‘161 Applications Received for 8 Vacant Information Commissioner Posts at CIC’: RTI

At present the CIC is staffed with only the chief information commissioner and two ICs against the sanctioned strength of 10 commissioners.

New Delhi: The central information commission (CIC) has received 161 applications for 8 posts of information commissioners (ICs) lying vacant in the central government body, a Right to Information (RTI) query filed by transparency activist Commodore Lokesh Batra (retired) has revealed.

The CIC had invited applications for the posts in a notice dated August 14, 2024. At present, the CIC is staffed with only the chief information commissioner and two ICs against the sanctioned strength of 10 commissioners.

Regarding the process of appointment of the commissioners, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in its response said that information of the applicants will be tabulated and sent to a search committee constituted by the prime minister.

“All the names as well [as] shortlisted names (along with their applications) are sent to the Committee constituted under Section 12(3) headed by the Honourable Prime Minister.

Persons recommended by the Committee under Section 12(3) are appointed by the Honourable President. The Search Committee devises its own modalities for shortlisting the candidates,” the RTI response reads.

While Batra had also requested the name of the applicants, the DoPT said that “the concerned file is under submission to senior officer, therefore, list of names of applicants is not available with the CPIO at this stage” adding that this file can be accessed after the appointment process has been completed.

Section 12(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 stipulates that the chief information commissioner and information commissioners of the CIC will be appointed by a search committee comprising of:

(i) The prime minister, who shall be the chairperson of the committee;
(ii) The leader of opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha; and
(iii) A Union Cabinet minister to be nominated by the prime minister.

Batra, a veteran transparency activist, said that as per his knowledge the LOP is also provided with details of the applicants in advance, prior to the meeting of the high-powered selection committee chaired by the prime minister. “The message has to reach the LoP [Rahul Gandhi] that he has to do his homework prior to attending [the] meeting,” he said.

CIC, SICs chronically understaffed

In July 2024, the National Campaign for Peoples’ Right to Information (NCPRI) had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and LoP Rahul Gandhi expressing concern about the vacancies in the CIC.

“NCPRI is extremely concerned to note that the Central Information Commission (CIC) is functioning with only the Chief Information Commissioner and two information commissioners. Eight posts of information commissioners are lying vacant, even as the backlog of appeals/complaints currently stands at nearly 23,000 and is steadily increasing,” the letter dated July 26, 2024 said.

“It is extremely worrying that for several months the CIC has been functioning at a reduced capacity. This negates the very purpose of the RTI Act, which is to ensure time-bound access to information,” the letter said.

The NCPRI has also written to the chief ministers and LoPs of 12 states regarding vacancies in their state information commissions (SICs).

Five SICs are lying completely defunct. These include Jharkhand (since May 2020), Telangana (since February 2023), Tripura (since July 2021), Madhya Pradesh And Goa (since March 2024), NCPRI pointed out in its letter.

Several other information commissions are functioning with a large number of vacant posts despite having a significant backlog of appeals and complaints.

 

‘Vacant Posts, Backlogs at Information Commissions Extremely Concerning’: Activists Write to Govt

The National Campaign for Peoples’ Right to Information has written to Prime Minister Modi, LoP Rahul Gandhi and the chief ministers and LoPs of 12 states over vacancies in various information commissions.

New Delhi: The National Campaign for Peoples’ Right to Information (NCPRI) has written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and leader of opposition Rahul Gandhi expressing concern about the vacancies in the central information commission (CIC).

“NCPRI is extremely concerned to note that the Central Information Commission (CIC) is functioning with only the Chief Information Commissioner and two information commissioners. Eight posts of information commissioners are lying vacant, even as the backlog of appeals/complaints currently stands at nearly 23,000 and is steadily increasing,” the letter dated July 26, 2024 said.

Prime minister Modi is the chairperson of the selection committee, set up under Section 12(3) of the RTI Act, 2005, tasked with appointing information commissioners. Gandhi, as the Lok Sabha LoP, is also a member of the committee.

“It is extremely worrying that for several months the CIC has been functioning at a reduced capacity. This negates the very purpose of the RTI Act, which is to ensure time-bound access to information,” the letter said.

The NCPRI has also written to the chief ministers and LoPs of 12 states regarding vacancies in their state information commissions (SICs).

Five SICs are lying completely defunct. These include Jharkhand (since May 2020), Telangana (since February 2023), Tripura (since July 2021), Madhya Pradesh And Goa (since March 2024), NCPRI pointed out in its letter. 

Several other information commissions are functioning with a large number of vacant posts despite having a significant backlog of appeals and complaints. 

 

Karnataka’s SIC, functioning with only three commissioners and no chief, is facing a backlog of more than 40,000 cases. In Bihar, the SIC is operating with just two commissioners and a backlog of nearly 28,000 cases. The Chhattisgarh and West Bengal SIC have only two commissioners each and a backlog of about 17,500 and 10,000 cases respectively.

Rajasthan and Punjab SICs, both down to a single commissioner, have a backlog of around 9,000 cases each, while the Maharashtra SIC, functioning with six commissioners, is grappling with a significant backlog of more than 1 lakh cases, the rights group pointed out.

‘RTI becoming a dead letter’: Supreme Court

In October 2023, while hearing an application regarding vacancies in information commissions, the Supreme Court noted that “the state governments by failing to fill up the vacancies are ensuring that the right to information which is recognised under an Act of Parliament becomes a dead letter.” The court had directed “all states and the Union government to immediately take steps for filling up the vacancies in the posts of Information Commissioners in the SICs and CIC respectively”.

“In its February 2019 judgment, the Supreme Court observed that to ensure effective implementation of the Right to Information Act, it is imperative to have properly functioning information commissions with an adequate number of commissioners in accordance with the workload. The court had directed the Union and state governments to ensure timely and transparent appointment of information commissioners,” NCPRI said.

The RTI law is one of the most empowering legislations for the citizens of the country. It is used extensively by people, especially the poor and marginalised, to access information about their rights. Under the RTI Act, information commissions are the final appellate authority and are mandated to safeguard and ensure the practical realisation of people’s fundamental right to information, the letter notes.

“We urge you to ensure that the vacancies in the Central Information Commission are filled immediately by appointing information commissioners. Further, it must be ensured that the appointments are made in a transparent manner as per the directions given by the Supreme Court in its February 2019 judgment,” it added.

The letter has been endorsed by former CIC Shailesh Gandhi and prominent activists Anjali Bhardwaj, Nikhil Dey, Venkatesh Nayak and Rakesh Reddy Dubbudu among others.

 

Warrant Issued Against Haryana Official for Not Replying to RTI Query

Last month, a study by civil society groups said that while the RTI Act empowers information commissions to impose penalties against officers who deny or delay information, this power is used sparingly.

New Delhi: Less than a month after former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B. Lokur sought stringent punishment for officers who delay information under the Right to Information Act, the State Information Commission of Haryana issued a bailable warrant against an officer in Gurugram for not replying to a query on unauthorised colonies.

Taking a tough stand against the delay in providing information to RTI applicants, the SIC last month issued bailable warrants against the District Town Planner (enforcement) of Gurugram on a complaint by an applicant, Ramesh Yadav, who sought information on the no-objection certificates issued by the official concerned for registration of land and the action taken against mushrooming of illegal colonies.

The applicant alleged that the SPIO-cum-DTP (Enforcement) Ved Prakash Sehrawat issued around 250 NOCs in contravention of the law to facilitate coming up of unauthorised colonies. Yadav also claimed that in this way around 700 unauthorised colonies were allowed to come up in Gurugram.

Earlier, in August this year, the State Information Commission had directed Sehrawat to facilitate inspection of relevant records in the case at his office. But after Yadav complained to the commission via email on November 14 that he had not been provided with any information, the commission ordered the issuance of a bailable warrant against Sehrawat in the matter the following day.

The SIC order said Sehrawat “neither furnished any information to the appellant nor replied to the show cause notice” and asserted that “this shows the lacklustre attitude of SPIO”. Moreover, since Sehrawat also did not attend the commission hearings, it further noted that this “shows he has no regards for effective implementation of the RTI Act”.

Also read: Former SC Judge Seeks Punishment for Officers Who Delay Information Under RTI

It then posted the matter to March 11, 2020 while directing Sehrawat – who claimed that there was some miscommunication and that he had already furnished the reply to Yadav – to file his reply to the RTI application within two weeks.

Incidentally, last month, a ‘Report Card on the Performance of Information Commissions in India, 2018-19’ prepared by Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) and Centre for Equity Studies (CES) noted that commissions were usually “extremely reluctant to impose penalties on erring officials for violations of the law.” It stated that while the Act empowers information commissions to impose penalties of up to Rs 25,000 on erring Public Information Officers (PIOs) for violations, they have been found to be imposing them sparingly.

The report said “penalty was imposed only in 4% of the cases in which it was potentially imposable,” it said. In such a scenario, the order for issuing a bailable warrant against an erring PIO has sent across a strong message on compliance with the RTI Act norms.

Incidentally, soon after this ‘Report Card’ was released, a public meeting on the implementation of the RTI Act was organised by SNS where Justice Lokur said the testimonies of RTI users highlighted the importance of access to information in people’s lives. He said when an ordinary person is at fault, the government files a case and puts them in jail. But when a government officer (wrongfully) stops someone’s pension or is at fault, similar action is usually lacking.

He then urged the chief information commissioner Sudhir Bhargava to ensure that if complaints are received against officers, some penalty under the law should be imposed so that they know that wrongful acts will not go unpunished. The action by Haryana SIC is in line with that instruction.

Former SC Judge Seeks Punishment for Officers Who Delay Information Under RTI

Justice Madan B. Lokur also flagged the issue of rising vacancies in courts and information commissions.

New Delhi: On a day when his article, titled “Collegium’s actions show that the NJAC which was struck down four years ago is back, with a vengeance”, appeared in a national daily, former Supreme Court judge, Justice (Retd) Madan B. Lokur raised concerns about large number of vacancies in courts and information commissions impacting their functioning and speedy disposal of cases.

Speaking at a public meeting on the implementation of the RTI Act, organised by Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS), which recently also released the ‘Report Card of Information Commissions in India’ and another report on their orders, Justice Lokur raised the issue of vacancies in the commissions impacting their functioning. He said while there are about 350 commissioners, “a lot many vacancies too exist”.

‘Vacancies in courts too’

Likewise, Justice Lokur said, “In the courts too, a large number of vacancies of judges exist.” He said there was a news item in a Hindi newspaper on Wednesday which spoke about a delay in the appointment of judges. “There was a report that there is a shortage of 420 judges,” he said, as he went on to crack a joke around the number.

On a serious note, he then stated that until the vacancies in information commissions are filled, appeals would remain pending. “This would end up depriving people of the benefits of the [RTI] Act, which can be used to get access to various services and information. The government should, therefore, fill these vacancies at the earliest,” he said.

The meet was organised by the SNS to discuss various challenges being faced by the RTI law due to the way the commissions are functioning. It saw several testimonies from citizens who had used the law to access information regarding their ration, pension or other entitlements and problems.

Also Read: Wordplay Helps PMO Dodge Release of Details on Black Money, Corruption Cases Under RTI

Justice Lokur said the testimonies highlighted the importance of access to information in people’s lives. He said when an ordinary person is at fault, the government files a case and puts them in jail. But when a government officer (wrongfully) stops someone’s pension or is at fault, similar action is usually lacking, the former Supreme Court judge said.

Justice Lokur then urged chief information commissioner Sudhir Bhargava to ensure that if complaints are received against officers, then some penalty under the law should be imposed so that they know wrongful acts will not go unpunished.

‘RTI amendments can cause much harm’

Justice Lokur also said the recent amendments to the RTI Act could cause much harm. He said the advertisements issued for the posts of commissioners in the CIC earlier this year were without any disclosure on the tenure, salary, benefits and terms of service. “And the amendment which came a few months ago is also silent on these aspects. The rules have also not been framed as yet,” he said.

Justice Lokur also wondered if people who applied for these posts would still be interested in them. “They would be in the dark about the terms of service, their tenure and salaries. So they may not be keen on applying for or taking up these jobs now,” he said.

He said till the rules are framed, the RTI law will continue to suffer.

An SNS report being released. Photo: Twitter/@AnjaliB_

‘Mobile app, live telecast for greater transparency’

Justice Lokur also suggested that some mobile apps should be developed to keep the nearly 70 crore people who own phones to see if they are eligible for benefits under any given scheme.

Justice Lokur also noted that the Supreme Court has decided to telecast live court proceedings and urged the CIC to consider the same possibility, at least in cases that involve public interest.

He also called for better case management to ensure speedy disposal. “In the information commissions, 2.70 lakh cases are pending and so there is an urgent need to dispose of them quickly. If the decisions come after, say five years, then much of the benefit would be lost.”

Responding to the demands of Justice Lokur and other participants, CIC Bhargava said, “It is our aim and objective that people should get access to their right to information and to ask questions.”

Bhargava also enumerated steps taken by the CIC for better results. He said directions have been issued that irrespective of an applicant turning up for a hearing or not, the order would be delivered keeping her interest at the top. He added, “However, each case would be decided on its merit.”

‘PIOs take advantage of mala fide intent clause’

On the issue of PIOs delaying information, Bhargava said there are many high courts and Supreme Court orders which have to be adhered to. In the case of penalties, he said there are numerous instances where they can be imposed. “But there are clear court orders that till the mala fide intention of an information officer is proved or established, no penalty should be imposed. Officers take advantage of this because only in very few cases we can prove that there was a mala fide intent,” he said.

As for case management, Bhargava said efforts have been made by the commission to ensure that 10-15 cases are disposed by every commissioner each day, and about 90% of cases are disposed within a day or two.

Also Read: Do RTI Commissioners Have the Right to Information?

Anjali Bhardwaj of the SNS said people are facing a lot of problems in using the RTI Act. “Information Commissions are a friend of the citizens, they are institutions to provide information to the people. So the way we take to the streets to demand that appointments be made on time, so too we demand that the panels function properly and dispose the case at the earliest.”

And,” she asserted, “whenever there is a delay in delivery of information, a penalty should be imposed.”

Bhardwaj said that the SNS’s reports show that the penalty is being imposed only in 3% of the cases where applicable. “This is a matter of grave concern because officers will not fear the law,” she said.

She clarified RTI activists and users were “not in favour of penalties for the sake of penalties”. “We are interested in them because they are a way of ensuring proper implementation of the RTI law,” Bhardwaj said.