BJP-Congress Contest in Haryana Centres Around Jat Dominance

The challenger seeks to trigger a social churn, while the incumbent prefers the status quo.

The electoral canvassing over the last two months in Haryana, marked as much by big promises as internal rebellions, has clearly indicated that the upcoming assembly elections on October 5 is a direct contest between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and the Congress. The regional forces like the Om Prakash Chautala-led Indian National Lok Dal or the Dushyant Chautala-led Jannayak Janta Party have failed to enthuse voters on the ground.

There is, however, a social dimension that may prove to be the most crucial factor in the polls. The BJP’s prospects will depend on its ability to keep its plank of social polarisation intact by pitting all Hindu communities against the dominant Jat peasantry, while the Congress, under the leadership of Bhupinder Singh Hooda, will look to foreground macro concerns like unemployment, farmers’ movement, and rising inequalities in the largely agrarian state.

The assembly polls in Haryana will essentially be a contest between the BJP’s ability to exploit the state’s deep social contradictions that may potentially cancel out the poor track record of two successive saffron governments in the state and Congress’s eagerness to reach out to and make a positive impact on non-Jat communities that may help it compensate for its largely unrepresentative leadership in the state.

For decades, Haryana has had chief ministers who belonged to the dominant Jat community, including Bansi Lal, Devi Lal, Om Prakash Chautala, and most recently Bhupinder Singh Hooda. Despite constituting merely 27% of the state’s population, the community owns the largest share of land holdings in the state – both agrarian and non-agrarian. The caste group has also a disproportionate access to the state’s resources. In the last two decades, it became infamous for its socially-conservative views, which included many of its leaders justifying even honour killings of women who chose independent paths. However, the members of the community now feel squeezed by a structural agrarian crisis of the last few decades, and have become prominent participants in nationwide farmers’ stirs and demand for reservation in jobs and education.

Also read: Close Contest in Haryana’s Ladwa As Unemployment, Farmers’ Distress Cloud Hopes of ‘CM City’

Other communities in the state have long resented the disproportionate dominance of Jats in the state and view the community as oppressive and discriminatory. These communities, a large section of which had lived under an exploitative feudal order and had been feeling similarly cornered in market-driven development models, began to perceive the Jats’ demand for reservation as yet another ploy to deny them their constitutional and political rights.

The ever-sharpening social fault line is what BJP, bolstered further by Narendra Modi’s leadership, could exploit for its electoral advantage in 2014. The saffron party secured two back-to-back victories in the state by consolidating a majority of 35 communities of the state in its favour and pitting them against the dominant community, the Jats. The BJP’s slogan “35 banaam 1 (35 against 1)” in the last two assembly polls in the state captured the imagination of a large chunk of non-Jat caste groups.

Given the fact that the BJP had negligible organisational presence in the state, it readily elevated non-Jat leaders to high positions and even went on to give Haryana its first Punjabi Khatri chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar and now its first Saini chief minister Nayab Singh Saini.

However, the Congress appears to have made a strong comeback after 10 long years, and is buoyant about its prospects. It has surely received a fillip from Khattar’s poor governance and the saffron party’s failure to go beyond its formula of equitable political representation and actually help make substantive improvements in living conditions of non-Jat communities.

The Congress has taken care to field a substantial number of non-Jats in the electoral arena, while also aggressively campaigning along material concerns of people across all communities. As a result, unemployment, the Agnipath scheme, irregular procurement of grains, price rise, and above all poor leadership provided by both Khattar and Saini have become the biggest talking points in the run-up to the assembly polls, lending a perceptible advantage to the grand-old party.

The BJP, however, is fighting anti-incumbency by running a strong ground-level campaign targeting the Jat leadership of the Congress, and hopes to drown out the macro factors working against it. For most voters, the Hooda clan represents the Congress in Haryana. All other Congress leaders from different communities like Kumari Selja, a Dalit, or Chander Mohan Bishnoi, former chief minister Bhajan Lal Bishnoi’s son, lack the grip that Hooda has on the state unit of the party.

Despite the Congress’s failure to adequately represent and empower leaders from non-Jat communities over the last decade, all the party leaders have consistently made it a point to be seen as inclusive. “36 biradariyon ka samarthan hai humein (All 36 communities are supporting us),” the Congress leaders have often been heard as asserting in all their statements, turning such an assumption into almost a slogan for their party. To offset Hooda’s perception as a only a Jat leader, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi have extensively campaigned across a large number of regions where non-Jat communities are numerically strong.

As voters will organise themselves into factions ahead of polling, both the Congress and the BJP can expect a tough run. The challenger seeks to trigger a social churn, while the incumbent prefers the status quo.

This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.

Haryana’s Changing Political Arena: Legacy Families Fade While the Hooda Clan Maintains Dominance

In the political landscape of Haryana, Bhupinder Hooda stands out as a towering figure whose influence remains significant even a decade after his tenure as Chief Minister. Serving from 2005 to 2014, Hooda was the first Chief Minister in Haryana’s history to win two consecutive terms.

Until 2014, Haryana’s political landscape was largely shaped by a few influential families, including the Bhajan Lal, Devi Lal, Bansi Lal, and Bhupinder Hooda clans, which dominated the state’s politics for few decades. However, the rise of the BJP marked a dramatic shift in the state’s political dynamics.

As the BJP emerged as a dominant force in the state, the influence of these once-powerful families began to wane. The exception to this trend is the Hooda family, which, despite the broader changes, continues to maintain a significant political presence not just in Rohtak and Sonipat but across Haryana.

In the latest parliamentary elections, the political scene in Haryana underwent a dramatic transformation. The Congress party managed to secure five seats, while the BJP claimed an equal number. Meanwhile, the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD), under Abhay Chautala, and the Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), led by Dushyant Chautala, faced substantial setbacks.

Abhay Chautala of the INLD, who contested in the Kurukshetra parliamentary constituency, finished in third place with approximately 6.5% of the vote. Similarly, JJP’s Naina Chautala, the sitting MLA of Bhadra and Dushyant Chautala’s mother, ended up in fifth place in Hisar Parliament, capturing only about 1.9% of the vote.

The Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), which won ten assembly seats in the 2019 elections, now holds only three seats –  Dushyant Chautala from Uchana Kalan, Naina Chautala from Bhadra, and Amarjeet Danda from Julana assembly – after seven MLAs either switched to Congress or BJP.

During my visit to Kabarcha village in Uchana Kalan, where Dushyant Chautala is the MLA, I met Rakesh, a local resident who mentioned that the village’s support has shifted. Initially, the voters were aligned with the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) and then with the JJP following the INLD’s split in 2019. However, now the villagers seem to be leaning towards the Congress party, driven by a desire for change in the state and Bhupinder Hooda’s influence, which cannot be ignored.

SC voters abandoning regional parties

For the upcoming assembly election, the JJP has formed an alliance with Chandra Shekhar Azad’s Azad Samaj Party (ASP), a party with minimal presence in the state. This alliance appears unlikely to be mutually beneficial. Additionally, the JJP’s decline is attributed to growing voter dissatisfaction, especially in the Hisar district – a traditional stronghold of the late Chaudhary Devi Lal and former Chief Minister Om Prakash Chautala.

The JJP’s post poll alliance with the BJP and its perceived insensitivity during the farmer protests have significantly eroded its support. Many viewed this alliance as discordant, further contributing to the JJP’s diminishing influence.

Similarly, the INLD, another political force with legacy politics, has faced a significant decline, securing only one seat in the 2019 assembly elections, with Abhay Chautala winning from the Ellenabad constituency.

For the upcoming assembly elections, the INLD has formed an alliance with the BSP to attract SC voters. However, Suman Bhatnagar, a prominent journalist based in Ambala, suggests that this alliance is unlikely to make a substantial impact.

According to Bhatnagar, recent elections indicate that SC voters have been increasingly aligning with either the Congress or BJP, which diminishes the potential effectiveness of the INLD-BSP coalition. These shifting political dynamics in Haryana highlight a departure from the previously dominant family-based political structure, as new alliances and evolving voter sentiments continue to reshape the state’s political landscape.

Another prominent figure from legacy politics, Kiran Chaudhary, a former Congress leader and daughter-in-law of former Haryana Chief Minister late Bansi Lal, has seen significant shifts in her political career in recent years. After being denied a ticket by the Congress Party for the Bhiwani-Mahendragarh parliamentary constituency, Chaudhary resigned and joined the BJP.

Subsequently, she was nominated to the Rajya Sabha by the BJP while serving as an MLA from the Tosham assembly constituency which falls under the Bhiwani district. Despite these roles, her political influence appears to be increasingly confined to this seat. Speculation suggests that her daughter, Shruti Chaudhary, a former MP from Bhiwani-Mahendragarh, may contest the Tosham assembly constituency in the upcoming elections.

This potential move indicates a narrowing of the Bansi Lal family’s political reach. However, Shruti Chaudhary faces significant challenges, particularly given the Jat dominance in the Tosham constituency and the influence of Bhupinder Hooda, whose sway among the Jat community could complicate her electoral prospects.

Similarly, the Bhajan Lal family, once a formidable political force, has seen its influence wane. The family’s current stronghold is limited to the Adampur assembly seat, where Bhavya Bishnoi, the grandchild of former chief minister late Bhajan Lal, is the MLA. Kuldeep Bishnoi and his son Bhavya Bishnoi switched from Congress to BJP in 2022.

Despite this shift, the Bishnoi family’s influence has steadily declined. Bhavya Bishnoi’s attempt to contest the Hisar parliamentary seat in 2019 on a Congress ticket ended in third place with around 15% of the vote. Local journalists attribute the family’s decline to their frequent shifts in allegiance.

Initially forming the Haryana Janhit Congress (HJC) in 2007, which was later merged into Congress under Kuldeep Bishnoi’s leadership in 2016, and subsequently moving to BJP in 2022, the Bishnoi family’s continuous realignments have led to diminished public faith and limited their influence to a single seat.

The Hooda family remains a dominant force

In the political landscape of Haryana, Bhupinder Hooda stands out as a towering figure whose influence remains significant even a decade after his tenure as Chief Minister. Serving from 2005 to 2014, Hooda was the first Chief Minister in Haryana’s history to win two consecutive terms.

His legacy includes transformative projects such as the Metro- Lane extension to Bahadurgarh and Gurugram, and also the “Padak Lao, Pad Pad Pao” (Bring a medal, get a government job), which continue to be remembered fondly by residents. Despite a decade away from the state’s top office, Hooda’s sway extends across various castes and regions, reinforcing his position as a major political force.

In the most recent parliamentary elections, Hooda’s strategic skill was evident. He played a crucial role in distributing nearly all of the Congress party’s tickets, with only two or three exceptions. This maneuvering resulted in his camp securing victories in four key parliamentary constituencies – Sonipat, Rohtak, Ambala, and Hisar – demonstrating Hooda’s enduring influence not only in his traditional strongholds but across Haryana as a whole.

During my recent visit to Haryana’s Jat-dominated regions of Rohtak, Jhajjar, Sonipat, Hisar, Jind, and Panipat, I observed that Hooda’s popularity surpasses mere party affiliation. In Dayal Chowk, Sonipat, I spoke with a local fruit vendor named Kapil, who remarked, “In Haryana, Congress is synonymous with Hooda. If he were to leave the party, Congress might struggle to survive. That’s how significant Hooda’s popularity is.”

Adding a new dimension to Haryana politics, Deepinder Singh Hooda, Bhupinder Hooda’s son and a four-time MP from Rohtak, has been increasingly prominent. In the recent parliamentary elections, Deepinder secured one of the highest victory margins after Rahul Gandhi.

Under his leadership, the Haryana Congress has launched the “Haryana Mange Hisab” Yatra, a statewide campaign addressing pressing issues such as unemployment, irregularities in the Parivar Pehchan Patra, Agniveer recruitment, drug addiction, and alleged corruption scandals from the past decade of BJP governance.

I attended one of the Yatra’s events in Ambala, where the reception was overwhelmingly positive. Attendees voiced their belief that the Yatra transcends party politics, representing a genuine response to the public’s concerns. Karamveer Chaudhary, who travelled from Kalka assembly to join the event, noted that while people hold hope for Deepinder Hooda, they continue to hold Bhupinder Hooda in high regard due to his past achievements.

Deepinder Hooda, often referred to as Junior Hooda, is recognised for his active engagement and direct interactions with the public. This approach contrasts with his father’s more reserved style, contributing to his growing acknowledgment and support among both younger and older generations.

While Bhupinder Hooda’s legacy remains a powerful force in Haryana politics, Deepinder Hooda’s rising prominence suggests a dynamic shift within the Congress party, reflecting a blend of respect for the past and optimism for the future. Hooda’s influence continue to dominate the state at a time when the other prominent political families of Haryana seem to confined to one or two assembly seats.

Aamir Shakil is a political researcher based in Delhi.

At INLD Mega Rally, Opposition Leaders Once Again Make the Case for Unity

Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar said that a “main front” of opposition parties will ensure that the BJP loses badly in the 2024 general elections.

New Delhi: A host of opposition leaders on Sunday made the case for opponents of the BJP to unite, with Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar reiterating his belief that ‘one front’ that includes the Congress and Left parties must take on the saffron party.

Several leaders participated in a mega rally organised by the Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) in Haryana’s Fatehabad to mark former deputy prime minister Devi Lal’s birth anniversary.

Addressing the rally, Nitish said that a “main front of opposition” will ensure that the BJP loses badly in the 2024 general elections.

“If all non-BJP parties unite, then they can get rid of those who are working to destroy the country,” he said. He accused the BJP of trying to create “Hindu-Muslim disturbances” in society to benefit politically.

There is no real Hindu-Muslim conflict in society, he said, adding that some mischief-makers are there everywhere. A large number of Muslims chose to remain in India after the Partition in 1947, he added.

Kumar suggested that an opposition front cannot be envisaged without the Congress and the Left parties, and urged leaders on the dais, including some with a strong anti-Congress history, to work for larger unity.

INLD leader Om Prakash Chautala, Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)’s Sukhbir Singh Badal, both with a long history of fighting the Congress, were on the stage with other senior leaders such as the Nationalist Congress Party’s Sharad Pawar, CPI(M)’s Sitaram Yechury and Arvind Sawant of the Shiv Sena.

However, no one from the Congress attended the rally.

Kumar asserted that the need of the hour is a “main front” of all opposition parties and not any third front, a reference to non-BJP and non-Congress parties. “Then such a front will win handsomely,” he said.

While leaving the rally venue, Kumar told reporters he was not a contender for the prime minister’s post.

“No real work is happening under the BJP government at the Centre,” he alleged, accusing it of imposing its control over different institutions, including the media, to peddle a “one-sided” narrative.

People attend a rally organised by Indian National Lok Dal on the occasion of the 109th birth anniversary of former deputy PM Devi Lal, in Fatehabad, September 25, 2022. Photo: PTI/Atul Yadav

‘Everyone must work towards ensuring change in 2024’: Pawar

NCP supremo Sharad Pawar, speaking at the rally, said the time has come for everyone to work towards ensuring a change of the government at the Centre in 2024.

“Farmers staged protests on the borders of the national capital, but the Union government did not heed to their demands for a very long time,” Pawar said.

Pawar said farmers and youths dying by suicide is not a solution, but the “real solution” is to bring about a change and everyone must strive for a change of the government at the Centre in 2024.

He said the Union government had promised to withdraw cases filed against farmer leaders, but it has not fulfilled it as yet.

Time to come together to form new alliance: Badal at INLD rally

SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal on Sunday joined the call for like-minded parties to form a united front under the flag of farmers and labourers and work for their welfare.

Talking about National Democratic Alliance (NDA), Badal said the alliance was formed when the BJP was relatively a weaker force.

“The real NDA is sitting here, it was founded by Shiv Sena, Akali Dal and JD(U). We stood by the BJP when it was a relatively smaller party. But now it is time to forge an alliance for farmers and labourers,” Badal said.

Badal attacked the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and said such parties destroy the entire state machinery when they come to power.

JD(U), SAD and the Shiv Sena left NDA to save constitution: Tejashwi

RJD leader and Bihar deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav on Sunday said the JD(U), SAD and the Shiv Sena left the BJP-led NDA to save the Constitution and democracy.

He also accused the BJP of making false claims and promises and dubbed the party as “Badka Jhuta Party” (party of big lies).

He said home minister Amit Shah spoke of an airport in Purnea in Bihar at his recent public meeting there even though there is no airport in the city.

With Nitish Kumar, Sukhbir Singh Badal and Shiv Sena MP Arvind Sawant on stage, he noted that they were all members of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA).

They have left the ruling alliance to save the constitution and democracy, he claimed. “Where is the NDA now?” he asked.

“While the Bihar government has begun the exercise to give jobs to people, the BJP government at the Centre has been unable to fulfil its promise of giving jobs,” he alleged.

Yadav said the BJP earlier used to sing ‘mehngayi daayan maar gayi‘ (price rise is killing everyone), but now mehngai has become its bhoujayi (sister-in-law).

(With PTI inputs)

30 Years On, Mandal Commission Is Still a Mirror for India

V.P. Singh sacrificed his political career but was determined to bring about social justice.

What is social justice? As India celebrates 30 years of the world largest affirmative action programme, Mandal Commission – and also the 89th birthday of V.P. Singh, my bubba (grandfather), who introduced it in the country – it is time to reflect on his sacrifice and the victory against the hegemony of caste elites, and perhaps get a glimpse into his vision for social justice. 

“Caste, for 5000 years, has been the basis of unbridled torture and ostracisation, now it has become the basis of justice,” Bubba’s unforgettable words echoed the Supreme Court’s verdict on India’s affirmative action program that gave 27% reservation to Other Backward Class (OBCs) in government jobs and later on in education too. But how did he understand this?

§

Born in 1931, in the royal palace of Daiya, he was soon adopted by the King of Manda, but the cloistered palaces didn’t stop our “modern Siddharth” (Acharya Vinoba Bhave gave him this title in 1956) from venturing into the villages to empathise with the depressed classes. 

He came from an India where birth defined who you were and then could become. Most of the backward castes had no means of education, nor any opportunity for economic upliftment. Despite living in independent India, the lower castes were still shackled to their wells, their hunger and a degraded life. Caste violence, sexual abuse and forced labour, were daily experiences for many rural, lower-caste families, as the upper castes pillaged their dignity to keep “them under control”. 

“India is perhaps the only place where the majority is oppressed and disfranchised by a minority,” he would say, commenting on the socio-economic foundations of the caste hierarchy. Since he was a child, he had seen this rampant subjugation and wanted to “break the chains”. 

Bubba found solace in books on science and philosophy – Gandhi, Plato, etc in his “favourite place in the world”, the banks of the river Belan. A young V.P. Singh, already a king at ten, with all the comforts of the world, was nudged by destiny towards renunciation and a tenacity for justice and truth. 

Instead of enjoying his royal life, he spent his twenties in social work – building roads, digging wells and organising inter-caste meals (which was shocking for the upper castes) in the Koraon area. Eventually, he invited Vinoba Acharya Bhave to bless his Bhoodan (gift of land) to the landless and inaugurate a school he had built. 

Also read: Remembering B.P. Mandal, the Man Behind India’s Silent Revolution

Before we come to the Mandal issue, we need to rewind to 1989 and understand the circumstances under which Bubba ascended to the prime ministership. It was a time when corruption was at a high, insurgencies in Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir and North-east were peaking, and the Indian republic, in an attempt to become an empire, had sent military forces into Sri Lanka. The economy was faltering as our external debt stood at 20% of GDP and foreign reserves were very low. The fatigue of the green revolution was evident, as farmers were heavily indebted; most of all, communal forces were fomenting hatred.

After exposing political collusion and bribery in various defence deals, he resigned from Rajiv Gandhi’s cabinet and was expelled from the Congress party. While the distance between him and the political elites grew, his fight for truth and his “Mr Clean” image endeared him to the people. They rewarded him by voting his Janata Dal into power; my grandfather became the prime minister.

Mustering up courage, I once asked him what the Mandal Commission was to him? And why did he implement it? In a soft voice, he had answered:

“The day I was sworn in, it was clear that the BJP would not allow the government to function beyond two years, as they wanted to run the government themselves. So I already knew that we would have to to work very hard to implement the promise in our manifesto to implement the Mandal Commission. It was the sole mission of my prime ministership, to free millions of Indians and their children from the clutches of an oppressive system and give them social justice. I had a duty to break status quo and free these people in India’s villages.”

In retrospect, political and upper-caste anti-Mandal commentators have conveniently overlooked the Action Plan of the Janata Dal, which was released in November 1989, which had clearly said: “A cabinet committee will be set up in January 1990 for consideration of the recommendations of the second Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission).”

File photo. B.P. Mandal submitting copies of the Mandal Commission report to Gyani Zail Singh, former President of India.

This was published across all major newspapers. And V.P. Singh kept that promise by appointing a committee under Devi Lal to look into the matter and announce the Mandal Commission by the budget session. But due to internal political differences over the election of Jat leader Om Prakash Chautala, Devi Lal’s son, and the exclusion of Jats from then report, Devi Lal stalled the report’s release. Post Devi Lal, Singh entrusted Ram Vilas Paswan with the job and gave him till August to deliver the report for implementation. Paswan completed the process by the end of July, and then, on August 7, 1990, V.P. Singh broke the oppressive, 5000-year-old power structures with a single ordinance. 

Also read: Why OBCs Hold the Key to the Future of Indian Democracy

This was the biggest social revolution after India’s independence. V.P. Singh’s sacrifice was like that of Prometheus, stealing fire from upper castes elites to empower the oppressed majority. A damning punishment followed for Singh. There were threats to his life, character assassination and allegations of political opportunism. But Bubba was unfazed. Much later, he would recall, “People now build their political careers on social justice, I sacrificed mine for it – do you think I cared for the whims of the one percent or for political power?”

He believed, and rightly so, that “releasing and implementing the Mandal commission report was the only way to integrate India, and heal caste wounds inflicted for over 5000 years.” For him, the Mandal Commission was a mirror for our society, and changed political power dynamics forever.

In 1996, he was offered the PM’s post again, but he refused with a poem:

Muflis se ab chor ban raha hoon mein
Par es bhare baazaar se
churaaun kyaa
Yaha vahi cheezei saji hain
jinhe lutaakar
main muflis ban chukaa hoon.

(From a pauper
I’m becoming a thief
But this grand bazaar is full of things I gave away
To become a pauper,
now what should I steal?)”

His 11-month old government finally fell when he arrested and foiled Lal Krishna Advani’s plan to demolish the Babri Masjid—another sacrifice for Mother India. But his fight for social justice didn’t end after his resignation. He made a pledge in Gorakhpur, that he would not return to Delhi until the Mandal commission report had been implemented across the country. He spent the next eight months going from state to state, addressing rally after rally, until the Supreme Court’s verdict upheld the ordinance.

“Violence, can never bring justice, and hate can never bring peace,” he would say when we talked about the upper caste unrest against him. Being the Prime Minister, he could use the state forces, and that too violently to suppress people, but he didn’t. A group of non-upper caste students visited him after the announcements. They were extremely angry at the anti-Mandal protesters.

Also read: Three Myths About Coalition Governments You Shouldn’t Believe

“The papers said all youth are against VP Singh, we are youth too; we represent 80% of them, OBC and minorities included, yet we are still not counted among them. When China and Pakistan, took our land, no one self-immolated themselves, but now when finally backwards caste students get an opportunity to dignified livelihoods and affirmative action they are protesting? We want to counter them in the streets too,” they said.

To this, he replied, “By choosing violence you will mirror your oppressors, so do nothing violent, but study and build your lives. Let them crucify me, if they want, you should not stray from the path of justice and truth”. This story was the final lesson in social justice. 

He would later remark, that the Mandal commission was never about imposing 27% or even 5% reservation, but about giving fair representation to the backward classes of India. It was about changing the social composition of India. In his vision, he wanted to even give reservations to economically backward upper-caste people, but that would require a constitutional amendment and appealed several times to double the opportunities for education and government employment.

V.P. Singh as the PM had a choice – to surrender to political elites and corporations or to destroy them. He chose the latter and his fight for social justice transformed India, and unshackled millions by ending caste-based apartheid. To his dying breath, he continued to be a voice for the voiceless.  

Indra Shekhar Singh is the grandson of V.P. Singh. He tweets @IndraSsingh.

Haryana Elections: What the Fight Is About in Bhupinder Singh Hooda’s Constituency

Hooda is seeking his third consecutive term to the Haryana state assembly from the Garhi Sampla Kiloi constituency in Rohtak district.

Rohtak (Haryana): Former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda is no stranger to tough opposition. A four-time MP, he thrice defeated former deputy Prime Minister Chaudhary Devi Lal from Rohtak. This time, Hooda is seeking his third consecutive term to the Haryana state assembly from Garhi Sampla Kiloi constituency in Rohtak district.

His opponent, once again, is Satish Kumar Nandal, whom Hooda had defeated by 47,185 votes in 2014 and by 72,100 votes in 2009. The big difference this time, however, is that Nandal – who contested the last two polls as a candidate from the Indian National Lok Dal – joined the BJP in June this year and has now been fielded as a candidate by the saffron party.

BJP hopes to repeat its Lok Sabha performance

After Arvind Kumar Sharma of the BJP wrested the Lok Sabha constituency of Rohtak in May this year from Hooda’s son and a former Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda by 7,503 votes, the BJP’s decision to throw its weight behind Nandal will make this election a closely contested one.

In fact ever since the BJP roped in Nandal as its candidate for the Garhi Sampla Kiloi constituency, Haryana chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar has often said that the world will remember the contest in this constituency.

The BJP is banking on the anger from non-Jats against Hooda due to the violence during the Jat reservation agitation of February 2016. It is also hoping that Nandal will be able to split the votes in the 24 Jat-dominated villages in the constituency since he is a local.

Also read: Haryana Politics Has Long Been the Arena of Dynasts and Turncoats

Many in the constituency believe that the election is going to be a closer contest than before but still give Hooda an edge. The BJP is not leaving anything to chance and most of the office-bearers at Nandal’s election office are not his INLD supporters from before but long-time BJP workers.

A bid to capitalise on anger of losses during Jat agitation

The office in-charge Satyanarayan said “the lower castes suffered during the quota agitation”. He said the shops and offices of a large number of Banias and Punjabis were burnt down or damaged during the quota stir and their anger would prove decisive. Some of the non-Jats blame Hooda and his aides for the violence. The arrest of one of Hooda’s aides, Professor Virender Singh, following the violence lent credence to this belief.

Hooda, who hails from the village Sanghi, has, in the past, enjoyed vast support in the 24 villages that are dominated by Jats. The BJP hopes that votes for Nandal, who belongs to Bor and is the president of a Jat association, would split support for Hooda significantly.

BJP candidate Satish Nandal’s office. Photo: Bazil Ashrafi/The Wire

Nationalism, support for armed forces remain key issues

Overall there are 226,009 votes in the constituency. Satyanarayan said, “BJP’s campaign is focussed around the issues of nationalism, greater procurement of equipment by the BJP for the Army and other forces, Prime Minister’s image in the comity of nations.” BJP says issues related to the armed forces draw significant support because nearly 70% of the families in the constituency have at least one member serving in the military.

Another BJP worker and media in-charge Pramod Kumar questioned as to why Hooda had not provided reservation to Jats during his ten-year rule and had only supported the Jat agitation towards the end of his term. BJP leaders have also cited a video of a former Hooda aide supporting the agitation to claim that the Congress was actively inciting violence.

BJP to overplay its support for reservation

Kumar said his party is telling people that it brought reservation for six castes – Jats, Jat Sikhs, Rors, Bishnois, Tyagis and Mulla Jat/Muslim Jat – through the Haryana Backward Classes (Reservation in Services and Admission in Educational Institutions) Bill, 2016 and Haryana Backward Classes Commission Bill, 2016. However, the high court stayed the law and the matter is now pending before the Supreme Court. He also insisted that of the 18 sub-divisional magistrate vacancies filled recently by the Khattar government, 18 were Jats.

Also read: Ground Report: What Women’s Safety Means in Poll-Bound Haryana

While BJP leaders are willing to discuss the quota issue, Nandal’s family members, who have turned up in large numbers, have chosen to avoid the topic altogether. Two of Nandal’s family members at his office in Rohtak said that they would not like to comment on the issue out of fear that the issue surrounding reservations could damage their interests in the Jat-dominated villages and within the community at large.

Khattar failed in maintaining law and order: Hooda

Earlier, speaking to The Wire, Hooda had blamed the Khattar government for failing to maintain law and order in the state several times. He said 84 people were killed in police action over the last five years, which was the highest ever for Haryana.

The Congress, however, is confident of a victory for Hooda in the constituency. Jaideep Dhankar, the party district president for Rohtak Rural, said that during his party’s rule all segments of the society were happy – be it farmers, labourers or business. “But under BJP’s Khattar regime everyone is in distress.”

‘Congress started AIIMS, IITs, IIM’

He also claimed that there was huge progress under Hooda’s term as chief minister. “We started AIIMS over 300 acres and two departments became functional in our time. In the last five years, they could not operationalise the remaining nine.” Likewise, he credited the Congress for bringing two IITs and an IIM – in Rohtak – to the state.

Addressing the BJP’s clamour surrounding “nationalism”, Dhankar said Hooda is the son of a renowned freedom fighter and hence did not need any certificates on nationalism from the BJP.

Also read: Social Engineering and Opposition Disunity Favour BJP in Haryana

Congress to highlight Khattar’s fickle nature, Prakash Singh report

The Congress, he said, is also laying emphasis on Khattar’s ‘fickle’ nature. “He got students, who were appearing for exams, and guest teachers lathi-charged. Khattar also told a close aide, who was riding with him atop a vehicle, that he would cut off his head. What kind of language is this?” Dhankar said.

Like Hooda, Dhankar too insisted that the Prakash Singh Committee report and the preliminary enquiry report of the CBI’s investigation into the quota violence be made public. “Why is the Khattar government hiding these?” asked Dhankar.

Watch | Shadow of 2016 Jat Quota Agitation Looms over Elections in Rohtak

In the run up to the 2019 assembly elections, there is still unease over the agitation which saw widespread arson and violence in many parts of the state.

In February 2016, widespread arson and violence took place in various parts of Haryana during the Jat reservation agitation. Properties worth over Rs 1,000 crore were destroyed in Rohtak city alone, where several automobile showrooms, other shops and business establishments of non-Jats were damaged and torched. Several hundred vehicles were also burnt.

Consequently, former chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda’s son and former MP Deepender Hooda lost the Lok Sabha election from Rohtak to BJP’s Arvind Kumar Sharma earlier this year. Now, in the run up to the assembly elections too, there is unease over the issue.

While both the BJP and the Congress are hesitant to talk about the incident openly, as they fear antagonising either Jats or non-Jats, people who suffered losses during those ten days of madness are not likely to forget the episode soon. The Wire spoke to a number of people about how they view the 2016 agitation and the kind of impact it could have on the upcoming assembly elections.

Haryana Politics Has Long Been the Arena of Dynasts and Turncoats

How will its chequered history play out in the assembly elections?

Haryana politics has often been regarded as the politics of aayaram and gayaram, that is, of people coming and going. Politicians change their affiliations as easily and quickly as their clothes. Thus every election in the state brings not only new leaders but also entirely new political organisations.

A look at the recent history of Haryana reveals that over the past two decades, only two parties have remained constant and material to the state’s politics in their original form – Congress and BJP. The former has been integral to a larger extent and the latter to a relatively smaller degree. Most other parties have changed their shape, names or affiliations.

Another crucial aspect of Haryana politics over the last five decades has been how prominent Congress leaders and former chief ministers have gone on to create dynasties of their own and floated their own political parties. These parties have, till this day, remained relevant, even though those leaders or their descendants may have later returned to their parent parties.

Also read: Ex-Haryana Chief Ashok Tanwar Quits Congress, Says Youth Leaders Are Being Eliminated

Interestingly, the trend set by three prominent former Congress leaders – Devi Lal (who became chief minister after leaving the party), Bansi Lal and Bhajan Lal (who rebelled and floated their own parties after becoming chief ministers) – was almost repeated recently by another former Congress chief minister, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, when he threatened to part ways if the ticket distribution did not happen his way.

Congress, weighed by the burden of its own experiences, relented this time and made him the legislative party leader and in-charge of the party’s election campaign.

Devi Lal

Devi Lal was a Jat leader of Sirsa district who was elected member of Punjab Assembly in 1952 and president of Punjab Congress in 1956. He had also played an active role in the formation of Haryana. He left the Congress in 1971 and never returned.

After being jailed for 19 months during Emergency, he became chief minister of Haryana twice – first as a Janata Party leader in 1977 and then, in 1987, as leader of Lok Dal, which he had formed. Lal also became deputy prime minister twice in the V.P. Singh and Chandra Shekhar governments between 1989 and 1991.

Haryana parties’ vote share through the years:

The INLD split

Devi Lal’s son Om Prakash Chautala became chief minister of Haryana four times.

He, along with his son Ajay Chautala, was charged in a recruitment scam of 2008 and convicted for 10 years. While Chautala’s elder son Abhay and Ajay stuck together till the 2014 Assembly elections, they later parted ways when Ajay’s son Dushyant Chautala formed the Jannayak Janata Party.

In this election, JJP is fighting as a separate entity. The INLD, under Abhay, has allied with the Shiromani Akali Dal, which is an alliance partner of BJP at the Centre.

Bansi Lal

Bansi Lal is the second of the three Lals who dominated Haryana politics. He served as chief minister thrice and was considered a close confidante of Indira Gandhi’s. He was also defence minister from 1975 to 1977 in her government and then, railway minister from 1984 to 1986, when Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister.

Bansi Lal left the Congress in 1996 and formed the Haryana Vikas Party. His main constituency, however, was Bhiwani. In the 1996 election, his party won 33 seats in the 90-member Assembly and formed the government with the help of BJP which won 11 seats.

Samata Party, which was a breakaway faction of Janata Dal and was led by socialists like George Fernandes, bagged 24 seats while the Congress won nine. He died in 2006, a year after his son Surender Singh was killed in a helicopter crash.

Surender was a minister in the Congress government at the time of his death. His wife, Kiran Chaudhary is a senior leader of the Congress, having served as Deputy Speaker and legislature party leader. She was replaced by Hooda as legislature party leader just before the announcement of the 2019 elections.

Bhajan Lal

Like Bansi Lal, Bhajan Lal was another Congress chief minister and former Union Minister who left the party and formed his own. He became chief minister thrice, in 1979, 1982 and 1991, served as Union agriculture minister and represented Adampur.

Also read: Ground Report: What Women’s Safety Means in Poll-Bound Haryana

After Congress made Hooda the chief minister following a victory in the 2005 elections, Bhajan Lal – who was a non-Jat and belonged to the Bishnoi caste – left the party and floated Haryana Janhit Congress. He won the 2009 Lok Sabha election on his own party symbol.

Following his death in 2011, his son Kuldeep Bishnoi kept the party alive. Bishnoi won the Adampur seat in the 2014 elections but merged his party with the Congress in 2016. He is now the Congress candidate from Adampur.

BJP’s graph

As for the BJP, it has seen its graph grow gradually in the state. The party formed its first government with a full majority in 2014 when it won 47 seats.

Also read: BJP Comes Out With Manifesto to Create ‘Ram Rajya’ in Haryana

Manohar Lal Khattar, who hails from Karnal and is a Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh member, was hand-picked as the chief minister by the party’s central leadership.

Under him, the BJP improved its tally in Lok Sabha elections in the state from seven in 2014 to a clean sweep of all 10 seats earlier this year.

The BJP is going into this election with the slogan of “Abki baar 75 paar” (‘This time, we will cross 75’). But a rejuvenated Congress under Hooda and new state unit president Kumari Selja, the newcomer JJP headed by former MP Dushyant Chautala and the changed dynamics of Dera, Jat and Dalit politics in the state pose a major challenge to its lofty ambitions.

How the River Waters Dispute May Change the Course of Punjab Politics

Elections in the state are less than a year away but a Supreme Court decision on the sharing of waters with Haryana may end up having major implications for all the parties in the fray.

Elections in the state are less than a year away but a Supreme Court decision on the sharing of waters with Haryana may end up having major implications for all the parties in the fray.

The river Satluj near Ropar. Credit: Harpreet Riat/Flickr CC 2.0

The river Satluj near Ropar. Credit: Harpreet Riat/Flickr CC 2.0

Chandigarh: The decades-long legal dispute between Punjab and Haryana on the sharing of river waters is back in the spotlight. This week, the Supreme Court resumed hearings on the validity of the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act.

With the Punjab elections less than a year away, this issue has the potential to change the political discourse in the state. This development may give political advantage to the Congress, as it is the party’s state chief, Capt. Amarinder Singh who passed the Act in question during his tenure as chief minister.

On the other hand, the Aam Aadmi Party, a new contender that is emerging as a major challenger to the Congress and the ruling Akali Dal-BJP alliance, may take some time to comprehend not just the ramifications of this new development, but the core issue itself, which has a violent and complicated history.

A brief history

Map of the rivers of undivided Punjab, circa 1890

Map of the rivers of undivided Punjab, circa 1890

The issue goes back to the creation of the state of Haryana.

After Partition, a dispute arose between India and Pakistan on the sharing of water from the rivers of undivided Punjab: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. In order to settle this, the two countries signed the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, under which both were allowed unrestricted use of three rivers each. India was allocated the eastern rivers – Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi.

Once this treaty was signed, the water from these three rivers was shared between Punjab, Delhi, and Jammu and Kashmir. Punjab was re-organised in 1966, and the state of Haryana was created out of it. As a successor state, Haryana was eligible to receive a share of Punjab’s river waters. The river Yamuna – whose course took it   through undivided Punjab but now flowed only in Haryana – was never considered a part of this arrangement.

Predictably, the sharing of river waters became a bone of contention between Punjab and Haryana. In 1976, Indira Gandhi intervened in the matter, ruling that of the available 15.2 million acre feet (MAF) water from the three rivers, Punjab and Haryana would receive 3.5 MAF each. With this, the seeds of trouble were sown.

Map of Punjab rivers and the proposed Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal. Credit: KBK

Map of Punjab rivers and the proposed Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal. Credit: KBK

In 1979, Haryana approached the Supreme Court to implement this allocation. Punjab filed a civil suit in the apex court a few months later, challenging it. These lawsuits began a slew of legal battles that continue to this day.

As it stands now, the core issue is the completion of the Sutlej Yamuna Canal which was meant to carry water from Punjab’s rivers to Haryana. Construction of the canal was halted in 1990, after militants gunned down a number of workers, the superintending engineer, and the chief engineer.

In 2002, the Supreme Court issued a directive to the Punjab government to complete the canal. To counter this, Capt Amarinder Singh, then the chief minister of Punjab, helmed the Punjab Termination of Waters Agreement Act, 2004, which was unanimously adopted by the Punjab assembly.

The Act annulled all earlier accords and awards on the apportionment of river waters between Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan, and provided statutory protection for the first time to the water already flowing to Rajasthan and Haryana. Within the state, the captain became known as ‘the Saviour of Punjab’s Waters.’

The role of the Akali Dal

On this issue, the role of the Akali Dal in general, and that of chief minister Parkash Singh Badal in particular, has always been ambiguous.

Badal became the chief minister of Punjab for the second time in 1977. The same year, his friend, Devi Lal took over as his counterpart in Haryana. It was under Badal’s regime that the design of the Sutlej Yamuna Canal was finalised, and the first notice for the land acquisition in order to build it was issued.

Years later, Akali Dal leader Jathedar Gurcharan Singh Tohra claimed that Badal had acquiesced to a suggestion from Devi Lal to jointly lay the foundation of the Sutlej Yamuna Canal. However, Tohra says he intervened and convinced Badal not to act on this. Later, Badal downplayed his involvement in the project by claiming that bureaucrats acting independently might have been responsible for beginning the process of land acquisition to build the canal.

The construction of the canal was eventually undertaken by the Akali Dal government headed by Surjit Singh Barnala in 1985.

Despite these associations with the canal, the Akali Dal’s Dharam Yudh Morcha in 1982 opposed its construction. This issue was ‘resolved’ under the Punjab Accord, signed between Rajiv Gandhi and Akali Dal president Harchand Singh Longowal. Construction resumed, only to violently come to a halt with the 1990 killings.

The current situation

The Punjab Termination of Waters Agreement Act, 2004, was referred to the Supreme Court by the President of India in that same year. Now, Haryana has petitioned the court to expedite the case.

The Narendra Modi government’s stand is that the enactment of this Act by Punjab violated two earlier Supreme Court judgments. Politically, this line threatens the BJP’s alliance with the Akali Dal in Punjab. The BJP is, of course, the ruling party in Haryana.

As for the Aam Aadmi Party, it is yet to understand the nuances of this issue and take a firm stand.

In case the Supreme Court rejects the Act passed by Capt. Amarinder Singh, the river waters will be on the boil again. This may well become the main issue in the upcoming state elections. Since it is Capt. Singh who is responsible for the Act, this would augur well for the Congress.

Incidentally, Capt. Singh had defied party chief Sonia Gandhi and then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s authority by not consulting them before enacting the legislation in 2004. Today, it seems, that act of rebellion might end up helping the party regain Punjab.