Interview | TMC List Was Not Made by Mamata, Doubt if She Was Even Consulted: Dinesh Trivedi

In conversation with former TMC and now BJP leader Dinesh Trivedi about how liberal Hinduism is at the BJP’s core, the apparent politics of appeasement in Bengal and why the state needs synergy with the Centre.

Kolkata: The searing heat of election season overshadows the lazy resplendence of spring on the streets of south Kolkata as Dinesh Trivedi sits in the drawing room of his sprawling eighth floor apartment scribbling something on a piece of paper. In front of him, a mobile phone plays out Mamata Banerjee’s speech at a Nandigram rally. She paces up and down the stage and is rattling off Hindu mantras one after another like a woman in a divine frenzy.

On the paper, Trivedi makes a list. Agriculture tops. Then comes tourism, healthcare, education, IT and ITES opportunities, and manufacturing and MSMEs. “I don’t know whether the party will ever ask for it. But I have to be prepared. These are areas I feel one should work on. Bengal has vast opportunities in these fields but hardly any planning or infrastructure,” he says, looking at the hazy Kolkata skyline across the large glass panes.

No, he doesn’t blink or twitch an eyebrow while uttering the word ‘the party’. For so long, ‘the party’ for him has been the Trinamool Congress of which he was the founding general secretary. Twenty-one years, five stints in the parliament and a series of acrimony and accusations later, he is now a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) functionary.

“Look, how she is unnerved. Why does she need to prove that she is a Hindu? If you are making an effort to prove something like your religion, you are already making a statement to the contrary,” he says, switching off the video.

Also read: What’s Determining the BJP’s Prospects in West Bengal?

Hindutva and Hinduism

It’s no surprise that the H-word makes an early entry in the chat. Trivedi talks at length about how liberal Hinduism is at its core. Many years ago, while working in Chicago, Trivedi had gone to the R.K. Mission branch in that city to join the monastic order. “Swami Bhasyananda, the monk-in-charge, asked me to serve people by being in public life. Later, I became a disciple of Swami Chinmayanand, who was instrumental in the foundation of the Viswa Hindu Parishad. So my association with them is nothing new,” says Trivedi.

“If you interact with RSS people, Mohan Bhagwat ji for example, you see how simple yet profound their lifestyles are. Even as a Trinamool MP, I have kept in touch with them. People who criticise them do so on the basis of some half-baked knowledge.”

How does incidents like Dadri lynching or the vilification of Tablighi Jamaat fit into his ideas about Hinduism? Trivedi says these are stray incidents — often law and order issues — which should be dealt with as that. “These incidents are not happening in every nook and corner of the country. Hinduism believes in inclusion. There is no scope for imposing anything on anybody. A Hindu cannot be intolerant,” he asserts. What about beef ban, then? Trivedi says, “In democracy, you have to respect the choice of the majority. That is how democracy works. If 80 people in this building decide you can eat only vegetarian food, the rest 20 will have to oblige.”

Representative image. Credit: Reuters/Cathal McNaughton

“And whatever is happening today is a reaction. You have to see it as an antidote to Congress’s policy of  using minority religious sentiments in its favour in the 70s and 80s. On the eve of  elections, the Congress party would go to an Imam, who would give a fatwa that Muslims should vote for the Congress. This is not secularism either,” he says.

Trivedi strongly asserts that he sees nothing wrong in the prime minister taking part in the foundation stone laying of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya or performing rituals at the site of the new parliament building, because “this is a country where we are proud to be Hindus and he is endorsing the majority’s religious sentiments.”

Also read: How Secular Is the Secularism of the Secular Parties?

‘Mamata lost control of the party; it’s over to the consultant’

Trivedi says it is not his job to defend every action or every policy of the BJP. “I am a politician from Bengal and my first priority is to set my own house in order. It is with that intention that we started the party. But this is not the same Mamata who had inspired me two decades back with her grit and courage. The party that you see today has gone beyond her control. It is totally run by the consultant. I don’t even take his name.” No points for guessing, he means Prashant Kishore.

“I have known Mamata for decades. She has an encyclopaedic memory. When she was announcing the candidates, she could not answer the journalists without consulting the list, it struck me as impossible. I can guarantee, the list was prepared by the consultant and given to her. I doubt whether Mamata was even consulted,” Trivedi says.

“However, I have a feeling that Mamata does not like the consultant. It is the idea of the second-in-command and she cannot help it. The way the power centre of the party has shifted is not acceptable. And that has already cost the Trinamool dearly.”

West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee addresses a rally at Rashmela Ground in Cooch Behar district, December 16, 2020. Photo: PTI

“Some of the decisions have been shocking. Dumping Sonali Guha for example. No leader in the party was closer to Mamata than Sonali. If Mamata asked her to chop off her head, she would do that without batting an eyelid. And to go with it, her track record at Satgachia. When you drop a person like that, it shows that you have lost connection with the ground reality. It is a decision taken by the new leadership,” Trivedi says.

Also read: Laughter, Tears and Flared Tempers: Reactions to the TMC Candidate List

“The whole party is being run by the consultant. I don’t have an iota of doubt that he decided who’s going to stand from where. Sonali did not break down because she was not given a ticket. I know them too well. She broke down because this is not the treatment she deserved. She came to know from TV that the consultant had decided she was not good enough. Same with the respected Mastermoshai (Rabindranath Bhattacharya) from Singur.”

“Mamata keeps saying that hers is a poor man’s party. And I hear that the consultant is being paid in hundreds of crores. It is public money. When she fought the might of the CPM, the party had no consultant and no money. What it had was the power of the people. Today it has money, but it does not have the power of the people,” he says.

‘Felt helpless in a party corrupt to the very core’

Trivedi says the first major jolt that he faced was back in December, 2020. “A young woman from Bhatpara, whose late father was known to me, came to me with her problems. She was trying to start a small commercial project but had ran into Trinamool-backed extortionists.”

“I called up the principal home secretary of the government of West Bengal and put the lady in touch with him. He sent her to the anti-rowdy squad (ARS) of police. When she went to the ARS, there again the question of cut-money came in. The officer told her there was no point going to higher authorities because everyone had their share. She sent me a message on December 11 saying she was giving up.”

“My blood boiled. At the same time I felt so helpless. Here I was, the founder member of the ruling party and enjoying all the perks of being an MP, but I could not do anything to help a woman trying to start a new venture. Even the top bureaucrats were helpless in the face of corrupt local leaders. I called up the home secretary, but I feared if I gave him the details, and the information got out, the lady would be murdered,” Trivedi says. He looks exasperated.

“People are angry because the party is corrupt to its very core. Even at the time of the Narada sting, I became the bad guy inside the party because I said that whoever has taken the money should own up that yes, we took the money for election. Our fault is that we did not inform the EC or the I-T department,” he adds.

“What did Mamata do? She banned me from campaigning in 2016 because I told the truth! And today, the party is hijacked by lust for power and money. Mamata, I believe, knows everything but it has gone beyond her control.”

Culture of abuse and backbiting

Trivedi says the party wanted him to abuse the prime minister and the home minister all the time, which he saw was pointless and uncalled for. “It is not in me to abuse anybody. But every time I rose to speak in the parliament, the party would want me to abuse the senior leaders of the country.”

“When J.P. Nadda’s car was attacked in Bengal, I condemned it on a television channel. The party saw it as an offence. A senior Rajya Sabha leader sent messages to everyone saying Dinesh da is not obeying the party,” Trivedi says.

“Bratya Basu called me up to know what was what. I asked him, do we celebrate violence or condemn it? If I condemn violence on another party leader it puts the TMC on a high moral ground.”

“When I spoke against the privatisation of Air India, I began by thanking the aviation minister for ferrying so many ordinary citizens back to the country during COVID times. Again, the same sent a cropped clipping of only those first few seconds to Mamata. As if to say, this is how Dinesh da is warming up to the BJP. And Mamata sent it back to me seeking an explanation. I felt so insulted that day. This was the second jolt. Couldn’t Mamata trust me? I am one of the oldest leaders of the party!” Trivedi asks. “And this leader was nowhere in politics when we were struggling to form a new party,” he adds.

“I had not planned my resignation the day I took the call. I attended the morning session, I had Question No 3 on Railways. I asked the question, came home for my shower and my puja, went back, and then it happened all of a sudden. It was building up inside me, but I had not planned it. But I had no doubt in my mind that I was doing the right thing,” he adds.

Also read: How the BJP Keeps Its Opponents Fragmented With Its ‘Carpet Bombing’ Strategies

‘Mamata no longer represents Bengal’s culture’

“The politics of appeasement has to stop in Bengal. The law of the land has to be the same for everyone. This is something the prime minister also pointed out in his Brigade speech. This is what the BJP promises,” he says.

“If there is any party which can bring back the glory of Bengal, it’s the BJP. There is no other party in the horizon. And I am honoured that the party president himself was present to induct me. At the moment, there are only two parties which do not serve a family, they serve the country: the Left and the BJP.”

Did it take him 30 years of public life to realise this? Trivedi says it’s a process. “Everything in life is about a process or an opportunity at the right time. And the platform of the BJP that we have today, was not there yesterday, in terms of their political presence. At the same time, the Trinamool was not a family oriented party in its heyday,” he says.

On November 27, 2020, 44 days prior to resigning from the TMC, Trivedi re-tweeted Abhishek Banerjee’s tweet saying the prime minister must take governance lessons from Mamata. Asked about if he still believes so, Trivedi makes a bewildering claim. “It was not me. It was somebody else who tweeted it from my account. We were made to share our Twitter handles with the IPAC team. They tweeted on behalf of us,” he says.

“At times they would tweet in Hindi. And I never do that. As soon as I resigned on February 12, I found that my Twitter account was disabled,” he adds.

“The people of Bengal are not appreciating the chief minister’s antics. Her body language is so full of violence. She no longer represents the culture of Bengal. Look at our former chief ministers. They represented the Bengali bhodrolok (gentry). Look at Mamata’s language and gestures. There are better things to talk about in politics,” he says.

‘Bengal needs synergy with the Centre’

“Bengal has so much potential. But there is no infrastructure, from agriculture to tourism to education, everywhere. You go to any good institution anywhere in the world, you will see Bengalis working there. Why can’t we stop this brain drain? Why can’t we have a micro-processor hub in Bengal?” Trivedi asks.

“Bengal needs industry. Bengal needs infrastructure. And Bengal needs some kind of synergy between the state and the Centre. I would be happy if I can play a small role to strengthen that coordination or synergy,” he says.

“But sadly nobody in the present ruling party is bothered with all these. If there is at all any concept of an outsider, it is this person who has hijacked the party. And on behalf of all the disgruntled leaders I can say, it is not us that have left the party. It is the party that has left itself. It is no longer that value-based party that we had started.”

As evening sets in across the Kolkata skyline, Trivedi utters these words with as much nostalgia as disgust. He is confident that he has taken a step in the right direction. But he cringes because he has just spoken against his former colleagues. Trivedi says he’s never comfortable doing that, and Trivedi is an honourable man.

‘Suffocated,’ Trinamool Congress MP Dinesh Trivedi Resigns From Rajya Sabha, Party

Rumours are alive that the one-time Union railway minister may join Bharatiya Janata Party tonight. 

New Delhi: The Rajya Sabha saw dramatic scenes on Friday, February 12, when Trinamool Congress MP Dinesh Trivedi announced his resignation after getting up to speak. Trivedi said he was suffocated in the House as he has not been able to do anything for the violence going on in West Bengal.

Trivedi has also quit Trinamool Congress and rumours are alive that he may join Bharatiya Janata Party tonight.

Trivedi has been Union railway minister and was removed from the position after his predecessor and party chief Mamata Banerjee protested against his raising train fares.

On Friday, Trivedi said, “Everywhere in my state I am seeing incidents of violence. Yet we are unable to say anything. I come from the land of Rabindranath [Tagore] and Netaji [Subhash Chandra Bose]. Which is why I cannot tolerate this any longer. I belong to a party and have to abide by that party’s rules. But I am suffocated here. It is better to quit and work in Bengal,” he said, according to a Bengali transcript published by Anandabazar Patrika.

Trivedi added that he had only responded to his inner voice – something that everyone must do once in a while.

“I am grateful to my party that it has sent me here, but now I feel a little suffocated. We are unable to do anything and there is atrocity (going on). My voice of conscience is saying what Swami Vivekananda used to say – arise, awake and stop not till the goal is reached,” Trivedi said, while announcing his resignation from the House.

Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh said there is a due process for resigning from the House and asked Trivedi to submit his resignation in writing to the chairman.

Months Before Bengal Civic Body Polls, TMC Takes Control of 6 Municipalities

Here’s why a TMC chairman in Bhatpara is significant.

Kolkata: Trinamool Congress on Tuesday took control of Bhatpara municipality in West Bengal and elected Arun Bandhopadhay as its chairman.

This is significant because the municipality was the first civic body in the state to come under the control of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The civic body, which comes under the Barrackpore parliamentary constituency, came under saffron rule 12 days after 2019 Lok Sabha elections results were announced.

New chairman Arun Bandhopadhay said, “These are challenging times, but we are here for the development of the people and will work towards that. People of Bhatpara is tired of violence unleashed by the BJP since March 23. People want peace and our party will ensure that.”

BJP’s victory in the Lok Sabha polls had led to clashes in various locations.

The violence was centred around Bhatpara in the North 24 Parganas district, where at least 10 people died, and more than a dozen were injured, including policemen.

Days after the Lok Sabha election results were declared, hundreds of councillors, also known corporators, from various municipalities joined the BJP. About five TMC MLAs and one CPI(M) MLA also joined the saffron party.

The BJP won the majority and took control of municipalities of Nahihati, Kanchrapara, Halisahar, Garulia, Bhatpara, and Bongaon. By taking control over Bhatpara, TMC has regained its majority and formed the board in all the five municipalities.Speaking to The Wire, TMC MLA from Panihati, Nirmal Ghosh, who is also the party in-charge of Barrackpore Lok Sabha seat, said, “After successfully proving majority, we elected the chairman of the municipality today.”

Ghosh further said that after the defeat of Dinesh Trivedi from the Barrackpore LS seat, BJP’s Arjun Singh had “unleashed violence in the area.”

“Our party went door-to-door and spoke to people of Bhatpara and brought back normalcy in the area. Today, BJP lost all grounds in Barrackpore.”

Arjun Singh had been the chairman of Bhatpara municipality, but after winning the Barrackpore Lok Sabha seat, he vacated and made his nephew Sourav Singh the chairman.

Speaking to The Wire, the BJP MP from Barrackpore said “We (BJP) can prove majority. But before the voting date, TMC got an order from the division bench of Calcutta high court and formed the board. We will appeal against this to the Supreme Court.”

Karthik Mondal, a TMC councillor from Bongaon Municipality, who had defected to BJP and later rejoined TMC said, “Some leaders created an environment that forced us to join BJP. Within months’ time, we understood our mistakes and returned to TMC.” Mondal was one of the hundreds who joined the saffron party at its Delhi headquarter.

Also read: As BJP and Trinamool Fight It Out, Who Will Save Bengal from Political Violence?

Later, Mondal along with Abhijit Kaupria, Himadri Mondal, Dilip Muzumder and Shampa Mahato returned to the TMC fold.

In November last year, TMC sprung back to life with victories in all three assembly constituencies that went to by-polls in West Bengal. The victory was significant as TMC won Kharagpur (Urban) seat. BJP Bengal chief Dilip Ghosh was the MLA from Kharagpur (Urban), who vacated after winning the Kharagpur parliamentary seat.

With only a few months left for the civic polls in West Bengal, poll strategist Prashant Kishor held a meeting with several political leaders of TMC to chalk out a plan for the election. Last month, he met councillors of Kolkata Corporation which was attended by the TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee.

A senior executive from Kishor’s firm, Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC) told The Wire on condition of anonymity: “TMC leaders were asked to increase the visibility on the ground. They were asked to organise small meetings in their area. A new campaign is likely to come up for the civic body election, for which initial discussions are on.”

Himadri Ghosh is a Kolkata-based journalist.

Delegation of Opposition Leaders Sent Back from Srinagar

The aim of the delegation had been to take stock of the situation in the state, where restrictions have been in place since the first week of August.

New Delhi: A delegation of opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, Sitaram Yechury, D. Raja, and Sharad Yadav, who attempted visiting Jammu and Kashmir on August 24, was sent back upon reaching Srinagar. 

The aim of the delegation had been to take stock of the situation in the state, which has practically remained under a communication shutdown, following the Union government’s move to bifurcate the state into two union territories and dilute Article 370 a fortnight ago.  

The 12-member team caught a flight on Saturday at around noon from New Delhi and reached Srinagar just before 2:30 pm. 

The delegation comprised of:

Former Congress president Rahul Gandhi and senior party leaders Ghulam Nabi Azad, K.C. Venugopal, and Anand Sharma

Communist Party of India general secretary D. Raja

Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Sitaram Yechury

Trinamool Congress leader Dinesh Trivedi

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam’s Tiruchi Siva

Rashtriya Janata Dal’s Manoj Kumar Jha

Loktantrik Janata Dal president Sharad Yadav

Nationalist Congress Party’s Majeed Memon

Janata Dal (Secular)’s D. Kupendra Reddy

After they were refused permission to visit the region, which has been under lockdown for almost 20 days, the leaders issued a statement to the Budgam district magistrate. They said the objection to their movement and apprehensions about their visit were “baseless”. “They are tantamount to allegations against the purpose of our visit,” they said.

The statement issued by the leaders. Photo: Special arrangement

The leaders said they had arrived at the invitation of J&K governor Satya Pal Malik. ON August 12, Malik said hit out at Rahul Gandhi for remarks that there were reports of violence in Kashmir. The governor said he would “send him an aircraft to visit the valley and observe the ground situation”. Gandhi accepted the invitation and said he would visit along with a delegation of opposition leaders.

However, Malik backtracked and accused Gandhi of trying to “politicise the issue”. In a statement, the office of the governor said, “Rahul Gandhi is politicising the matter by seeking to bring a delegation of Opposition leaders to create further unrest and problems for the common people. As he has put forth many conditions for J&K, the Governor is referring the case to the local police and administration to examine the request further.”

Previous developments

On Friday, the opposition staged its first combined protest against the government for stripping Jammu and Kashmir of its special constitutional status. It had decided to send a team to Srinagar to assess the situation in Kashmir soon after this.

This is the first concerted effort by the combined opposition to register its protest outside the halls of the Parliament against what it called a “unilateral and unconstitutional” decision of the government to bifurcate the state and read down Article 370. 

Earlier, many leaders including Yechury, Raja, Azad had tried visiting the Valley separately but were forced to return from the airports after being denied entry.

The parties later issued statements to condemn the government’s “high-handed” moves to deny senior political leaders entry in Jammu and Kashmir. 

Also read: Is the BJP Fuelling Kashmiri Separatism for Electoral Gains?

Earlier this week, DMK became the first regional party to agitate at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar against continued detention of all political leaders in Kashmir. The Dravidian party demanded immediate release of all mainstream political leaders, who have been under arrest for over two weeks. 

The government has been claiming that it has eased the curfew conditions and has been making efforts to restore normalcy in the state. Last Monday, schools were reopened and shops were allowed to function. But the government has not yet hinted at even a minor reduction of military troops, which almost tripled in the days preceding its announcement of reading down Article 370. Political activists and social workers are still under detention and there are reports of security forces violently clamping down on all forms of protests.  

Soon after the opposition announced the decision to visit the state, the Jammu And Kashmir information and public relations department tweeted to say that political leaders should “not visit Srinagar as they would be putting other people to inconvenience” at a “time when the government is trying to protect the people of Jammu and Kashmir from the threat of cross border terrorism and attacks…”

However, Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad expressed surprise at the tweets and said that the delegation comprised “responsible” senior leaders who had no intention to break any law.

“We are all responsible political parties and leaders. We are not going to break any law. The Jammu and Kashmir situation is very concerning. It’s close to 20 days. No news for 20 days. The government says the situation is normal. But then they don’t allow leaders to go? Haven’t seen such contradiction… If it’s normal, why aren’t we allowed?” Mr Azad said as he left for the airport this morning in Delhi, news agency ANI reported.

Senior leader Sharad Yadav also said that they don’t need permission from anyone to visit a place in their own country.

Interview | ‘BJP’s Hindutva Hasn’t Worked In Bengal, TMC Will Likely Improve Its Tally’

In conversation with TMC’s Dinesh Trivedi about BJP’s twin poll plank of nationalism and security, the changing face of Indian politics, the likelihood of a post-poll alliance in the state and more.

Dinesh Trivedi of the Trinamool Congress, who served as the railway minister during the first tenure of the United Progressive Alliance government, is currently eyeing a third consecutive term in the Lok Sabha.

In Barrackpore, the constituency Trivedi represents and which went to polls on May 6, he was up against Arjun Singh – who defected to the BJP after being denied a TMC ticket. Winning from the constituency has thus become a matter of prestige for the TMC and the BJP.

The Wire caught up with Trivedi as he was on his way to meet the police observer at Barasat district headquarters.

Edited excerpts of the interview:

You have represented Barrackpore two consecutive times. Do you find the 2019 election to be different in any way from the previous ones?

I have been in politics since 1984, but I have never seen such negativity. I couldn’t imagine that the political narrative would descend to such low levels. I have seen political leaders who were concerned solely about the country. We are not saints, but we never brought politics to this gutter level.

At a recent poll rally, Narendra Modi said: “Your (Rahul Gandhi) father’s life ended as Bhrashtachari No 1”.

The comment saddens me. The honorable prime minister of India, also my prime minister, is abusing Rajiv Gandhi just for petty politics. I should remind the prime minister that Rajiv Gandhi died a martyr, and will be remembered as one. We fought with Rajiv on Bofors. The controversy, though, did not lead anywhere.

 

Dinesh Trivedi. Credit: Twitter

Atal Bihar Vajpayee, in one of his books, wrote how Rajiv Gandhi – after the Congress’s landslide victory in 1984 – sent Atal ji to the UN. Rajiv Gandhi knew about Atal ji’s kidney problem and that he needed good treatment. Atal ji later said, ‘My life was saved by Rajiv Gandhi.’

That was the kind of politics back then. Look where we are today.

How do you view the BJP’s twin poll plank of nationalism and security?

The BJP is blatantly using the armed forces to seek votes. The party’s leaders are using terms like “Modi ki Sena” and what not. Are we North Korea? We are a fantastic, thriving democracy. Our forces are professional. By harping on the India-Pakistan narrative, the BJP is lowering India’s image. Pakistan is not a reference point in the discourse. India doesn’t deserve this.

Pakistan wants a weak India, a weak Kashmir. Pakistan wants our Hindus and Muslims to fight each other. The BJP, unfortunately, is doing just that by carrying on with the Pakistan agenda. For a thousand years, the Mughals, Afghans and the British tried to divide India. But the BJP has done more harm in the last five years that all of them put together.

There will be winners and losers in any election. But at no point should we tarnish the image of this great nation. The BJP is sullying the image of India, the image of Hindus.

Also read: In West Bengal, the BJP’s Ambition Outweighs Its Capacity

Today, because of the BJP, the Hindus have to prove they are Hindus, that they are patriots. The BJP is using Lord Ram as an election agent whereas Lord Ram resides in every individual. Ram is not only in Ayodhya, Ram is everywhere. But the BJP wants people to exhibit Ram. With nothing else to talk about, the party is ratcheting up these issues.

Media is focusing a lot on Barrackpore because of Arjun Singh’s last-minute switch to the BJP. How difficult is the fight this time?

I don’t entirely agree with the media attention on Barrackpore. The people’s choice here is simple and easy. They need to choose between development and mafia raj. People of Barrackpore know that the BJP candidate switched camps because Mamata denied him a ticket. We stand for education, healthcare, development and peace. Mafias have no place in Barrackpore. I feel the common people are treating this election as their own.

So, you are saying that Arjun Singh’s defection to the BJP won’t harm the TMC in Barrackpore?

I believe his exit from the party is hugely helping the TMC. If he didn’t leave the party, he would have, I’m sure, sabotaged the polls. He did so in 2014. Bhatpara is the only assembly constituency in Barrackpore which I lost by 2,600 votes.

Even the local BJP guys I speak with don’t like him (Arjun Singh), and they want him to lose. Modi talks of dynasty politics all the time. But the BJP has nominated Arjun Singh’s son as its candidate in the Bhatpara assembly by-poll. This has virtually pushed the BJP out of the contest.

There is no guarantee that (Arjun Singh) is going to stick around in the BJP in the future – which is the case with people who overnight switch political allegiance for personal gains. I am not saying this, it’s the local BJP supporters who are saying so. People of Barrackpore are not with Arjun Singh.

Recently, in Bhatpara municipality (part of Arjun Singh’s assembly constituency), the board successfully executed a no-confidence motion against him. The councillors who defeated him were his own men, even then they didn’t support him. This shows the BJP’s position in Barrackpore.

The BJP, no doubt, has grown as a political party in Bengal. As a TMC veteran, how much will this factor impact the election?

I don’t think the BJP is going to gain too much in Bengal. Our internal assessment reveals that they are going to lose Asansol and Darjeeling, which they won last time. The BJP’s expansion signalling a shift of votes from the Left to the BJP is a cause for concern. I feel Mamata will improve her tally this time because the bottom line is that the BJP’s Hindutva hasn’t worked in Bengal. The party could perhaps improve its vote share here and there, but that will not translate into seats.

The BJP, through various media outlets, has created the myth that it’s set to make inroads in Bengal. With all due respect to the Delhi media, not all, but many have no idea of the ground reality. They go by the whisper campaigning of the RSS and the BJP. I am not blaming the entire media fraternity, but a section of the media has become agents of the BJP.

Also read: Why West Bengal Won’t Compensate BJP for Hindi Heartland Losses

West Bengal is likely to play a crucial role in case a coalition government is formed. How do you view such a possibility?

Mamata is going to play a pivotal role in India. People of Bengal want to see the state playing a significant role at the Centre so that the development of Bengal and of India goes hand-in-hand. When Mamata took charge, ending 34 years of Left rule, Bengal was bankrupt. Slowly with conviction and determination, she has tried to rebuild Bengal. Progress and development led by the TMC government are now visible everywhere in the state.

We have got over 30 schemes, Kanyashree being the flagship. A lot of work has been done by this government. A lot still needs to be done. From demonetisation to GST implementation, Mamata is the only person who has taken Modi on with conviction. She is not scared of anybody. The Centre tried its best to intimidate her with all the Central agencies it has at its command but failed.

Is TMC in touch with the other regional parties to consider a post-poll alliance scenario?

Yes, definitely. The party’s top leadership is monitoring developments across the country. Regional parties will play the most crucial role in deciding who forms the next government at the Centre. Right now, our primary objective is to defeat the BJP.

Do you think Mamata Banerjee is eyeing the prime minister’s chair?

What I gather is that she is not looking for any chair or position. She is fighting an ideological battle in Bengal. Her primary aim is to oust the BJP from the Centre. She is a decisive leader who wants democracy restored, federal structure fixed and institutions empowered. She single-handedly solved the Darjeeling dispute, the Jangalmahal issue. She is willing to work together with the other leaders and form a strong government at the Centre. But right now, the priority is to defeat the BJP.

Himadri Ghosh is a Kolkata-based journalist.

Opposition Parties Unite to Oppose Amendments to RTI Act

In agreement that the Modi government wants to control salaries and tenures of information commissioners through these changes, at least six parties declared their intent to oppose the amendments when they are moved.

New Delhi: Leaders of a large number of opposition parties today came together to denounce the proposed amendments to the RTI Act that have been moved by the Narendra Modi government and to demand the immediate operationalisation of anti-corruption laws.

Speaking at a people’s convention or ‘jan manch’ organised by the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information, senior leaders of the Congress, Communist Party of India (Marxist), CPI, Rashtriya Janata Dal and Trinamool Congress declared that they would oppose any amendments to the RTI Act, 2005.

At the Jan Manch, a resolution was also passed to demand that the RTI Act not be diluted through amendments which seek to place in the hands of the Centre the powers of determining the tenure and salaries of all the information commissioners, including the chiefs, in both the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions. The resolution had also demanded immediate operationalisation of the Whistleblowers Protection Act and the Lokpal law, introduction of the Grievance Redressal Bill and opposed the lack of transparency in electoral funding due to introduction of electoral bonds.

Speaking at the meet, Rajeev Gowda of the Congress said his party would oppose any amendment to the RTI Act. He also accused the BJP government at the Centre of destroying every institution and legislation of transparency and accountability. Gowda said the Congress would also support the demand for implementation and passage of the other anti-corruption laws.

General secretary of CPI(M) Sitaram Yechury said the RTI Act came about after a long and hard struggle of the people. He said his party would support the demand to not dilute the RTI Act and assured that it would work both within and outside parliament to ensure that the RTI Act was not amended.

Another Communist leader, D. Raja of the CPI said his party was very clear in its position and would not allow any dilution of the RTI Act. His colleague and party national secretary Atul Kumar Anjaan said the BJP government wanted to weaken the RTI Act as it is a tool in the hands of the ordinary citizens for fighting corruption. “Who are the people who are opposed to this RTI Act? They are those who are involved in the loot of public money,” he said.

Anjaan said any tinkering with the RTI Act would be worse than rape as it would directly impact those who are poor and socially marginalised. He also charged that the Modi government has not got a Lokpal appointed in its four year rule thus far. “Now,” he quipped, “they are talking about it when its term is about to come to an end and the elections are only a few months away.”

Manoj Kumar Jha of the RJD said the government was trying to destroy the RTI Act as they have no answers to people’s questions. Trinamool leader Dinesh Trivedi too said his party would oppose the amendments to the RTI Act.

Later, Aam Aadmi Party leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh said that his party would block all attempts to get the amendments to the RTI Act introduced in parliament. He said it was clear that by controlling the purse-strings of the information commissioner, the Modi government wanted to curb their independence and freedom of deliver orders fearlessly.

The leaders of all these opposition parties were in unison that the failure of the Modi government in enacting or implementing the anti-corruption laws showed its real intent and face.

Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, who was part of the Lokpal movement, said the government was also trying to undermine the independence of the judiciary and that it was crucial that people campaign against all these attempts to dilute these important institutions.

Anjali Bhardwaj and Nikhil Dey of NCPRI declared that a follow up to today’s protests, which were also held in Gujarat and Rajasthan, similar demonstrations would be held all over the country to oppose the amendments to the RTI Act.

The gathering was also attended and addressed among others by former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, Harsh Mander of Centre for Equity Studies and former major general Anil Verma of Association for Democratic Rights.

BJP Leader Yashwant Sinha to Launch National Forum for ‘Concerned’ Leaders

“The forum is for leaders who are concerned with the prevailing situation in the country,” Sinha said.

“The forum is for leaders who are concerned with the prevailing situation in the country,” Sinha said.

Yashwant Sinha. Credit: PTI

Yashwant Sinha. Credit: PTI

New Delhi: Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Yashwant Sinha, who has turned a strong critic of the central government, will today launch ‘Rashtra Manch’ (national forum), a body, he said, for political leaders and others “concerned” with the prevailing situation in the country.

Trinamool Congress member of parliament Dinesh Trivedi said he would also join it. There is also speculation about a disgruntled MP of the ruling alliance joining it.

Asked about others who would join him, Sinha said it would be disclosed today but added that they would join the forum in their individual capacity to air their concern over the current situation.

“The forum is for leaders who are concerned with the prevailing situation in the country,” he said.

Sinha, the former minister in the NDA government headed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee cabinet, has often criticised the incumbent government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi over a host of issues, including its economic policy and the recent judicial crisis.

“Whatever you do, I will not run away from my duties. Calling the youth of the country to join the movement,” he said in a tweet.

The development is likely to be seen as an attempt to step up an attack against the government and to build an atmosphere against the BJP-led NDA in the countdown to the next Lok Sabha polls, scheduled in the first half of the next year.

With 2019 Elections in Mind, Opposition Leaders Come Together for a ‘Save the Constitution’ Rally

To highlight the ‘threat to the Indian constitution’ posed by BJP, opposition parties held an alternative Republic Day event in Mumbai.

To highlight the ‘threat to the Indian constitution’ posed by BJP, opposition parties held an alternative Republic Day event in Mumbai.

The rally is believed to have been organised in response to the alleged attempt by the BJP to dilute the constitution. Credit: The Wire

Mumbai: On India’s 69th republic Day, leaders of several opposition parties took part in a ‘Samvidhan Bachao’ (save the constitution) rally at Mumbai’s Gateway of India in what is being seen as an early attempt to project unity to challenge the BJP in the upcoming 2019 elections.

“Our Constitution is under a great threat. We have to save it before it is too late,” said Narayan Prakhar, before breaking into a slogan “Samvidhan bachaana hain, fascism hataana hai (We have to save the constitution to get rid of fascism)”. Prakhar, a Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) worker from Nashik had travelled to Mumbai along with over two dozen other party workers to participate in the rally.

Prominent names who walked a short distance from the statue of Dr BR Ambedkar till Gateway of India, a 20-minute walk, included Nationalist Congress Party’s Sharad Pawar, Congress’ Prithviraj Chavan and Ashok Chavan, Omar Abdullah of the National Conference, CPI(M)’s Sitaram Yechury and JDU’s Sharad Yadav. They were joined by Communist Party of India’s D Raja, All India Trinamool Congress’ Dinesh Trivedi and Gujarat youth leaders Hardik Patel and Alpesh Thakor. Hundreds of activists also joined the march.

A prominent absentee was Prakash Ambedkar, who has emerged as a powerful Dalit voice in Maharashtra and outside. No representatives of the southern Dravidian parties were present either.

The rally, believed to be organised in response to the alleged attempt by the BJP to dilute the constitution, managed to bring different political parties on the same platform, including those who have been openly critical of each other. For instance, Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana (SSS) MP Raju Shetti, who is known for his clear anti-NCP stand and had in the past aligned with the BJP, did not mind sharing the same space as his opponent.

“The BJP has the power and the position to introduce any change to the constitution. A union minister (referring to Anant Kumar Hegde) has spoken about the possible changes to the constitution already and made his intent clear. We cannot be waiting silently and allow the BJP to make this grave mistake,” Shetti said. “It is not about one party but about consolidating all pro-constitution forces.”

“Since 1947, we have been deriving our identity from the Indian constitution. We all have come here to send across a message that to save the country, the constitution should be protected,” Abdullah said.

“It was a symbolic rally which began from Ambedkar’s statue and ended near Shivaji Maharaj’s statue, only to remind us what we have and what is getting eroded,” said Prithviraj Chavan, senior Congress leader and former chief minister of Maharashtra.

Asking to forget the differences among the parties assembled at the rally, Chavan said this is the moment to challenge the government that has moved towards “dictatorship”.

“All secular people, who have a stake in democracy, should unite to fight against the BJP. They are attempting to change the constitution and this poses a grave threat to the country,” Chavan said.

The rally considered to be conceived and spearheaded by the NCP leader Jitendra Ahwad was successful to an extent of putting together a substantial show of opposition. “The rally went on as expected. Leaders from Delhi and elsewhere flew down to participate in this. We want to bring out a strong opposition this time and prepare much ahead of time,” Ahwad claimed.

Ahwad also hinted at the possible support to the Congress in 2019. In 2014, post the state assembly elections, NCP had decided to ditch its long- time ally Congress and support the BJP. Pawar had then claimed the decision was taken in the interest of “stability of the state“.

Opposition leaders who have been protesting Hindutva, vigilantism and alleged persecution of minorities and Dalits found ‘Save the Constitution’ an ideal platform to come together. “What happened in Bhima Koregaon recently is also quite telling about the state in which BJP-rules states are. Only Constitution can save this country from further disintegration,” said Thakur, Congress’ young MLA who won from Radhanpur constituency in the recent Gujarat assembly election.

Ahead of the rally, the leaders had attended a meeting at the official residence of leader of opposition in Maharashtra Assembly Radhakrishna Vikhe Patil in South Mumbai. This meeting was to chart out the crucial agenda for the rally, Ahwad explained. Later in the day, Pawar announced that the opposition parties will meet in New Delhi on January 29 to mull on the way ahead in the fight against the BJP.

This rally is believed to have sent the BJP leadership in the state into a tizzy pushing Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to arrange for a “Tiranga rally” starting from Chaityabhoomi – another landmark location in Mumbai where Dr Ambedkar was cremated – and culminated at Kamgar Maidan in Parel.

Sharad Yadav called the BJP’s rally a yet another attempt by the party to derail an “important conversation” around the constitution of the country which is under a direct threat of being “diluted”. “Every time there is a talk of the condition of the country, on poverty, unemployment, BJP is ready with a most inconsequential issue. They will rake up anything from Taj Mahal to anti-nationalism when questioned about their intent and work in 40 months,” he said, addressing the media.

Yechury claimed the fundamental rights of people, guaranteed by the constitution, were being “assaulted” by the ruling party.

“All the opposition parties have come together at the Gateway of India, which was once seen as a sign of slavery but is now a sign of freedom to save our democratic institutions, for which we have taken an oath,” he said.

The coming together of NCP and Congress on a public platform is also significant given that the former had publicly separated from the latter ahead of the 2014 elections. More so, in October the same year, the NCP announced its support for the BJP even as the election results were coming in, thus increasing the latter’s bargaining power with the Shiv Sena in Maharashtra.

Pawar has been seen as offering on and off support to the BJP, critical of government policies one day and diplomatically silent the other. On Friday, he declared that the NCP would only go with the Congress in the next elections.

“However, there were one or two persons who were in leadership position in the state who did not want the alliance, but that is history now and there is no bitterness now,” Pawar said in a newspaper interview.

Whether fool proof or not, today’s rally has managed to open up several possibilities of alliances and possibly an emergence of a much-required formidable opposition against the ruling BJP in the upcoming Lok Sabha polls in 2019.