New Delhi: Sandipsinh Zala, chief officer (CO) of Gujarat’s Morbi municipality where a bridge collapse on October 30 took the lives of 135 people, was questioned by the police for four hours on Wednesday, November 3.
P.A. Zala, deputy superintendent of police (DSP) and the investigating officer in the case, summoned the CO and questioned him about documentation related to the bridge and the contracts awarded for its maintenance and repairs.
Meanwhile, according to a report in the Indian Express, sources close to the investigation claimed that the father-son duo of Prakashbhai Laljibhai Parmar and Devangbhai Prakashbhai Parmar – owners of Dev Prakash Fabrication Limited, the company contracted by Oreva to conduct the repair work – failed to undertake any “scientific assessment of structural stability” of the bridge.
The collapse of a colonial-era suspension bridge on the Machchhu river in Morbi claimed the lives of 135 people on October 30. Additionally, 170 people were rescued from the river after the collapse.
The bridge had been closed for repairs in March this year after the municipal authority entered into a 15-year contract with Ajanta Manufacturing Private Limited, a company part of the Oreva Group. After remaining shut for seven months, the bridge was reopened only five days before the incident occurred.
Also read: Morbi Disaster: ‘Unqualified’ Repair Contractors in Jail But State Yet to Probe Who Chose Them
During a hearing in the court of the chief judicial magistrate, public prosecutor H.S. Panchal had said that the contractors were “not qualified” but were still employed to conduct the repair work.
It has come to light that the two managers at Oreva who have been taken into custody – Dipak Parekh and Dinesh Dave – had reportedly been tasked with “supervising” the work of the contractors. However, Parekh handled graphic design and media management and Dave managed the company’s clock division – neither had any technical expertise in the matter.
Further, Panchal told the court that the bridge cables had not been repaired/replaced in the seven-month maintenance period. DSP Zala, too, raised the issue of the cables, claiming that the incident would “never have happened” if the cables had been repaired.
As such, the investigating officer questioned chief officer Zala on the details of the agreement with the Oreva Group company and on how the firm had been given the contract without being qualified.
What’s more, the same company had been given the contract in 2007 as well.
According to a report in NDTV, the municipal authority signed the contract with Oreva without going through the standard bidding process for government contracts.
Raising further questions of the contracts, the Express report cites DSP Zala as saying that the Rs 29 lakh contract with Oreva was only one page long and contained no specifications for the work to be done.
He added that a probe is on to determine how many employees the company has and what work they do.
Charges against the accused
Nine people were arrested in the wake of the incident and charged under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 304 (Culpable homicide not amounting to murder). These individuals included two managers of Oreva, Parekh and Dave; and the owners of the subcontracted company, Prakashbhai and Devangbhai Parmar, all of whom were remanded to police custody until November 5.
The other individuals arrested include a security guard and ticket booking clerks at the bridge, who were remanded to judicial custody.
Now, the police have added charges under IPC Sections 336 and 337 (both of which deal with negligent acts that can endanger the life and safety of others). According to the Express report, public prosecutor Panchal confirmed that the court has allowed these charges to be added, but charges under IPC Section 338 (causing grievous hurt by endangering the life or safety of others) are pending as “medical certificates with respect to fractures” are awaited.
(With PTI inputs)