No Swadeshi Name Likely for the Indian Air Force’s Rafale Fighter

From the Toofani, Ajeet and Marut, to Cheetah, Dhruv, Rakshak, Shamsher, Baaz, Rana, Akbar and Tejas, the IAF believed in giving an Indian touch to its aircraft. But the naming practice was abandoned some two decades ago.

Chandigarh: It’s highly unlikely that the Dassault Rafale fighters, five of which were commissioned into Indian Air Force (IAF) service earlier this month, will be given a native name like previous platforms which were christened upon induction with an Indian moniker.

For nearly five decades, till the early 1990’s the IAF bestowed almost all its imported combat and transport aircraft and helicopters and indigenously developed platforms, with catchy and robust local appellations that were shortlisted by a senior officers committee at Air Headquarters in New Delhi, and finally approved by the air chief.

Expectedly, this committee delved into India’s rich animal world, mythology and history, before deciding on appealing names which, in many instances also depicted the designated platforms’ capabilities.

“There’s no room for romance, imagination or chutzpah in the IAF these days,” said former Air Commodore ‘Sandy’ Indrajit Singh Sandhu, a distinguished fighter and test pilot from his farmhouse outside Chandigarh. The force has become professional, demanding and somewhat detached with little or no time for enchanting idiosyncrasies like nicknaming aircraft, he added woefully.

Also Read: Nearly Seven Decades Before Rafale, the Unheralded Arrival of Another Dassault Aircraft

Over the years many local names bestowed on IAF platforms had fallen into disuse, with many even in the service either forgetting them or recalling them with effort. Senior retired officers also regretted that the agreeable practice of aircraft naming had been discontinued two decades ago, following somewhat feeble reasoning that it was ‘extraneous and superfluous’.

Consequently, the Russian Sukhoi Su-30MKI multi-role fighter that joined IAF service 1997 onwards does not have an indigenous name and neither do imported transporters like Lockheed Martin’s C-130J-30 and Boeings C-17 ‘Globemaster’ or the AH-64E Apache attack and CH-47F Chinook heavy-lift helicopters.

Earlier, the French MD 450 Ouragan fighter-bombers, also made by Dassault which, like the Rafales were commissioned at Ambala Air Force Station in 1953, were the first to be nicknamed. They were called Toofanis, a direct translation from the aircraft’s French name, meaning Hurricane. Veteran officers recall that the principal reason behind naming them Toofanis was that most technicians and even pilots had difficulty in pronouncing Ouragan (oo-rhay-gon) properly.

The Dassault Ouragon fighters were known as Toofanis. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/ Alec Wilson CC BY SA 2.0

Thereafter, the practice of nicknaming platforms gained currency. The French Alouette III light utility helicopter that was inducted into service in the early 1960s was christened Chetak whilst the Aerospatiale SA-315B rotorcraft that followed over a decade later became Cheetah. A more advanced version of the former rotorcraft, developed much later by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, was called Cheetal, while the indigenously designed Advanced Light Helicopter was called Dhruv, or constant, in Sanskrit.

Parallel to this, India’s first indigenously designed fighter-bomber in 1961, the HF (Hindustan Fighter)-24 was nicknamed Marut or Spirit of the Tempest, while the licence built derivative of the British Folland Gnat light attack fighter and trainer, that joined IAF service in 1977, was called Ajeet. Over two decades later, the locally designed Light Combat Aircraft was baptised as Tejas, meaning brilliantly lustrous. Fortunately, that’s a name that’s in popular use in and out of the IAF.

The Tejas light combat aircraft, whose disappointing progress has opened avenues for global defence firms. Credit: Reuters

A Tejas light combat aircraft. Photo: Reuters

Soviet fighters began joining the IAF in 1964, with MiG-21M variants being commissioned into service as Trishul (trident), while the more advanced MiG-21 BIS was christened Vikram (valorous). The subsequent MiG-23BN strike fighter and its MiG-23MF air defence variant, inducted during the IAF’s ‘golden era’ of inductions in the early 1980s, were named Vijay (victory) and Rakshak (protector) respectively. Moreover, the IAF’s classified MiG-25 reconnaissance platform was christened Garuda, after the mythological bird-like creature whose purported activities were as mysterious and enigmatic as those of the aircraft.

The MiG-25 reconnaissance fighter was nicknamed Garuda. Photo: Himmat Rathore/Flickr CC BY 2.0

Later IAF additions, like the ground attack Jaguars were baptised Shamsher (Sword of Justice), the MiG-29 as Baaz (Eagle) and the French Mirage-2000Hs, also made by Dassault, was called Vajra, meaning thunderbolt of the gods, a name the fighter has lived up to in many recent missions.

The IAF’s Russian Ilyushin IL-76 transport aircraft were befittingly called Gajraj, whilst the smaller Antonov An-32s were dubbed the Sutlej. Rotorcraft like the medium-lift Russian Mil Mi-8 helicopter was named Rana, and its subsequent upgraded version the Mil Mi-17 Pratap, subtly combining the names of the 16th century legendary Rajput warrior Maharana Pratap on two platforms. The Mil Mi-25/35 attack helicopter was cheekily nicknamed Akbar, after the Mughal potentate who defeated the Mewar Maharana at Haldighati in 1568.

IAF’s Mil Mi-8 helicopter, which was known as Rana after the Rajput warrior. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Mark Steele, Public Domain

Monikers of pilots

Meanwhile, no account of distinct Indian names for IAF aircraft would be complete without some of the equally, if not more appealing and somewhat mysterious nicknames the pilots that operated them were given. But unlike the aircraft names, the pilots’ monikers remain in use, often with their real names becoming a little fuzzy at times for veterans to recall.

In some instances, inquiries into the origin of these intriguing sobriquets are fobbed off, presumably because they were acquired by rambunctious or rowdy antics from a bygone era. A large number of these aliases, though, originated from either shortening or transforming the pilots first or last names; for example, all Randhawas in the IAF came to be and are still called Randy, all Grewals are Garry and all Gills are Gilly.

Similarly, Air Chief Marshal (ACM) A.Y. Tipnis was unexcitingly known as Tippy and one of his illustrious predecessors, Swaroop Krishna Kaul, was prosaically called Supi. Other IAF chiefs with more enigmatic names included L.M. Katre, known as Baba, S.K. Mehra who was nicknamed Polly, S.K. Sareen lovingly called Bruno and S.P. Tyagi puzzlingly nicknamed Bundle. Expectedly, ACM N.A.K. Browne was fondly referred to as ‘Charlie’ after the eponymous comic book character, and the recently retired B.S. Dhanoa’s nickname in the force and outside it is, curiously, Tony.

Air Commodore Mehar Singh, who was affectionately known as ‘Mehar Baba’. Photo: indianairforce. nic.in

The renowned IAF fighter pilot, Air Commodore Mehar Singh was affectionately called ‘Mehar Baba’ or Graceful Saint, a sobriquet coined by Aspy Engineer, independent India’s second chief of air staff. Awarded the Maha Vir Chakra or MVC and the Distinguished Service Order or DSO, Baba flew dangerous missions in a Dakota during the 1947-48 Kashmir operations transporting Indian Army soldiers to the besieged Valley. Baba was also the first IAF pilot to land in Srinagar, Poonch and Leh.

But there’s great enigma surrounding ‘Jimmy’, the nickname of Air Marshal V.K. Bhatia, one of the IAF’s fiercest and most decorated fighter pilots. When queried about its origin, the former three-star officer resorts to the sort of artful dodges he no doubt successfully executed in aerial combat in the 1965 and 1971 wars with Pakistan.

He says he was christened Jimmy ‘one quirky afternoon’ over pink gins at lunch in the 1960s at one of Assam’s expansive tea plantations, then still managed by Englishmen. The details of the lunch are deliberately hazy and nebulous in the telling, but thereafter Jimmy went on to secure the Vir Chakra and Bar in two successive wars, a feat few in the IAF have achieved before or since.

The same afternoon, Jimmy recalls one of his colleagues Darshan Singh Basra being named Mack-the Chhuri, after ‘Mack the Knife’, the popular song from the roaring ’20s, which presumably figured on the turntable during the allegedly feisty afternoon in Assam. The Mack moniker prevailed for Basra’s lifetime.

“Those were days filled with adventure, style and elan,” said Jimmy Bhatia nostalgically. “Sadly, with time and pressure all that has ebbed”.

IAF Did Not Shoot Down Pak F-16 in Balakot Aftermath, Says US Scholar Christine Fair

Fair, whose work on Pakistan is frequently cited by the Indian side, took on former air chief BS Dhanoa, saying the IAF narrative is not based on an empirical body of facts but dictated more by “things deployed by politicians to win elections”.

Chandigarh: Minutes after retired Air Chief Marshal B.S. Dhanoa attacked the Pakistani claim that IAF bombers dropped their payloads in haste and missed their target on February 26 when they bombed a Jaish-e-Mohammed terror camp in Balakot, Christine Fair – an expert on South Asian political and military affairs – said the IAF story of the operation and its aftermath is based on ‘dubious’ claims.

Fair, a professor of security studies at Georgetown University who has spent many years researching in Pakistan, stirred up a heated debate at the Military Literature Festival in Chandigarh on Saturday when she went on to assert that she did not believe India shot down an F-16 fighter during the dogfight between Indian and Pakistani jets in the aftermath of the Indian airstrikes over Balakot.

“I say this clearly with 100% certitude that there was no F-16 struck down. I do not believe you did. I believe that my bonafides as a critic of Pakistan stand for itself,” she said before a stunned audience. But Fair added that she and many others in the Pentagon actually wished that the IAF had indeed shot down the F-16, because India had “a right to bomb Pakistan” in retaliation for the Pulwama attack.

She, however, questioned the IAF’s narrative about the incident, saying that it is not based on an empirical body of facts but dictated more by “things deployed by politicians to win elections…. The world outside of India does not see things the way they were said here today. Though, I wish they were true.”

Fair  is the author of Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army’s Way of War, a brutal critique of the Pakistan army that analyses why it is a destabilising force in world politics.

File photo of C. Christine Fair. Photo: By New America, CC BY 2.0

‘India has lost a lot of credibility’

Amidst some interruptions from the audience – comprising mostly retired and serving defence officers – Fair went on to allege that the video of the purported F-16 going down in Pakistani territory and Punjabi speaking villagers talking about a pilot having crashed there, shared extensively on social media, was “fake”. She maintained that “India has lost a lot of credibility in the ways that certain images have been deployed through social media that do not show what they show, with the level of certainty that is asserted.”

Also Read: What Will Be the Strategic Ripple Effects of Balakot?

India awarded Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman a Vir Chakra for shooting down a Pakistani F-16, described by the IAF as an aircraft superior to the MIG21 Bison that Varthaman was flying. Fair, countered this by saying, “Avionics experts outside of India are unanimous in their opinion that this particular MIG Bison was superior on virtually every respect to that particular F-16 that Pakistan flies.” Cautioning India against persisting with this narrative, Fair said that it does not serve the country’s  interests because “though a little Bison taking down the mighty Falcon might be good for political consumption but it also makes a case that your airforce does not need a more modern weapon system.”

Fair’s assertions now, are however a revision of her stand in March this year, when she held, “After various claims and counter-claims, it now seems clear that Pakistan shot down a MiG 21 and captured its pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, who was returned after considerable delay on March 1st. India, in turn, shot down a Pakistani jet which crashed on Pakistan’s side of the LoC. The fate of that pilot is unclear: Indian sources claim he was lynched by Pakistanis who mistook him for an Indian pilot while Pakistani sources deny this claim without offering alternative explanations.”

But on Saturday, speaking in the presence of Dhanoa and two other senior IAF officers, Fair also questioned India’s claim of extensive damage to the terror camp at Balakot based on images from open sources, saying that from an international point of view, these have not been accepted. “They are refuted by many scholars who are actually India’s friends.”

Also Read: New High Res Satellite Imagery Suggests Balakot Airstrike a ‘Very Precise Miss’

She said the immediate analyses using satellite imagery done by independent experts “does not show the damage which we have been presented with”. The IAF has maintained that extensive damage to the buildings did not take place because it used guided Spice bombs that enter a structure through small openings and kill the occupants without destroying the buildings. Accusing India of ‘confirmation bias where it is presenting evidence that it wants to believe’, Fair said that the Spice weapons work in the intended manner when they are dropped on a “hardened structure like the Pentagon building” but while landing on a corrugated steel roof like the one at the Balakot terror camp, the structure would surely have been devastated.

‘IAF did not drop bombs hastily’

Earlier, former Air Chief Dhanoa, who is seen as the architect of the Balakot strikes, said during the same panel discussion that there was no reason for the IAF jets to drop their bombs hastily and miss the target when the nearest interceptor (aircraft) was 150 km away. The PAF had secured the Bahawalpur camp of the Jaish but there were no terminal defences at Balakot, which went to show that the PAF is not kept informed about the ISI’s terror operations, he said. Pakistan had vacated the forward terror bases in anticipation of retaliation after Pulwama, but the PAF did not anticipate the attack so deep into its territory and on Balakot.

Maintaining that details of the Balakot operation are still classified, Dhanoa added, “Operational capability involved in the Balakot attacks and our intelligence capability cannot be compromised just to win a perception battle in the media.”

Balakot air strike

Pakistan army soldiers walk near to the crater where Indian military aircrafts released payload in Jaba village, Balakot, Pakistan February 28, 2019. REUTERS/Asif Shahzad

He also disclosed the reason for the government’s bold decision to launch airstrikes in Pakistani territory was, “All the three services assured the government that should there be an escalation of the conflict, they are ready. This kind of limited period engagement suits the PAF as it cannot match a conventional response.”

But Fair said that the real worry about the lessons from Balakot, as she saw it, is that in any future conflict arising out of a terror attack, which she believed is sure to happen, the offer to off-ramp and de-escalate the conflict should be based on empirical verifiable facts and analyses and not on things we want to believe. She compared the IAF’s alleged misrepresentation of facts to Colin Powell showing photographs of aluminium tubes at the United Nations Security Council to tell the world that Iraq had a nuclear programme, when the USA was building a case for a war on Iraq in 2003. “He knew at the time that that’s not what the photos could show.”

Chander Suta Dogra is a journalist and author.

Rajnath Singh, IAF Chief Dhanoa to Receive Delivery of First Rafale in France Next Month

Top military brass of France will also be present at the handing over ceremony, likely to be held on September 20.

New Delhi: Defence minister Rajnath Singh and Air Chief Marshal B.S. Dhanoa are set to travel to Paris next month to receive the first of 36 Rafale fighter jets for the Indian Air Force, government sources said Wednesday.

They said top military brass of France as well as senior officials of the Dassault Aviation, the makers of Rafale, will also be present at the handing over ceremony which is likely to be held on September 20.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is leaving for France on Thursday on a bilateral visit during which further boosting of defence cooperation between the two countries will be discussed. Sources said that a high-level team of the Indian Air Force is already in Paris to coordinate with the French officials on the handing over ceremony.

India had inked an inter-governmental agreement with France in September 2016 for the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets at a cost of around Rs 58,000 crore. The aircraft is capable of carrying a range of potent weapons and missiles.

The IAF has already completed preparations, including readying required infrastructure and training of pilots, to welcome the fighter aircraft. Sources said the first squadron of the aircraft will be deployed at Ambala air force station, considered one of the most strategically located bases of the IAF. The Indo-Pak border is around 220 km from there. The second squadron of Rafale will be stationed at Hasimara base in West Bengal.

Also Read: New Rafale Affidavit: Key Issues Modi Government Continues to Duck

A number of IAF teams have already visited France to help Dassault Aviation, the manufacturer of Rafale, incorporate India-specific enhancements on-board the fighter aircraft. The Rafale jets will come with various India-specific modifications, including Israeli helmet-mounted displays, radar warning receivers, low band jammers, 10-hour flight data recording, infra-red search and tracking systems among others.

The Congress raised several questions about the deal, including on rates of the aircraft, and alleged corruption but the government has rejected the charges.

The IAF spent around Rs 400 crore to develop the required infrastructure like shelters, hangers and maintenance facilities at the two bases.

In July 2017, Air Chief Marshal Dhanoa, during his visit to France, flew a Rafale jet at the Saint-Dizier airbase to gain first-hand experience of the aircraft.

According to the deal, the delivery of the jets was to be completed in 67 months from the date the contract was inked.