Mental Health in Academia: What About Faculty Members?

The hypercompetitive academic culture has ways of always keeping you on your toes.

The life of a professor is a constant balancing act where we try to juggle personal and professional responsibilities under the pervasive stress of managing expectations in an often hypercompetitive culture. There is always a fear that we may drop the ball, a sense that if that were to happen, we would be alone and the only one to blame. The system assumes that we should be old enough, experienced enough, and tough enough to withstand all the pressure that comes with the job. Being a faculty member in a university can be one of the most fulfilling career paths, but it has also become one of the most stressful jobs.

The storms of academia

As young scientists taking on a faculty position, we quickly transition from being a team member to a team leader; from never worrying about securing funding to being overwhelmed with grant deadlines; from managing a single project to planning and guiding the work and careers of several students and post-docs; from worrying about ourselves to being absorbed in worrying about everything except our wellness. The great majority of us have never developed a course or taught classes on our own, yet we are all expected to assume these responsibilities.

Many universities give good support when it comes to teaching, yet most offer very little training or help in project and team management, leadership, mentoring and conflict resolution, let alone mental health awareness and intervention. We are expected to learn everything on the job. In other words, we learn by making mistakes that we – and to some extent our students and staff – directly or indirectly end up paying for. Driven by our passion for science, we keep trying and do get better at it, but very rarely pause to assess: “At what cost?”

As the tenure clock starts ticking, stress and anxiety often begin to increase; the stakes become higher, and many begin to struggle with the ambiguity of the tenure criteria and the lack of feedback. The pressure mounts to publish papers in ‘high impact journals’, to secure prestigious grants, go on lecture tours, and fill in all the blanks in our CV. Frustration, disappointment, self-doubt or burnout are all too common throughout this journey.

Also read: What Is it About Working in STEM Labs That Increases Anxiety, Depression Risk?

Even after tenure, the pressure often does not go away. Instead, we simply transition from one type of stress to another: from being anxious about publishing and securing tenure to being worried about funding, deadlines, increased administrative duties, the pressure to secure more prestigious grants and awards, and concerns for our reputation. The hypercompetitive academic culture has ways of always keeping you on your toes. For senior faculty, the definition of success is a constantly moving target that is shaped and reshaped by the achievements of our peers and the expectations of our superiors. After achieving tenure, success becomes much harder to define, especially because the more senior we get, the less feedback we receive. What remains constant, however, is the lack of acknowledgement that faculty may be struggling, and the absence of formal or informal support from our institutions.

We constantly preach that failures provide unique learning opportunities and are the stepping stones for success. But when it comes to our own careers, many of us may feel that failure is never an option or something that we are willing to accept, admit or share. Academia is also not the place where we are likely to get second chances. Our peers may view our failure less as a potential learning experience and more as a sign that we are not fit for academia. In a culture of perfectionism and nearly constant peer pressure, the lines between disappointment and failure become very blurry.

Most of us quickly learn that we must project an image of always being in control and unshaken by all the storms of academia. We feel the need to ‘fake it’ until (hopefully) we make it. In reality we, like our students, frequently experience stress, fear and insecurity as well as anxiety, depression and burn out. As faculty, many believe that admitting we are stressed or going through a mental health crisis would be a mistake; that if we do, no one will see us the same way, and that it may compromise our relationship with our students, our colleagues and our superiors. In the absence of a collegial and supportive culture, and with many professors spending most of their time in their office only surrounded by computers, a faculty position can be emotionally, mentally and physically draining. It should not be this way, and no one should suffer alone.

Too high a price to pay

Often, we do not realise until it is too late that poor work-life balance and pretending that we are on top of everything comes at a great cost to our health, wellbeing and our families. Pressure, stress and anxiety frequently translate into sleep deprivation, exhaustion, irritability and isolation, all of which negatively affects our quality of life and our interactions with students and colleagues. Chronic stress is also a major risk factor for developing many psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders: I have come to learn this first hand after suffering two heart attacks during the past three years.

We have to equip new postdocs and faculty with the necessary resources and training to manage their new responsibilities, navigate the pre-tenure period and handle their mental health challenges. I am happy that my university – The Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne – has started to recognise and prioritise more professional training and support for faculty, but more work is still needed. As a community, we need to pause, reflect and work together to systematically assess why faculty, but also students and staff in our universities, experience so much stress and so many mental health problems. This, and normalising the conversation about mental health, are crucial steps to tackling the mental health crisis in our campuses.

While researching the topic, writing and reflecting on my experiences, I realised that there are many things that I could have done differently; I wish I’d had the courage to admit that I was not a superhuman, to seek help to handle my mental health and the daily struggles to achieve work-life balance. From how I managed my time, job expectations and my wellbeing to how I failed at times to fulfil my responsibilities towards my family, I learnt there is no such thing as suppressing your feelings or hiding your struggles. If you do not deal with them, they linger in your head, mess up your sleep pattern, impact your health, and affect the lives of people around you. I regret not taking the time and initiative to seek the assistance of experts and to follow structured training programs that could have helped me with my new responsibilities and to manage my mental health and support my students and colleagues.

Also read: In India, IITs’ Decision to Use Tenure to Improve Research Could Backfire

But it is never too late: this is exactly what I am doing now. I have come to terms with the fact that balancing my life with my work means saying “no” more, traveling less, prioritising my health and family, and giving up on trying to please everyone or do everything that can be done. To make more time for myself, my family, my research and my students and group members, I have decided to start by reducing the size of my team, by giving up certain grants and by further consolidating our research programs. I am now more comfortable opening up and discussing my own difficulties with team members and colleagues. I am also more sensitive to the struggles of those around me, and having them share their mental health challenges has been equally therapeutic. At the community level, I plan to organise a series of lectures and activities in 2020 to help normalise the conversation about mental health on campus. I would like to advocate for joint community-based initiatives that create an environment where people struggling with stress and mental health issues feel supported and are not afraid to be excluded.

I hope this article will help others in academia feel comfortable speaking out about their struggles and mental health challenges, and sharing their thoughts, feelings and experiences. As faculty, we cannot take care of our students if we do not learn how to take care of ourselves.

Hilal A. Lashuel is an associate professor and director of the Laboratory of Molecular and Chemical Biology of neurodegeneration in the Brain Mind Institute at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.

This article was originally published by eLife and has been republished here on a Creative Commons Attribution license.

Are You Burnt out at Work? Ask Yourself These Four Questions

This ‘occupational phenomenon’ does not discriminate based on your job. No matter what you do, extreme stress may cause burnout and here’s what you need to know.

It’s normal to feel stressed at work from time to time. But for some people, the stress becomes all-consuming, leading to exhaustion, cynicism and hatred towards your job. This is known as burnout.

Burnout used to be classified as a problem related to life management, but last week the World Health Organisation re-labelled the syndrome as an “occupational phenomenon” to better reflect that burnout is a work-based syndrome caused by chronic stress.

The newly listed dimensions of burnout are:

  • feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion
  • increased mental distance from one’s job, or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one’s job
  • reduced professional efficacy (work performance).

Also read : Pyt: A Danish Word to Combat Stress


In the era of smartphones and 24-7 emails, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to switch off from the workplace and from those who have power over us.

The new definition of burnout should be a wake-up call for employers to treat chronic stress that has not been successfully managed as a work health and safety issue.

How do you know if you’re burnt out?

If you think you might be suffering burnout, ask yourself the following questions:

  1. has anyone close to you asked you to cut down on your work?
  2. in recent months have you become angry or resentful about your work or about colleagues, clients or patients?
  3. do you feel guilty that you are not spending enough time with your friends, family or even yourself?
  4. do you find yourself becoming increasingly emotional, for example crying, getting angry, shouting, or feeling tense for no obvious reason?

If you answered yes to any of these questions, it might be time for change.

These questions were devised for the United Kingdom Practitioner Health Programme and are a good starting point for all workers to identify if you are at risk of burning out.

(You can also complete the British Medical Association’s online burnout questionnaire, although it’s tailored for doctors so the drop-down menu will ask you to select a medical specialty).

If you think you’re suffering burnout, the first step is to talk to your line manager or workplace counsellor. Many workplaces now also have confidential external psychologists as part of their employee assistance programme.

What causes burnout?

We all have different levels of capacity to cope with emotional and physical strains.

When we exceed our ability to cope, something has to give; the body becomes stressed if you push yourself either mentally or physically beyond your capacity.

People who burn out often feel a sense of emotional exhaustion or indifference, and may treat colleagues, clients or patients in a detached or dehumanised way. They become distant from their job and lose the zeal for their chosen career.

They might become cynical, less effective at work, and lack the desire for personal achievement. In the long term, this is not helpful for the person or the organisation.

While burnout isn’t a mental health disorder, it can lead to more serious issues such as family breakdowns, chronic fatigue syndrome, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and alcohol and drug abuse.

Who is most at risk?

Any worker who deals with people has the potential to suffer from burnout. This might include teachers, care workers, prison officers or retail staff.

Emergency service workers – such as police, paramedics, nurses and doctors – are at even higher risk because they continually work in high-stress conditions.

A recent survey of 15,000 US doctors found 44% were experiencing symptoms of burnout. As one neurologist explained:

I dread coming to work. I find myself being short when dealing with staff and patients.

French research on hospital emergency department staff found one in three (34%) were burnt out because of excessive workloads and high demands for care.

Lawyers are another profession vulnerable to burnout. In a survey of 1,000 employees of a renowned London law firm, 73% of lawyers expressed feelings of burnout and 58% put this down to the need for a better work-life balance.

No matter what job you do, if you are pushed beyond your ability to cope for long periods of time, you’re likely to suffer burnout.

It’s OK to say no to more work

Employers have an organisational obligation to promote staff well-being and ensure staff aren’t overworked, overstressed, and headed towards burnout.

There are things we can all do to reduce our own risk of burnout. One is to boost our levels of resilience. This means we’re able to respond to stress in a healthy way and can bounce back after challenges and grow stronger in the process.


Also read: This Scandal Will Make You Reconsider Wellness Advice From Influencers


You can build your resilience by learning to switch off, setting boundaries for your work, and thinking more about play. As much as you can, inoculate yourself against job interference and prevent it from ebbing into your personal life.

No matter what your profession, don’t let your job become the only way you define yourself as a person.

And if your job is making you miserable, consider moving jobs or at least have a look at what else is out there. You may surprise yourself.

Michael Musker, Senior Research Fellow, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Featured image credit: Unsplash

Hustle Away: The Dawn of an Instagram Work Culture

With fewer jobs and more social media, millennial hustlers are celebrating a culture of work that pushes the limits of human endurance.

This is the second article on a two-part series on work culture. Read the first part here.

Co-working spaces have been able to monetise aspirational ‘worklife’ attitudes in a gig economy. In the new world of work, passions become paid work, steady careers are old fashioned and the college degree – once a straightforward pathway to ‘The Job’ – is not what it used to be.

Many gig jobs flow from social media; for everyone that uses Instagram for publishing a photograph for the sake of the photograph someone else is posting a happy work related announcement or evidence of creative productivity. Even if not everyone’s self-aggrandisement is economically motivated, in a shrinking job market, this is how many per force hustle for jobs.

In addition to staying active on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn etc, gig workers regularly work on multiple job fronts across a diverse client or platform base as insurance against the possibility of a lean month ahead. In this climate of fear of job insecurity, it’s not unusual for a freelancer to forego a holiday of at least a few days stretch for a couple of years.

Economies of population scale entail that one in every four freelance workers in the world is based in India. In software, this number rises to 50%. Significantly, they are millennials in their majority: 60% of freelancers in India are under the age of 40. Given the cost savings for employers of all kinds, including the government, who engaged gig workers in flagship projects – Digital India, Swatchh Bharat and Smart Cities – this figure is set to rise.

In contrast to regular employees, freelancers spend time left over after paid labour hustling for work. Oxford Internet Institute states that platform workers spend ‘an average of 16 hours a week of their own time searching for jobs, training or waiting for work’.

Also Read: The ‘Do What You Love’ Mantra and Co-Option of a Laborious Work Culture

The 18.2 million posts on Instagram using #hustle offer insight into the mindset gripping the gig economy. Here, inspirational quotes tell the people to hustle harder, dressing-up workaholism in new clothes.

‘The days that break you are the days that make you’ spells out the new norm: work harder. Millennial hustlers celebrate work that pushes the limits of human endurance.

For one Instagrammer, a job in sales: ‘made me realise that waking up at 3am and functioning is entirely possible, who would’ve thought’. Another sees Friday as an untapped source of human optimisation: ‘Happy Friday to those that hustle like it’s Monday, believe in themselves, chase their dreams and see their own potential’. The millions of posts can be summed up in one three word post: ‘Dream hustle repeat’.

What seems lost on the millions who generate and like #hustle posts is the irony encapsulated in a post saying ‘97% of people who quit too soon are employed by the 3% who never gave up’. Not even a 100% conversion rate of ‘quitters’ to ‘non-quitters’ will change the small fractional number at the top of the economic pyramid. The notion of hustling has become so ingrained in the concept of work, especially in the very young, that an 18-year-old student, where I teach, concludes his report for a college course with motivational encouragement for the reader: ‘so keep hustling and keep working’.

With fewer jobs and more social media, extremist work attitudes are flourishing. An online ‘rise and grind’ work ethos gives cause to journalist Erin Griffith to complain that ‘Workplace indifference just doesn’t have a socially acceptable hashtag’.

Silhouettes of mobile users are seen next to a screen projection of Instagram logo in this picture illustration taken March 28, 2018. Credits: Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

Silhouettes of mobile users are seen next to a screen projection of Instagram logo in this picture illustration taken March 28, 2018. Credits: Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

In antithesis to the spirit animating 20th century labour movements organised around fair working hours and wages, the millennial worker is pingable at most times of the day and religiously believes in the gain that follows pain: ‘Don’t quit, suffer now, and prepare for glory’. Comments accompanying this and other such Instagram posts evoke a sense of butterfly effect: ‘keep pushing’ or ‘keep grinding it will be worth it’.

Also Read: Is a Life, Dominated in Every Moment by Work, Worth Living?

It’s no coincidence that WeWork premises around the world hang posters reminding patrons to ‘Respect the Hustle’ or that ‘Everyday I’m Hustlin’. When there is more competition, less jobs, more media, projecting love for what you do is an essential part of the hustle. In a caption for a post on WeWork’s Instagram account – ‘Action plan for March [2019]: do what you love’ – hustling meets loving what you do yet again.

The update includes a photograph of a WeWork coffee mug printed with the slogan ‘always do what you love’. The same DWYL (Do What You Love) mugs lined the walls, from floor to ceiling, of a WeWork booth at the India Art Fair in January. From a commercial side, love and work have proved a potent mix – WeWork has a current investor value of $47 billion.

Following the dot com bust in the early 2000s, big tech started gearing workplaces to longer working days with provisions ranging from in-house massage therapists to laundry facilities. I remember being really impressed back in 2010 when a friend working in Google described the pingpong tables, bean bags and free food at its Dublin headquarters. His office had far better creature comforts than most shared rented accommodations.

The house we were gathered in was a crumbling Georgian pile of a place with a shower that had to be regularly substituted with an electric kettle to warm water. My own shared let had mildewed kitchen walls and broken storage heaters. Casualties of the 2008 recession, we weren’t solvent enough to see through Google’s motives for keeping employees happy at work. WeWork and it’s ilk aren’t employers to the tens of thousands using their homey office spaces, but just like Google before them, they too are keeping people at work longer.

A ‘State of Working India 2018’ report places one in every six graduates as unemployed. Or put another way: ‘The number of people with a graduate or higher degree who are looking for a job is roughly equal to the entire population of the city of Bengaluru (population 8.5 million according to the 2011 census)”.

Also Read: Burnout, Stress Lead More Companies Around the World to Try Four-Day Work Week

With a formal work sector unable to provide jobs for an expanding labour force of college graduates, the growth of India’s gig economy is entirely logical. And while it brings economic benefits to many who need it, its shifting of paradigms and practices of work culture is worthy of attention. In the not-so-new-anymore gig economy, the 35-hour week and ‘pensionable job’ have become relics from an earlier stage of capitalism.

Unregulated external labour markets and gig to gig compensation brings the hustler out in even the most introverted platform worker. With competition for ‘new collar’ jobs, here and elsewhere, set to intensify, projecting love for what you do being an essential part of the hustle and technology, making ease of doing business at any time a reality, for a next generation of workers who are always ‘on’, off-time is increasingly difficult to pin down.

Let’s hope the working week of the future bears little resemblance to the 130-hour one eulogised by former Google star Marissa Mayer and no trace of her advise to workaholic aspirants: ‘[be] strategic about when you sleep, when you shower, and how often you go to the bathroom’.

Aileen Blaney is a faculty member at Srishti Institute of Art, Design and Technology and a co-editor of the book Photography in India: From Archives to Contemporary Practice.

Millennial Burnout: We Need to Overhaul How We Work

Building resilience is not the way to tackle burnout.

In a popular BuzzFeed article, Anne Helen Petersen describes how millennials (people born between 1981 and 1996) became “the burnout generation”. She describes some of the stark consequences of edging towards burnout and identifies what she calls “errand paralysis”, marked by a struggle to do even simple or mundane tasks.

Many of the factors contributing to this burnout are rooted in the challenging job and economic conditions that millennials face, according to Petersen. She also describes “intensive parenting” as a contributing factor, because millennials have been relentlessly trained and prepared for the workplace by their parents. They have internalised the idea that they need to be working all the time or engaging in the never-ending pursuit of self-optimisation.

Similarity to work burnout

Millennial burnout has a lot of similarities with regular burnout, otherwise known as work burnout. Burnout is a response to prolonged stress and typically involves emotional exhaustion, cynicism or detachment, and feeling ineffective. The six main risk factors for work burnout are having an overwhelming workload, limited control, unrewarding work, unfair work, work that conflicts with values and a lack of community in the workplace.

People who have to navigate complex, contradictory and sometimes hostile environments are vulnerable to burnout. If millennials are found to be suffering higher levels of burnout, this might indicate that they face more problematic environments. It is quite possibly the same stuff that stresses everyone, but it is occurring in new, unexpected or greater ways for millennials, and we haven’t been paying attention.

For example, we know that traditional social comparison plays a role in work burnout. For millennials, social competition and comparison are continually reinforced online, and engaging with this has already been shown to be associated with depressive symptoms in young people.

Even if you avoid social media, using technology and going online can be physically and emotionally exhausting. Excessive internet use has been linked to burnout at school. These are just some of the ways that millennials have been increasingly exposed to the same stressors that we know can negatively affect people in the workplace.

We know very little about how millennials experience burnout. Early research suggests there are generational differences. Specifically, millennials respond to emotional exhaustion (often the first stage of burnout) differently to baby boomers (people born between 1946 and 1964). When feeling emotionally exhausted, millennials are more likely to feel dissatisfied and want to leave their job than baby boomers.

Burnout research shows that complex environments and stressors, coupled with high expectations, create the conditions for traditional work burnout. The same can be said for the millennial burnout, which draws on similar notions of perfectionism.

Perfectionists, especially the self-critical ones, are at greater risk of burnout. Naturally, the self-critical type of perfectionist works hard to avoid failure, thereby putting themselves at high risk of burnout.

Resilience as protection

A recent approach to tackling work burnout is to train people to be more resilient. This is underpinned by the assumption that highly competent people can improve their working practices to avoid burnout. However, as I recently argued in an editorial in the BMJ, highly competent, psychologically healthy and seemingly resilient people are likely to face an increased risk of burnout.

It seems counterintuitive, but one of the earliest studies on workplace burnout showed that workers who were happier, less anxious and more able to relieve stress were more likely to develop burnout than those in a comparison group without these traits. This largely forgotten study involved air traffic controllers in the US in the 1970s; it followed over 400 of them for three years. Most of the cohort (99%) had served in the US Armed Forces, so we can expect that they had experience of extreme stress and most likely had developed resilience.

This study shows us some of the conditions for creating burnout in this seemingly high functioning and resilient group. Their work was continually becoming more complex, with new technologies being introduced, without the necessary training to use them. They worked long shifts without breaks and had poor environments to work in. Their hours and rotas were challenging and could be unpredictable. These characteristics probably look quite familiar to millennials and anyone working in the gig economy.

Opposite effect

The recent focus on training workers to avoid burnout by encouraging them to be more resilient is likely to become another stress, pressure or high ideal. It is likely that this serves to increase the risk for burnout, especially for the types of perfectionists who are highly self-critical.

The importance of our ideals, our view of what we are and should be, also shows us why labelling millennials as “snowflakes” is probably harmful. Similarly, any intensive parenting that attempts to create resilient children may be counterproductive. This is because the core messages of intensive parenting are actually about social control and conformity, and these probably feed into children’s internal and external ideals for the future.

What we can learn from burnout trends is that work is becoming rapidly and overwhelmingly more difficult and complex. This is driving higher burnout levels in many professions and in informal workers, such as caregivers, and also, potentially, in millennials. The solution is to simplify complex, contradictory and hostile work and personal environments, rather than giving us all another job of training ourselves to be more resilient to these environments.The Conversation 

The Conversation

Rajvinder Samra is a lecturer in health at The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.