Allahabad HC Expresses Concern Over Political Parties Welcoming Gangsters Into Their Fold

Denying bail to two UP police officers accused of conspiring with gangster Vikas Dubey, the court made several observations on corruption and organised crime.

New Delhi: Denying bail to two Uttar Pradesh police officials who are accused of conspiring with gangster Vikas Dubey, the Allahabad high court expressed concern over political parties welcoming criminals and gangsters into their fold, saying if this trend continues, it will seriously dent the country’s democratic setup.

The high court on Tuesday denied bail to station house officer Vinay Kumar Tiwari and beat officer Krishna Kumar Sharma, who are accused of alerting Dubey about an impending raid on his house. This allowed the gangster and his associates to set up an ambush in Bikru village on July 3, 2020, the police say. Eight policemen died in the ambush. Dubey was later captured and killed in an alleged encounter on July 10.

In his order, Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava made several observations, spanning the nature of organised crime, the presence of ‘black sheep’ in the police force and the tendency of political parties to induct gangsters and criminals into their fold.

The order, published by LiveLaw, says that crime, corruption and population are “three major problems” that India is facing at present. “While against crime and corruption, particularly when it is organised crime and corruption, strict state action and intervention is necessary to restrict and minimise the same to [the] maximum extent, control over population growth requires legal steps and strategy inclusive of motivation, spread of education and awareness and some positive incentive to those who opt for family planning,” the judge wrote. He said against crime and corruption, the state must “continue with the policy of zero tolerance”.

Justice Srivastava said that recently, there has been a “concerning trend” where political parties welcome gangsters and criminals involved in organised crime into the party and try to back and protect them, “painting and spreading an imaginary image of Robinhood”.

“They are given tickets to contest elections and sometimes they win also. This trend needs to be stopped as soon as possible,” the order reads.

The court advised all political parties to take a decision that gangsters and criminals will be discouraged in politics and no political party will give tickets to them in public elections.

“The political parties should rise to the occasion and must guide themselves keeping in view that there cannot be a concept of ‘my criminal’ and ‘his criminal’ or ‘my man’ and ‘his man’, as a gangster is gangster only and is required to be condemned from all corners and even people/voters should also take note of it while making their choice for a candidate in a general election,” the order says.

According to LiveLaw, the court added:

“We must have the idea in mind that if we are entrusted with the responsibility of nation-building, our responsibility is to think about the future generation to whom we have to hand over a legacy. We need to ponder what kind of nation and society we want to leave for our future generation.”

If this trend is allowed to continue, one day these gangsters and criminals will become “Bhasmasur” and will dent the country and its democratic setup, the court said.

Also Read: Vikas Dubey Is the Symptom of a Political System That Provides Patronage to Criminals

The court said that strict and rigorous steps need to been taken to “break and demolish the financial network of gangsters”. This shall certainly bring about more positive results towards restricting criminal activities and organised crime, the court opined.

The order acknowledges that police officers face several difficulties in combating organised crime and criminal activities, including that they do not have access to “sophisticated arms”. These, the court said, “are available in plenty to the gangsters and their gang members”.

However, Justice Srivastava also said that it is “not an unknown phenomenon” that some policemen, though they may be very few in numbers, “show their loyalty more to such gangsters than to their department”.

“Such policemen tarnish the image, name, and fame of police and it is necessary that suspicious police personnel should be taken to task and their conduct should be regularly monitored for which a mechanism should be evolved, and if it exists already, the same should be geared up at different levels,” the court said.

The court said that “policing such police personnel is a big task”, suggesting that early identification of ‘black sheep’, monitoring their conduct and taking immediate strict disciplinary action would help reduce the problem.

The court gave the serious and heinous nature of the offence, complicity of the applicants in the conspiracy and the overall circumstances of the case as reasons to deny the bail applications of the two UP police officers.

Allahabad HC Denies Bail to 2 Officers Who ‘Colluded’ with Vikas Dubey Before Police Raid

When UP police had gone to raid Dubey’s suspected hideout, they were met with armed, prepared gangsters who opened fire on them, killing eight officers.

New Delhi: The Allahabad high court on Tuesday, September 21, denied bail to two officers of the Uttar Pradesh police accused of leaking information to criminal Vikas Dubey in the lead up to the police raid to apprehend him, Bar and Bench reported.

Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava noted that it was “evident” that the two officers, station officer Vinay Tiwari and sub-inspector K.K. Sharma, had prior information about the police raid and had leaked said information to Dubey.

The police raid had taken place on July 3, 2020 in UP’s Bikru village. When police arrived at the area, they were met with a prepared gang of criminals who allegedly opened fire on the police, leading to the deaths of eight officers and injuries to several others.

Dubey, who had escaped the raid, was later apprehended in Madhya Pradesh and was killed in another encounter on July 10. 

According to the UP police, the vehicle carrying Dubey toppled over when the driver swerved to avoid a herd of cattle. In the confusion, Dubey, the police claimed, managed to steal a revolver from an officer, ran, and was gunned down by police.

This sequence of events offered by police has been challenged on various public fora. Police was, however, given a clean chit by the three-member judicial commission investigating the encounter, though the panel said it had found that local police had colluded with Dubey.

Also read: UP Police Affidavit on Vikas Dubey Encounter Puts Supreme Court Between Rock and Hard Place

Tiwari and Sharma had been charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including 147, 148 and 149 (which deal with rioting), 305 and 307 (related to murder), 504 and 506 (related to criminal intimidation), 332 and 333 (relating to harm caused to a public servant), among others, Live Law reported.

The investigating officer (IO) of the case, after speaking to several witnesses, found that the officers in question had a “close friendship” with Dubey and his gang.

While denying bail, Justice Srivastava remarked that the actions of the accused led to the “horrendous” incident where several police personnel lost their lives and went on to note that the accused may have also wanted to settle a personal grudge with the circle officer who was killed in the ambush.

The court took several factors into account while denying bail, including the failure of the two accused to participate in the raid or provide support to other officers, the findings of the IO, the magnitude of the situation and the general conduct of the accused before and during the incident.