College Students Asked To Join Tejasvi Surya’s Rally For Attendance: Congress

Former MLA Sowmya Reddy, who is fielded by the Congress from the Bengaluru South seat requested Karnataka chief electoral officer Manoj Kumar Meena on X to take action against Tejasvi Surya.

Bengaluru: A day before Bengaluru South MP Tejasvi Surya filed his nomination for the upcoming Lok Sabha polls on Thursday, April 4, the Karnataka Congress alleged that students of Jain College in Bengaluru were instructed to join the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader’s election rally for “attendance”.

“Greetings members Tomorrow all the members of the student council have to assemble near maiyas hotel Jaynagar at 9:00 AM for Tejasvi Surya rally. You’ll be getting T-Shirt so don’t be late. Everyone has to be there at the reporting time and no excuses will be entertained. You will be getting attendance for this. Thank You!” the Indian Youth Congress (IYC) Karnataka posted the screenshot of a message on X allegedly received by a student studying in Jain College on Whatsapp.

Further, the Congress party underlined whether “Surya’s move” is a violation of the code of conduct. “How correct is Tejasvi Surya’s move who instructed the college students to compulsorily attend the political program?? Is there no action against MP Tejasvi Surya who is oppressing students?? Isn’t this a violation of the code of conduct?”

Former MLA Sowmya Reddy, who is fielded by the Congress from the Bengaluru South seat requested Karnataka chief electoral officer Manoj Kumar Meena on X to take action against Surya.

A post from an anonymous handle alleging to be a student of Jain college mentioned on X that messages were shared on the college Whatsapp group regarding Surya’s rally.

Last month, Thakur College of Science and Commerce located in Mumbai’s Kandivali had received “a notice” from Mumbai University (MU) after the college allegedly forced students to attend Dhruv Goyal’s speech, who is the son of Union minister and BJP’s North Mumbai Lok Sabha candidate, Piyush Goyal. As per a Mid-Day report, the university “instructed colleges not to use such events for political promotion or publicity of any related individuals or parties.”

Notably, this is not the first instance when Surya is embroiled in a controversy. On March 22, the Karnataka high court granted relief to the BJP MP after an FIR was registered against him for allegedly trying to disturb communal harmony by posting certain comments on social media about an incident related to the assault on a shopkeeper at Nagarathpet area, over the issue of playing Hanuman Chalisa.

In February 2023, the ministry of civil aviation had confirmed in the Rajya Sabha that passenger, identified by the Congress as Surya, who had opened the emergency exit door of an Indigo flight from Chennai to Trichy on December 10, 2022, was the only one to have done so during the last five years.

Decoding the Patel-Kshatriya Feud in Gujarat…And Why the Stitches Are Always Raw

Parshottam Rupala’s comments will indisputably spoil the BJP’s lofty ambitions of getting a 5,00,000+ victory margin on all Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat but to say that it would affect the electoral result stupendously would be an exaggeration.

The Patel-Kshatriya rivalry in Gujarat is a socio-cultural phenomenon that encapsulates the caste dynamics, power structure and economics. Economics, of these, is a major aspect.

Senior Union minister and BJP leader Parshottam Rupala’s “anti-Kshatriya” remark has re-ignited the caste fault lines that the Bharatiya Janata Party had successfully swept under the mat for nearly three decades.

In fact, the BJP’s rise to power points to a beautifully syncretic Patel-Kshatriya stitch. The Keshubhai Patel-Shankersinh Vaghela
combo was one such Patel-Kshatriya team that scripted BJP’s first victory in Gujarat in 1995. Of course, it was the over 18% Patel voter base that played a vital role.

Rupala is a Kadva Patel from Saurashtra and he is the BJP’s Lok Sabha candidate from Rajkot. He was nominated in place of sitting MP Mohan Kundaria, also a Kadva Patel. Rupala’s remark on Kshatriya behaviour has festered fresh wounds in the already highly polarised state. But to the benefit of the BJP, since both the parties involved are Hindus, an amicable temporary solution can be expected.

Unlike most BJP Union Ministers, Rupala is an easily accessible person. A school principal-turned-politician, the 70-year-old was one of the first few entrants to the BJP in Gujarat in the eighties. A Union minister in the Modi government handling fisheries, animal husbandry and dairying, Rupala has unwittingly reignited a traditional caste fault line in Gujarat.

On March 2, Rupala, while attending bhajan function in the Dalit community in Rajkot, remarked that while Dalits had remained steadfast and committed, the Rajputs/Kshatriyas entered into what he called was “roti-beti vyavhar” – breaking bread and giving daughters in marriage – with the “vidharmis (heretics).

Parshottam Rupala apologises. Photo: By arrangement

In Gujarat politics, it is often said that a political party cannot accord equal importance to Patels and Kshatriyas both at the same time. This ‘PaKsha’ acronym (taking the first letters of Patel and Kshatriya in Hindi) is important in decoding Gujarat politics.

When Other Backward Class leader Madhavsinh Solanki was the chief minister of Gujarat, he and his party leaders – notably among them Jhinabhai Darji – conceived the ‘KHAM’ theory which saw Kshatriyas, Harijans, Adivasis and Muslims swarm into the Congress fold. Patels, according to late Gujarat political analyst Nagindas Sanghvi felt humiliated especially when Solanki reportedly made a disparaging comment about how their government would reduce Patels to a lower economic strata. “People who buy oil in tins will be reduced to buying oil in small glass medicine bottles,” he is supposed to have said.

Gujarat had several princely kingdoms in pre-Independence India. Out of the 548 odd big states, at least 128 were in Gujarat not counting the numerous small princely states which commanded fewer gun salutes. Bhavnagar state in Kathiawar was the first to agree to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s scheme of integration of princely states to the Indian Union. That was a period when Kshatriyas and Patels (led by Sardar Patel) shared a relationship of absolute trust. Several Maharajahs and their family members even contested the first election of independent India on Congress tickets and won handsomely.

However, the birth of the Swatantra Party in 1959 gradually saw the rich landlords and Kshatriyas in Gujarat gravitating to this party. Capitalism, free markets and the idea of abolition of ‘license raj’ struck a chord with all the big and small 250+ states and jaagirs in Gujarat.

In fact, in Jawaharlal Nehru’s words, Swatantra Party was made up of “the middle ages of lords, castles and zamindars“. Indira Gandhi’s decision of abolition of privy purses in 1971 gave a further temporary impetus to the Swatantra Party in Gujarat with most Kshatriyas and the erstwhile states under them supporting it. The Patels or Paatidars then who became Congress supporters were mostly uneducated tillers and farm labourers.

Interestingly, after the Emergency, and after Indira Gandhi’s final phase of the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act came into existence, most Patels in Gujarat joined the Congress. Their other option was the Jana Sangh, backed by Hindu nationalists whose present iteration is the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Indira Gandhi’s decision of converting land tillers into land owners benefited the Patels in large numbers and they started idolising the Congress. This phase that began in the early seventies concluded after a decade and half following the phenomenal rise of the OBC in Gujarat politics. Madhavsinh Solanki was an OBC Kshatriya.

Kshatriya protests in Gujarat. Photo: By arrangement.

It was only in the mid eighties that Patels or Paatidars started getting disillusioned with the Congress. The Patels of Gujarat did not enjoy any government job reservations. They had started making extraordinary economic progress because of sky rocketing land prices and had become an increasingly united community. Making up 18% of Gujarat’s population – much more than the Kshatriyas – they were also aiming for political power. “We had money, numbers, unity, but no power. This was possible only through politics”, a senior BJP leader and minister in Gujarat told this author.

With the KHAM theory of Congress excluding them openly, their only option was the newly formed BJP. If we take a cursory glance at the list of the first BJP MPs and MLAs from Gujarat, they are mostly Patels. In fact, it was a Patel – A.K. Patel – who won the first BJP Lok Sabha election in 1984. There were only two BJP MPs elected in India then. Patel from Mahesana in Gujarat and Chandupatla Janga Reddy from Hanamkonda, then in Andhra Pradesh.

The BJP was smart enough then. They did not want to let go of the Kshatriyas completely so they had Keshubhai Patel, their electoral face and Shankersinh Vaghela, their organisational face. Both of them, with Vaghela as the Gujarat BJP president, toiled for decades to bring the BJP into limelight. In its first assembly election in 1980 in Gujarat, BJP won nine seats. Out of these five were Patel MLAs – Amritlal Patel, Gangaram Patel, Keshubhai Patel, Nathbhai Patel and Arvindbhai Patel. There was not a single Kshatriya leader elected from the BJP, which used to be called the ‘Bharatiya Patel Party.’

The KHAM theory undoubtedly brought rich dividends to Congress and the party won 149 assembly seats in 1985, their highest tally ever. But it also witnessed the Patel exodus to the BJP. In the late 80s in Gujarat, Keshubhai Patel, Pravin Togadiya and A.K. Patel were big names who attracted Patels in big numbers to the new BJP.

The Patel allure for the  BJP continued till the mid-2016s, when young Patels began a stir demanding job reservation for Patels. Helmed by Hardik Patel, this resulted in the best electoral victory for the Congress in 2017 in 27 years. It got 77 of the 182 assembly seats in Gujarat. However, the BJP was smart and most Patel leaders including chieft Hardik Patel were absorbed by the BJP eventually. This contributed to BJP winning 156 assembly seats in 2022. The Congress tally from 77 in 2017 dropped to 17 in 2022. By 2024, it has further dropped to 13 with an exodus to the BJP. One of these three MLAs happen to be C.J. Chavda, a known real estate businessman and a Kshatriya.

But all the while, majority Kshatriyas nursed the feeling of being neglected by the BJP. Though the BJP did accommodate Kshatriya leaders from across the state, they felt that they were not given adequate importance in the Gujarat ministry. “We only got portfolios like education and health. The BJP has never trusted us with portfolios like finance or home,” says a senior Kshatriya leader associated with the BJP. According to him, while BJP has had five chief ministers ever since they got a majority in 1995 and while three of them have been Patels including Keshubhai Patel, Anandiben Patel and Bhupendra Patel, they have never had a Kshatriya chief minister.

Bhupendra Patel with CR Paatil. Photo: By arrangement.

When questioned as to how the Congress too never had one, the BJP leader said though Madhavsinh was an OBC, he was a Kshatriya and that the Congress supported the Shankarsinh Vaghela government when he was the chief minister. The Congress also made him a Union minister and the State Congress president after he merged his outfit with the Congress. “In case of BJP, we had a five-time MP and a state BJP chief Rajendrasinh Rana who has been continuously snubbed and was never made a Union minister. Worse, he was also dropped as a Lok Sabha candidate”. The only exception to the ‘rule’ of a Kshatriya getting home department in Gujarat was Pradipsinh Jadeja but he too was a Minister for State and did not have an independent charge, the BJP leader said.

Compare this with the Congress and there are innumerable instances of Kshatriyas getting important positions within the party and the government when they were in power or out of power. Digvijaysinh Jhala of Surendranagar district and Daulatsinh Jadeja became cabinet ministers during Congress governments. Harishin Mahida, Amarsinh Vaghela, Shankersinh Vaghela, Manoharsinh Jadeja, Shankersinh Vaghela Kiritsinh Gohil, Bhadrasinh Vaja and several other Kshatriyas got enviable positions within the Congress party governments in Gujarat. To make matters worse for the BJP, the current Gujarat Congress president Shaktisinh Gohil is also a Rajya Sabha MP and a Kshatriya from Saurashtra. He is the only Congress MP from Gujarat. In 2019, BJP bagged all 26 seats in the Lok Sabha elections and it is hoping to repeat this feat.

Shaktisinh Gohil. Photo: By arrangement.

Rupala’s statement in the heat of the Lok Sabha elections has opened up a pandora’s box. We need not dismiss the BJP’s fire-fighting skills. PM Modi is extremely sensitive about his home state Gujarat and his lieutenant Union home minister Amit Shah has already got involved in the issue. This already indicates that it is now beyond the capabilities of the Gujarat state BJP unit to douse the anti-Kshatriya sentiment.

It must be emphasised that Gujarat Kshatriyas are not at all anti-Modi or Shah and their intervention would definitely earn positive results for the BJP.

Rupala’s comments will indisputably spoil the BJP’s lofty ambitions of getting an over 5,00,000 victory margin on all Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat but to say that it would affect the electoral result stupendously would be an exaggeration or to put it crudely, a Congress fantasy. Nevertheless, it must be emphasised that considering the background of the Patel-Kshatriya feud, this widened chasm can be repaired but not restored to its full glory in the near future.

BJP Fails to Pacify Rajput Community Over Union Minister Rupala’s Remark

Rupala had praised the Dalit community for not bowing down to the British when even “kings and royals” had started breaking bread with them and married into their families.

New Delhi: The controversy around Union minister Parshottam Rupala’s remarks on the Rajput community’s relationship with the British refuses to die down with the latest meeting between community leaders and the Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday (April 3) ending without a resolution.

Rupala, who has been named as the BJP candidate from Gujarat’s Rajkot, had praised the Dalit community for not bowing down to the British when even “kings and royals” had started breaking bread with the British and married into their families.

The BJP leader had made the remark while campaigning in Rajkot on March 22. Since then representatives of various Rajput outfits have demanded the withdrawal of his candidature from Rajkot.

Protests emerged across Saurashtra, where more than 100 large and small princely states existed at the time of independence. Members of the Rajput community, who are the decedents of these princely families, met with BJP representatives in Ahmedabad on April 3 to amicably resolve the situation.

However, the community has stuck to its demand of Rupala’s removal.

“They are firm in their demand for removal of Parshottam Rupala as a candidate,” former BJP Minister and Rajput leader Bhupendrasinh Chudasama told the Hindu after the meeting on Wednesday. 

“We will not budge from our position,” a leader from Saurashtra told the paper.

Meanwhile Rupala has apologised twice for his remarks and Gujarat BJP chief C.R. Paatil also apologised on Tuesday, urging the Kshatriya community to forgive Mr. Rupala, the Hindu reported.

Former Gujarat BJP president and prominent Rajput leader Rajendrasinh Rana also broke his silence over Rupala’s remark on Tuesday and said how could he ever think of uttering such words about Rajputs, who have fought and sacrificed against Mughals and others in the past. 

Gujarat BJP has so far ruled out replacing Rupala as a candidate even though it has replaced two candidates in Sabarkantha and Vadodara due to internal protests by the cadres, the Hindu report said.

 

No Need to Discuss, Kachchatheevu Matter Resolved 50 Years Ago: Sri Lanka

‘I also do not think that such issues will arise,’ Sri Lankan foreign minister Ali Sabry said.

New Delhi: Three days after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s criticism of the opposition for supposedly relinquishing Kachchatheevu island, Sri Lanka stated on April 4 that there was “no need” to discuss the matter since it was resolved 50 years ago.

Since March 31, Modi has been repeatedly raising the Kachatheevu island at various campaign events across the country. He has alleged that Kachatheevu was Indian territory which was ceded during the 1974 maritime boundary agreement with Sri Lanka under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, who was also the Congress party president. Modi has further accused the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Tamil Nadu’s ruling party and Congress ally, of having prior knowledge about the negotiation.

In the first official reaction from Colombo, Sri Lankan foreign minister Ali Sabry said, “We are of the view that there is no need to discuss this as this was an issue which was solved 50 years ago. I also do not think that such issues will arise”.

Speaking to Sri Lankan media at an iftar function, he said that there was no controversy over the island. “They are having an internal political debate on who is responsible for this. Other than that, no one is talking about reclaiming Kachchatheevu,” he added.

The BJP has been trying to make inroads in Tamil Nadu ahead of the Lok Sabha election by cornering the DMK over the fishermen issue. 

While Colombo’s reaction has come comparatively late, the Sri Lankan media had been closely following the developments over Katchatheevu. Several Sri Lankan newspapers published editorials that were critical of the Indian prime minister for raking up the matter for electoral gain and cautioned that it would harm goodwill for New Delhi in the island nation.

Why BJP’s Claim it Will Win All 80 Seats in Uttar Pradesh Is Very Far-Fetched

There are several seats where the BJP faces a daunting social arithmetic, while on others it is hanging on by a thread.

New Delhi: After two successful Lok Sabha campaigns in Uttar Pradesh, the Bharatiya Janata Party has set itself a monumental target of winning all 80 seats in the state in the 2024 general election. In his election rallies, chief minister Yogi Adityanath, while seeking votes for the BJP, is asking voters to gift Prime Minister Narendra Modi a “garland” of “80 beads” this time on his way to cross the 400-seat mark in the country.

While nothing is impossible in electoral politics, especially for a party with a maximalist and expansionist tendency such as the BJP, the results in the 2014 and 2019 elections – the party’s best performances ever in the state – indicate that the clarion call of ‘80 mein 80′ may be a far-fetched one. There are several seats where the BJP faces a daunting social arithmetic, while on others it is hanging on by a thread.

In 2014, the BJP hit its highest-ever tally in UP, winning 71 out of 80 seats on its own. Combined with the two seats won by its ally, Apna Dal, the National Democratic Alliance won 73 out of 80 seats, playing a major role in bringing Modi to power at the Centre. Then, in 2019, even when the BJP faced the combined force of the Opposition Mahagathbandhan, the NDA tally only marginally dropped to 64. The Rashtriya Lok Sal scored a zero. The Samajwadi Party won five seats. The Bahujan Samaj Party secured 10 while the Congress got reduced to one.

To beat their previous best of 73, the BJP would have to not only breach traditional bastions of the Opposition parties and sharpen Hindu polarisation, but maybe also need to win over a section of Muslims, as their vote is crucial on several constituencies, especially in the western region.

While it is true that in 2019, the Opposition brought its strongest-possible alliance to the battlefield, five years have passed since. A state election that was held in 2022 indicated that the BJP’s advantage in mass support over its nearest rival had diminished. In the 2022 state assembly election, though the BJP and its allies came to power again, their combined tally reduced from 325 in 2017 to 273. A drop of 52 seats. Given that a Lok Sabha constituency in the state comprises five assembly constituencies, this roughly translates to 10 Lok Sabha seats.

The main Opposition, the Akhilesh Yadav-led Samajwadi Party, lost the 2022 election despite a high-pitched campaign and a rainbow alliance of backward caste parties and leaders. The SP bettered its position from 2017, when it lost power, and increased its tally from 47 to 111. The SP alliance – now dismantled with the exit of the RLD and the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party – won 125 seats in the 403-assembly.

The trends in state elections may not be sufficient to explain or predict the upcoming general election. However, a look at the results in the 80 Lok Sabha constituencies in the last two general elections and last assembly election, show that the BJP does indeed have weaker areas where it might find it difficult to either win or win with a big margin. In addition to the 16 seats the BJP lost in 2019, the party won 14 by margins under 50,000 votes. Another three were won by margins under one lakh. That gives the Opposition a playing field of 30-33 seats where it can potentially challenge the saffron party. It is possible that the Opposition might be able to reverse some of these seats, at least on paper, or put up a serious fight.

In 2014, the BJP won 17 seats with margins under a lakh, with six of them with margins of 50,000 or less.

An analysis of the last two elections – based on BJP losses, close wins, reversible margins or social arithmetic – helps us identify around 30 seats where the Opposition could turn the tides. In the overall scheme, even if the Opposition manages to win 25-30 seats in UP, bringing down the BJP’s tally to below 60, it would be considered a success. Most importantly, it would bust the saffron party’s tall claims of “80 mein 80”.

The first seat is Saharanpur. The BJP won it in 2014 by 65,000 votes due to a divided Opposition but lost in 2019 despite the Congress candidate cutting into more than two lakh Opposition votes. The Congress has fielded Imran Masood again, this time as the joint candidate of INDIA bloc. Saharanpur has a winning formula of Dalits, especially Jatavs, and Muslims, who are expected to consolidate behind Masood. The BJP might also have to struggle to win in other seats with substantial Muslim population in West UP – Rampur and Moradabad – despite the SP’s local units looking like a divided house with several claimants to the ticket turning up to file their nomination recently.

Sambhal and Amroha, too, with above-average Muslim population – one-fifth of UP’s population are Muslims – are seats that the BJP has traditionally struggled to win. The BJP’s only win in Sambhal came in 2014. The Opposition also has a realistic chance in Nagina and Bijnor.

In the sugarcane belt, too, the BJP won some seats in 2019 by narrow margins: Muzaffarnagar (around 6,000), Baghpat (23,000) and Meerut (4,700). It won Kairana, which abuts Muzaffarnagar, by 92,000. It needs to be pointed out that in 2019, the SP had the support of the BSP and more importantly the RLD, in this region. Even with the RLD pulling out of the INDIA bloc and joining NDA, and the BSP contesting alone, the social arithmetic on these seats, especially the possibility of polarising the Muslim votes in favour of the Opposition, make them potential hot contests.

The SP had initially displayed courage and fielded a Dalit lawyer Bhanu Pratap Singh in Meerut, a general seat. But after facing protests over his outsider tag and demands to replace him with Akhilesh-aide and young Gurjar MLA Atul Pradhan, the party made the switch. Pradhan will have a fresh face to challenge – none other than Arun Govil, the actor who is known for playing Lord Ram in the popular television series Ramayana.

The BJP dropped the sitting MP and veteran leader Rajendra Agarwal, who had barely scraped past the finishing line in 2019. Though the BJP won Pilibhit by a huge margin in 2019, the situation could turn complicated this time after it dropped sitting MP Varun Gandhi, who has decided to abstain from the election altogether.

In the last election, the BJP also stunned the SP by breaching its traditional bastions, Firozabad, Kannauj and Budaun by around 29,000, 13,000 and 18,000 votes, respectively.

In Firozabad, the SP’s Akshay Yadav lost after his disgruntled uncle Shivpal Yadav cut into his votes. In Kannauj, Akhilesh Yadav’s wife Dimple Yadav suffered an upset. In Budaun, Dharmendra Yadav too lost in a shock result. Shivpal Yadav is back in the SP-fold and this time, is contesting from Budaun. Dimple is fielded from Mainpuri, a Yadav-clan bastion, after the death of her father-in-law and SP founder Mulayam Singh Yadav.

Away from the Yadav-clan strongholds, in Rae Bareli and Amethi too, the BJP needs to defy traditional equations to win. The BJP failed to win Rae Bareli in both 2014 and 2019. Although in 2019, Smriti Irani defeated Rahul Gandhi in Amethi, she won by a margin of 55,000, which is potentially reversible.

The biggest challenge to the BJP’s dream of 80 seats comes from Purvanchal. In 2019, the saffron party lost the Ambedkar Nagar, Sravasti, Lalganj, Azamgarh, Ghosi, Jaunpur and Ghazipur seats there. In addition to these, the party also won several seats by a thin margin. It won Machhlishahr by a paper-thin margin of 181 votes, Chandauli by 14,000 votes, Ballia by 15,000 votes, Sultanpur by 14,000 votes, Basti by 30,000 votes, Sant Kabir Nagar by 35,000 and Kaushambhi by 38,000 votes.

The prestigious seat of Faizabad, where Ayodhya and the Ram Temple are located, was won by the BJP by 65,000 votes. This time, the SP has fielded a senior Dalit leader, a sitting MLA Awadesh Pradesh, in this constituency even though it is a general seat, in a bid to tap into the support of the Pasi community that is found here in large numbers. The BJP’s lead in Bhadohi (43,000) and Robertsganj (53,000) are also far from irreversible.

The 2022 assembly election provided a wake-up call to the BJP as it failed to open its account or performed below expectation in several districts with high populations of OBCs and Dalits. The party lost all 25 assembly seats in Azamgarh, Ambedkar Nagar, Ghazipur and Kaushambi districts. In Ballia, Mau, Jaunpur, Basti and Pratapgarh, also in eastern UP, the BJP could only win nine out of 32 seats. In the west, too, the BJP found the going difficult in several districts where it had performed remarkably well in previous elections. In Meerut, the party won only three out of seven seats; in Shamli it failed to open its score, losing all three; in the communally-sensitive district Muzaffarnagar, which was rocked by deadly riots in 2013, the party could only manage two out of six seats. Out of the 23 seats in Bijnor, Rampur, Sambhal and Moradabad, the BJP won only eight.

However, the Opposition does not command the same alliance that it did two years ago. The exit of the SBSP in East UP and the RLD in West UP have hurt the cause of the INDIA bloc. It already faced the daunting task of taking on a BJP riding on the face of Modi as well as its allies, Nishad Party and the Apna Dal (Soneylal). Akhilesh Yadav’s social arithmetic of uniting OBCs under his leadership also disintegrated with the exit of the SBSP and the RLD. Now, with his lone alliance partner Apna Dal (Kameravadi) also forming an alliance with the AIMIM of Asaduddin Owaisi, it is the SP and Congress versus the rest.

With Mayawati deciding to field Muslim candidates on several seats and hoping to play spoiler to benefit the incumbent BJP, the Opposition’s task of uniting non-BJP votes faces an additional hurdle. Moreover, the recent defections of more than half-a-dozen SP MLAs, most of them “upper caste”, have altered local equations in Amethi, Rae Bareli, Faizabad, Ambedkar Nagar and Kaushambi Lok Sabha seats. How serious a challenge the Opposition can pose to the BJP may be clear once all candidates are declared. But the slogan of “80 mein 80” seems nothing more than psychological warfare to deflate the Opposition even before the battle begins.

The Battle for 2024 Is Between Modi and His Corporate Backers, and the People of India

In the next few weeks, voters will be called upon to choose between two macro-impulses. One impulse promises stability, decisiveness and ‘vikas’ undergirded by corporate loot, the other banks on sensitivity and empathy for the vast majority and its unfulfilled aspirations for a better hand in life.

Barely 48 hours have passed since the announcement of the Lok Sabha poll schedule but the line-up in the grand battle is already distinctly discernible. For the first time since 1952, when independent India held its inaugural general election, the electorate is being invited to choose between the most vested of vested interests on the one side and the nation’s well-being and public good on the other.

Consider, simply, the headlines this Monday morning.

On March 18, the Business Standard, that respected voice of the capitalist establishment, chose to publish  a “CEO Poll.”  As per its survey, India’s captains of industry unanimously believe that the disquieting disclosure of the identity of donors and recipients of the electoral bonds will not sway voters at all. Translated in simple language: it will have no negative impact on the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP’s) presumed front-runner position.

Implicit in this judgment is the view that despite the suggestions of a quid pro quo, the voter is not going to go all moralistic on the BJP and its allies. The bottom line in this corporate assessment – or hope – is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has used his popularity and trustworthiness to firewall the regime from the fallout that details of a nexus between corrupt business and crooked politicians is likely to generate.

It is therefore no surprise that when asked “How would you rate the past five years in terms of governance and development ?” the CEOs were overwhelmingly approving of the Modi regime. Never before have the captains of the industry felt so secure and comfortable in openly displaying their prejudices, political preferences and indifference to morality.

If there was any doubt about the jugalbandi between crony capitalism and the Modi regime, it stood dispelled by the front page advertisement in the Indian Express today, with the familiar visage of Prime Minister Modi staring down at reader. The advertisement promotes a corporate event – “Rising Bharat” summit – being organised by News 18, a channel owned by the Ambani group. The prime minister heads the speakers’ list, with other senior ministers lending their two bits’ of presence. The reader is served up various catchphrases – innovation, climate action, inclusion and empowerment, world peace, governance – to inspire her but there is not a single voice or face from the non-BJP corner. At least the country’s biggest industrial house has made its preference known loud and clear.

While any so-called “entrepreneur” is entitled to show his cards, what should we make of the curiously innocuous view the Rashtriya Swayamsevak is taking on the electoral bond disclosures? According to RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale, the use of anonymous bonds as an instrument for political financing was just an “experiment” and that “questions are raised when a new thing comes up”. Confronted with the sordid details which have emerged so far, the tone of compromise from the Hindutva quarter is loud and clear.

Here is an organisation which for the past 78 years has been arrogating to itself the right to be the sole guardian of moral standards and ethical values in our political system. Confronted now with damning evidence of the indefensible nexus with business at the core of the Modi regime, the saffron commissars are at a loss for words.

Not to leave any doubt about the line-up which has emerged behind the BJP for the Lok Sabha elections, consider today’s reports of a mob in Ahmedabad targeting foreign students for offering namaz at Gujarat University. Expectedly, the Ministry of External Affairs has rushed in with its own damage-control statement, telling the global community of some arrests made. But the foreign service officers are in no position to control the larger eco-system of hatred and bigotry that makes a Hindutva mob feel entitled to engage in violent moral policing.

For sure, the Ahmedabad mob must have felt emboldened in its lawlessness by the sudden resurrection of the Citizenship (Amendment) on the eve of the Lok Sabha polls – a decision taken at the highest level of the Modi regime. It was a clear signal to lumpens all over the country to feel free to practice their craft.

The Ahmedabad violence underscores a challenge the BJP/RSS corner will face, having unleashed ugly and raw impulses in the majority community. The resulting polarisation helps the party electorally but the spectre of mobs on the rampage could curdle the Modi regime’s promise of order and stability. The middle classes – core supporters of the Shahenshah and Shah regime – would be mortified at lawless crowds taking over our streets and cities.

Arrayed against this phalanx of greed and bigotry is the somewhat incoherent song of ‘mohabbat’, or love, being sung by Rahul Gandhi and the rest of the opposition. The non-NDA parties, in their own idiom and language, are putting together, however inadequate this may seem, a counter-narrative of harmony and inclusiveness. On the last day of his second Bharat Jodo Yatra, Rahul Gandhi tried to project himself as the ‘outsider’ who was not at all enamoured of the ‘system’.

After 10 years in office, Prime Minister Modi today represents the worst habits of the old, rotten system. He may think of himself as an incorruptible deshbhakt, a nationalist leader of men, but as Rahul Gandhi noted in his speech at Dharavi in Mumbai, the prime minister is simply a ‘mukhota’, a mask, kept in good humour by the billionaires’ loot-and-greed axis. The violence-prone lumpens provide cost-effective ‘jan shakti’ to the unethical and immoral practices.

In the next few weeks, voters will be called upon to choose between two macro-impulses. One impulse promises stability, decisiveness and ‘vikas’ undergirded by corporate loot, the other banks on sensitivity and empathy for the vast majority and its unfulfilled aspirations for a better hand in life. The Opposition’s narrative carries with it the risk of incoherence and fragmentation; whereas Modi promises a familiar authoritarian solution.

The Opposition will need to reassure the electorate that effective governance is feasible and possible even in a collective coalition arrangement. The Opposition leaders, individually as well as collectively, will need to understand that in the end, the final battle is between Narendra Modi and his corporate backers and bankers, and the people of India. Even if the Opposition leaders remain unequal to the task of tapping into the voters’ anxieties and fears, the electorate in its innate wisdom will see to it that the Republic recovers its lost equilibrium.