Home Ministry Recommends CBI Probe Against Oxfam India for FCRA Violations

According to the ministry, Oxfam India allegedly routed funds to the Centre for Policy Research through its associates and employees in the form of commissions.

New Delhi: The Ministry of Home Affairs on Thursday, April 6, recommended a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the affairs of Oxfam India for alleged violation of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, sources told news agency PTI.

According to the ministry, a survey carried out by the income tax department in September last year found “multiple emails” which revealed that Oxfam India was allegedly planning to circumvent provisions of the FCRA by routing funds to other FCRA-registered associations or through the for-profit consultancy route.

Oxfam India allegedly routed funds to the Centre for Policy Research (CPR) through its associates and employees in the form of commissions, PTI reported.

Following these findings, the home ministry recommended a CBI probe into the affairs of Oxfam India, they added.

The FCRA licence of Oxfam India, along with 5,933 non-government organisations, lapsed on January 1, 2022. The Union ministry had cited “adverse inputs” as the reason for revoking the licence. Several NGOs which work towards promoting human rights have lost their FCRA linceses over the past few years.

CPR’s license was recently suspended after the MHA claimed that the think tank was using the money for purposes other than the educational programmes, for which the licence was granted.

The income tax department had also conducted searches at CPR’s New Delhi office in September last year.

The Wire, in an analysis, had said that the I-T department’s notice to CPR prominently cites the latter’s ties with an NGO in Chhattisgarh that has been associated with protests against mining in Hasedo.

Interestingly, Hasdeo is the site of a massive Adivasi movement against the Adani Group for over a decade.

Meanwhile, the Union home ministry is also examining complaints against another NGO – The Other Media – for misusing foreign funds to organise protests and demonstrations around Vedanta’s Sterlite copper plant in Thoothukudi, in Tamil Nadu.

The protests claimed 13 lives and left several injured, after which the copper plant, owned by business baron Anil Agarwal, was shut down in 2018.

The Justice Aruna Jagadeesan Commission of Inquiry had accused top police officials of using “excessive lethal force” against protesters.

Officer Who Filed FIR Against Haryana CM Khattar Transferred

Officer had lodged a complaint regarding a missing file pertaining to a writ filed by the Bhupinder Hooda government against an enquiry panel’s findings on corruption charges and the Centre’s recommendations for a CBI probe.

New Delhi: Within days of his registering a first information report (FIR) against chief minister Manohar Lal Khattar on a missing file related to a high court case concerning whistleblower Indian Forest Service officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi, the Haryana government has transferred government officer Rajinder Singh Chhillar.

Though no reason has been given by the BJP government for Chhillar’s transfer to the animal husbandry division, it is widely believed that it has much to do with his action on the missing file. The file pertained to a writ petition filed by Congress leader and former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda in March 2014 against the report of a two-member enquiry committee, which had indicted him, some ministers and bureaucrats for corruption. Through the writ, Hooda had also opposed all subsequent action by the Central government, which included directions to the Haryana government to recommend a CBI probe into the matter.

File returned from CM’s office without notings

In May 2016, the advocate general’s office had recommended withdrawal of Hooda’s writ petition, terming it as inappropriate and not justifiable. Subsequently, the file, along with the opinion of the advocate general, was sent to Khattar, but when it was received back in the office of the additional chief secretary of the state forest department, the entire note sheet and many correspondences were found missing.

Congress leader and former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda’s government had then turned down the Centre’s directions to hand over the investigation of corruption cases exposed by Chaturvedi to CBI. Credit: Facebook

The office of additional chief secretary had then registered a case against the CM’s office, stating that it had discovered that the “original file noting and some correspondence pertaining to the file has been misplaced”.

In his complaint to the Chandigarh police on May 21, Chhillar had mentioned that the file pertained to a civil writ petition. He stated that “the main file pertaining to CWP No. 5953/2014 titled as State of Haryana and Principal Chief Conversation of Forest Vs. Union of India, was submitted by the office to Hon’ble CM for taking the decision to withdraw the said writ”.

The additional chief secretary’s office had recorded that when the file returned from the chief minister’s office on March 15, 2018, it had no original file notings that were sent to the CM’s office at the time of submission. The complaint also mentioned that the file was seen by the principal secretary to the chief minister on March 7.

Sensing the gravity of the matter, the office of the additional chief secretary (forest), on April 25, decided to lodge an FIR. The decision was taken following a discussion between the secretary and additional chief secretary, forest. It was decided by the department that efforts would be made to locate the missing file but “if such efforts do not result in locating the missing file, then an FIR to this effect should be registered.” The order had further read: “Quick action into matter please.”

Enquiry committee had indicted Hooda, others

The file was important as it pertained to cases of corruption exposed by Chaturvedi. The writ petition had been filed by the Haryana government in the Punjab and Haryana high court in March 2014 for quashing the report of a two-member enquiry committee constituted by the Centre in September 2010. The committee’s report had indicted Hooda, the then forest minister Kiran Chaudhary, then principal secretary (forest) Keshni Anand Arora and other politicians and bureaucrats for their alleged role in various corruption cases exposed by Chaturvedi.

Ironically, Chhillar’s transfer order, dated June 13, has been issued by Arora, who is now additional chief secretary and financial commissioner. This itself has created a situation where a lady officer indicted in a matter is issuing the transfer orders of another officer who has filed a complaint in that matter.

Last month, IAS officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi sent a protest letter to chief minister Khattar alleging that his government had been hijacked by certain corrupt bureaucrats. Credit: PTI

The two-member panel had also recommended a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against those indicted. Based on its recommendations, the President of India had quashed a departmental chargesheet pending against Chaturvedi in January 2011. This presidential order was implemented by the Haryana governor through a notification in February 2011.

Congress government turned down Centre’s directions

The Hooda government had turned down the Centre’s directions to hand over the investigation of corruption cases exposed by Chaturvedi to CBI. At that time the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which was then in the opposition, had supported Chaturvedi and had demanded a CBI investigation into the panel’s findings. It had also disrupted Assembly proceedings over the issue in March 2012.

After the Hooda government’s refusal to hand over the investigation to CBI, Chaturvedi had moved the Supreme Court in November 2012. Subsequently, notices were issued. In March 2014, the Hooda government filed a writ in the high court against the enquiry panel’s report and all subsequent actions of the Central government.

BJP changed stance under Khattar

In May 2016, the advocate general’s office advised the Khattar-led BJP government to withdraw the case and this advice was even recorded in the proceedings of the high court on May 30, 2016. However, when the case was not withdrawn by the Khattar government, Chaturvedi sent a complaint to the governor in November 2017, alleging that the notification issued by his office regarding quashing of the chargesheet in February 2011 was concealed by the state government in the writ petition to help certain corrupt elements. On his complaint, the governor sought a report from the chief secretary on November 23, 2017.

On March 1, this year, Chaturvedi filed an RTI application in various offices of the Haryana government seeking information regarding the status of the decision taken on recommendation sent by advocate general’s office for withdrawal of the case, regarding reports sent by the chief secretary to the governor on his complaint, and all other documents related to the filing of this writ petition and engagement of private counsels.

Initially, the office of the additional chief secretary, forest department, intimated him that the records were not traceable and were being searched for. After that, Chaturvedi sent a protest letter to Khattar last month alleging that his government had been hijacked by certain corrupt bureaucrats. He had also demanded a CBI investigation into the missing files.

Note: This article was edited as the FIR was filed Khattar, not his office. In addition, Rajinder Singh Chhillar was erroneously referred to as a forest officer.

No Leads in 6 Months Since Manipuri Student was Cremated by Noida Police

Upset with Noida police’s ‘lackadaisical’ attitude, the family of 22-year-old Pravish Chanam refuses to collect ashes, awaits CBI probe.

New Delhi: It has been six months since Manipuri student Pravish Chanam mysteriously died after he disappeared from a music concert in Noida. Yet, his family refuses to pick up his ashes from Shavdah Griha Antim Nivas, where he was cremated four days after the 22 year-old student’s body was found in Murga Market, sector 31.

On September 8, Pravish had gone to Knowledge Park to catch the band, Chainsmokers, along with three friends, also from Manipur. The next day, his older brother, Ravi Kant Chanam, a resident of Vijaynagar in North Delhi, received a call from Pravish’s number but it was one of his friends, Ashok, on the line, who reported that Pravish went missing from the concert venue, leaving his cell phone and wallet behind for safe keeping. After going through a harrowing ordeal of filing a missing persons report in the Knowledge Park police station and a series of follow-ups, Ravi learned that his brother was not only found dead but also cremated by the Uttar Pradesh police.

“The police cremated two bodies that day without properly marking either. So we don’t know whose ashes we will be collecting”, said Ravi. Although Pravish’s last rites were completed on September 16 in Imphal, Manipur, the family has vowed to rest only after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conducts an inquiry. Despite repeated requests to send the clothes his brother was found in for laboratory tests, Ravi is yet to receive an update on the case.

Ravi said his family has given up all hope on the Noida police cracking the case, partly because of their lackadaisical attitude. To appeal for the case to be transferred to CBI, they met several officials, including home minister Rajnath Singh and his deputy, Kiren Rijiju, as well as Manipur chief minister Biren Singh. Apart from this, protest rallies were organised in Delhi and Imphal.

In January 2018, Uttar Pradesh chief minister Adityanath wrote to the home minister informing him that the case was ordered for transfer from sector 20 Noida police station to CBI for investigation. Not only that, the UP government issued an order, “according consent to the member of the Delhi Special Police Establishment in the whole of the State of Uttar Pradesh for investigation” in this case (a copy of which has been accessed by this reporter).

Despite official instructions in this case, the CBI is yet to commence investigation. “The case is not registered with us”, the chief information officer at the CBI told this reporter. When asked for a reason, he said, “CBI takes a call on cases to be registered based on its own norms and evaluation”.

Rijiju said the CBI was engulfed in several cases referred to them. “They also have limitations, like manpower. I’m personally very upset that this case did not move in the direction that we would like to see, because it’s a huge tragedy”, he told this reporter in an interview held earlier. He said all the short-term recommendations of the Bezbaruah Committee report from 2014 had been implemented by the government.

A vigil in the memory of Pravish Chanam at Delhi University. Credit: Facebook/Manipur Times

A vigil in the memory of Pravish Chanam at Delhi University. Credit: Facebook/Manipur Times

Among other changes, the Bezbaruah Committee recommended empowering the North East Special Police Unit to have the power of a police station to register cases and provide directions to various police stations in cases related to people from the region. While a functioning North East cell in New Delhi has been established, Rijiju claimed that every city now has a special cell for NE people. “Police is for everybody. Can you imagine a police station in Imphal or Itanagar for people of Bihar or UP? You can’t just cross the limit of the provisions of the law or the system”, he added.

The Bezbaruah Committee was set up following the murder of a 19-year-old student, Nido Tania, the son of a Congress MLA from Arunachal Pradesh. Many such cases are routinely covered by the media, but do not cause that level of outrage, said Liyi Marli Noshi, a lawyer from Arunachal Pradesh who practices in Delhi’s Saket court. “Every day, cases like Nido Tania are happening but to bring media attention to it, a person has to be from a rich family”, said Noshi, one of the North Eastern lawyers empaneled for legal assistance, as per the committee’s recommendation.

The Chanam family has suspected foul play since day one, given several inconsistencies in the versions of the police and government district hospital. The investigating officer, SHO Anil Kumar Shahi told the media in September that Pravish died of drug overdose, as per the post- mortem report. However, the post-mortem report clearly states “shock and haemorrhage due to head injury” as the cause of death.

It should be mentioned that while the report says “eye bulging and bloated face”, no trace of drugs were found. The medico legal report filed by the hospital on the day of departure mentions “alcoholic smell present in the breath” and “seizure like movement of person at the time of admission” apart from a recent injury “caused by hard and blunt object, simple in nature”. Moreover, the report (prepared at 4.30 p.m on September 11, 2017) states that the body was “about 2 to 3 days old” at the time of conducting the post-mortem. “Why did the hospital wait for two days to conduct the post-mortem?”, Ravi wondered.

The Chanam family has suspected foul play since day one, given several inconsistencies in the versions of the police and government district hospital. Credit: Facebook/Pravish Chanam

At sector 20 police station, a police official told this reporter that the inquiry in this case was going on, which is documented in a progress report every month. SHO Manish Saxena, the present IO appointed to the case, said he was transferred to the PS only this month and the previous IO would be better placed to comment. Despite several attempts to contact Anil Kumar Shahi, who became SSP after former SSP Luv Kumar moved to Lucknow as DIG, Prisons, did not respond to queries. In September, Kumar suspended three police officials and shunted the SHO at Knowledge Park PS to police lines for dereliction of duty.

Strangely, in the CBI proforma (a copy of which has been accessed by this reporter) the UP government states that “the investigation is still pending and no substantial progress could be made till now”. However, in justifying the case to be referred to CBI, they mention, “a possibility that persons from native state of deceased or neighbouring state like Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan etc. are behind this crime”.

It’s unclear why the government ruled out the possibility of people from Uttar Pradesh being involved since Pravish’s body was recovered in Noida. Ravi, however, says the friends who accompanied Pravish on the day of the concert have not been seen after September 11, when they accompanied him to the Knowledge Park PS.

“On September 13, all his friends (except those who were with him) came to the station to figure out his whereabouts. None of the three ever provided information to any of the police stations. They didn’t even contact us after we found out that he was no more or attend his funeral”, Ravi said, unable to mask his suspicion. Despite attempts to contact Ashok, he was not reachable.

As per the CCTV footage that the police handed to the family (accessed by this reporter), Pravish can be seen walking out barefoot from the hospital at 7.30 a.m the morning after he was admitted. The CCTV footage from Noida Stay, about 900 meters away from the hospital, shows him walking under the flyover. However, the footage has a time lapse of 81 seconds in the video, after which Pravish disappears from the frame. How did he manage to reach the Murga Market, which is a good 15-minute walk  (as per Google maps) in his condition, remains a mystery.

As the family keenly waits for the CBI to initiate an inquiry into the case, so far handled with ‘utmost negligence’, the silence of the authorities and the dodging of questions related to the case indicate that a breakthrough may still not be on the horizon. In fact, it is likely to further drag on, caught in bureaucratic red tape.

Makepeace Sitlhou  is a freelance journalist based in Guwahati.