuman Chalisa.

“They (police) registered a particular offence only because PM Narendra Modi was visiting the town (on April 24) and they thought there will be a law and order situation. But this programme was cancelled. They eventually publicly decided to drop the idea,” Merchant said referring to the Rana couple withdrawing their plan to recite Hanuman Chalisa on Saturday, a day ahead of the PM’s visit to Mumbai.

“Also, they never said they will recite it ‘at’ ‘Matoshree’. They said ‘outside’ Matoshree,” Merchant argued.

The high court, however, said that cancelling the planned recitation “did not matter”.

SPP Gharat argued that the Ranas were aware that PM Modi was visiting Mumbai on April 24 and that their plan would cause an “explosive situation” as the situation was already tense over the issue of loudspeakers at mosques.

He also said that the police had initially booked the Ranas only on the charge of promoting enmity. But after speaking to witnesses and recording statements, the police realised that the recitation plan was a “cold and calculated move on their (Ranas) part to disturb the state government. Hence, the charge of sedition was added to the first FIR”.

The high court said the state government’s fear seemed justified.

“Such a declaration of the recitation at someone’s personal residence or even at a public place is certainly firstly the breach of the other person’s personal liberty (sic),” the HC said.

“Secondly, the state is justified in its apprehension that such act of reciting religious verse at the CM’s private house would result in disturbance to law and order,” it said.

The bench said the petitioners and all others occupying public positions must act more responsibly and show respect towards other public persons.

“As is often said, with great power comes great responsibly,” the HC observed.

“We made similar comments just two days back,” the high court said while referring to a hearing last week on Union minister Narayan Rane’s “slap” remark against Uddhav Thackeray.

“But we are pained to say that our words fell on deaf ears. We realized that we cannot expect anything even from those occupying respectable posts ” the judges said and dismissed the plea of the Ranas, saying that it was devoid of merits.

“The second FIR pertains to a different set of events. These aren’t a sequel to the first set of events. These are two independent, different events and not part of the same series of events, we find no reason to grant relief,” the bench said.

‘Hanuman Chalisa’ Row: Rana Couple Sent to Judicial Custody; Sena Workers Held For Protests

Thirteen Shiv Sena workers were arrested for allegedly protesting outside the Khar residence of the MP and MLA couple.

Mumbai: A Mumbai court on Sunday, April 24, remanded independent MP Navneet Rana and her MLA husband Ravi Rana in 14-day judicial custody, a day after they were arrested in connection with their announcement to recite Hanuman Chalisa outside Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray’s residence here.

The court sent the politician couple in judicial remand, rejecting the city police’s demand for their custody, an official said.

While Navneet Rana will be sent to the Byculla women’s jail, her husband will be taken to the Arthur Road jail, the official said.

Meanwhile, 13 Shiv Sena workers were arrested on Sunday for allegedly protesting outside the Khar residence of the Ranas the previous day. The party workers were later released on bail, police said.

The police also registered an FIR against an unidentified person for allegedly hurling stones at the car of former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Kirit Somaiya near Khar police station on Saturday night, when he had gone to meet the Ranas following their arrest.

Shiv Sena supporters, who had gathered outside the police station, protested against Somaiya’s visit and shouted slogans. While he was leaving the police station in an SUV, some protesters hurled footwear and water bottles at his vehicle.

The city police had on Saturday evening arrested Badnera MLA Ravi Rana and his wife Navneet Rana, the MP from Amravati in Maharashtra, for allegedly “creating enmity between different groups.”

The development came hours after the couple cancelled their plan to recite the Hanuman Chalisa outside Uddhav Thackeray’s private residence ‘Matoshree’ here.

The Ranas were booked under Sections 153 (A) (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony) and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) , and Section 135 of the Mumbai Police Act (violation of prohibitory orders of police), officials earlier said.

Both of them were on Sunday produced before a court in Bandra which sent them to judicial custody for 14 days, public prosecutor Pradip Gharat said.

“Charges under IPC Section 124-A (sedition) are made out against them as they had challenged the government machinery and made remarks against Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray”, the prosecutor said.

The court will hear their bail application on April 29, he added.

Also Read: Hanuman Chalisa Row: Tension Prevails Outside Maharashtra MLA Ravi Rana’s Residence

Shiv Sena’s chief spokesperson Sanjay Raut defended the arrest of the Ranas, saying there must have been some reason behind the police action.

On the arrest of 13 Shiv Sena workers, a police official said, “They were held for allegedly creating ruckus outside the residence of Ranas in suburban Khar. All the arrested persons are accused of playing a key role in the protest on Saturday. Search is on for other protesters.”

The Rana couple had lodged a complaint against Sena workers after which a case of unlawful assembly and rioting was filed. “Police are going thorough evidences like media clips, WhatsApp videos to identify the protesters”, he said.

All 13 Sena workers were released on bail as sections applied on them are bailable, he added.

Meanwhile, talking about the alleged attack on him, Somaiya claimed that it was “sponsored by the Uddhav Thackeray government.”

Shiv Sena supporters, who had gathered outside Khar police station, protested against Somaiya’s visit and shouted slogans. While the BJP leader was leaving the police station in the SUV, a group of protesters hurled footwear and water bottles at his vehicle.

Somaiya then travelled to the Bandra police station to file a complaint against Sena supporters.

Talking about the incident, Sanjay Raut said “some traitors do get pelted with stones.”

Senior BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis said they will complain to Union home secretary against the Mumbai police’s “failure” to protect Somaiya, who has ‘Z’ category security.

He also claimed that people of Maharashtra feel there should be President’s rule in the state, but the BJP is not going to demand it.

The current performance of Mumbai police is highly embarrassing, Fadnavis claimed.

Meanwhile, Mumbai police also registered an FIR against the driver of Somaiya for allegedly driving the car in rash and negligent manner, due to which a Shiv Sena corporator and a party worker suffered minor injuries. The incident had occurred when Somaiya was returning after meeting the Rana couple at Khar police station on Saturday, an official said

(PTI)