As Courts Begin to Junk Cases, Foreign Tablighi Jamaat Members Anxiously Await Safe Passage Home

For these foreigners who were arrested, it has been an excruciating six months in India.

Mumbai: The horrors of the 11 days spent in the Byculla women’s prison keep coming back to Yursi Amina in flashes. And each time it does, the 27 year old says she is panic stricken.

Yursi, an Indonesian national, had come to India on February 29 along with her husband, Rizal Ardiansyah, to attend the Tablighi event at the Nizamuddin Markaz in New Delhi. It was meant to be a 40-day visit – a few days in Delhi and the rest in Mumbai. But with the outbreak of COVID-19 in the country, a sudden nationwide lockdown and the subsequent communalisation of the Tablighi event, Yursi, like 3,500 foreigners, ended up in prisons across the country.

“It was a month of Ramzan, we were all fasting. Suddenly one day, everything changed and we were all sent to jail,” she said. Of all things, the most humiliating and distressing part of the prison experience for her was pleading with the jail authorities for a scarf to pray. “They wouldn’t budge. We were left with no other choice but to wrap our heads with polythene bags while praying,” she recalled.

Yursi is pregnant with her fourth child. The couple is worried about having a child in a foreign country which has criminalised them. Meanwhile, their three other children have been left under the care of their relatives. “We have talked to them only on video calls ever since. Our kids are too young to stay without parents for this long. They are yearning for us, we are yearning for them here,” Rizal said.

Yursi and Rizal were one of six Indonesian couples that had travelled to Bandra. Another couple – 27-year-old Melisa and 36-year-old Mukti Ali Bn Abdul Majed – are also expecting a child. All six couples had arrived in Mumbai on March 7, a good two weeks before the lockdown was formally announced in Maharashtra.

Also read: ‘Chosen to Make Them Scapegoats’: Bombay HC Quashes FIRs Against Tablighi Jamaat Members

“We had already completed the quarantine period when we got to know that several attendees of Tablighi Jamaat were booked in Delhi and elsewhere,” said 39-year-old Megi Kurniawan, a cycle shop owner who came to India for the first time with his wife, Eka Fadhilla.

Worrying that similar action could be taken against those in Mumbai, the local Jamaat which had made arrangements for the visitors in Mumbai, approached the Bandra police station.

“Every activity of the Jamaat is properly documented with the police. The local police at any given point knows how many visitors, especially foreign nationals, are in town. They already had all essential information about these six couples too,” said Shahnawaz Momin, the coordinator and caretaker of the families in India.

Momin and his wife Amisa have been taking care of the families since March. “We have tried to make their stay in the city as comfortable as possible in the time of pandemic and this unreasonable crackdown on Tabhligi members,” Amisa said. When in jail, the Indonesians were unable to eat Indian food. Amisa, along with a few volunteers, picked up a recipe or two from YouTube and would send packed food across to jail. “I am now an expert in preparing Nasi Goreng (an Indonesian dish),” she said, in jest.

In March, over 3,500 foreign nationals from across 35 nations had come to India. Most of them had moved to different parts of India after their stay in Delhi, and visited several smaller jamaats or families and friends living in the country. In Maharashtra, as well, members of the Jamaat had visited close to 15 places.

Upon the direction of the Ministry of Home Affairs, around 15 FIRs were registered in the state. But unlike other states, in at least two cases in Maharashtra, the police arbitrarily decided to slap sections like 307 and 304 (2) of the Indian Penal Code for “attempt to murder” and culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Other sections of the Epidemic Diseases Act, for disobeying the government directions, and Foreigners Act for allegedly violating visa norms have also been applied.

Also read: Tamil Nadu Has Created a Detention Camp Just to Hold 129 Foreign Tablighi Jamaat Members

“It is inexplicable,” Mohammed Riyaz said. “I have been coming to India regularly, this is my fifth time. Every visit before this has been pleasant. But suddenly we were dangerous people moving around, trying to kill Indians,” Riyaz, despondently, added. Since Riyaz and his wife were stranded in India, his eldest son had to return from a madrassa to take care of his six other siblings. “They are all by themselves. They have had to stop going to school since March,” Riyaz said.

Most people visiting India belonged to middle-class families and were dependent on small businesses. Most of them have had to shut down their business and take financial help from their relatives.

These families have since been living in Mumbai, at an undisclosed place, attending court hearings and awaiting the quick disposal of their cases. Earlier this month, the local Bandra court dropped sections 307 and 304 (2) of the IPC from the FIR.

The Bandra police had earlier claimed that as many as 504 persons had been infected because of the Indonesian Tablighi members. As many as 35 deaths were attributed to them. However, while filing the chargesheet the police claimed that they could not find evidence to support this claim.

In most cases across India, the courts have slowly begun to take note of the unfairness in the MHA’s direction to crack down on members of the Tablighi Jamaat. Last month, the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court, while quashing FIRs against Tablighi members booked by the Ahmednagar police, had observed that foreign nationals visiting India had been made into scapegoats.

“A political government tries to find a scapegoat when there is pandemic or calamity and the circumstances show that there is probability that these foreigners were chosen to make them scapegoats,” the division bench of Justices T.V. Nalawade and M.G. Sewlikar had observed in their 58-page order while quashing FIRs against 29 foreign nationals and six Indian citizens. Their passports have since been returned and they are awaiting a return to their respective countries.

“The material on the record shows that Tabligh Jamat is not a separate sect of Muslim but it is only movement for reformation of religion… In any case, even from the record, it cannot be inferred that the foreigners were spreading Islam religion by converting persons of other religion to Islam. The record shows that the foreigners were not talking Indian languages like Hindi or Urdu and they were talking languages like Arebian, French etc (sic).” the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court had observed in the cases registered in Ahmednagar.

This observation is true in the cases of most foreign nationals who came to India. Most of them struggle to communicate even in English, let alone local Indian languages.

Their lawyer, Ishrat Ali Khan, has moved the court seeking a discharge from the case. “Their passports were impounded and unless this case is disposed of, they can’t return to their home country. The case is next scheduled for a hearing on September 16,” Khan said.

But taking a cue from the high court order, other local courts too have slowly begun disposing of the cases now. A local court in Thane has discharged 28 members of the Tablighi Jamaat, including 21 foreign nationals, in two separate cases. Among those implicated include 13 Bangladeshis, eight Malaysians, four Indians and four trustees who had helped the foreign nationals during their stay at Mumbra in Thane.

Also read: Why Flinging the Term ‘Corona Jihad’ at the Tablighi Jamaat Makes No Sense

It has been an excruciating six months in India, Riyaz said. “But that would not deter us. Allah willing, we will want to come back to India again,” he added.

‘Chosen to Make Them Scapegoats’: Bombay HC Quashes FIRs Against Tablighi Jamaat Members

The Aurangabad bench said that the decision to criminalise foreign nationals en masse was to give “an indirect warning” to Indian Muslims protesting against the CAA.

Mumbai: “A political government tries to find a scapegoat when there is pandemic or calamity and the circumstances show that there is probability that these foreigners were chosen to make them scapegoats,” the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court observed while quashing FIRs registered in Maharashtra against several foreign nationals who had attended the Markaz Nizamuddun event in New Delhi in March.

Stating that the decision to criminalise foreign nationals en masse was done to give “an indirect warning” to Indian Muslims who had been protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) across the country, the division bench of Justices T.V. Nalawade and M.G. Sewlikar quashed FIRs registered against 29 foreign nationals and six Indian citizens. The court also observed that these FIRs were filed out of malicious intentions and that is an important consideration while quashing these FIRs.

In its 58-page judgment, delivered on August 21, the court observed:

“There were protests by taking processions, holding dharana at many places in India at least from prior to January 2020. Most of the persons participated in protest were Muslims. It is their contention that Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 is discriminatory against the Muslims. They believe that Indian citizenship will not be granted to Muslim refugees and migrants. They were protesting against National Registration of Citizenship (NRC). There were protests on large scale not only in Delhi, but in most states in India. It can be said that due to the present action taken fear was created in the minds of those Muslims. This action indirectly gave warning to Indian Muslims that action in any form and for anything can be taken against Muslims.”

While the two judges were unanimous in their decision on quashing the FIRs, Justice Sewlikar said that he had differing views on certain observations made by Justice Nalawade and he would be writing a separate judgment on the matter.

In March, right after a lockdown was imposed countrywide, the Tablighi Jamat gathering was blamed for “spreading” the coronavirus infection. The home ministry had soon after directed state governments to initiate criminal action against the Tablighi Jamat members who had attended the New Delhi event. After the event, many of them travelled to different states and were either visiting friends and relatives or were staying at Masjids there.

Aurangabad bench of the Bombay high court.

‘Police acted mechanically’

The high court order came close to six months after nearly 3,500 foreign nationals from 35 countries were arrested and later detained in different government and private facilities across India. In Maharashtra, too, the government identified several Tablighi Jamat members. Following the home ministry’s order, the state police filed multiple FIRs across different districts and several foreign nationals have since been stuck in the state.

To this, the Bombay high court observed that:

“The aforesaid material and discussion of law shows that Maharashtra police acted mechanically. It appears that the State Government acted under political compulsion and police also did not dare to exercise powers given to them under provisions of procedural law like Cr.P.C. and substantive laws. The record shows that there was non-application of mind by police and that is why even when no record was available to make out prima facie case, chargesheets are filed by police.”

At least three FIRs were registered in Ahmednagar district. Advocate Shaikh Mazhar Jahagirdar, appearing for the foreign detainees in the district told The Wire that while the Indian nationals belonging to other states had managed to return to the hometown, the foreigners have had to stay back with only local community support.

“They have since been in Ahmednagar as one of their bail conditions were to not leave the district limits. Many Muslim community organisations have offered help and those detained have since been largely dependent just the help offered to them,” Jahagirdar said. Most of these foreign nationals, he added, belonged to poor families and were finding it difficult to continue living away from their respective countries for such a long period.

Bombay high court order by The Wire on Scribd

Although accused of similar “crimes”, different state polices have adopted different approach while registering the case. In some cases, the FIRs only mentioned sections of the Epidemic Diseases Act or the Indian Penal Code. In some cases, the police also invoked sections of the Foreigners Act for allegedly flouting visa rules by “indulging in the proselytization activities”.

The Bombay high court, however, rubbished these allegations and observed:

“The material on the record shows that Tabligh Jamat is not a separate sect of Muslim but it is only movement for reformation of religion… In any case, even from the record, it cannot be inferred that the foreigners were spreading Islam religion by converting persons of other religion to Islam. The record shows that the foreigners were not talking Indian languages like Hindi or Urdu and they were talking languages like Arebian, French etc (sic).”

In the judgment, the court further observed, “Unless a particular programme of such foreigner or idea of such foreigner or doctrine or set of principles proposed by him do not create unrest in that religion or society, one cannot prevent the foreigner from expressing his ideas about reformation. There is no such specific allegation also against the foreigners. Nothing is said as to which ideas the foreigners were propagating.”

Members of the Tablighi Jamaat leave from LNJP Hospital to a quarantine centre. Photo: PTI/Files

‘Persons harassed’ 

Those detained in Maharashtra belonged to several foreign countries like the Ivory Coast, Tanzania, Djibouti, Ghana and Indonesia. The court, taking a humane approach said, “If there was any substance in the contention that there was possibility of spreading virus by these persons, proper action would have been taken against them, to send them back to their own country without taking action like present one. In the situation created by pandemic near and dear of every person who is out of house and particularly out of country are worried about the wellbeing of such persons. The actions against such persons harass not only such person, but also there near and dears.”

Also Read: Tamil Nadu Has Created a Detention Camp Just to Hold 129 Foreign Tablighi Jamaat Members

The Bombay high court is not the first court to make serious observations in the handling of the Tablighi Jamaat and its alleged role in spreading the coronavirus. The Madurai bench of the Madras high court, in June, had observed that the detainees in Tamil Nadu had already “suffered enough” and that Article 21 of the constitution of India applies to the applicants, even if they are of foreign nationality.

The Bombay high court too has equated religion with Article 21 and observed that that religion is a part of life, at least for believers, and hence should be covered under an individual’s right to life. Similar orders have been passed from time to time by different district courts and high court while either ordering for the foreign detainees’ release or quashing of the FIR.